hassan turabi accuses islamic clerics of misunderstanding

8/9/2019 Hassan Turabi Accuses Islamic Clerics of Misunderstanding

1/9

's Turabi accuses Islamic clerics of misunderstanding - Sudan Tribune: Plural news and views on Sudan

www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article15403[3.6.2015. 16:06:58]

HOME | NEWS TUESDAY 2 MAY 2006

Sudan’s Turabi accuses Islamic clerics of

misunderstanding

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Inauguration of Bashir President of Sudan for

invalid

2015-06-03 06:08:50

By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This article comes again

backdrop of the preparations and the lavish expendit

the ruling regime of the National Congress Party (NC

the Inauguration of (...)

South Sudan: the implications of the return of G-1

2015-06-02 08:00:05

By Steve Paterno For over the years, South Suda

politicians have gained notoriety of proverbial 'Pr

Son,' well explained biblically. The recent arrival into

of some of G-10 (...)

GOOGLE POWERED

Sudanese President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, left,

seen in a 1995 photo, with his

former mentor Hassan al-Turabi.

Email Print Save

April 21, 2006 (KHARTOUM) — Sudanese Islamist Hassan al-Turabi accused some Islamic clerics

of misunderstanding Koranic verses on marriages between Muslim women and non-Muslim men,

role of women in prayers and their testimony in court.

Speaking during an interview, he also urged Muslims not to "sit

down lazily" and await for a messiah to address ills in their

communities.

Al-Turabi also has said that the West is "confused" over the

"grave consequences" posed by the current advent of democracy

in Muslim countries and the "resurrection" of Islamic civilization.

He further condemned the Sudanese government for opposing the

deployment of UN troops in Darfur.

The following is the text of Al-Turabi’s interview by Imam

Mohamed Imam, published by London-based newspaper Al-

Sharq al-Awsat daily newspaper on 21 April.

The jurisprudence and political opinions of Dr Hasan al-Turabi,the Sudanese politician and one of the most prominent leaders of

the Sudanese Islamic movements, recently relayed by various

media organs, have aroused wide reactions and great

controversy.

These reactions have not been restricted to those specialized in jurisprudence and shari’ah, but

they extended to the cultural, intellectual, and political circles within and without Sudan, and these

opinions have become the subject of many television dialogues and meetings and press

interviews, and occupied the internet chat rooms.

Al-Sharq al -Awsat took all these queries and others to Dr Al-Turabi, and conducted this interview:

Your fatwas with regard to the marriage of a Muslim woman to a man of the people of the book

(Christians or Jews) have aroused huge controversy. Do you mean the marriage of a woman, who

becomes a Muslim while her husband continues to belong to his religion, or do you mean her

marriage, if she were a Muslim from the beginning, to a man of the people of the book?

Al -Turabi : First of all, this ijtihad — interpretative jurisprudence — should be considered within the

context of the general affairs of women in the address of the Muslim society. This is because the

address of the contemporary Muslim society about women affairs is beneath the rulings of religious

values, and far removed from these values. For instance, Muslims avoid talking about these rulings

with regard to the marriage of their daughters.

Perhaps it goes without saying that this opinion of mine is not new, it is in fact old. This opinion was

not merely an abstract opinion; it was a reply to situations to which the Muslim communities in the

US were exposed. A woman, who wanted to convert to Islam, came to one of the Islamic centres

in the US, and she wanted to know the ruling about staying with her husband who continued to

belong to his religion. They, the officials of the centre, with their excitability and slavery to

traditions, recommended to her that if she were sincere she ought to sue her husband for divorce,

and hence would lose the custody of her children and all the costs of the court proceedings while

she was taking the first step toward Islam.

Article Comments (0)

ON SUDANTRIBUNE

http://www.sudantribune.com/http://www.sudantribune.com/http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique1http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique1http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sudan-Tribune/147157358639460http://www.facebook.com/business/dashboard/http://www.sudantribune.com/-Comment,012-http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55198http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55198http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55185http://www.google.com/search?ie=iso-8859-1&oe=iso-8859-1&q=&x=0&y=0&domains=sudantribune.com&sitesearch=sudantribune.comhttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=15403&nom_fichier=article_15403http://buzz.yahoo.com/submit?submitUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle15403&submitHeadline=Sudan%27s%20Turabi%20accuses%20Islamic%20clerics%20of%20misunderstanding%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&submitSummary=%20April%2021%2C%202006%20(KHARTOUM)%20%E2%80%94%20Sudanese%20Islamist%20Hassan%20al-Turabi%20accused%20some%20Islamic%20clerics%20of%20misunderstanding%20Koranic%20verses%20on%20marriages%20(...)%20http://twitter.com/share?text=Sudan%27s%20Turabi%20accuses%20Islamic%20clerics%20of%20misunderstanding%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle15403http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle15403&t=Sudan%27s%20Turabi%20accuses%20Islamic%20clerics%20of%20misunderstanding%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudanhttp://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle15403&t=Sudan%27s%20Turabi%20accuses%20Islamic%20clerics%20of%20misunderstanding%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudanhttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=15403&nom_fichier=article_15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=15403&nom_fichier=article_15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=15403http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique5http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique13http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique3http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique4http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique12http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique1http://www.sudantribune.com/index.phphttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=backendhttp://www.sudantribune.net/http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=regionshttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=countrieshttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=identifiantshttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=videoshttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=photoshttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=archiveshttp://www.google.com/search?ie=iso-8859-1&oe=iso-8859-1&q=&x=0&y=0&domains=sudantribune.com&sitesearch=sudantribune.comhttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55185http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55198http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55198http://www.sudantribune.com/-Comment,012-http://www.facebook.com/business/dashboard/http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sudan-Tribune/147157358639460http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sudan-Tribune/147157358639460http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique1http://www.sudantribune.com/http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot4http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot6http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot7http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot92http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot96http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot89http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot8http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot98http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot5http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot3http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?mot103


2/9



M

M

Somaliland’s slavery of refugees in their

homeland?

2015-06-01 20:29:42

By Abdirahman Mohamed Dirye From the onset, A

had had always pondered escape route from Y

which was falling apart at the seams. She wished t

to Somaliland, a place she imagined (...)

Latest Press Releases

Two South Sudanese pastors face d eath pena

Khartoum

2015-06-03 06:08:37

African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies Two

Sudanese Pastors face death penalty for vo

opposition to corruption scandal at Khartoum

Church (2 June 2015) Two South Sudanese (...)

President Bashir’s swearing- in ceremony

2015-06-03 06:08:28

EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDA

CLEVELAND ROW, ST.JAMES'S LONDON SW1A

PRESS AND INFORMATION RELEASE (3/

President Bashir’s Swearing- in Ceremony Today 2

2015, President Omar (...)

Launch of new nutritional project to support ha

older persons in South Sudan

2015-05-27 09:01:33

HelpAge International For immediate Re

Nairobi/Juba, Tuesday May 26, 2015: He

International and its partner, the Islamic Relief w

Wednesday, May 27th, 2015launch a three year (...)

In most cases this deterred women from converting to Islam and declaring their conversion.

Naturally, I read much in the history of Islam, when the situation became troubled between the

Muslims and the polytheists, between Muslims and non-Muslim groups they were in touch with,

and during the days of apostasy, in which there was much disturbance. I reached this opinion

when I did not find in any text of Sunnah a single word to prevent the marriage between a Muslim

woman and a man of the people of the book.

I was of the opinion that they ought to allow the woman to convert to Islam, and strengthen her

belief; in many cases these women would call for God, and be active in their call, a matter that

would bring her husband and those with him to Islam, and so on. This would be a great

achievement in her family and in the other families. Naturally, this angered some people; and they

attacked me and accused me of infidelity, and presented the issue as one of honour.

However, if you consider the issue impartially, then the conversion of the wife to Islam will affect

the non-Muslim husband in a positive way, and he will convert to God’s religion. This is what the

Muslims in Western countries need. We ought to leave it up to the Muslim minorities, who live with

people of the book, and who are interested in this issue, to assess the situation, and to marry their

daughters off to people of the book. Perhaps these girls, through matrimonial relations, would

either bring about the people of the book to Islam, or remain committed to Islam. In the West,

freedoms are relatively wider; let them investigate the situation on the ground, and the

phenomenon in general. This is my opinion of this issue.

Should I infer from this opinion that you are talking about allowing a Muslim woman to remain

with her husband, who is of the people of the book, and not about marrying one of them from the

beginning?

Al -Turabi : No, in the past I talked about a Muslim woman remaining with her husband, who is of

the people of the book; but now, I open up the issue for an assessment of the situation as a whole,

and for the assessment of the marriage itself, because there is no verse in the Koran to prevent

such marriage. Therefore, I do not prevent it on the basis of the accumulation of the hearsay towhich we are used. The hearsay to which we are used has always claimed that the unanimity was

that of the mujtahid faqihs — scholar practising interpretative jurisprudence — in one of the eras,

but when we read the Koran we do not find any trace of this, and hence we stop reading.

We are told to obey the guardian always, even if he has usurped the authority from us by force.

This has been the case in all our eras. However, the Koran deters us absolutely from doing this.

We ought to go back to the origins, the Koran and the Sunnah; if the Koran and the Sunnah left the

issue for us to consider, as they did in this case, then we consider the issue, and express our

opinion in general terms, or as news; after that we focus on the issue itself using this opinion and

these general rulings. Then, whatever happens is for the sake of God.

Row over veil

Your talk about the veil aroused wide controversy, as you say that it should cover the bosom,

and not the head. What is the truth about this?

Al -Turabi : These are lies spread by some journalists who did not attend the forum in which Italked about some of the issues of the Muslim woman. There are words they wrote, which I never

said. Some journalists are attracted by the name Al-Turabi, and hence they attribute to me words I

have never said. In that forum I was not even talk about rulings; I was talking about the language

of the Koran, and how it differed completely in people’s terminology.

The Koran talked about the veil in the rooms of the prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him.

There are special rulings for the women of the prophet that do not apply to other women, and there

are special rulings for the prophet himself that do not apply to other men believers. The prophet’s

rooms were very limited, and people used to go to the prophet for comfort, education, and food,

and also non-believers went to the prophet, and they were strangers; the prophet’s women used

to be at home, and hence it was better that they would be veiled, which was only a barrier, so that

if the people asked them for anything they would ask through that veil.

The veil is a general barrier and not a uniform for women. It is a general barrier that could be used

in language, for instance to say that there is a barrier between the people and the Koran, or we

might refer to the people who wrap the Koran in a cloth to wear it as a talisman, while they raise a

barrier between their hearts and minds and the eloquent meanings and morals of the Koran.

In the lecture I said: If we talk about the clothes for women, we should not talk about the veil, the

battle over the veil, and the veiled women, but we should talk about the scarf. I said that to clarify

the linguistic aspects and not the Islamic rulings. Wine is called wine because it ferments the brain

within the head, and a scarf is called a scarf because it covers the top of the head with the hair

[playing on the two Arabic words Khamr, meaning wine, and Khimar, meaning scarf].

The Koran ordered women to cover their pockets with scarves, but the pocket here is not the one

in which we put money, because these pockets could be empty, and if Moses, peace be upon him,

were to put his hand in them, the hands would come out white, not black, which was his and his

family’s natural colour [trying to emphasize the concept that the pockets could be empty].

I meant that the women who are believers ought to cover their bosoms with scarves. I have not

talked about the rulings at all. Therefore, those who attributed this to me either heard it from

someone and did not attend the lecture, or attended and heard but did not understand what I

http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique12http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique3http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55178http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55178http://www.sudantribune.com/-Press-Releases,003-http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55200http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55200http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55199http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55117http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55117http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55117http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55117http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55199http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55200http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55200http://www.sudantribune.com/-Press-Releases,003-http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55178http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55178http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique3http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?rubrique12


3/9



meant by my words.

Within the context of the linguistic science I was also explaining to women the meaning of "Men

are the tutelary guardians of women’s interests and welfare [Koran verse]." Men and women might

think that this means "dominance over women," because standing up for those who are sitting

down is known in the language — in Arabic standing up and being a guardian are of the same root

— however, women are not sitting down out of feebleness, but because they are either giving birth

or bringing up children, and men with their muscles stand up, come and go, and serve; for

instance, the waiter who serves us in a restaurant is standing up for us.

The entire lecture was an explanation of the meanings of the language, and was not at all about

the rulings, but some people hasten to say, "Al-Turabi denounced the veil," or "Al-Turabi says that

the veil is only for the bosoms," as if I wanted to expose everything under the bosom, i.e. from the

belly down everything should be exposed. This is huge stupidity and false attribution to people. Iwish the journalists would telephone me to ascertain such news.

Then, you do not object to covering the head as a part of the veil?

Al-Turabi: To start with, I do not call it veil; I call it scarf, because the Koran called it scarf, and

called the barrier in the room veil. In your house, if you adopt a veil, you can call it veil, and if you

wanted the word barrier or curtain, then you are free to use it. Here, I am talking about the

language. I have talked much about the rulings, and I pointed out the things that some men

sometimes do not like.

For instance, when the Koran verse refers to "preach to the women," the preaching here is not

addressed by men to women, but to all men and women around the woman, i.e. to the society

around the woman: her mother, her sister, her father and her husband. The husband is the one to

abandon his wife’s bed — one of the ways suggested by Koran to discipline women — and the

society ought to have an opinion, as the Koran verse specified. The woman complains to the one

who abandoned her bed, because the abandonment happened in response to a mistake from her.

As for beating up, it is not up to the husband or men to harm whoever commits adultery, but it is upto the society; furthermore it should not be done by stoning, but by whipping.

The next Koran verse addresses the society, i.e. the believers outside the home circle of the

married couple, "If ye fear a breach between them twain, appoint two arbiters, one from his family,

and the other from hers," as the verse continues. The contexts of the Koran verses from which we

infer the rulings ought to be clear, and should not be curtailed, and presented as rulings out of

context. Also the issue of testimony agitated some people.

Women and Islamic law

Also I wanted to examine the issue of the testimonies. It seems that you equate between the

testimony of woman and that of man, which contradicts the text of the holy verse, "Then a man

and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can

remind her?"

Al -Turabi : Honourable brother, do not judge me until I finish my talk. The verse to which you refer

is the same one that guided us to record debts, state the date on which they ought to be paid up,and called on the writer to record, and on the witnesses to testify. God Almighty said, "If one of

them errs," meaning that perhaps one of them errs; He did not say, "One of them definitely will

err;" otherwise we would have favoured that ruling. In another verse of the Holy Koran itself, it is

said if death approaches one of us then we should take "just witnesses among us;" He did not say

"one man and two women" or "just men only," because the time of death is attended by more

women than men. When death approaches wives, daughters, and sisters might be closer than

men. In this situation men and women have the same rulings; they are sworn in, and if they are

found to have sinned, then we ought to call other witnesses.

The general public does not know the procedures of giving evidence, there is giving evidence in

registrations of contracts documents, and there is giving evidence in court before a judge. The

judge listens to the witnesses, and the lawyers, the opponent attorneys cross examine the

witnesses, and the judge talks to them so that they remember the exact details of the incident

about which they give evidence, and so that the judge ascertains that they are worthy of trust,

whether they were discredited before, and whether they have experience of the issue about which

they testify.

Women could be specialized in law, or businesswomen, while a male witness might have no

experience in law or in business; in such a case a judge could favour the experience of a woman in

the case concerned. The female witness could be a gynaecologist, a obstetrician, and in this case,

she would know whether a foetus was stillborn or died after birth, a fact that could have many

consequences. This is what every judge, and every sane person would do.

The prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, used to judge the giving of evidence between

the opponents according to its face value, because he only knew the appearances, and some

people might be better in giving evidence. In this case one side could be dealt with unfairly, but in

doomsday there will be justice. The prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, warned the

witnesses by this lesson.

Could we restrict this ruling to commerce, and in the commercial cases make the testimony of

the man equal the testimony of two women?


4/9



Al -Turabi : The Koran did not say that she will err, but said, "So that if one of them errs;" The

Koran did not rule that a woman would definitely err. However, because women in most cases do

not work in commerce, God Almighty has not burdened them with work, but has commissioned

men to go out, walk on earth, and bring money to support women.

The entire situation ought to be left up to the judge when assessing the testimonies; if a man and a

woman were equal in everything, then the testimony of the one who experienced work in this

specific field would have more weight.

In some fields a man might need another man to support his testimony.

Women imams

Within the context of the issues of women, in the issue of women imams, i.e. a woman leading

men in prayers, and that you allowed it?

Al -Turabi : Who has prohibited this, so that I would allow it? What prohibited it was your tradition

and persecution of women. Your tradition prefers women to pray at home, and even not to attend

the collective prayers, which are led by men. Thus from the start, women do not appear at all, and

if someone says that women are allowed to lead the prayers, men will rise up in anger. In the

traditions of the Sunnah and the prophet’s life we find only one sign in the "Sunan of Abu-Dawud."

The one who interpreted that sign was the same faqih who criticized the opinion of other faqihs in

allowing the three divorces to be reduced to a single one — if a man divorces his wife three times

then he cannot remarry her without her getting married and divorced to a different man —, which is

against the text of the Koran. This was because a senior companion of the prophet allowed that,

but he was wrong because the Koran verse said "divorce can take place twice," but a third time

would lead to rulings. However, Ibn-Taymiyah and his student, Ibn-al-Qayyim, when they found the

Hadith related by Abu-Dawud, saw the truth.

The woman companion of the prophet, when she led the prayers, she did not only lead the people

of her household, but the people of her home. The home is different from the house; it is the circle

surrounding the house, and hence she had a muezzin. If the woman were more knowledgeable

and more pious than us, and she stood to lead us in prayers, then we would not look at her beauty

and be seduced by it; we do not look at the grey hair of the imam and his beard, but we listen to

what he says.

We listen to women in life and we look at them; if the listener were a male judge, and she was

suffering from an injustice, the judge would not look at her appearance, but at her story. If a

preacher’s sermon were meaningless, and he were talking nonsense, then we would look at his

face and his grey hair, we might find him ugly, and we would turn our backs to his sermon

because it is devoid of meaning.

The same applies to government, which they call grand imamate. The Koran, God’s book, did not

call the government grand imamate, because Abraham was made an imam of the people, but he

was not a political ruler of anyone. The Muslims in their terminology called the government

imamate, and bestowed it upon Quraysh — the Mecca tribe to which the prophet belonged to.

The word imamate was used in the Hadith because Quraysh were the imams of the people; they

were imams of infidels, and when they converted they became the imams of Islam having priority

over the others around them, as they were around the Kaaba, and around the famous markets.

The word was used in this context, but the people started to say that having an imam from

Quraysh is one of the conditions of government.

The government in the Koran is the guardianship. The prophet’s Hadith - People who adopt a

woman as a guardian will never succeed - was said within the context of the dispute with the

Persians; the Persians would not have succeeded even if they adopted as a guardian the cousin of

the shah who died, and not the shah’s daughter, because they were Magi, and they would not

have succeeded even had they adopted as guardians a council of males.

At that time, the Persians became a subject of much talk because the shah was succeeded by a

woman. If this Hadith were true, then it would be confined to this context. The Persians did not

succeed when they continued with their Magus traditions, but they succeeded when they became

Muslims, they became imams of our Arabic language, and some people from their country became

imams of Hadith, Koran recitation, and Koran interpretation, may God reward them.

Return of Jesus Christ

Some Hadith explicitly referred to the return of the Christ, peace be upon him, but you reject this

return. What is your evidence on this?

Al -Turabi : The Hadith do not supersede the Koran verses, because the Hadith are attributed

through a succession of individuals, and are not related the same as the Koran. The Koran verses

were written directly from the time they were told by the prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon

him. The prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, did not record anything other than the

Koran; he even prohibited the recording of anything else.

Did the prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, change the Koran on his own accord? God

forbid; the Koran says that the prophet was not allowed to make changes in the Koran, and that he

did not attribute anything falsely to God Almighty. It is clear in the Koran verse that Jesus, peace


5/9



be upon him, brought the glad tidings of a messenger, who would come after him, and whose

name would be Ahmad, but he did not say that he would come during Jesus’ lifetime.

The Koran says that this Prophet Muhammad, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, was the final

one in the series of Jesus and the rest of the prophets, because he is the final messenger. The

Koran verse is explicit that Muhammad is the seal of the prophets who receive God’s revelations,

and not only the final messenger. The Koran verse also shows that Jesus, peace be upon him, on

doomsday will be held to account, because the messengers will be held to account, the same as

those to whom they were sent.

Jesus, peace be upon him will reply that when he died he was not responsible for what they did,

and that he did not say what they attributed to him that they should worship him and his mother

and not God, and he will glorify God, "When thou didst take me up thou wast the watcher over

them, and thou art a witness to all things;" therefore, he is not responsible at all after his death.

The Koran also said that God would make Jesus die, and take him up completely away from this

existence, and purify him, i.e. liberate him completely so that he would not return at all to this

existence. The Koran gave Jesus the glad tidings that those who follow him would vanquish the

Israelites, who abandoned God. The Koran verses one after the other tells this to anyone who has

a heart or who listens. The Koran told us some of the stories of the Christian culture, which was

prevalent among the illiterate Arabs, because the majority of the Christian witnesses of the era of

Jesus disappeared, because they were hunted down, tortured and killed, and hence their fate

remained unknown.

We know from the Koran that Jesus, peace be upon him, was not crucified at all as his enemies

thought; the others thought that he did not die at all, and that God did not end his life. The word

take-up means death if it came within the context of religion or sleep; for instance, within the

context of the angels took him up, or God took him up, this means concluding the life on earth until

one is resurrected on the day of resurrection.

Despite the fact that the Koran verses are very clear, the creed of waiting spread among theMuslims. If the people are persecuted or humiliated, then they will look for any hope, however

faint. This is how I interpret the brother Shiites waiting for the imam. God has not made human

beings immortal. I think - God knows best - that the Abbasid Caliphate who killed the father of the

imam, had also killed the 12th imam, but he did it in secret, and as people did not see a corpse,

did not lay him in a coffin, did not pray over him, and did not carry him to the cemetery, they were

hoping that he was still alive, and they inherited this idea or hope along the centuries.

Even the Sunnis, when they are weak, they wait for the Mahdi. If you were to study all the

pronouncements of Al-Mahdi, and read what the writers wrote, you would find that they said that

these were the hopes of the oppressed. In their views Jesus will come to kill the pig; therefore no

Muslim is allowed to kill a pig if it belonged to a Christian, and you are not allowed to break their

crosses, because there is no coercion in faith. You can only say kindly to the Christians that Jesus

allowed you many things that were forbidden to Jews as a punishment from God to the Jews for

crimes they committed.

I have seen many of those who claimed to be Al-Mahdi, and I lived with one of them in prison.

Some individuals in Sudan claimed to be Al-Mahdi, and others in the Islamic world claimed the

same. Some Hadith say: As if Jesus descends upon you and does this-or-that. I attribute these

stories to the influence of the Christian culture, and that they were attributed by mistake to the

prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him.

We even hear some Hadith, which are properly authenticated, attributing to God Almighty that he

created the earth on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, and created the entire heavens

in two days. Reason tells you that this is silly. The words day and days ’of your God" are as eternal

as a thousand years; here the thousand is not "999 + 1" because in the language of the Arabs (of

that time) a thousand is the highest number. However, you will find this in Sahih Muslim — one of

the two main authorities on authenticated Hadith. The days are extensive eras whose length we do

not know at all.

Muslims do not talk about the seventh day, but I talked about it in my book, Al-Tafsir al-Tawhidi,

and those who want to read about it can read the book, as I do not wish to burden your newspaper

with sensationalism.

"I urge the Muslims not sit down lazily"

This leads to talking about the awaited for Mahdi, and your rejection of the Hadith about him?

Al -Turabi : As I said, there are a number of Hadith, but I urge the Muslims not sit down lazily

waiting for someone to fill the earth with justice for them, while they do not wish to work to fill a

single inch of the earth with justice. Today the entire earth is engulfed in a darkness of injustice.

The Muslims are not imposing justice, and they are waiting for it to come from heaven, as if they

are saying the same as the Jews said to Moses, "Go thou, and thy Lord, and fight ye two, while we

sit here and watch (Koran verse)."

I say to the Muslims, you all, God willing, are Mahdis. At least 17 times every day, if not more in

prayers, you ask God to guide you to the right path. Have you lost hope that God will respond to

you and you become Mahdis? If you have, then you would have abandoned what you read in your

prayers. As for waiting for the one who will come at the end of time in his name and with signs on

his back, and for whom the Muslims are waiting, this is wishful thinking, the same as the people of


6/9



the book thought that success and piety would come to them just by hoping.

You are waiting for Jesus to return to repair the earth for you after you corrupted it, while you sit

down and watch. You do not fear God, but you fear authority and the tyranny of the superpowers.

God is greater than all of us, and is more deserving of your fear. Do not say we have been

oppressed on earth, as the Koran mentions, but rely on God in what you do.

Look how many years have passed since these Hadith were related. All these Muslims who died

say to God Almighty we did not do anything, and the Muslims deteriorated and became backward

after their original rise, because they were waiting for the grace of God to send them the one who

would repair everything as he stipulated, and because the only thing that the Muslims would have

to do in their rise is to rely on God.

However, you can read about the Hadith of the Mahdi in new books I compiled and presented

together, the Mahdis of the successors of the prophet are all those who follow the prophet, God’s

prayer and peace be upon him, on the path of God’s guidance; they are not only two or four

individuals, but there are hundreds of them in science and politics, and in all the fields of Muslims.

Shari’ah in Sudanese capital

Let us conclude this section of jurisprudence and shari’ah by a question about the issue on

which there is a stalemate between the government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement

[SPLM], namely that Khartoum should be exempted from shari’ah?

Al -Turabi : Here, we come to the issues of authority that those who believe in divine rights and the

clerics, despite their knowledge of God’s book to which they are witnesses, leave up to the

caesars and emperors to rule contrary to what God ordered. When the Koran refers to those who

rule contrary to God’s orders as the infidels, it does not refer only to those in authority. There have

been Muslim believers in divine rights and clerics who say that usury is allowed when necessary,

and should be assessed by the finance minister and the guardian.

However, when the prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, was stricken by extreme

poverty in Medina, the Koran did not give him dispensation to resort to usury, the Koran did not

change the verse saying that if you devour usury then there will be a war between you and God to

say, "Except you, Muhammad, are exempted, because you are poor."

The Naivasha agreement (over peace with the SPLM), as you know, abolished the shari’ah

completely from the federal government, but this did not stir up the anger of those who today

clamour angrily for the shari’ah. The agreement left it up to the northern provinces to adopt what

they wanted from the shari’ah; now the capital wants to adopt what it wants from the shari’ah.

When we extended the hand of peace to the brothers in the south, we did that because the state

and society of Islam were established from day one on the basis that the society consists of

Muslims and non-Muslims; this was the first Sunni model.

Had these people left us to continue to negotiate, then we would have ended up with something

better than what they reached. Today, they are in a dilemma over the capital, and there is

controversy. Do not ask me for a fatwa for those who did not ask for a fatwa, and did not ask about

the issues of shari’ah, religion and language during the negotiations.

The constitution in our hands today does not include shari’ah in the federal government to enable

us to search for a way out for those in Khartoum and around it. Silence about everything that is

done by those in authority is the same disease that has been inflicted upon the Westerners. Who

allowed usury in the West? It was allowed for the Renaissance, and for the capitalist bourgeois

revolution, which was also driven by the Jews with their financial experiments who charged usury

and devoured it. These people allowed usury after it was prohibited in Christianity, may God

shelter us.

"Islamic tide"

After Hamas, and before it the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, won democratic elections, does this

not mean that the Islamic movement in Sudan was hasty in rushing to jump to power through a

military coup d’etat in 1989, while it was clear from the course of events that it was the

overwhelming winner during the partisan period before the coup d’etat?

Al -Turabi : Now, the Islamic tide has developed in the Muslim society, and advanced across theearth in the Arab, Western and African societies, not all of them but in the majority of them. If the

way is to be opened for these people, as it was opened in Palestine, then all these regimes will

end up where Fatah has ended up, and Islam will be established. Now, the people in the West are

confused, for them democracy is a higher value, but the rise of Islam and the resurrection of its

civilization at the expense of the Western civilization would have grave consequences, because

civilization is a higher value than democracy.

Today, they are talking explicitly that had they known that Hamas would achieve such a win, they

would have blocked all the doors; they did not know, and Hamas itself, even in its innermost, did

not think that it would achieve this victory. As for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the West did

not allow them even the legitimacy of forming a party in a democratic framework; the Muslim

Brotherhood fielded candidates in half of the seats, and had they all won, then the other side

would have known that the brotherhood had won, and hence as soon as the number of

brotherhood winning candidates reached double figures, the other side hastened to block the road

publicly in broad daylight.


7/9



Before that, in Algeria, the West realized that the first round would knock out the regime, not only

its representatives but also its direction, and that the system emerging through democracy would

be an Islamic one. The prophets used to say, "And if there is a party among you who believes in

the message with which we have been sent, and a party which does not believe, hold yourselves in

patience." The prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, received the Koran verses telling

him to allow freedoms, so that we would see who has the ultimate reward. What happened in

Algeria was that the experiment was suppressed and buried by force. They are doing the same in

Turkey.

In Sudan, Islam progressed much further than it did in other countries; we came closer to power

and to government than the totality of the Sunni world. When we achieved something by

announcing laws linked to shari’ah during the final days of former President Al -Nimeiri, Bush

Senior said to Al-Nimeiri: Who are these people you brought in? Send them to prison. Al-Nimeiridid, and we were sent directly from the palace to prison.

When Al-Nimeiri saw the Islamic popular tide, he wanted to do something to compete with the

influence of the Islamic movement. Al-Nimeiri started his conquests; he prohibited alcohol, banned

usury, theoretically not practically, and started to talk about the Islamic ethics as one of the

qualifications of those assuming public posts. Then he received warnings from the West, and he

personally went to reassure them that all those people (the Islamists) were in prison.

When Al-Nimeiri was toppled, and the popular revolution [April 6, 1985] you know came, and we

joined forces with former Premier Al-Sadiq al-Mahdi, "before he achieved the imamate status," the

armed forces came to him openly and said: Remove these people or we would remove you. He

told us this, and later on he announced it. We made a mistake in not leaving it up to the popular

revolution to bring about Islam, and we left it up to the soldiers.

Since the days of the Pharaohs, the soldiers do not like shura (consultations); they like giving

orders. Therefore, when they established themselves in authority, they were seduced by it, and

they turned against the era of the constitution, which was moving the people toward freedom anddemocracy, and toward spreading the federal rule. From the beginning, we did not want to

monopolize power, oppress the people, and devour their money through corruption of government.

We read in the Koran that the chosen people who went out with Moses, peace be upon him, were

given control over land that they hated to enter at first, and said to Moses: "O Moses! In this land

there are a people of exceeding strength; never shall we enter it until they leave it." When they

were given control, the Koran said about them, "Twice would they do mischief on earth and be

elated with mighty arrogance," then they would be punished with people given to terrible warfare,

but God would grant the Jews a victory against these people; if the Jews were to spread corruption

again, then the punishment would be final and all that fell into their power would be destroyed

completely.

We did not want t he "National Islamic Front" or the soldiers to ru le in the name of the

Islamic movement, but others preferred this. I know that this military spirit corrupted the

Orthodox Caliphate era, and it teaches those under its control the traditions of the soldiers

and of caesar’s empire since the pagan days.

I am not going to mention names in order not to arouse the anger of some Muslims. The pagan

spirit and the Roman culture destroyed the experiment of the orthodox nation rule in Islam, and did

not allow it to develop along the lines according to which it started. The Orthodox Caliphates used

to be elected, held to account, and considered equal to all other Muslims. This was our mistake,

and God has held us to account for it, He even let us be sent to prison. Perhaps, God

willing, this would be a penance for the mistake in our ij tihad [struggles].

I do not want the Islamic movement to fire at a head of state and kill him, because this happened

before but it did not lead to anything. I do not want the Islamic movement and revolution to end up

the same as the revolution in Algeria or Afghanistan. The revolution is all right, but after the

revolution do not terrorize the people or kill them. The revolution ought to leave the people, as the

prophet did, to coexist and reconcile to each other; everyone should be allowed to do what he

likes, and we will see who will be rewarded by God in this life and also in the afterlife; also we

should consult the people always.

If oppression and persecution were to increase, then it would be all right to rebel, "But if you show

patience, that is indeed the best course for those who are patient [Koran verse]." The jihad verses

are all defensive, and the fighting verses are all defensive. They talk about the sword verses, and

say that they have superseded all the other verses; however this would be a deviation from the

contexts of the Koran. They also took the Hadith out of context, "Kill whoever changes his religion,"

as if whoever changes his religion, if he were an infidel and converted to Islam, should be killed.

However, praise be to God, the Koran verses are clear; I do not say abandon the Hadith of the

prophet, God’s prayer and peace be upon him, because the Hadith explains the Koran, but I say it

is better to read the Koran as a context of the Hadith, then you will find that the Hadith is the best

explanation of the Koran.

Darfur crises

This brings up to your ijtihad that intellectual apostasy is not a cause for killing. As you know, in

Afghanistan a Muslim citizen became an apostate, and was sentenced, but he was released on the

pretext that he was imbalanced. The effect of this story extended even to international relations


8/9



and foreign policy, as Italy gave him asylum?

Al -Turabi : There are a huge number of verses in the Koran, and it is difficult to recite them all.

Even the people of the book, we argue with them nicely, except those who are unjust, and we

believe in their prophets, and their books, even if they were altered. We should be kind to them if

they do not initiate fighting against us, we should treat them fairly, and we should hold them to a

fair and straight word between us and say to them let us discuss it.

More than once you said that you could resolve the problem of Darfur in a single session. What

is the secret of this session, which you are reluctant to grant to the people of Sudan?

Al -Turabi : I do not possess the weapons with which we could hit the Darfur resistance, or the

public money that is under the control of those in power. However, I am talking about the issues

and our plans as a party. We have drawn up a complete paper in Arabic and in English about all

the contentious issues in Darfur. Let me summarize it for you:

There is a model of what is to be done between us and the southern population. Take this model

and apply it to Darfur; however, they do not accept this because they are Muslims and all of them

speak Arabic. Thus all the problems could be resolved; the vice-presidency problems [could be

resolved]; at the regional level coordination could be established between the provinces so that the

centre does not divide them and assumes supremacy over them; and their old borders from which

their camel exports used to cross into Egypt, and their representation quota in the legislative

councils, which have become appointed councils, are no longer suitable.

However, if they take their share, this will be deducted from the absolute majority share possessed

and monopolized by the ruling party, and which is now demanded by the party’s partners in the

south, i.e. 52 per cent.

I have never seen a constitution in the world that does such things. They also want their share of

the public funds, with something extra, as they have been wronged since the days of the British

occupation, because they publicly stood by the side of the Ottomans and also of the Germansagainst them.

As a result of this stance, they were deprived of roads, education and all aspects of development.

Also the nationalists, the successors of the British, followed the example of the British, and did the

same to the people of Darfur. Now they want a slightly larger share than the public funds allocated

to the provinces. Give them this, and let them govern themselves during an interim period. Even

the elections in which people compete; let national and regional parties fight these elections and let

the elections decide who assumes power in the province, and who assumes power at a national

level.

This is all. It is simple. Today there are two million Sudanese refugees, and the entire Sudan,

people and government, do not pay a single dinar for these refugees. These refugees are

separated from their kinfolk, and the government spurns them; they are looked after by Western

and UN organizations. The African forces are present only in the city, while the entire Darfur area

is abandoned as an armed-robbery battlefield, not only for the Janjawid militias, the resistance,

and the Sudanese forces, but also armed robbery has become a way of life.

Every day people are dying as result of displacement and illness, education has virtually ground to

a halt, and hygiene is deteriorating. All this happens while we sit down and wait for those in the

seats of power as they enjoy themselves. Should we postpone the negotiations from one session

to another, or should we deal with the issue as we dealt with the south, and hence dispense with

the foreign presence.

However, we hear people screaming and wailing about the interference of the foreign powers. The

Africans are welcome, and we are pleased to carry them on our heads (Arabic figure of speech

expressing welcome); are they not foreigners?!

In the issue of the south, thousands are welcome, the international police forces and their dogs are

welcome, and we are pleased to carry them on our heads, this is a literal truth, and not a figure of

speech.

Chadian war

What is your opinion of the recent incidents in Chad?

Al -Turabi : Chad was stormed by soldiers. I wonder whether they descended from heaven, or

sprang up from under the earth. What is the name of the country to the east of Chad? This is first.

How did President Idriss Deby himself enter Chad? Who was behind them, and who urged him?

How did the Chadian ruler who preceded Deby enter Chad? These are known issues that no-one

can deny. The telephones are known, the roads are known, the way they struck is known, and who

they are and what documents are in their hands is known.

The Darfur issue and the Chad issue are the same; the Darfur issue has gone beyond the borders

of the area and even the borders of the African continent, and has become an international issue;

it would be better if we hasten to resolve it.

(ST)


9/9


ABOUT SUDAN TRIBUNE

ARABIC VERSION

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US

Copyright © 2003-2015 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.
http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=abouthttp://www.sudantribune.net/http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=backendhttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=contacthttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=contacthttp://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=backendhttp://www.sudantribune.net/http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=about

hassan turabi accuses islamic clerics of misunderstanding

Documents