gs4.asg.uvn.swemits.esa.int/.../ad_2_gs4.asg.uvn.sw.00013_ssow.pdfdoc. no.: gs4.asg.uvn.sw.00013...

Doc. No.: GS4.ASG.UVN.SW.00013

Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN

S4-UVN Equipment Specific Statement of Work for the

FEE/FSE Page: 2

© Astrium GmbH — All rights reserved

Change Record

Issue Date Sheet Description of Change

1 15-02.2012 All 1st issue of document


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 3


Table of Contents

Change Record...................................................................................................................................2

Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................................3

1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................5

1.1 Scope of the document..........................................................................................................................5 1.2 Description of the FEE/FSE...................................................................................................................6 1.3 Contractor Task overview .....................................................................................................................7 1.4 Camera Bread-Board..............................................................................................................................7

2 Applicable & Reference Documents ..........................................................................................8

2.1 Project Applicable Documents .............................................................................................................8 2.2 Use of ECSS Standards .........................................................................................................................8 2.3 Reference Documents............................................................................................................................8

3 ABBREVIATIONS & TERMINOLOGY..........................................................................................9

3.1 List of Abbreviations..............................................................................................................................9 3.2 Definition of Terms.................................................................................................................................9

4 Engineering and Design............................................................................................................10

4.1 Design Analyses...................................................................................................................................10 4.2 Mathematical Models ...........................................................................................................................10 4.3 Software ................................................................................................................................................12 4.4 Calibration and Characterisation........................................................................................................12 4.5 Double Insulation Analysis and Design.............................................................................................12

5 Development and Qualification ................................................................................................18

5.1 Reviews and Milestone Planning........................................................................................................18 5.2 Model Philosophy.................................................................................................................................19 5.3 Spare Approach....................................................................................................................................19

6 Production Process Requirements..........................................................................................20

7 Verification .................................................................................................................................21

7.1 Specific Tests .......................................................................................................................................21 7.2 Verification Analysis ............................................................................................................................21 7.3 Verification Control Data .....................................................................................................................21 7.4 Documents subject to Verification Control .......................................................................................21

8 Delivery and Acceptance ..........................................................................................................23

8.1 Deliverable non-flight Models .............................................................................................................23 8.2 Flight Hardware ....................................................................................................................................23

8.2.1 Deliverable Flight Models ..............................................................................................................23 8.3 Ground Support Equipment ................................................................................................................24 8.4 Spare / Repair Kit..................................................................................................................................25 8.5 Embedded Software.............................................................................................................................26 8.6 Delivery Requirements ........................................................................................................................26

8.6.1 Packing ..........................................................................................................................................26 8.6.2 Storage ..........................................................................................................................................26 8.6.3 Transport........................................................................................................................................26

8.7 Customer Undertakings.......................................................................................................................26 8.7.1 Customer furnished Items..............................................................................................................26 8.7.2 Other Customer Undertakings.......................................................................................................27

9 Specific Requirements ..............................................................................................................28

9.1 Specific Services and Support............................................................................................................28 9.2 Specific Design Requirement..............................................................................................................28


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 4


ANNEX A: Amendment to Documents Requirements Description AD-11a ................................29


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 5


1 Introduction

1.1 Scope of the document

This document establishes the Specific Statement of Work (SSOW) for the supplier of the Front-End

Electronics (FEE) and the Front-End Support Electronics (FSE) and the internal Harness between FEEs and

FSE and the external Harness between FEE/FSE and OIM bracket (see Figure 1-1), which are defined by the

requirements specifications as mentioned in section 1.2., including all annexes and applicable documents.

The flexible harness between the detectors and the FEEs is considered as part of the FEE. The FEE for the

UVVIS and the NIR detector are identical with the exceptions stated in the Specification

Tasks that are not explicitly identified, but mandatory to achieve the FEE/FSE/Harness deliveries in time and

quality form an integral part of the contractual obligation. This document defines the tasks of the equipment

Supplier for:

The design, development, qualification, production, test and delivery of the equipment.

The provision of tooling, test and support equipment, support services and transportation services to

support spacecraft assembly, integration, test and launch, associated with the equipment operation and

handling,

The preparation and delivery of documentation.

This document is part of the Supply Contract between Astrium and the equipment Supplier. Hereinafter the

equipment Supplier is referenced as “the Supplier” and the Astrium as “the Customer”.

This document applies in conjunction with the "Generic Statement of Work for Supply of Equipments for S4 -

UVN Project” (GS4.ASG.UVN.SW.00008) referred to as the GSOW. The Generic Statement of Work amended

by this Specific Statement Of Work defines the work to be performed and the deliverable items in terms of

hardware, software, documentation, services and support for the supply of the FEE/FSE.

In the case of conflict with the Generic SOW, this Specific SOW shall have precedence. Tasks and

deliverables specified herein and in the Generic SOW are considered mandatory but not necessarily

exhaustive.

This Specific Statement of Work together with the Generic SOW with all its attachments and applicable

documents and standards will become part of the Contract between Astrium and the Supplier and all the

requirements therein are applicable to the work to be performed by the Subcontractor.

The requirements of this SSOW shall also be made applicable to the contractually specified Lower Level

Subcontractors/Suppliers, as pertinent to their work shares. Therefore the word "Supplier" shall be interpreted

as “Supplier and Lower Level Subcontractors/Suppliers”, if not specifically restricted by appropriate

formulations. Hardware and Software from other sources, such as OTS items, shall be procured according to

the equivalent technical, quality and safety related requirements.

Remark: for the FEE/FSE no phase E1 is requested as a baseline.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 6


1.2 Description of the FEE/FSE

The electronics in the Focal Plane Subsystem comprises the following elements:

FEE UV/VIS as specified in GS4.ASG.UVN.RS.00012 (including the Flex harness between the UV/VIS

Detector and the FEE)

FEE NIR as specified in GS4.ASG.UVN.RS.00012 (including the Flex harness between the NIR

Detector and the FEE)

FSE for UV/VIS and NIR as specified in GS4.ASG.UVN.RS.00013

Interconnecting Harness as specified in GS4.ASG.UVN.RS.00013

The two FEEs ( for UV/VIS and NIR respectively) are in charge of the detectors electrical conditioning and the

signal video processing up to the digitization. An additional unit referred as Front End Support Electronics

(FSE) encompasses all the functions that are not necessarily set close to the detectors:

.

Figure 1-1: Overview of FEE/FSE Electronics

A detailed description of the elements can be found in the specifications.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 7


1.3 Contractor Task overview

The contractor is responsible for the following tasks:

Designing of the UV/VIS FEE, NIR FEE, FSE and harnesses as shown in Figure 1-1

Providing all necessary analyses

Manufacturing and testing (performance, qualification, acceptance, any other specific test) of all items

Delivery of all required documentation

Acceptance and delivery of all Ground Support Equipment incl. FEE Simulator

AIT Support at Customer's premises (fine trimming of electronics on the various models)

Inputs for long term storage (adjustment procedure, contamination control re-commissioning, re-

validation)

All elements shall be delivered successfully qualified and tested according to the model philosophy.

The contractor shall perform a critical assessment of the requirements and shall identify cost driving

requirements.

1.4 Camera Bread-Board

At the moment of writing issue 1 of this SSOW, in the frame of Sentinel 4 , a Camera Bread-Board is

developed. It consists of bread-boards of the UVVIS FEE and NIR FEE and corresponding FSE, operating with

respective engineering grade detectors (UVVIS and NIR). In addition, an EGSE, which simulates the

Instrument Control Unit is part of this Camera BB. Dedicated Software is developed for the EGSE to be used

for the verification tests.

The detector can be operated at cold operational temperatures in a TV-chamber, whereby it is connected to

the FEE/FSE Bread-Board via a cable going through the shroud of the TV-Chamber.

As objective, the Camera Bread-Board is a test bed for the detectors and is also used to verify the

requirements of the UVVIS and NIR FEE in conjunction with the detector.

The schedule of the Camera Bread-Board is as follows:

- Kick-off: 01.01.2012

- Delivery of all hardware 19.06.2012

- Test campaign from 21.06.2012 until 18.07.2012

- Test Review Board 31.07.2012

The results of the Camera Bread-Board test campaign and associated documentation will be made available to

the finally selected FEE/FSE Supplier.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 8


2 Applicable & Reference Documents

2.1 Project Applicable Documents

The documents applicable to the required activities and deliverables as relevant for the specific tasks of the

Supplier of the UVN FEE/FSE are identified in the Contractual Baseline Document List (CBDL) ref.

GS4.ASG.UVN.LI.00033. The CBDL defines also the order of precedence of these documents.

2.2 Use of ECSS Standards

The supplier’s activities, processes and documentation shall be based on and respectively comply with ECSS

standards of issues and revisions as specified in this document and the Applicable Documents related to

technical, PA, and managerial requirements. For the Engineering Standards the tailoring is defined in AD-18.

2.3 Reference Documents

NA


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 9


3 ABBREVIATIONS & TERMINOLOGY

3.1 List of Abbreviations

See AD-26 and AD-26a of the applicable Contract Baseline Documents List..

3.2 Definition of Terms

General definition of terms is provided in the GSOW section 3.2.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 10


4 Engineering and Design

Further detailed requirements on equipment engineering and design are to be established during Phase B.

these requirements are applicable to the activities of the Contractor and his lower tier suppliers.

The contactor and his suppliers shall be flexible to this detailing of the requirements and to other requirement

adaptations which will result from the Customer work and from re-direction by the Agency in the usual scope of

a Phase B.

FEEFSE SSOW 0010

Neither the detailing nor the adaptations of requirements during Phase B until PDR of the affected equipment shall cause Class A contract changes by the Contractor or any of his lower tiers.

FEEFSE SSOW 0020

The set of MTG Support Specifications, tailored to the needs of S-4 UVN (listed in AD-1) are applicable to the work defined by this SoW. Updates to the MTG Support Specifications will be provided later by the Agency and forwarded to the Contractor by the Customer. The introduction of the updated Support Specifications, as well as subsequent updates of the requirement specifications of the equipment shall be accepted by the Contractor as being in scope of Phase B.

4.1 Design Analyses

FEEFSE SSOW 0030

Together with the analyses required in the Generic Statement of Work (GSOW), in the Document Requirement List (DRL) and in the CBDL the following analyses shall be provided by the Supplier to demonstrate suitability of the S-4 UVN mission

Worst Case Analysis (A)

Parts Derating Analysis (A)

Radiation Analysis (A)

Failure Mode Effects Analysis (A)

Reliability and Availability Prediction Report (A)

EMC Analysis (A)

Thermal Analysis (B)

Physical Properties Analysis (A)

Mechanical / Structural Analysis (B)

Analysis categorized (A) shall be provided as requested by the Customer for the respective reviews and updated as necessary to always reflect the latest HW and SW implementation.

Analysis categorized (B) shall be provided as requested by the Customer for the respective reviews and updated as necessary to always reflect the latest HW and SW implementation and shall be correlated with respective test results.

4.2 Mathematical Models

The mathematical models as specified in the DRL shall be provided by the Supplier


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 11


FEEFSE SSOW 0040

The Supplier shall undertake all necessary activities to establish and provide correlated mathematical models as requested in the applicable DRL and CBDL.

This includes for example performance of thermal balance testing.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 12


FEEFSE SSOW 0050

The supplier shall deliver correlated mathematical models according to Table 4-1.

Table 4-1: Mathematical Models

No. Item Notes Delivery Date Delivery location

1 CAD model Including all reference frames, material properties, …; Data file format: CatiaV5R19 and Step (see GSoW Annex A.1)

See DRL ASG Ottobrunn

2 Finite Element Model (FEM) see AD13 of CBDL See DRL ASG Ottobrunn

3 Thermal-Mathematical model (TMM)

see AD14 of CBDL See DRL ASG Ottobrunn

4 Geometrical-Mathematical model (GMM)


5 Reduced Thermal-Mathematical Model (RTMM)


4.3 Software

This section is not applicable.

4.4 Calibration and Characterisation

No dedicated SSOW requirements..

4.5 Double Insulation Analysis and Design

FEEFSE SSOW 0140

The equipment supplier is required to prepare a Double Insulation Analysis Report that will be kept up-to-date from EQSR until equipment closure MIP or TRR. This document shall analyse exhaustively the equipment compliance and shall present the solutions retained to comply to the double insulation requirements set forth in this chapter. This document shall be provided for review in accordance with the DRL and for each MIP.

. This document shall be prepared according to the following guidelines:

1. Identification of links (or equipotential) to be double insulated

All the interfaces and links requiring a double insulation at equipment level shall be clearly identified and listed. This concerns the following elements, where loss of single insulation would result in a SPF causing mission loss or degradation:

o All cross-strapped functions from source to load: whenever an internal or external electrical link or cross-strapping is common to prime and redundant functions, generating the risk of possible loss of both functions together (e.g. external secondary supplies, control and monitoring signals to/from secondary units, etc..)


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 13


The supplier shall identify the equipment internally cross-strapped signals The externally cross-strapped signals will be defined in the equipment specification by the

Prime

o Any element where insulation loss would result in electrical failure propagation Even in the case when power bus protection is outside the equipment, DI is required at

locations of power circuits where a loss of insulation could propagate failures to equipment redundant functions or to equipment external interfaces

If insulation loss, at a given place, can lead to failure propagation to equipment redundant functions or to its external interfaces, DI shall be implemented in this place Failure propagation stands for any kind of propagation, electrical (voltage, current), thermal, part blast, arcing, etc, where deratings can be exceeded

o Any element where nominal insulation might be damaged by radiations, thermo-elastic stresses, chemical product contamination, vibrations

Any element where loss of insulation would result in safety hazard for human operator shall be identified and listed.

For each identified interface and link, the double insulation shall then be verified from end to end, including connector, wires, PCBs, tracks, components, etc…

To give a clear overview, the areas to be double insulated shall be identified on circuit board diagrams and with photos.

All grounding paths shall be identified

The test connectors and their functions shall be reviewed and double insulation needs shall be addressed

2. Connectors

The pin allocation of each connector embedding a signal to be double insulated shall be given for information, especially if MDM connectors are used (due to the short distance between adjacent contacts)

The double insulation at connector rear level (inside the equipment) shall be described (eg if pins are soldered on PCB: non conductive coating loaded with filler material on pins from connector to PCB or sleeves covering all conductive areas of contact).

Photos of the connectors rear (in flight configuration ie potted for example) are required

3. PCB

Photos of the connectors rear (in flight configuration ie potted for example) are required

o adjacent tracks of the same layers or of different layers o tracks and a connection o adjacent connections o tracks or connections and any other metallic part (cover, screw, etc)

The PCB design rules shall be explained and compared with the applicable PCB requirements defined in [AD-34C]

The insulation tests performed at PCB level for qualification or for acceptance screening shall be detailed: e.g. defining voltage, duration, the exhaustiveness and combinatory of all the equipotentials tested wrt the others.

4. Coating

The type(s), typical thickness(es), and minimum thickness(es) of coating(s) used on PCB and on components shall be indicated as the coating ensures the insulation in case of internal particulate


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 14


contamination.

It shall also be mentioned if the coating is loaded with filler material or not.

If any, PCB areas (front or back) or components which are left uncoated shall be identified and it shall be verified that these locations do not require double insulation (pictures recommended).

5. Internal wires or harness

It shall be explained how the internal wires that require a double insulation are protected with regard to any other element at a differential voltage (ie components cases, mechanical parts like screws or equipment chassis…). Pictures are required.

6. Components to be double insulated

The double insulation at component level (diodes, transistors, relays, transformers, capacitors, resistors, etc …) shall be detailed with adequate schematics and/or pictures detailing the different insulation layers.

If diodes and transistors with metallic case are used, it shall be indicated whether the case is insulated wrt internal chipset or not.

The type and thickness of insulated bushes (for screws) shall be given.

The type and thickness of the insulation layer between the component and its support (metallic frame or PCB) shall also be indicated.

The insulation at components leads level shall also be verified, particularly for through hole leaded components.

The minimum distances between the components (or their leads) and the other elements at a different potential (mechanical elements, other components, PCB tracks) shall be assessed.

The double insulation wrt these elements is generally ensured by the coating applied at PCB level. The process used to keep a constant distance between components and leads and adjacent tracks shall also be explained (wedge used at component installation for example).

7. Equipment chassis and internal covers

If the equipment chassis and internal covers (if any) benefit from an insulating surface treatment (anodisation for example) or from a specific additional protection (local application of kapton tape for example), this information shall be indicated as far as this participates to the double insulation at equipment level.

8. Processes

The double insulation justification note shall also provide details on the processes (manufacturing and storage processes) that allow to ensure that no contamination / pollution of boards is possible before or during the application of coatings.

Note that many control points evidence difficulties of inspection but shall nevertheless be addressed:

o Varnish thickness control and adherence, especially on sharp edges or components through hole leads

o Pollution control inside connectors o Sealing o Air bubbles inside non transparent pottings

9. KIP/MIP inspection criteria

The aim of this Double Insulation Analysis Report is primarily to give guidance on the method by which justification of the compliance of the design to double insulation requirements is made.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 15


However, the verification methods (inspection, tests, specific tooling, etc..) put in place by the supplier at board and equipment levels, and corresponding acceptance criteria shall also be identified.

KIP/MIP inspection criteria shall be identified (ex: no air bubbles in the coating between 2 adjacent leads or pins, no particle, etc…).

10. Non Compliance identification

All Non Conformance to the double insulation rules and requirements shall be clearly identified and listed

The corresponding RFD/RFW shall be submitted to the customer for approval.

If double insulation implementation leads to get floating metallic parts (eg no bleeding possible), the exhaustive list of floating metallic parts shall be identified in the Double Insulation Analysis Report to evaluate the risks linked to deep charging effect.

For equipment design reviews (PDR/CDR):

To update the Double Insulation Analysis Report (ref. REQ-SOW 1) with design justification reports and compliance status that presents:

o The double insulation protection design solutions

o The exhaustive analysis of the equipment compliance to the double insulation requirements. To ensure that equipment design drawings indicate the areas where double insulation is needed

o The details of the double insulation protection manufacturing implementation as specified


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 16


FEEFSE SSOW 0150

The dedicated inspection and control checklists, related to the verification (KIP/MIP) of the double insulation

protection implementation along the manufacturing, shall be available (defined or correctly updated) with

agreed acceptance criteria and timing (before they cannot be seen any longer or before box closure).

It shall include specific manufacturing inspection (KIP) for the items that cannot be guaranteed by design or

manufacturing process like:

flexible cover

uncontrolled application of potting. It is mandatory to be able to control and guarantee a minimum thickness of varnish or potting in areas like sharp metallic edges or at the lead end of components at the back of PCBs. This can be ensured for example by use of loaded varnish.

risk of pinched wire

ill-defined wire runs

bubbles in potting inspection (bubbles especially forbidden in areas where voltage >12 V and current source capability > 3A)

wire in contact with metallic piece and risk of wear out

This Double Insulation Analysis Report (stand alone document) as defined per [REQ-SOW 1] shall be

submitted to Astrium for approval.

Verification during equipment manufacturing and assembly:

As Astrium quality inspectors cannot be physically and permanently present during the

equipment manufacturing, delegation may be given to the supplier for inspections and

controls of the implementation of the double insulation protections.

FEEFSE SSOW 0160

Therefore, all potential critical areas shall be properly controlled during manufacturing by:

Inspections (KIP/MIP all along manufacturing flow, specific tests may be required by some final customers.

Pictures shall be taken and transmitted immediately for Astrium approval.

FEEFSE SSOW 0170

In case of modification, made on the equipment, impacting areas where double insulation is applied, the

Double Insulation Analysis Report (including compliance, impact on manufacturing implementation and

MIP/KIPs) shall be updated accordingly. The embodied changes shall be controlled at MRR or by NRB if

occurring during manufacturing.

FEEFSE SSOW 0180

Need of improving / updating MIP inspection with unexpected or missing topics (Lessons Learned) has to be

transmitted together with the MIP report for Astrium approval.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 17


FEEFSE SSOW 0190

FEEFSE SSOW 0200

As the equipment design and manufacturing processes progress, the equipment supplier shall provide

information and shall record and give evidence with photos that the proper double insulation protections have

been implemented as necessary and at the appropriate stage. These information shall form the inputs for the

final update of the Double Insulation Analysis Report and for the Verification and Control Document (VCD) to

be prepared by the supplier.

For recurring equipments, the same verification plan during the manufacturing phase is mandatory to ensure

that no process or workmanship quality drift occurs.

To verify that the applicable process and requirements are exhaustively applied, a Verification and Control

(VCD) process aiming at generating systematically a justification document within the MIP to provide evidence

to Astrium that double insulation protection has been correctly implemented and inspected (see VCD

requirements) all along the equipment manufacturing phase from manufacturing release until MIP before

closure or before TRR. The VCD document shall be completed at MIP by the Astrium quality inspector.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 18


5 Development and Qualification

The development and qualification shall be performed according to the applicable documents and ESA standards written in the CBDL.

FEEFSE SSOW 0201

In case of an ASIC/FPGA development the Supplier shall include a dedicated development and review plan already in his proposal and maintain it throughout the project (also refer to the Documents Requirement List).

FEEFSE SSOW 0205

The Supplier shall analyze the requirements in the FEE and FSE requirement specifications concerning the FEE/FSE internal interfaces between FEE and FSE. Based on his foreseen design concept, he shall propose areas of potential harmonization. The results shall be addressed in a dedicated customer review typically one month after KO.

5.1 Reviews and Milestone Planning

FEEFSE SSOW 0210

The planning constraints and boundary conditions to the reviews and milestones as identified in Table 5-1 shall be met.

Table 5-1: Reviews and Milestone Planning.

Equipment Review / Milestone

Planning Constraint Boundary Date

Kick Off (KO) June 2012 (tbc)

EQSR Within 1 month after KO July 2012 (tbc)

PDR 5 months after KO November 2012 (tbc)

CDR Before MRR of FEE/FSE QM tbd by supplier

QR After completion of qualification testing tbd by supplier

Final AR1 After final acceptance of FM1 FEE/FSE

hw as per contract According to contract

Final AR2 After final acceptance of FM2 FEE/FSE

hw as per contract

According to contract


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 19


The required equipment reviews will be confirmed by the Customer after the EQSR.

The content of the respective equipment review data packages will be provided by the Customer together with the review procedure in due time before the respective review.

Any ASIC / FPGA development shall be aligned with the equipment development for EQSR and shall comply

with ECSS-Q-ST-60-02C.

5.2 Model Philosophy

The purpose of the FEE/FSE model philosophy is:

to ensure that the Supplier will provide the instrument prime with a qualified self-standing equipment to support the instrument-level and satellite-level model philosophy and AIT.

FEEFSE SSOW 0220

The Supplier shall foresee to implement development models in addition to the deliverable models as necessary under consideration of the equipment’s development category and technological readiness level. The model philosophy and test approach defined by the Supplier shall be consistent with the maturity of the proposed solutions and relevant techniques and in line with instrument-level and satellite-level model philosophy.

5.3 Spare Approach

See section 8.4.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 20


6 Production Process Requirements

See CBDL applicable documentation.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 21


7 Verification

7.1 Specific Tests

FEEFSE SSOW 0275

The Supplier shall foresee, plan and execute all tests necessary to demonstrate complete close-out of applicable requirements. Any specific tests i.e. tests that are not per se part of bread board, engineering model, qualification or acceptance testing shall be identified at equipment PDR.

7.2 Verification Analysis

FEEFSE SSOW 0276

The Supplier shall foresee, plan and execute any particular analysis necessary to demonstrate complete close-out of applicable requirements. Any particular analysis in addition to those already specified shall be identified at equipment PDR.

The thermal and mechanical analysis tools as specified in Annex A of the GSOW shall be used.

7.3 Verification Control Data

FEEFSE SSOW 0277

The Supplier shall provide the verification control data in accordance with the applicable requirements. The exact exchange format as well as exchange of working copies will be defined by the Customer.

For verification control data exchange either DOORS or another agreed electronic format (e.g. MS Excel) shall

be foreseen.

7.4 Documents subject to Verification Control

FEEFSE SSOW 0278

The following documents are subject to Verification Control and shall be traced in accordance with the existing requirements by the Supplier:


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 22


Document Reference

FEE/FSE Requirement Specification GS4.ASG.UVN.RS.00013

MTG General Design and Interface Specification MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0353

MTG Satellite Electrical Design Requirements Specification MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0167

MTG Mechanical and Thermal Design Requirements Specification MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0166

MTG Satellite Environmental Design and Tests Requirements Specification

MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0174

MTG EMC Design Requirement Specification MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0168

MTG EGSE General Design Requirements MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0177


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 23


8 Delivery and Acceptance

8.1 Deliverable non-flight Models

Further to the contract and the GSOW, the following specific Acceptance Requirement apply.

FEEFSE SSOW 0279

The Supplier shall deliver the non-flight models after successful completion of the respective test campaign

FEEFSE SSOW 0280

The delivery dates and location of the non-flight models are defined in Table 8-1.

Table 8-1: Non-flight Models Delivery Dates and Locations

Model Delivery Date Delivery Location

UV-VIS FEE EM 01.07.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

NIR FEE EM 01.07.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

FSE EM 01.07.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

Harness EM 01.07.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

UV-VIS FEE QM 15.08.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

NIR FEE QM 15.08.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

FSE QM 15.08.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

Harness QM 15.08.2013 ASG, Ottobrunn

Spare/repair kit 01.02.2015 TBD

Delivery Address(es): refer to the contract

The content of the respective data packages for delivery related reviews i.e. MRR, TRR, TRB and DRB shall

be compliant with the DRL and shall be agreed with the Customer in due time before the respective review,

whereby the Customer shall provide the review procedure.

FEEFSE SSOW 0290

The Supplier shall include bolts, washers and interface filler in the delivery of the non-flight models

8.2 Flight Hardware

8.2.1 Deliverable Flight Models

Further to the contract and the GSOW, the following specific Acceptance Requirement apply

FEEFSE SSOW 0295

The Supplier shall deliver the flight models after successful completion of the respective test campaign


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 24


FEEFSE SSOW 0300

The delivery dates and location of the flight models are defined in Table 8-2.

Table 8-2: Flight Model Delivery Dates and Locations

Model Delivery Date Delivery Location

1 UV-VIS FEE FM 1 01.08.2014 ASG, Ottobrunn

1 NIR FEE FM 1 01.08.2014 ASGOttobrunn

1 FPS FM1 01.08.2014 ASG, Ottobrunn

Harness FM1 01.08.2014 ASG, Ottobrunn

1 UV-VIS FEE FM 2 01.02.2015 ASG, Ottobrunn

1 NIR FEE FM 2 01.02.2015 ASG, Ottobrunn

1 FPS FM2 01.02.2015 ASG, Ottobrunn

Harness FM2 01.02.2015 ASG, Ottobrunn

Delivery Address(es): refer to the contract

The content of the respective data packages for delivery related reviews i.e. MRR, TRR, TRB and DRB shall

be compliant with the DRL and shall be agreed with the Customer in due time before the respective review,

whereby the Customer shall provide the review procedure.

FEEFSE SSOW 0310

The Supplier shall include bolts, washers and interface filter in the delivery of the flight models

8.3 Ground Support Equipment

FEEFSE SSOW 0320

The deliverable ground support equipment is compiled in Table 8-3.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 25


Table 8-3: Ground Support Equipment (GSE)

No. Item Qty Notes Delivery Date Delivery location

1 Reusable Transport and Storage Containers for EM/QM elements

2 According to equipment According to equipment

2 Transport Container for FM 1 elements


3 Transport Container for FM 2 elements


4 ESD Protective caps for connectors

For each model According to equipment According to equipment

5 Set of connector savers 2 Only for the QM and FM1 delivery sets

According to equipment According to equipment

6 Cleaning tools for cleaning the non-optical surfaces

For each FM

According to FMs According to equipment

7 Integration HW (Shims, washers, Nuts, Bolts, etc..)

For each model According to equipment According to equipment

8 FPS Test Harness 2 With EM According to equipment

9 Unit Tester 1 With EM According to equipment

10 FEE Data Simulator 1 For tests with ICU March 2013 According to equipment

FEEFSE SSOW 0330

The Supplier shall deliver one stand alone FEE Data Simulator for test of the interfaces and functions of the FEE following equipment, especially the digital data processing part of the ICU (specified in FEE specification)

FEEFSE SSOW 0340

All transport containers shall be reusable and designed for air, land and ship transport.

FEEFSE SSOW 0350

All specific S/W tools are deliverable items.

8.4 Spare / Repair Kit

FEEFSE SSOW 0355

The Supplier shall implement a spare/repair/attrition philosophy with spare/repair kits to guarantee the program schedule constraints during both integration and testing phase. The sections. 5.1.10 and 5.1.11 of the GSOW are applicable.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 26


FEEFSE SSOW 0356

The Supplier shall deliver a spare/repair kit for all FEE/FSE elements together with the second flight models (FM2).

8.5 Embedded Software

Software as part of the FEE/FSE shall be avoided. Functionality shall be implemented in hardware. Any

implementation of software has to be agreed with the Customer.

8.6 Delivery Requirements

8.6.1 Packing

Refer to applicable requirements in GSOW.

8.6.2 Storage

Refer to applicable requirements in GSOW.

8.6.3 Transport

Refer to AD-99 of the applicable Contract Baseline Documents List.

8.7 Customer Undertakings

8.7.1 Customer furnished Items

The items as compiled in

Table 8-4 will be furnished by the customer. For the first design the customer will provide the items as listed in

the table below

No. Item Notes Number Delivery Date

Delivery location

1 Engineering grade UV-VIS detector (CCD)

Detector characteristics are described in the Requirement specification

1 tbd

2 Engineering grade NIR detector (CCD)


1 tbd

No. Item Notes Number Delivery Date

Delivery location

1 Engineering grade UV-VIS detector (CCD)


1 tbd

2 Engineering grade NIR detector (CCD)


1 tbd


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 27


Table 8-4: Customer Furnished Items

FEEFSE SSOW 0360

The Supplier shall use the engineering grade UV-VIS detector for the acceptance tests of the UV-VIS FEE non-flight and flight models and the engineering grade NIR detector for the acceptance tests of the NIR FEE non-flight _and flight models.

8.7.2 Other Customer Undertakings

This paragraph is not applicable.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 28


9 Specific Requirements

9.1 Specific Services and Support

FEEFSE SSOW 0370

The Supplier shall support the electrical adjustment of the FEE/FSE for optimization of the flight detector

performance after integration at the Customer's premises on time and material basis.

FEEFSE SSOW 0380

On Customer request the Supplier shall provide support for the AIT campaign. This support shall be done on time and material basis.

9.2 Specific Design Requirement

The final interface design decision between the ICU and the FEE is not yet taken. The supplier is requested to

contribute to the design trade-off. Therefore the following requirements apply:

FEEFSE SSOW 0390

The interface between ICU & FEE shall be offered in the proposal in both variants i.e. as SpaceWire link and

as ChannelLink.

FEEFSE SSOW 0400

The Contractor shall evaluate the design alternatives for the ICU & FEE interface regarding design, implementation, qualification, cost and schedule aspects for both interface variants The preferred interface variant shall be duly justified.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 29


ANNEX A: Amendment to Documents Requirements Description AD-11a

This section is not applicable.


Issue: 1

Date: 15.02.2012

Sentinel 4 / UVN


FEE/FSE Page: 30


---------------- END OF DOCUMENT -------------