harrison county, co evaluation and compensation system

28
Harrison County, CO Evaluation and Compensation System

Upload: wyome

Post on 09-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Harrison County, CO Evaluation and Compensation System. Harrison’s demographics. 693 teachers 10,600 students 74% free and reduced lunch 72% minority Urban, located within the city of Colorado Springs. Harrison’s new salary schedule. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Harrison County, CO Evaluation and Compensation System

Page 2: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Harrison’s demographics

693 teachers 10,600 students 74% free and reduced lunch 72% minority Urban, located within the city of Colorado

Springs

Page 3: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System
Page 4: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System
Page 5: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System
Page 6: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System
Page 7: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System
Page 8: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System
Page 9: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Harrison’s new salary schedule

Novice Progressing Proficient Exemplary Master

I I II I II III I II I

$35,000 $38,000 $44,000 $48,000 $54,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000

Each year, teachers are evaluated and assigned to one of nine effectiveness levels:

Page 10: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Top salary

Before: $68,000 Now: $90,000

Page 11: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

How teachers are rated:

50/50

Classroom observation

Student Achievement

Six traditional metrics1. Quality of instruction2. Student engagement

3. Effective strategies and practices

4. Curriculum alignment

5. Classroom management

6. Other criteria

A combination of 8 measures that involve: 1. Classroom scores on both the

state test and district ssessments

2. School-wide scores on the state test

3. A student achievement goal set by the teacher

Page 12: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Classroom observations Frequent “spot observations” of all teachers (10 to

15 minute walk throughs). Non-tenured teachers 8 times each semester. Tenured teachers 4 times each semester.

All teachers are formally observed 2 times a year. All teachers receive 1 summative evaluation each

year, summarizing the spot and formal evals, and determining annual rating and salary.

C Walsh
Any details that distinguish formal from spot? Any detaisl that distinguish summative from formal?
C Walsh
Any details that distinguish formal from spot? Any detaisl that distinguish summative from formal?
Tucker, Aljean
Any details that distinguish formal from spot? Any detaisl that distinguish summative from formal?
Tucker, Aljean
A formal observation is of a longer observation time period and includes a pre and post conference. It is also mandated by Co. law.A summative evaluation is a written form that summarizes the formal and spot observations done in a year.
Page 13: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

State tests

As federal law requires, all students in grades 3 through 10 are tested by the state in language arts, mathematics and science.

Page 14: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

District tests Every grade and subject administers “progress

monitoring assessments”4 common assessments during the year

2 assessments administered at the end of semester In non-tested subjects and grades, the district’s

teachers have agreed upon a set of performance measures. Retired teachers evaluate teachers each year on a set of

standard performance metrics

Page 15: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Teachers must meet an objective standard of performance to progress from one level to another.

District established a “target distribution” range for each of the 8 effectiveness levels

District intentionally established a positively skewed distribution (meaning the majority of current teachers would be found proficient and progressing)

District set “cut scores” for each level that was based on past student achievement data, so that the actual distribution would approximate our target distribution.

Page 16: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

The student learning measures for a 4th grade teacher

The specific measures vary grade to grade, subject to subject.

Weight Type Tested subjects

25% Classroom score on STATE test Reading, writing, math

25% Classroom performance on DISTRICT summative test (2x/yr)

Reading, writing, math, science

25% Classroom performance on DISTRICT progress monitoring test

Reading, math and writing

12.5% School-wide score on STATE test Reading, writing, math

12.5% Teacher’s own selection of a goal for student achievement

--

Page 17: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Multiple measures brought to life

State Tests District (Performance) District (Summative) District (Progress monitoring Individual goal set by teacher

Page 18: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

The student learning measures for a 10th grade English teacher

The specific measures vary grade to grade, subject to subject.

Weight Type Tested subjects

25% Classroom score on STATE test Reading, writing, English

25% DISTRICT tests (summative; administered 2x year)

Reading, writing, communicating

25% DISTRICT test (Progress monitoring and timed constructed response)

Reading, writing, communicating

12.5% School-wide score on STATE test Reading, writing, math

12.5% Teacher’s own selection of a goal for student achievement

--

C Walsh
does this look different for a 12th grade AP English teacher? a 12th grade regular English teacher? Are there performance measures that get factored in for those teachers?
Ruckstuhl, Margaret
Yes, they can be different.An AP English teacher will have one less weight on the State asssemsents, and will have additional weights on the AP Exams. I have added a chart after this one if you would like to use it as a comparisonThe 12th grade English teacher will still have 2 weights on a high stakes test, it will just be on the Accuplacer English assessment (and not on the ACT or our state CSAP). They would use this same distribution of weights. The W1W2 is for CSAP, CO-ACT, and.or Accuplacer, depending on the grade level taught.
Page 19: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

The student learning measures for a high school AP English teacher

The specific measures vary grade to grade, subject to subject.

Weight Type Tested subjects

12.5% Classroom score on STATE test Reading, writing, English

37.5% AP Exams English

25% DISTRICT tests (summative; administered 2x year)

English

12.5% Schoolwide score on state tests Reading, writing, math

12.5% Teacher’s own selection of a goal for student achievement

--

Page 20: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

The student learning measures for a high school art teacher

The specific measures vary grade to grade, subject to subject.

Weight Type Tested subjects

25% DISTRICT performance test (end of year performance; external scoring)

Art

25% DISTRICT summative test Art

25% DISTRICT TESTS (Progress monitoring and timed constructed response)

Art

12.5% Schoolwide score on state tests Reading, writing, math

12.5% Teacher’s own selection of a goal for student achievement

--

Page 21: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Art Grade 3 In the space below, create an abstract or realistic drawing of an animal.

Use at least two different shapes.

Use at least one type of line.

Show balance in the drawing.

Your drawing will be scored on: Are all parts of the drawing neat and finished?How well were shapes, line, and balance used?

A sample of performance measures for non-tested teachers

Page 22: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

A before picture

Page 23: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Unsatisfactory Progressing I Progressing II Proficient I Proficient II Proficient III Exemplary0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0

13

23

47

11

42

Where teachers fall on the scale: 2010-2011 Results

And after: The results produce a standard bell curve, reflecting true performance.

Page 24: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

What happened in the first year (2010-2011)

Modest achievement gains in most areas: Significant growth at high school level

25% of the teacher workforce left: Includes retirements, non-renewals, and resignations Majority of teachers leaving were not rated proficient or higher.

Actual distribution came close to the target distribution. Overall percentage of money spent on salaries remained the

same.

Page 25: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

How often are teachers eligible for a raise?

Teachers are eligible for advancement each year. The fastest a current teacher can make it to the top “Master” level

is 6 years A novice teacher can make it in 8 years.

A teacher can stay at the same level indefinitely. However, ineffective teachers will eventually be moved out

A teacher can be downgraded but only after receiving low marks three years in a row.

Its easier to get promotions at the lower levels than higher. An exceptionally distinguished teacher can skip a level one time in a

career.

Page 26: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

How Harrison pays for its plan:

It is not an incentive pay plan. It uses the same percentage of general fund dollars as before that

went to teacher salaries Teachers receive no raises associated with experience or

advanced degrees. Teachers are not paid to attend professional development. District eliminated extra pay for mentoring or department

chairs. MOST IMPORTANT: Teachers don’t get raises every year. Every three years, the district will decide if a Cost of Living

raise is in order.

Page 27: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

How it is manageable:

Only the district can decide if a teacher qualifies for the four top levels of effectiveness. District staff evaluates these teachers.

All school levels have assistant principals who also evaluate teachers and are trained to be instructional leaders.

If rate of promotions is not financially sustainable, cut scores can be adjusted.

Page 28: Harrison  County, CO  Evaluation and Compensation System

Teacher satisfaction:

In a survey conducted in the fall of 2010:69% of staff agreed that compensation should be

based on performance and student achievement results

Only 13% disagreed55% of staff agreed that a pay for performance

plan would be good for students’ academic success

Only 14% disagreed