group e1: helena chia, pey-hua hwang, gregory padilla, cameron wheeler
DESCRIPTION
Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler. Choosing the Design & Making the Molds. Things we had to consider: Consensus Performance Aesthetics Time constraints Difficulties we encountered: Tool Limitations Draft Angles. Red Base. UCL=2.000” - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Group E1:
Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang,
Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler
![Page 2: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Choosing the Design &
Making the Molds
Things we had to consider:
Consensus
Performance
Aesthetics
Time constraints
Difficulties we encountered:
Tool Limitations
Draft Angles
![Page 3: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Red BaseRed Base Shewhart Chart
1.995
1.996
1.997
1.998
1.999
2
2.001
2.002
2.003
0 5 10 15 20 25
Run Num ber
Av
era
ge
(o
f 5
sa
mp
le)
dia
me
ters
[i
nc
he
s]
• UCL=2.000”• LCL=1.997”• Cp=4.767
• Range=0.04”
0
5
10
15
20
25
Inches
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
rts
![Page 4: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Black Cover
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Inches
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
rts
• UCL=2.004”• LCL=1.99”• Cp=1.303
• Range=0.04”
Black Cover Shewhart Chart
1.98
1.985
1.99
1.995
2
2.005
2.01
0 5 10 15 20 25
Run Num ber
Ave
rag
e (o
f 5
sam
ple
) d
iam
eter
s [i
nch
es]
![Page 5: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Thermoform Insert
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Inches
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
rts
• UCL=1.324”• LCL=1.302”• Cp=1.02
Therm oform Insert Run Chart
1.29
1.295
1.3
1.305
1.31
1.315
1.32
1.325
1.33
1.335
0 50 100 150
Parts Num ber
Crit
ial
Dim
en
sio
n [
Inc
he
s]
1.02
![Page 6: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What would we have done differently?
• Alternative method/design of creating thermoform windows
• Additional complexity of designs (ie injector pins)
What if there were no rules?• Different design without thermoform part
• Tried to break machines, play with pressure profiles, incorporate “mistakes” into design
![Page 7: Group E1: Helena Chia, Pey-Hua Hwang, Gregory Padilla, Cameron Wheeler](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072016/5681316c550346895d97e3da/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Dave and Patrick,
THANK YOU!