handling whistleblower claims: new opportunities create more complex and emerging issues for...
DESCRIPTION
The panel will explore in depth the fast-changing legal landscape for whistleblowers while offering practical insight on the latest issues. Topics covered will include: latest developments on forum and claim selection for relaxed burdens of proof; financial incentives and other remedies; managing thorny confidentiality issues; handling highly public whistleblower cases; contingent labor as whistleblowers; mandatory arbitration (or not); and key recent cases defining the scope of protected activities.TRANSCRIPT
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Title: Handling Whistleblower Claims: New Opportunities Create More Complex and Emerging Issues for Employment Lawyers
MARCH 20, 2014 |
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
SOX 806 – Who is Covered?
• Company that registers a class of securities under Section 12 of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act
• Company that is required to file reports with the Securities Exchange Commission under Section 15(d) of the 1934 Act
• A subsidiary or affiliate whose financial information is included in the consolidated financial statement of one of these
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
SOX 806 – Who is Covered?
• A nationally recognized statistical rating organization
• Any “officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor or agent of such company or nationally recognized statistical rating organization”
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
“Officer, Employee, Contractor, Subcontractor or Agent”
• Lawson v. FMR, No. 12-3 (Mar. 4, 2014)– SOX protects employees of a public
company's private contractors and subcontractors (and their babysitters)
– Essentially same decision as ARB decision Spinner v. David Landau & Assocs. LLC, No. 10-111 (ARB May 31, 2012), but did not defer to ARB
– Majority declined to adopt (but did not rule out) limiting principles
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Impact of Lawson
• What is the statute’s reach? – Employees of 5,000 public companies– Employees of 6 million private companies– Untold millions of employees of public
company employees and officers • Impact on mutual fund industry and law and
accounting firms, private businesses generally• Steps private companies should take to prevent
SOX claims• Can OSHA handle?
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Sarbanes-Oxley Protected Conduct
• Sylvester v. Parexel Int’l, LLC, ARB 07-123, 2011 WL 2165854 (May 25, 2011) – Protected conduct not limited to disclosures of
shareholder fraud and C need not prove each element of fraud (scienter, materiality, etc.)
– Disclosure about a potential violation protected– Abandons prior ARB’s Platone decision requiring that
disclosure “definitively and specifically relate” to a violation of one of the categories of fraud or SEC rule violations
– Iqbal/Twombly pleading standard does not apply to claims filed at OSHA
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Sarbanes-Oxley Protected Conduct
• Will federal courts adopt Sylvester?– Weist v. Lynch, 710 F.3d 121 (3rd Cir. 2013)– Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Administrative
Review Bd., 717 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir. 2013)– But see Gauthier v. Shaw Group, Inc., 2012
WL 6043012 (W.D.N.C. 2012); Andaya v. Atlas Air, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78654, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); Nielsen v. AECOM Tech. Corp., 2012 WL 6200613 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Dodd-Frank Act Protected Conduct
• 3 employment anti-retaliation provisions: Securities Exchange Act, Commodity Exchange Act (“SEA”), Consumer Financial Protection Act
• Under SEA, protected activity if:
– Provided information to the SEC ;
– Provided assistance in any SEC;
– Made required or protected disclosures under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . . .
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Dodd-Frank Act Protected Conduct
• Does it protect internal disclosures?– No -- Asadi v. G.E. General (USA), L.L.C.,
720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013) – Yes – a number of district court have adopted
a contrary position, including two opinions post-Asadi
– Yes – SEC filed Second Circuit amicus brief
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Mandatory Arbitration
• SOX claims are exempt from mandatory arbitration
• Dodd-Frank Act claims appear to be subject to mandatory arbitration– Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-
05914-KPF (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2014)
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Forum Selection
• Kick-out provision in SOX may become more attractive due to recent jury verdicts– Zulfer v. Playboy (C.D.Ca. 2014) $6M– Jones v. Southpeak Interactive (E.D.Va.
2013) $178,500 in compensatory damages reduced to $123,000
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Protections for Employees of Government Contractors
• Broader scope of protected conduct under the False Claims Act’s anti-retaliation provision post-2009 FCA amendments– Protects “other efforts to stop 1 or more
violations of [the FCA]”• Post-Nassar, courts are imposing a “but for”
causation standard
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
NDAA Whistleblower Provisions
• Sections 827 and 828 of NDAA became effective July 2013
• Broad scope of protected conduct– Gross mismanagement, gross waste, abuse
of authority;– violations of law, rule, or regulation relating to
contracts, including competition for a contract; or
– substantial and specific danger to public health or safety
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
NDAA Whistleblower Provisions
• Employee-favorable causation standard• Requires exhaustion at agency OIG• 210-day kick-out provision• Damages include reinstatement, backpay,
compensatory damages, and attorney fees and costs.
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Hot Topics
• Settlement issues– DOL review of confidentiality clauses
• Parallel investigations• OSHA enforcement trends• September 2013 OSHA order awarding $1.9
million to a former CFO• Managing thorny confidentiality issues• Extraterritoriality
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Whistleblower Filings at OSHA