grf expenditures by category, 1995 - 2006

21
1 © Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2 CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60601 direct: 312.332.1049 Email: [email protected] Pensions and the State Budget Prepared by: Ralph Martire Executive Director Thursday, May 17, 2007; 9:30 am – 10:30 am “Pensions Issues” Illinois Association of School Board Officials 56 th Annual Conference Peoria Civic Center 201 SW Jefferson St., Peoria, Illinois 61602

Upload: giulio

Post on 02-Feb-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street  Suite 1700   Chicago, Illinois 60601  direct: 312.332.1049  Email: [email protected] Pensions and the State Budget Prepared by: Ralph Martire Executive Director Thursday, May 17, 2007; 9:30 am – 10:30 am - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

1

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700  Chicago, Illinois 60601 direct: 312.332.1049 Email: [email protected]

Pensions and the State BudgetPrepared by:

Ralph MartireExecutive Director

Thursday, May 17, 2007; 9:30 am – 10:30 am“Pensions Issues”

Illinois Association of School Board Officials56th Annual Conference

Peoria Civic Center201 SW Jefferson St., Peoria, Illinois 61602

Page 2: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

2

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

FY 2007 Appropriations by Agency as a Percent of GRF TOTAL GRF: $25.76 Billion

Illinois State Board of Education

25.4%

Higher Education8.4%

Human Services15.5%

Children and Family Services

3.0%Health Care

30.7%

Corrections4.4%

Other3.9%

Pensions3.9%

Natural Resources0.3%

Administration4.4%

Environmental Protection Agency

0.005%

Agrilculture0.2%

-ISBE and Higher Ed does not include pension contributions-Pension contributions include FY 2007 GRF appropriated-Health Care includes Public Health and Health Care and Family Services-Administration includes all boards, commissions, agencies, authorities, districts, councils, OMB, Revenue, CMS, Inspector General and all legislative, constitutional and judical offices

Page 3: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

3

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

Category FY 1995 Actual

FY 1995 CPI Adjusted to FY2006 FY 2006 Enacted

$ Difference Between 1995 Adj'd for CPI & 2006 Enacted

FY 1995 ECI Adjusted to FY2006

$ Difference Between 1995 Adj'd for ECI & 2006 Enacted

GRF $17,302.0 $22,613.7 $24,406.4 $1,792.7 $24,776.5 -$370.1

Education $3,656.0 $4,778.4 $6,123.0 $1,344.6 $5,235.4 $887.6

Health Care $4,319.0 $5,644.9 $7,034.0 $1,389.1 $6,184.8 $849.2

Pension $519.0 $678.3 $938.4 $260.1 $743.2 $195.2

GRF without Health Care and Pensions $12,464.0 $16,290.4 $16,434.0 $143.6 $17,848.4 -$1,414.4

GRF without Health Care and Pensions and Education $8,808.0 $11,512.1 $10,311.0 -$1,201.1 $12,613.1 -$2,302.1

**Notes: Health care includes Medicaid and state employee health insurance

Sources: State of Illinois' Traditional Budgetary Financial Reports and Fiscal Focus Illinois' FY2006 Budget National Association of State Budget Officers Comptroller Fiscal Focus, January 1997

CPI and ECI based on Bureau of Labor Statistics

Page 4: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

4

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Comparison of State Retirement System Debt

$29.6

$7.2

$40.9

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

Illinois Ohio National Average

Deb

t ($

in b

illio

ns)

*Ohio Debt and National Average Debt Based on the 2004 Wilshire Report, the latest national data available. At the release of the report, Illinois debt w as $43.1 billion. The current debt of $40.9 billion is based on the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability, Report on the 90% Funding Target of Public Act 88-05932004 and the FY 2006 and FY 2007 Pension Holiday.

Page 5: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

5

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Figure 3: 2004 Funded Ratio and Share of Debt of the Five Illinois Retirement Systems [1]

2004 TRS SERS SURS GARS JRS State Total

Funded Ratio 59.7% 51.8% 64.7% 45.1% 38.7% 58.9%

Share of Unfunded Liability (Debt) $23.01 $9.78 $7.29 $0.689 $0.131 $40.9

[1] Ibid – FY 2004 numbers reported by the Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability adjusted to cover the impact of the Pension Holiday taken for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007, under P.A. 94-0004.

Page 6: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

6

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

2004 Funded Ratio Comparison of Nation's Public Retirement Systems: National Average vs. Illinois

58.9%

83.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

National Average Illinois

Source: Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability. Illinois funded ratio is the FY 2006 reported number adjusted to account for the Pension Holidays in FY 2006 and FY 2007. The national average is based on the 2005 Wilshire Report on State Retirement Agencies, the latest national data available.

Page 7: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

7

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Comparable State & Local Government Annual Retirement Benefits

$19,848$17,928 $17,568 $17,112

13,788 12,884

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

Avera

ge A

nn

ual

Paym

en

ts

Page 8: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

8

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

$17,112$16,488

$10,000

$11,000

$12,000

$13,000

$14,000

$15,000

$16,000

$17,000

$18,000

$19,000

$20,000

National Average Illinois

Av

era

ge

An

nu

al P

ay

me

nts

Average State & Local Government Employment Annual Retirement Benefits

Page 9: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

9

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Participants in the Illinois Pension Plans

TRS SURS SERS JRS GARS Total

Active Members 250,540 153,475 89,735 947 265 494,962

Beneficiaries 85,153 41,638 54,678 912 395 182,776

Totals 335,693 195,113 144,413 1,859 6,600 677,738

Percent of Total IL Population 5.3%

Page 10: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

10

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

FY07 Normal Costs of the Five Illinois Retirement Systems

Normal CostPercent of

Payroll

JRS $32,200,000 23.47%

GARS $2,400,000 19.42%

SERS $329,000,000 9.17%

SURS $319,584,000 10.82%

TRS $650,835,074 8.20%

Total $1,334,019,074

Total Weighted Average 9.13%

Page 11: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

11

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

FY 2006 and 2007 Pension Holiday

$2,117.2

$2,507.8

$938.4

$1,374.7

$0.0

$500.0

$1,000.0

$1,500.0

$2,000.0

$2,500.0

$3,000.0

2006 2007

Amount Owed

Amount Paid

Page 12: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

12

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Required Yearly Pension Payments Post Pension Holiday: FY 2006 - FY 2045

$0

$2,000,000,000

$4,000,000,000

$6,000,000,000

$8,000,000,000

$10,000,000,000

$12,000,000,000

$14,000,000,000

$16,000,000,000

$18,000,000,00020

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

1520

1620

1720

1820

1920

2020

2120

2220

2320

2420

2520

2620

2720

2820

2920

3020

3120

3220

3320

3420

3520

3620

3720

3820

3920

4020

4120

4220

4320

4420

45

Page 13: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

13

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Because of Illinois constitutional restraints, switching to a defined contribution system does not and cannot reduce the state's current $40.7 billion unfunded liability. The sole way to cover this liability is to design a rational program that does not back load costs like current law.

Defined contribution systems have significantly higher annual administrative costs than fully funded defined benefit systems. If Illinois moved to a defined contribution system for all current participants in the five Illinois state pension systems, that change would cost taxpayers from $275 million to $610 million per year in additional administrative costs.

If contribution rates remained the same, defined contribution systems can be expected to generate significantly lower retirement benefits. For example, when Nebraska switched to a defined contribution system, the average benefit was only $11,230 per year compared to $16,797 per year under the defined benefit system.

Defined Contribution Myths

Page 14: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

14

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Defined Contribution Myths

Defined contribution systems have the advantage of creating fiscal discipline that is absent from a defined benefit system. Due to their construction, defined contribution systems would force the state to make the required employer contribution into the employees account on a per pay period basis, rather than offering promises of future benefits, as under the current defined benefit system. From an employee's perspective, a defined contribution system would have two advantages over a defined benefit system: (i) the benefits would be portable from job to job; and (ii) an employee could access his or her defined contribution account for emergencies pre-retirement (although subject to tax penalties, in certain situations).

The three main disadvantages of a defined contribution system are: (i) reduced and uncertain retirement benefits; (ii) lesser investment returns; and (iii) market risks.

On balance, when funded in a fiscally responsible manner, a defined benefit system permits the public sector to provide its workers with better retirement benefits at lower overall cost to taxpayers.

Page 15: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

15

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

$24,000

$29,000

$34,000

$39,000

$44,000

$49,000

$ i

n M

illi

on

s

Revenues

Expenditures

The Illinois Structural Deficit(How Revenue Growth will not Keep

Pace with the Cost of Current Services)

Page 16: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

16

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Growth in State Issued Revenue and

General Obligation Bond Debt: 2000-2006

$7.684$8.444

$9.543

$20.812$21.809 $22.241

$22.820

$0.000

$5.000

$10.000

$15.000

$20.000

$25.000

2000 2001 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 17: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

17

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

• Since 2000, the percentage of general fund revenues going to pay off debt has risen from under 4% to over 7% of total revenues. That means almost $2 billion of all general funds WENT to paying off debt and interest in the last, complete Fiscal Year (2006) instead of going to fund public services.

Page 18: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

18

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

General Obligation and State-Issued Revenue Debt

as a Percentage of General Fund Revenues

3.83%4.02%

4.42%4.73%

6.06%

6.40%

7.08%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 19: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

19

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Debt Comparisons: Illinois v. Other States

• Illinois has more total debt than only two other states, California and New York.

• In 2004, Moody’s reported Illinois owned 7.5% of the total national debt.

• The National Association of State Budget Officers report that when per capita debt is more than $1,200, as is Illinois, it becomes unmanageable for the state.

• Illinois has more than double debt per capita than the national average.

Page 20: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

20

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

Tax-Supported Debt Per Capita:

Illinois Ranks 6th Nationally in Debt Per Capita

which is More Than Double the National Average

$2,019

$999

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

Illinois National Average

Page 21: GRF Expenditures by Category, 1995 - 2006

21

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2007

• Illinois also ranks high nationally when comparing tax-supported debt as a percentage of personal income. Again, the state has almost double the national average.

• Moody’s rates Illinois lower than 30 states in its credit rating. Thirteen states rank similar to Illinois and three are given credit ratings lower than Illinois.