growing leaders opportunity. engagement. achievement. romero jalomo, vp student affairs lori...

GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. www.hartnell.edu

Romero Jalomo, VP Student AffairsLori Kildal, VP Academic AffairsBrian Lofman, Dean, Institutional Planning and EffectivenessWillard Lewallen, Superintendent/President

Strategic Plan Progress Report: Student Access & Student Success

December 4, 2014


STRATEGIC PLAN 2013-2018

Approved on October 1, 2013, Hartnell’s Strategic Plan is Scheduled for Completion in Spring 2018.

6 PRIORITIES:1. Student Access2. Student Success3. Employee Diversity and Development4. Effective Utilization of Resources5. Innovation and Relevance for Programs and

Services6. Partnerships with Industry, Business, Agencies,

and Education


STRATEGIC PLAN 2013-2018

11 GOALS:• Key Level for Evaluating Overall Progress• Each Initiative Included in Long Term Plans,

Comprehensive Plans, and Annual Plans is Linked to One or More Strategic Plan Goals

38 OUTCOMES:• Level for Evaluating Different Components of a

Particular Goal

OVER 100 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs):• Level for Assessing Specific Measures


STRATEGIC PRIORITY 1STUDENT ACCESS

Goal 1A

Hartnell College will provide higher education, workforce development, and lifelong learning opportunities - with seamless pathways - to all of the college's present and prospective constituent individuals and groups.



Outcome 1A.1 Increase the first time student, recent high school graduate enrollment rate from service area high schools and maintain the rates at or above the California Community College statewide average.



KPI 1A.1a

Greenfield

Evere

tt Alvarez

North Sa

linas

Gonzalez

Soled

adAlisa

l

Overal

l Dist

rict

King City

Statew

ide Rate

Salin

as

N. Monter

ey County

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

52.6%

48.1%

41.3% 41.1% 40.1% 39.2% 38.5%

33.0% 32.0% 31.5%

8.2%

Participation Rates of High School Graduates



KPI 1A.1a 2014-2015

High School Attending Hartnell Fall 2014**

Attended# of HS

Graduates # Enrolled

% of Graduates attending Hartnell

Attending Full-Time

Attending Less Than Full Time

Alisal 475 186 39.16% 144 42

Everett Alvarez 445 214 48.09% 161 53

Gonzales 168 69 41.07% 50 19

Greenfield * 171 90 52.63% 67 23

King City * 188 62 32.98% 44 18

Mt. Toro Cont. 17 8 9

N. Monterey Co. * 220 18 8.18% 10 8

North Salinas 390 161 41.28% 115 46Salinas 448 141 31.47% 107 34

Soledad 269 108 40.15% 70 38Salinas Adult School 1 1 0 Totals 2,774 1,067 38.46% 777 290



Outcome 1A.2 Increase the enrollment rate for adults 18 years and older for all communities within the District and maintain the rates at or above the California Community College statewide average.



KPI 1A.2a

Chualar

Statewide Rate

Gonzalez

Salinas

King City

Greenfield

San Luca

s

Spreckels

Overall Dist

rict R

ate

Castroville

San Ardo

Soledad

Prunedale

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0107.1

82.072.3 70.1

64.5 63.954.5 54.2 52.6

42.6

32.3 31.0

14.4

Adult Participation Rates (per 1,000)



Outcome 1A.3Increase enrollment rates for historically underrepresented students.


STRATEGIC PRIORITY 2STUDENT SUCCESS

KPI 1A.3a Enrollment rates by ethnicity

Africa

n Americ

an

American In

dian/Alask

an Native

Asian

Pacific I

slander

Hispanic

Unknown/Multi-eth

nicity

White

, Non-H

ispanic

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

2.5%

0.5% 2.3% 3.8%

72.8

%

5.4% 12

.8%

2.7%

0.3% 4.

4%

3.5%

74.7

%

2.3%

16.3

%

Representation of Ethnic Groups - Hartnell and District

HARTNELL COLLEGE - FALL 2014 DISTRICT POPULATION - CENSUS 2010



Outcome 1A.4Provide an inviting, welcoming, and supportive campus atmosphere for all student groups.



Goal 2AHartnell College will provide a supportive, innovative, and collaborative learning environment to help students pursue and achieve educational success.



Outcome 2A.1 Hartnell College will improve its level of student engagement.



Outcome 2A.2 Systematically assess and, when necessary, revise Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs).



KPI 2A.2a Completion of SLO assessments and revisions

Baseline Actual Target

71% of offered courses assessed



75% of academic programs assessed



100% of core competencies assessed





KPI 2A.2b Completion of SAO assessments and revisions

Baseline Actual Target44% of outcomes assessed

44% 100% of SAOs assessed



KPI 2A.2b Completion of SAO assessments and revisions



Outcome 2A.3 By 2017-18, Hartnell College will be at or above the statewide average for all student success measures on the California Community College Chancellor's Office “Student Success Scorecard”



KPI 2A.3a

Remedial:Math

Remedial: English

Remedial: ESL Persistence: Unprepared

30 Units: Unprepared

Degree/Transfer:

Unprepared

Career Technical Education

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

31.8

%

43.6

%

11.7

%

63.7

%

67.2

%

39.4

% 46.2

%

30.6

%

43.6

%

27.1

%

70.1

%

65.3

%

40.5

%

53.9

%

Student Success Scorecard Measures2007-08 to 2012-13 cohort

Baseline

Target: Statewide Avgs



Goal 2B: Hartnell College will provide a supportive, innovative, and collaborative learning environment that addresses and meets the diverse learning needs of students.



Outcome 2B.1 By academic year 2017-2018, Hartnell College will achieve approximately equal success rates for ethnic/racial groups and for gender.



KPI 2B.1a

Course Retention Course Success0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

84.9

%

72.4

%83.9

%

70.5

%

68.0

%

58.0

%

Course Retention and Success Rates - Gender (Fall 2013)

FemaleMaleBenchmark (80% rule)



KPI 2B.1a

Africa

n American

American

Indian/A

laska

n Nati

veAsia

n

Hispanic

Multi

-eth

nicity

Pacific I

slander

Unknown/

White

, Non-H

ispan

ic

Benchmark

(80% ru

le)0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

82.5

%

82.0

%

90.4

%

83.0

%

81.5

%

94.8

%

89.7

%

87.8

%

76.0

%

Course Retention Rates by Ethnicity - Fall 2013

Course Retention Rate

Benchmark 76%



KPI 2B.1a

Africa

n Americ

an

American In

dian/Alask

an Native

Asian

Hispanic

Multi-eth

nicity

Pacific I

slander

Unknown

White

, Non-H

ispanic

Benchmark

(80% ru

le)0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%67

.4%

67.2

%

81.0

%

68.5

%

67.6

%

80.5

%

82.6

%

80.6

%

66.0

%

Course Success Rates by Ethnicity - Fall 2013

Course Success

Benchmark 66%



KPI 1A.3a

Female Male0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%49

.2%

50.8

%

66.9

%

33.1

%

Degrees Awarded by Gender 2013-14

Student PopulationDegrees Awarded



KPI 1A.3a

Africa

n Americ

an

American In

dian/Alask

an Native

Asian

Hispanic

Pacific I

slander

Unknown/Multi-eth

nicity

White

, Non-H

ispanic

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

1.8%

0.5% 5.

0%

74.4

%

0.5% 5.

3% 11.5

%

2.5%

0.5% 2.3%

72.8

%

3.8% 5.4% 12

.8%

Degrees Awarded by Ethnicity 2013-14

Degrees AwardedStudent Population



Outcome 2B.2 By academic year 2017-2018, Hartnell College will be at or above national benchmarks for measures of student engagement.



KPI 2B.2a Results of the CCSSE

Active and Colla

borative Le

arning

Student E

ffort

Academic

Challenge

Student-F

aculty

Inte

racti

on

Support fo

r Learn

ers45.0

46.0

47.0

48.0

49.0

50.0

51.0

52.0

53.0

50.1

49.6 50

.4

47.6

52.5

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

Results of the CCSSE Spring 2014

Hartnell BaselineNational Benchmark



KPI 2B.2b Results of the SENSE

Effective Tra

ck to

College Readiness

Engaged Learn

ing

Academic

and Social S

upport Netw

ork

Early Connecti

ons

High Expecta

tions and A

spira

tions

Clear Aca

demic Plan and Path

way0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.050.055.060.0

55.9

47.1

44.7 47

.6

42.3

39.1

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

Results of the SENSE

BaselineNational Benchmark



KPI 2B.2b Results of the SENSE Baseline Actual TargetEffective Track to College Readiness

Engaged LearningAcademic and Social Support Network

Early ConnectionsHigh Expectations and AspirationsClear Academic Plan and Pathway

ASPECTS OF LOWEST STUDENT ENGAGEMENTAn advisor helped me to select a course of study, program, or major

An advisor helped me to identify the courses I needed to take during my first semester/quarter

Discussed an assignment or grade with an instructorUsed writing, math, or other skill lab

Used computer labASPECTS OF HIGHEST STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning Worked with other students on a project or assignment during class

Worked with classmates outside of class on class projects or assignments

Participated in a required study group outside of classUsed an electronic tool to communicate with another student about

coursework

55.947.144.742.342.239.1

46.3%51.2%

52.7%20.0%34.9%

76.9%82.0%40.3%

21.0%76.8%

55.947.144.742.342.239.1

46.3%51.2%

52.7%20.0%34.9%

76.9%82.0%40.3%

21.0%76.8%

505050505050

62.2%72.3%

67.1%35.8%53.4%

71.7%78.6%34.4%

17.3%57.1%


THANKS FOR LISTENING & CARING!

QUESTIONS&

COMMENTS

growing leaders opportunity. engagement. achievement. romero jalomo, vp student affairs lori...

Documents

strategic priority

student accesskpi

student accessoutcome

time student

student accessgoal

strategic plan goals

hartnells strategic

vp student affairslori