guest columinist death by tax cuts: the...

1
The Chronicle 6 - May 10, 2017 www.charlestonchronicle.net When I was a kid – all those years ago – we used a phrase, “making friends”, that referred to building re- lationships. Making friends was se- rious business. It meant you had a bond, you cared about your friend, would support and defend your friend. People don’t make friends anymore. They develop alliances and have acquaintances. That’s okay because as the old folks would tell us, everyone ain’t gonna be your friend. I thought of making friends the other day as I read the news story about folks at South Carolina State University who protested Gov. Henry McMaster being chosen to give the graduation speech. It struck me as odd. SCSU President James Clark addressed the protest noting the imperiled institution has to develop some diverse relation- ships. Yuh think??? Republicans in the state’s legisla- ture almost shut down the institu- tion a couple of years ago and well may be on their way to continuing that process now! I‘d think the last thing you’d want to do is tick off the titular head of the legislature. Never mind that the guy is the gov- ernor! I don’t get the logic of protesting the governor making the graduation speech at a state sup- ported school. That might be cool if SCSU had an alternative funding source, but you don’t bite the hand that feeds you. For years my old publisher, Jim French, was incensed that the leg- islature never would name Interna- tional Longshoremen Association Local 1422 President Kenny Riley to the S.C. State Port Authority board. Jim, who by the way is at home these days resting as his grandsons man the day-to-day tasks of the newspaper’s operations, in- cessantly prodded me to write the story. I never did. McMaster hasn’t chosen Riley for the authority ei- ther. I think Riley masterfully has forged alliances and acquaintances which alternatively benefit his con- stituents. When it comes to making friends, you must be careful. “Be careful who your friends are”, my mom used to caution. Her admonition reminds me that you should keep your friends close and your enemies closer. There are those who see Re- publicans as enemies. Personally, I think that’s a mistake, but for the sake of argument, even if it were ships nor alliances on the front end. The late John All, one of the best editors I’ve ever known, said it’s eas- ier to start from scratch than to start over. That’s where building al- liances, if not friendships, become so important. Last week as part of the U.S. Small Business Administration’s National Small Business Week ac- tivities, the City of Charleston held several events. Mayor John Teck- lenburg invited small business own- ers and their advocates to a round table discussion to talk about their strengths, challenges and opportu- nities for the city to help facilitate their success. Now, I’ve heard Black business people over the years say such events seldom yield any business activity for them. But two things come to my mind – you’ve got to be in it to win it and somebody’s got to be at the table. I think the Tri-County Cradle to Career Collaborative is another of those opportunities. The five-year-old initiative brings business people together with schools to focus on educational out- comes. I was introduced to the con- cept when the former public relations woman came to the paper. I’ve always had some skepticism about the initiative. First thing I questioned was why those folks all of a sudden were so gung-ho about preparing our kids for jobs. Okay, so that was pretty much a no- brainer - the economic incentive is obvious. I also asked myself why those folks were coming to the Black Press. We’d been ignored in the past. Then it dawned on me – I was asking stupid questions – take the opportunity and run, dummy, I said to myself! I’ve always thought that the racism and prejudice that prevented peo- ple from developing relationships which benefit the participants was illogical and that the barriers we put up which prevent our collective progress are counterproductive. It really doesn’t matter where the help comes from as long as you get the help! If that help comes in the form of the Meeting Street Academy at Brentwood, the proposed Path- ways In Education school for at- risk teens or a commencement speech by Gov. McMaster, so be it. But I think it may be to everyone’s advantage to get together and build some alliances even if we don’t make friends. true, that means we should keep them close. I think it makes good sense to build relationships with your adversaries. In that respect, I don’t understand why more Black folks aren’t building relationships with the municipal administrations in Charleston and North Charleston. On that note, I can’t figure why we aren’t building more relationships with some of the people who do business in our communities. It’s easy to tear stuff down; building something up is more difficult and can be more rewarding. Some in the Black community righteously are pitted against business owners who exploit our weaknesses. Well, the first thing is we have to strengthen our weaknesses, but in the meantime, maybe we should be building some relationships with those folks. We receive not because we ask not. Why should I do busi- ness with those who won’t recipro- cate the favor? Trust me, the rice ain’t that good and we can buy beer and cigarettes anywhere. I’m old enough to remember when the United States was adversaries with dang near every nation that wasn’t located in the northern hemi- sphere. Today the Japanese, Chi- nese and other foreign investors own everything in Black communi- ties from the neighborhood conven- ience stores to the local motels. On the other side of the equation, there are Burger King restaurants in Bei- jing. What’s it called – quid pro quo, tit for tat? What part are we missing? It bothers me that few from our communities are employed at the neighborhood Chinese restaurant or convenience store. But as North Charleston Branch NAACP Pres- ident Ed Bryant noted, other mer- chants also fail to reinvest in us. His counterpart at the Charleston Branch NAACP, Dot Scott, lamented it’s taken so long for Black residents to mount an impas- sioned challenge the economic dy- namics that shape the retail economy of our communities and that the challenge comes after the video recorded assault of a resident. National Action Network coordi- nator Elder James Johnson said bringing that challenge to fruition won’t be easy, but the organiza- tion’s committed to that goal. Lofty goal I’d say when folks collectively have worked neither to build friend- Black to BLACK By Barney Blakeney Mother’s Day is a special time set aside to recognize mothers nationally. And, if your mother has passed away, it’s a time of re- flection. There is barely a day that goes by that I don’t think about my mother. Sometimes, it’s just the little things that pop up during the day that set your mind in motion. Personally, I was never a one day daughter. My mother was my world and we spent quite a bit of time together, but there is just something special about a national day of recognition for mothers. Mother’s Day is a time for me to reflect not only on my mother, grandmother and all my adoptive moms that have passed on but ladies that have been like a mother to me. I often think about my grand- mother and summers spent with her on the farm. I thought about the outhouse and the water- melon fields. I can still smell the aroma of the homecooked bis- cuits and cornbread baked on a cast iron wood stove. And, even more memorable were the days spent worshipping at the little old potbellied wood stove family church. Even when I was out of my mother’s reach, my grand- mother was there. She made sure I went to Sunday School and church. That was non-nego- tiable. I am reminded of one of granny’s favorite songs she used to sing in church-“Jesus Will Fix It For You.” (Pronounced- Jee- saws). Granny couldn’t carry a tune in a bucket, and neither can I, but that did not stop her from being a one woman choir and it’s never stopped me either. She would always start a song sitting down. Then she would stand up and make her way to the front of the church and by that time everyone was standing on their feet joining in the song. Despite all of granny’s ups and downs, I ad- mire her for being such a bold By Beverly Gadson-Birch WHO ASKED ME? Death by tax cuts: The Republican health care plan Donald Trump hosted a cele- bration in the White House Rose Garden for House Repub- licans after they passed their party’s health care plan by the thinnest of margins. They were celebrating what Trump called a “win,” without any thought about consequences. None of them had read the bill, which was released only a couple of days before the vote and rushed to the floor. The vote took place before the nonparti- san Congressional Budget Of- fice could issue a revised assessment of its costs and ef- fects. House leaders and Office of Management and Budget Direc- tor Mick Mulvaney dismissed criticisms, saying that Senate Re- publicans planned to start all over anyway. This bill addresses one-sixth of our national econ- omy, and an industry that has been a leading source of jobs growth. Don’t worry, say House Republicans, we just had to get the win; forget about the sub- stance. Americans shouldn’t just be worried; they should be furious. The Republican bill will throw literally millions off health care, put people with pre-existing con- ditions at risk and raise premi- ums particularly for workers aged 50 to 64 — in order to give a massive tax break to the very wealthy. At the annual shareholders meeting of Berkshire Hathaway, billionaire investor Warren Buf- fett called it for what it is: “a huge tax cut for guys like me.” The richest 400 people in America will get a tax break estimated at about $7 million a year. To pay for that, millions will lose their coverage, and millions more — the elderly and those with pre-ex- isting conditions in various states — will see premiums soar and in- surance become unaffordable. You can’t sugarcoat this. It’s not enough to say the Senate will fix it (the 13 white men — no women, no people of color — on the Republican Senate Working Group certainly will not). It’s not acceptable to say, “We don’t mean it; we just had to pass it.” Why did they have to pass it? This is complicated, but if you follow it, you can understand the backroom plunder that is taking place. As Peter Suderman ex- plained in the New York Times, Republicans have to pass it be- cause the top-end tax cuts in the health care bill are vital for their central goal: to deliver to their corporate and wealthy donors another massive tax cut in the next budget reconciliation vote. They have to do the tax cuts in what’s called “reconciliation” be- cause that allows them, under the obscure rules of the Con- gress, to pass the bill with only 50 votes — with only Republican votes. But the reconciliation rules only allow tax cuts if they don’t raise deficits after a 10-year window. So to get what Trump calls the mother of all tax cuts, Republi- cans want to cut the taxes out of Obamacare in the FY2017 recon- ciliation (that only lasts until next September) and then have a lower baseline for cutting taxes in the FY2018 reconciliation (the budget that begins on October 1). Tax cuts for the wealthy will be paid for by sickness and death by millions of the uninsured. Republican Sen. John McCain criticizes the House for proceed- ing without a CBO estimate of the costs, saying, “I want to know how much it costs.” Republican senators vow not to act until the CBO reports. The CBO’s esti- mate will show what we already know from its last estimate: Mil- lions will lose their insurance, and the wealthy will pocket mil- lions in tax cuts. A former insurance executive, Richard Eskow, did the real math. He took the best estimates of how many avoidable deaths come from not having health in- surance with the rollback of Medicaid and taking away pro- tections for pre-existing condi- tions. He compared that to the tax cuts that would be pocketed by the 400 richest Americans, people who, like Buffett, make on average over $300 million a year. Here’s his estimate of the real cost: Ten people will die under the Republican bill to give each of the 400 richest people in America a tax break. For every "+&"+* *'+#) * $$'+) &) $$ (( person who dies, they’ll pocket about $787,151. As Eskow noted, those rich beneficiaries aren’t likely to know anyone who will lose his or her life as a result of being stripped of health insur- ance. And while the $787,000 isn’t much for a multimillionaire, it’s just the appetizer for the big take they will get out of the Trump tax cut plan that will fol- low. Thirteen white, rich men will now create the Republican plan in the Senate. They’ll decide how many millions to strip from health insurance to pay for tax cuts many of them will enjoy. They’ll decide whether to de- prive low-wage women of Planned Parenthood’s health care services. They’ll decide just how many deaths are needed to cover the tax cuts for the very rich. Ugly language? No this is a morally indefensible, ugly piece of work. It is simply obscene to choose consciously to condemn low- wage workers or older workers to unnecessary illness and death in order to afford tax cuts for the already wealthy. DISCLAIMER: e opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the various authors of editorials/opinions, etc. that appear in this publication do not necessarily reect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of e Charleston Chronicle. LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Letters to the editor are welcome and encouraged. Submit your letter via e-mail to [email protected]. Please include name, address, and daytime phone number for verication purposes. 1111King Street, Charleston, SC 29403 • P.O. Box 20548 843.723.2785 oce • 843.737.5443 fax [email protected] www.charlestonchronicle.net witness. I never heard her complain of what she didn’t have. She always appreciated what she had. I got my “can’t carry a tune in a bucket from her”. I know my limita- tions and singing is one of them. Mothers play such an impor- tant role in a child’s develop- ment. A mother’s work is never done. Child rearing is no easy feat by no stretch of the imagination. Mothers have been instrumental in shaping the lives of some of the greatest archi- tects, astronauts, physicians, mayors, presidents, preachers, teachers, artists, movers and shakers, etc., of this nation. My mom had 10 children. She was in her forties when she found out she was having twins. And, boy did she boo hoo cry, but they turned out to be the joy of her life. Being such a late bloomer with the twins, Mother would pray the same prayer over and over that the Lord would let her live to see the twins finish kinder- garten and then it was high school. After the twins graduated from high school, then her prayer went to “Lord, let me live to see the twins get married”, following the twins getting married the prayer changed to seeing her grandchildren grow up and then great grandchildren. Being the cut up that I was, I ribbed mom about her prayers. I said, “mom, you are running out of children, grandchildren and great grand- children. The Lord has gra- ciously extended your time and if He kept on extending your time, you would be here until Jesus comes and just be caught up in the air”. We would laugh lov- ingly about her prayers but the truth of the matter is mom’s prayers were answered. Y’all bet- ter watch out if you have a pray- ing mother. If y’all don’t know what prayer can do, y’all better ask somebody. The strange thing about life is if you live long enough you get to see so much of your parents’ qualities in yourself. The older I get the more I act like my mom. Now, I find myself repeating the same prayers as she did. My son is grown; I pray constantly for him. And now, like my mom, I am working on my four-year-old grandson. Like my mom, my daughter-in-law was a late bloomer. Y’all who know me know that I am almost as old as water, so y’all do the math! If God grants my petition to see my grandson graduate from high school, that’s not just “prayer an- swering” but a miracle. And, let’s not even think about my grand- son graduating from college. I, like mom, might as well wait around and be “caught up in the air”. What I miss most about mom not being here are the family din- ners. She was the glue that kept the family together. All ten of her children would show up for din- ner with their children and she would be beaming with joy like she was “queen for the day”. That’s why we celebrate moms. We celebrate the queens that they are. We celebrate their many sacrifices. We celebrate their joys and their tears. For every mother who may not feel loved and appreciated, you are. Remember this! You don’t have to be a mother to mother children. Keep on doing what you do best and your rewards will be many. Happy Mother’s Day!! GUEST COLUMINIST By Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, Sr., Founder and President of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition The shrill conservative Ann Coulter has made headlines because the Uni- versity of California, Berkeley, wouldn’t let her speak at the end of April. Invited by college Republicans, her appearance threatened to incite vio- lence, as activists on the left and on the right prepared to either protest or support her appearance. In the end, the University cancelled her appear- ance, saying it could not guarantee her safety, which has the effect of pro- viding the notorious loudmouth an enlarged platform. National news programs have featured Coulter yammering about the anti-immigration speech she might have given. And credible, national newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post have both covered the issue on its news pages, but also printed opinion pieces about the disturbing trend of violent protests when conservative speakers – the Manhattan In- stitute’s Heather McDonald, and Bell Curve author and racist provocateur Charles Murray among them – are invited to campuses. Who’s afraid of a shrill conservative? Liberals shouldn’t be. Sure, people like Ann Coulter de- serve to be protested. But they also deserve to be heard. Protest can take many forms. Students who oppose the Coulter blather can peacefully gather outside a venue where she is speaking with picket signs highlighting their points. They can peacefully attend her lecture and attempt to ask questions after her lecture. They can take to com- munity forums – from radio and television to cam- pus newspapers, to articulate their opposition to her views. They can stage counter events – how about a pro- immigration speaker scheduled at exactly the same time as the Coulter lecture, where opposition attendance is exponentially larger than hers. Or, they can simply ignore her presence on campus. Cancelling her appearance gives her more exposure than she deserves. It is also a form of censorship that cuts both ways. At Claremont McKenna College, police brutality defender Heather McDonald gave her talk via live stream because college administrators feared violence if there was a large audience. Protesters banged on the windows in the room where she gave her talk, making it difficult to hear her. How would those of us that support the Black Lives Matter movement respond if BLM leaders were treated the same way McDonald was? And aren’t BLM supporters ca- pable of responding to McDonald’s nonsense? Universities are supposed to be places where minds are opened and ideas are exchanged. If provocative speakers can’t visit a university, who can? Jesse Jackson "() !*%' (! % "*'$$ (#)+*%&'+ (&"+*) % +!$+&'(#) (! % %"&+* And where better to hear ideas, no matter how offensive, than at a univer- sity lecture or forum. I’d not like to have Heather McDonald or Ann Coul- ter as a commencement speaker. In a celebratory space it would be positively offensive to have students of color be forced to share their big day with those who would implicitly deny their very right to exist. But I see no harm in having folks like McDonald, Coulter, or Murray speak on campus. Indeed, it is perhaps most effective to have them debate some of those who disagree with them. I once had the pleasure of rebutting Charles Murray after one of his Bell Curve talks. This happened more than a decade ago, but I’d like to think I handed his words back to him with aplomb. If the applause meter was any indication, I wiped the stage with him. If my memory serves me right, Murray refused a one-on-one de- bate proposing, instead, that he would give his talk and I could rebut it. On another occasion, I was initially contracted to debate the anti-affirma- tive action activist Ward Connerly. He slithered out of the debate, and even refused to appear on a panel with me. No matter. I used his printed words as a basis for refuting his flawed arguments against affirmative ac- tion. I share these instances not to toot my own horn, but to suggest that when conservatives are intellectually confronted by principled opposition, they often fold. On the other hand, when they don’t even get a chance to talk, they get to play victim to a larger audience. Who’s afraid of shrill shills like Ann Coulter and Heather McDonald? Liberal and progressive students shouldn’t be. Odious conservatives like these should be protested in an orderly way, debated, and debunked. There is no way they should be prevented from speaking. There is nothing frightening about them or their ideas. When they talk, it becomes quite clear that they are wrong, misguided, and narrow-minded. But when they are silenced, their ideas take on an importance that they hardly deserve. By Julianne Malveaux, economist, author, and Founder of Economic Education GUEST COLUMINIST Julianne Malveaux Lucille Marie Williams Gadson

Upload: doantruc

Post on 28-Aug-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Chronicle6 - May 10, 2017 www.charlestonchronicle.net

When I was a kid – all those yearsago – we used a phrase, “makingfriends”, that referred to building re-lationships. Making friends was se-rious business. It meant you had abond, you cared about your friend,would support and defend yourfriend. People don’t make friendsanymore. They develop alliancesand have acquaintances. That’sokay because as the old folks wouldtell us, everyone ain’t gonna be yourfriend.

I thought of making friends theother day as I read the news storyabout folks at South Carolina StateUniversity who protested Gov.Henry McMaster being chosen togive the graduation speech. Itstruck me as odd. SCSU PresidentJames Clark addressed the protestnoting the imperiled institution hasto develop some diverse relation-ships. Yuh think???

Republicans in the state’s legisla-ture almost shut down the institu-tion a couple of years ago and wellmay be on their way to continuingthat process now! I‘d think the lastthing you’d want to do is tick off thetitular head of the legislature.Never mind that the guy is the gov-ernor! I don’t get the logic ofprotesting the governor making thegraduation speech at a state sup-ported school. That might be coolif SCSU had an alternative fundingsource, but you don’t bite the handthat feeds you.For years my old publisher, Jim

French, was incensed that the leg-islature never would name Interna-tional Longshoremen AssociationLocal 1422 President Kenny Rileyto the S.C. State Port Authorityboard. Jim, who by the way is athome these days resting as hisgrandsons man the day-to-day tasksof the newspaper’s operations, in-cessantly prodded me to write thestory. I never did. McMaster hasn’tchosen Riley for the authority ei-ther. I think Riley masterfully hasforged alliances and acquaintanceswhich alternatively benefit his con-stituents.

When it comes to making friends,you must be careful. “Be carefulwho your friends are”, my momused to caution. Her admonitionreminds me that you should keepyour friends close and your enemiescloser. There are those who see Re-publicans as enemies. Personally, Ithink that’s a mistake, but for thesake of argument, even if it were

ships nor alliances on the front end.The late John All, one of the besteditors I’ve ever known, said it’s eas-ier to start from scratch than to startover. That’s where building al-liances, if not friendships, becomeso important.

Last week as part of the U.S.Small Business Administration’sNational Small Business Week ac-tivities, the City of Charleston heldseveral events. Mayor John Teck-lenburg invited small business own-ers and their advocates to a roundtable discussion to talk about theirstrengths, challenges and opportu-nities for the city to help facilitatetheir success. Now, I’ve heardBlack business people over theyears say such events seldom yieldany business activity for them. Buttwo things come to my mind –you’ve got to be in it to win it andsomebody’s got to be at the table.I think the Tri-County Cradle toCareer Collaborative is another ofthose opportunities.

The five-year-old initiative bringsbusiness people together withschools to focus on educational out-comes. I was introduced to the con-cept when the former publicrelations woman came to the paper.I’ve always had some skepticismabout the initiative. First thing Iquestioned was why those folks allof a sudden were so gung-ho aboutpreparing our kids for jobs. Okay,so that was pretty much a no-brainer - the economic incentive isobvious. I also asked myself whythose folks were coming to theBlack Press. We’d been ignored inthe past. Then it dawned on me – Iwas asking stupid questions – takethe opportunity and run, dummy, Isaid to myself!I’ve always thought that the racism

and prejudice that prevented peo-ple from developing relationshipswhich benefit the participants wasillogical and that the barriers weput up which prevent our collectiveprogress are counterproductive. Itreally doesn’t matter where the helpcomes from as long as you get thehelp! If that help comes in the formof the Meeting Street Academy atBrentwood, the proposed Path-ways In Education school for at-risk teens or a commencementspeech by Gov. McMaster, so be it.But I think it may be to everyone’sadvantage to get together and buildsome alliances even if we don’tmake friends.

true, that means we should keepthem close. I think it makes goodsense to build relationships withyour adversaries. In that respect, Idon’t understand why more Blackfolks aren’t building relationshipswith the municipal administrationsin Charleston and NorthCharleston.On that note, I can’t figure why we

aren’t building more relationshipswith some of the people who dobusiness in our communities. It’seasy to tear stuff down; buildingsomething up is more difficult andcan be more rewarding. Some inthe Black community righteouslyare pitted against business ownerswho exploit our weaknesses. Well,the first thing is we have tostrengthen our weaknesses, but inthe meantime, maybe we should bebuilding some relationships withthose folks. We receive not becausewe ask not. Why should I do busi-ness with those who won’t recipro-cate the favor? Trust me, the riceain’t that good and we can buy beerand cigarettes anywhere.I’m old enough to remember when

the United States was adversarieswith dang near every nation thatwasn’t located in the northern hemi-sphere. Today the Japanese, Chi-nese and other foreign investorsown everything in Black communi-ties from the neighborhood conven-ience stores to the local motels. Onthe other side of the equation, thereare Burger King restaurants in Bei-jing. What’s it called – quid proquo, tit for tat? What part are wemissing?

It bothers me that few from ourcommunities are employed at theneighborhood Chinese restaurantor convenience store. But as NorthCharleston Branch NAACP Pres-ident Ed Bryant noted, other mer-chants also fail to reinvest in us. Hiscounterpart at the CharlestonBranch NAACP, Dot Scott,lamented it’s taken so long forBlack residents to mount an impas-sioned challenge the economic dy-namics that shape the retaileconomy of our communities andthat the challenge comes after thevideo recorded assault of a resident.National Action Network coordi-nator Elder James Johnson saidbringing that challenge to fruitionwon’t be easy, but the organiza-tion’s committed to that goal. Loftygoal I’d say when folks collectivelyhave worked neither to build friend-

Black to BLACKBy Barney Blakeney

Mother’s Day is a special timeset aside to recognize mothersnationally. And, if your motherhas passed away, it’s a time of re-flection. There is barely a daythat goes by that I don’t thinkabout my mother. Sometimes,it’s just the little things that popup during the day that set yourmind in motion.

Personally, I was never a oneday daughter. My mother wasmy world and we spent quite abit of time together, but there isjust something special about anational day of recognition formothers. Mother’s Day is a timefor me to reflect not only on mymother, grandmother and all myadoptive moms that have passedon but ladies that have been likea mother to me. I often think about my grand-

mother and summers spent withher on the farm. I thought aboutthe outhouse and the water-melon fields. I can still smell thearoma of the homecooked bis-cuits and cornbread baked on acast iron wood stove. And, evenmore memorable were the daysspent worshipping at the littleold potbellied wood stove familychurch. Even when I was out ofmy mother’s reach, my grand-mother was there. She madesure I went to Sunday Schooland church. That was non-nego-tiable. I am reminded of one ofgranny’s favorite songs she usedto sing in church-“Jesus Will FixIt For You.” (Pronounced- Jee-saws). Granny couldn’t carry a tune in

a bucket, and neither can I, butthat did not stop her from beinga one woman choir and it’s neverstopped me either. She wouldalways start a song sitting down.Then she would stand up andmake her way to the front of thechurch and by that time everyonewas standing on their feet joiningin the song. Despite all ofgranny’s ups and downs, I ad-mire her for being such a bold

By Beverly Gadson-Birch

WHO ASKED ME?

Death by tax cuts: The Republican health care planDonald Trump hosted a cele-

bration in the White HouseRose Garden for House Repub-licans after they passed theirparty’s health care plan by thethinnest of margins. They werecelebrating what Trump called a“win,” without any thought aboutconsequences.

None of them had read the bill,which was released only a coupleof days before the vote andrushed to the floor. The votetook place before the nonparti-san Congressional Budget Of-fice could issue a revisedassessment of its costs and ef-fects.

House leaders and Office ofManagement and Budget Direc-tor Mick Mulvaney dismissedcriticisms, saying that Senate Re-publicans planned to start all

over anyway. This bill addressesone-sixth of our national econ-omy, and an industry that hasbeen a leading source of jobsgrowth. Don’t worry, say HouseRepublicans, we just had to getthe win; forget about the sub-stance.

Americans shouldn’t just beworried; they should be furious.The Republican bill will throwliterally millions off health care,put people with pre-existing con-ditions at risk and raise premi-ums particularly for workersaged 50 to 64 — in order to givea massive tax break to the verywealthy.

At the annual shareholdersmeeting of Berkshire Hathaway,billionaire investor Warren Buf-fett called it for what it is: “a hugetax cut for guys like me.” The

richest 400 people in Americawill get a tax break estimated atabout $7 million a year. To payfor that, millions will lose theircoverage, and millions more —the elderly and those with pre-ex-isting conditions in various states— will see premiums soar and in-surance become unaffordable. You can’t sugarcoat this. It’s not

enough to say the Senate will fixit (the 13 white men — nowomen, no people of color — onthe Republican Senate Working

Group certainly will not). It’s notacceptable to say, “We don’tmean it; we just had to pass it.”

Why did they have to pass it?This is complicated, but if youfollow it, you can understand thebackroom plunder that is takingplace. As Peter Suderman ex-plained in the New York Times,Republicans have to pass it be-cause the top-end tax cuts in thehealth care bill are vital for theircentral goal: to deliver to theircorporate and wealthy donorsanother massive tax cut in thenext budget reconciliation vote.They have to do the tax cuts inwhat’s called “reconciliation” be-cause that allows them, underthe obscure rules of the Con-gress, to pass the bill with only 50votes — with only Republicanvotes.But the reconciliation rules only

allow tax cuts if they don’t raisedeficits after a 10-year window.So to get what Trump calls themother of all tax cuts, Republi-cans want to cut the taxes out ofObamacare in the FY2017 recon-ciliation (that only lasts until nextSeptember) and then have alower baseline for cutting taxesin the FY2018 reconciliation (thebudget that begins on October

1). Tax cuts for the wealthy willbe paid for by sickness and deathby millions of the uninsured.

Republican Sen. John McCaincriticizes the House for proceed-ing without a CBO estimate ofthe costs, saying, “I want to knowhow much it costs.” Republicansenators vow not to act until theCBO reports. The CBO’s esti-mate will show what we alreadyknow from its last estimate: Mil-lions will lose their insurance,and the wealthy will pocket mil-lions in tax cuts.

A former insurance executive,Richard Eskow, did the realmath. He took the best estimatesof how many avoidable deathscome from not having health in-surance with the rollback ofMedicaid and taking away pro-tections for pre-existing condi-tions. He compared that to thetax cuts that would be pocketedby the 400 richest Americans,people who, like Buffett, makeon average over $300 million ayear.

Here’s his estimate of the realcost: Ten people will die underthe Republican bill to give eachof the 400 richest people inAmerica a tax break. For every

person who dies, they’ll pocketabout $787,151. As Eskow noted,those rich beneficiaries aren’tlikely to know anyone who willlose his or her life as a result ofbeing stripped of health insur-ance. And while the $787,000isn’t much for a multimillionaire,it’s just the appetizer for the bigtake they will get out of theTrump tax cut plan that will fol-low.

Thirteen white, rich men willnow create the Republican planin the Senate. They’ll decide howmany millions to strip fromhealth insurance to pay for taxcuts many of them will enjoy.They’ll decide whether to de-prive low-wage women ofPlanned Parenthood’s healthcare services. They’ll decide justhow many deaths are needed tocover the tax cuts for the veryrich.

Ugly language? No this is amorally indefensible, ugly pieceof work.

It is simply obscene to chooseconsciously to condemn low-wage workers or older workersto unnecessary illness and deathin order to afford tax cuts for thealready wealthy.

DISCLAIMER: !e opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the various authors of editorials/opinions, etc. that appear in this publicationdo not necessarily re"ect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of !e Charleston Chronicle. LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Letters to the editor are welcome and encouraged. Submit your letter via e-mail [email protected]. Please include name, address, and daytime phone number for veri#cation purposes.

1111King Street, Charleston, SC 29403 • P.O. Box 20548843.723.2785 o!ce • 843.737.5443 fax

[email protected]

witness. I never heard her complain of what she didn’t have.She always appreciated what shehad. I got my “can’t carry a tunein a bucket from her”.

I knowmy l i m i t a -tions andsinging isone ofthem.

Mothersplay suchan impor-tant rolein a child’sde velo p-ment. A mother’s work is never done. Child rearing is noeasy feat by no stretch of theimagination. Mothers have beeninstrumental in shaping the livesof some of the greatest archi-tects, astronauts, physicians,mayors, presidents, preachers,teachers, artists, movers andshakers, etc., of this nation.

My mom had 10 children. Shewas in her forties when she foundout she was having twins. And,boy did she boo hoo cry, but theyturned out to be the joy of herlife. Being such a late bloomerwith the twins, Mother wouldpray the same prayer over andover that the Lord would let herlive to see the twins finish kinder-garten and then it was highschool.

After the twins graduated fromhigh school, then her prayerwent to “Lord, let me live to seethe twins get married”, followingthe twins getting married theprayer changed to seeing hergrandchildren grow up and thengreat grandchildren. Being thecut up that I was, I ribbed momabout her prayers. I said, “mom,you are running out of children,grandchildren and great grand-children. The Lord has gra-ciously extended your time and if

He kept on extending your time,you would be here until Jesuscomes and just be caught up inthe air”. We would laugh lov-ingly about her prayers but thetruth of the matter is mom’sprayers were answered. Y’all bet-ter watch out if you have a pray-ing mother. If y’all don’t knowwhat prayer can do, y’all betterask somebody.The strange thing about life is if

you live long enough you get tosee so much of your parents’qualities in yourself. The older Iget the more I act like my mom.Now, I find myself repeating thesame prayers as she did. My sonis grown; I pray constantly forhim. And now, like my mom, Iam working on my four-year-oldgrandson. Like my mom, mydaughter-in-law was a latebloomer. Y’all who know meknow that I am almost as old aswater, so y’all do the math! IfGod grants my petition to see mygrandson graduate from highschool, that’s not just “prayer an-swering” but a miracle. And, let’snot even think about my grand-son graduating from college. I,like mom, might as well waitaround and be “caught up in theair”.

What I miss most about momnot being here are the family din-ners. She was the glue that keptthe family together. All ten of herchildren would show up for din-ner with their children and shewould be beaming with joy likeshe was “queen for the day”.That’s why we celebrate moms.We celebrate the queens thatthey are. We celebrate theirmany sacrifices. We celebratetheir joys and their tears.

For every mother who may notfeel loved and appreciated, youare. Remember this! You don’thave to be a mother to motherchildren. Keep on doing whatyou do best and your rewardswill be many.

Happy Mother’s Day!!

GUEST COLUMINIST

By Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, Sr., Founder and President of theRainbow PUSH Coalition

The shrill conservative Ann Coulter has made headlines because the Uni-versity of California, Berkeley, wouldn’t let her speak at the end of April.Invited by college Republicans, her appearance threatened to incite vio-lence, as activists on the left and on the right prepared to either protest orsupport her appearance. In the end, the University cancelled her appear-ance, saying it could not guarantee her safety, which has the effect of pro-viding the notorious loudmouth an enlarged platform. National newsprograms have featured Coulter yammering about the anti-immigrationspeech she might have given. And credible, national newspapers like theNew York Times and the Washington Post have both covered the issueon its news pages, but also printed opinion pieces about the disturbingtrend of violent protests when conservative speakers – the Manhattan In-stitute’s Heather McDonald, and Bell Curve author and racist provocateurCharles Murray among them – are invited to campuses.

Who’s afraid of a shrill conservative? Liberalsshouldn’t be. Sure, people like Ann Coulter de-serve to be protested. But they also deserve to beheard. Protest can take many forms. Studentswho oppose the Coulter blather can peacefullygather outside a venue where she is speaking withpicket signs highlighting their points. They canpeacefully attend her lecture and attempt to askquestions after her lecture. They can take to com-munity forums – from radio and television to cam-pus newspapers, to articulate their opposition to her views. They can stage counter events – how about a pro-

immigration speaker scheduled at exactly thesame time as the Coulter lecture, where opposition attendance is exponentially larger than hers. Or, they can simplyignore her presence on campus.Cancelling her appearance gives her more exposure than she deserves. It

is also a form of censorship that cuts both ways. At Claremont McKennaCollege, police brutality defender Heather McDonald gave her talk vialive stream because college administrators feared violence if there was alarge audience. Protesters banged on the windows in the room where shegave her talk, making it difficult to hear her. How would those of us thatsupport the Black Lives Matter movement respond if BLM leaders weretreated the same way McDonald was? And aren’t BLM supporters ca-pable of responding to McDonald’s nonsense?Universities are supposed to be places where minds are opened and ideas

are exchanged. If provocative speakers can’t visit a university, who can?

Jesse Jackson

And where better to hear ideas, no matter how offensive, than at a univer-sity lecture or forum. I’d not like to have Heather McDonald or Ann Coul-ter as a commencement speaker. In a celebratory space it would bepositively offensive to have students of color be forced to share their bigday with those who would implicitly deny their very right to exist. But Isee no harm in having folks like McDonald, Coulter, or Murray speak oncampus. Indeed, it is perhaps most effective to have them debate some ofthose who disagree with them. I once had the pleasure of rebuttingCharles Murray after one of his Bell Curve talks. This happened morethan a decade ago, but I’d like to think I handed his words back to himwith aplomb. If the applause meter was any indication, I wiped the stagewith him. If my memory serves me right, Murray refused a one-on-one de-bate proposing, instead, that he would give his talk and I could rebut it.On another occasion, I was initially contracted to debate the anti-affirma-tive action activist Ward Connerly. He slithered out of the debate, andeven refused to appear on a panel with me. No matter. I used his printedwords as a basis for refuting his flawed arguments against affirmative ac-tion. I share these instances not to toot my own horn, but to suggest thatwhen conservatives are intellectually confronted by principled opposition,they often fold. On the other hand, when they don’t even get a chance totalk, they get to play victim to a larger audience.

Who’s afraid of shrill shills like Ann Coulter and Heather McDonald?Liberal and progressive students shouldn’t be. Odious conservatives likethese should be protested in an orderly way, debated, and debunked.There is no way they should be prevented from speaking. There is nothingfrightening about them or their ideas. When they talk, it becomes quiteclear that they are wrong, misguided, and narrow-minded. But when theyare silenced, their ideas take on an importance that they hardly deserve.

By Julianne Malveaux, economist, author, and Founder of Economic Education

GUEST COLUMINIST

Julianne Malveaux

Lucille Marie Williams Gadson