harvard formatted paper
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Harvard formatted paper](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081004/55c13ee1bb61eb9a1f8b4747/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Jefferson Vs Hamilton: Confrontations That Shaped A Nation
Name:
Course:
Tutor:
College:
Date:
![Page 2: Harvard formatted paper](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081004/55c13ee1bb61eb9a1f8b4747/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
JEFFERSON VS HAMILTON: CONFRONTATIONS THAT SHAPED A NATION 2
This book documents the studies of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, focusing
on their diverging views on society and the government in the infant years of the American
nation. From my reading, I have learnt that the book is actually a collection of not less than 40
documents, which have been developed into 7 chronological chapters. The lives of the two men
are followed, right from their youth, then during the Revolutionary war to Hamilton’s death in
1804. The book’s plot development is such that, in every chapter, there are excerpts from these
two men’s public papers as well as their private letters. These papers and letters reveal the men’s
often differing views, not only on the government but also on the constitution. Differences are
also brought out vividly on these men’s discordant views on the military, foreign and economic
policy and illustrate their roles in the coming up of political parties.
Prior to reading this particular book, I admit that I could only have listed the basic facts
on Thomas Jefferson. In addition, I had a vague idea about the person of Alexander Hamilton
and his contributions as one of America’s founding fathers. Now I know better. Both of them
could foresee this nation as a future super power. What differed was each individual’s map on
how to get the country there. For instance, on the one hand, Jefferson preferred an agricultural
nation, whose power resided in the states (Noble 2007, p. 32). The book clearly highlights his
opposition to a centralized authority. On the other hand, Hamilton emphasizes a strong
centralized authority that would provide order to enable business and industries grow. The book
clearly cuts an industrialist figure in Hamilton. Unlike Jefferson, Hamilton was for the idea that
the government ought to be run by the educated and the wealthy and not by the “mob.”
Any lover of American history and politics would surely be interested knowing how the
different political parties evolved. After reading this particular book, I was able to get to the root
![Page 3: Harvard formatted paper](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081004/55c13ee1bb61eb9a1f8b4747/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
JEFFERSON VS HAMILTON: CONFRONTATIONS THAT SHAPED A NATION 3
of this. It was the conflict between Jefferson and Hamilton that gave rise to the political parties
system (Noble 2007, p. 53). This conflict polarized the factions on the divergent political sides.
The book shows the evidence that both men had a good vision for future America.
Towards the end of the book, it is likely that any critical reader would find it important to
evaluate the two men’s views. To me, I can not, in definite terms; state whether either of the two
views was better or worse for the American nation. However, if I were to make a choice between
Jefferson and Hamilton, I would most probably be inclined towards Hamilton’s view. This is not
to say that Jefferson’s ideas were entirely wrong, though. In the book, Hamilton comes out as a
strong, visionary industrialist. Moreover, he advocates a centralized authority and this idea were
credited with the nation’s ability to sustain it during the early days. For example, during the
Shayes Rebellion crisis, order was reinstated (Noble 2007, p. 76).
Are you into the American history and also have a craving for knowing how the politics
of the early America shook out? If yes, then this book is a great study. It also brings about some
comfort to know that, as bad as we take today’s politicians to be, politics has always been a dirty
game. According to Ecclesiastes, “there is nothing new under the sun.” The book provides the
reader with an excellent angle detailing how the federalists and anti-federalists shaped the
American nation via the press and debates. The book also provides a collection public papers and
letters from both Presidents. This is important because the reader is left to interpret the
personalities and stances of the two men for themselves. However, I feel that Noble, E.
Cunningham left out valuable information by limiting the number of pages, considering the fact
that there are large volumes of available materials from and on the two men.
![Page 4: Harvard formatted paper](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081004/55c13ee1bb61eb9a1f8b4747/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
JEFFERSON VS HAMILTON: CONFRONTATIONS THAT SHAPED A NATION 4
Bibliography
Noble, E. Cunningham Jr. 2007. Jefferson vs. Hamilton: Confrontation That Shaped a Nation.1st
ed. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.