h2020 legal and financial issues katarina rohsmann · 2016. 10. 24. · katarina rohsmann, ffg...

BESTPRAC Training SchoolSeptember 27, 2016

Katarina Rohsmann, FFG

Legal and Financial Issues in H2020

OVERVIEW

ü Minimum requirements for participationü Funding instruments and funding ratesü Grant Agreement and Consortium Agreement

ü Working group 1: presentation of findings

ü The H2020 project cycle


ü The project budget


ü Cost categoriesü Eligibility of costs

1Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft | Sensengasse 1 | 1090 Wien | www.ffg.at

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICIPATION

Standard minimum conditions:• at least three legal entities• independent of each other• from different EU Member States

or Associated Countries (see http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/3cpart/h2020-hi-list-ac_en.pdf)

Coordination and Support Actions (CSA), ERC etc.: • at least one legal entity (check call text)

Additional criteria• may be specified in Work Programme (check call text)

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft | Sensengasse 1 | 1090 Wien | www.ffg.at 2

THIRD COUNTRY PARTICIPATION

• Partners from Third countries may participate

• Developing countries receive funding automatically

• Industrialised states, BRIC and Mexico only receive funding if…

- funding is provided for in a bilateral S&T agreement- the call for proposals clearly states eligibility- their participation is deemed essential for the action


1. Biotech Research Holding (Germany) – the coordinator

2. Biotech Research Corp. (Hungary): 100% ownedby Biotech Research Holding

3. BioForward Ltd. (UK)

4. Academy of Sciences (Serbia)

5. Moscow Center for Biological Research (Russia)

6. University of Bangladesh (Bangladesh)

• Does the consortium fulfil the minimum requirements? • Are all partners eligible for funding?• What if BioForward Ltd. goes bankrupt?


MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING: EXAMPLE


FUNDING INSTRUMENTS AND FUNDING RATES

Instrument Funding rate

Research and Innovation Action(RIA) 100%

Innovation Action (IA) 70% / 100%

Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) 100%

European Research Council (ERC) 100%

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) 100 %

Fast Track to Innovation 70% / 100%

• Innovation Actions, Fast track to innovation: 100% for ‚non-profit organisations‘

• The total costs (direct and indirect costs) are multiplied with the funding rate

THE GRANT AGREEMENT


derivedfrom theproposal

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/mga/gga/h2020-mga-gga-multi_en.pdf

Different versions exist for certain funding instruments (e.g. ERC, MSCA)

GUIDE TO UNDERSTAND THE RULES


http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf

THE CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT

Mandatory agreement between the Beneficiaries, covering e.g.- internal organisation of the consortium (governance structure, decision making…) – no “default rules”!- financial rules (e.g. distribution of pre-financing)- IPR arrangements (may deviate from GA “default rules”) - defaulting parties- settlement of internal disputes- confidentiality arrangements

• e.g. based on the DESCA model• should be signed before the start of the project • may not contradict the Grant Agreement (including its

annexes)Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft | Sensengasse 1 | 1090 Wien | www.ffg.at 8

THE PROJECT CYCLE


project budget, financial

information in the proposal

financial rulesin GA and CA

implementationof financial rules, periodic financial

reporting, payments, audits

final financialreporting, balance

payment, audits

PART A: BUDGET TABLE(FULL PROPOSAL)


only ifexplicitly

mentioned in call text

overheads: 25 % flat-rate, exceptsubcontracting

e.g. clinincalstudies

PART A: BUDGET TABLE(STAGE 1)


• Only the total requested amount for the action must be indicated• No major deviations allowed between stage 1 and 2

PART B: INFORMATION ON THE BUDGET


3.4 Resources to be committed Please provide the following:a table showing number of person/months required (table 3.4a)a table showing ‘other direct costs’ (table 3.4b) for participants where those costs exceed 15% of the personnel costs

------------------4.2: Third Parties involved in the actioninclude information on subcontractors, Linked Third Parties and third parties providing in-kind contributions (must be indicated in Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement in order to be eligible costs)

SUMMARY OF STAFF EFFORT(TABLE 3.4A)

Please indicate the number of person/months over the whole duration of the planned work, for each work package, for each participant. Identify the work-package leader for each WP by showing the relevant person-month figure in bold.


1 PM: 1/12 ofthe annualproductive

hours

SUMMARY OF STAFF EFFORTSTABLE 3.4a

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft | Sensengasse 1 | 1090 Wien | www.ffg.at

SUMMARY OF STAFF EFFORT(TABLE 3.4A)

Table 3.4b: ‘Other direct cost’ items (travel, equipment, other goods and services)Please complete the table below for each participant if the sum of the costs for’ travel’, ‘equipment’, and ‘goods and services’ exceeds 15% of the personnel costs for that participant.


OTHER DIRECT COSTSTABLE 3.4b

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft | Sensengasse 1 | 1090 Wien | www.ffg.at

ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR ACTUAL COSTS

ü Incurred by the beneficiary ü incurred during the duration of the action (except travel costs

for kick-off meeting and costs for final reporting)ü indicated in the estimated budget of the actionü identifiable and verifiableü necessary for the action as described in the GAü in compliance with national laws on taxes, labour and social

securityü in compliance with beneficiary's usual accounting practice

(may not contradict the rules of the Grant Agreement)ü reasonable, justified, sound financial management

N.B.: Non-refundable VAT is eligible


OVERVIEW ON PERSONNEL COSTS


CALCULATION OF PERSONNEL COSTS (YEARLY BASIS)


ANNUAL PRODUCTIVE HOURS

Option 1: „1720 fixed hours“: standard number which may be used by any beneficiary (pro-rata for part-time employees)

Option 2: „Individual annual productive hours“:calculation: ‘annual workable hours’ of the individual employee+ overhours – absences (sick leave etc. – not [bank] holidays)

Option 3: „Standard annual productive hours“calculated according to the usual accounting practicesmust correspond to at least 90 % of the ‚standard annual workable hours‘

No more hours than the „annual productive hours“ may be charged on all EU-funded projects per person and year


‚LAST CLOSED FINANCIAL YEAR‘


salary rises lead tofinancial losses

Only for calculation of personnel costs on a yearly basis: • If the financial year is not closed at the time of reporting,

the beneficiary must use the hourly rate of the last closed financial year available

• No adjustments!

CALCULATION OF PERSONNEL COSTS (MONTHLY BASIS)


‚STANDARD‘ AND ‚ADDITIONAL‘ REMUNERATION


PERSONNEL COSTS – DECISION TREE

See: Annotated Model Grant Agreement, p. 52


TYPES OF PERSONNEL COSTS

• A.1: Costs for employees (or equivalent)• A.2: Costs for natural persons working under a direct contract

(observe requirements – legally impossible in some countries)• A.3: Costs for personnel seconded by a third party against

payment • A.4: Costs of SME owners• A.5: Costs of ‘beneficiaries that are natural persons’

NOT personnel employed by a temporary work agency

Details: see Annotated Grant Agreement


TIME RECORDS

• Only the hours worked for the project must be recorded

• Exception: persons working exclusively on one project

• Time records are the proof that the personnel costs haveincurred - if the time recording system is not deemed to be‚reliable‘, all personnel costs may be rejected


Minimum requirements:

• title and number of the action• beneficiary’s full name• full name, date and signature of

the person working for the action• number of hours worked for the

action

• supervisor’s full name and signature

• reference to task or work package

SUBCONTRACTING

A purchase of goods, works or services that are identified in Annex 1 as action tasks• Tasks to be implemented and estimated costs must be set out in the proposal

• Based on ‘business conditions’: best value for money or lowest price

• Subcontracting to affiliates: only allowed if ‚usual provider‘ orframework contract

• No indirect costs on subcontracting


EXAMPLE: SUBCONTRACTING VS. OTHER DIRECT COSTS

Reply by the Research Enquiry Service:

“Another example might be the development of a prototype identified as an action task in Annex 1. Let's suppose that this prototype is composed of several elements among which there is a tailor-made stainless steel container and a new electronic device that needs to designed and fabricated to be integrated in the prototype. If these two elements are externalised, the tailor-made stainless steel container would be normally considered as a purchase of goods needed for the action task (developing the prototype). In contrast, designing and fabricating the new electronic device would be considered as subcontracting as it is part of the action task (developing the prototype).”


OTHER DIRECT COSTS (1)

Travel costs and related subsistence allowance: • must be necessary for the action and• in line with the beneficiary‘s usual practises on travel

Equipment, infrastructures and other assets:• only the depreciation costs are eligible• only the part of the equipment‘s „full capacity“

used for the project can be charged (must be recorded)• rent/lease eligible if not exceeding depreciation costs


OTHER DIRECT COSTS (2)

Costs of other goods and services: • the beneficiary carries out a task itsself and is supported

by third party (unlike subcontracting)• best value for money or lowest price

• e.g. consumables and supplies, dissemination costs, rent for meeting rooms, IRP-related costs, certificates on the financial statements


OTHER DIRECT COSTS: EXAMPLE 1


Research Enquiry Service on the calculation of machine hours:

• Annual depreciation of the equipment is 17 200 €• Under normal circumstances the equipment can be used

1720 hours per year• However the equipment is actually used only 100 hours

per year• Out of which for the EU action was used (according to the

records) 50 hours• The amount chargeable to the EU action in the year

would be: 17 200 € / 1720 usable hours = 10 € per hour * 50 hours of use for the action = 500 €

OTHER DIRECT COSTS: EXAMPLE 2


A project manager seeks external support to set up the projectwebsite (estimated cost: 5.000 EUR). According to the internal policies, three offers are required for each order of over 500 EUR. The project manager thinks: „I have had very good experienceswith ABC websites, I definitely want to commission them again. It‘s a loss of time to request more offers“.

INTERNALLY INVOICED COSTS

• Definition: use of certain resources (e.g. ‘core facilities’) is shared between different units of the same organisation, costs of their use are declared through internal invoices

• Costs must be declared under the corresponding budgetcategory

• Use and usage (number of hours) for the project must bementioned on the invoice

• Global amounts (all-in average costs) are not eligibe

• Costs must be actual – no average costs

• Price must not include overheads or profit

31Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft | Sensengasse 1 | 1090 Wien | www.ffg.at

COSTS OF LINKED THIRD PARTIES

• Only affiliates and organisations with a legal link to the beneficiary can be a Linked Third Party

• Legal relationship: broad, not specifically created for grant

• Linked Third Parties carry out work in the project and report their own costs

• Rules regarding eligibility of costs, funding rates and third country participation apply

• Name and tasks of the Linked Third Party must be indicated in the proposal


LINKED THIRD PARTIES: EXAMPLE

The Start-Up Centre for Applied Technologies (founded in 1992) in L is jointly owned by the Municipality of L and the University of L (50% each). The partnership agreement of the two ownersspecifies the business purpose as following: „…support thetransition of research projects of the University into businesses, exploit the University‘s research results…“


coor

dina

tor

dist

ribut

esfu

ndin

g

REPORTING AND PAYMENTS


Reports must be submitted within 60 days after the end of the RP:

periodic technical report + periodic financial report:- Individual financial statements- Summary financial statement

FINANCIAL REPORTING IN THE PARTICIPANT PORTAL


Click tocomplete‚use ofresources‘/ to add details

Other directcosts onlyneed to beexplained ifthey exceed15% of thepersonnelcosts

CERTIFICATE ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CFS)

• Required at the end of the project if funding per partner (or Linked Third Party) exceeds 325.000 EUR (only actual costs and ‚average personnel costs‘)

• may be performed by any qualified auditor

• costs are eligible as other direct costs• template/further info: Annex 5 of the Grant Agreement


1ST LEVEL VS. 2ND LEVEL AUDIT


1st. level audit (CFS) 2nd. level audit (EU audit)When at the end of the project up to 2 years after balance paymentWhy funding exceeds 325.000 € (actual

costs + average personnel costs)selection by EC (risk-based auditstrategy, focus on fraud prevention)

Who isaudited

Beneficiaries and Linked Third Parties

Beneficiaries and all types of Third Parties (subcontractors etc.)

…andbywhom

Qualified, independent auditor orindependent Public Officer

DG RTI‘s Common Audit Service or auditfirm appointed by DG RTI

How Terms of reference and Agreed-upon procedures (Annex 5 GA)

According to audit programme definedby DG RTD (more comprehensive thanCFS; focus on financial implementationbut may include technical/other aspects)

Conse-quences

• Rejection of costs, reduction of the grant, recovery, suspension of payments, suspension/termination of the project

• In very serious cases: penalties, criminal persecution• in case of systematic/recurrent errors: extension of findings

2ND. LEVEL AUDIT: PROCEDURE

• Initial contact with responsible auditors to agree on dates and logistics for audit visit

• Formal “Letter of announcement” of audit including detailed annex with information and documents to be provided prior and during audit visit

• On-site examination (~ 4-5 days): opening meeting, checks/analysis, closing meeting

• Assessment after on-site visit• Draft audit report• Contradictory audit procedure (30 days for comments)• Final audit report• EC decides about possible consequences


SOME TIPPS FOR AUDITS

• (Try to) avoid errors in the first place!Read guidance documents, ask for advice…

• Prepare wellhave all necessary documents at hand and in order, all relevant persons are present, dedicated room for the audit…

• Be proactive and provide explainations as soon aspossible (don‘t wait for the audit report)


AUDITS: FP7 VS. H2020


FP7 H2020

1st. level audits

Whenever the 375.000 € thresholdwas reached

Only at the end of the project

Threshold: 375.000 € Threshold: 325.000 € (actual costs +average personnel costs)

2nd. level auditsUp to 5 years after end of project Up to 2 years after balance payment

No contradictory process 90 days contradictory procedure

Communication via the coordinator Commission may contactbeneficiaries directly

H2020 MOST COMMON ERRORS EXPECTED (ACCORDING TO EC)


WHEN IN DOUBT…

Have a look at the H2020 Online Manual: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/index_en.htm

Look for information in the Annotated Grant Agreement: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf

Ask your legal and financial NCP: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/national_contact_points.html

Contact the Research Enquiry Service: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/research_enquiry_service.html


THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Katarina RohsmannExpert for legal and financial issues

in the EU framework programme

Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)Sensengasse 1, 1090 Vienna, Austria

phone: +43/5/7755-4009email: [email protected]


h2020 legal and financial issues katarina rohsmann · 2016. 10. 24. · katarina rohsmann, ffg...

Documents