hatchling orientation during dispersalhatchling ... · hatchling orientation during...
TRANSCRIPT
Hatchling Orientation During DispersalHatchling Orientation During Dispersalfrom Nests
Experimental analyses of an early life stagecomparing orientation and dispersal patterns of hatchlings that emerge from nests close to and far from wetlands
Weaver Dunes, Minnesota
Blanding’s Turtles (Threatened) Nests far from marshBlanding s Turtles (Threatened) – Nests far from marsh(mean = 622 m, 70 -1380 m, n = 138)
Snapping Turtles (Special Concern) – Nests close to marsh( )(mean = 75 m, 5 – 270 m, n = 87)
Painted Turtles (Harvested) – (mean = 65 m, 2 – 190 m, n = 113)
Life Histories• Age specific schedules of reproduction and death• Longevity and long reproductive lifespan
D l d l i• Delayed sexual maturity• Low annual fecundity• High and unpredictable nest mortality ratesg p y• in most cases.• For some species:
Indeterminate growth (older = larger)– Indeterminate growth (older = larger)• High average annual survival of juveniles from
– age 1 to first reproductiong p“Evolutionary life history patterns are just as much a part of what
organism is as are its anatomy, physiology, and morphology.” George Williams
Why hatchling orientation is important in the t t f lif hi t icontext of life-histories
Stable populations of long lived organisms with lowStable populations of long-lived organisms with low fecundity and delayed sexual maturity (i.e. turtles), require high average annual survivorships ) q g g pof juveniles.
Average juvenile survivorships of Blanding’s and S i t tl b th > 0 72 (C d t lSnapping turtles were both > 0.72 (Congdon et al. 1993, 1994).
Factors that handicap hatchlings during dispersalFactors that handicap hatchlings during dispersal from nests (and cause increased mortality) will result in requiring higher survivorships at
bsubsequent ages.
After emerging from nests, most hatchling freshwater turtles face a majorhatchling freshwater turtles face a major problem - finding suitable wetlands
The abilities and tactics of water finding by hatchlings co-evolvedfinding by hatchlings co evolved with the nesting tactics of females
Therefore, patterns of co-evolution of nesting tactics and hatchling orientation and dispersal
h ld b id ishould be evident among species and and families of turtles.
Relative constraints on terrestrial movementsRelative constraints on terrestrial movements
EB CS CPEB CS CPAdults Hats Adults Hats Adults Hats
• Predator + + + +• Predator - + - + + +• Desiccation - - + + - -
Potential Mechanisms
Random dispersal (the null hypothesis)
POTENTIAL CUES FOR NON-RANDOM DISPERSALNegative geotaxis (go down hill)PhototaxisChemotaxis (olfaction)H iditHumidityAuditory cuesSocial facilitation (scent trailing)Social facilitation (scent trailing)
DEVELOPED SKILLSPiloting based on landmarks gCompass orientation (e.g., sun compass)True navigation (requires a map and compass)
Weaver Dunes
Dunes600 h Miss
Marshes1200 h
Miss.River
1200 h
Weaver Bottoms
1500 h
Experimental protocols for eggs and hatchlings: ensuring hatchlings are “naïve” g g
- eggs from nests or oxytocin incubated in natural protected area and removed in dark under tarp
- transport to a dark room in light proof containers
- after hatching (n = 2575), individuals marked by cohort # and assigned to a release bucket in the dark (red bulb)
Experimental release protocols (arenas ~ 90 m diameter)- Fall and Spring
NE
S
West Newton Field(90 x 280 m)
Release hatchlings at center of arena in light-proof bucket with 4 release holes facing N, E, S & W (remove in 45 min.)
WalkWalk fence
Record time, location, clutch i.d. of hatchlingsRecord time, location, clutch i.d. of hatchlings found in buckets or at the fence
Experimental protocols (analysis)N = 0
Fence locations at 16 points(+ fractions) converted to degrees E = 4W = 12degrees
Results analyzed and plotted S = 8esu s a a y ed a d p o edwith Oriana™ package for circular statistics 15
12.5107 5
0McCarthy WMA - 2002
Patterns of orientation in a i t f it ti ( t l
20
15
015 1512.5 12.510 107.5 7.5
7.5
7.5
5 5
5
5
2.5 2.52.5
2.590270
Snapping turtles
variety of situations (natural and unnatural) were examined to infer environmental cues
20 2015 1510 10
10
5 5
5
5
90270
1512.510
180
Blanding’s turtlesto infer environmental cues being used by hatchlings
20
15
10
180
g
McCarthy WMABlanding’s and
Ma Blanding s and
Snapping turtles(2001 & 2002)
ars Dunes
2001 S w ale
2002 F la t
hes
NPond(175 m)
SPHBlanding’s turtleMcCarthy 2001 N
Pond (280 m)SPH (220 m)Snapping turtles
(95 m)
LPH (135 m)
McCarthy
LPH (175 m)
1512.510
0
20 20
20
15 15
15
10 10
10
5 5
5
0
90270
20022001 N SPH (220 m)
LPH(135 m)
pp gMcCarthy (2002)N = 82
20
15
10
0
W
WMA(265 m) WATSON WILLIAMS
E15 1512.5 12.5
12 5
10 10
10
10
7.5 7.5
7.5
7.5
5 5
5
5
2.5 2.52.5
2.590270
20
15
10
5
90
180
270
W
WMA(265 M)
E20 2015 15
15
10 10
10
5 5
5
5
90270
( )(340 m)
190 m
WATSON-WILLIAMS F-TESTS: F = 4.615,p = 0.033, df = 1, 224 280 m
S
1512.5
180
(265 M)
S
190 m
20
180
Non-native Pine RowRiparian Tree-line
WNF – Blanding’s, Snapping and Painted Turtles12.5
0
12.5 12.510 10
10
7.5 7.5
7.5
5 5
5
5
2.5 2.5
2.5
2.5
90270
EB
12.510
7.5
5
180
400
40 40
40
30 30
30
20 20
20
10 1010
1090270
CS
403020
180DEG - CP
25
0
25 2520 20
20
15 15
15
10 10
10
10
5 5
5
5
90270
CP
25
20
15
10
180
M2002
Blanding’s turtles (Sun Compass) Hwy 84
Hatchlings
Naive
Mar
2002
Naiveshe
W E8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
0
90270
Experienced sNaive
2001
8
6
4
2
180
Du
Mar
Experienced
8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
0
90270
nes
rsh
S8
6
4
2
180
es
Congdon, Pappas, Brecke. Fig. 4.
Snapping turtle (time of day)- day vs. evening releaseday vs. evening release
AM
PMPM
Random 28 non-random vs. 3 random (EB’s)All hatchling release dispersal patterns (n = 31)
(dispersals are species-specific) Geotaxis no evidence
Horizon Painted and Snapping turtles (light-open)
Horizon Blanding’s turtles(dark -closed)
Olfaction no evidence
Social facilitation (scent trailing) no evidence
Humidity no evidenceHumidity no evidence
Learning (encoding) Blanding’s (others not tested)
After nest dispersal – Recruitment habitatShallow water with minimal depth and current with vegetation structure for protection from predators, abiotic
t (fi t i t i ) d f f dextremes (first overwintering) and source of food
•Acquisition and management of species•Acquisition and management of species specific or common aquatic recruitment h bihabitat
20081938
marshes“reservoir aging”
marshesmarshes
Habitat Alteration (silviculture & agriculture)
Nesting Dunes
Fire Suppression & Soybean Field Nesting Dunes
Conservation and Management Issues
1) Identify altered habitats that may interfere with orientation and navigation of adults and hatchlings
C i i d di l f h t hli iConsequences: impaired dispersal of hatchlings increasesa) distance traveled, b) time on land, c) risks (predators, roads abiotic extremes and not finding aquaticroads, abiotic extremes and not finding aquatic recruitment habitat)
2) Research to determine whether head starting programs that do not allow hatchlings to move to water naturally,
b l l i i i d i i killsubsequently results in impaired navigation skills
Conservation MeasuresIdentify and protect component areas to promote increased y p p psurvivorship of embryos in nests and hatchlings during dispersal: a) major nesting areas b) potential refuges for the dispersing hatchlings c) aquatic recruitment areas
NESTING AREAS :NESTING AREAS : 1. remove invasives, overgrown woody plants and dense
pine standspine stands2. reduce the extent of agricultural fields and feed plots (for
game species) in typical turtle nesting areas and subsidize farmers who increase the years fields lie fallow
3. Use road signs to increase awareness of hatchlings i d d d d li it h hi hcrossing roads and reduce speed limits where high
densities of hatchlings occur
Weaver Dunes, MN (600 ha of duneterraces, juveniles abundant, Pop. > 5,000)
Valentine Refuge, NB.(29 000 ha of sand hills(29,000 ha of sand hills,juveniles abundant, Pop. ~100,000)
E. S. George Reserve, MI (565 h f ld fi ld d d(565 ha of old fields and woods,juveniles rare, Pop. ~ 250)
Hatchling Blanding’s turtles orient toward far dark horizons (Pappas et al. 2009). Hypothesis: Rare occurrence of juveniles and low population sizes in many forested areas (i.e. northeastern populations) are caused by reduced nesting areas and poor hatchling survivorship during dispersal from nests because dark horizons
d i d i l l d h l i f l dare predominant and not consistently related to the location of wetlands.
On the ESGR, nesting areas used by Blanding’s turtles are characteristically located where - 1) wetlands are seldom visible from nesting areaswhere 1) wetlands are seldom visible from nesting areas
2) near and / or dark horizons are abundant and in all directions
“There is no magic to it, - protect our habitats!”- protect our habitats!
Weaver Dunes - 1938
Marshes
Dunes
Weaver Bottoms
Weaver Dunes 2009
MarshesMarshes
DDunes
Weaver Bottoms
Road Mortalitymale bias- male bias
- population declines
- male bias
- population declines
Blanding’s Turtle Nesting Habitat
Pond, Marsh & Potholes,
Nesting Dune
Nesting distances – Weaver Dunes (Minnesota)
Nesting distances – E. S. George Reserve (Michigan)
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5 C h e l y d r a s e r p e n t i n a ( n = 4 7 2 )m e a n = 3 4 . 5 m , C V = 9 1 . 4m i n - m a x = 1 . 0 - 2 3 0 m
e 1 20 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0
0
5
1 0
f s
a m
p l
e
468
1 0C h r y s e m y s p i c t a ( n = 8 0 5 )m e a n = 6 5 . 7 m , C V = 7 1 . 4m i n - m a x = 1 - 2 9 5 m
% o
f
1 01 2
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 002
E m y d o i d e a b l a n d i n g i i ( n = 2 5 4 )1 2 6 8 C V 7 6 1
2468
1 0 m e a n = 1 2 6 . 8 m , C V = 7 6 . 1m i n - m a x = 4 - 4 4 8 m
D i s t a n c e f r o m n e s t t o w e t l a n d ( m )0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0
02
2 5A ( 3 7 7 )
A comparison of body temperatures during dispersal of hatchling Blanding's turtles during experimental releases and from natural nests.
ampl
e1 5
2 0
A re n a (n = 3 7 7 )N a tu ra l (n = 1 4 5 )l
% o
f sa
5
1 0
B o d y te m p e ra tu re (o C )1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0
0
ple 2 5
3 0
3 5A re n aN a tu ra l
% o
f sam
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
H o u r o f d a y8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 0 2 0 0 0
0
5
Nesting behavior of females and hatchlings
nest dispersal patterns co e ol ednest dispersal patterns co-evolvedFemales:- morphology and physiology (body size, mobility, risk of predation, desiccation
rates)
- wetland habitat and availability of nesting areas
Hatchlings:Hatchlings:- morphology and physiology (body size, mobility, risk of predation, desiccation
rates, and ability to stay on land for extended periods (yolk reserves)rates, and ability to stay on land for extended periods (yolk reserves)
- emergence from nests in Fall or Spring
- distance from wetlands
- habitats types between nests and wetlands
- wetland type (marsh, lake, stream, river)
Snapping turtles (2007-08)
CS CORN REL 2. NAÏVE - RANDOM NOT SIG DIFF FROM EACH OTHER
CS CORN REL 2 NAÏVE RANDOM NOT SIG DIFF FROM EACH OTHER
DEG - NN0
DEG - DOT0
CS CORN REL 2. NAÏVE - RANDOM NOT SIG DIFF FROM EACH OTHER
6 6
6
5 5
5
4 4
4
3 3
3
2 2
2
2
1 11
190 10 10
10
8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
4
2 22
290
65432
180
10864
180
DEG N DEG A DEG PDEG - N
8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
0
90270
DEG - A
8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
0
90270
DEG - P8642
0
902708 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
90
180
270 8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
90
180
270 8 8
8
6 6
6
4 4
4
2 2
2
90
180
270
EB CORN BY CATEGORY - BOTH EXP. ARE NON RANDOM, NAÏVE ARE RANDOM --- ALL CATEGORIES ARE DIFF
Impact of Nesting in Agriculture Fields(t rtles ith TSD)(turtles with TSD)
i d l i i ( l- Biased population sex ratios (can lower effective population sizes, lead to eggs being i f il d i i h i linfertile, and over time, increase the potential for population declines)
d i d d i- Increase or decrease in nest depredation- Altered orientation and nest dispersal
i h hli i l d l iimpacts hatchling survival and population recruitment
SoftshellsSnapping
S i S thMaps
Spiny - SmoothBlanding’s
Painted
Ouachita - Common - False