gueymard-variability 3tier webinar web 2010

Upload: smartchris

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    1/15

    Christian A. Gueymard

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    2/15

    Direct normal irradiance (DNI) global horizontal irradiance (GHI) vary

    smoothly under clear skies, but can vary extremely fast under partly cloudy

    skies, e.g., from 0 to 1000 W/m2 in a second for DNI.

    These fast transient conditions did not show easily in the past, when only

    hourly data were available. Time steps of 1-min become the norm for first-

    class stations. Some research stations use 1-sec to 5-sec time steps.

    ExampleTypical partly-cloudy day

    for Oahu, HI

    GHI up to 25% more than

    ETHI* during lensing

    effect peaks, around noon. DNI also increases by a

    few %, due to large transientcircumsolar diffuse.

    * Extraterrestrial horizontal

    irradiance

    Short-term Variability(1)

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    3/15

    Short-term variability may be a problem for PV/CPV due to peaks in power

    output that need to be absorbed. CSP plants cant usually operate below

    some thresholdDNI. Q: Can these transient effects be correctly accounted

    for in the daily, monthly or annual solar resource if the irradiance is not

    measured fast enough?

    Example

    Typical day in Oahu, HI

    Various thresholds:

    0, 100, 200 and 300 W/m2

    Various measurementtime steps considered:

    3 sec, 1 min, 15 min, 1 hr

    Hourly time step may be

    too coarse for accuratesystem simulation

    No gain in accuracy

    likely for steps < 1 min This topic needs further

    research, toward the

    definition of an optimum measurement (or modeled) data time step.

    Short-term Variability(2)

    0.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    1 100

    Oahu, Hawaii5 July 2010

    Relativedailyirradiation

    Time step (sec)

    3 sec 1 min 15 min 1 hr

    Threshold (W/m2)

    0100200

    300

    Total DNI: 7 kWh/m2

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    4/15

    There are good years and bad years in everything, like in GHI, and even more so in

    DNI, due to: Climate cycles (El Nio, La Nia), changes in release of natural

    aerosols, increase or decrease in pollution, volcanic eruptions, climate change

    For GHI, it might take only 23 years of measurement to be within 5% of the long-term mean. For DNI, it takes much longer, up to 515 years.

    Short measurement periods (e.g. 1 year) are not sufficient for serious DNI resource

    assessment!

    Special techniques must be used to

    correct long-term modeleddata usingshort-term measureddata.

    Interannual Variability(1)

    Eugene data: http://solardat.uoregon.edu/

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    5/15

    Interannual variability in DNI is much higher (at least double) than that in

    GHI. This variability is higher in cloudier climates (low Kn), but still

    significant in clearer regions (high Kn), which are targeted by CSP/CPV.

    Plots and maps provide this variability in terms ofCoefficient of Variation

    (COV): COV = St. Dev. / Mean

    Interannual Variability(2)

    http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/new_data/variability

    S. Wilcox and C.A. Gueymard, Spatial and temporal

    variability in the solar resource in the United States.

    ASES Conf., 2010.

    C.A. Gueymard, Fixed or tracking solar collectors?

    Helping the decision process with the Solar Resource

    Enhancement Factor. SPIE Conf. #7046, 2008.

    Kn = DNI/ETNI

    This is significant at only a 66% probability

    level. For a bankable 95% probability,double the COV results.

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    6/15

    Only the past solar resource can be known with some (relative) degree of

    certainty. But the goal of resource assessment is to obtain projections of 2030

    years into the future. Q: How can this be done if there are unknown forcingsthat result in long-term trends?

    Only a handful of stations in the world have measured radiation for more than

    50 years. Long-term trends in GHI and DNI have been detected. Periods of

    Brightening and Dimming are now documented.

    Long-term Variability(1)

    Early brightening Dimming Brightening

    GHI, 19372006

    Potsdam,Germany

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    7/15

    Long-term trends do not affect the world equally.

    Current results indicate a brightening in most of the

    NH, and a dimming in the tropical regions of theNH and SH. India and China are directly affected,

    most probably because of the current increase in

    coal burning and pollution (Asian Brown Cloud).

    Long-term Variability(2)

    M. Wild et al., J. Geophys. Res. 114D, doi:10.1029/2008JD011382, 2009

    M. Wild, J. Geophys. Res. 114D, doi:10.1029/2008JD011470, 2009

    Trends in GHI

    (% per decade)

    Good news in some

    areas,bad news in others!

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    8/15

    How

    Most long-term variability results are for GHI (because most available data).

    One difficulty is to transform these results into DNI variability. There are

    regions where DNI varies more than GHI, others where the reverse occurs.

    Long-term Variability(3)

    L.D. Riihimaki et al., J. Geophys. Res. 114D, doi:10.1029/2008JD010970, 2009

    How the resource will vary during the next 2030

    years depends on many unknowns: Air quality regulations and Kyoto-type accords

    Climate change evolution Possible geoengineering (forced dimming)

    Volcanic eruptions, etc.

    So nobody has a definite answer!

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    9/15

    Main Causes Consequences

    Long-term Variability(4)

    Cloud climatology Emissions of black

    carbon (BC) and other

    aerosols

    Humidity patterns

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    10/15

    Spatial variability is important for two reasons:

    In regions of low spatial variability, use of low-res resource maps (e.g.,

    100x100 km) might be OK, at least for preliminary design. Conversely, in

    regions of high spatial variability, only hi-res maps (10x10 km or better)

    should be used.

    If variability is high, measured data from only nearby weather stations

    should be trusted.

    Spatial Variability

    5x5 matrix

    10x10 km grid cells

    S. Wilcox and C.A. Gueymard, Spatial and temporal

    variability in the solar resource in the United States.

    ASES Conf., 2010.

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    11/15

    For decades, TMYs have been used by engineers to simulate solar systems or

    building energy performance. TMYs conveniently replace

    30 years of datawith a single typical year. Models of solar system power output prediction(e.g., PVWatts, http://www.nrel.gov/rredc/pvwatts/) or of performance and

    economic estimates to help decision making (e.g., Solar Advisor Model,

    https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/sam/) still rely heavily on TMY-type data.

    To define each of the 12 months of a synthetic year, TMYs use weighting

    factors to select the most typical year among a long series of available data(including modeled irradiance). In the U.S., three different series of TMY files

    have been produced. The weight they all use for DNI is relatively small.

    It should not be construed that TMY3 is more advanced or better than TMY2!

    TMY data for

    the U.S.

    Typical Meteorological YearTMY(1)

    TMY TMY2 TMY3

    Period 19521975 1961-1990 (i) 19762005(ii) 19912005

    GHI weight 12/24 5/20 5/20

    DNI weight 0 5/20 5/20

    # Stations 222 239 (i) 239(ii)

    950

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    12/15

    Q:Are TMY data appropriate for all solar applications?

    TMYs have some potential drawbacks: Solar TMY data is 100% modeled. At clear sites, the TMY2/TMY3 hourly

    distributions usually show discrepancies above 500 W/m2, compared to measureddata. This is due to the use of climatological monthly values (rather than discrete

    daily values) for the aerosol data.

    Hourly values are used. This may not be ideal for non-linear systems with

    thresholds above 150 W/m2 (due to short-term variability).

    Non-typical bad years are excluded from the data pool. Using TMYs for riskassessment is risky.

    Typical Meteorological YearTMY(2)

    Hourly frequencies of

    19912005 NSRDB data used

    to obtain TMY3 for Golden, CO.Compared to measurements,

    note the NSRDB and TMY3

    overestimations below

    900 W/m2, and

    underestimations above.

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

    Golden, COSunup hourly frequencies

    Measured

    NSRDB

    TMY3

    Frequen

    cy%

    DNI bins (W/m2)

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    13/15

    To obtain bankable data, the use of TMYs is inappropriate. The risk of bad

    years cannot be assessed correctly. TMY may seriously overestimate the P90

    exceedance probability. Example: For Boulder, the total annual DNI from TMY2happens to correspond to P50, but this is probably not a general rule.

    Typical Meteorological YearTMY(3)

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    14/15

    Critical part of solar resource

    assessment, necessary to sort

    out local variability effects at

    different time scales!

    Two types of weather stations,

    depending on radiometer

    technology.

    Minimum measurement period

    recommended: 1 year.

    Performance and prices vary

    [Ask us for more details and

    custom solutions!]

    These short-term

    measurements should then be

    used to correct long-term

    satellite-based modeled data

    using appropriate statistical

    methods.

    Local Measurements

  • 8/3/2019 Gueymard-Variability 3Tier Webinar Web 2010

    15/15

    Thank you!

    http://www.SolarConsultingServices.com