hana nihill /// arch portfolio
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
I have recently commenced my postgraduate studies in architecture at the University of
Melbourne. My undergraduate years, also at Melbourne, saw me complete my Bachelor of
Environments degree majoring in Architecture. Throughout my time as an undergraduate I
spent two years living at Ormond college, a residential college affiliated with the university,
where I held various leadership positions including editor of the college’s annual academic
journal and faculty representative. Living at college meant that during college breaks I was
able to return to my family in London whereI have been living intermittently for the past
three years. My main architectural interests centre themselves around the concept of agency
in architecture and how it can be parcelled out to the architect or users respectively. I am
particularly interested in the way the transition from design to fabrication can mediate this
process and assist in creating systems rather than spaces.
The projects that follow represent some of the key moments from my architectural education
so far, be they representations of skill acquirement or a step forward in the way my design
process works. I hope they are as illuminating for you as they were for me.
About///Hana Nihill
+61 407 730 [email protected]
225 Flemington Road, North Melbourne, 3051
EducationBEnvs (H2A -78%- average) Unimelb
MArch Unimelb (Commencing 03.03.2015)
Previous Work ExperienceCommunity service trip to Borneo where
a group of students and I helped to
design and build a school in a remote
village.
Urbis Consulting Company
Worked as an intern in International
Property Economics, Urban Planning and
Landscape architecture divisions.
Tutoring For Excellence maths and
english tutor
Private Tutor in high school maths
Architectural Visualisation Consultant
Leadership Positions School Prefect
Designer of and contributor to Ormond
Papers
Environments Faculty Representative
20142015
2012
2013
2013
2013-2014
20112013
2014
2015
ReferencesDomenic Trimboli /// Proffessional
Architecture Tutor at Ormond College and
University of Melbourne
P: +61 439 963 574
John Harris /// Personal
History and English tutor
PhD candidate University of Melbourne
P: +61 432 097 475
5
Paper Lanterns
This wearable lantern represents one of the first
architecture projects I attempted at university. I soon came
to realise that it falls into a longstanding architectural
tradition that concerns itself with the way architecture
reacts with the human body but at the time, trying to get
the previously untried software (Rhino) to produce a model
that would somehow fit around my neck felt like impossible
alchemy. Regardless, the design process took me through
an exploration of the natural errosive process -that reccurs
throughout nature- and introduced a series of digital
fabrication techniques that eventually produced the latern
to the left. Intended to create an immersive experience, the
lantern is worn around the neck so the light falls directly
onto the face and becomes the definitive component of the
wearers immediate context.
6
1 /// Sketched design development
2 /// Digital itterations
7
3 /// Model Experimentation
This proposal was developed in response to the L(and)A(rt)G(enerator)I(nitiave) in 2014 when the
competition was based in Copenhagen. The design was pursued through an itterative process
that began with concept sketches and developed into grasshopper models and physical models.
One of the key factors influencing the design was its efficiency in generating electricity. This
then had to be weighed against the amenity being provided to the residents of Copenhagen
and the design’s potential for re-vitalising the greenfeilds site it was situated on. Using this
workflow allowed for a rigorous assessment of each of these paramaters, as seen below in step
four where the energy efficiency for several different itterations is explored to find the most
efficient outcome.
4 /// Digital design justification
Generating Change
7
3 /// Model Experimentation
This proposal was developed in response to the L(and)A(rt)G(enerator)I(nitiave) in 2014 when the
competition was based in Copenhagen. The design was pursued through an itterative process
that began with concept sketches and developed into grasshopper models and physical models.
One of the key factors influencing the design was its efficiency in generating electricity. This
then had to be weighed against the amenity being provided to the residents of Copenhagen
and the design’s potential for re-vitalising the greenfeilds site it was situated on. Using this
workflow allowed for a rigorous assessment of each of these paramaters, as seen below in step
four where the energy efficiency for several different itterations is explored to find the most
efficient outcome.
4 /// Digital design justification
Generating Change
11
The New Normal
The New Normal is a proposal for a new achives building
at the University of Melbourne. The building references
a cloister to induce a meditative quality in the centre of
the space. The walls facing brunswick in Melbourne are
solid, moving into a much more porous, glazed area in
the interior. Throughout the building there is a constant
visual connection to the archives, or to archival
activities, reinforcing the importance of the buildings
central function to the whole program.
13
Coffee Craze
The combination of a gallery, cafe and bookstore made for a challenging
brief. The solution in this proposal was to design furniture for the space
that was moveable and modular so that each of the spaces could be
reconfigured to suit the needs of each program. The central bench, as
seen above, serves as a coffee station, a seating area and a space for
book and 3D art display. This idea permeated the rest of the store with
the shelving above able to become seating towards the base and then art
space above. The
Ben Quilty_ Gallery This project was one in a series of art galleries designed for “Gift to the City”, a studio loosely based
around Dostoyevsky’s Notes from Underground. This model proposed a ‘wicked space’ that challenged
the autonomy of the architecture and the agency of the architect in an attempt to create a more liberal
space for the art to express itself. Instead of designing a traditional gallery space with prescriptive
ciculation, patterns of opening and the like, a system was designed whereby the subject could arrange
the model themselves and create a ‘mindscape’ of sorts. Drawing heavily on Derrida’s critique of Plato’s
pharmakon, the space was intended as a language that engendered an imaginative process that would
create an internal architecture that would be more subjectively meaningful than any more defined
space.