health policy primer

30
Health policy primer: What’s wrong with American healthcare? JDG

Upload: jeff214

Post on 16-Apr-2017

2.525 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Health policy primer

Health policy primer: What’s wrong with American healthcare?

JDG

Page 2: Health policy primer

“How can it be that ‘the best medical care in the world’ costs twice as much as the best medical care in the world?”

– Professor Uwe Reinhardt

The American taxpayer is financing these large differences in costs, but we have little evidence of what benefit we receive in exchange.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/93xx/doc9317/05-29-nasi_speech.pdf

Page 3: Health policy primer

Looking forward, Medicare spending is projected to grow by at least 5.5% per year for at least the next 10 years, while GDP is at best going to grow about 2.5% on average.  Since goverment revenue roughly tracks GDP, this 3 percent gap between Medicare vs. GDP growth is what drives our chronic, structural deficit that's bankrupting the US.

Medicare/Medicaid spending as percent of GDP

Per

cent

GD

P

YearSource: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/7/1600.abstract

Page 4: Health policy primer

Notice the two lines in the graph: “Effect of Aging Alone" and "Effect of Excess Cost Growth." 

The latter, excess cost growth, is actually the major driver of excess, wasteful spending -- what we call "medical cost inflation."  That cost inflation is fueled by taxpayer-funded OVER-spending by Medicare on exorbitantly priced medical technology that often does not improve health.  Medicare is formally not allowed to consider cost when determining whether to pay for a new treatment, device, or technology (nor does Medicare negotiate on price). As a result, hospitals compete by adopting the most expensive new technology available - in spite of the lack of proven comparative health benefits.

Source: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/93xx/doc9317/05-29-nasi_speech.pdf

Page 5: Health policy primer

What is a healthcare system supposed to do?When looking at any model of insurance, public or private, you want to look at how the model promotes thrift on both price and utilization rates, since Total Spending = Price of all services (P) x Quantity of all services provided (Q).

A series of studies have shown that in general, higher spending shows little association with improved health outcomes:

Page 6: Health policy primer

Why do we want to restrain utilization?

A series of studies have shown that in general, higher spending shows little association with improved health outcomes:

“For all of the quality indicators studied, the association with spending is either nil or negative. The absence of positive correlations suggests that some institutions achieve exemplary performance on quality measures in settings that feature lower intensity of care.”

http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/28/4/w566.abstract

Page 7: Health policy primer

More evidence….“Quality of care in higher-spending regions was no better on most measures and was worse for several preventive care measures…. Neither quality of care nor access to care appear to be better for Medicare enrollees in higher spending regions.”

http://www.annals.org/content/138/4/273.abstract

Page 8: Health policy primer

And a famous experiment on different health plans showed that there is an optimum level of utilization that can be achieved with the right level of cost sharing: not overly generous but not

dissuading needed care:

“In general, the reduction in services induced by cost sharing had no adverse effect on participants’ health.”

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9174/index1.html

Page 9: Health policy primer

With that in mind, Americans do not differ much from other OECD countries in our utilization rates, yet we spend nearly twice the OECD median on healthcare:

Source: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/16/49084355.pdf

Page 10: Health policy primer

Which has led to the conclusion that the US pays disproportionately high prices for a similar amount of healthcare being provided:

Source: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/22/3/89.full.pdf

Page 11: Health policy primer

Here's a more direct illustration of the prices we pay:

Source: http://www.ifhp.com/documents/2011iFHPPriceReportGraphs_version3.pdf

Page 12: Health policy primer

Source: http://www.ifhp.com/documents/2011iFHPPriceReportGraphs_version3.pdf

Page 13: Health policy primer
Page 14: Health policy primer
Page 15: Health policy primer
Page 16: Health policy primer

All of this points to the need to be more aggressive not only in negotiating prices, but in understanding the value of the services we're paying for. There is room for market-

based principles here:

Source: http://www.economist.com/node/21546059

Page 17: Health policy primer

Consumer-driven (high-deductible) health plans have been shown to save 14 percent on cost, in comparison with traditional health plans:

Source: http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2011/2011-3-vol17-n3/AJMC_11mar_Buntin_222to230

Page 18: Health policy primer

At the same time, the delivery of healthcare is incredibly arcane to most consumers, and shopping around on prices is a nightmare – and prices can vary by magnitudes of 100!

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/23/the-confusion-of-hospital-pricing/

Page 19: Health policy primer

More transparency on pricing will go a long way towards empowering consumers to seek the most value for their healthcare dollars.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-adv-medical-prices-20120415,0,1276328,full.story

Page 20: Health policy primer

But in many other healthcare systems, the government is much more involved in setting reimbursement rates that reflect the value of the care being provided.

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/high-health-care-costs-its-all-in-the-pricing/2012/02/28/gIQAtbhimR_story.html

Page 21: Health policy primer

So, there is a major role for comparative-effectiveness research to

help shed light on what procedures and new medical innovations

truly deliver 'high-value, cost-conscious' care – and which ones are

simply overkill - i.e. more emphasis on primary & preventive care

would deliver better health than expensive, unnecessary

procedures, and often redundant, poorly coordinated care.

For more on this, see “Box 1,” pg 11-12: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/11-13-lt-health.pdf

Page 22: Health policy primer

But – How does Medicare’s payment policy compare to other country healthcare systems?

Medicare adopts new treatments under a process called a 'National Coverage Determination,' wherein CMS is not formally allowed to consider cost.

Medicare recently adopted a therapeutic vaccine for late-stage prostate cancer that costs $93,000 per patient -- this, despite the fact it's proven to only extend life by about 4 months.

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/medicare-moves-to-pay-for-prostate-cancer-drug-provenge/2011/03/30/AFXzam4B_story.html

Page 23: Health policy primer

And private insurers typically follow Medicare’s lead in determining what to cover.

Page 24: Health policy primer

As a result, hospitals compete with each other by adopting the newest and most expensive technology available in efforts to win higher reimbursement rates and

attract better physicians.

“Hospital costs are soaring across the Washington area as the cost of buying the newest technologies jumps and more uninsured patients take their toll.”

Page 25: Health policy primer

Driving the ballooning costs are ever-growing – and costly – medical technologies

Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/maryland-news/2012/05/hospital-rates-jump-across-washington-region/592766

Page 26: Health policy primer

Singapore, one of the world’s top-rated healthcare systems, faced this same problem and was able to achieve cost control by limiting the rate at which new, unproven

technology could be introduced into public hospitals.

Source: http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2008/07/health-care-in.html

Page 27: Health policy primer

There is a confluence of movements within the U.S. medical community going on to “Choose Wisely” and lead in this direction of "high value, cost conscious care":

… but ultimately, more must be done at the policy level to promote reform in the way we pay for healthcare – and how much we pay.

http://www.abimfoundation.org/Initiatives/Choosing-Wisely.aspx

http://www.annals.org/content/156/2/147.full.pdf+html

Page 28: Health policy primer

To summarize…3 major steps will go a long way to reducing healthcare spending

in the US:• Moving consumers into a paradigm of high-deductible, consumer-driven health

plans with attached health savings accounts*• Requiring greater transparency and consistency in pricing among hospitals and

other providers (while enforcing consistent quality of care standards)*• Incorporating comparative-effectiveness research (CER) into Medicare payment

policy, thereby pushing producers of technology and pharmaceuticals to bring products into the market that demonstrate value in comparison to the current standard of care or generic alternative.

This isn’t a comprehensive list of how to reform Medicare, but it could be a strong start towards a more efficient healthcare system.

*Note: The Affordable Care Act contains provisions that seek to achieve both of these objectives. ACA also introduces comparative effectiveness research but it is questionable whether CER will play a central role in reforming Medicare reimbursement. (For more, see p. 8-9: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8061.pdf)

Page 29: Health policy primer

The over-arching goal is to FLATTEN the cost curve that drives medical cost inflation

The ability of the U.S. to maintain a sustainable level of spending and remain solvent as a nation depends almost exclusively on this problem being solved.

Page 30: Health policy primer

Pessimists vs. Optimists• Glass half empty: The U.S. healthcare system is grossly inefficient

and is ill-equipped to deliver the same standard of quality care to the increasing burden of retirees while spending twice the OECD median per capita on care. Healthcare spending is projected to continue driving up national debt indefinitely.

• Glass half full: The country can afford to spend drastically less on healthcare and still deliver excellent quality care to its citizens, while stabilizing the cost curve and finally setting the US on a path to shrink the national debt. Smart policymakers have an opportunity to seize and can work together to make this a reality.