hester, s., - web viewcritical discourse analysis and ... discourse markers...

1

The International Research Foundation for English Language Education

CONVERSATIONAL ANALYSIS: SELECTED REFERENCES(last updated 22 February 2013)

Antaki, C. & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.

Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 1-14). London: Sage.

Arnold, A., Semple, R. J., Beale, I. & Fletcher-Flynn, C. M. (2000). Eye contact in children’s social interactions: What is normal behaviour? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 25(3), 207-216.

Atkinson J. M, & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.

Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting audience applause. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 370-407). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. ix-xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Auer, P. (1984). Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company.

Auer, P. (1988). A conversation analytic approach to code-switching and transfer. In M. Heller (Ed.), Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 187-213). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Auer, P. (1998). Introduction: Bilingual conversation revisited. In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge.

Auer, P. (2005). Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text, 25, 7-36.

Auer, P. (2000). A conversation-analytic approach to code-switching and transfer. In L. Wei (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 166-187). London: Routledge.

177 Webster St., #220, Monterey, CA 93940 USAWeb: www.tirfonline.org / Email: [email protected]

2


Benson, D., & Hughes, J. (1991). Method: Evidence and inference for ethnomethodology. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 109-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Billig, M., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543-82.

Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D.H. (Eds.) (1991). Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.

Bolden, G. (2003). Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences. Gesture, 3(2), 187–212.

Bolden, G. (2006). Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘‘so’’ and ‘‘oh’’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction.” Journal of Communication, 56, 661-688.

Bonacina, F., & Gafaranga, J. (2011). ‘Medium of instruction’ vs. ‘medium of classroom interaction’: Language choice in a French complementary school classroom in Scotland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(3), 319-334.

Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal 87(4), 534-545.

Brouwer, C., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29-47.

Button, G. (Ed.) (1991). Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure. Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 251-277). Oxford: Polity Press.

Button, G. (1992). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 160-171.

Button, G., & Casey, N. J. (1984). Generating a topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.167-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Button, G., Coulter, J., Lee, J., & Sharrock, R. E. (1995). Computers, minds and conduct. Oxford: Polity Press.


3


Carlgren, I. (2009). Commentary: CA-studies of learning from an educational perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 203-209.

Carroll, D. (2000). Precision timing in novice-to-novice L2 conversations. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1): 67-110.

Carroll, D. (2004). Restarts in novice turn beginnings: Dysfluencies or interactional achievements? In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 201-220). London: Continuum.

Clayman, S. (1991). News interview openings: Aspects of sequential organization. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk: A reader (pp. 48-75). Newbury Park: Sage.

Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.163-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002a). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002b). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749-777.

Clayman, S. E. & Whalen, J. (1988). When the medium becomes the message: The case of the Rather-Bush encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 241-272.

Clift, R. (2006). Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics,10(5), 569-595.

Clift, R. (2007). Getting there first: Non-narrative reported speech in interaction. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp. 120-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Collins, S., Markova, I., & Murphy, J. (1997). Bringing conversations to a close: The management of closings in interactions between AAC users and 'natural' speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11(6), 467-93.

Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: MacMillan.

Coulter, J. (1983). Rethinking cognitive theory. London: MacMillan.

Coulter, J. (1990). Mind in action. Oxford: Polity Press.


4


Coulter, J. (1991). Cognition: Cognition in an ethnomethodological mode. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 176-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulter, J. (1999). Discourse and mind. Human Studies, 163-181.

Coulter, J. (2005). Language without mind. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 79-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1992). Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In A. D. Luzio (Ed.), The contextualization of language (pp. 337-364). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2007). Assessing and accounting. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (81-119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ford, C. (Eds.). (2004). Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T. (2007). Incrementing in conversation. A comparison of methods in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17(4), 513-552.

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 102-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dailey-O’Cain, J., & Liebscher, G. (2009). Teacher and student use of the first language in foreign language classroom interaction: Functions and applications. In M. Turnbull & J. Dailey-O’Cain (Eds.), First language use in second and foreign language learning (pp. 131-144). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.

Drew, P. (1984). Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 129-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69-101.


5


Drew, P. (2005). Is confusion a state of mind? In H. te Molder & P. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 161-183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drew, P., & M. Sorjonen. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 92-118). London: Sage.

Drummond, K., & R. Hopper. (1993). Acknowledgement tokens in series. Communication Reports, 6, 47-53.

Du Bois, J. (1991). Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics, 1, 71-106.

Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

Edwards, D. (2006). Discourse, cognition and social practices: The rich surface of language and social interaction. Discourse Studies, 8, 41-49.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states, and descriptions. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Egbert, M. (1998). Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-year German students: A comparison with natural conversation. In R. Young and A. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 147-169). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Egbert, M. M. (1997). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 1-51.

Enfield, N.J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2012). Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge University Press.


6


Firth, A. (1995). Talking for change: Commodity negotiating by telephone. In A. Firth (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace (pp. 183-222). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237-259.

Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.

Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). S/FL learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a ‘reconceptualized’ SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 800-819.

Ford, C. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ford, C., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatics resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 134-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (1996). Practices in the construction of turns, the TCU revisited. Pragmatics 6(3), 427-454.

Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (Eds.). (2002). The language of turn and sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The "TCU" revisited. Pragmatics 6, 427-454.

Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 14-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (2003). Social interaction and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 119-143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gafaranga, J. (1999). Language choice as a significant aspect of talk organization: The orderliness of language alternation. Text, 19, 201-225.

Gafaranga, J. (2000). Medium repair vs. other-language repair: Telling the medium of a bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(3), 327-350.


7


Gafaranga, J. (2001). Linguistic identities in talk-in-interaction: Order in bilingual conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1901-1925.

Gafaranga, J., & Torras, M. C. (2001). Language versus medium in the study of bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(2), 195-219.

Gafaranga, J., & Torras, M. C. (2002). Interactional otherness: Towards a redefinition of codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(1), 1-22.

Gallagher, T. (1981). Contingent query sequences within adult-child discourse. Journal of Child Language, 8(1), 51-62.

Gallagher, T., & Darnton, B. (1978). Conversational aspects of the speech of language disordered children: Revision behaviours. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21(1), 118-135.

Gardner, H. (1998). Social and cognitive competencies in learning: Which is which? In I. Hutchby & S. Moran Ellis (Eds.), Children and social competence (pp. 115-133 ). London: Falmer Press.

Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.

Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, “trust” as a condition of stable, concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187-238). New York: Ronald Press.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Garfinkel, H. (1974). The origins of the term ‘ethnomethodology.’ In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology. London: Penguin.

Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tyriakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 338-366). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

Gaskill, W. (1980). Correction in native speaker - non-native speaker conversation. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 125-137). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Golato, A. (2000). An innovative German quotative for reporting on embodied actions: Und ich so/und er so “and I’m like/and he’s like.” Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 29-54.

Golato, A. (2002). German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 547-571.


8


Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 90-121.

Golato, A. (2005). Compliments and compliment responses: Grammatical structure and sequential organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Golato, A. (2012). Impersonal quotation and hypothetical discourse. In I. Buchstaller & I. Van Alphen (Eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (3-36). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language; Studies in ethnomethodology (97-121). New York: Irvington Publishers.

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.

Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly,50(2), 115-131.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.

Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260.

Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis: An ethnomethdological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp.157-182). London: Sage.

Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity (pp. 19-42). Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum.


9


Goodwin, C. (2006). Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 97-125). Oxford: Berg.

Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53-73.

Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp.1-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51-75.

Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Directive/response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities. In S. McConnell (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 157-173). New York, NY: Praeger.

Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

Goodwin, M. H. (1990/1991). Retellings, pretellings, and hypothetical stories. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 263-276.

Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. Philips, S. Steele & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200-248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society, 17(3), 401-30.

Greatbatch, D. (1992). The management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 268-301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greatbatch, D., & Dingwall, R. (1998). Talk and identity in divorce mediation. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 121-132). London: Sage.

Gumperz, J., & Herasimchuk, E. (1983). The conversational analysis of social meaning: A study of classroom interaction. In R. W. Shuy (Ed.), Sociolinguistics – current trends and prospects: Proceeding of the Georgetown University Round Table (pp. 99-134). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.


10


Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doelher, S. (Eds.). (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.

Hayashi, M. (2003). Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Hayashi, M. (2003). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 109-141.

Hayashi, M. (2004). Projection and grammar: Notes on the 'action-projecting' use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36(8), 1315-1336.

He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 568-582.

Heap, J. (1997). Conversation analysis methods in researching language and education. In N. Hornberger & D. Corson (Eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 217-225). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Heath, C. (1981). The opening sequence in doctor-patient interaction. In P. Atkinson & C. Heath, (Eds.), Medical work: Realities and routines (pp.71-90). Aldershot, UK: Gower.

Heath, C. (1984). Talk and recipiency; sequential organization in speech and body movement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 247-265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Helasvuo, M. L., Laakso, M., & Sorjonnen, M. L. (2004). Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 1-37.

Hellerman, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 377-404.

Hellerman, J. (2007). The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 83-96.

Hellerman, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.


11


Hellermann, J. (2009). Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 113-132.

Hellerman, J. (2009). Practices for dispreferred responses using no by a learner of English. IRAL, 47, 95-126.

Hellermann, John and Cole, Elizabeth. 2009. “Practices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom: Disengagement from dyadic task interaction.” Applied Linguistics, 30(2): 186-215.

Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 25-45.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, J. (1984). Conversation analysis. In J. Heritage (Ed.), Garfinkel and ethnomethodology (pp. 233-292). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heritage, J. (1988). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger and P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation (pp. 21-47). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Heritage, J. (1995). Conversation analysis: Methodological aspects. In U. M. Quasthoff (Ed.),

Aspects of oral communication (pp. 391-418). New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Heritage, J. (1999). Conversation analysis at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1/2), 69-76.

Heritage, J. (2005). Cognition in discourse. In H. te Molder & P. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 184-202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 93-137). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heritage, J., & Roth, A. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(1), 1-60.


12


Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice between health visitors and first time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 359-417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, J., & T. Stivers. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science and Medicine, 49(11), 1501-1517.

Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Lanham, MD: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.

Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional and approaches to linguistic structure (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hosoda, Y. (2000). Other-repair in Japanese conversations between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 39-63.

Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality. Culture, cognition and interaction (375-398). Oxford: Berg.

Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchins, E., & Palen, L. (1991). Constructing from space, gesture, and speech. In L. Resnick, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 23-40). Berlin: Springer.

Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in in social interaction (pp. 294-338). New York: Free Press.

Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47-96.


13


Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language. Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79-96). New York: Irvington Publishers.

Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.191-221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social interaction (pp. 86-100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Jefferson, G. (1990). List-construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63-92). Washington, D. C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.

Jefferson, G. (1996). A case of transcriptional stereotyping. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 159-70.

Kasper, G. (1997). “A” stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 307-312.

Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 551-567.

Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83-99.

Kasper, G. (2008). Discourse and socially shared cognition. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 6. Knowledge about language (1-19). Cambridge, MA: Springer Science Media.

Kasper, G. (2009). Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view? IRAL, 47, 11-36.

Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117-142). London: Routledge.

Kendon, A. (1985). Some uses of gesture. In D. Tannen & M. Saville-Troike (Eds.), Perspectives on silence (pp. 215-234). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate: A review. Research in Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175-200.


14


Kendon, A. (1990). Some functions of gaze in two-person conversation. In A. Kendon (Ed.), Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters (pp. 51-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309.

Koshik, I. (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which imply reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1851-1877.

Koshik, I. (2003). Wh questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5, 51-77.

Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1083-1110.

Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Philadelphia: PA. John Benjamins.

Laver, J. (1975). Communicative functions of phatic communication. In A. Kendon, R. Harris & M. Ritchie Kay (Eds.), Organisation of behaviour in face-to-face interaction (pp. 215-238). The Hague: Mouton.

Lazaraton, A. (1997). Preference organization in oral proficiency interviews: The case of language ability assessments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 53-72.

Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20, 441-458.

Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19, 111-131.

Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238-276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, G. H. (1996). Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4), 303-21.

Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177-201.

Lerner, G. H. (2004). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 151-184.


15


Lerner, G., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 526–557.

Liddiccoat, A. (1997). The conversational object mm: A weak and variable acknowledging token. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(2), 131-156.

Liddicoat, A. (1997). Interaction, social structure, and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 313-317.

Liebscher, G., & Dailey-O’ Cain, J. (2005). Learner code-switching in the content-based foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 234-247.

Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and “silences”: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9, 185-204.

Local, J., & Wootton, A. J. (1995). Interactional and phonetic aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: A case study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 155-184.

Lynch, M. (2006). Cognitive activities without cognition? Ethnomethdological investigations of selected ‘cognitive’ topics. Discourse Studies, 8, 95-104.

Lynch, M., & Bogen, D. (2005). ‘My memory has been shredded’: A non-cognitivist investigation of mental phenomena. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 226-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mangione-Smith, R., Stivers, T., Elliot, M., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). Online commentary during the physical examination: A communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 313-320.

Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Markee, N. (1995). Teachers’ answers to students’ questions: Problematizing the issue of making meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 63-92.

Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Markee, N. (2003). Qualitative research guidelines (conversation analysis). TESOL Quarterly, 37, 169-172.

Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 583-596.


16


Markee, N. (2004). Classroom talks. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 583-596.

Markee, N. (2005). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 355-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Markee, N. (2005). The organization of off-task talk in second language classrooms. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 197-213). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

Markee, N. (2006). A conversation analytic perspective on the role of quantification and generalizability in second language acquisition. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle & P. Duff (Eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics (pp. 135-164). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404-427.

Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602-615.

Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.

Markee, N., & Seo, M. S. (2009). Learning talk analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 37-63.

Markee, N., & Stansell, J. (2007). Using electronic publishing as a resource for increasing empirical and interpretive accountability in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 24-44.

Martin, C. (2009). Relevance of situational context in studying learning as changing participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 133-149.

Marton, F. (2009). Commentary. Beyond learning as changing participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 211-215.

Maynard, D. (1980). Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica, 30 (3/4), 263-290.

Maynard, D. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.


17


McHoul, A. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349-377.

McHoul, A., & M. Rapley (Eds.). (2001). How to analyse talk in institutional settings. London: Continuum.

McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: Analyzing sign language talk. In P. Ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129-150). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and the University Press of America.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2009). Learning to fly – The progressive development of situation awareness. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 151-166.

Mirenda, P., Donellan, A. M., & Yoder, D. E. (1983). Gaze behaviour: A new look at an old problem. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 397-409.

Moerman, M. (1977). The preference for self-correction in a Tai conversational corpus. Language, 53, 872-882.

Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Mondada, L., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501-518.

Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics 23, 323-347.

Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 536-550.

Mori, J. (2007). Border crossings? Exploring the intersection of second language acquisition, conversation analysis, and foreign language pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 849-862.

Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. IRAL, 47, 65-94.


18


Murphy, K. M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction. Mind, culture and activity, 11, 267-278.

Murphy, K. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 113-145.

Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.

Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). When I come down I’m in the domain state: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oelschlaeger, M., & Damico, J. (1998). Joint productions as a conversational strategy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 12, 459-480.

Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 221-245). London: Continuum.

Pallotti, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). L2 Learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives. O’ahu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii at Manoa: National Foreign Language Resource Center.

Peräkylä, A., & Vehvilainen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society, 14, 727-750.

Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2009). Collaborative game-play as a site for participation and situated learning of a second language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 167-183.

Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In J. N. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York: Academic Press.


19


Pomerantz, A. (1978). Attributions of responsibility: Blamings. Sociology, 12, 115-121.

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality. London: Sage Publications.

Potter, J. (2006). Cognition and conversation. Discourse Studies, 8, 131-140.

Potter, J., te Molder, H. (2005). Talking cognition: Mapping and making the terrain. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 1-54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Preston, D. (1982). ‘Ritin folklower daun ‘rong. Journal of American Folklore, 95, 304-326.

Preston, D. (1985). The Lil’ Abner syndrome: Written representations of speech. American Speech, 60, 328-336.

Psathas, G. (1986). Some sequential structures in direction-giving. Human Studies, 9, 231-246.

Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rae, J. (2001). Organizing participation in interaction: Doing participation framework. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 253-278.

Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.

Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35, 677–705.

Reichert, T., & Liebscher, G. (2012). Positioning the expert: Word searches, expertise, and learning opportunities in peer interaction. Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 599-609.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (1983). Conversational analysis. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 118-154). London: Longman.


20


Richards, K., & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.). (2005). Applying conversation analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2009) A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede, (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roberts, C. (1997). Transcribing talk: Issues of representation. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 167-172.

Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business. Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 97-123.

Roger, D., & Bull, P. (1988). Section 1: Concepts of interpersonal communication. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation (pp. 1-8). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Roth, W. M., & Lawless, D. (2002). When up is down and down is up: Body orientation, proximity, and gestures and resources. Language in Society, 31, 1-28.

Sachs, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31-74). New York: Free Press.

Sachs, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 216-232). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sachs, H. (1984). On questions and ambiguity in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Sacks, H. (1992). The MIR membership categorization device. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey sacks: Lectures on conversation (Vol.1). (pp. 40-48). Oxford: Blackwell.

Sachs, H. (1987). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54-69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.


21


Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.

Sahlström, F. (2009). Conversation analysis as a way of studying learning – An introduction to a special issue of SJER. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 103-111.

Schegloff , E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075-1095.

Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In J. J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 346-380). New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.

Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and syntax, (pp. 261-286). New York: Academic Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1981). Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen, (Ed.), Analyzing text and discourse (pp. 71-93). Washington D.C.:Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures' relation to talk. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action (pp. 266-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111-151.

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207-234). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk in interaction. Linguistics, 25, 201-218.

Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. Bornstein & J.S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction and human development (pp. 139-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.


22


Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. R. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social culture. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44-70). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. R. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially shared cognition (pp. 150-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 191-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345.

Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp.101-134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schegloff, E. A. (1992) To Searle on conversation: A note in return. In J. Searle, H. Parret & J. Verschueren (Ed.), Searle on conversation (pp. 113-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Schegloff, E.A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99-128.

Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 157-177.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward and empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102,161-216.

Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Third turn repair. In G. R Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin & J. Baugh (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov (pp. 31-40). Amsterdam, John Benjamin.

Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp.161-182). London: Sage.


23


Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165-87.

Schegloff, E.A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499-545.

Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society, 9, 413-416.

Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(5), 535-596.

Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29, 1-63.

Schegloff , E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205-243.

Schegloff , E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1-63.

Schegloff, E. A. (2001). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen,& H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 229-249). Oxford : Blackwell.

Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for langage, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 70-96). Oxford: Berg.

Schegloff, E. A. (2006). On possibles. Discourse Studies, 8, 141-157.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289-327.

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.

Schegloff, E. A., Koshik, I., Olsher, D., & Jacoby, S. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. ARAL, 22, 3-31.

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.

Schegloff, E., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S., & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3-31.


24


Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205-243.

Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.

Schegloff, E.A., Koshik, I., Olsher, D., & Jacoby, S. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. American Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3-31.

Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In Resnick, L. R., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). Socially shared cognition (pp. 150-171). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 70-96). Oxford: Berg.

Schegloff, E. A. (2006). On possibles. Discourse Studies, 8, 141-157.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Volume 1). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (in press). Ten operations in self-initiated, same turn repair. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schenkein, J. (1978). Identity negotiations in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 57-78). New York: Academic Press.

Schwartz, J. (1980). The negotiation for meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 138-153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing “No”: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547-583.

Seedhouse, P. (1998). CA and the analysis of foreign language interaction: A reply to Wagner. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 85-102.


25


Seedhouse, P. (1999). The relationship between context and the organization of repair in the L2 classrooom. IRAL, 37, 59-80.

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.

Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38, 165-187.

Seedhouse, P. (2005). ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning, 55(3), 533-570.

Selting, M. (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units an turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6(3), 357-388.

Selting, M. (2005). Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation (pp. 17-44). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Eds.). (2001). Studies in interactional linguistics. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Seo, M. S. & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2219-2239.

Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on language and social interaction, 39(4), 377-409.

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis. An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Sorjonen, M. L. (2001). Responding in conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Stivers, T. (2001). Negotiating who presents the problem: Next speaker selection in pediatric encounters. Journal of Communication, 51, 252-282.

Stivers, T. (2004). “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 260-293.

Streeck, J. (1994). Gesture as communication II: The audience as co-author. Research in Language and Social Interaction, 27, 239-267.

Streek, J. (1995). On projection. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 87-110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


26


Streeck, J. (1996). A little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 189-213.

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction. Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2002). A conversation analytical study of telephone conversation openings between native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1807-1832.

Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2002). Telephone conversation openings in Persian. In K. K. Luke & T. S. Pavlidou (Eds.), Telephone calls (pp. 87-109). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Request sequences: The interaction of grammar and social context. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

te Molder, H., & Potter, J. (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.

Torras, M.C., & Gafaranga, J. (2002). Social identities and language alternation in non-formal institutional bilingual talk: Trilingual service encounters in Barcelona. Language in Society, 31(4), 527-548.

Turk, M. (2007). Self-referential gestures in conversation. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 558–566.

Üstünel, E., & Seedhouse, P. (2005). Why that, in that language, right now? Code-switching and pedagogical focus. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 302-325.

Wagner, J. (1996). Foreign language acquisition through interaction: A critical review of research on conversational adjustments. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 215-235.

Wagner, J. (1998). On doing being a guinea pig – A response to Seedhouse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 103-113.

Watson, D. R. (1992). Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and education: An overview. International Review of Education, 38(3), 257-274.


27


Wei, L. (1998). “The ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions in the analysis of conversational code-switching.” In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: language, interaction and identity (pp. 156-176). London: Routledge.

Wei, L. (2002). “What do you want me to say?” On the conversation analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language in Society, 31, 159-180.

Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387-412.

Whalen, J., & Vinkhuyzen, R. E. (2000). Expert systems in (inter)action: Diagnosing document machines problems over the telephone. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing design (pp. 92-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D. H., & Whalen, M. R. (1988). When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems, 35(4), 335-62.

Whalen, J., Whalen, M.R., & Henderson, K. (2002). Improvisational technology in teleservice work. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 239-258.

Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 172-85.

Wilson, T.P. (1991). Social structure and the sequential organisation of interaction. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure. Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 22-43). Oxford: Polity Press.

Wong, J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native-nonnative speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244-67.

Wong, J. (2000). The token ‘yeah’ in nonnative speaker English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 39-67.

Wong, J. (2000). Repetition in conversation: A look at ‘first and second sayings.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 407-24.

Wong, J. (2002). “Applying” conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 37-60.

Wootton, A. J. (1981). The management of grantings and rejects by parents in request sequences. Semiotica, 37, 59-89.


28


Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 519-535.

Young, R. F., & Nguyen, H.T. (2002). Modes of meaning in high school science. Applied linguistics, 23, 348-372.

Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). Achieving context. Openings in emergency calls. In G. Watson &

R.M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology (pp. 35-51). London: Sage.

Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87-106). London: Sage.


hester, s., - web viewcritical discourse analysis and ... discourse markers...

Documents