heating with pv façade in a passive house...south facade b system of case a plus shower drain-water...

17
Georgios Dermentzis , Fabian Ochs, Aleksandra Ksiezyk, Elisa Venturi, Mara Magni, Hannes Gstrein University of Innsbruck [email protected] Heating with PV Façade in a Passive House

Upload: others

Post on 18-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Georgios Dermentzis, Fabian Ochs,

    Aleksandra Ksiezyk, Elisa Venturi, Mara

    Magni, Hannes Gstrein

    University of Innsbruck

    [email protected]

    Heating with PV Façade in a Passive House

  • Outline

    • Building and concept

    • Method and results

    • Primary energy evaluation

    01.10.2018 2Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

  • Building & Concept

    • MFH in Innsbruck, Austria

    for temporary assisted

    living environment

    • Passive House

    (9 kWh/m2a)

    • 14 flats (~35 m2 each) +

    common areas

    • PV on the south façade

    27.3 kWp

    • Electric radiators for

    space heating

    • Electric boilers for DHW

    • Mechanical ventilation with

    heat recovery

    01.10.2018 3Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

  • Building construction

    01.10.2018Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    4

    IIG – Innsbrucker Immobiliengesellschaft

    Construction through prefabricated

    concrete elements

  • Concept

    01.10.2018Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    5

    Installed decentralized system:

    Direct electric heating & DHW

    Almost no pipes

    Centralized system

    2- or 4-pipe distribution

    system

    E-boilerElectric

    radiators

    Central

    storage

    DHWDHW

    Radiators

    PV

    Batteries

    Grid

    Heat

    pump

  • Motivation

    Investigate a direct electric system in combination with

    PV on the façade

    • keep the investments costs low

    • minimize the installation effort

    • eliminate the distribution losses

    • increase the share of on-site renewable energy

    production using the available space in the façade

    01.10.2018 6Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

  • Method

    Calculation tool: PHPP

    1. Compare the PV algorithm in PHPP vs

    Matlab/Simulink

    2. Perform a parametric study in PHPPInstalled decentralized system vs centralized heat

    pump systems by comparing:

    a. Final energy (here electricity)

    b. Primary energy (PE) using:

    i. annual PE factors

    ii. monthly PE factors

    01.10.2018Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    7

  • Parametric study

    Case System description PV

    A Direct electric system with PV in the South façade27.3 kWp –

    South facade

    BSystem of case A plus shower drain-water heat

    recovery27.3 kWp –

    South facade

    C System of case A plus PV in the East and West façade57.9 kWp –

    South, East & West facade

    DReference centralized air-source heat pump (4-pipe

    distribution system)-

    EReference centralized groundwater-source heat

    pump (4-pipe distribution system)-

    01.10.2018 8Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    CaseABC

    CaseDE

  • Parametric study - PV on the facades

    Area [m2]

    FaçadeFaçade without

    windowsPV

    Coveringpercentage

    South 374 285 211 74%

    East 184 144 104 72%

    West 242 215 133 62%

    01.10.2018 9Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    Triangle

    shape ->

    no PV

  • PV yield - PHPP vs Matlab/Simulink

    0

    3

    6

    9

    12

    15

    0 3 6 9 12 15

    PH

    PP

    -P

    V [

    kW

    h/(

    mP

    V2∙m

    on)]

    MATLAB/Simulink - PV [kWh/(mPV

    2∙mon)]

    South

    East-south

    West-north

    7%

    -7%

    01.10.2018 10Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    Annual values

    Difference PHPP

    Matlab/Simulink

    South

    façade

    South, east

    & west

    façades

    Solar radiation -1% -3%

    BIPV yield 1% -1%

    Good agreement between the tools

  • Monthly electricity balance

    0.0

    1.0

    2.0

    3.0

    4.0

    5.0

    6.0

    7.0

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Ele

    ctr

    icit

    y [

    kW

    h/(

    m2∙m

    on)]

    Time [mon]

    Heating DHW Auxiliary Appliances PV

    Direct electric sys. Ground-water

    heat pump

    South facade

    01.10.2018 11Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    South, East &

    West facade

  • Annual electricity balance

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    A B C D E

    Ele

    ctr

    icity [kW

    h/(

    m2∙a)]

    Heating DHW Auxiliary Appliances PV

    01.10.2018 12Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    Highest

    productionLowest

    consumption

  • Primary energy factors

    01.10.2018 13Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    PE

    facto

    rs

    Time [mon]

    Monthly factors Annual factors

  • Primary energy results

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    140%

    160%

    Annualmethod

    Monthlymethod

    rela

    tive P

    E to

    case A

    (annual m

    eth

    od

    ) [-

    ] PE total A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    01.10.2018 14Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

    • The most beneficial:

    Case C (dir. Electricity

    with PV on the South,

    West and East façade)

    • Monthly instead of

    annual PE factors:– In cases with PV the PE

    increases more than in

    cases with HP

    Because PV have low

    contribution during the

    heating period

  • Conclusions

    Concept of a Passive House building using direct electricity for heating and

    DHW combined with PV on the façade

    • The direct electricity systems combined with PV have similar or better

    (in case of PV on the South, West and East façade, assuming shadings

    losses of 10%) performance to heat pump systems without PV, because

    PV can cover the additional electricity required.

    • Monthly instead of annual PE factors leads different ranking of the

    investigated concepts, since renewables have low contribution in winter,

    when demand is high.

    – E.g.: In case E (ground-water heat pump), in order to have the same PE as

    case A (reference), a PV system of 3.7 kWp is required using annual PE factors

    and 1.5 kWp using monthly PE factors.

    01.10.2018 15Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

  • Outlook

    • In-situ detailed monitoringo Energy performance

    o Comfort conditions

    • Dynamic simulations o Calculate the part of PV electricity that is used directly

    o Investigate grid interaction (load in winter, PV in summer)

    o Investigate electric storage

    01.10.2018 16Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck

  • Thank you

    for your attention

    [email protected]