heating and cooling with mini splits in the northeast
TRANSCRIPT
© buildingscience.com
Heating and Cooling with Mini Splitsin the Northeast
Kohta Ueno
September 24, 2014
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast2
© buildingscience.com
Background
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast3
© buildingscience.com
Supporting Zero Energy Ready Homes Transformations, Inc.
currently building net-zero homes in Massachusetts
Mini split heat pumps (MSHPs) part of builder’s strategy: tradeoffs
Single point of heating/ cooling on each floor
Researching how well does this work? How widely can it be applied?
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast4
© buildingscience.com
Full Report Available 140 page brick of a report Reports has details,
presentation is overview Currently in final review If taking notes… relax
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 1 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast5
© buildingscience.com
Transformations, Inc. Construction Triple glazed windows 1 ACH 50 typical Tankless DHW
High density spray foaminsulation
4” concrete slab
2” XPS rigid insulation
10” x 20” concretefooting
Compacted fill
High density spray foaminsulation
10” concrete�foundation wall
Dampproofing below grade
Free-drainingbackfill
Capillary break: damp-proofing, cementitiouscoating, or membrane-applied to top of footing
Filter fabric
Gravel (no fines)
Perforatedperimeter drain
Capillary break applied to�top of foundation wall
6 mil polyethylene
8” min.
(2) 2x6 P.T. sill
2x10 rim joist
2x4 P.T. studs @ 24” o.c.(optional)
2x4 studs @ 16” o.c.
Intumescent paint
1/2" gypsum board (optional)
ZIP System® roof sheathing
18" cellulose�insulation
Asphalt shingles
Fully-adhered membrane
Siding
1/2" gypsum board
ZIP System® wall sheathing
1/2” gypsum board
12” low density spray foamcavity insulation (R-47)
2x4 studs @ 16” o.c.
Low density spray foam atrim joist
Baffle
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast6
© buildingscience.com
Mini-Split Heat Pumps (MSHPs) Installations in Asia/Europe for 40+ years More expensive per ton BUT if ductless… Mitsubishi equipment: full heat capacity @ -5ºF Rated to -13ºF, still operating at -20ºF (H2i/HyperHeat)
Modulates to meet load Best performance @ part load (worst @ full load)
COPs in 2.5-3 range in cold winter conditions
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Coefficient of P
erform
ance [‐]
Outdoor Temperature (F)
Maximum Capacity
Rated Capacity
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast7
© buildingscience.com
Builder’s MSHP Experience Low load houses: 10-18 kBtu/hour heating All production has MSHPs as single heat source
(one per floor, ~1800 sf houses typical) Savings from mechanicals into enclosure ~$15,000 enclosure upgrade cost (∆$) ~$5000 savings on simplified mechanicals (∆$)
Trouble-free operation—few equipment callbacks
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast8
© buildingscience.com
Monitoring Overview
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 2 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast9
© buildingscience.com
Monitoring Timeline
Eight houses, two sites Mixed monitoring package—various sensors
(T/RH, doors, power) at different houses
0
500
1000
1500
HDD Ba
se 65 F
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast10
© buildingscience.com
Monitoring Package
Interior temperature/RH MSHP Electrical Use
Door Open/Closed StatusDoor Open/Closed Status
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast11
© buildingscience.com
Monitoring Package: 8 Houses, 2 Sites
Temperature/RH Sensor Door Closure Sensor
N
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast12
© buildingscience.com
Equipment Capacity
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 3 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast13
© buildingscience.com
Did MSHPs Meet Setpoint? (Capacity) Heat pumps as a single source of heating in
Massachusetts (Zone 5A) (design T +2, -2ºF) NREL testing (2011)—matches equipment specs Monitored data: no sign of low equipment
capacity (i.e., long runtimes/high wattage and declining indoor temperature)—excess available
Included winter 2013-2014 (“Polar vortex”): 6730 HDD 65ºF vs. 6220 HDD 65ºF normal
When temperature was down, unit wasn’t running (or other issues)
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast14
© buildingscience.com
Hourly Power Use vs. Temperature
Spare Capacity @ Design
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast15
© buildingscience.com
Equipment Sizing Oversizing provides heating capacity at low Ts Oversizing not as big of a problem with MSHPs—
modulating.
Location Lot A.G.
Square Feet
Heating Design Load kBtu/hr
Installed Equipment Capacity kBtu/hr
Oversizing Factor
Devens 3 1728 16.8 25.0 149% Devens 4 1728 16.3 25.0 153% Devens 7 1952 18.2 37.5† 206% Devens 8 1524 13.0 25.0 192%
Easthampton 13 1728 12.1 22.0 182% Easthampton 17 1239 11.0 11.0 [22.0]‡ 100% [200%] Easthampton 23 1132 10.0 11.0 [22.0]‡ 110% [220%] Easthampton 30 2266 18.1 22.0 [33.7]* 121% [186%]
Original installed capacity [Retrofitted Equipment Capacity]
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast16
© buildingscience.com
Operating Patterns
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 4 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast17
© buildingscience.com
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11/2/12 11/22/12 12/12/12 1/1/13 1/21/13 2/10/13 3/2/13 3/22/13 4/11/13 5/1/13
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) TNorth BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
Temperature & Power Use Plot
Varying wattage draw-modulation First vs. second floor; comparison to max 2000 W
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast18
© buildingscience.com
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11/2/12 11/22/12 12/12/12 1/1/13 1/21/13 2/10/13 3/2/13 3/22/13 4/11/13 5/1/13
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) TNorth BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
Temperature & Power Use Plot
Varying wattage draw-modulation First vs. second floor; comparison to max 2000 W
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11/2/12 11/22/12 12/12/12 1/1/13 1/21/13 2/10/13 3/2/13 3/22/13 4/11/13 5/1/13
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) TNorth BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast19
© buildingscience.com
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11/2/12 11/22/12 12/12/12 1/1/13 1/21/13 2/10/13 3/2/13 3/22/13 4/11/13 5/1/13
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) TNorth BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
Temperature & Power Use Plot
Varying wattage draw-modulation First vs. second floor; comparison to max 2000 W
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11/2/12 11/22/12 12/12/12 1/1/13 1/21/13 2/10/13 3/2/13 3/22/13 4/11/13 5/1/13
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) TNorth BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11/2/12 11/22/12 12/12/12 1/1/13 1/21/13 2/10/13 3/2/13 3/22/13 4/11/13 5/1/13
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) TNorth BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast20
© buildingscience.com
Temperature & Power Use Plot-Cooling
Second floor doing most of cooling Started running first floor unit—more even Ts?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5/1/13 5/21/13 6/10/13 6/30/13 7/20/13 8/9/13 8/29/13
Hou
rly Electrical Use (W
h)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T Front BR T Mid BR T Master BR T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 5 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast21
© buildingscience.com
Monthly Energy Use
First winter—basement uninsulated First floor vs. second floor unit
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
2011 2012 2013 2014
kWh/mon
th
Sum of 2nd Floor kWh
Sum of 1st Floor kWh
Values
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast22
© buildingscience.com
Simplified (2-Point) Space Conditioning
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast23
© buildingscience.com
Simplified Space Conditioning Takes advantage of low heat loss enclosure
(“superinsulated buildings”) Heat “filters through” interior (partitions, floors,
open doorways, interior gains) as fast as is lost through exterior shell
Previous work: best with smaller houses, bedroom doors open often, constant setpoint
Being “completely safe”—with a fully ducted system—you still see temperature variations between spaces (but it is “standard practice”!)
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast24
© buildingscience.com
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0‐1 1‐2 2‐3 3‐4 4‐5 5‐6 6‐7 7‐8 8‐9 9‐10 10+
Cumulative %
Freq
uency (# Hou
rs)
Maximum ΔT Between Rooms
Frequency Cumulative %
ACCA Manual RS (4ºF Difference) Highest - lowest temperature Omitted bonus room and basements
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0‐1 1‐2 2‐3 3‐4 4‐5 5‐6 6‐7 7‐8 8‐9 9‐10 10+
Cumulative %
Freq
uency (# Hou
rs)
Maximum ΔT Between Rooms
Frequency
Cumulative %
96% of hours below 4ºF requirement
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 6 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast25
© buildingscience.com
Simplified Space ConditioningLocation Lot Square Feet % Under 4°F Sub-Case Devens 3 67%
73% 19% 91% 96%
Full data set; bonus room omitted Winter 2012-2013, MSHP on Winter 2013-2014, MSHP on
Summer 2013 Summer 2012
Easthampton 13 1795 96% Full data setEasthampton 17 1348 86%
95% Full data set
After 2nd MSHP retrofittedEasthampton 23† 1620 75%
82% Full data set
After 2nd MSHP retrofittedEasthampton 30 2151 - Not analyzed (1 head per bedroom) Many houses 70%+ under 4ºF, complaints rare Devens 4, 7, 8 not analyzed—missing data Summer performance better than winter—BUT
low SHGC, glazing ratios
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast26
© buildingscience.com
Two Stories, One MSHP
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast27
© buildingscience.com
One Mini Split, Two Floors? Design Heating & Cooling Loads: 11 kBtu/hr heating (left); 10 kBtu/hr heating (right) 12.5 kBtu/hr mini split heating capacity at 5 F
Second floor unit rarely runs (20 F days) Design: single mini-split head on first floor
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast28
© buildingscience.com
One Mini Split, Two Floors?
Comfort problems even with “redistribution fan” (continuous exhaust fan from MSHP to master bedroom, ~40 CFM)
Redistribution fan—edge cases vs. bad cases
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5/6 5/26 6/15 7/5 7/25 8/14 9/3 9/23
Hou
rly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Stairs T Kids BR (Up) T Master BR (Up) T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
2nd floor MSHP added
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 7 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast29
© buildingscience.com
Retrofitted MSHPs on 2nd Floor
Thermal buoyancy matters for distribution, even in very airtight houses (~1.0 ACH 50)!
1 MSHP & 2 floors = choose heating or cooling Or a really big redistribution system!
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast30
© buildingscience.com
Bonus Room Geometry
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast31
© buildingscience.com
Comfort Complaint Many superinsulated/airtight houses running
successfully with two mini split heads Comfort complaint in Central MA house Custom house plan (first floor bump out, bonus rm)
View from Southeast View from Northeast
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast32
© buildingscience.com
Comfort Complaint Downstairs Ts even Constant setpoint Front BR warmest Rear BR colder Bonus room ~50 F
(homeowner) Worse w. garage open BR doors open/closed ~300 CFM 50 (0.8 ACH 50) Not capacity problem: 2nd floor = 6200 Btu/hour load
View from East (front)
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 8 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast33
© buildingscience.com
Comfort Complaint
Mini split head
2.3:1 exterior: interior
4:1 exterior: interior2:1 exterior: interior
Mini split head
Can calculate room relative heat loss/gain at various outdoor temperatures (SWA work)
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast34
© buildingscience.com
Temperature & Door Status Monitoring
But open door data—many hours within 4F of hallway—but warmer exterior temperatures
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2/14 2/19 2/24 3/1 3/6 3/11
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Front BR T Second Hall T Rear Bedroom (MBR) T
Bonus Room T Front BR Door Rear BR (MBR) Door Bonus Room Door
Bonus RoomRear bedroom
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast35
© buildingscience.com
Mini split “blowing into open door?”
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast36
© buildingscience.com
Bonus Room Not Always Problem Comfort complaint → bonus room ≠
Bonus room → comfort complaint!
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
12/1/13 12/6/13 12/11/13 12/16/13 12/21/13 12/26/13 12/31/13 1/5/14 1/10/14 1/15/14
Hou
rly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) T
North BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 9 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast37
© buildingscience.com
Bonus Room Not Always Problem Comfort complaint → bonus room ≠
Bonus room → comfort complaint!
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
12/1/13 12/6/13 12/11/13 12/16/13 12/21/13 12/26/13 12/31/13 1/5/14 1/10/14 1/15/14
Hou
rly Electric
al Use (W
h/ho
ur)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T First Floor T Second Hall T South Rear BR T Master BR (Front) T
North BR T Bonus Rm T 1st Floor Wh 2nd Floor Wh
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast38
© buildingscience.com
On-Off Temperature Control/Setbacks
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast39
© buildingscience.com
Constant-Setpoint Operation
MSHP works at best efficiency—no big “slug of heat” required (max ~1000 W)
Single point works best @ constant—heat “filters out” from the core to exterior rooms
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2/1 2/3 2/5 2/7 2/9 2/11 2/13 2/15
Hourly Electric
al Use (W
h)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T
First Floor T
Second Hall T
Front BR T
Mid BR T
Master BR T
1st Floor Wh
2nd Floor Wh
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast40
© buildingscience.com
On-Off Setpoint Operation
Temperature swings between 60 and 70 F System turned off, “coasting” down, then max
capacity Many hours near maximum capacity (2000 W)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2/1 2/3 2/5 2/7 2/9 2/11 2/13 2/15
Mini Split Electrical Use (k
Wh)
Tempe
rature (F)
Exterior T
First Floor‐Liv Rm T
First Floor‐Closet T
Master Bedrm T
First Flr BR T
Mini Split 1st
Mini Split 2nd
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 10 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast41
© buildingscience.com
On-Off vs. Constant Setpoint Energy Use
Hourly kWh vs. outdoor temperature Constant setpoint—max ~1500 W for hour On-off—many hours 2000 W+ Little relationship with outdoor T
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
‐20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Hou
rly kWh Sum (A
vg kW)
Outdoor T (F)
1st Floor kWh
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
‐20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Hou
rly kWh Sum (A
vg kW)
Outdoor T (F)
1st Floor kWhConstant Setpoint On-Off Setpoint
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast42
© buildingscience.com
On-Off vs. Constant Setpoint Energy Use Setbacks and on/off usually “done to save energy” Superinsulation + airtightness → less benefit from
setback (less energy lost during “off” cycle) MSHP → recovery from setback (max capacity) is
lowest efficiency operation, at worst time of day Winter 2012-2013 heating use: 1200 sf constant setpoint = 1385 kWh 1100 sf on-off operation = 2561 kWh On off operation—worst outlier vs. REM/Rate
prediction (157% of prediction)
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast43
© buildingscience.com
Single Floor Distribution Issues
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast44
© buildingscience.com
Single Floor Distribution
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 11 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast45
© buildingscience.com
Single Floor Distribution
Think about the path that thermally buoyant or denser/cooled air will take!
In general, open floor plans had few problems—point air leak issue instead
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast46
© buildingscience.com
Other Items
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast47
© buildingscience.com
MSHP Heads per Square Foot Square footage sizing methods are suspect But square footage per head—provided for
reference Not intended as “general guidance”
Model AG Square Feet # MSHPs sf/MSHP Victorian 1728 2 864
Farmhouse 1728 2 864 Custom Saltbox 1952 3 651
Ranch 1524 2 762 Farmhouse 1728 2 864
Small Saltbox 1239 1 [2] 1239 [620] Cottage 1132 1 [2] 1132 [566]
Custom Home 2266 2 [4] 1133 [567] Original installed capacity [Retrofitted Equipment Capacity]
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast48
© buildingscience.com
Snow Blockage Heat pumps: risks of snow blockage of outdoor
unit cutting heating capacity in winter No evidence of issues at two Zone 5A sites Riser blocks or wall brackets recommended
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 12 of 13
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast49
© buildingscience.com
Summer Dehumidification MSHPs modulate → size matched to house load,
less oversizing causing humidity problems # hours over 60% RH inside measured Summer hours over 60% RH 10-20%; 15-25%; 2-10% for various houses
MSHPs not a panacea for controlling RH BUT: Data not compared with 1 or 2 speed ducted systems No complaints No sign if used MSHP “dry mode” Northeast window opening/night cooling operation
(would increase interior moisture levels)
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast50
© buildingscience.com
Future Work With Transformations At Easthampton, change to 3:1 indoor: outdoor
MSHPs on 2nd floor More costly equipment (+50%), less efficient Loss of Massachusetts energy incentive ~$5750/house
Small ducted air handler in second floor hallway
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast51
© buildingscience.com
Conclusions MSHPs as single heating source in Zone 5A Two-point heating works great in many cases, but
problems cases included: Problem geometries (exterior conditions on 5 sides) Single point in two-story houses Extended bedroom door closures Setbacks and on/off cycling (worse energy use too!)
~1100+ sf/head were the problem cases Oversizing MSHPs for heating okay strategy Use of small air handler on second floor—door
closures no longer a concern
2014 EEBA Mini Splits in Northeast52
© buildingscience.com
Questions?Kohta Uenokohta [at] buildingscience [dot] com
EEBA Excellence in Buildings Conference Heating and Cooling with Mini Splits in the Northeast September 24, 2014
Ueno © buildingscience.com 13 of 13