heating with pv façade in a passive house...south facade b system of case a plus shower drain-water...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Georgios Dermentzis, Fabian Ochs,
Aleksandra Ksiezyk, Elisa Venturi, Mara
Magni, Hannes Gstrein
University of Innsbruck
Heating with PV Façade in a Passive House
-
Outline
• Building and concept
• Method and results
• Primary energy evaluation
01.10.2018 2Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
-
Building & Concept
• MFH in Innsbruck, Austria
for temporary assisted
living environment
• Passive House
(9 kWh/m2a)
• 14 flats (~35 m2 each) +
common areas
• PV on the south façade
27.3 kWp
• Electric radiators for
space heating
• Electric boilers for DHW
• Mechanical ventilation with
heat recovery
01.10.2018 3Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
-
Building construction
01.10.2018Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
4
IIG – Innsbrucker Immobiliengesellschaft
Construction through prefabricated
concrete elements
-
Concept
01.10.2018Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
5
Installed decentralized system:
Direct electric heating & DHW
Almost no pipes
Centralized system
2- or 4-pipe distribution
system
E-boilerElectric
radiators
Central
storage
DHWDHW
Radiators
PV
Batteries
Grid
Heat
pump
-
Motivation
Investigate a direct electric system in combination with
PV on the façade
• keep the investments costs low
• minimize the installation effort
• eliminate the distribution losses
• increase the share of on-site renewable energy
production using the available space in the façade
01.10.2018 6Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
-
Method
Calculation tool: PHPP
1. Compare the PV algorithm in PHPP vs
Matlab/Simulink
2. Perform a parametric study in PHPPInstalled decentralized system vs centralized heat
pump systems by comparing:
a. Final energy (here electricity)
b. Primary energy (PE) using:
i. annual PE factors
ii. monthly PE factors
01.10.2018Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
7
-
Parametric study
Case System description PV
A Direct electric system with PV in the South façade27.3 kWp –
South facade
BSystem of case A plus shower drain-water heat
recovery27.3 kWp –
South facade
C System of case A plus PV in the East and West façade57.9 kWp –
South, East & West facade
DReference centralized air-source heat pump (4-pipe
distribution system)-
EReference centralized groundwater-source heat
pump (4-pipe distribution system)-
01.10.2018 8Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
CaseABC
CaseDE
-
Parametric study - PV on the facades
Area [m2]
FaçadeFaçade without
windowsPV
Coveringpercentage
South 374 285 211 74%
East 184 144 104 72%
West 242 215 133 62%
01.10.2018 9Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
Triangle
shape ->
no PV
-
PV yield - PHPP vs Matlab/Simulink
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 3 6 9 12 15
PH
PP
-P
V [
kW
h/(
mP
V2∙m
on)]
MATLAB/Simulink - PV [kWh/(mPV
2∙mon)]
South
East-south
West-north
7%
-7%
01.10.2018 10Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
Annual values
Difference PHPP
Matlab/Simulink
South
façade
South, east
& west
façades
Solar radiation -1% -3%
BIPV yield 1% -1%
Good agreement between the tools
-
Monthly electricity balance
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Ele
ctr
icit
y [
kW
h/(
m2∙m
on)]
Time [mon]
Heating DHW Auxiliary Appliances PV
Direct electric sys. Ground-water
heat pump
South facade
01.10.2018 11Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
South, East &
West facade
-
Annual electricity balance
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
A B C D E
Ele
ctr
icity [kW
h/(
m2∙a)]
Heating DHW Auxiliary Appliances PV
01.10.2018 12Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
Highest
productionLowest
consumption
-
Primary energy factors
01.10.2018 13Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
PE
facto
rs
Time [mon]
Monthly factors Annual factors
-
Primary energy results
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
Annualmethod
Monthlymethod
rela
tive P
E to
case A
(annual m
eth
od
) [-
] PE total A
B
C
D
E
01.10.2018 14Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
• The most beneficial:
Case C (dir. Electricity
with PV on the South,
West and East façade)
• Monthly instead of
annual PE factors:– In cases with PV the PE
increases more than in
cases with HP
Because PV have low
contribution during the
heating period
-
Conclusions
Concept of a Passive House building using direct electricity for heating and
DHW combined with PV on the façade
• The direct electricity systems combined with PV have similar or better
(in case of PV on the South, West and East façade, assuming shadings
losses of 10%) performance to heat pump systems without PV, because
PV can cover the additional electricity required.
• Monthly instead of annual PE factors leads different ranking of the
investigated concepts, since renewables have low contribution in winter,
when demand is high.
– E.g.: In case E (ground-water heat pump), in order to have the same PE as
case A (reference), a PV system of 3.7 kWp is required using annual PE factors
and 1.5 kWp using monthly PE factors.
01.10.2018 15Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
-
Outlook
• In-situ detailed monitoringo Energy performance
o Comfort conditions
• Dynamic simulations o Calculate the part of PV electricity that is used directly
o Investigate grid interaction (load in winter, PV in summer)
o Investigate electric storage
01.10.2018 16Georgios Dermentzis University of Innsbruck
-
Thank you
for your attention