hacking the body 2.0: flutter/stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/icli_proceedings/2016/... · hacking...

6
Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio 1 , Camille Baker 2 , Tara Baoth Mooney 3 , and Rebecca Stewart 4 1 Parsons The New School for Design New York, New York, USA [email protected] 2 University for the Creative Arts Epsom, Surrey, UK [email protected] 3 University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK [email protected] 4 Queen Mary University of London London, UK [email protected] Abstract. Flutter/Stutter is an improvisational dance piece, part of the Hacking the Body 2.0 project, that uses networked soft circuit sensors to trigger sound and haptic actuators in the form of a small motor that tickles the performers. Dancers embody the flutter of the motor and respond with their own movement that reflects this feeling. This research explores using the concept of hacking data to repurpose and re-imagine biofeedback from the body. It investigates understandings of states of the body and hacking them to make new artworks such as performance and costumes. Through performance we aim to communicate to the public new ways to engage with their bodies and technology with intimacy and sensation embedded in wearables. Keywords: Wearable tech and e-textiles, Performance, Sustainable garments, Ethical data collection. Introduction The Hacking the Body 2.0 project explores using the concept of hacking data to repurpose and re-imagine biofeedback from the body. It investigates understandings of states of the body and hacking them to make new artworks such as performance and costumes. Through performance we aim to communicate to the public new ways to engage with their bodies and technology with intimacy and sensation embedded in wearables. Flutter/Stutter is one piece within the larger Hacking the Body 2.0 research project. As such, dancers embody the flutter of the motor and respond with their own movement that reflects this feeling. The sensors and actuators, along with the garments they are embedded within, are bespoke designs by Becky Stewart and Tara Baoth Mooney that interact, influence and interrupt the dance and hack the body. Context The current technology fervour over wearable technology that collects users’ intimate body data, under the pretense of medical or fitness monitoring, highlights that it is time that critical questions were raised. The ethics of corporate ownership of body data for consumerist agendas is rarely discussed beyond the fine print on these devices. More awareness and education on these issues, would potentially allow more access, ownership, and creativity in the use of one's own body data, and ways to express personal identity through this data. This project questions how body data may be able to demonstrate who we are, through movement, through our physiology. How does access to personal data enable the performer to show their identity, rather than what is subscribed by the corporation making the sensing device? How can we explore these issues while enabling people access to their own data, especially in performance contexts, in order to interact with it?

Upload: others

Post on 15-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/ICLI_proceedings/2016/... · Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio1, Camille Baker2, Tara Baoth Mooney3,

HackingtheBody2.0:Flutter/StutterKateSicchio1,CamilleBaker2,TaraBaothMooney3,andRebeccaStewart4

1ParsonsTheNewSchoolforDesignNewYork,NewYork,[email protected]

2UniversityfortheCreativeArtsEpsom,Surrey,UK

[email protected],

Wolverhampton,[email protected]

4QueenMaryUniversityofLondonLondon,UK

[email protected]

Abstract.Flutter/Stutterisanimprovisationaldancepiece,partoftheHackingtheBody2.0project,thatusesnetworkedsoftcircuitsensorstotriggersoundandhapticactuatorsintheformofasmallmotorthatticklestheperformers.Dancersembodytheflutterofthemotorandrespondwiththeirownmovementthatreflectsthisfeeling.Thisresearchexploresusingtheconceptofhackingdatatorepurposeandre-imaginebiofeedbackfromthebody.Itinvestigatesunderstandingsofstatesofthebodyandhackingthemtomakenewartworkssuchasperformanceandcostumes.Throughperformanceweaimtocommunicatetothepublicnewwaystoengagewiththeirbodiesandtechnologywithintimacyandsensationembeddedinwearables.

Keywords:Wearabletechande-textiles,Performance,Sustainablegarments,Ethicaldatacollection.

IntroductionTheHackingtheBody2.0projectexploresusingtheconceptofhackingdatatorepurposeandre-imaginebiofeedbackfromthebody.Itinvestigatesunderstandingsofstatesofthebodyandhackingthemtomakenewartworkssuchasperformanceandcostumes.Throughperformanceweaimtocommunicatetothepublicnewwaystoengagewiththeirbodiesandtechnologywithintimacyandsensationembeddedinwearables.

Flutter/StutterisonepiecewithinthelargerHackingtheBody2.0researchproject.Assuch,dancersembodytheflutterofthemotorandrespondwiththeirownmovementthatreflectsthisfeeling.Thesensorsandactuators,alongwiththegarmentstheyareembeddedwithin,arebespokedesignsbyBeckyStewartandTaraBaothMooneythatinteract,influenceandinterruptthedanceandhackthebody.

ContextThecurrenttechnologyfervouroverwearabletechnologythatcollectsusers’intimatebodydata,underthepretenseofmedicalorfitnessmonitoring,highlightsthatitistimethatcriticalquestionswereraised.Theethicsofcorporateownershipofbodydataforconsumeristagendasisrarelydiscussedbeyondthefineprintonthesedevices.Moreawarenessandeducationontheseissues,wouldpotentiallyallowmoreaccess,ownership,andcreativityintheuseofone'sownbodydata,andwaystoexpresspersonalidentitythroughthisdata.

Thisprojectquestionshowbodydatamaybeabletodemonstratewhoweare,throughmovement,throughourphysiology.Howdoesaccesstopersonaldataenabletheperformertoshowtheiridentity,ratherthanwhatissubscribedbythecorporationmakingthesensingdevice?Howcanweexploretheseissueswhileenablingpeopleaccesstotheirowndata,especiallyinperformancecontexts,inordertointeractwithit?

Page 2: Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/ICLI_proceedings/2016/... · Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio1, Camille Baker2, Tara Baoth Mooney3,

ThenewiterationofthecollaborativeprojectHackingtheBody2.0bringsperformerstogethertoattempttoaddresstheethicalissuesaroundidentityanddataownershipwhenusingwearabletechinperformance.Theprojectdevelopsmethodstouseandhackcommercialwearabledevices,aswellasmakinghandmadee-textilessensingdevicesforperformance.Assuch,weaimtoengageperformerstoaccesstheirownphysiologicaldataforpersonaluse,butalsotocreateuniqueandinteractiveperformances.

PerformanceInvestigationsThelatestiterationofthecollaborativeprojectHackingtheBody2.0,bymediaartistCamilleBakerandmediaartist/choreographerKateSicchio,attemptedtoaddresstheethicalissuesaroundidentityanddataownershipwhenperformersusewearabletechinperformance.Theprojecthasusedvariousmethodstouseandhackcommercialwearabledevices,aswellasmakinghandmadee-textilessensingdevicesforperformanceaswasdoneforFlutter/Stutter.Assuch,weaimtoengageperformerstoaccesstheirowndataforpersonaluse,butalsotocreateuniqueandinteractiveperformances.Thiscollaborationhasbeenevolvingsince2011,andtheapproachisinfluencedbypreviousprojectsinasimilarvein,suchasthatofTheclaSchiphorstandSusanKozel’swhisper(s)project,aswellasBaker’sandSicchio’sindividualPhDresearchprojects,nottomentionthehaptic,biofeedbackandwearablemusicperformanceworks,suchasthosesuchasLoke,DonnarummaandTanaka,andmanyothersnowworkinginthisfield.YetthispieceanditspartnerperformancepieceFeelMe(alsopartofHackingtheBody2.0,butnotdiscussedhere),stakesoutasingularnewterraininitsexplorationofwaystoaddressethicalissuesofdatacollection,useofthetechnologiestorepresentpersonalidentitiesofdancers,developnon-verbalcommunicationinteractionmethodsandincorporatingalivecodingofthedancersbythechoreographerintothework.

Thegoalisto:enabledancerstointeractorrespondtowornsensorsandactuators;toinstigatenewmovement‘dialogue’orinteractionbetweenperformers;andtoexploretheiridentities.Byusingthetechnologiesdevelopedforgatheringpersonaldata,butcircumventingcorporatedatacollection,wefacilitatedirectcommunicationbetweeneachbody/dancertocreateaconversation.Atthesametime,thechoreographercanalsointervenedirectlywithandparticipateinthedialoguebetweendancers’bodiesandtheirmovementresponses,bytriggeringthechimesdirectlyforthecomputercontrollingtheinteraction.Inthisway,theperformersreclaimthedatasensingandcollectionbyusingthetechnologyasanothertooltothemhelpdevisemovementandco-createorchoreographperformanceworks.Thisworkputsintonewlight,theethicalissuesofcorporateownershipbyputtingtheownershipbackintothehandsoftheuser.Thisinturnmaybeconsideredacriticalactofmakingandconfrontationoftheissuesofsurveillanceanddatacontrol.

InFebruary2016,wewereabletotaketheprojecttotheperformancestage,withperformancesinLondonandSheffield.Flutter/Stutterwasperformedonceateachlocationinfrontofanaudience.Thechoreographicsideofthepiecefocusesontwotechnologicalaspects.Thesecanbeusedasmethodsforbothdevelopingmovementaswellasastructureforimprovisation.Firstly,thedancerswererespondingtoactuatorsontheircostumesandtoeachotherthroughmovement.Bymovinginreactiontotheseimpulsesontheirbody,therhythm,timingsanddynamicswereaffectedinafeedbackloop.Amoresubtleapproachtomovementwastakenbythedancers,toreflectthesensationofbeingtickledontheneckbyaribbononamotortriggeredbytheotherdancer.Therelationshipbetweendataandsubsequentreactivemovementsbytheperformersisthattouchontheshoulderpiecesandthesubsequentactuationresponsesaremeanttoinitiatemovementbythedancerreceivingthevibrationortickle,astheresponseinthe“callandresponse”non-verbaldialogue.Eachdanceralsohastotakeintoconsiderationhowtoinitiatethetriggeroftheactuationontheotherdancer,aspartofthe“conversation”betweenthem.

Thesecondwaythetechnologyisrepurposedintothechoreography,wasthroughthestructureoftheinteractiondesign.Thesystemwasdevelopedtoadaptandprovideseveralopportunitiesforuserinteractionsbythedancers.Thescoreforthedanceimprovisationwasthenstructuredaroundtimeandavarietyofthesedancerinteractions.Eachoneledtoadistinctmomentinthepieceandallowedtheoverallcompositiontobuildovertime.Theaudiencewasabletounderstandtheinteractionsnotonlythroughtheexpressivitybythedancersandthewayinwhichtheyhada‘callandresponse’behaviourwhenactivatingthedevices,butalsobythesoundsthegarmentsalsotriggered,tocreateaimprovisedsoundtrackofvariouslypitchedreverberantchimes.Theoperatingmodesofthesensorsand

Page 3: Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/ICLI_proceedings/2016/... · Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio1, Camille Baker2, Tara Baoth Mooney3,

actuatormaynotbeclearlydiscernedbytheaudiencethroughthesepitchedchimes,astheintentionofthepieceisnottomakeimprovisedmusic,buttoallowtheaudiencetounderstandthattheinteractionandtheactuationisliveandcreatedbythehaptics.Wechosetorestrictthesystemtouseasinglesensorandactuatoratthispointintheresearchduetofundingandtimelimitations,butintendtointroducemoresensor/actuatorsastheprojectprogresses,inordertoincreasetheperformancepotentialinfutureiterations.

WearablePerformanceSystemImplementationThesensorsandactuatorswerebuiltintogarmentswornononeshoulderofeachdancerandincorporatedintoacompletecostumewornduringperformance.Thenetworkconnectingthesensorsandactuatorsutilisedtheinfrastructuretools,emergingasthepreferredprotocolfor‘InternetofThings’applications,whilethevisualdesignofthegarmentsactivelydistanceditselffromatechnologicalaesthetic.

Figure1.ImagesfromperformanceofthepieceinFebruary2016inLondon,UK

GarmentDesignThegarments,whichhavebeencreatedforthisresearchproject,exploretheideaofmakinganddesigningforinteractiondesignthroughhacking.Allgarmentscanactasaninterfacebetweenindividualsandtheirimmediateenvironment.Thisappliestobothgarmentsforperformanceandgarmentsforeverydaywear.

Liketheacquisitionofclothingforoneoffevents,sotoogarmentswhicharecreatedforaspecificperformanceoreventcanberenderedobsoleteaftertheperformancehastakenplace.

Thiscollaborationpromptedquestionsaroundthecontinuedvalueofperformativegarmentsinaworldwhichincreasinglydevaluesobjects.Thechallengesforthegarmentdesignerinthisprojectweretocreateamodulargarmentwhichmightcontainwithinthemthepotentialtobecomesomethingelseaftertheperformanceshavetakenplace.Asecondarychallengewastoworkwiththeinteractiondesigner,RebeccaStewart,tocreateacollectionofgarmentswhichdidnotvisuallybetraythetechnologyembeddedwithinthem.

FortheFlutter/Stutterpiece,pre-existingcottont-shirtswereusedwhichwerealreadyownedbythedesigner,alongwithsomecastofflong-sleevedcottont-shirtsfoundinthriftstores,andwereconsideredasrawmaterialforanewmanifestationofthematerial.Theproductdevelopmenttookplaceovera4-monthperiod,wherethedesignerintermittentlyworkedwiththeinteractiondesignerandtheneachwithdrewtoworkalone.Thepiecesneededtobeflexibleenoughtomakesmallchangesifnecessary,andalsoneededtohaveasolidstructure.Thus,themodularelementsweresituatedabovethestructure.Theseelementsincludedthefabricsensorandembellishments,whichactedasthetiestosecurethegarmentsontothebody.

Asbothartistanddesignertheaimwas,throughadeepengagementwiththematerials,tocreatesomething,throughhacking,whichwasvisuallyorganicratherthantechnological,somethingwhichmovedwiththemovementofthosewearingthem,andfinallysomethingwhichwasinherentlymodularandre-purposable,andwhichcould

Page 4: Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/ICLI_proceedings/2016/... · Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio1, Camille Baker2, Tara Baoth Mooney3,

potentiallymanifestassomethingelseinthefuture.Itwasthroughthedestructionoftheoriginalgarmentsthatareconstructionofnewgarmentstookplace.

ElectronicsDesignThewearablecomputingsystemconsistsofacollectionofcapacitivetouchsensorswornononeshoulderofeachdancerandamotorwitharibbonattachedplacedneartheneck.Thesensorsandactuatoroneachdancerarecontrolledbyawifi-enabledmicrocontroller1.EachofthecapacitivetouchsensorelectrodesareasingleconductivethreadsewntotheundersideofafabricpleatasseeninFigure2.Theelectrodesareconnectedtoacapacitivesensingchip2whichhandlesthecalibrationandmeasurementofthesignals.

Figure2.ImagefromarehearsalinSheffield,UKofthedancersinteractingwiththetextiletouchsensorsembeddedinthepinkpleatedfabric.

Theactuatorisasmallmotorwithanintegratedplanetarygearbox.Themotor’scircuitisconstructedfromconductivefabricmountedonapatchofblackleatherseeninFigure3.Afabricribbonisconnectedtothemotorsothatitrotatesandbrushesagainstthewearer’sneck,causingaticklingsensation.Forthisreason,theactuatorisreferredtoasa‘ticklemotor’.

Themicrocontrollersconnectedtothesensorsandactuatorspublishmessagestothenetworkwheneverasensorisactivatedbyatouch-byeitherthewearerortheotherdancer.Themicrocontrollersalsosubscribetoafeedtobenotifiedwhentheirmotorshouldbeturnedontorotatetheribbon.ThissystemofpassingaroundmessagesisimplementedusingtheMessageQueueingTelemetryTransport(MQTT)protocol.Aprogramcalledabroker3isrunonaserverconnectedtothesamelocalwifinetworkasthemicrocontrollers.Aseparateprogramthatactsasanotherclientofthebroker,listenstotheincomingsensormessagesandredirectsthemtothecorrespondingactuatorfeed.Thisprogramalsoactsasaportalforthechoreographertointerceptthesemessagesanddirectlysendherownmessagestotheactuators.

Soundsofreverberantchimeswithvariouspitchesaretriggeredwhenmessagesarereceived.Thesoundofthechimesistheentiretyoftheaudioaccompanyingtheperformance.Thesoundstriggeredaremappedtocorrespondinglinesofconductivestitchingintheshoulderpleats,givingthedancerssomecontroloverthesoundsmadeandthereforeanotherformofphysicalinputintheinteractiontoenablethecallandresponsedimension.

1ESP8266HUZZAHhttps://www.adafruit.com/products/24712MPR121BreakoutBoardhttps://www.sparkfun.com/products/96953Mosquittohttp://mosquitto.org/

Page 5: Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/ICLI_proceedings/2016/... · Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio1, Camille Baker2, Tara Baoth Mooney3,

Figure3.Leather-mountedtextilecircuitoftheticklemotorwornbyeachdancertoprovidehapticfeedback

ThisarrangementofsensorsreportingtoabrokerandactuatorsrespondingtothesamebrokerusingMQTTisanincreasinglystandardarchitecturefornetworkeddevicescommonlyreferredtoasthe‘InternetofThings’(Al-Fuqahaetat2015).However,insteadofmonitoringairqualityacrossacityorthecontentsofarefrigerator,ournetworkismonitoringtheactionsofdancerswithinaperformanceandprovidinganinvisibly-connectednetworkwithphysically-realisedendpoints.

DiscussionResearchersinrecentyearshavebeenexploringwearabletechnologiesfromthemobilehealthdimension,butasSusanElizabethRyanhasnotedinherrecentbookGarmentsofParadise(2014:8),fewareexploringthefullpotentialofwearabletechnologyinperformance,letalonetheotherrelatedissuesofidentityandbodydataownershipinperformance.Shewrites:

Wearablesinthecontextofperformancepresentopportunitiesforexploringourrelationshipswithourbodiesandhowwemovethem…[orhow]communicationsinterfaces,andothersoftandsensorytechnologiesallowustoexperienceortranscendourbodies,andhowtheconceptoftheatricalperformancecanbeexpandedinvirtualspace(2014:8)

Thiscollaborationaddressestheissues,challengesandproblemsofdevelopingmethodsofmakingandusinghandmadewearablesensingandactuationdevicestoaccessphysiologicaldataandcreateuniqueinteractiveperformances.Assuch,weseethisaswaytodrawinnewcommunities,especiallywithinperformance,intothedevelopment,evolutionof,andconversationaroundwearabletechnologyandetextilesproduction,thesustainablefashionissues,datacollectionethics,andinparticularhowtheseskin-basedtechnologiesmightenhanceperformancecreation,whilemakingthemplayfulandchallenging.

Futurepracticalexplorationsinclude:organisingmoreperformancesintheUKandtheUS,continuingtodevelopdifferentapproachestousingwearabletechandetextilesinperformancecontexts,aswellasmakingmorerobustcustomwearabletechgarments,embeddedwithbothspecialistsensorsandactuators,thatenabletheperformerstointervenewitheachother’sexpressionusingtheirbodydata.Theultimategoalisthatperformersengagewiththeirownandother’sbodycodetocreatenewformsof‘livedataperformance’,wheretheperformerisinitiatingtheinteractionusingthewearabledevicestoaidtheirinteraction.

Page 6: Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutterusers.sussex.ac.uk/~thm21/ICLI_proceedings/2016/... · Hacking the Body 2.0: Flutter/Stutter Kate Sicchio1, Camille Baker2, Tara Baoth Mooney3,

Theoveralllongtermdirectionofthisprojectistorefinemethodsofworkingwithperformers,toenablethemtocontrolhowtheyusethephysiologicaldatafromtheirbodyorthedatafromanotherperformertointeractandmove.Thiswillbedevelopedthroughfurtheriterationsofthedevicesandgarmentsworn,toenablethemtointeractandrespondtoeachotherandcreateanewmovement‘dialogue’.Inthisway,theperformersreclaimthedatacollectionbyusingthetechnologyasanothertooltothemhelpdevisemovementandco-createorchoreographperformanceworks,andeventuallywithchoreographer'srolechangingmoretothatofperformanceexperiencedesignerorartisticdirector,whiletheaudience'srolewillchangetopartperformer/partaudience/partchoreographer.Thiscircumventsandhopestoshinenewlightontheethicalissuesofwearabletechnologiesbyputtingthecontrolbackintothehandsoftheusers,inthiscase,theperformersandartisticdirector.Thisinturnismaybeconsideredacriticalactofmakingandconfrontationoftheissuesofsurveillanceanddatacontrol.

Acknowledgements.ThisworkwassupportedbyArtsCouncilEnglandGrantfortheArts.

ReferencesAl-Fuqaha,Ala,MohsenGuizani,MehdiMohammadi,MohammedAledhari,andMoussaAyyash.2015.Internetofthings:Asurveyonenablingtechnologies,protocols,andapplications.IEEECommunicationsSurveys&Tutorials17(4):2347-76.

Kozel,Susan(2008)Closer:Performance,Technologies,Phenomenology.CambridgeandLondon:MITPress.

Manning,Erin(2009)Relationscapes:Movement,Art,Philosophy.CambridgeandLondon:MITPress.

Ryan,SusanElizabeth(2014)GarmentsofParadise,CambridgeandLondon:MITPress,8.

Schiphorst,Thecla(2007),TheVarietiesofUserExperience:BridgingEmbodiedMethodologiesfromSomaticsandPerformancetoHumanComputerInteraction,PhDDissertation,SchoolofComputing,Plymouth,UnitedKingdom:CAiiAStarattheUniversityofPlymouth.