gupta rajulu evaru

*35 o - OO

7T* O

^30=13^6

a 1950

100L

2.

8.

a a

* e

6 T^b 5?o5b3i>5b o5o*)c3 o^So 2AO ' ' W7.

-3#o#tfv-%t$ ... 30

O .UK 1 ^^r ^ fl ^ ^^ ^Jo^^^ v^9. oXj^cfibaex) ... 88' ~*^L^ W V ^rfUr

"1 fle \ x* cy** x

r*x ^x **s

11.~*

12.

13. IPax) S)e5^oS>3O3. . 53^ V ^ ^^

55a o

3-0-0^v' O.

9

(Historical

-CSB/Sfcfc

LJ

O

oo

195, 58, 85,05Q

O

i ll

^. ^ ^ ^ ., .< *^..^ _ ft ^^..^^

(1 Î o I cu o.V^/ ^ CV. - Qd3oO(vP>> So. ~g") "^T3uro

oL^

(2)

^^*- esSeS^9 e&o

eo 9

Neoo

r oiio

"^ôôe)^b

(? o.

eo

c8l 155bauQ &

^ e;fSurgeon")\ ^ y

(Surgery^

KSjKRrtX^ak tf/^H\?\^ *t?

s

f

OO

esoj^ao

aCO

14-11-1950. Lecturer, S, E. E. & C V. E. College,as cSb

a 43,,

o^So 25ô^2Jôô^D^)^^^) -{5?Jrfb

oe

\

oTV>^ "^9-tf8/

/

\

/

'

\Soooo KB oOTLJ

~

e)o)

rf "S'S^^fiib.

ê-tfd&^Tv^ S-S-

oc

^5SDOô^^?j

sSj-rftfS S

vi

^tf*yn$ewr8S;58fc>B3 rsr'&ti "The dynasties of the kaliAge" e

Qcp

8068, 3044

Vlll

3fctfcJ-tfOT$8(j$5Sx>3rtfpS)&

oi

e^o/S

cX5bo

"3 c /0_ L Q

/?Co$sSx>wS)o8'i& loT-cSfe "S

otfotfoSitfej

>Kb

o

3950

x

CO

CO

ro

C?

2CO

o

77-56 a 25-5-50ll

o

9^ ?6oo3^355o3 -

TT'OZT

.

2^200

'^8&.

25-5-50

oo

e

5-6-50.

Qo

7^8

c\X)"0\

o

bo^

z)

. Kb-u>[g'o5Soex>

-^> ^ o_

80-3-50

198 -n

7vj5TT=SSb. (wS"LJ

,

21e 16

305

c4.ro

471, 472, 698

5

eo

ro ol

13

fib So-tfgsS

'

o

'

cxxr*

c)

Acr-Stf

Kb

CO

ro

O

b

8

CO

^

Oil

H ~> IS

II 3 IS

Sjg$ro '"

II oo il

e

il oO |,

s-

'

8 >,

\*

23

y

2. S^slSoSfcr-S'S' 3.e/ FS

Kb

(38)

ra

ag or'^SoSJcSSb

" TT !

0^55- ^r*^^ SSJ

V"

^-880

. 0. Oc

-u)

w

o

o

o 8 6

nro

I&JI

11211

llcrll- V

"u

o ^

(19S4-35140

co

9ooo So

^)So

o

oe!)

cxxr*

^c^bo

o5i ST^"Sl^Sb. |J, ^p. 322

\Ko$ X ocxr^

9 ^ G-. n L_ \lJ ' L -A '00 V~

9 ~ 6 _ 50

O T^ y> a 5-6-50tfo-Qr Sfcr'itfo o3>

"W

co

140

jcp qo:>03SN "W g% oood&b ~3TT ^ 2j6"^>00

c*

x . ^ C foocr

!

*'

: iJ

v.

Cc

27.6-50^

eo

9-6-50

STT"

9^9-6-50V

2. "3

22-6-50

3.

21255

V

cooo"!

4V

o

Qo^ 00 23

-tfoi&te

o

g'o

90

v

-u

27-6-50

15

o

eo

12-7.50

XJ 00

o

F3

2052l

oo

"3

. 1950

g'o 1967 tfoll tfo ^rS^PSS^^^o 1832 tfoll

1910 tfoll tfo) ^021*000^

i ^ 1882 KJoll

20

o1

C? eo

(22)ot3ro Tjrpi^S's^ (23)

(24)

95

-

5? VfW .V^Wl^ wuuWoJ-Q 'QoJoJ*?^ II (29)

"

(26)

(27)

1J

CJ

26CO

o

>,

oJ

wtl

LJ,59 9

00

ro

fib

S^D-S) \cS5boow,

V__

I

C

. fib ^LJ oO

O

CO

a;xro

o e

ou

9

(

"fib S5

a^S"J

x$ 7^8^

9236)

e>^ 50 rdvjQej^ \Q )

*LJ

. 9-~i * i

~ 11o

657-661

co

O

e ^'

o

o

. OOOO^S

$8o-O tf a^i5e>D?Ce)2X>.

A".9-498-500)

oxo 3 Ib

OO

eo

Cp

2007V3

5

cXX)O t o3?,VCT>

C?

7^55*5 ^7^

9

-o 13

-tfQ \o-ft 5,

-rw

ex fib

9

o

n b

-3

^c o

tf'

LJ

\LJ

on

CO

oocr

28

P

5Sb tf SO SD o

b'o3

(1) So^88; (2) e^^as^ro; (3) ^>rfs (4)^j v.*

(Brahmin)

dCb^So. ^'i=-0.\

o oe

fS^cSo

24

ot>a ) oo

60

o ^6"\LJ

CO

(

-O

8 o -0no 'o5 5 ?3*

o

9

tf-Qo-Q

LJ F3 W tJ

8

p-Cfo \c5fiO

eo -i X

wrfb

"S

4."

5.

C?sr#vb

12

6. 948-949

7,

8.

ro

o

cO

950-9^8 S

G o

fib ^TT9^ 135SC&

;/>o :;cyV)

/

oC;

o ^5 r* Q S

o y"

c35ooi 5Scr ^ 5X0 tw

"""

8 3 la

ooo -0555 Sox^fOcJSoooSQ. ^DOO 3 too

a"t) ^''

C)

27

r~t-

28 rtb

eo

15

3-2,3^0^0

\-u3

1950 Soil"/No

"S

ocp

o ic e;

so

oJ

co

u)

1T

C?

~e3;55b

XOTV oWCo-tf I -tr~$Q 0X^0 tfz?* f

CO O^PTY-8^ b -ST^ô

Os5j-^6\ci3bo Xb ^

LJ CO c

9)>cbo Sj^>oioo)ô2Sb S5oo ^ S"?o

c CO

Stoop"^^^3 ^JloôSôdJSpo cooed

>tfd&SSx>

"^ o Sn

"Sfib.

,Q--

o

IJ-LJ

23- o

oJ

eo

0%

ro

3n"3ri

cO'

^r^o^CO

OL-

I

^

3\

6

5c&

;V-

Q itj

VW%J

-GV

87V

1468 1684

T I

*3)

34

^ (?

sSo

673

. "/j ^

191-193 aotb3ex>-67 3

'"BrfociS ^S^TV ?) r5rtfo55o#

C

S By%.

Senart P. P. 1,254

(Vide Kshatriya Clans in Bud 1 hist India. ByBhimala Charan Law, M. A- B. L. Ed 193 - P. 2 9 3).

,

(^

W^bSfo.

w

(Lecchavi)

(Licchavi - Dauhitra).I. 5f)^7V^

ae) :ur*\t}c$5:oo ^Sofi^35 e*>) /'SPcS&w&rfS.

(Kshatriya Clans in Biidd, India P. 7)&(Vide Inscriptions of the Early Gupta Kings,

Edited by T. F. Fleet Corpus InscriptionumIndicarum Vol. Ill P 8S a

II.

^

Tfc^sa^^TT-8^j(5KS^ ffl (Vide Fleet Op. Git. P. 27)

III.

98 r5oii (Do Page 43)IV. aoo^JSoSSar'S'XbS aSs&-8&ifc iSj-oS

(Do Page 50)

..-jg S

Vic tf^(&X:>^)a

ft"d&>35 e^> "eF / So^^rf fe> (which Is

considered to be spurious e?

(Vide Fleet, Inscriptions of the Early GuptaKings, Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Vol. Ill P256., (&) Kshatriya Clans in Budd, India R 8)

'

(Licchivi)

a

w (Licchavi -\ / LJInac _ Vola ln 17

(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist times P=8); & IndianAntiquary Vol. IX P. 168.f.f.)

"

(Licchavi)(Vide Legge, FaHien P. P. 71, 76 )

(Licehavi)

(Vide Buddhist records of the Western World ByS. Beal Vol. II P. 73)

" The Licchavis were neither Tibetan nor Iranianin their origin, but there is very clear evidence in th

Buddhist literature to show that they belonged to theAryan ruling caste -the Kshatriya

9

\g^.jm^^.y^^^.^m,^i^.^,mi^ A-Mij\l!!^^J?i;iJV:mMa!g^ ; -reytpHiiir^qMrm^^^^ llmr-nnr-im

(Kshatrlya Clans In Buddhist India P. 9)eo

Q& cc

(5

C?

^)no L O

(Vide Mahaparinibhana Suttana. Translated byT. W. & C. A. F. Rhys Davids in Dialogues ofBuddha. VoL III P. 187).

"The Exalted one was a Kshatriya and so arewe- We are worthy to receive a portion of the relicsof the Exalted one ".

(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P. 9)

fi The Lord is a Kshatriya and so am

fore I deserve a share of the relics59

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India

-

"

Nikaya. P. T. S. VoL III P. P. 164, 1660 & KshatriyaClans in Budd. India P. 10)

A Licchavi named Mahali says,46 1 am a Kshatriya, so is the Buddha. If his

knowledge increases, and he becomes all -Knowing,why should it not happen to me

5 '

(Vide Suraangala Vilasim Pt I P. T, S. P. 312) &Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India, P A

8c55bo

*X B/ ..._.. IA3 J O 2^ O

no

ss The eighteen confederate Kings of Kasi andHosala the nlae Mallakis and Nine LIcchavis, on the

BEZjL-^g^^MRLiJail'.ti.'UBlLi.JLil^^^fflyTO7H"Sa>at-!ll^' _ VJ^ttBfmPfmf^!^

day of new moon, instituted in illumination on thePoshadha, which was a fasting day; for they said,

"

Since the light of intelligence is gone, Jet usmake an illumination of material matter ".

(Kalpa Sutra. 128 Translated by Prof. H. Jacobi, Vol. XXII P. 268) & Kshatriya Clans iii

Buddhist times P. 12)

(Vide Jacobi Op. Git. 108-110. P. P. 255-6. &P. X-XII). fKshtriya Clans in, Buddhist India P P13,36)

dtsss-8os5warfa. (Do P. 13)

oo

O

no Q a- --

1 3TtfsL

(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P. 14." The Liochavis were looked upon as persons of

very high Pedigree5?

(Kshatriya CJans in Buddhist India P. 13).5\-x-ctfcoOO - (& e^^SbsSoS' (vJospS^SDwo.T* 75oi520oTJ

"The Licchavis were Kshatriyas of VasisthaGotra" (do P. 13)

41 The Sakyas and the Licchavis are branches ofthe same people ".

(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P, 17/

" The Sakya, race (to which the Buddha belongedwas divided into three parts, whose most celebrated'epresentatives were Sakya the Great (the Buddha),3akya the Licchavi, and Sakya the rr ountaineer ".

(Vide His. of the Eastern Mongols, Page 21. By3anang Setsen & Kshatriya Clans 17),

oex. 3

''The first Tibetan King, belonged to the familyof Sakya the Licchavi ".

(The life of the Buddha. By Rockhill Popular.Edition Page 203 Note )

" The Licchavis were of pure Kshatriya parentageon both sides

"

(Page 27 of Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India),

The Licchavis were pure Kshatiiyas by_origin^(Kshatriya Clans in Btrld. India P. 25)

\

4 * Just as Ajatasatru had gbried in the -title of% '

Videhiputto9

\ the son of a daughter of Videha

people, that is, of the Licchavis who occupied the.Videha country, so also it was considered a glory to

an orthodox Gupta Emperor to have been a "Lecchavidauhitra or the son of a daughter of the Licchavis.

1'

(Kshatiiya Clans in Budihist India P. 27.. 28.)

11 The power and glory of the Licchavis duringthe period of Brahmanic revival under the Guptaswere as great as under the Sisunakas and the

43

Mauryas and that their position as one of the leading

and most honoured Kshatriya fannies in Eastern

India was fully recognise 1."

(Kshatriya Clans In Buddhist Inlia P. 29)

(Vide SigaUjataka Edited by V. Fausboll Vol, IIIP. 5) & Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P. 10Foot-Note 3.)

^(^ O

&i^SdSb189 rfoii (i n 37*11 1713)

^ptfo

x x:, ^^ a ^v

V o G?a- 5$!;55Stfj S'e) 276* o?Y-c^bSo 282 >

A son-in-law of thg_Ljj^ a sou ofGhatotkacha Gupta, Chandra Gupta 1 Established a

itm^LiU|-^''r'Miinii'jiy--!'^j^^Tfcyrrp^'^ri-ffl^^ B^^tt^iy^p^^g-jqaj^Mp^-^g.-a^afflif"ii^p} r^****Mjp|3my7^f

fl

o

. 457

\o

o

(\

TP=rf ^3^^^/eSb tf ^sSbr^

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India P- I Si 5)."In the Nepal Vamsavali, the Liccha^is have

been alloted to the Suryavamsa or solar race of ttfeKshatriyas.'*

(Indian Antiquary. Vol. XXXVII P. P. 78-90)Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India P, 14)

)Kshatriya Clans in BuiH. India P. 17.

(Kshtriya Clans in Budd, India. P?^Co

So^S,

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India P 23)

(if! ^rII327 to 82

11

It was considered a glory to an_o^thodox_Giipfca

Emperor to have been a Licchavi - Puhitiaor the sonof a daughter of the Licohavis."

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd, India (P. P. 27 9 2

V "V

Dr. Fleet

" The Llcchavis were then at least of equal rankand power with the early Guptas is shown by the pridemanifested by the latter in this alliance as exhibitedin the record of names of Kumara Devi etc. 9 '

(Kshatriya Glaus in Buddhist India P. 28) & J.Fleet 9 Gupta Insertions-' Co rpous Ins. Ind. VoL IIIIntroduction, P. 155

V

o

eT

&n>tfo

-3

Tc? e

cj--^do-ae.

a atf ^Tris5e5og)^o, ^uT-Sob'o^ osSotfK) rfo^Po-O

G

QsSb es^tfox&e^ rfiSD^) ^^-sy^ SooSfo^b "S

"3 'Soo'S dfibooS^(8d!5b

o

^^J

$b^.- C?

^ft & ^ TTO o*> ~P^ K X> ^t?U AO oJ O

TP & "e3 S SS

, (8)

8)5-888; (2)9 2

cxxr^

o

/

V950-958 sSSSS

/Vv

PO c

aeo

3

8.

5,

(1021

1026C?

e 13, 14

o.

o980 Klolltfo

)

S)B

(v-

o2.

6 e 3^055^0 7.

(

"3.

972

o

co

1003 tfolltfo

V. (p

v

^3-8

00

V G "VS"

,& ^S^5^^> Oîi -

)8orf aS-ttrfb cô^ Si

no

SSsSa"^êX)"^^^) -^ôo-

O1. &tf\b^ôo 2. ^^J'rfK'tf^wScssboex), 8.

roi

V

6. 8S* g'. 7. sfcsdfc, 8. r^&cssb, 9.x '1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9

,

8o

/

a3

-a^T>o"-s^tf;lx>^**

%J

o'-

.--

B'

^r r

^

(^

aioooo-D

(Vide History of India By K. V. Rangaswamylyyangar. Part I Page 93).

" The Vajjians, a confederation of eight clans ofvhich the chief were the Licchavis of Vaisah."

(Ancient India. By S. Krishnaswamy Ayyangar3d. 1911 Page

(Vide Cunnigham, Ancient Geography of India

P. 447).

66 Some of the coins of Chandra Gupta 1 have the

name" Licchavl 9

'

on them"(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India. P. 8)

"v

e

eo

tfnfc B-'oSxSb \rib7VS)ij

o5

C4-)

"A gold coin was introduced under the name ofChandra Gupta 1 On one side of it were insiscd thefigures of Chandra Gupta and his queen KumaraDevi and the words

"

Chandra Gupta" " Sree Kumara

Devi " in the Brahmi Character, and on the otherside were engraved the fignre of Laxml, the goddessof Fortune seated on a Lion and the word " Liccha-vayah

5!.

("Kshafcriya Clans In Buddhist India P. 137) &Prachina Mudra By R. D Banerjee. P. 122).

rn

^)^7T -vV

o

2-

tfo/ &;&) SS 8oo&r&~S tfrfb ffoL *

rasb T^8 Xorf-^ti$& -soo_ (pL

2J(Sd^o^"^aS:>u)

(J58wo$8's5a37vo

"

200

3.

...... /eol) 3^5r*K5e

oo ocn^roo

o )(rd ro ^^re

4.

\

o

// s s> ^.L ~ V

/

V. P)____-'T^L

/

C~c

_

i?o )sroo D5j-sr'o

9 r>o 25

90 s6

" The second record of the Gupta heritage^likewise perpetuated on stone, is to be seen in theMathura inscription from the Katra Mound, whereinSamudra's parentage is apparently repeated in accor-dance with the tenor of the earlier monument Thegenealogy of the family is further extended in the

District of Ghazipur a and Its counterpart at Bihar,

and an unnamed heir/ 5

lb (X'oSJQ

. L Ss

~i .'"V i

.

OL >v-

S.

w,

girls born in Vaisah, to that city alone" No marriage

was to ba contracted outside Valsali.

(Kshatriya Cldiis In Buddfa, India

v -7.) L /

o

g'tfowtfb "B-Sb\S^(6S6oi&>e6ioooSSb2j ^*J

XJ

s -

tf b'

"V

w

eo

EI (Kumara Devi) She ^belonged to a royal familyof the Licchavis."

(Kshatriya Clans in Bnddhisfc India P. 137).

212 O no

oo

9^r'exr-'QO, 212'

VvXJ cWixXJ \J Cj&J fO &J &J oJ cxXJ C>c(\XJj

.y_

-tfo/tf^^ SS-O\"3

" Ghaadragupta was crowned as King of Kings, adate thereafter reckoned as the beginning of the greatGupta Era, To celebrate the event lie struck coinsinscribed With his own name, that of his queen,Kumara Davi, and of the Licchavi Clans of which he

X

XJ~s

11

It is wholly misleading to describe the GuptaEra as a Hindu or Brahraanical reaction, Ttwas ratheran Aryan revival, for it was the effort of the AryanK^trivas, aided by the Aryan Brahmins, to restorethe political and spiritual supremacy of the Indo-Aryan race in Aryavarta. 95

His, of the Aryan Rule in India. By HavelLP.P. 151-52.

v- (p

oi

01

efo-Cfc-Sb

eo

"They (The Gupta Emperors) were fall-bloodedAryans of the historic Licchavi Clan who rallied the

*

nmu.niiaimini ..... ni llllm__^rT_TIII , B|| ........... . --- n-J -_____^____^,, ^_^__

Kshatriya Clans to the defence of the Tryavartaagainst the Turks, and HLIDS of those days who werethreatening the existence of Aryan Empire in India"

(Bhandarkar's Commemoration Vol. P. 442Ed. 1917.

x.

"Mr. Allen presumes that Jfemudr^^bornjg.j., _L ic.chajjjJarn . Iy an 1 to keep up the memoryof the father, Chandragupta and mother, KumaraDevi the coin was Issued 9 5 .

(Kshatnya Claris in Budd. India, P. 137).

6S

Samudragupta by Ms conquests considerablyenlarged the Empire of the Guptas ..... .and reassertingthe principle of Kshatriya hegemony over the wholeof India 9 '

(HavelFs History of the Aryan Rule in India P. 154).

15

Sanskrit, therefore, naturally was the official

language oi the Gupta Imperial Court"(Do Book P, 155).

41 The village kathaks found ready listeners topraises of the mighty kshafcriya (Samudragupta) then-B^afTgmmmLaaagaTOn- nmnxrTmrvKfn. . Mamifk**iatfm*mttmm*aiH'..fUfmia,fiseated on Rama's throne at Ayodhya."

(Havell's His. of the Aryan Rule in India P. 155)

Qtfo

S^Sooo

"The Guptas were undoubte ily the representa-f-Ttm-KXiJi _|f^rt^ ?^ri--nnyjy.'i HJ , fBja^jJtt.u-i^^ JJd *^ ..MUBBwBM.TtTJHaMiiifc.^jtriii)u> âiafcj.gÛ _J-fflmi-.-^Tr''TrftpKt1 [rfj^ffT[r^Trâv.^-^'a.^t^L ,t .-.^T >Î^^T^ ip*eu^ ..idtif^j^Jne^.^-r^^^

tives of Aryan Kshattiya tradition,5 ' (Do P. 178).

!T"II

"In fact the instinct of caste lias become soIngrained in and natural to the Indian mind, that theKa]aputs of pure Aryan descent decline even now, asthousands of years ago, to take girls from, or givegirls in marriage to the Aryans of mixed descentwhether they be the Kshatriyas of the united provin-ces, or the Kathis of Katiawar and the Maharatta ofMaharastra." (Epic India. By Q. V Vaidya P. 45)

IT !!

o-rf\"ô^ e^,9c55boe>D"

,5

1940

ds

o

800 tfeo

" No one " he wrotess

is allowed to marry out ofhis own class or exercise any calling except his own?

5

(Epic India P. 49. By a V. Vaidya, M. A )

S' ooo$tfrf\o).

G ,945

11 There is no doubt whatever that the castesystem as we know it to-day with all its elaboraterestrictions with regard to marrige. food, ceremonialpollution, etc. existed in its iully developed form inthe days of Harsha. 9 ' (i. e a 606-640 A. D.)

i

606^640

E^Q S&T*?! 1

12

o3. tffitt

fc-

z.

o a tf

2

V,

1J

O W3"iSjJ

c

,o eo' i T

e 284s "4>tiej e9fc>"3o5fc^ ^V 8 '

c 23

o r

The Genesis of the Human Race

GjoSb

oO

LJ

o 5050 00

o 5050

D

86

3188 (li ^. 1950) sSea&S

^*Pdtfbw&c52775 4988 o (II

1836

827

1S2

o

S'O 2775 oir e) 5050

1949)

((n

PtfdSoo;

XIVTHE HINDU, Sunday, July 17, 1949

Manavasrishti Vijnanam. (Tho Genesis -of thHuman. Kace, )

By Kota Veukatachalara (Author)Gandhinagar, Vijayavada.

"This is an attempt to ascertain the cradle olmankind with the almost exclusive aid of Vedic tostimoney, The author believes that the first man was anAryan and that he was created in Aryavarta - theValley of the Saraawati, etc,

XVINDIAN REPUBLIC, Monday, July, 18; 1949.

a o

>*

I I

oofl

o

Q

O ^ X" tf O

S) Zj cSSb ttT 2e 2.

SXr

no,36-.Y-1949

- o ?>)^g'o

^^

&ii

c5o

ep- 6 d Sa ST 60

>

18-10-49.

no

no

v

i .'

j3

L

o

(

"8- dfoS- o;5a

J7_My Dear Sir,

I thank you sincerely for sending me a copy ofyour excellent book"Manavasrishti Vijnanam". You

nave given convincing reasons for your views I feel

aS.reclSUr^^ r6C6iV6 6Ver inCreasin^ Public

S, R, B. & 0. V. B. College,f*

So

1)26

3

( D

'/

\

o

6

9 0-

(The Genesis of the Human Race) & itfo#5&>3b^Q

00

VII

a Q 40^

; ^'x7o

.The process of the Evolution of the Universeexplained therein is covincing to all unprejudicedminds I have my own doubts as to whether theleaders of our secular state will give the book theattention it deserves. I hope it will enable the presentand coming generations to know in an understandingmanner the eternal truths contained In our ancientbooks.

VIII

CV

Dear Sir, 13I thank you once more heartily for sending me the

book " Manavasrishti Vijnanarn 5 ' which I have readwith great Interest and benefit to myself, and admirethe profound knowledge and close reasoning which itdisplays on the subject which greatly enhances theprestige of the Aryan Race.






a o

The need for a reorientation of the study of IndianHistory is well indicated by the facts brought out

t tl 11 H^j*A V \J> 14. (yin this work. .

"

&t In this exceedingly well written booklet, theauthor has collecte 1 and set forth all the Vedic' andPuranic authorities bearing on the question of theorigin of the Human race and original home of the

His opening up of the mine of evidence relating tothat question must appeal to the heart of every

i "* 1 * T" U a qj> . * ^ " VJi V,,,,....,.Ia(Jlan >' ete

_

XVIIo

o~ e^)o/90"e3^5o ? &â iô^ô3^r^& & 11-12-^1949

28w^gd&o 5 S 6 ^'rfêx> - "lXAb?r"sS$iw 9-685 S!






a o

gupta rajulu evaru

Documents