g.w. carver collegiate academy 2015 charter extension ... · g.w. carver collegiate academy is a...
TRANSCRIPT
G.W. Carver Collegiate Academy 2015 Charter Extension Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
G.W. Carver Collegiate Academy is a Type 5 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 305 9th-11th grade students in the Recovery School District in 2014-15. The school opened in 2012 as a new school with a Pre-Assessment Index of 53.4. For the 2014-15 school year, the school received an Assessment Index of 73.6 for EOC. G.W. Carver Collegiate Academy‘s current School Performance Score (SPS) of 73.6 will likely be above the average SPS for all schools in in the Recovery School District and below the average SPS for schools in the state.
Overview of Performance
2015 School Performance Score 73.6
2015 Letter Grade C
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
G.W. Carver Collegiate Academy Collegiate Academies 9th-11th 382002 5
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends extension for a term of one year.
G.W. Carver Collegiate AcademyCMO: Collegiate Academies
Non-Profit: G.W. Carver Collegiate Academy
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2012 Renewal: 2016 Grade Configuration: 9th-11th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: 73.6 Financial Performance Score: 85 Organizational Performance Score: 92
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
C
Assessment Index TBD N/A 73.6 Percentage of Students with Disabilities 15.4%
SPS Progress Points Awarded 0 Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) TBD Students Dropping Out 0.0%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
73.6
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) N/A Students Performing Proficient in ELA 19%
Graduation Index (HS) N/A Students Performing Proficient in Math 29%
ACT Average (HS) N/A
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 17.2%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit
with No Recurring or Material Findings
15 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.14*◊ 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
85
Timely ReportingAll reports submitted
timely20 20
Total 85 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 12 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
92
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 92 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 5 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement Detail
i. School follows all components of the OneApp process including appropriate child welfare and truancy policies.
4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 0 4 62.2% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 0 4 4.3% 2.2%
Total 12 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20
G.W. Carver Preparatory Academy 2015 Charter Extension Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
G.W. Carver Preparatory Academy is a Type 5 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 287 9th-11th grade students in the Recovery School District in 2014-15. The school opened in 2012 as a new school with a Pre-Assessment Index of 46.2. For the 2014-15 school year, the school received an Assessment Index of 59.1 for EOC. Carver Preparatory Academy‘s current School Performance Score (SPS) of 59.1 is below the average SPS for schools in the Recovery School District and below the average SPS for schools in the state.
Overview of Performance
2015 School Performance Score 59.1
2015 Letter Grade D
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
G.W. Carver Preparatory Academy Collegiate Academies 9th-11th 382003 5
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends extension for a term of one year.
G.W. Carver Preparatory AcademyCMO: Collegiate Academies
Non-Profit: G.W. Carver Preparatory Academy
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2012 Renewal: 2016 Grade Configuration: 9th-11th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: 59.1 Financial Performance Score: 85 Organizational Performance Score: 92
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
D
Assessment Index TBD N/A 59.1 Percentage of Students with Disabilities 15.7%
SPS Progress Points Awarded 0 Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) TBD Students Dropping Out 6.1%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
59.1
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) N/A Students Performing Proficient in ELA 21%
Graduation Index (HS) N/A Students Performing Proficient in Math 8%
ACT Average (HS) N/A
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 17.2%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit
with No Recurring or Material Findings
15 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.14*◊ 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
85
Timely ReportingAll reports submitted
timely20 20
Total 85 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 12 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
92
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 92 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 5 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement Detail
i. School follows all components of the OneApp process including appropriate child welfare and truancy policies.
4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 0 4 61.8% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 0 4 2.4% 2.2%
Total 12 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20
The NET Charter School 2015 Charter Extension Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
The NET Charter School is a Type 5 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 164 9th-12th grade students in the Recovery School District in 2014-15. The school opened in 2012 as an alternative high school with a Pre-Assessment Index of 14. As an alternative high school, the charter extension for The NET is based on an alternative accountability rubric developed by the Louisiana Department of Education and approved by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Overview of Performance
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
The NET Charter School Educators for Quality Alternatives 9th-12th 360001 5
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends extension for a term of one year.
The NET Charter High School
Alternative Charter High School Extension Framework
Indicators Standard Potential Points Performance Metric Actual Score Total
Department Selected
Indicators
EOC / LAA1 Performance
Full Credit – 20 Points > 75% of Students Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
51.90% 0 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points 61 – 74% of Students Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% of Student Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
Credit Accumulation2
Full Credit – 20 Points > 75 % of Students Earn their Credit Target
65.41% 10 / 20 Partial Credit – 10 Points 61 – 74% of Students Earn their Credit Target
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% of Students Earn their Credit Target
Student Stability Rate3
Full Credit – 20 Points > 85% of Students Stay Enrolled in School
57.64% 0 / 20 Partial Credit – 10 Points 61 – 84% of Students Stay Enrolled in School
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% Students Stay Enrolled in School
The NET Selected
Indicators
Graduation Completion4
Full Credit – 20 Points > 70% Graduation Completion
85.29% 20 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points 55% - 69.9% Graduation Completion
No Credit – 0 Points < 55% Graduation Completion
Growth in STAR Enterprise Reading
and Math Assessments5
Full Credit – 20 Points
Average rate of 2 years of growth in Math and Reading OR Average rate of 2 years growth in either Math or Reading and a minimum of 1 year growth in the other subject 2.0 (Math)
1.0 (Reading) 20 / 20
Partial Credit - 10 Points Average rate of at least 1 year growth in Math and Reading
No Credit – 0 Points Average rate of less than 1 year growth in Math and Reading
Total Points Accumulated 50 / 100 Framework Extension Eligibility
Total Points Accumulated Base Extension Term 81 – 100 Eligible 50 – 80 Eligible 0 – 49 Ineligible for Traditional Extension
1 Measured by the percent of students enrolled for at least 45 days before the opening of the testing window that achieve a score of Fair, Good, or Excellent on each End-of-Course examination taken. 2 Measured by the percent of students enrolled for 45 days or more who meet their credit target (3 credits per semester). Students are considered for inclusion in the data each semester if they enter the school by a certain date and complete the semester. Specifically, students who enter on or before October 1st and continue through January 1st are expected to complete 3 credits to earn their credit target. Students who enter on or before February 1st and continue through June 1st are expected to complete 3 credits to earn their credit targets. Students who would count for both semesters will be expected to earn 6 credits for the academic year. 3 Measured by the percent of students enrolled 45 days or more from any starting point in the school year who either graduated with a diploma, received a certificate of achievement, or who remained enrolled in high school. Excluded from the calculation are students with other exit codes that indicate a legitimate reason for exiting school, such as moving to another state. 4 Measured by the percent of students enrolled 45 days or more who graduated with a diploma or achieved a certificate of achievement divided by the total number of students who began the school year with sufficient credits to be considered eligible for graduation within that school year. 5 Measured by the average rate of growth on the STAR Enterprise Reading and Math benchmark assessments for all students enrolled at the school for which both a formative and summative assessment were taken.
The NET Charter School (Alternative)CMO: Educators for Quality Alternatives
Non-Profit: The NET Charter School
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2012 Renewal: 2016 Grade Configuration: 9th-12th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: 25.7 Financial Performance Score: 100 Organizational Performance Score: 92
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
F
Assessment Index N/A 11.9 19.3 Percentage of Students with Disabilities 23.2%
SPS Progress Points Awarded 0 Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) TBD Students Dropping Out 21.6%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
25.7
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) 27.3 Students Performing Proficient in ELA <5%
Graduation Index (HS) 39.5 Students Performing Proficient in Math <5%
ACT Average (HS) 11.2
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 45.8%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit with No Findings
30 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.04* 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
100
Timely ReportingAll reports submitted
timely20 20
Total 100 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 12 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
92
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 92 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 5 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement Detail
i. School follows all components of the OneApp process including appropriate child welfare and truancy policies.
4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 0 4 71.1% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 0 4 2.4% 2.2%
Total 12 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20
Crescent Leadership Academy 2015 Charter Extension Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
Crescent Leadership Academy is a Type 5 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 162 7th-12th grade students in the Recovery School District in 2014-15. The school opened in 2012 as an alternative school. As an alternative school, the charter extension for Crescent Leadership Academy is based on an alternative accountability rubric developed by the Louisiana Department of Education and approved by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Overview of Performance
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
Crescent Leadership Academy Crescent Leadership Academy 7th-12th 361001 5
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends extension for a term of one year.
Crescent Leadership Academy 2014-15
Alternative Charter High School Extension Framework
Indicators Standard Potential Points Performance Metric Actual Score Total
Department Selected
Indicators
EOC / LAA Performance1
Full Credit – 20 Points > 75% of Students Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
31.10% 0 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points 61 – 74% of Students Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% of Student Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
Credit Accumulation2
Full Credit – 20 Points > 75 % of Students Earn their Credit Target
57.25% 0 / 20 Partial Credit – 10 Points 61 – 74% of Students Earn their Credit Target
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% of Students Earn their Credit Target
Student Stability Rate3
Full Credit – 20 Points > 85% of Students Stay Enrolled in School
84.23% 10 / 20 Partial Credit – 10 Points 61 – 84% of Students Stay Enrolled in School
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% Students Stay Enrolled in School
CLA Selected Indicators
Graduation Completion4
Full Credit – 20 Points > 70% Graduation Completion
100.00% 20 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points 55% - 69.9% Graduation Completion
No Credit – 0 Points < 55% Graduation Completion
Growth in STAR Enterprise Reading
and Math Assessments5
Full Credit – 20 Points
Average rate of 2 years of growth in Math and Reading OR Average rate of 2 years growth in either Math or Reading and a minimum of 1 year growth in the other subject 2.1 (ELA)
1.5 (Math) 20 / 20
Partial Credit - 10 Points Average rate of at least 1 year growth in Math and Reading
No Credit – 0 Points Average rate of less than 1 year growth in Math and Reading
Total Points Accumulated 50 / 100 Framework Extension Eligibility
Total Points Accumulated Base Extension Term 81 – 100 Eligible 50 – 80 Eligible 0 – 49 Ineligible for Traditional Extension
1 Measured by the percent of students enrolled for at least 45 days before the opening of the testing window that achieve a score of Fair, Good, or Excellent on each End-of-Course examination taken. 2 Measured by the percent of students enrolled for 45 days or more who meet their credit target (3 credits per semester). Students are considered for inclusion in the data each semester if they enter the school by a certain date and complete the semester. Specifically, students who enter on or before October 1st and continue through January 1st are expected to complete 3 credits to earn their credit target. Students who enter on or before February 1st and continue through June 1st are expected to complete 3 credits to earn their credit targets. Students who would count for both semesters will be expected to earn 6 credits for the academic year. 3 Measured by the percent of students enrolled 45 days or more from any starting point in the school year who either graduated with a diploma, received a certificate of achievement, or who remained enrolled in high school. Excluded from the calculation are students with other exit codes that indicate a legitimate reason for exiting school, such as moving to another state. 4 Measured by the percent of students enrolled 45 days or more who graduated with a diploma or achieved a certificate of achievement divided by the total number of students who began the school year with sufficient credits to be considered eligible for graduation within that school year. 5 Measured by the average rate of growth on the STAR Enterprise Reading and Math benchmark assessments for all students enrolled at the school for which both a formative and summative assessment were taken.
Crescent Leadership Academy (Alternative)CMO: Crescent Leadership Academy
Non-Profit: Crescent Leadership Academy
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2012 Extension: 2016 Grade Configuration: 7th-12th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: TBD Financial Performance Score: 90 Organizational Performance Score: 92
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
TBD
Assessment Index TBD TBD TBD Percentage of Students with Disabilities 17.3%
SPS Progress Points Awarded TBD Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) TBD Students Dropping Out 31.3%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
TBD
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) TBD Students Performing Proficient in ELA NR
Graduation Index (HS) TBD Students Performing Proficient in Math 7%
ACT Average (HS) TBD
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 25.9%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit with No Findings
30 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.23* 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
90
Timely Reporting2 reports submitted
late10 20
Total 90 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 12 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
92
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 92 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 5 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement Detail
i. School follows all components of the OneApp process including appropriate child welfare and truancy policies.
4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 0 4 49.6% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 0 4 16.0% 2.2%
Total 12 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20
New Orleans Military/Maritime Academy 2015 Charter Renewal Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
New Orleans Military/Maritime Academy is a Type 2 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 540 9th-12th grade students in Orleans Parish in 2014-15. The school opened in 2011 as a new school with a Pre-Assessment Index of 75.8. For the 2014-15 school year, the school received an Assessment Index of 96.7 for ACT, and 89.7 for EOC. New Orleans Military/Maritime Academy‘s current School Performance Score (SPS) of 103.2 is above the average SPS for schools in Orleans Parish and above the average SPS for schools in the state.
Overview of Performance
2015 School Performance Score 103.2
2015 Letter Grade A
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
New Orleans Military/Maritime Academy
New Orleans Military and Maritime Academy, Inc.
9th-12th 348001 2
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends renewal for a term of 10 years.
New Orleans Military/Maritime AcademyNon-Profit: New Orleans Military/Maritime Academy
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2011 Renewal: 2015 Grade Configuration: 9th-12th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: 103.2 Financial Performance Score: 95 Organizational Performance Score: 96
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
A
Assessment Index N/A 96.7 89.7 Percentage of Students with Disabilities 4.8%
SPS Progress Points Awarded 10 Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) N/A Students Dropping Out 0.0%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
103.2
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) N/A Students Performing Proficient in ELA NR
Graduation Index (HS) N/A Students Performing Proficient in Math NR
ACT Average (HS) 21.0
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 42.6%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit with No Findings
30 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.87* 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
95
Timely Reporting1 report submitted
late15 20
Total 95 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 16 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
96
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 96 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 2 AND 4 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement
i. Student Enrollment and At-Risk Percentage 0 4 66.0% 66.2%
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 4 4 85.2% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 4 4 2.8% 4.3%
Total 16 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20
Joseph Clark High School 2015 Charter Renewal Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
Joseph Clark High School is a Type 5 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 427 9th-12th grade students in the Recovery School District in 2014-15. The school opened in 2011 as a turnaround with a Pre-Assessment Index of 36.9. For the 2014-15 school year, the school received an Assessment Index of 25.9 for ACT, and 29.5 for EOC. Joseph Clark High School‘s current School Performance Score (SPS) of 62.4 is below the average SPS for schools in the Recovery School District and below the average SPS for schools in the state.
Overview of Performance
2015 School Performance Score 62.4
2015 Letter Grade D
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
Joseph Clark High School FirstLine Schools, Inc. 9th-12th 399003 5
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends renewal for a term of three years.
Joseph S. Clark Preparatory High SchoolCMO: FirstLine Schools, Inc.
Non-Profit: Joseph S. Clark Preparatory High School
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2011 Renewal: 2015 Grade Configuration: 9th-12th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: 62.4 Financial Performance Score: 95 Organizational Performance Score: 100
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
D
Assessment Index N/A 25.9 29.5 Percentage of Students with Disabilities 22.0%
SPS Progress Points Awarded 8.4 Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) TBD Students Dropping Out 26.1%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
62.4
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) 68.6 Students Performing Proficient in ELA 6%
Graduation Index (HS) 73.4 Students Performing Proficient in Math <5%
ACT Average (HS) 15.1
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 10.0%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit with No Findings
30 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.41* 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
95
Timely Reporting1 report submitted
late15 20
Total 95 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 20 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
100
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 100 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 5 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement Detail
i. School follows all components of the OneApp process including appropriate child welfare and truancy policies.
4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 4 4 80.0% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 4 4 1.6% 2.2%
Total 20 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20
ReNEW Accelerated High School (2/West Bank) 2015 Charter Renewal Recommendation Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In developing this report, the Department of Education conducted a performance review to verify reported performance against criteria outlined in BESE Bulletin 126. The performance review included a site visit, interviews with the school leadership team, interviews with the charter board, and an analysis of academic, financial, legal and contractual data.
ReNEW Accelerated High School (2/West Bank) is a Type 5 Charter School located in New Orleans that served approximately 342 9th-12th grade students in the Recovery School District in 2014-15. The school opened in 2011 as an alternative high school with a Pre-Assessment Index of 18.8. As an alternative high school, the charter renewal for ReNEW Accelerated High School (2/West Bank) is based on an alternative accountability rubric developed by the Louisiana Department of Education and approved by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Overview of Performance
Organizational Performance Rating Meets Expectations
Financial Performance Rating Meets Expectations
School Name Non-Profit Organization Grades Served Site Code Type
ReNEW Accelerated High School (2/West Bank) ReNEW Schools 9th - 12th 369005 5
Recommendation and Term
Based upon the findings shared in this report and the attached Annual Review, the Department of Education recommends renewal for a term of three years.
ReNEW Accelerated High School
Alternative Charter High School Renewal Framework
Indicators Standard Potential Points Performance Metric Actual Score Total
Department Selected
Indicators
EOC / LAA1 Performance
Full Credit – 20 Points > 75% of Students Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
54.60% 0 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points 61 – 74% of Students Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% of Student Receive Score Eligible for Graduation
Credit Accumulation2
Full Credit – 20 Points > 75 % of Students Earn their Credit Target
3.21% 0 / 20 Partial Credit – 10 Points 61 – 74% of Students Earn their Credit Target
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% of Students Earn their Credit Target
Student Stability Rate3
Full Credit – 20 Points > 85% of Students Stay Enrolled in School
89.70% 20 / 20 Partial Credit – 10 Points 61 – 84% of Students Stay Enrolled in School
No Credit – 0 Points < 60% Students Stay Enrolled in School
ReNEW Selected
Indicators
Skill-Growth Testing Data (MAP/NWEA)4
Full Credit – 20 Points Average of > 1.5 years of growth per student
1.87 20 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points Average of 1 – 1.4 years of growth average per student
No Credit – 0 Points Average < 1 year of growth average per student
Year over Year Growth on ACT5
Full Credit – 20 Points > 1.5 Average points or higher of growth in school’s ACT average
2.53 20 / 20 Partial Credit - 10 Points 1.0 – 1.49 Average points of growth in
school’s ACT average
No Credit – 0 Points < 1.0 Average points of growth in school’s ACT average
Total Points Accumulated 60 / 100 Framework Renewal and Term Length Eligibility
Total Points Accumulated Base Renewal Term Additional Years 81 – 100 3 Year Renewal Term Up to two additional years for financial and organizational performance 50 – 80 3 Year Renewal Term Not eligible to earn additional years 0 – 49 Ineligible for Renewal N/A
1 Measured by the percent of students enrolled for at least 45 days before the opening of the testing window that achieve a score of Fair, Good, or Excellent on each End-of-Course examination taken. 2 Measured by the percent of students enrolled for 45 days or more who meet their credit target (3 credits per semester). Students are considered for inclusion in the data each semester if they enter the school by a certain date and complete the semester. Specifically, students who enter on or before October 1st and continue through January 1st are expected to complete 3 credits to earn their credit target. Students who enter on or before February 1st and continue through June 1st are expected to complete 3 credits to earn their credit targets. Students who would count for both semesters will be expected to earn 6 credits for the academic year. 3 Measured by the percent of students enrolled 45 days or more from any starting point in the school year who either graduated with a diploma, received a certificate of achievement, or who remained enrolled in high school. Excluded from the calculation are students with other exit codes that indicate a legitimate reason for exiting school, such as moving to another state. 4 Measured by the average rate of growth on the MAP/NWEA Reading and Math benchmark assessments for all students enrolled at the school for which both a diagnostic and summative assessment were taken. 5 Measured by the highest ACT score for any student enrolled 45 days or more who took the ACT at any point in the 2014-15 school year.
ReNEW Accelerated High School--West Bank (Alternative)CMO: ReNEW Schools
Non-Profit: ReNEW Accelerated High School
2014-2015CHARTER SCHOOLANNUAL REVIEW
Year Opened: 2011 Renewal: 2015 Grade Configuration: 9th - 12th
OVERVIEWAcademic Performance Score: 18.9 Financial Performance Score: 100 Organizational Performance Score: 96
DETAILED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
SPS Indicators 3-8 ACT EOC Special Education Indicators
LETTER GRADE
F
Assessment Index TBD 2.6 9.3 Percentage of Students with Disabilities 18.9%
SPS Progress Points Awarded 0 Students Graduating with HS Diploma N/A
Dropout Index (8th grade) TBD Students Dropping Out 0.0%
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS)
18.9
Cohort Graduation Rate (HS) 26.6 Students Performing Proficient in ELA NR
Graduation Index (HS) 32.8 Students Performing Proficient in Math NR
ACT Average (HS) 7.2
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Indicators School Data Points Earned Points Possible
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Fund Balance 13.3%* 30 30
Audit FindingsUnqualified Audit with No Findings
30 30
Debt to Assets Ratio 0.27*◊ 20 20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
100
Timely ReportingAll reports submitted
timely20 20
Total 100 100
*2013-2014 audit data | ◊CMO-level financial data used
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Key Indicators Points Earned Points Possible
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING
Meets Expectations
Enrollment 16 20
Facilities 12 12
Discipline 8 8
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE
96
Special Education 28 28
Health and Safety 12 12
Governance 20 20
Total 96 100
Page 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORE INDICATORS
A. ENROLLMENT (TYPE 5 SCHOOLS)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible School Data Requirement Detail
i. School follows all components of the OneApp process including appropriate child welfare and truancy policies.
4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Follows Recruitment and Enrollment Plan, Lottery 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Attendance Laws, Truancy Policy, and Timely Transfer of Records
4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Re-Enrolls High Percentage of Students 0 4 61.9% 75.0%
v. School Retains Students During the School Year 4 4 1.8% 2.2%
Total 16 20
B. FACILITIES (OBSERVED DURING FACILITIES REVIEW)Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Meets Local and State Fire and Life Safety Codes 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Meets Public Health Sanitary Codes 4 4 Full Credit
iii. ADA Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
C. DISCIPLINEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Adheres to BESE Model Master Discipline Plan 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Suspensions and Expulsions are Handled Properly 4 4 Full Credit
Total 8 8
D. SPECIAL EDUCATION, 504 ACCOMMODATIONS, & OTHER AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS (Observed During Visit or Student Programs Monitoring)
Indicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Enrollment and Retention 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Schools Identify At-Risk Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Conducts Evaluations 4 4 Full Credit
iv. School Writes Required IEPs 4 4 Full Credit
v. School Provides Programming and Placement 4 4 Full Credit
vi. School Follows Discipline Procedures 4 4 Full Credit
vii. Assessments 4 4 Full Credit
Total 28 28
E. HEALTH & SAFETYIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. School Conducts Background Checks on All Employees 4 4 Full Credit
ii. School Provides Health Services to Students 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School Follows Bus Safety Protocols 4 4 Full Credit
Total 12 12
F. GOVERNANCEIndicators Points Earned Points Possible Detail
i. Board Structure Meets Bulletin 126 Requirements 4 4 Full Credit
ii. Board Adheres to Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics 4 4 Full Credit
iii. School and Board Adhere to Louisiana Open Meetings Laws 4 4 Full Credit
iv. Board Adheres to Public Records Act 4 4 Full Credit
v. Board Follows Public Bid Laws 4 4 Full Credit
Total 20 20