STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY

October 7, 2013 • 145/6 • FREE www.the-peak.ca | Thong Connery since 1965

2 October 7, 2013 · Volume 145, Issue 6FIRST PEEK

»

»

»

»

»

»

»

»

»

»

»

»

 

C A N A D I A NCOMMUNITYNEWSPAPERAWARD 2013

At SFU, it’s difficult to register for courses that fit one’s schedule and align with one’s degree path, let alone one’s own interests. What’s more, many students are made to feel that their efforts are for naught, upon realizing their professor seems more interested in returning to their lab than actually teaching their class. If you’re unable to switch schedules, these weekly lectures be-come four months of frustration at having a teacher whose expertise does not translate into the ability to communicate the material.

Of course, professors all have their own strengths: some are hap-pier to discuss with a small group than a full lecture hall, while oth-ers are better able to communicate material orally than through email or syllabi. In the end, however, some professors are simply better researchers than they are teachers.

At an institution responsible for both pursuing research and edu-cating students, the two functions need to be valued equally. Yes, stu-dents should recognize the benefits of learning in close proximity with experts in their fields, and yes, SFU is a research university, but that label is twofold.

This is not to say research isn’t a crucial component of a univer-sity — the fact that it employs ac-tive researchers and scholars is one of its distinguishing features. SFU turns out innovative studies every week, from diagnosing skin cancer, to unlocking the key to evolution, to analysing how stereotypes affect one’s housing options. This research puts SFU on the academic map, the benefits of which can be seen in the millions of dollars the university is given towards future projects.

The issue arises when a profes-sor’s research skills are valued more than his or her teaching abilities. In some departments at SFU, profes-sors are reviewed every two years regarding their research. If they aren’t making a certain amount of progress, they can lose merits, which sometimes results in them being given more classes to teach.

The problem with this for-mula is that increased teaching responsibilities are framed as a punishment to these professors. Moreover, by giving classes to re-searchers who are struggling or who would prefer to be behind a desk, animosity and tension is created, which is, in turn, felt by students — no one wants to be taught by someone who does not want to be there.

SFU reviews a professor’s teaching skills through course evaluations at the end of a se-mester and by vetting professors when they are first hired and when they apply for tenure. Yet, many students are still made to endure disinterested lecturers and incompetent instructors. Even if a professor is engaging and expresses excitement about their topic, poor communica-tion skills can leave students with more questions than answers.

One of the most difficult prob-lems to address is the evaluation of an individual’s teaching skills. Course evaluations can be made irrelevant by students who argue that a lot of readings and tough marking equates to bad teach-ing. Since this is not the case, this process of evaluation clearly isn’t entirely reliable, meaning SFU needs to develop a better way of assessing its teaching staff.

All things considered, many re-searchers possess expertise that is thought to be invaluable to a uni-versity, and one could not expect the university to turn away the next Einstein because he has trouble lecturing in large lecture halls. That said, 300 students should not be subjected to his lectures.

The balance between being an educator and being an expert is vital to the university as a haven for in-novation, as well as an institution fostering future experts. If SFU truly values these points equally, perhaps the students, as well as the pro-fessors, will see their efforts in the classroom better recognised.

3FIRST PEEK October 7, 2013

4 news editor Alison Roach associate news editor Leah Bjornsonemail / phone news@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560NEWS October 7, 2013

On Saturday, Sept. 28, SFU Surrey played host to “Our Future, Our Voice,” the first event of the week-long 2013 Community Summit: Charting BC’s Economic Future, hosted by SFU Public Square. The day-long forum invited youth be-tween 16 and 25 years old to par-ticipate in roundtable and panel discussions, and weigh in on the economic future of the province.

Of the 90 students who at-tended SFU Public Square’s sec-ond annual youth forum, many weighed in on the event through Twitter under #OurVoiceBC, which was projected on a screen in front of the main theatre for the entire duration of the event.

Participants were encour-aged to tweet questions to the three panelists — BC education minister Peter Fassbender, Sur-rey councillor Barinda Rasode, and NDP MP Jenni Sims — who would be speaking at the end of the day.

The youth engagement fac-tor played a large role in shaping the design of the event, said or-ganizer Jackie Pichette, Research and Communications Officer with SFU Public Square. Pichette facilitated “idea jams” over the past two months where young people were asked to design a youth forum that they would want to attend.

Twitter was a unanimously desired element, as were smaller break-out groups where par-ticipants would be able to meet people currently in job industries they were interested in enter-ing into after graduation. In re-sponse, the event featured small roundtable dialogues held over lunch, where community and industry representatives from law enforcement, media, tech, construction, and other sectors, were open to questioning.

Only a handful of attendees were post-secondary students, with the overwhelming majority being from high schools across

the Lower Mainland. This turn-out which surprised Pichette, who said that at last year’s youth forum, there was a more even mix of university and high school students.

For many of the attendees it was their first time being able to engage with politicians in such a direct manner. “I didn’t know anything about this forum when I decided to attend, but now I’m excited for the opportunity to ask actual politicians some questions,” said Sunaina Paudel, a grade 12 student at Johnston Heights Secondary, who heard

about the event through her stu-dent leadership group.

Other attendees had a more developed interest in politics. Amie Johnson, a third-year politi-cal science student at SFU, works for the city of Surrey as a child and youth engagement assistant. She facilitated one of the 100 Community Conversations that had happened in the past two months, which were events also hosted by SFU Public Square. “I hope to run for office in the mu-nicipal government someday, so this is important to me,” she said.

The event began with a morn-ing icebreaker, followed by SFU professor Matt Hern, founder of Car Free Day and Purple Thistle Centre who spoke on the GDP as a poor measure of the economy.

The final segment of the day was the panel, moderated by ex-CTV reporter Kai Nagata. There was friendly tension between the three panelists, all of whom represented different opinions along the po-litical spectrum. Youth-centric

issues, such as education and jobs, dominated the discussion, though gender and race also fea-tured prominently.

“You’re in the minority here,” Rasode and Sims joked to Fass-bender in reference to one par-ticipant’s tweet, which noted that women of colour outnumbered white men on the panel.

“There was no way I was mak-ing a panel with more men than women,” said Pichette.

On education, Rasode spoke to the importance of including stu-dents and teachers in the discus-sion rather than keeping the dia-logue behind closed doors among

elected representatives — a state-ment partially directed at Sims, the former president of the BC Teach-er’s Federation.

When asked about employ-ment opportunities in the prov-ince, Fassbender said that many BC jobs simply were not located in Vancouver, but in the interior province, like Dawson Creek. “You ladies can go up there and buy a truck, and not have to sell drugs,” he said to appeal to young women in the audience.

He also talked about managing resources more sustainably, rather than shutting down the operations altogether, though he did not men-tion renewable sources, a sentiment that proved unpopular among the live tweeters. In response, Sims said that economic and environmental sustainability should not be seen as two separate entities.

The panel proved to be popu-lar with attendees, who were al-lowed to direct questions at the attendees for the last half hour of the session.

5NEWS October 7, 2013

This fall, SFU Health and Coun-selling Services is launching its newest initiative with the hopes of eliminating the stigma at-tached to mental illness and mental health issues.

The Hi F.I.V.E. movement, which stands for Friendship, In-vite Conversation, Value every-one’s gift, and Eliminate stigma‚ aims to increase on-campus dialogue of mental health issues through student-led outreaches, cross-campus partnerships, and various campaigns. The goal is to create a campus-wide safe space where students feel comfortable disclosing mental health issues without fear of judgement from peers, staff, and faculty.

Erika Horwitz, Associate Di-rector of SFU Health and Coun-selling Services, has been de-veloping this program over the past four years with the help of a small committee made up of professionals working in post-secondary institutions. The purpose of the committee was to look at the university and as-sess how it could support men-tal health and intervene better when students were struggling.

The group eventually devel-oped a mental health pledge that embodies the values of the Hi F.I.V.E. initiative: embracing ev-eryone; understanding the facts; not treating people as if all they are is their diagnosis; treating people with respect; and standing up to people who disrespect those with mental health problems.

For Horwitz, this is an issue that hits close to home. Horwitz’s daughter, now 24, began at age 14 to have very bad anxiety and depression. During her eight year struggle, Horwitz says her daugh-ter did not receive much sup-port from her peers or even some health professionals.

“Seeing her journey through the mental health system . . . I’ve become aware that many stu-dents don’t want to come and

get help because they carry the stigma,” said Horwitz. “We need to become more compassionate and caring and informed so that we can make their life more suc-cessful and make them feel like they’re part of our community.”

Although Health and Career Counselling at SFU developed a mental health strategy six or seven years ago, this is the first three-campus-wide initiative that SFU has undertaken to raise awareness and eliminate the stigma attached to mental health issues. The initiative also marks a

desire to involve student volun-teers, who may be better able to engage their peers.

One of 30-plus volunteers, Vivien Low was initially hired by Health and Counselling Ser-vices through co-op in January and has continued to work with the program since then. Along with SFSS Health Sciences Rep-resentative, Dhylan Verzosa, these Hi FIVE’rs (as Horwitz af-fectionately refers to them) have created Hi F.I.V.E. travel diaries, which were inspired by Face-book sites like SFU Confessions and Overheard at SFU.

“My observation was that ,under this veil of anonymity, stu-dents were able to be very honest and open about their stories,” said Low. “We came up with this physi-cal, tangible diary where students can actually pick it up around campus, write their story in it, and pass it on to other students.”

The goal, says Horwitz, is to get everyone talking and sharing their own experiences bringing awareness to the fact that hav-ing mental health issues does not mean you are “crazy” or “wonky.”

“Mental health includes all of us at different degrees,” explained Horwitz. “This initiative is really based on the values that the SFU community holds, and that is to embrace everybody. What is very important is that it will change

attitudes and behaviours towards issues of mental health — not just mental illness.”

Horwitz herself will be fea-tured in a video on the website as part of a series that invites “regular” individuals to share their own stories of struggles with mental health, from stress to schizophrenia.

Currently, Health and Coun-selling is inviting faculty or stu-dent groups, who hold space on campus, to read the pledge, commit to it, and advertise their facility as a Hi F.I.V.E. safe and respectful space. Students are also invited to take the pledge and put a Hi F.I.V.E. button on their bag, indicating themselves as “mobile safe spaces.”

The initiative will also be re-training staff and student volun-teers to incorporate the elimi-nation of stigma in their peer training sessions.

6 NEWS October 7, 2013

UNIVERSITY BRIEFS

Following the debate between SFSS board members and Food and Beverage Services general manager, John Flipse, over whether or not the High-land Pub should charge cover on Wings Wednesday, the SFSS board of directors has come to a resolution.

The board has decided to allow event bookings with the stipulation that cover not be charged before 9:00 p.m. and that those who enter the pub before the cut off will not have to pay to stay. The pub had just recently starting booking events regularly on Wednesday nights, which allows clubs and DSUs to play host and charge cover at the door in exchange for paying half of the pub’s se-curity fees for the night.

In order to allow this and still cover some of the security fees that clubs and DSUs pay when they book events, the SFSS will be offering a pub sponsorship package to clubs who demon-strate a need for financial assis-tance with throwing their event. The financing will come from an existing fund that has already been budgeted.

The funds from the SFSS will cover half of the security costs

for events, approximately $575, as well as $50 for advertising. The decision to contribute the funding to clubs hosting events comes after the SFSS Commer-cial Services Committee passed a motion recommending to Flipse to not charge cover be-fore 9:00 p.m. on Wednesdays. Events on different nights will not be subject to the cut-off rule.

Formerly, when patrons wished to remain inside the pub on Wednesdays when clubs were hosting events, they were required to pay half of the cover being charged at the door. The SFSS subsidy will alleviate the need for this charge.

Moe Kopahi, SFSS member services officer, pointed to an event two weeks ago, hosted by the the fraternity Alpha Kappa Psi where the group fundraised $1,300 in four hours, as an ex-ample that student groups will still be able to fundraise large amounts under the system.

There is a stipulation with the sponsorship package that requires clubs and DSUs to at-tract a certain number of people to their event in order to gain funding from the SFSS, in order to incentivize them to promote heavily. Kopahi indicated that they are currently working on a table to account for different at-tendance possibilities.

Kopahi sees the arrange-ment as a good compromise be-tween Flipse’s attempts to lessen the pub’s deficit, and the SFSS’s aim to meet student needs.

The lawyer representing Kayla Bourque, the former SFU stu-dent and animal killer with 46 court-ordered conditions of pro-bation, is arguing for the loosen-ing of some of these conditions, including the lifetime ban on owning a pet.

“There have been cases where people have been banned from owning animals for up to 25 years and I have asked the court to look at those for an appropriate limitation”, said Andrew Bonfield, Bourque’s lawyer.

Bourque was sentenced to eight months in jail followed by three years of probation for “caus-ing unnecessary pain, suffering or injury to animals, willfully and without lawful excuse killing ani-mals and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose.”

Bourque had confessed to disemboweling a cat and videos had surfaced of her eviscerating a dog while narrating the scene. She had also confessed to a de-sire to kill humans, and a “kill kit” including items such as a knife, razor blades, a mask and

a syringe had been found in her room at SFU residence.

Bonfield argued before the BC Court of Appeal that her stringent probation conditions, which in-cluded constant surveillance, a ban from all social media, and owning pets for the rest of her life, were “ex-cessive” and limiting to Bourque’s chances at rehabilitation.

“How does Ms. Bourque ad-vance?” Bonfield asked the three-judge panel on Wednesday Septem-ber 11, according to the Vancouver Province. “How does she show any progress? How can you gauge reha-bilitation if your life is so limited?”

“We want her to be involved in mental health,” Bonfield later told CBC News. “We want her to be involved in lots of other things so that she can hopefully not end up with any problems in her future.”

Diagnosed by psycholo-gists as a psychopath with nar-cissistic disorder, Bourque has been described by director of

criminology Rob Gordon as a “functioning human being with-out a conscience.”

According to the National Li-brary of Medicine, among the many symptoms associated with psycho-pathology, a person suffering from this condition displays manipula-tive behavior, callousness, and a complete lack of remorse. It is also considered a “lifelong condition,” says the Mayo Clinic, with some im-provement possible over time but no guaranteed method of treatment and rehabilitation.

Bourque has shown an inter-est in treatment, but after being evaluated by psychologists, they agreed that she had no remorse or insight into her crimes.

“Given Bourque’s pattern and escalation of offenses, why should we think treatment can perform the miracle of instilling a conscience where a natural one seems to be lacking?” wrote Huff-ington Post’s blog managing edi-tor Marni Soupcoff.

7NEWS October 7, 2013

ENGAGING THE WORLD

SIM

ON

FR

ASE

R U

NIV

ERSI

TY

AWARDS FOREXCELLENCE IN TEACHING

Nominations are now being accepted for Awards for Excellence in Teaching.

All continuing full and part-time faculty members (tenured and tenure-track professors, lecturers, and lab instructors) who have taught a minimum of 5 years in a continuing position at Simon Fraser University are eligible for the awards.

Nominations may be made by Simon Fraser University students, alumni and/or faculty. To make a nomination, please write by October 15, 2013, to:

University Committee for the Excellence in Teaching Awards c/o O!ce of the Vice-President, Academic

Simon Fraser UniversityBurnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6

Phone: (778) 782-3925 Fax: (778) 782-5876 Include your name, address and telephone number, and reasons why your nominee is deserving of this award. !e winners of the Awards will be selected based upon the following criteria:

More information on the nomination and adjudication of the Excel-lence in Teaching Awards can be found on our website at:http://www.sfu.ca/vpacademic/Committees_TaskForces/Stand-ing_Committees/Teaching-Excellence/

Or you may contact the O"ce of the Vice-President, Academic at (778) 782-3925.

After 36 years, the SFU Pipe Band has a new leader.

Terry Lee, who was been the band’s pipe major since 1977, is retiring, leaving the position in the hands of piper Alan Bevan. Bevan, who along with his wife Bonnie has been involved with the band since 1995, was formerly the pipe major of a competing band, the Abbotsford Police Pipe Band, but always had his eye on the SFU band.

“It’s great. It’s something I’ve always wanted to do from when I first heard the band play when I was really young,” said Bevan. “I’d always aspired to play with the band. I finally got the opportunity and have never looked back.”

In his years with the band, Bevan has been involved with the tuning team, whose job it is to ensure that all the sets of bag-pipes are in tune and moving at the same rate.

The changing of the guard comes on the heels of the band

placing fourth in the World Pipe Band Championships in Glasgow this past August, a re-sult that Lee described at the time as, “Not what we came for, but we’re in the prizes.” The SFU pipe band has six championship wins under their belt, but were overcome by bad weather on the day of this year’s competition.

Bevan described his reac-tion to the results as “kind of mixed feelings.”

“We had a very strong sea-son locally, and we’re always working on improving and I think we made some gains in a number of areas,” he contin-ued. Bevan pointed specifically to a new medley that the band worked on for the past year that actually beat the current world champions on the day of the qualifier round.

“We felt really good, we had a strong performance,” said

Bevan. “It’s always a bit of a risk when you take a new competi-tion set out, because you don’t know how it’s going to go over with the Scottish judges, and we only get one crack at them.”

Bevan has already taken over the pipe major position, though the band is currently on a break. They’ll resume practising later this month.

Lee is not leaving the band entirely, but will remain involved with tuning, music construc-tion, and band administration, something that Bevan described as an “unusual transition.”

“Usually when a pipe major steps down he actually leaves the band or he just doesn’t have anything more to do with lead-ership,” Bevan explained; “In our case Terry is going to be very involved. I find that quite com-forting that I’m going to have access to all that experience.”

Once band practices re-sume, Bevan plans to make some music changes, but to mainly keep the band on the same trajectory that they are presently on.

“I forsee it being a very smooth transition,” said Bevan, “not a lot of bumps. Hopefully. I really don’t think there [would be a reason for that]; the band’s not really rebuilding. It’s not broken and I’m certainly not going to try to fix it.”

The article, “Engineering students show need for speed,” incorrectly stated that totem poles from Nahino Park are stored in the former Shell gas station building. Phil McCoy from Facility Management clarified this point and explained that various facilities use the building for storage. The area has also been used for the softball team’s batting practice “for about ten years,” says head coach Mike Rennie.

In the article “TransLink to review public art policy,” it mentions that TransLink is reacting to public opinion with their decision to review the policy. However, according to Derek Zabel, TransLink media relations, TransLink had undertaken this initiative prior to any public interest.

8 opinions editor Tara Nykyforiakemail / phone opinions@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560October 7, 2013OPINIONS

By the time this article is in your hands, I sincerely hope the im-pending US crisis will be over. It will have been almost a week since the Government of the United States shut down over Republican refusal to allow the implementation of “Obamacare” or the Affordable Care Act.

While this seems ridiculous — especially to Canadians who have had subsidized healthcare for decades — it isn’t actually unusual for a US governmental shutdown to occur. The US fed-eral government has shut down on 18 occasions since 1976; dur-ing a shutdown, essential ser-vices continue to operate until the two parties can figure out what to do next. This time, how-ever, the shutdown hides a po-tentially world changing threat.

On October 17, the United States government will breach its debt ceiling. In layman’s terms, this means that the Treasury

Department will no longer be able to borrow money to make up the deficit between govern-ment spending and tax revenue. This, in turn, means that the American government will no longer be able pay its bills, which is clearly not a good thing.

This is not the first time the US government’s debt ceiling has made the news. In fact, it’s only been a couple of years since the last time the United States was going to breach its debt ceiling. In that instance, last minute ma-neuvering by Congress led to the debt ceiling being raised, and a crisis situation was averted. What makes this instance different is that Congress is not in session because of the shutdown, and, if they don’t get back together soon, a world of financial trouble will brew over.

All of a sudden, a ridicu-lous political debate filled with equally insane rhetoric — US Senator Ted Cruz compared the threat of Obamacare to Nazi Ger-many — becomes an issue that could have global ramifications. What are these ramifications, ex-actly? No one can truly know.

In the history of the nation, the United States has never breached its debt ceiling. Fur-thermore, it’s not even an event

that has been planned for — unlike a shutdown, there is no contingency plan in place.

Many economists have started to speculate what it would look like if the American government were to breach its debt ceiling. The general con-sensus is that if the United States is unable to pay its bills, this would provoke a global fi-nancial crisis, as it would cause the safest asset in the financial system — US treasury bonds — to default. If this happens, it could very well lead to a global economic crisis due to the number of world economies re-liant on America and the power of its economy.

For the sake of the world, I am begging America to come to some sort of an agreement. Republicans, we get that you don’t like Obamacare, but it was signed into law three years ago and is merely awaiting proper implementation. You lost, so get over it. And Democrats, fig-ure out some way to compro-mise with the Republicans be-fore you drag the entire world down around you.

Do the jobs you were elected to do, and figure out how to make the government run. The clock is ticking.

David Gilmour, an English pro-fessor at the University of To-ronto, has been the recipient of negative attention recently for admitting that he elects not to teach women authors in his lec-tures. This confession is prob-lematic, in that it judges and discredits an entire group of talented writers simply because they are women. While the way in which he defends his choice is poorly argued and riddled with sexism, there is nothing wrong with a professor opting not to cover female writers.

Personal preference is an important factor in decision making for any medium and Gilmour’s rationale for teach-ing books written by men is that he likes them better. If we suspend the implications at-tached to how he words his assertion, this is a fair point: everyone who takes an inter-est in literature has preferences when it comes to what they study. As a person, Gilmour is allowed to prefer male authors in the same way that I can pre-fer post-modern authors.

This is not necessarily a judgment on the authors them-selves, or their ability to write — it’s about who one is as a reader. When I say I dislike sci-fi written by those with a back-ground in science, it centres on me as a reader who does not have the patience for techni-cal terms. Professors are also allowed to have preferences when it comes to literature, and to claim otherwise would be a double standard.

The best professors are al-ways those who have an interest

in what they are teaching, and this passion noticeably carries over into the way in which they lecture. Taking this into consid-eration, it seems fitting that in a subject with content flexibility, professors should select texts with attention to their personal preferences. As a student, I would much rather get a pas-sionate series of lectures about novels written by men than have a professor teaching me something that he dislikes out of mere obligation.

Moreover, it would be detrimental for an instruc-tor to teach an author they dislike conveying their biases throughout the course, than to simply refrain from teaching them at all. Those of us who like books written by women are far better off without peo-ple like Gilmour attempting to teach us about them. In one of his comments, Gilmour states that students looking to study women’s contributions to lit-erature can “go down the hall.” Essentially, Gilmour is doing the University of Toronto a fa-vour by letting other instruc-tors cover what he is ultimately less enthusiastic about.

The truth of the matter is that there are a lot of us who do enjoy literature written by women for many reasons, and there are professors who are not only willing, but excited, to teach their works. And, in all fairness, there are a con-siderable number of courses dedicated solely to women authorship. Gilmour choos-ing not to include women in his reading list is not going to change this fact. There is also a chance that some students might enjoy taking a course which focuses on male au-thors only.

So, at the end of the day, Gilmour is free to teach nov-els written by men if it makes him happy and students con-tinue to enrol in his classes. Professors have the free-dom to design their courses within the required param-eters, and students have the freedom to choose what they want to take. While his public opinion on the matter is con-tentious, choosing books he likes is not.

9OPINIONS October 7, 2013

PRINCE GEORGE (CUP) — In recent years, the Arctic has be-come a hot commodity, and Arc-tic issues are increasingly mak-ing their way into international headlines. Russia is only the lat-est Arctic nation to follow this trend, and Canada in particular should pay closer attention if we desire to preserve our Arctic en-vironment for the future.

According to Daniel Sand-ford of BBC News in his article “Russia’s Arctic: Mission to Pro-tect Wildlife,” “Russia is plan-ning huge oil and gas develop-ments in the Arctic Ocean off its northern coast–drilling that could threaten pristine wildlife habitats.”

Despite warnings from Rus-sian scientists that large popu-lations of walruses and polar bears could be put at risk, the Russian government is continu-ing early exploration of poten-tial production areas and may begin activity within the next two decades. This future activity will depend on fluctuations in international oil and gas prices.

Polar bears and walruses in Russia — and around the world — are already facing hardships resulting from cli-mate change and environmen-tal degradation, the most sig-nificant of which is retreating ice due to melting. This melt-ing has forced numerous Arctic

animals away from their tradi-tional feeding grounds to fur-ther inland where food is both more dangerous and more dif-ficult to procure.

Instituting large-scale oil and gas production would only prove to further disrupt their

lifestyles because of the noise and pollution it would result in, ultimately chasing away food sources that are already growing scarce. These activi-ties would also risk potential oil spills that are devastating to the environment, and are

dangerous, costly, and time consuming to clean up.

Like Russia, Canada is now facing a similar dilemma where it comes to dealing with our own Arctic interests. Arctic Canada is rich in culture, bio-diversity, and natural resources.

It has a longstanding history of being a place of intercultural exchange through interactions between Arctic explorers and vibrant Inuit communities. Arctic Canada is interspersed with unique ecosystems and life that exist nowhere else on the planet, though both the Inuit and these unique ecosys-tems have recently faced the challenges of climate change and continued environmental degradation.

Canada’s Arctic also pos-sesses great political and eco-nomic potential. First, it has gained increased attention re-cently with regard to the North-west Passage, which may serve as an efficient and viable in-ternational trading route upon further glacial melting. Sec-ond, our Arctic holds enormous potential for large oil and gas reserves, which makes it ex-tremely valuable to the inter-national community. However, this current and future oil and gas mining threatens the envi-ronment in which it is housed.

Arctic nations around the world are gradually realizing this fact, and placing more of a focus on protecting their habitats because of it. This gradually increasing awareness remains, even if some do not appear to be on the same page, and Canada should take note.

Given the challenges Can-ada’s Arctic is already facing, we must be cautious not to fol-low such an environmentally damaging route if we wish to continue to enjoy a vibrant and sustainable Arctic in the future. Should we fail in this respect, we may not be the “true north” for much longer.

   

Sunday,  Oct  13,  10:30  AM  www.ellesmereunited.org    

Minister:  Rev.  Deb  Hinksman  revdeb.unitedchurch@gmail.com  Sunday  Worship  and  Children’s  Sunday  School  -­‐  10:30  AM  †  GLBT  friendly  †  Social  justice  action  †  learning  opportunities  

Burnaby  Campus  -­‐  Cornerstone  Building  -­‐  Unit  160  -­‐  inside  beside  SFU  Trust  Ellesmere  United  Church  @SFU  

 

 

10 OPINIONS October 7, 2013

SAVINGS  &  DETAILSAT  FRIGHTNIGHTS.CA    

FACE  YOUR          FEARS

ADMISSION INCLUDES UNLIMITED ACCESS TO

THE    MONSTERS    

OF  SCHLOCK  GRUESOME  COMEDY  ACT*RIDES

126HAUNTED  HOUSES

|

|

AT  WESTERN  CANADA'S  SCARIEST  HAUNT

UNTIL  NOVEMBER  2NOW  OPEN  ON  SELECT  DATES

UPGRADE  TO  A  FAST  PASS  TICKET    TO  GET  INTO  THE  HOUSES  FASTER!

PNE_PLAYLAND PNECLIPS

STALK  US  ON:

Like many people, I’m very good at hiding my prejudices, even from myself. For the longest time, I did not even realize how unfair my beliefs about bisexual people were. This discrimination — like other forms of it — is not only harmful to its victims, but to its perpetrators, too. I did not realize

what I was missing out on until I dated a bisexual woman.

For years, I believed that bi-sexual women were fundamentally heterosexual. Some were undoubt-edly hypersexual, I acknowledged, and found it necessary to branch out from their preferred male part-ners to satisfy themselves. Others were simply experimenting, con-fused. They did not identify as Questioning, because they were trying to find entrance into a com-munity to which they knew they did not belong. For these reasons, I simply did not believe that bisexu-als truly existed.

It’s not difficult to see how prejudiced these beliefs of mine were, but they were never chal-lenged, and so I held onto them.

As someone who is comfortable with the label “lesbian,” I have privilege over those with sexual orientations that are not as read-ily recognized by those within the heterosexual and homosexual worlds. I exercised this privilege without a second thought.

Perhaps more than others, I should have known better. I had identified as bisexual all my life, until I was able to accept that, de-spite living in a heteronormative world, I had no interest in men. I thought I was exceptional: a bi-sexual who loved women. My ex-perience of dating outside of the homosexual/heterosexual binary was nothing like the one I had as-cribed to bisexual women, yet I maintained it — until I met Cali.

I met Cali on OKCupid, which I was using because it took a lot of the usual guesswork out of dating; I know a person is queer, and there-fore a potential partner, because their profile tells me so outright. Cali was listed as “bisexual” on OKCu-pid. Despite this, I thought she was intelligent, beautiful and funny. I do not think Cali was ever aware of my prejudice because I hid it from her.

I generally try to be as au-thentic with potential partners as possible. However, I thought she was out of my league, despite her sexual orientation. Telling her that I suspected she was promis-cuous, confused, and disingenu-ous was not a good move under those circumstances. Predictably, she shattered my concept of bisex-ual women, and made me a very happy person in the process.

I have been forced to completely

revise my general beliefs about bi-sexual people and I have benefited from the change. I repeatedly re-mind my heterosexual male room-mate about Cali. While looking at profiles on OKCupid, I often hear him say things like, “She’s cute . . . oh, she’s bisexual,” while scroll-ing along to other profiles. I believe this prejudice is less obvious to him than it was to me, because he has never been discriminated against because of his sexual orientation.

It was not only unfair, but hypocritical, for me to think poorly of bisexuals. It’s also unfair for other members of the queer community to do so. Perhaps it’s more detrimental to us in com-parison to heterosexuals, because we have fewer possible partners available to us to begin with.

Regardless of our own sexual orientations, we must work towards a uniform respect for all. In this instance, I did not extend my rec-ognition of the prejudice I faced to people unlike me. The solution was to address my privilege over more marginalized orientations head-on. This approach is continual and dif-ficult, but well worth it.

Whether or not you support a particular war, I think we can all agree veterans deserve to be re-spected. They gave their blood, sweat, and tears for their country, and possess an invaluable per-spective on the world to impart to others. One way we honour vet-erans is through war memorials — sites dedicated to those who helped defend their country’s

freedom, and, in many instances, the lives of those in peril. One cannot imagine war if one has not experienced it first hand, myself included. But that doesn’t mean we can’t go out of our way to let our veterans know we re-spect the sacrifices they made; it was their lives on the front line, after all, and their bravery de-serves eternal recognition.

On October 1, a group of veter-ans arrived at the World War II Memorial to pay homage to their fallen comrades. However, the US federal government shutdown proved to be an obstacle to their tribute, because it meant the clo-sure of the war memorial. They had travelled from Mississippi as part of the Honor Flight program, which, as the Washington Post explains, helps veterans across

the US travel for free to visit the memorial. The group had paid $80,000 to charter an airplane, and plans were too far along to postpone when the government shut down. War memorials be-long to the public, especially those who served their coun-try. What kind of a government would close a memorial when it was known that a group of veter-ans was coming?

11features editor Max Hillemail / phone features@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560FEATURES October 7, 2013

“I think it was a fluke,” laughs Maeghan Hermansson, as she explains how she became pres-ident of Kappa Beta Gamma, one of the few Greek letter or-ganizations at SFU. “My older brother, who is in the fraternity at the University of Victoria, got me in touch with [their so-rority]. At the time, I thought, ‘oh, Kappa seems like a good fit for SFU.’”

Maeghan claims she was “super shy in high school.” Coming from a graduating class of only 130 people, com-munity has always been a large part of her education. When it came to university, SFU was the only fit for Maeghan. “I missed the city,” she admits.

As someone who enjoys helping people, she knew that the school’s Health Science de-partment would feed her desire to do so. “A big thing for me is the ability to learn how policy works, taking classes on men-tal health [and] infectious dis-eases,” she explains. “It’s just kind of cool to put all of the aspects together instead of just looking at the one principle.”

Maeghan understands that there are many ways to help people, which is why creating the Alpha Gamma chapter of KBG was so important to her. “It’s so frightening to not know anybody . . . you make friends in class, but after the semester is over you don’t really see them anymore.” Maeghan wanted to change that. She understands that “joining a sorority isn’t for everybody,” but she admits that doing so helps “you break out of your shell.”

Overall she believes it is “nice to have that support sys-tem around you for all the things you do.” She found it hard when people around her would talk about transferring to a different school — they would tell her that they wanted to go and “have a blast at UVic.” She couldn’t help but think, “You could have a blast here!”

It’s the we that stands out most as Maeghan speaks of the sorority, one that she played a founding role in. “We are Kappa Beta Gamma,” she begins. “We also go by KBG. [There are] 17 active chapters, and we are

currently expanding in the States and in Canada.” The so-rority itself was founded in 1917 at Marquette University in Mar-quette, Milwaukee, with the aim to promote leadership skills for young women.

There were originally just 12 members, but KBG has ex-panded immensely, and has had an impact in the lives of many female SFU students. “We have girls from White Rock, Ladner, Coquitlam, and North Vancouver. We have girls that are international students . . . It doesn’t really matter where you come from, as long as you see yourself staying at SFU.”

Maeghan saw an opportu-nity for SFU to develop a bet-ter community around cam-pus. Starting the organization

wasn’t easy, and although Mae-ghan would “say [she] did a lot of the leg work” in the begin-ning, she would not have been able to do it without the help and support of the other girls. As she puts it, “It takes one per-

son to start something, but it takes so many more than that to finish it.”

So, the question remains: what exactly does Kappa Beta Gamma do? The president wants to put a stop to the idea that it’s just about socializing. “Yes, it is a social thing, you do make a lot of friends. But you also make professional con-nections.” Meaghan herself has been offered internships as a result of her involvement with the sorority. Volunteering is also an extremely important goal for these young ladies,

who meet regularly each se-mester to have a “brainstorm-ing session” to make sure ev-eryone is on the same page.

“Right now our goal is to get more involved in the commu-nity. We work with School Build-ing Schools. We have done a lot of volunteering with them . . . We were involved with Relay for Life last year with a bunch of other Greek letter organizations at SFU, as well as getting involved with the Special Olympics,” she says. “It’s so nice to see people of all abilities getting involved and having fun. Everybody is laugh-ing and having a good time, which is great.”

For Maeghan, the job has its own rewards. “I love help-ing people make friends,” she smiles. “We actually have a house full of girls who live to-gether, who met through the sorority, girls that went through rush this semester. Whether they found out that [our soror-ity] was for them or not, they met friends, and that’s a huge opportunity for everybody. Sometimes, it just takes that push to help make friends.”

Over the past few years, there have been some incredible and note-worthy art discoveries made by art conservators and happenstance archaeologists alike. Whether they’ve been forgotten amidst family heirlooms in attics and discovered decades later, or carted onto the set of Antiques Roadshow, these unexpected finds are more valuable than their appraised price tags: they suggest a whole iceberg of arts and culture just waiting to be found beneath the surface.

Antiques Roadshow is, more often than not, addled with less-than valuable tea sets and grand-father clocks, but for one woman in 2009, it proved to be worth the leap. The woman brought four ornately carved jade pieces to the show, including two dishes, a vase, and a sculpture. Lo and behold, the collection turned out to be a set of genuine antique Chinese pieces.

The woman’s father had been stationed in China in the 30s and 40s, acting as a liaison for the war. On the episode, she recounts tales told to her as a child from her father, who was just a “Kentucky farm boy.” According to her, he learned Chinese and met a Mr. Liang who lived at “number ten Jade Street.” She recalls her father telling her about how this Mr. Liang would call him over and say, “I have some pieces you might want to look at.”

Evidently, the friendship with Mr. Liang proved fruitful. After being appraised, it was discovered that the collection was worth over $1 million. The appraiser, James Callahan, an expert in Asian Arts, informed her that the pieces were all of very, very high quality.

One bowl’s design was based off of an Indian style, referred to as Mogul, and dates back to the 18th century. Another piece is set with a ruby, a carving of an animal-like creature called a bixie, which was thought to ward off evil. Another piece is inscribed with “by imperial order” on the bottom, indicat-ing that it was made specifically for the emperor.

Callahan suggested they date back to the Qianlong pe-riod during the years 1736 to 1795, and probably belonged to Emperor Qianlong himself. Callahan called it the best thing he’d ever seen on Roadshow.

A new van Gogh painting has very re-cently been discovered, more than 120 years after the painter’s death. The stunning landscape paint-ing — having spent most of its life hidden away under sheaths of dust in a Norwe-gian attic — was originally thought to be a fake.

This discovery is particu-larly astonishing because the work is from the same period as some of van Gogh’s great-est, such as The Yellow House and Sunflowers — a period when the artist was living in Arles in southern France.

Experts from the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam have called the discovery “abso-lutely sensational,” “a once in a lifetime experience,” have said that and that “a discovery of this magnitude has never before occurred in the history of the Van Gogh Museum.” Indeed, the discovery of the painting — titled Sunset at Montmajour — is a tremen-dous addition to the oeuvre of the famous painter. Mont-majour depicts the bright countryside of Arles, where van Gogh was working during the time, in shades of mus-tard and vivid green; a ruined

a b b e y dots the hillside in the distance.

The story be-hind the discovery is a common thread: the original owner of the painting had his doubts about its legiti-macy, and so — rather than face embarrassment by his peers for being in possession of a phony — he thrust the painting up into the attic, where it would sit for years, untouched.

The owner, Christian Nicolai Mustad, a Norwe-gian industrialist, bought the painting in 1908 upon the suggestion of art historian Jens Thiis, the director of the National Museum in Oslo at the time. A French ambas-sador later visited Mustad, wryly insinuating the paint-ing was either a fake or wrongly attributed. With the

number of forgeries floating around during the time, Mus-tad became wary and rather than research the painting, he hid it away, to be kept from art admirers and collec-tors until this year.

Mustad passed away in 1970, and the painting has been rejected as a fake sev-eral times since, but after ex-tensive research into the style and technique, experts are fi-nally comfortable calling it an official work by van Gogh. As of September 24, the painting has been put up on display as part of a “Van Gogh at Work” exhibit at the museum.

2010 was a remarkable year for art discoveries, including a work by Renaissance master Caravaggio. On the 400th anniversary of the painter’s death, the Vatican sug-gested that a previously unattrib-uted painting, found among their archives and titled Martyrdom of Saint Lawrence, may actually be a work by the revered artist.

The painting, property of the Je-suit Order, depicts the young Saint Lawrence, loincloth-clad, crying out in pain as he is roasted over a grate. While the Vatican did con-cede that more information was needed to confirm the attribution, there were some who remained un-convinced of the work’s merit.

According to an article by The Telegraph, Antonio Pinelli, an art historian from Florence, suggested that the work was more likely by one of Caravaggio’s followers, not by the master himself. He claimed that the texture of the skin and the execution of the loin cloth were poor, and that the “blue rag is really a very poor thing.”

Whether or not the piece can rightfully be attributed to Caravag-gio is still up in the air, but the 400th anniversary seems a suspiciously convenient time for this discovery to surface.

Ever wondered what a young, naked Sean Connery must have looked like? Wonder no longer!

An oil painting of the young 007 has been found in a Scottish art-ist’s home. The artist, Rab Webster, from the Scottish Borders, died in 2010 at the age of 83, and, when his family went about cleaning up his things, they discovered stacks upon stacks of old canvases. Web-ster, who worked as an art teacher before his death, had a large col-lection of previously unseen works, among them the brushstroke-per-fected tush of Mr. Connery.

Connery, before landing his breakthrough gig as Mr. Shaken-Not-Stirred, worked as an artist’s model at the Edinburgh College of Art. Nick Behel, a family member of Webster, noted in an article in The Telegraph that “[Webster] said Con-nery treated it just as a job and that he didn’t say very much.”

FRIDAY OCTOBER 25 , 2013Presented by Eaton Educational Group At the Westin Bayshore Hotel, Vancouver, BC

Educators, parents, psychologists, counsellors, speech language pathologists, occupational therapists, Faculty of Education students and anyone interested in the connections between the fields of education and neuroscience are welcome to register to hear this amazing line-up of speakers.

DR. JUSTIN DAVIS

Bonus Session: Brain Basics

DR. MAX CYNADER

Morning Keynote: Maximizing the Potential of the Brain

DR. JOHN RATEY

Exercise is Medicine for the Brain

DR. J. BRAD HALE

Teaching Changes Brain Function: How Neuroscience Will Revolutionize Education

BARBARA ARROWSMITH YOUNG (MA)

The Intimate Connection Between Mental Health Issues and Learning Disabilities

DR. GABOR MATÉ

Afternoon Keynote: From Emotion to Cognition: Love As The Ground For Learning

DR. RICK HANSON

Hardwiring Happiness: Growing Inner Strengths in Children, Parents, and Teachers

SPEAKERS:

Register at: www.neuroplasticityandeducation.com

EA

TO

N E D U C ATION

AL

GROUP LTD

Improving Cognitive Functioning

HO

STS

:

7:00am – 5:30pm

There are virtually no paintings remain-ing from the Hellenistic period (321

BC–31 BC), save for a few frag-ments hinting at the composi-

tion and colours used by the decadent ancient Greek

and Mediterranean cul-tures. Recently though,

a work has been dis-covered and restored at the world heritage site at Petra, Jordan, one of the world’s most famous ar-chaeological sites.

The location, most famous for its mix of ancient eastern traditions

and Hellenistic ar-chitecture, can now

also claim 2,000 year-old — circa the first cen-

tury Anno Domini, if not older — Hellenistic-style

wall paintings.

The paintings were found by British conservation specialists who, at the urg-ing of the Petra National Trust, recovered the works over three years, removing thou-sands of years’ worth of soot, grease and graffiti. Experts have called the discovery “exceptional,” and have even claimed that the uncovered paintings are superior to some Roman works at Herculaneum, the ancient Roman town that was destroyed by volcanic activity in 79 AD.

The realistic depictions of life in the paintings are so vivid that specific species of flowers, birds and insects have been iden-tified. The images include three different vines of grape, ivy and bindweed, the latter of which is associated with the Greek god of wine, Dionysus.

There are also depictions of a demoi-selle crane and a Palestinian sunbird, all done in vivid colours. The paintings are thought to be done by the Nabataeans, a group of people who traded with the Greek, Roman, and Egyptian empires, and whose land stretched from Damascus to the Red Sea, and Sinai to the Arabian desert.

The story goes that a woman left her apartment for the south of France before World War II, but she continued to diligently pay her rent for decades after. When she died at the age of 91, her apartment was finally opened up, after 70 years of being closed off. Those who were left to dis-assemble her dusty belongings were astonished to find a large painting of a woman in a rose-coloured dress.

As it turns out, the painting was discovered to be by the re-nowned Italian artist Boldini, and — get this — the subject of the painting was actually the grand-mother of the woman who previ-ously inhabited the apartment.

Tucked into a book amidst Boldini’s preserved belong-ings was a love note written by Boldini himself, as well as a reference to the date of the painting, 1898, proving its au-thenticity. The painting had, evidently, never been listed or exhibited. It sold at an auction for nearly $3 million.

In 2010, 271 new works by Picasso were dis-covered in Paris. Pierre Le Guennec, a 71-year old retired electrician, was ar-rested by French police officers when it was found that the unlikely art collector was in possession of hundreds of never-before-seen works

by the cubist master.The works, dated

between 1900 and 1932, include portraits

of Picasso’s first wife, Olga, nine cubist collages valued

at 40 million euros, a water-colour from his “blue” period, as

well as around 30 lithographs and 200-odd drawings.The works were at first thought to be

fakes, but art experts have suggested that

there’s no way that a counterfeiter could have copied the wide range of styles found in the collection. Le Guennec claimed that the works were gifts from Picasso in return for odd jobs performed around his Côte d’Azur home and studio, but the Picasso family said that the story seems unlikely, as none of the pieces were dated, some-thing Picasso never omitted when gifting his work.

According to an article published by The Telegraph, Picasso’s son Claude said: “To give such a large quantity (away) frankly doesn’t stand up. It was part of his life . . . he always dated, signed and wrote dedications in his gifts, knowing that some people would go on to sell them to meet their needs.”

Le Guennec later changed his story, suggesting that the works were a gift from Picasso’s second wife, Jacqueline Roque, who committed suicide in 1986. The fate of the works hang in the balance, as it was last reported that the rightful possession of the drawings and paintings would be deter-mined in a legal battle.

14 arts editor Daryn Wrightemail / phone arts@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560ARTS October 7, 2013

The Bones of What You Believe is a lot of fun. It’s catchy, danceable and ticks the appropriate boxes on the List of Musical Influences. If you’re searching for a new album to listen to while you passively browse Facebook or lift weights at the gym, look no further: this Scottish trio is the group you’ve been looking for. They even have an appropriately non-threat-ening lead vocalist who looks a little bit like that girl you had a crush on in sev-enth grade.

The problem is that, as the Barenaked Ladies once said, it’s all been done. Ch-vrches are adequately talented, and they clearly have an ear for hooks. Opener

“The Mother We Share” and single “Re-cover” are sure to be mainstays on your local indie station, and rightfully so. But are they saying anything new? I think you already know the answer.

There’s something to be said for the album’s immaculate production: these mixes are so squeaky clean, listening to The Bones of What You Believe feels like going through a car wash. Not a single guitar is plucked throughout the LP’s 16 tracks, but the group’s repertoire of bleeps and bloops are more than enough to make up for the absence.

Even lead vocalist Lauren Mayber-ry’s voice feels obsessively microman-aged, equal parts socially acceptable quirkiness and milquetoast lyrical cli-chés. (Though, to her credit, Mayberry recently penned a damning op ed in The Guardian about online sexism towards female musicians. So there’s that.)

On its surface, The Bones of What You Believe is a perfectly enjoyable and ef-fortlessly marketable slice of pop music pie — maybe a little on the long side, but far from bloated. Still, it’s hard to get excited about amiable, derivative synth pop anymore. Like so many albums before it and many more to come, Ch-vrches’ debut full length is just another step into the brave new world of indie pop homogenization.

“Back in the days when I was a teen-ager, before I had status and before I had a pager . . .”

From Q-Tip’s first couplet in album opener “Excursions,” I was hooked. Like many other hesitant hip-hop lis-teners, The Low End Theory — A Tribe

Called Quest’s sophomore opus and the Rosetta Stone of jazz hop — was my rap gateway drug. Effortlessly listen-able and calmly anecdotal, the trio’s second LP was the antithesis of Pub-lic Enemy’s political manifestos: Q-Tip and his partner Phife Dawg kept their ideologies subtextual, preferring to focus on the wiles of rap promoters and the opposite sex.

Though many had noted the paral-lels between jazz and hip-hop before, The Low End Theory was the first record to truly fuse them into one pulsing, co-hesive whole. From its stand-up bass grooves to DJ Ali Shaheed Muham-mad’s pitch perfect bebop samples, the LP’s atmosphere is warm and invit-ing. The group’s twin MCs maintain a lively equilibrium: Q-Tip’s lyrical tal-ent shines through his gentle cadence, while Phife Dawg’s youthful bombast is grounded by his seamless syllabary.

Despite its apolitical nature, The Low End Theory is anything but deli-cate. Few hip-hop albums are as quot-able: each stanza stacks reference upon reference in an endless circle of one-upmanship between the group’s leads. The result is some of rap’s finest

Danny Brown’s stream of conscious-ness style and obscene wordplay have won him a legion of admirers since he burst onto Detroit’s emaciated rap scene a few years ago. Old, his first proper studio LP and the succes-sor to his wildly popular free release XXX, paints a more complete portrait of Brown than we’ve seen so far. For every lewd sex joke and over-the-top boast, the rapper’s newest features an admission of loneliness or a plea for nonviolence.

By striking a precarious balance between youthful abandon and cin-ematic gravitas, Old obnoxiously

announces itself as a frontrunner for hip-hop album of the year. After months of arguments with label heads and studio tinkering, the build-up proved to be worth it — the produc-tion is immaculate, from the indus-trial grind of “Way Up Here” to the ambulance synths of “Break It (Go)” to the muted R&B of “The Return,” Old is an inventive sound collage that never gets, well, you know.

Brown’s lyrics are similarly all over the place: “Handstand” may be the most depraved fornication fantasy the rapper has cooked up to date, while “Wonderbread” is, as far as I can tell, a song about purchasing sliced bread (with pan flute accompaniment). “Torture” features Brown’s most vul-nerable verses committed to tape, while “Red 2 Go” is an aggressive call to arms for listeners and rivals alike.

Old’s saving grace is Brown’s versa-tility: his raps range from smooth and melodic to harebrained and manic, sometimes within the same stanza. Some will argue that Old tries to do too much, and there’s something to be said about the album’s overzeal-ous attention span. But it’s hard to deny that Brown is one of hip-hop’s strangest, funniest and most creative figures, and Old proves that he’s even more versatile than we thought.

wordplay, all against a backdrop of smoky jazz instrumentation and de-ceptively simple drum beats.

Despite their casual rivalry, Tip and Phife were never more in sync than on this LP. “Check the Rhime,” the album’s centerpiece and the group’s strongest track, sees the two trading verses without

missing a beat. Though their differences would eventually lead the group to split in 1998, The Low End Theory is the high point of the duo’s professional partnership.

This is the album to try if you’re new to the genre: if you’re not a convert by the last chorus of “Scenario,” you might as well stick with Coldplay.

15ARTS October 7, 2013

BAWA  SINGH’S  GARDEN

A  poem  2630  lines  long

ByDr.  Gurdev  S.  BoparaiAn  e-­‐book  at  Amazon/Kindle  for  $5

16 ARTS October 7, 2013

The Grand Theft Auto franchise has always been a haven for con-troversy, innovation, and ambi-tion. Creating a world where a player can roam freely and par-ticipate in nearly any illegal activ-ity that they can think of is what has made the series so popular, but it’s also what has spawned the most public outcry.

Grand Theft Auto V still pro-vides plenty of reasons to get the pitchforks out, but the off-beat, tongue-in-cheek humour that the series is known for helps to alleviate the offensive-ness and create a biting satire of America, as well as a pretty great game.

With any Grand Theft Auto, the focus is generally on one pro-tagonist and his rise within the

criminal underworld. Right out of the gate, GTA V changes up the formula by having three protago-nists, each with their own char-acter arcs and unique person-alities. The three leads (Michael, Franklin and Trevor) all have one thing in common: they are des-tined to a life of crime.

Michael gets out and is brought back in; Franklin as-pires to make something of himself outside of gangbang-ing; and Trevor is an uncontrol-lable, unstable psychopath. The chemistry between the three is electric, and the three-person narrative comes together to form an interesting, cohesive story that stands above many of the other games released dur-ing this console cycle.

The mechanics of the game have not changed much since Grand Theft Auto IV, but there are some noteworthy additions and tweaks that make the game more engaging than previous iterations. Most satisfying for myself is the driving, which has become less realistic, but more fun as a result. Another new aspect is the ability to switch between the three main char-acters at any time off-mission, with certain missions being tai-lored to specific characters.

Each character also has his own special ability (i.e Trevor can take inhuman amounts of dam-age) which makes the game a bit too easy. The forgiveness in GTA V can really be felt in the imple-mentation of checkpoints during missions which means no more having to replay a mission from the very beginning again.

By going for a less realistic approach, Rockstar has elimi-nated a lot of the difficulty in the game, which is both wel-coming for those who could never finish the games, and

infuriating for those who want a challenge.

Main missions aside, GTA V should be able to attract new play-ers to the series with its inclusion of plenty of extracurricular activi-ties like golfing, tennis, drag rac-ing, hunting, and more, as well as instant access to the entire map

of Los Santos. There is no limit to what you can do in GTA V. The co-lourful cast and narrative will keep some intrigued, but the massive scope of the game will prevent many players from progressing through the story, as they drive through Los Santos simply admir-ing the far-reaching vistas.

Mamie Taylor’s is a modern American-style restaurant lo-cated in Chinatown, and be-sides offering tons of yummy food and drinks, the joint is also stuffed with taxidermy (pun intended). If you’re look-ing for something simple but hearty, try their corn bread and biscuits with jalapeño butter, or the white cheddar grits with grilled mushrooms, fava beans and bread crumbs. Or if you’re really hungry, order the pork chops with bacon wrapped apples and roasted kale. Consider pair-ing those yums with a cock-tail or two, like the Aviation (gin, maraschino, lemon, and liqueur de violette).

Come out to The Cobalt this Sunday, Oct. 13 for a performance by Har Mar Superstar, Sex With Strangers, and Looks to Kill. Har Mar is releasing his latest album, Bye Bye 17, which follows the mu-sical traditions of James Brown, Otis Redding and Sam Cooke. The guy has a huge personality and puts on an incredible show. I know it’s Thanksgiving, but why not stuff your face with turkey, then stuff your head with music, and give thanks to the music gods. Tickets are $10 in advance and $12 at the door, which opens at 8 p.m.

The Visible Verse Festival kicks off this Saturday, Oct. 12, at The Cinematheque. The theatre’s annual festival of video poetry and film re-turns, this year curated and hosted by Heather Haley, a poet, author, musician and media artist. The festival in-tegrates verse with media arts visuals produced by a camera or a computer. This year, more than 200 en-tries were received from all over the world and 37 have been chosen by Haley to be screened. R.W. Perkins, a Colorado poet and film-maker, will also give a talk on poetry and filmmaking.

Poetry is Dead is launch-ing its eighth issue, “The Sound Issue”, Thursday, Oct. 10. This same night will also be the launch of Jordan Abel’s first book of poetry titled The Place of Scraps. Taking place at Western Front, located at E 8th Ave, the evening will include readings by Lau-ren Kresowaty, Elee Kraljii Gardiner, Karen Correia Da Silva, Kevin McNeilly, and Andrew McEwan. Copies of the magazine are available for $5, and subscriptions for $10. There will also be a live DJ’d sound poem made from sound clips of the au-dience, performed by Dan-iel Zomparelli.

Are you stressed about mid-terms? Do you need some giggles, or even some belly-shaking laughs? Check out Calabash Bistro’s Funny Talk, an evening of stand up com-edy and music, taking place on Wednesday, Oct. 9. This edition of the show will fea-ture Graham Clark, who’s been featured on Reader’s Digest King of Comedy edition; Sunee Dhaliwal from Just for Laughs and Comedy Now; and Katie-Ellen Humphries from the Bridge Port Fest and Bumber-shoot Fest. The special musi-cal guest this time around will be Kate Alexandra Morgan. If that isn’t enough to get you excited, Calabash Bistro also has an amazing poutine and spicy-as-heck ginger beer.

17ARTS October 7, 2013

Tracy Stefanucci is a powerhouse of creativity. Not only has she been publishing a magazine since 2006, but she also operates a local artist-run space, and is now producing an annual art book fair.

“A book fair is something that our organization has mused over for many years,” writes Stefanucci, catching spare moments between tasks to respond to my questions via email. “However, the idea for an art book fair began to take shape in 2010.

“We discovered that we were no longer creating a literary maga-zine and were actually creating an artist magazine.” Now called OCW Magazine, the former “vancouver-logue” of art and writing is a corner-stone of Vancouver’s artistic voice and creative community. How-ever, since 2011, it has become an intermittently published platform for the curatorial interests of Stefa-nucci and her partner, Jaz Halloran. The magazine, published by the non-profit OCW Arts & Publishing

Foundation, also runs Project Space, a bookshop, publisher, and alternative art space in Chinatown.

While Stefanucci credits local book fairs like Word Vancouver and Canzine West for enriching the local literary landscape, she could still see a “glaring gap for publishing grounded in a visual arts context.” In fact, when Stefanucci started planning the first Vancouver Art/Book Fair in 2011, there was no

other international art book fair in Canada or on the West Coast, so she travelled to the New York Art Book Fair to research possibilities for a Vancouver fair.

This past weekend, on Oct. 5 and 6, the second annual Van-couver Art/Book Fair (VA/BF) took over part of the Vancouver Art Gal-lery. The fair has expanded to a two-day festival of artists’ publish-ing featuring nearly 100 exhibitors,

workshops and programs, perfor-mances and installations.

“There is artist publishing being produced by artist-run cen-tres, individual artists and photog-raphers, artist collectives, graphic designers and writers,” lists Ste-fanucci. “We try to capture this spectrum at VA / BF, and we also try to capture a range of the forms a ‘book’ can take: a traditional paper and ink booklet or piece of print ephemera, a magazine, a zine, an in-person engagement, multimedia, etc.”

The programming included diversity and variety, as Stefanucci managed to host speakers from as

near as Victoria or San Francisco, to more distant places such as Man-chester, Stockholm, and Istanbul. “We have presenters who centre their art practices on publishing and others who publish alongside graphic design studios or who identify primarily as writers . . . fe-male, queer and aboriginal artists are represented. And the programs themselves vary from perfor-mances and artist talks to panels, workshops and installations.”

VA / BF featured three rooms full of exhibitors who are “local, na-tional and international publishers of books, magazines, zines, printed ephemera and digital or other ex-perimental forms of publication.”

Jason Vanderhill, creator of local blog Illustrated Vancouver, believes the vast array of exhibi-tors was one of the best parts of the weekend. “You don’t always get to see these art indie publica-tions all in one place,” says Van-derhill. “So you might see a hand-ful or a small sampling at Blim or Canzine West or the Art Gallery, but it’s a unique moment when they all converge.”

Running parallel with VA / BF was the Artists’ Books Weekend. Inspired by the London-based Arists’ Books Weekend, Stefa-nucci described ABW as an event series programmed by the com-munity — any organizations, cu-rators, publishers, artists, or art-ist-run centres can host an event in celebration of artist publishing and post it to the ABW webpage. It’s one of the ways they are en-couraging the local community to get involved.

As one of VA / BF’s goals is to foster greater visibility for artist publishing and artists working in this medium, the fair continues to remain free and open to the public. “There is always room for improve-ment,” admits Stefanucci, “but for our second year I am really pleased with our ability to create space for so many voices and practices.”

18 sports editor Adam Ovenell-Carteremail / phone sports@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560SPORTS October 7, 2013

It was a nice change of scenery for the SFU cross-country teams, getting out of the Vancouver rain and racing under the California sun. But for both the men’s and women’s sides, the re-sults of their races at the Stanford Invitational were quite familiar.

Racing against some of the top competition in both the National Collegiate Athletic As-sociation’s Division I and II pro-grams, the Clan men finished seventh and the women second at the Invitational.

Lindsey Butterworth, a senior on the squad and the women’s captain, led the way for the Clan finishing 35th in the 5km race, with a time of 22:40. Kirsten Allen finished second for the Clan, with a time of 22:54, and teammate Kansas Macken-zie was right behind her, fin-ishing 46th in 22:55.

Nanaimo native Rebecca Bassett, a freshman, and sophomore Emma Chadsey filled out the top five for the Clan women, finishing 61st and 74th respectively.

After three strong fin-ishes to start the cross-country season, the Clan will get a week off from competition before heading to Bellingham, WA for the Western Washington Tune-up next week.

“We’ve been very consis-tent through the first three races and it will be good to get a week off from racing and have a hard week of training,” said Butterworth. “We are excited to see what we can accomplish at our

conference meet and re-gionals after that.”

The week off will be used as a chance for improvement.

“I know the women can be better,” said head coach Bit Townsend. “The women were only 10 points behind first-place Chico State. With a week off and a hard week of training, they will be motivated to get things going.”

Meanwhile, it was a freshman leading the Clan men in their seventh-place finish. Chilliwack’s Oliver Jorgensen, finishing the 6km race in 26:28, placed 76th. Finishing only four seconds behind him was senior team captain James Young, who finished 87th with 26:32.

“Overall we ran well con-sidering we have raced three weeks in a row,” said Young, as his men’s side prepares for their first 10km race of the season in Bellingham. “Moving forward we are ex-cited to do a 10km and are hoping to close the gap be-tween our top five runners.”

Austin Trapp, Cameron Proceviat, and Ephraim Tadesse rounded out that top-five.

“I’m very happy with how our men competed. This was a really tough race. We have had some sickness and nag-ging injuries that we hope will sort itself out with a week off,” said Townsend. “The Stanford Invitational is one of the top meets in the nation and by racing here, it makes us men-tally tougher.”

That, with a week off to prepare for their next race, points to improvement on an already successful start to the 2013 season.

After a breakthrough non-con-ference season the Clan wom-en’s volleyball team struggled to get things going in their Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC) openers, in Montana and Seattle.

The SFU ladies opened strong in their first game, taking the first set against Seattle Pa-cific University, 25–16. Unfortu-nately, they would not be able to hold the momentum, dropping the next three sets straight. Ag-gressive play by left side Kelsey Robinson and libero Alanna Chan with 14 kills and 13 digs in the game respectively, put the Clan within striking distance in the fourth set but they ultimately dropped the match 3–1.

The game also saw the re-turn of sophomore setter Tamara Nipp who was injured in the non

conference season and recorded 12 assists in the match. Her re-turn allowed the team to play a 6–2 rotation as opposed to the 5–1 they had been running with a sole setter.

After winning five straight to go 5–1 in the non-conference season, the loss was a disap-pointing way to open the con-ference schedule, but the team showed improved poise and confidence from the past few seasons, battling for every point.

Two days after the loss to SPU, the Clan visited Montana State University-Billings, who proved even tougher competi-tion beating the visitors in three straight sets.

Robinson again led the Clan’s effort with 10 kills while Chan recorded eight digs. Transfer setter Brooklyn Gould-Bradbury

had 42 assists between the two matches working in tandem with Nipp.

“We are still coming together and that takes time,” said Chan following the team’s return to Burnaby. “It’s important after a loss like that to have a short memory as our assistant coach Kim [Stonehouse] always tells us. We just need to focus on the next games and the new scenar-ios they will bring.”

Looking ahead, the ladies will be focusing on recording their first conference win of 2013, as they aim to improve on their dis-mal record from last year.

“It’s great having our new coaching staff, Gina has so much experience playing as well as coaching and connects very well with us,” continued Chan. “After the weekend she didn’t make us feel bad about the games but encouraged us to focus and prepare on the bat-tles ahead.”

The Clan return home to host three games at the West Gym be-fore hitting the road again as the quest for the season’s first GNAC win continues.

19SPORTS October 7, 2013

Does Misinformation Demobilize the Electorate? Measuring the Impact Of “Robocalls” on the 2011 Canadian Federal Election

Tuesday, October 15 | 7 pmMorris J Wosk Centre for Dialogue580 West Hastings Street, Vancouver(enter from Seymour Street courtyard)

ANKE KESSLER joined SFU’s Department of Economics in 2003 and holds a PhD from the University of Bonn, Germany, specializing in organizational design. Combining elements of public economics and political economics with contract theory, her current research focuses on the design of public institutions.

STERLING PRIZE IN SUPPORT OF CONTROVERSY RECIPIENT

SFU: Sterling Prize Lecture 2013Peak(6x8”)

Oct 2012

PUBLIC LEC TURE

This event is free, but seating is limited. Please reserve online at www.sfu.ca/reserve.

Reception follows.

WWW.SFU.CA/STERLINGPRIZE

Dr. Anke Kessler

SPONSORED BY THE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC

Alan Koch, head coach of SFU’s men’s soccer team, will be the first to tell you how little rank-ings and pre-game hype mean to any given game. His Clan worked hard to climb the National Soc-cer Coaches Association of America (NSCAA) rankings, from the third spot entering last sea-son to first place late last week. But, after a dominant 8–0 start to the season, including a pair of victories at home last week over two South Dakota-based schools, the Clan finally suffered their first defeat.

Things were going fantasti-cally for the Clan — they hadn’t just been winning games, but trouncing their opponents. In their conference home opener, SFU trumped the South Dakota School of Mines, a school in their first year of Great Northwest Ath-letic Conference (GNAC) play, 5–0 a score that, given the bal-ance of play, could’ve been even more lopsided.

“The chemistry is really coming along,” said midfielder Adam Staschuk post-game, as five different players found the back of the net for the Clan. “Everyone is starting to buy into the system. We are all getting more comfortable with it and it showed tonight.”

That comfort showed in their second game of the week: SFU shut out the University of Mary Marauders 6–0 in the Clan’s sec-ond home game of the week.

“A lot of guys got to play to-night and it really showed our depth,” said Alexander Kleefeldt, a transfer from Germany in his first season with the Clan, after the match. He also tallied the second and sixth goals of the game for the Clan.

“In the first half we should have kept possession a little bit more. The result is good but I still think we can play better, keep possession more and keep our opposition down.

“It was good to score two goals but I think I could have

done a better job on the defen-sive end. The next road trip is going to be difficult so we need to step it up and work hard to be prepared,” he finished.

Until the start of that road trip, the Clan had faced little ad-versity, save for a pair of come-from-behind victories on the road earlier in the season. But there was no doubt that the Clan were in for their biggest test of the season on the road against Seattle Pacific University — ar-guably SFU’s biggest rival since entering the GNAC.

Seattle Pacific opened the scoring early, before junior mid-fielder Chris Bargholz tied the game at one apiece in the 23rd minute. The score would stay the same until late in the second half when the Falcons would scrape ahead 2–1 in the 79th minute — a deficit the Clan could not overcome; the game would finish with a 2–1 score for SPU.

Call it an upset if you want, but Koch will tell you his squad beat themselves.

“Tonight we didn’t score on the chances that we created and this allowed SPU to grow more and more confident as the match progressed,” he said after the Thursday night game.

“Big games are won and lost by little things. We made some unnecessary mistakes tonight that really hurt us.”

Despite the loss, the Clan are still set up well to compete for a GNAC title. The loss drops the Clan’s record to 8–1, still very much good enough for first in the conference, while second-place SPU improves to 6–1–1. And the Clan still lead the con-ference in goals by a shockingly wide margin: 33 for SFU com-pared to 14 for Western Wash-ington, second in that category. The Clan have all the tools to get back on track.

“We need to regroup and in-crease our collective focus ahead of our next match against Saint Martin’s,” said Koch. “This con-ference championship is going to be a dogfight to the end.”

20 SPORTS October 7, 2013

Things started out well enough for the SFU football team in their home opener on Sept. 28. The Clan jumped out to an early lead, had a couple of long drives deep into Western Oregon territory, and for a long while stymied the WOU Wolves offence.

Then, like the weather the game was played in, things got messy.

The Clan would twice drive into the red zone, before being forced to kick field goals. On a third offensive opportunity from inside the Wolves’ 20-yard line, quarterback Ryan Stanford threw an interception. In horizontal rain and droves of fog, the Clan strug-gled to put points on the board when they had the chance — mis-takes that would cost the team later in their home opener when their opposition found ways to score touchdowns.

Granted, the Wolves had lots of help from the Clan: SFU took 11 penalties for a whopping 117 yards in the game (by comparison, Clan running back Chris Tolbert ran for 112 yards in the contest). Big penalties — pass interference calls, personal fouls, and a rough-ing the kicker penalty — gave WOU plenty of second chances on third- and even fourth-downs. No matter who the opponent, give a team that many chances and they will capitalize.

“The penalties we took and the response to some guys having to miss plays wasn’t the image of Clan Football,” said head coach Dave Johnson. “Western Oregon is a good enough team that if we make mistakes we’re going to get a result like we did today.”

The result was the Clan’s of-fense being kept on the sidelines while the Wolves were handed

extra plays. The Clan scored only three points in the second half, while WOU scored three touchdowns. The result was a 30–9 loss, the Clan’s first defeat of the season.

But it wasn’t the football team’s only loss of the day. Adding injury to insult, Stanford, who had been a star for the Clan early in his first season with the team, was forced out of the game with an appar-ent shoulder injury. After rolling to

his right on a play, he was belted by a defender for a sack — but when the defender got up off the ground, Stanford didn’t.

Clutching his shoulder, he was eventually helped to the side-lines before having his arm put in a sling. It’s unknown how long the injury will keep him out — he didn’t play this past weekend at Dixie State — but after already los-ing superstar wideout Lemar Du-rant to an ankle injury in Week 1,

the Clan can ill-afford to lose their starting quarterback.

That said, head coach Dave Johnson is no stranger to in-juries and adversity and steps were made this offseason to help ensure the team’s success. Of course, only time will tell whether Johnson and company can cope with the losses of players, but if the Clan can’t stop beating them-selves, it will be tough to keep the losses off the score sheet.

To say the SFU and UBC hockey teams do not like each other would be an understatement. The two clubs met in the Third Annual University Hockey Clas-sic, a home and home series over the weekend, which featured plenty of high flying action and bone-crushing hits. Unfortu-nately for SFU, their crosstown rivals would sweep the two-game series in convincing fashion.

The first game took place at UBC’s home rink, the Doug Mitchell Thunderbird Sports Centre. SFU potted the first goal of the night, when Nick Sandor converted a pass from Jono Ceci. Although UBC controlled most of the period, outshooting the Clan

12-7, it was the away team head-ing to the locker rooms up by a 1-0 score.

The second period however, was a different story. The Thun-derbirds struck just 17 seconds into the frame when Dillon Wag-ner broke in off a textbook break-out and fired a top corner rocket. Wagner’s goal was the first of five in a ten-minute span for UBC as

SFU couldn’t find their legs and were constantly second to the puck and losing battles along the boards. SFU eventually began moving their feet and finished off the latter half of the period strong.

The Clan’s Aaron Enns scored one of the prettier goals you’ll see all season to begin the third, breaking in one-on-one with a T-Bird defenseman, turning him

inside out and finishing with a slick backhand. Enns’ effort was much too little too late however, as a sloppy 10-minute stretch re-sulted in a 6-2 victory for UBC.

The bad blood spilled over into Saturday when both teams took to the ice at Bill Copeland Sports Centre, SFU’s home rink. After almost every whistle, a scrum en-sued between the two sides, but the scoreboard reflected the pre-vious game; UBC flew around the ice, winning most of the battles along the boards.

UBC scored the first goal of the night 5:34 into the first pe-riod, off of a good transition, which resulted in an easy tap in for Scott Macdonald. The T-Birds found no problems skat-ing through the neutral zone as their second goal came off a two-on-one. The away team added a short-handed goal late to take a 3-0 lead after one.

SFU was caught flat-footed in the middle frame for the second straight night and UBC was re-warded with a Greg Fraser goal from a sharp angle.

The rough stuff really started to pick up late as the scrums became more and more violent. It cost SFU: on UBC’s fifth goal, SFU’s Jesse Mysio-rek went in for a big hit, but his attempt resulted in a two on one chance down low, which found the puck in the back of the Clan’s net. SFU’s Enns scored his second goal in two nights on the power play late in the frame.

The lone win for the Clan over the weekend was a fight Trevor Esau took handedly, de-livering huge haymakers on UBC’s Ilan Cumberburch.

The third period ended with-out any additional scoring, with UBC heading home pocketing a decisive 5-1 victory.

The SFU hockey team heads to Boston next weekend to take on NCAA Div. I opponents and will look to bounce back from a tough weekend. This is a team still looking to find chemistry after adding 14 new players, and once they do, SFU will be back to winning hockey games.

21DIVERSIONS / ETC October 7, 2013

Across1- Field yield5- More cunning10- Understanding words14- Move labourously15- Synagogue scroll16- The closest one to us is the sun17- Unclean19- Boney M sang “__ __ Rasputin”20- Many21- Intestines23- Infuse25- Luster26- Great Lakes tribes-men28- Muslim teacher31- Henry VIII’s sixth34- Short letter36- What Luongo becomes during the playoffs37- Eisenhower nick-name38- Base or shameful40- Saint in Spanish41- Stopwatch-holder43- Wolf’s call44- What a snake says45- Hemoglobin defi-ciency

47- Marner’s creator49- Less51- On the loose55- The Cornhusker State58- Diner59- Olive genus60- Superintendent62- Chipper63- The L Word writer Chaiken64- Basic monetary unit of Ghana65- Gently place66- Respected aged one 67- Eye problem Down1- Hot stuff2- Babbled3- Deposes or forces to leave4- Calcined gypsum5- Suffocating

6- Destiny7- Dies ___8- Makes or deserves9- Beat10- Examples include Sharon and Netanyahu11- Resistant to staining12- ____ Grey, tea type13- Periods of history18- Chiaroscuro film genre22- Employ again24- Bleeding Love singer Lewis27- Mall unit29- Belongs to Ava30- Coop group31- Middle Eastern bread32- Related by blood33- Recalls35- Deadly virus38- One of Chekhov’s “Three Sisters”

39- Vagrant42- An Emir’s kingdom44- Science of bodies at rest46- Outback resident48- Norwegian king50- Cranium52- Do-over button53- Sleazy54- Eagle’s nest: var.55- Slang no56- Zeno’s home57- Imitated61- Closer to East than Northeast

Hope  to  see  you  there!

CLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CACLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CACLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CACLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CACLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CACLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CACLASSIFIEDS@THE-PEAK.CA

22 humour editor Brad McLeodemail / phone humour@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560HUMOUR October 7, 2013

NEW YORK — LGBTQ, the initialism which currently encompasses those who identify as lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender and questioning, is set to increase its letters more than two-fold by the year 2016, so say some prominent queer-activists.

Originally founded in the 1980s as “LGB,” the ini-tials eventually added “T” in the early nineties and the increasingly popular “Q” in the last decade. Now, many believe that serious letter expansions are on the way.

“The original three worked well for us in the old days but, at that time, we were really just trying to avoid being called other three-letter words” explained Carol Krantz, a Brooklyn queer-rights activist. “Now that we’re getting more accepted, though, we’ve got a chance to really complicate this term.”

Although it’s unclear what the letters will rep-resent, possible expansions that have been floated around include “I,” “W,” “R,” “P,” another “Q,” a third “Q,” and “H.”

“Of course we’d love to get a “Z” or an “X” in-volved but those are probably more long-term proj-ects,” Krantz said as she searched for more colours to add to her rainbow flag. “Ideally, I’d like to see it eventually be a 30 or 32 letter-word that includes all people but getting to 12 is a good step, it shows that we mean business.”

With their sights on 2016, Krantz and the few other people who are with her on her quest to make LGBTQI-WRPQQH a reality, have serious hopes that someday they will have a term that truly incorporates all people, hopefully without ever having to resort to just calling them “people.”

YKAMPALA — In an effort to raise awareness about the rising rate of obesity in America, citizens of Uganda are showing solidarity by refraining from any sort of physical activity for 30 straight hours; an event known as the ‘30 Hour No Sweat.’

A Ugandan spokesman for the charity told the press, “It’s all about making people in Uganda aware of the terrible issues that are taking place globally.”

“Right now a lot of people are suffering in Amer-ica from a lack of having to do any sort of physical activity at all and having too much food intake, and we need to raise this issue on Uganda’s moral con-science,” added the group’s spokesman.

Organizers of the charity say that the issues of low self-esteem and feeling uncomfortable in most standard-size chairs in cars, movie theatres, and airplanes are big concerns for the Ugandan charity.

“Some Americans want to go on vacation, but they don’t feel like it because the seats on most airplanes are slightly uncomfortable, and they are worried about people staring while they eat their in-flight meal. Something has to be done.”

Some are even taking their solidarity with Ameri-can social issues to the extreme by also partaking in the overeating of fatty, high-calorie foods and sugary soft drinks. “We want to show Americans that they are not alone in their pain,” said the spokesman.

The Ugandan charity will be raising money to build gyms in the state of Mississippi, where the obe-sity rate amongst adults is currently 31.7 per cent.

BUENOS AIRES — Despite being believed by many to have died years ago, a former “grammar nazi” has been found to be living in a remote town in Ar-gentina and, according to the man who caught him he “will be brought to justice for his annoyingness.”

Hal Lee, a 37 year-old man who graduated with an English degree from the University of Colorado, was once one of the most notorious correctors of minute grammatic details on his friends facebook posts before disappearing almost four years ago.

In 2010, when the term “grammar nazi”found its way into the popular lexicon and had already effectively destroyed all people like Lee, he was no-where to be found and since no one really bothered to inquire what happened to him, he was assumed to be dead.

But now, thanks to Grammar Nazi-Hunter, Dave Simpson, a man who has dedicated his weekends to tracking down grammar-nazis who didn’t pay their debt to society, Lee will finally be brought to justice.

According to reports, Lee didn’t seem all too remorseful when he was confronted by Simpson saying only that he “missed conversing with his friends online in America ever since he left to teach English to underprivileged children.”

While Lee has not participated in any grammar-nazi like behavior since he arrived in Argentina and has supposedly turned over a new leaf, Simpson has said he will still punish him severely and is busy working on a peeved e-mail to send him.

23October 7, 2013HUMOUR

BURNABY— One of SFU’s new-est clubs, the “Wizard’s Chess Club,” a club based on probably the most unimaginative activi-ties of the Harry Potter world, is complaining that they have expe-rienced significant bullying from members of the university’s pop-ular Quidditch team.

According to the SFU Wizard’s Chess Club’s president, Geoff Malone, their group has been the target of a lot of ridicule since they formed but nothing compares to the way the Quidditch team has treated them.

“It’s typical jock behaviour,” Malone explained during a rare moment of peace, “Just because they were blessed with the athletic ability to pretend to fly around on broomsticks they think they can do whatever they want, it sucks.”

Members of the WCC have told The Peak that they are hardly able to pretend a single piece is moving on its own across the board before they’re interrupted by some Quid-ditch meathead insulting them or knocking over their board.

“It’s really disappointing for us,” Malone told The Peak on be-half of all four of the club’s mem-bers, “most people would assume

that we would get along because of the Harry Potter connection but that’s ludacris, it’s like saying de-tectives would be best pals with people who play ‘Clue,’ no way, just like them we’re classic rivals.”

According to Malone, the Quidditch team has tormented the Wizard’s Chess Players in a number of ways.

From whipping them with towels, to stealing their clothes from their lockers, to hiding their equipment in the showers, the Quidditchers are ruthless, although even Malone admits

most of it could be avoided sim-ply by not sharing a locker room with them.

“They’re such cocky assholes” complained one WCC member who preferred not to be named, “I just want to play chess, while pretending I’m a wizard, is that really so weird?”

The unnamed student went on to say that their brutal harassment was having devastating effects on his life and that he had already missed two football practices out of fear that some Quidditch play-ers would find him and tease him.

Malone said that this sort of treatment didn’t even cross his mind when he decided to form a club based on a series of children’s fantasy novels and really wishes there was a place at SFU where students could enjoy the wizard-version of intellectual pursuits in-stead of just macho wizard sports.

“They act like they own the school, it’s ridiculous,” com-plained Malone. “I thought uni-versity would be different when it comes to these stupid cliques but no, just like in high school, the Quidditch team is allowed to do

whatever they want and every-one just turns a blind eye because they’re so goddamn popular.”

Malone went on to say that even though he wishes they would just leave him be, he’s still com-forted knowing that being on the Quidditch team is going to be the highlight of these peoples’ lives while he and his friends will surely go on to bigger and better things.

“People just don’t give Wiz-ard’s Chess enough credit” Malone complained in a disappointed tone, “even J.K. Rowling gave up on it after the first book and theer were plenty of moments that it could’ve come up . . . instead of the Tri-wizard tournament in the fourth book it could’ve been the ‘Wizard’s Chess Championship’ and instead of battling Voldemort in the seventh book why couldn’t Harry and Ron just have played Wizard’s Chess instead? That would’ve been a lot more fun . . .”

“We’ll show them though,” Malone continued trying not to think about how Wizard’s Chess is pretty much just regular chess, “today’s Wizard Chess players will be the people running the world tomorrow, meanwhile these Quid-ditch jocks will be working at some gas station, limping around from a bludger injury thinking of what could’ve been.”

At this point Malone whis-pered “it’s still barbaric though” referring to the Quidditch bullies’ harassment, “but I guess . . . that’s Wizard’s Chess.”

24 LAST WORD features editor Max Hillemail / phone features@the-peak.ca / 778.782.4560 October 7, 2013

he record-breaking re-lease of Grand Theft Auto V has sent ripples of controversy through

the media. Its explicit content has shocked and appalled many, but entertained thousands more.

Mainstream media has pin-pointed problematic elements of the game such as prostitu-tion, torture, and racial profil-ing. It seems that people like it: selling over $1 billion worth in the first week of sales, GTA V is breaking entertainment records worldwide.

Anyone who has dabbled in products developed by Rockstar Games shouldn’t be surprised by these features; explicit content has been a mainstay in many of their ongoing series, often por-trayed in a satirical manner that is as rude as it is intelligent.

It’s these cultural nuances, ones that an adult audience will pick up on, that can soar over the heads of the younger demo-graphic of gamers.

Unlike mature gamers, who can form informed opinions on the game’s subject matter, the younger demographic will likely take the graphic content at face value. A pre-teen brain just can-not compute the cynical mes-sages being presented to them underneath the flurry of violence and profanity. All that’s left is the message that cruelty is funny, and an acceptable form of humour.

Even if your sibling or child understands the difference be-tween reality and video games, they will still relay the lessons they have learned from pop-media among friends — and behind adults’ backs. Kids don’t have the ability to read between the lines of the game’s satire, and its humour will be lost on younger players.

Given its popularity, I find my-self wondering how many parents

have purchased their little ele-mentary school prodigies GTA V. Maybe they’ve done so because a friend has it, or because they

believe their kids know the dif-ference between right and wrong. But parents might think twice if the Entertainment Software Rat-ing Board (ESRB) helped inform them on a deeper level.

Games are typically given rat-ings by at least three trained “rat-ers.” These are adults with prior experience with children, such as teachers or parents. Testing games is part of their job, but full playthroughs are not required;

heck, even playing the title at hand isn’t required.

While assessing games, the professionals analyze the most extreme content the game has to offer, taking into consideration themes such as violence, coarse language, sexuality, and drug ref-erence or use.

Beyond these things, the rat-ers will also look at the game as a whole, taking into account the frequency of the more explicit content. Given the nature of video games, they will also review the interactivity, rewards systems, and the degree of control that the player is given.

Unfortunately, today’s rating system isn’t properly address-ing the spectrum of content that is present in the modern game space. The ESRB has six official ratings for released games: Early Childhood, Everyone, Everyone 10+, Teen, Mature, and Adults

Only. Anything that displays vio-lence with blood exists in the Teen to Adults Only range.

With all the content being an-alyzed, it’s amazing that the more extreme themes are usually found in one of two categories: Teen and Mature. The most extreme rating a title can acquire is the AO rat-

ing. At the moment, a game with this rating is denied sale at large retailers, such as Walmart or Fu-ture Shop.

This results in most violent games being lumped into the M rating. The spectrum of con-tent represented in the M rating

is huge, from the light-hearted sword fighting of Fable to the crushing-skulls-in-with-scissor-adorned-sticks combat of The Last of Us. But it’s not just the vio-lence and language that needs to be taken into consideration, it’s the themes that drive these titles.

The latter is an incred-ibly adult experience, as it tackles themes of humanity, parenting, rape, and constantly questions what actions are justifiable when it comes down to survival. It’s in-conceivable that a title such as this is lumped into the same cat-egory as Fable, a game about sav-ing a fairytale land from an evil wizard.

Sure, Fable has its share of vio-lence. But its content and themes can be easily comprehended by adolescents, as they are presented in a stylized and cartoonish fash-ion. How can two extremes coex-ist within one rating?

It’s because of examples like these that ESRB needs to rethink the AO rating — not only as a way of communicating to par-ents the graphic content being represented, but also the more complex themes at hand. If it were easier for parents to distin-guish between games with vio-lence and games for adults, they might think twice about buy-ing little Johnny the latest FPS bloodbath.

The AO rating shouldn’t be reserved for explicit sexual con-tent, and should include games that are truly made for an adult audience that is hungry for ad-vanced themes in this entertain-ment medium.

AO needs to truly embody its title, and redefine what it means to be an Adult Only game. Lift the ban on these AO titles, allow them to be sold in larger stores, and let these titles have a rating that truly represents the content inside their boxes.