gregory e. harrington - nfpa.org e. harrington 06/03/2016 saf-mea david s. collins chair the preview...
TRANSCRIPT
AGENDA NFPA Technical Committee on Means of Egress NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meeting
Monday, June 20, 2016
Hilton Fort Lauderdale Marina
Fort Lauderdale, FL
1. Call to order. Call meeting to order by Chair David Collins at 8:00 a.m. on June 20,
2016 at the Hilton Fort Lauderdale Marina, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
2. Introduction of committee members and guests. For a current committee roster, see page 2.
3. Approval of July 27-28, 2015 first draft meeting minutes. See page 7.
4. The process – staff PowerPoint presentation. See page 11.
5. Emergency stair travel device task group report – Jake Pauls, TG Chair.
6. Exit and exit discharge task group report – Mike Crowley, TG Chair.
7. Vertical openings task group report – David Collins, TG Chair.
8. Horizontally sliding accordion doors (101-7.2.1.14) for enclosing exit stairs task group report – Rita Guest, TG Chair.
9. NFPA 101 Second Draft preparation. a. For Public Comments, see page 28. b. For Committee Inputs, see page 71.
10. NFPA 5000 Second Draft preparation. a. For Public Comments, see page 84. b. For Committee Inputs, see page 117.
11. Other business.
12. Future meetings.
13. Adjournment.
Enclosures
Page 1 of 120
Address List No PhoneMeans of Egress SAF-MEA
Safety to Life
Gregory E. Harrington06/03/2016
SAF-MEA
David S. Collins
ChairThe Preview Group, Inc.632 Race StreetCincinnati, OH 45202American Institute of Architects
SE 3/4/2009SAF-MEA
Gregory E. Harrington
Secretary (Staff-Nonvoting)National Fire Protection Association1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471
2/3/2016
SAF-MEA
Ryan Alles
PrincipalHigh Rise Escape Systems, Inc.209 Meadow Beauty TerraceSanford, FL 32771The Safe Evacuation CoalitionAlternate: Jonathan Shimshoni
M 7/26/2007SAF-MEA
Charles A. Badeau
PrincipalLiberty Mutual InsuranceRisk Control Services62 Maple Avenue, MS 209Keene, NH 03431
I 03/03/2014
SAF-MEA
Charles V. Barlow
PrincipalEverGlow NA, Inc.1122 Industrial DrivePO Box 830Matthews, NC 28106-0830
M 4/14/2005SAF-MEA
Warren D. Bonisch
PrincipalAon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation1701 North Collins Blvd., Suite 235Richardson, TX 75080Alternate: William J. Burrus
I 7/1/1995
SAF-MEA
Kenneth E. Bush
PrincipalMaryland State Fire Marshals Office301 Bay Street, Lower LevelEaston, MD 21601-2721International Fire Marshals AssociationAlternate: R. T. Leicht
E 1/1/1987SAF-MEA
Mark Chan
PrincipalBay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)System Safety Department300 Lakeside DriveOakland, CA 94612
U 04/05/2016
SAF-MEA
Michael A. Crowley
PrincipalJENSEN HUGHES8827 West Sam Houston ParkwayNorthSuite 150Houston, TX 77040-5399Alternate: Brian T. Rhodes
SE 1/15/2004SAF-MEA
Richard L. Day
PrincipalMichigan State Fire Marshal's Office207 Jackson StreetAllegan, MI 49010-9156
E 07/29/2013
SAF-MEA
David A. de Vries
PrincipalFiretech Engineering Inc.8140 Monticello AvenueSkokie, IL 60076-3326Alternate: Joshua W. Elvove
SE 7/1/1993SAF-MEA
Steven Di Pilla
PrincipalESIS Health, Safety & Environmental436 Walnut StreetPhiladephia, PA 19106American Society of Safety Engineers
I 7/1/1994
1Page 2 of 120
Address List No PhoneMeans of Egress SAF-MEA
Safety to Life
Gregory E. Harrington06/03/2016
SAF-MEA
Paul L. Dove
PrincipalCity of Coldwater Fire Department57 Division StreetColdwater, MI 49036Michigan Fire Inspectors SocietyAlternate: Brian Batten
E 10/18/2011SAF-MEA
David W. Frable
PrincipalUS General Services AdministrationPublic Buildings Service665 Green Meadow LaneGeneva, IL 60134
U 1/1/1991
SAF-MEA
Rita C. Guest
PrincipalCarson Guest, Inc.1776 Peachtree Street NW, Suite 120Atlanta, GA 30309-2306American Society of Interior Designers
U 7/20/2000SAF-MEA
Bryan Lawrence Hoskins
PrincipalOklahoma State University499 Cordell SouthStillwater, OK 74078Alternate: Virginia R. Charter
SE 10/23/2013
SAF-MEA
Xianxu (Sherri) Hu
PrincipalVerisk Analytics/Insurance Services Office, Inc.545 Washington Boulevard, 18-9Jersey City, NJ 07310-1607
I 04/05/2016SAF-MEA
Waymon Jackson
PrincipalUniversity of Texas at Austin1 University Station, Stop C2600PO Box 7729Austin, TX 78713Alternate: Josh Lambert
U 7/23/2008
SAF-MEA
Gary Lampella
PrincipalNational Association of Home Builders (NAHB)1201 15th Street NWWashington, DC 20005National Association of Home BuildersAlternate: Daniel Buuck
U 04/05/2016SAF-MEA
James K. Lathrop
PrincipalKoffel Associates, Inc.81 Pennsylvania AvenueNiantic, CT 06357Alternate: William E. Koffel
SE 1/1/1992
SAF-MEA
Brian A. Marcyjanik
PrincipalUS Department of Veterans Affairs229 Wyncrest DriveButler, PA 16001-1795US Department of Veterans Affairs
U 04/05/2016SAF-MEA
Gary L. Nuschler
PrincipalOtis Elevator Company5 Farm Springs RoadFarmington, CT 06032-2575National Elevator Industry Inc.Alternate: Kevin L. Brinkman
M 4/15/2004
SAF-MEA
Denise L. Pappas
PrincipalValcom, Inc.5614 Hollins RoadRoanoke, VA 24019-5056National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationAlternate: Andrew G. Berezowski
M 7/26/2007SAF-MEA
Jake Pauls
PrincipalJake Pauls Consulting Services255 Glenlake Avenue, Suite 2207Toronto, ON M6P 1G2 CanadaAmerican Public Health AssociationAlternate: Stanley C. Harbuck
C 1/1/1977
2Page 3 of 120
Address List No PhoneMeans of Egress SAF-MEA
Safety to Life
Gregory E. Harrington06/03/2016
SAF-MEA
Richard D. Peacock
PrincipalUS National Institute of Standards & TechnologyEngineering Laboratory100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8664Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8664
RT 03/21/2006SAF-MEA
Robert R. Perry
PrincipalRobert Perry Associates Inc.470 Waubonsee CircleOswego, IL 60543Door and Hardware Institute
M 7/22/1999
SAF-MEA
Vincent Quinterno
PrincipalRhode Island State Fire Marshal’s Office1 Capitol HillProvidence, RI 02908Alternate: Wade Palazini
E 10/18/2011SAF-MEA
Kenneth Saks
PrincipalUS National Institutes of Health502 Hillsboro DriveSilver Spring, MD 20902-3131
U 10/23/2013
SAF-MEA
Roy W. Schwarzenberg
PrincipalUS Central Intelligence Agency6148 Fieldcrest DriveFrederick, MD 21701Alternate: Kelly R. Tilton
U 7/1/1993SAF-MEA
Michael S. Shulman
PrincipalUL LLC455 East Trimble RoadSan Jose, CA 95131-1230Alternate: Jon G. Roberts
RT 1/15/1999
SAF-MEA
J. Francois Simard
PrincipalCirque Du Soleil8400 2E AvenueMontreal, QC H1Z 4M6 Canada
IM 08/11/2014SAF-MEA
Michael Tierney
PrincipalKellen Company18 Hebron RoadBolton, CT 06043Builders Hardware Manufacturers AssociationAlternate: John Woestman
M 1/12/2000
SAF-MEA
Joseph H. Versteeg
PrincipalVersteeg Associates86 University DriveTorrington, CT 06790
SE 1/1/1990SAF-MEA
Brian Batten
AlternateFerndale Fire Department1635 Livernois StreetFerndale, MI 48220Michigan Fire Inspectors SocietyPrincipal: Paul L. Dove
E 10/28/2014
SAF-MEA
Andrew G. Berezowski
AlternateHoneywell Inc.12 Clintonville RoadNorthford, CT 06472-1610National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationPrincipal: Denise L. Pappas
M 04/08/2015SAF-MEA
Kevin L. Brinkman
AlternateNational Elevator Industry, Inc.925 West Center StreetEureka, IL 61530-9505Principal: Gary L. Nuschler
M 08/17/2015
3Page 4 of 120
Address List No PhoneMeans of Egress SAF-MEA
Safety to Life
Gregory E. Harrington06/03/2016
SAF-MEA
William J. Burrus
AlternateAon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation700 East Sonterra Blvd., Suite 1212San Antonio, TX 78258Principal: Warren D. Bonisch
I 10/29/2012SAF-MEA
Daniel Buuck
AlternateNational Association of Home Builders1201 15th Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-2800National Association of Home BuildersPrincipal: Gary Lampella
U 03/03/2014
SAF-MEA
Virginia R. Charter
AlternateOklahoma State University499 Cordell SouthStillwater, OK 74078-8016Principal: Bryan Lawrence Hoskins
SE 12/08/2015SAF-MEA
Joshua W. Elvove
Alternate3478 South Cimarron WayAurora, CO 80014-3912Principal: David A. de Vries
SE 1/1/1990
SAF-MEA
Stanley C. Harbuck
AlternateSchool of Building InspectionPO Box 1643Salt Lake City, UT 84110American Public Health AssociationPrincipal: Jake Pauls
C 08/17/2015SAF-MEA
William E. Koffel
AlternateKoffel Associates, Inc.8815 Centre Park Drive, Suite 200Columbia, MD 21045-2107Principal: James K. Lathrop
SE 1/1/1992
SAF-MEA
Josh Lambert
AlternateUniversity of Texas at Austin304 East 24th Street, Suite 202ADMail Code C2600Austin, TX 78712Principal: Waymon Jackson
U 07/29/2013SAF-MEA
R. T. Leicht
AlternateState of DelawareOffice of State Fire Marshal4 Drummond DriveWilmington, DE 19808International Fire Marshals AssociationPrincipal: Kenneth E. Bush
E 7/20/2000
SAF-MEA
Wade Palazini
AlternateRhode Island State Fire Marshal’s Office1 Capitol HillProvidence, RI 02908Principal: Vincent Quinterno
E 10/29/2012SAF-MEA
Brian T. Rhodes
AlternateJENSEN HUGHES3610 Commerce Drive, Suite 817Baltimore, MD 21227-1640Principal: Michael A. Crowley
SE 4/3/2003
SAF-MEA
Jon G. Roberts
AlternateUL LLC6608 North Western Avenue, #280Oklahoma City, OK 73116-7326Principal: Michael S. Shulman
RT 08/17/2015SAF-MEA
Jonathan Shimshoni
AlternateEscape Rescue Systems Ltd.David Hamelek 7Tel-Aviv, 64953 IsraelThe Safe Evacuation CoalitionPrincipal: Ryan Alles
M 3/1/2011
4Page 5 of 120
Address List No PhoneMeans of Egress SAF-MEA
Safety to Life
Gregory E. Harrington06/03/2016
SAF-MEA
Kelly R. Tilton
AlternateUS Central Intelligence Agency15160 Winesap DriveNorth Potomac, MD 20878Principal: Roy W. Schwarzenberg
U 01/10/2008SAF-MEA
John Woestman
AlternateKellen Company808 North York Street, Box 989Monroe, IA 50170-0989Builders Hardware Manufacturers AssociationPrincipal: Michael Tierney
M 8/5/2009
SAF-MEA
Pichaya Chantranuwat
Nonvoting MemberFusion Consultants Co. Ltd/Thailand81/55 Soi Phumijit, Rama 4 RoadPrakanong, KlontoeyBangkok, 10110 Thailand
SE 1/18/2001SAF-MEA
William R. Hamilton
Nonvoting MemberUS Department of LaborOccupational Safety & Health Administration200 Constitution Ave. NW, Room N3609Washington, DC 20210
E 3/4/2009
SAF-MEA
Gregory E. Harrington
Staff LiaisonNational Fire Protection Association1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471
2/3/2016
5Page 6 of 120
NFPA 101/5000 TC ON MEANS OF EGRESS FIRST DRAFT MEETING MINUTES 1
MINUTES NFPA Technical Committee on Means of Egress NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 First Draft Meeting
July 27-28, 2015
InterContinental Milwaukee
Milwaukee, WI
1. Call to order. The meeting called to order by Chair David Collins at 8:00 a.m. on July
27, 2015 at the InterContinental Milwaukee Hotel, Milwaukee, WI.
2. Self-Introductions. Self-introductions were made by committee members and guests.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT
NAME COMPANY David Collins, Chair The Preview Group, Inc.
Rep.: American Institute of Architects
Ron Cote, Secretary National Fire Protection Association
Ryan Alles, Principal High Rise Escape Systems, Inc.
Rep.: The Safe Evacuation Coalition
Charles Badeau, Principal Liberty Mutual Insurance
Charles Barlow, Principal EverGlow NA, Inc.
Brian Batten, Alt. to Paul Dove Ferndale Fire Department
Rep.: Michigan Fire Inspectors Society
Andrew Berezowski, Alt. to Denise
Pappas
Honeywell Inc.
Rep.: National Electrical Manufacturers
Association
Warren Bonisch, Principal Aon Fire Protection Engineering
Kenneth Bush, Principal Maryland State Fire Marshals Office
Rep.: International Fire Marshals
Association
Daniel Buuck, Principal National Association of Home Builders
Michael Crowley, Principal JENSEN HUGHES
David de Vries, Principal Firetech Engineering Inc.
David Frable, Principal US General Services Administration
Rita Guest, Principal Carson Guest, Inc.
Rep.: American Society of Interior
Designers
Bryan Hoskins, Principal Oklahoma State University
Page 7 of 120
NFPA 101/5000 TC ON MEANS OF EGRESS FIRST DRAFT MEETING MINUTES 2
Waymon Jackson, Principal University of Texas at Austin
William Koffel, Alt. to James Lathrop Koffel Associates, Inc.
James Lathrop, Principal Koffel Associates, Inc.
Gary Nuschler, Principal Otis Elevator Company
Rep.: National Elevator Industry Inc.
Denise Pappas, Principal Valcom, Inc.
Rep.: National Electrical Manufacturers
Association
Jake Pauls, Principal Jake Pauls Consulting Services
Rep.: American Public Health Association
Robert Perry, Principal Robert Perry Associates Inc.
Rep.: Door and Hardware Institute
Vincent Quinterno, Principal Rhode Island State Fire Marshal’s Office
Kenneth Saks, Principal US National Institutes of Health
Roy Schwarzenberg, Principal US Central Intelligence Agency
Michael Shulman, Principal Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Francois J. Simard, Principal Cirque Du Soleil
Michael Tierney, Principal Kellen Company
Rep.: Builders Hardware Manufacturers
Association
Nathan Vander Roest, Principal US Architect of the Capitol
Joseph Versteeg, Principal Versteeg Associates
John Woestman, Alt. to Michael Tierney Kellen Company
Rep.: Builders Hardware Manufacturers
Association
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS NOT PRESENT
NAME COMPANY Richard Day, Principal Michigan State Fire Marshal’s Office
Steven Di Pilla, Principal ESIS Global Risk Control Services
Richard Peacock, Voting Alternate NIST
GUESTS
NAME COMPANY
Kevin Brinkman National Elevator Industry, Inc.
William Hall Portland Cement Association
Wayne Hamit Salamandera Zone
Gregory Harrington National Fire Protection Association
Steve Orlowski Building Owners & Managers Association
James Rickard P3 Consulting
James Smith American Wood Council
Page 8 of 120
NFPA 101/5000 TC ON MEANS OF EGRESS FIRST DRAFT MEETING MINUTES 3
3. Approval of May 20-21, 2013 second draft meeting minutes. The minutes were
approved as distributed.
4. The process – staff PowerPoint presentation. Staff explained the revision schedule and
particulars for committee actions at the First Draft meeting via the slides included in the
agenda.
5. Correlating committee minutes with direction for 2018 editions. The committee
reviewed the subject areas raised by the NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Correlating
Committees. A task group was formed to address emergency stair travel devices for a future meeting. Emergency stair travel devices task group: Jake Pauls – Chair, Ryan Alles, Bryan
Hoskins, Steve Orlowski, and Vinny Quinterno.
6. Hazardous materials task group report. The Public Inputs, submitted by the task
group, were accepted as First Revisions (FR).
7. Elevator machine room sprinklers task group. The task group was discharged.
8. Exit and exit discharge task group. The task group, consisting of Mike Crowley –
Chair, Charles Barlow, Dave Collins, Paul Dove, Stephen Orlowski, Vincent Quinterno
and Joe Versteeg, was retained on agenda.
9. Vertical openings task group. A Committee Input (CI) was prepared to permit the
committee to return to the subject during Second Draft preparation. The task group,
consisting of Dave Collins – Chair, Charles Barlow, Warren Bonisch, Josh Elvove, and
Josh Lambert, was retained on agenda.
10. Horizontally sliding accordion doors (101-7.2.1.14) for enclosing exit stairs task group. A Committee Input (CI) was prepared to permit the committee to return to the
subject during Second Draft preparation. The task group, consisting of Rita Guest –
Chair, Brian Batten/Paul Dove, Bob Perry, and Vincent Quinterno was retained on
agenda.
11. School security workshop. Workshop report noted as received. No action taken in
advance of occupancy chapter committee meetings.
12. NFPA 5000 annexes errors. First Revision (FR) prepared to address the subject.
13. Exit Stair Path Markings. First Revision (FR) prepared to address the subject.
14. Handrails one side only. First Revision (FR) prepared to address the subject.
15. Headroom on stair landings. First Revision (FR) prepared to address the subject.
16. Horizontal exit capacity and number. First Revision (FR) prepared to address the
subject.
Page 9 of 120
NFPA 101/5000 TC ON MEANS OF EGRESS FIRST DRAFT MEETING MINUTES 4
17. Stair identification sign visibility. First Revision (FR) prepared to address the subject.
18. NEC door unlatching and opening direction. First Revision (FR) prepared to address
the subject.
19. NFPA 101 First Draft preparation. All NFPA 101 Public Inputs (PI) were addressed.
First Revisions (FR) and Committee Inputs (CI) were prepared as needed.
20. NFPA 5000 First Draft preparation. All NFPA 5000 Public Inputs (PI) were addressed.
First Revisions (FR) and Committee Inputs (CI) were prepared as needed.
21. Future meetings. The committee will need to meet for Second Draft preparation
approximately the third week of June 2016 along with other core chapter committees.
22. Adjournment. On July 27, the meeting was adjourned at 5:55 p.m. On July 28, the
meeting was reconvened at 7:55 a.m. and adjourned at 11:40 a.m.
Page 10 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
1
© National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA 101® & NFPA 5000 ®
Second Draft MeetingsCore Chapter Committees
June 20-23, 2016 - Fort Lauderdale, Florida
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
At this and all NFPA committee meetings we are concerned with your safety.
If the fire alarm sounds, please proceed to an exit.
2
Page 11 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
2
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
3
Members, please verify/update your contact information.
Use of visual or audio recording devices capable of reproducing verbatim transcriptions of this or any NFPA meeting is not permitted.
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Sign in and identify affiliations
Participation Requested 7 days prior to the meeting, or
At the discretion of the Chair
Guest chairs are located around the room
Equal opportunity granted to opposing views
4
Guests
Page 12 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
3
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Members categorized in ANY interest category who have been retained to represent the interests of ANOTHER interest category (with respect to a specific issue or issues that are to be addressed by a TC/CC) shall declare those interests to the committee and refrain from voting on any Public Input, Comment, or other matter relating to those issues throughout the process.
5
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Follow Robert’s Rules of Order
Discussion requires a motion
6
General Procedures
Page 13 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
4
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Not in order when another has the floor
Requires a second
This motion is not debatable and DOES NOT automatically stop debate
A 2/3 affirmative vote immediately closes debate and returns to the original motion on the floor
Fewer then 2/3 allows debate to continue
7
Motions for Ending Debate, Previous Question, or “Call the Question”
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Member addresses the chair
Receives recognition from the chair
Introduces the motion
Another member seconds the motion
8
Committee member actions
Page 14 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
5
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft MeetingTimeline: Annual 2017 Revision Cycle
Comment Stage (Second Draft):Public Comment Closing Date: May 16, 2016Second Draft Meetings: June 20-23 and July 18-22, 2016Posting of Second Draft for Balloting Date: September 5, 2016Posting of Second Draft for NITMAM: January 16, 2017
Tech Session Preparation:NITMAM Closing Date: February 20, 2017NITMAM /CAM Posting Date: April 17, 2017NFPA Annual Meeting: June 4-7, 2017
Standards Council Issuance:Issuance of Documents with CAM: August 10, 2017
9
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Resolving Public Comments
Committee Action and Committee Statement
Creating Second Revisions
10
Technical Committee Actions
Page 15 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
6
11
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Committee develops a Committee Action Accept
Reject but see…
Reject
Reject but Hold
(See Regs §4.4.8.1)
12
Resolving Public Comments
Page 16 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
7
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Committee must clearly indicate reasons for not accepting the recommendation and/or point to a relevant Second Revision
All Public Comment actions must have a Committee Statement
Must include a valid technical reason
13
Committee Statements
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
No vague references to “intent”
Explain how the submitter’s substantiation is inadequate
Neither Public Comment actions nor Committee Statements get balloted
14
Committee Statements (continued)
Page 17 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
8
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
No “new material” after the Public Input Stage since it is not subject to public review
What constitutes “new material” is decided by the TC or Correlating Committee
Adding “new material” at the Comments Stage could successfully be challenged through appeal to the NFPA Standards Council
15
New Material
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Voting during meeting is used to establish a sense of agreement (simple majority)
Secured by letter ballot (≥2/3 agreement)
Only the results of the formal ballot determine the official position of the committee on the Second Draft
16
Formal Voting
Page 18 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
9
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Second Revisions (SRs) ONLY• Public Comment actions and Committee Statements not balloted
• Reference materials are available
Second Draft, Public Comments, First Draft Report
Allowed vote: • Affirmative on all SRs
• Affirmative on all SRs with exceptions specifically noted
Ballot form provides a column for affirmative with comment• Note: This box only needs to be checked if there is an accompanying comment
Reject or abstain requires a reason17
Ballots
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Initial ballot
Circulation of negatives and comments
Members may change votes during circulation
Second Revision that fails letter ballot is designated as a Committee Comment in the Second Draft Report, marked as “Reject,” and not included in the Second Draft
18
Circulation
Page 19 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
10
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
• If a Second Revision fails ballot and the subject text was a result of a First Draft change, a Supplementary Ballot is issued
• Supplementary Ballot asks TC if it still favors the First Revision change reported in the First Draft
• If yes, same change appears as a Second Revision and is included in the Second Draft
• If no, the change appears as a Committee Comment and the text reverts to previous edition
• See Regs §4.4.10.2.119
Failed Second Revisions
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Ballots are issued and submitted online
Alternates are strongly encouraged to return ballots
Ballot session will time out after 90 minutes
Use “submit” button to save your work
20
Electronic Balloting
Page 20 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
11
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
21
Click link on the ballot email
Sign in with NFPA.org Committee Login and Password
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
22
Select either ‘Affirmative All’ or ‘Affirmative with Exception(s)’
Page 21 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
12
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
Use “See FR/SR - #” link to review all First/Second Revisions
Use “Edit election” to change individual votes or to modify vote after submitting ballot
23
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
NFPA Second Draft Meeting
24
To complete ballot click Participant Consent and Submit
Return and edit any votes before ballot due date.
Page 22 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
13
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Legal
25
Antitrust Matters
It is the policy of the NFPA to strictly comply with state and federal antitrust laws.
NFPA expects all participants in its standards development activities to conduct themselves in strict accordance with these laws.
It is the obligation of each participant to read and understand NFPA’s Antitrust Policy. (You can access this policy at nfpa.org/regs.)
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Legal
26
Antitrust Matters (cont’d)
Participants must avoid any conduct, conversation or agreement that would constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade.Conversation topics that are off limits include:
•Profit, margin, or cost data;•Prices, rates, or fees;•Selection, division or allocation of sales territories, markets or customers;•Refusal to deal with a specific business entity.
Page 23 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
14
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Legal
27
Antitrust Matters (cont’d)NFPA’s standards development activities are based on openness, honesty, fairness and balance.Participants must adhere to the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards and the Guide for the Conduct of Participants in the NFPA Standards Development Process. (You can access the Regulations and Guideat nfpa.org/regs.)Follow guidance and direction from your employer or other organization you may represent.Be sure to ask questions if you have them.
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Legal
28
Manner is which standards development activity is conducted can be important.The Guide requires standards development activity to be conducted with openness, honesty and in good faith.Participants are not entitled to speak on behalf of NFPA.Participants must take appropriate steps to ensure their statements whether written or oral and regardless of the setting, are portrayed as personal opinions, not the position of NFPA.Be sure to ask questions if you have them.
Antitrust Matters (cont’d)
Page 24 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
15
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Legal
29
Patents
Disclosures of essential patent claims should be made by the patent holder.Patent disclosures should be made early in the process.Others may also notify NFPA if they believe that a proposed or existing NFPA standard includes an essential patent claim.NFPA has adopted and follows ANSI’s Patent Policy. It is the obligation of each participant to read and understand NFPA’s Patent Policy. (You can access this policy at nfpa.org/regs.)
TC Struggles with an Issue
• TC needs data on a new technology or emerging issue
• Two opposing views on an issue with no real data
• Data presented is not trusted by committee
Code Fund Lends a Hand
• TC rep and/or staff liaison submits a Code Fund Request
• Requests are reviewed by a Panel and chosen based on need / feasibility
Research Project Carried Out
• Funding for project is provided by the Code Fund and/or industry sponsors
• Project is completed and data is available to TC
www.nfpa.org/codefund
Page 25 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
16
About
• Document scope• Table of contents• Articles• Research and statistical
reports• Latest codes and
standards news on NFPA Today blog feed
• Free access
Current and Previous Editions
• Issued TIAs, FIs, Errata• Archived revision
information such as meeting and ballot information, First Draft Reports (previously ROPs), Second Draft Reports (previously ROCs), and Standards Council and NITMAM information
Next Edition
• Revision cycle schedule
• Posting & closing dates• Submit public
input/comments via electronic submission system.
• Meeting and ballot information
• First Draft Report and Second Draft Report
• NITMAM information• Standard Council
Decisions• Private TC info (*red
asterisk)• Ballot circulations,
informational ballots and other committee info
Technical Committee
• Committee name and staff liaison
• Committee scope and responsibility
• Committee list with private information
• Committee documents (codes & standards) in PDF format
• Committees seeking members
• Online committee membership application
Document Information Pages
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Questions
Page 26 of 120
NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings
17
nfpa.org | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.
Thank You
Page 27 of 120
Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.56 ]
3.3.56 Delayed Action Closer.
Self-closing device that incorporates a delay prior to the initiation of closing. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates anadjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA)
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
101_CCN_1.pdf 101 CC Note #1
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appreared as CC Note No. 1 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots of Pappas and Tierney to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows:
Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA)
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 1-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 3.3.56]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 14:41:06 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
8 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 28 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 1-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.56 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 07:22:45 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots ofPappas and Tierney to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows:
Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing.(SAF-MEA)
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
11 Eligible Voters
0 Not Returned
11 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Affirmative All
Bush, Kenneth E.
Hopper, Howard
Hrustich, Stephen
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund
Koffel, William E.
Pauls, Jake
Quiter, James R.
Reiswig, Rodger
Reynolds, Ronald C.
Rosenbaum, Eric R.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 1 3/2/2016 12:00 PM
Page 29 of 120
First Revision No. 5009-NFPA 101-2015 [ New Section after 3.3.55 ]
3.3.56 Delayed Action Closer.
Self-closing device that incorporates a delay prior to the initiation of closing. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates anadjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA)
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Jul 27 15:13:45 EDT 2015
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
Delayed action closers are utilized in buildings. Proposing a definition to complement proposed text in new section after7.2.1.8.3. See FR-5008.
Response Message:
Public Input No. 439-NFPA 101-2015 [New Section after 3.3.55]
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
30 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
26 Affirmative All
2 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Di Pilla, Steven
Vander Roest, Nathan John
Affirmative All
Alles, Ryan
Badeau, Charles A.
Barlow, Charles V.
Bonisch, Warren D.
Bush, Kenneth E.
Buuck, Daniel
Collins, David S.
Crowley, Michael A.
Day, Richard L.
Dove, Paul L.
Frable, David W.
Guest, Rita C.
Hoskins, Bryan Lawrence
Jackson, Waymon
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 5/26/2016 2:04 PM
Page 30 of 120
Lathrop, James K.
Nuschler, Gary L.
Pauls, Jake
Peacock, Richard D.
Perry, Robert R.
Quinterno, Vincent
Saks, Kenneth
Schwarzenberg, Roy W.
Shulman, Michael S.
Simard, J. Francois
Versteeg, Joseph H.
de Vries, David A.
Affirmative with Comment
Pappas, Denise L.
The text shown for the definition of “Delayed Action Closer” Should be the same in both FR 6006 and FR 5009.
Tierney, Michael
Approve with comment: Recommend slight edit, as illustrated, to remove redundant text: 3.3.56 Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closingdevice that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. Delete: Self-closing device that incorporates a delay prior to theinitiation of closing. (SAF-MEA)
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 5/26/2016 2:04 PM
Page 31 of 120
Public Comment No. 60-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.1.3.2.1 ]
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
15 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 32 of 120
7.1.3.2.1
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
16 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 33 of 120
Where this Code requires an exit to be separated from other parts of the building, the separating construction shall meet therequirements of Section 8.2 and the following:
(1)
(2) The separation specified in 7.1.3.2.1(1), other than an existing separation, shall be supported by construction having not lessthan a 1-hour fire resistance rating.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7) Reserved.
(8) The minimum 2-hour fire resistance–rated separation required by 7.1.3.2.1(3) shall be constructed of an assembly ofnoncombustible or limited-combustible materials and shall be supported by construction having a minimum 2-hour fire resistancerating, unless otherwise permitted by 7.1.3.2.1(7).
(9)
(10) Fire-retardant-treated wood enclosed in noncombustible or limited-combustible materials shall be permitted in accordance withNFPA 220.
(11) Openings in the separation shall be protected by fire door assemblies equipped with door closers complying with 7.2.1.8.
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24) Penetrations into, and openings through, an exit enclosure assembly shall be limited to the following:
(25) Door assemblies permitted by 7.1.3.2.1(9)
(26)
(27) Pathways for devices for security and communication systems serving the exit enclosure, where pathways are installed inmetal conduit
(28)
(29) Ductwork and equipment necessary for independent stair pressurization
(30) Water or steam piping necessary for the heating or cooling of the exit enclosure
(31) Sprinkler piping
* The separation shall have a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating where the exit connects three or fewer stories.
* The separation shall have a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rating where the exit connects four or more stories, unless one ofthe following conditions exists:
In existing non-high-rise buildings, existing exit stair enclosures shall have a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating.
In existing buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance withSection 9.7 , existing exit stair enclosures shall have a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating.
The minimum 1-hour enclosures in accordance with 28.2.2.1.2 , 29.2.2.1.2 , 30.2.2.1.2 , and 31.2.2.1.2 shall bepermitted as an alternative to the requirement of 7.1.3.2.1(3) .
* Structural elements, or portions thereof, that support exit components and either penetrate into a fire resistance–ratedassembly or are installed within a fire resistance–rated wall assembly shall be protected, as a minimum, to the fire resistancerating required by 7.1.3.2.1(1) or 7.1.3.2.1(3).
* Openings in exit enclosures shall be limited to door assemblies from normally occupied spaces and corridors and doorassemblies for egress from the enclosure, unless one of the following conditions exists:
Vestibules that separate normally unoccupied spaces from an exit enclosure shall be permitted, provided the vestibule isseparated from adjacent spaces by corridor walls and related opening protectives as required for the occupancy involvedbut not less than a smoke partition in accordance with Section 8.4 .
In buildings of Type I or Type II construction, as defined in NFPA 220 (see 8.2.1.2 ) , fire protection–rated doorassemblies to normally unoccupied building service equipment support areas as addressed in Section 7.14 shall bepermitted, provided the space is separated from the exit enclosure by fire barriers as required by 7.1.3.2.1(3) .
Openings in exit passageways in mall buildings as provided in Chapters 36 and 37 shall be permitted.
In buildings of Type I or Type II construction, as defined in NFPA 220 (see 8.2.1.2 ) , existing fire protection–rated doorassemblies to interstitial spaces shall be permitted, provided that such spaces meet all of the following criteria:
The space is used solely for distribution of pipes, ducts, and conduits.
The space contains no storage.
The space is separated from the exit enclosure in accordance with Section 8.3 .
Existing openings to mechanical equipment spaces protected by approved existing fire protection–rated door assembliesshall be permitted, provided that the following criteria are met:
The space is used solely for non-fuel-fired mechanical equipment.
The space contains no storage of combustible materials.
The building is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance withSection 9.7 or the mechanical equipment space is provided with sprinkler protection in accordance with Section 9.7and provided with complete smoke detection in accordance with Section 9.6 .
* Electrical conduit serving the exit enclosure
* Required exit door openings
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
17 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 34 of 120
(32) Standpipes
(33) Existing penetrations
(34) Penetrations for fire alarm circuits, where the circuits are installed in metal conduit
(35) Penetrations or communicating openings shall be prohibited between adjacent exit enclosures.
(36) All penetrations in fire barriers separating the exit from other parts of the building shall be protected in accordance with 8.3.4.
(37) Membrane penetrations shall be permitted on the exit access side of the exit enclosure and shall be protected in accordancewith 8.3.4.7.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
Item 7 has been changed to allow fire retardant treated wood in stair shafts in accordance with NFPA 220. However, NFPA 220, 4.3.2.11.1 (shown below) does not allow FRTW in shafts. Would not the exit stair be considered a shaft and thus FRTW not be permitted? The term "stair shaft" is used in 7.9.1.1 (5). Are exit stair enclosures not shafts? An annex note might help to explain the committee's intent.
4.3.2.11.2 Interior nonbearing walls required to have a fireresistance rating of 2 hours or less shall be permitted to befire-retardant-treated wood enclosed within noncombustibleor limited-combustible materials, provided that such walls arenot used as shaft enclosures. [5000:7.2.3.2.11.2]
Related Item
First Revision No. 5001-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.1.3.2.1]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Peter Larrimer
Organization: US Department of Veterans Affa
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Mar 22 08:52:58 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
18 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 35 of 120
Public Comment No. 146-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.1.6.5 ]
7.1.6.5 * Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations , and Showers.
7.1.6.5.1
General.
7.1.6.5.1.1
Where Where required by Chapters
1115 through
4331 , new bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations,
or showers, for use by occupants,and showers shall be provided with grab bars
complying with.
7.1.6.5.
2 through 7.1.
6.5.5, except as otherwise permitted for showers in 7.1.
6.5.1.2, with all dimensions referring to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stipulated.
7.1.6.5.1.2 *
Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding1 * Grab bars are not required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13mm)
, as described in 7.1.6.2 , and it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as a foreseeable condition described inin height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet.
7.1.6.
4, the requirements of5.1.2 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 7.1.6.5.2 through 7.1.6.5.5
shall apply only if grab bars are installed.
7.1.6.5.1.3 All dimensions are measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stated .
7.1.6.5.2
Vertical Grab Bar.
A vertical grab bar shall be provided
either installedon the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower
as specified in 7.1.6.5.2.1 or as a free-standing external pole as specified in 7.1.6.5.2.2 .; or, shall be provided as an external vertical pole.
7.1.6.5.2.1 *
Vertical Vertical Grab Bar on
ControlEnd Wall.
(A
) Avertical grab bar
, with a minimum length ofshall be:
(1) 24 in. (610 mm)
, and its lower end
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
19 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 36 of 120
(1) minimum in length;
(2) located between 36 and 39 in. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished floor
, shall be
(1) measured to its lower end;
(2) installed on the
entry/egress
(1) open side of the
control end wall of the
(1) bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower
unit.
(B)
The grab bar shall be located at least 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, from any shower curtain rod fixing point on the wall
(1) used for entry and egress; and
(2) located 9 in. (228 mm) minimum and 12 in. (300 mm) maximum from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, orshower .
Vertical Grab Bar as Free Standing, Vertical7.1.6.5.2.2 *
External Vertical Pole.
A vertical, pole-type grab bar shall be fixed to the floor and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shall be :
(1) installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit ;
(2) located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally
,
(1) of the outside of the outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower ; and
(2) located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally
,
(1) of the vertical plane of the control end wall
if there is such a wall
(1) .
7.1.6.5.3
Back Wall Grab Bar.
For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on three sides by walls, a diagonal 7 or horizontal grab bar shall beprovided on the back wall
either as a diagonal grab bar as specified in 7.1.6.5.3.1 or as a horizontal grab bar as specified in.
7.1.6.5.3.
2.7
.1
.6.5.3.1* Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall.
(A)
A A diagonal grab bar shall be
installed on the back wall with a minimum length of:
(1) 24 in. (600 mm)
with
(1) minimum in length;
(2) located so that its higher end
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
20 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 37 of 120
placed closer
(1) is closest to the control end wall
and
(1) ;
(2) located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall,
with a height of 25 to
(1)
(2) located 25 in. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (635
to
(1) mm and 685 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub
.
(B)
The lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height of 8 to
(1) ;
(2) located so that its lower end is 8 in. minimum and 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub ; and
28 to
(1)
(2) located 28 in. (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (710
to
(1) mm and 760 mm) maximum from the control end wall.
7.1.6.5.3.2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall.
A horizontal grab bar shall be
installed on the back wall at a height of 8 to:
(1) located 8 in. (205 mm) minimum and 10 in. (
205 to
(1) 255 mm) maximum high above the bathtub rim
with
(1) ; and
(2) located so that one end
located a maximum of
(1) is 12 in. (305 mm) maximum from the control end wall and the other end is located
a maximum of
(1) 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub.
7.1.6.5.4 *
Grab Bar Details.
7.1.6.5.4.1
Grab Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1
1 ⁄ 41⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).
7.1.6.5.4.2
If Where attached to a wall,
thegrab
barbars shall provide a
minimumclearance for hand grasp of 1
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
21 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 38 of 120
1 ⁄ 21⁄2 in. (38 mm)
for hand graspminimum .
7.1.6.5.4.3
The size and clearance dimensions required by 7.1.6.5.4.1 and 7.1.6.5.4.2 shall be provided, as a minimum, within the heightrequirements range and the minimum length requirements range of the other provisions of 7.1.6.5 .
7.1.6.5.5 Grab Grab Bar Structural Loading.
Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with
the building codeother provisions of 7 this Code .
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
Grab_Bars-Legislative_Text-25-16_Chapter_7.docx
Word Doc in legislative text for more clarity as to what the proposed changes are.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NFPA's Disability Access Review and Advisory Committee (DARAC) supports the concept of the first revision but has voted unanimously to propose re-writing the section so that it is workable, clear, and concise.
Related Item
First Revision No. 5036-NFPA 101-2015 [New Section after 7.1.6.4]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Allan Fraser
Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc
Affilliation: Staff Liaison for NFPA's Disability Access Review and Advisory Committee (DARAC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed May 11 11:04:55 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
22 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 39 of 120
7.1.6.5 * Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.
7.1.6.5.1 General. 7.1.6.5.1.1 Where required by Chapters 15 through 31, new bathtubs, bathtub-shower
combinations, and showers, for use by occupants, shall be provided with grab bars complying.
7.1.6.5.1.1.1* Grab bars are not required in showers where the transition from the room floor to
the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13 mm) in height and all shower surfaces are slip
resistant when wet.
7.1.6.5.1.2 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 7.1.6.5.2 through 7.1.6.5.5, except as
otherwise permitted for showers in .
7.1.6.5.1.2, with all3 All dimensions referringare measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless
otherwise stipulatedstated.
7.1.6.5.1.2* Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding 0.5 inch (13 mm), as described in .1.6.2, and, it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as described in .1.6.4, the requirements of .1.6.5.2 through .1.6.5.5 shall apply only if grab bars are installed.
7.1.6.5.2 Vertical Grab Bar. A vertical grab bar shall be provided and shall be installed either on the
control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination or shower as specified in .1.6.5.2.1 or as a free
standing, external pole as specified in .1.6.5.2.2. .1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on Control End Wall.
(A) A vertical grab bar, the end wall opposite the 24 in. (610 mm) long minimum, shall be installed on the
entry/egress side of the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit.
The lower end of the grab bar; or, shall be provided as an external vertical pole.
7.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on End Wall.
A vertical grab bar shall be:
1. 24 in. (610 mm) minimum in length;
1.2. located between 36 in. min. and 39 in. max. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished
floor. measured to its lower end;
3. (B) The grab bar shall be installed on the open side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower
combination, or shower used for entry and egress; and
2.4.located at least 69 in. (150228 mm),) minimum and 12 in. (300 mm) maximum
from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,
or shower, measured horizontally, from any the exterior plane of the bathtub,
bathtub-shower curtain rod fixing point on the wallcombination, or shower.
7.1.6.5.2.2* Vertical Grab Bar as Floor MountedExternal Vertical Pole. A vertical, pole-type grab
bar shall be fixed to the floor and, either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall. The vertical bar and
shall be :
1. installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit;
Formatted: Adjust space between Latin and Asian text,
Adjust space between Asian text and numbers
Page 40 of 120
2. located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally from of the outside of the
outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination or shower. Where a control end
wall is provided, the vertical grab bar shall be , or shower; and
1.3.located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally fromof the vertical plane of
the control end wall.
7.1.6.5.3 Back Wall Grab Bar. For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on
three sides by walls, a grab bar shall be provided on the back wall either as a diagonal grab bar as specified in
7.1.6.5.3.1 or as aor horizontal grab bar as specified in shall be provided on the back wall.
7.1.6.5.3.2.
(A) A diagonal grab bar shall be installed on the back wall with a minimum length of :
1. 24 in. (600 mm) withminimum in length;
2. located so that its higher end placed closeris closest to the control end wall and ;
3. located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall, with a height of
1.4.located 25 toin. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (635 tomm and 685 mm)
maximum above the rim of the bathtub.;
5. (B) The located so that its lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height ofis
8 toin. minimum and 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) maximum above the rim of the
bathtub; and
2.6.located 28 toin. (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (710 tomm and 760 mm)
maximum from the control end wall.
7.1.6.5.3.2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall. A horizontal grab bar shall be installed on the
back wall at a height of:
1. located 8 in. min.(205 mm) minimum and 10 in. max (205 and (255 mm) maximum
high above the bathtub rim. One; and
1.2.located so that one end of the grab bar shall be located a maximum ofis 12 in. (305 mm)
maximum from the control end wall and the other end shall beis located a maximum
of 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite (, or head), end of the bathtub.
7.1.6.5.4* Grab Bar Details.
7.1.6.5.4.1 Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1/⁄4 in. (32
mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).
7.1.6.5.4.22 If, Where attached to a wall, the grab barbars shall provide a minimum clearance, for
hand grasp, of 1 1/⁄2 inchesin. (38 mm).) minimum.
7.1.6.5.4.34.3 The size and clearance dimensions required by .4.1 and .1.6.5.4.2 Grab Bar Structural
Loading. Grab bars shall be provided, as a minimum, within the height requirements ranger and the minimum
length requirements range of thedesigned and constructed to the structural loading conditions in
accordance with other provisions of 7.1.6.5this Code.
Page 41 of 120
Public Comment No. 170-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.1.6.5 ]
7.1.6.5* Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.
7.1.6.5.1 General.
7.1.6.5.1.1
Where required by Chapters 11 through 43, new bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers , for use by occupants, shall beprovided with grab bars complying with 7.1.6.5.2 through 7.1.6.5.5, except as otherwise permitted for showers in 7.1.6.5.1.2, with alldimensions referring . All dimensions refer to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stipulated.
7.1.6.5.1.2*
Where a dedicated shower, not included with a bathtub, does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding 0.5 in. (13 mm),as described in 7.1.6.2, and it provides slip resistance for all walking surfaces when wet, as a foreseeable condition described in7.1.6.4, the requirements of 7.1.6.5.2 through 7.1.6.5.5 shall apply only if grab bars are installed.
7.1.6.5.2 Vertical Grab Bar.
A vertical grab bar shall be provided either installed on one of the control end wall walls of the bathtub, bathtub-showercombination , or shower as specified in 7.1.6.5.2.1 or as a free-standing external , and at the entry/egress side of a shower asspecified in 7.1.6.2.2. For bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations and showers, the requirement for a grab bar is also met withprovision of a pole as specified in 7.1.6.5.2.2 3 .
7.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on Control End Wall . or Opposite end Wall of Bathtub or Bathtub-shower Combination
(A)
A vertical grab bar, with a minimum length of 24 36 in. (610 915 mm), and its lower end between 36 24 and 39 27 in. (915 610and 990 685 mm) above the finished floor, shall be installed on the entry/egress side of one of the control end wall walls of thebathtub , or bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit. . Where access to the control wall end of bathtub or bathtub-showercombination is obstructed by another plumbing fixture the vertical grab shall be provided either on the opposite-end wall or as avertical pole complying with 7.1.6.5.2.3
(B)
The grab bar shall be located at least 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, from any the shower curtain rod fixing point onattachment to the wall.
7.1.6.5.2.2 Vertical Grab Bar at Entry/Egress of a Shower. A vertical grab bar, with a minimum length of 24 in. (610 mm), and itslower end between 36 and 39 in. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished floor, shall be installed on the entry/egress side of the shower.
7.1.6.5.2.3 * Vertical Grab Bar Provided as Free Standing, a Vertical Pole.
A vertical, pole-type grab bar fixed to the floor or bathtub wall and either to the room ceiling or an adjacent wall shall be installedoutside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally , outside of theouter edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit and within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally, of thevertical plane of the control end wall if there is such a wall. The pole shall located so as to be usable during entry/egress transitionsbetween the bathing/showering facility and the adjacent floor.
7.1.6.5.3 Back Wall Grab Bar.
For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on three sides by walls, a grab bar shall be provided on the back wall eitheras a diagonal grab bar as specified in 7.1.6.5.3.1 or as a horizontal grab bar as specified in 7.1.6.5.3.2.
7.1.6.5.3.1* Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall.
(A)
A diagonal grab bar shall be installed on the back wall with a minimum length of 24 in. (600 mm) with its higher end placed closer tothe control end wall and located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall, with a height of 25 to 27 in. (635 to 685 mm)above rim of the bathtub.
(B)
The lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height of 8 to 10 in. (205 to 255 mm) above the rim of the bathtub and 28to 30 in. (710 to 760 mm) from the control end wall.
7.1.6.5.3.2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall.
A horizontal grab bar shall be installed on the back wall at a height of 8 to 10 in. (205 to 255 mm) above the bathtub rim with one endlocated a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall and the other end located a maximum of 24 in. (610 mm) from theopposite , or head, end of the bathtub.
7.1.6.5.4* Grab Bar Details.
7.1.6.5.4.1
Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).
7.1.6.5.4.2
If attached to a wall, the grab bar shall provide a minimum clearance of 1 1⁄2 in. (38 mm) for hand grasp.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
23 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 42 of 120
7.1.6.5.4.3
The size and clearance dimensions required by 7.1.6.5.4.1 and 7.1.6.5.4.2 shall be provided, as a minimum, within the heightrequirements range and the minimum length requirements range of the other provisions of 7.1.6.5 .
7.1.6.5.5 Grab Bar Structural Loading.
Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with the building code.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The proposed changes to the originally proposed text resulted from months of consultation with experts in the US and Canada, especially during a face-to-face meeting held in Toronto on March 31 and April 1, 2016. In addition, editorial changes are based on those suggested by one of the experts, Marsha Mazz, from the US Access Board and member of NFPA's Disability Advisory Review Committee. At the face-to-face meeting there was extensive discussion and consensus on provision of a vertical grab bar on the wall opposite the control-end wall, especially where (as is fairly common in smaller bathrooms) water supply and drainage, for toileting, bathing/showering and other washing, etc. are located on a common wall. This leads to a significant portion of the length of a typical bathtub, at the control wall end, being partly obstructed, typically by a water closet. The substantive revisions suggested in this comment address this issue effectively by providing more flexibility in grab bar provision than first proposed.
Also reflecting expert input from the meeting, is the revision to the lower height threshold for vertical grab bars for bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations used by shorter adults and children, especially in either the bathing mode or the shower mode. The additional grab bar length specified is not a major cost issue as wall-mounted (or other) grab bar length is not a large component of purchase cost and does not significantly affect installation cost. The combination of purchase and installation costs, per bathroom, is quite comparable to the average, per-household cost of bathing/showering/toileting-related fall injuries occurring over a two or three-year period in the USA. Usability is a benefit of at least similar value and this is especially significant for older users.
The addition of toileting-related usability and safety in the considerations behind the proposals and comments is especially related to the dual benefits of the pole-type grab bars that can serve not only the bathing/showering transfer functions but the more pervasive use of water closets, particularly in smaller bathrooms that are found in large proportions of bathrooms in all types of facilities.
There has also been much study of actual installations, especially as one of the original proponents travels extensively and uses many bathing/showering facilities in hotels around the world. This provided additional insights justifying and, in some respects, suggesting fine-tuning of the concepts at the core of the first revision proposal. Work has also been done especially on the addition of grab bars to existing bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations — i.e., not just new facilities. The vertical poles (plus some horizontally-oriented poles at the back wall of bathtubs) show great promise for relatively inexpensive and highly functional grab bars in retrofit situations for existing facilities, including those in rental properties where holes cannot be made in walls (as is the case for conventional, wall-mounted grab bars.
There has also been much attention given, in consultation with top experts on injury epidemiology and costs to the relatively high risks and consequences of falls involving not only bathing/showering but also toileting. Much of this will be reflected in national and international conferences being held in Canada, the US and the UK prior to or shortly after the public comments are addressed by NFPA committees. These include two national and international conferences focused on falls and two national conference focused on public health generally. More information on these will be shared directly with NFPA committee members responsible for this core menu item and for scoping in all or most occupancy chapters of NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000.
Significantly, due to the crush of preparation for such conferences (in which the submitter of these comments is deeply involved as an organizer and presenter), it is not possible to submit parallel comments for NFPA 5000. Therefore, it is explicitly requested that in all cases, the committees process these comments in relation to both codes (NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000.
Finally, the conferences as well as the recent, face-to-face meeting of several US and Canadian experts are all documented with video. The first two videos in this series are available for streaming viewing by anyone, at no cost, at http://www.imagosentertainment.com/Under_Construction.html. These two early videos not only identify the experts but provide an excellent introduction to the extensive evidence obtained in research performed over the last two decades.
Related Public Comments for This Document
Related Comment Relationship
Public Comment No. 172-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 20.2.1]
Public Comment No. 173-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 24.5.2]
Public Comment No. 174-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 26.5.3]
Public Comment No. 175-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 36.2.1.5]
Public Comment No. 176-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 38.2.1.4]
Public Comment No. 177-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 40.2.1.2]
Public Comment No. 178-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 42.2.1.2]
Related Item
First Revision No. 5036-NFPA 101-2015 [New Section after 7.1.6.4]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Jake Pauls
Organization: Jake Pauls Consulting Services
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
24 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 43 of 120
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Sat May 14 19:57:36 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
25 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 44 of 120
Public Comment No. 42-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 7.2.1.5.3 ]
New Section
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
101_CCN_45.pdf 101 CC Note #45
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 45 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review the additional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FCR-6.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 45-NFPA 101-2016 [New Section after 7.2.1.5.3]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Thu Mar 03 15:06:01 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
26 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 45 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 45-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 7.2.1.5.3 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 11:51:19 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review theadditional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FCR-6.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
11 Eligible Voters
0 Not Returned
11 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Affirmative All
Bush, Kenneth E.
Hopper, Howard
Hrustich, Stephen
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund
Koffel, William E.
Pauls, Jake
Quiter, James R.
Reiswig, Rodger
Reynolds, Ronald C.
Rosenbaum, Eric R.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 1 3/2/2016 12:05 PM
Page 46 of 120
First Correlating Revision No. 6-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 7.2.1.5.10.6 ]
7.2.1.5.10.7
Two releasing operations shall be permitted for educational occupancy classroom doors secured against unwanted entry inaccordance with the provisions of Chapter 15 .
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 07:55:19 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
Committee Statement: The new provision of 7.2.1.5.10.7 is needed so that the new provisions of 15.2.2.2.4 do not conflict with Chapter 7.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
11 Eligible Voters
0 Not Returned
11 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Affirmative All
Bush, Kenneth E.
Hopper, Howard
Hrustich, Stephen
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund
Koffel, William E.
Pauls, Jake
Quiter, James R.
Reiswig, Rodger
Reynolds, Ronald C.
Rosenbaum, Eric R.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 1 5/25/2016 3:51 PM
Page 47 of 120
Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.6.1 ]
7.2.1.6.1 Delayed-Egress Electrically Electrical Locking Systems.
7.2.1.6.1.1
Approved, delayed-egress electrically electrical locking systems shall be permitted to be installed on door assemblies serving low-and ordinary-hazard contents in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system inaccordance with Section 9.6 or an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, and wherepermitted in Chapters 11 through 43, provided that all of the following criteria are met:
(1) The delay of the delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system shall deactivate allowing unobstructed egress uponactuation of one of the following:
(2) Approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7
(3) Not more than one heat detector of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section9.6
(4) Not more than two smoke detectors of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance withSection 9.6
(5) The delay of the delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system shall deactivate allowing unobstructed egress upon lossof power controlling the lock or locking mechanism.
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14) The egress side of doors equipped with delayed-egress electrically electrical locking system shall be provided with emergencylighting in accordance with Section 7.9.
(15) Hardware for new installations shall be listed in accordance with ANSI/UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units.
7.2.1.6.1.2
The provisions of 7.2.1.6.2 for sensor-release of electrical locking systems shall not apply to door assemblies with delayed-egresselectrically electrical locking systems.
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
101_CCN_7.pdf 101 CC Note #7
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 7 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Tierney to revise the term “delayed egress electrically locking systems” to “delayed egress electrical locking systems” and make consistent use of the term.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 7-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 7.2.1.6.1]
* An irreversible process shall release the electrical lock in the direction of egress within 15 seconds, or 30 seconds whereapproved by the authority having jurisdiction, upon application of a force to the release device required in 7.2.1.5.10 under all ofthe following conditions:
The force shall not be required to exceed 15 lbf (67 N).
The force shall not be required to be continuously applied for more than 3 seconds.
The initiation of the release process shall activate an audible signal in the vicinity of the door opening.
Once the electrical lock has been released by the application of force to the releasing device, rearming the delayelectronics shall be by manual means only.
* A readily visible, durable sign that conforms to the visual characters requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1, Accessible and UsableBuildings and Facilities, shall be located on the door leaf adjacent to the release device in the direction of egress, and shall readas follows:
PUSH UNTIL ALARM SOUNDS, DOOR CAN BE OPENED IN 15 SECONDS, for doors that swing in the direction ofegress travel
PULL UNTIL ALARM SOUNDS, DOOR CAN BE OPENED IN 15 SECONDS, for doors that swing against the directionof egress travel
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
27 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 48 of 120
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 15:15:33 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
28 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 49 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 7-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.6.1 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 07:57:52 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Tierneyto revise the term “delayed egress electrically locking systems” to “delayed egress electrical locking systems” and makeconsistent use of the term.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
11 Eligible Voters
0 Not Returned
11 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Affirmative All
Bush, Kenneth E.
Hopper, Howard
Hrustich, Stephen
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund
Koffel, William E.
Pauls, Jake
Quiter, James R.
Reiswig, Rodger
Reynolds, Ronald C.
Rosenbaum, Eric R.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 1 3/2/2016 12:11 PM
Page 50 of 120
First Revision No. 5029-NFPA 101-2015 [ Section No. 7.2.1.6.1 ]
Global FR-3004
7.2.1.6.1 Delayed-Egress Electrically Locking Systems.
Global FR-5041
7.2.1.6.1.1
Approved, listed, delayed-egress electrically locking systems shall be permitted to be installed on door assemblies serving low- andordinary-hazard contents in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordancewith Section 9.6 or an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 , and where permitted inChapters 11 through 43 , provided that all of the following criteria are met:
(1) The door leaves shall unlock in the direction of delay of the delayed-egress electrically locking system shall deactivate allowingunobstructed egress upon actuation of one of the following:
(a) Approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7
(b) Not more than one heat detector of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section 9.6
(c) Not more than two smoke detectors of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section9.6
(2) The door leaves shall unlock in the direction of delay of the delayed-egress electrically locking system shall deactivate allowingunobstructed egress upon loss of power controlling the lock or locking mechanism.
(3)
(4)
(5) The egress side of doors equipped with delayed-egress locks electrically locking system shall be provided with emergencylighting in accordance with Section 7.9 .
(6) Hardware for new installations shall be listed in accordance with ANSI/UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units .
7.2.1.6.1.2
The provisions of 7.2.1.6.2 for access-controlled egress door assemblies sensor-release of electrical locking systems shall not apply todoor assemblies with delayed-egress electrically locking systems.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed Jul 29 12:23:15 EDT 2015
* An irreversible process shall release the electrical lock in the direction of egress within 15 seconds, or 30 seconds whereapproved by the authority having jurisdiction, upon application of a force to the release device required in 7.2.1.5.10 under all ofthe following conditions:
(a) The force shall not be required to exceed 15 lbf (67 N).
(b) The force shall not be required to be continuously applied for more than 3 seconds.
(c) The initiation of the release process shall activate an audible signal in the vicinity of the door opening.
(d) Once the electrical lock has been released by the application of force to the releasing device, relocking rearming the delayelectronics shall be by manual means only.
* A readily visible, durable sign in letters not less than 1 in. (25 mm) high and not less than 1 ⁄8 in. (3.2 mm) in stroke width on acontrasting background that conforms to the visual characters requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1, Accessible and Usable Buildingsand Facilities , shall be located on the door leaf adjacent to the release device in the direction of egress, and shall read as follows:
(a) PUSH UNTIL ALARM SOUNDS, DOOR CAN BE OPENED IN 15 SECONDS, for doors that swing in the direction of egresstravel
(b) PULL UNTIL ALARM SOUNDS, DOOR CAN BE OPENED IN 15 SECONDS, for doors that swing against the direction ofegress travel
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 3 5/26/2016 2:07 PM
Page 51 of 120
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The revisions clarify the requirements of this section, and add a needed requirement for electrical locking hardware to belisted to UL 294.
Response Message:
Public Input No. 429-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.2.1.6.1]
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
30 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
27 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Di Pilla, Steven
Vander Roest, Nathan John
Affirmative All
Alles, Ryan
Badeau, Charles A.
Barlow, Charles V.
Bonisch, Warren D.
Bush, Kenneth E.
Buuck, Daniel
Collins, David S.
Crowley, Michael A.
Day, Richard L.
Dove, Paul L.
Frable, David W.
Guest, Rita C.
Hoskins, Bryan Lawrence
Jackson, Waymon
Lathrop, James K.
Nuschler, Gary L.
Pappas, Denise L.
Pauls, Jake
Peacock, Richard D.
Perry, Robert R.
Quinterno, Vincent
Saks, Kenneth
Schwarzenberg, Roy W.
Shulman, Michael S.
Simard, J. Francois
Versteeg, Joseph H.
de Vries, David A.
Affirmative with Comment
Tierney, Michael
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 3 5/26/2016 2:07 PM
Page 52 of 120
Approve with comment: Recommend slight edit, replace "electrically" with "electrical" as illustrated: 7.2.1.6.1 Delayed-Egress Electrically LockingSystems. 7.2.1.6.1.1 Approved, listed, delayed-egress electrical locking systems shall be permitted to be installed on door assemblies servinglow- and ordinary-hazard contents in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordancewith Section 9.6 or an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 , and where permitted in Chapters 11through 43 , provided that all of the following criteria are met: (1) The door leaves shall unlock in the direction of delay of the delayed-egresselectrical locking system shall deactivate allowing unobstructed egress upon actuation of one of the following: (a) Approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 (b) Not more than one heat detector of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection systemin accordance with Section 9.6 (c) Not more than two smoke detectors of an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system in accordancewith Section 9.6 (2) The door leaves shall unlock in the direction of delay of the delayed-egress electrical locking system shall deactivate allowingunobstructed egress upon loss of power controlling the lock or locking mechanism. 7.2.1.6.1.2 The provisions of 7.2.1.6.2 for access-controlledegress door assemblies sensor-release of electrical locking systems shall not apply to door assemblies with delayed-egress electrical lockingsystems.
Editorial Comment
Click here
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
3 of 3 5/26/2016 2:07 PM
Page 53 of 120
Public Comment No. 61-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.1.15.6 ]
7.2.1.15.6
As a minimum, the following items shall be verified:
(1) Floor space on both sides of the openings is clear of obstructions, and door leaves open fully and close freely.
(2) Forces required to set door leaves in motion and move to the fully open position do not exceed the requirements in 7.2.1.4.5.
(3) Latching and locking devices comply with 7.2.1.5.
(4) Releasing hardware devices are installed in accordance with 7.2.1.5.10.1.
(5) Door leaves of paired openings are installed in accordance with 7.2.1.5.11.
(6) Door closers are adjusted properly to control the closing speed of door leaves in accordance with accessibility requirements.
(7) Projection of door leaves into the path of egress does not exceed the encroachment permitted by 7.2.1.4.3.
(8) Powered door openings operate in accordance with 7.2.1.9.
(9) Signage required by 7.2.1.4.1(3), 7.2.1.5.5, 7.2.1.6, and 7.2.1.9 is intact and legible.
(10) Door openings with special locking arrangements function in accordance with 7.2.1.6.
(11) Security devices that impede egress are not installed on openings, as required by 7.2.1.5.12.
(12) Where required by 7.2.2.5.5.7, door hardware marking is present and intact.
(13) Emergency lighting on sensor-release of electrical locking systems and doors equipped with delayed-egress electrically lockingsystems is present and functioning in accordance with Section 7.9 .
(14)
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
To test the emergency lighting is not a simple inspection procedure. Where generators are provided to supply emergency power, the inspection required by 7.2.1.15.6(13) would require the generator to be tested to ensure that the emergency lighting is "functioning" in accordance with 7.9. This is unreasonable to expect on an annual basis for these doors and the requirement should be removed.
Related Item
First Revision No. 5041-NFPA 101-2015 [Global Input]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Peter Larrimer
Organization: US Department of Veterans Affa
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Mar 22 09:52:03 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
29 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 54 of 120
Public Comment No. 9-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.3.9.4 ]
7.2.3.9.4
The requirement of 7.2.3.9.2 shall not apply to any of the following:
(1) Control wiring and power wiring utilizing a 2-hour-rated cable or cable system
(2) Where encased with not less than 2 in. (5 51 mm) of concrete
(3) Control wiring and power wiring protected by a listed electrical circuit protective system with not less than a 2-hour fire resistiverating
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
101_CCN_9.pdf 101 CC Note #9
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC No. No. 9 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to correct the metric value in 7.2.3.9.4(2) from “(5 mm)” to “(51 mm)”.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 9-NFPA 101-2016 [Section No. 7.2.3.9]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 16:04:24 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
30 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 55 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 9-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.3.9 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 08:02:43 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to correct the metric value in 7.2.3.9.4(2) from “(5mm)” to “(51 mm)”.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
11 Eligible Voters
0 Not Returned
11 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Affirmative All
Bush, Kenneth E.
Hopper, Howard
Hrustich, Stephen
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund
Koffel, William E.
Pauls, Jake
Quiter, James R.
Reiswig, Rodger
Reynolds, Ronald C.
Rosenbaum, Eric R.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 1 3/2/2016 12:18 PM
Page 56 of 120
First Revision No. 5032-NFPA 101-2015 [ Section No. 7.2.3.9 ]
7.2.3.9 Enclosure Pressurization.
7.2.3.9.1*
Smokeproof enclosures using pressurization shall use an approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the
barrier of not less than 0.05 in. water column (12.5 N/m 2 ) in sprinklered buildings, or 0.10 in. water column (25 N/m 2 ) innonsprinklered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining these pressure differences under likely conditions of stack effect or wind.The pressure difference across door openings shall not exceed that which allows the door leaves to begin to be opened by a force of 30lbf (133 N) in accordance with 7.2.1.4.5 .
7.2.3.9.1.1
Smokeproof enclosures using pressurization shall be in accordance with NFPA 92 .
7.2.3.9.2*
Equipment , control wiring, power wiring, and ductwork for pressurization shall be located in accordance with one of the followingspecifications:
(1) Exterior to the building and directly connected to the enclosure by ductwork enclosed in noncombustible construction
(2) Within the enclosure with intake and exhaust air vented directly to the outside or through ductwork enclosed by a 2-hourfire-resistive rating
(3) Within the building under the following conditions:
(a) Where the equipment , control wiring, power wiring, and ductwork are separated from the remainder of the building, includingother mechanical equipment, by a 2-hour fire-resistive rating
(b) Where the building, including the enclosure, is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler systeminstalled in accordance with Section 9.7 , and the equipment , control wiring, power wiring, and ductwork are separated fromthe remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, by not less than a 1-hour fire-resistive rating
7.2.3.9.3
In all cases specified by 7.2.3.9.2(1) through 7.2.3.9.2(3) , openings into the required fire resistance–rated construction shall be limitedto those needed for maintenance and operation and shall be protected by self-closing fire protection–rated devices in accordance with8.3.3.4.1 .
7.2.3.9.4
The requirement of 7.2.3.9.2 shall not apply to any of the following:
(1) Control wiring and power wiring utilizing a 2-hour-rated cable or cable system
(2) Where encased with not less than 2 in. (5 mm) of concrete
(3) Control wiring and power wiring protected by a listed electrical circuit protective system with not less than a 2-hour fire resistiverating
7.2.3.9.5
Equipment and ductwork for pressurization shall be located in accordance with one of the following specifications:
Exterior to the building and directly connected to the enclosure by ductwork enclosed in noncombustible construction
Within the enclosure with intake and exhaust air vented directly to the outside or through ductwork enclosed by a 2-hourfire-resistive rating
Within the building under the following conditions:
Where the equipment and ductwork are separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanicalequipment, by a 2-hour fire-resistive rating
Where the building, including the enclosure, is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler systeminstalled in accordance with Section 9.7 , and the equipment and ductwork are separated from the remainder of thebuilding, including other mechanical equipment, by not less than a 1-hour fire-resistive rating
7.2.3.9.6
In all cases specified by 7.2.3.9.2 (1) through (3), openings into the required fire resistance–rated construction shall be limited tothose needed for maintenance and operation and shall be protected by self-closing fire protection–rated devices in accordance with8.3.4 .
Supplemental Information
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 3 5/26/2016 2:12 PM
Page 57 of 120
File Name Description
101_FR5032_annex_text.docx
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: SAF-MEA
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed Jul 29 15:48:06 EDT 2015
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The fire safety criteria applicable to air traffic control towers (ATCTs) are originally based on an agreement between the operatorsand controllers utilizing the ATCTs. The changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service.
ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake andalert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the building’s limited uses, height, and the potential delay in evacuationbecause of the handoff of flights.
The proposed annex text to 7.2.3.9.2 clarifies the intent of control wiring such that all wiring integrated with the fan unit is notincluded.
Section 7.2.3.9.1 is proposed to ensure the requirements for smokeproof enclosures using pressurization systems meet NFPA 92.The design requirements of NFPA 92 are similar to that of NFPA 101 but provides additional detail for the design and testing ofpressurization systems.
Section 7.2.3.9.2 – The proposed change includes the requirements for control and power wiring. The existing wording did notclearly indicate whether the control and power wiring required for system operation would be included under the requiredprotection. The change explicitly states that all required parts of the system needed to operate shall be protected.
ResponseMessage:
Committee Notes:
Date Submitted By
Aug 3, 2015 Ron Cote Editor: See enclosed Word document for annex text. Please add asterisk to 7.2.3.9.2.
Public Input No. 391-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.2.3.9]
Public Input No. 178-NFPA 101-2015 [New Section after A.7.2.3.9.1]
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
30 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
27 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
1 Abstention
Not Returned
Di Pilla, Steven
Vander Roest, Nathan John
Affirmative All
Alles, Ryan
Badeau, Charles A.
Barlow, Charles V.
Bonisch, Warren D.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 3 5/26/2016 2:12 PM
Page 58 of 120
Bush, Kenneth E.
Buuck, Daniel
Collins, David S.
Day, Richard L.
Dove, Paul L.
Frable, David W.
Guest, Rita C.
Hoskins, Bryan Lawrence
Jackson, Waymon
Lathrop, James K.
Nuschler, Gary L.
Pappas, Denise L.
Pauls, Jake
Peacock, Richard D.
Perry, Robert R.
Quinterno, Vincent
Saks, Kenneth
Schwarzenberg, Roy W.
Shulman, Michael S.
Simard, J. Francois
Tierney, Michael
Versteeg, Joseph H.
de Vries, David A.
Abstention
Crowley, Michael A.
Abstain to avoid conflict
Editorial Comment
Click here
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
3 of 3 5/26/2016 2:12 PM
Page 59 of 120
Public Comment No. 182-NFPA 101-2016 [ New Section after 7.2.12.2.4 ]
TITLE OF NEW CONTENT
Type your content here ...
Add new section 7.2.12.2.4.3 as follows:
7.2.12.2.4.3 Emergency Stair Travel Devices
7.2.12.2.4.3.1 Number and Location.
7.2.12.2.4.3.1.1 All buildings that are two storys or more above grade and that are accessed by the public for goods and services, orthat have employees working on site, shall have an emergency stair travel device on each floor at each stairway.
7.2.12.2.4.3.1.2 There shall be one additional emergency stair travel device provided for each employee who will need to use one inan evacuation. These devices shall be located in the employee’s office or at the nearest stair to the employee’s office at their discretion.
7.2.12.2.4.3.2 All devices shall comply with ANSI/RESNA ED-1: 2013 .
7.2.12.2.4.3.3 Storage cabinets for such devices shall not be permitted to be locked at any time.
7.2.12.2.4.3.4 One manual wheelchair shall be located at each stairway at the floor of discharge and available, without requiring theuser to have a key or special knowledge, such that a user of an emergency stair travel device can be transferred to the manualwheelchair to travel from the stairway at the floor of discharge to the outside.
7.2.12.2.4.3.5 All members of an emergency planning team , if one exists, and all personnel who will be occupants or operators ofthe device shall be trained at least once each year on using the device and transferring those who may need to use the device in anemergency.
Statement:
Most of this language was submitted as Public Input No. 414-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.2.2.1.2]. In response to the committee’scomment, this Public Comment addresses the committee’s concern about office buildings and others that might not have the publicentering to obtain goods and services but simply has employees now, or may in the future, who have mobility disabilities
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The proposed change would increase the availability of emergency stair travel devices, and by referencing the ANSI/RESNA ED-1:2013 standard, would ensure quality of the devices.
Related Item
Public Input No. 414-NFPA 101-2015 [New Section after 7.2.2.1.2]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Glenn Hedman
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Sun May 15 21:12:39 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
31 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 60 of 120
Public Comment No. 157-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.3.3.1 ]
7.3.3.1 --NEMA recommends that the technical committee re-visit Public Input No. 117 to NFPA 101-2015 Section 7.3.3.1 andinclude the proposed change with the second revision of the document.
Egress capacity for approved components of means of egress shall be based on the capacity factors shown in Table 7.3.3.1, unlessotherwise provided in 7.3.3.2.
Table 7.3.3.1 Capacity Factors
Stairways (width/person)
Level Components and Ramps (width/person)
Area in. mm
in. mm
Board and care 0.4 10
0.2 5
Health care, sprinklered 0.3 7.6
0.2 5
Health care, nonsprinklered 0.6 15
0.5 13
High hazard contents 0.7 18
0.4 10
All others 0.3 7.6
0.2 5
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The combined use of sprinklers and an emergency voice/alarm communication system to permit the reduction in width is reasonable and not unprecedented. The benefits of a sprinkler system are well known. NEMA agrees with the submitter’s statement that people react better and more quickly to voice instructions and further agrees that a voice/alarm communication system makes other emergency messaging readily feasible, thereby further enhancing the overall safety of a building.
Related Item
Public Input No. 117-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.3.3.1]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Vince Baclawski
Organization: Nema
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Thu May 12 14:37:50 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
32 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 61 of 120
Public Comment No. 210-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.8.1.1 ]
7.8.1.1*
Illumination of means of egress shall be provided in accordance with Section 7.8 for every building and structure where required inChapters 11 through 43. For the purposes of this requirement, exit access shall include only designated stairs, aisles, corridors,ramps, escalators, and passageways leading to an exit. For the purposes of this requirement, exit discharge shall include onlydesignated stairs, aisles, corridors, ramps, escalators, walkways, egress courts and passageways leading to a public way.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
An egress court may be large enough for evacuation but not provide access to a walkway. "Egress court" is a fitting and functional description; especially on older campuses.
Related Item
Public Input No. 419-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.8.1.1]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Michael Anthony
Organization: University of Michigan
Affilliation: University of Michigan
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon May 16 15:09:47 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
33 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 62 of 120
Public Comment No. 216-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.9.2.1 ]
7.9.2.1
Emergency illumination shall be provided for a minimum of 1 1⁄2 hours in the event of failure of normal lighting. In buildings 10,000square feet and smaller with an on-site generator as the emergency power source, illumination shall be provided for a minimum of 1hour.
7.9.2.1.1
Emergency lighting facilities shall be arranged to provide initial illumination that is not less than an average of 1 ft-candle (10.8 lux)and, at any point, not less than 0.1 ft-candle (1.1 lux), measured along the path of egress at floor level.
7.9.2.1.2
Illumination levels shall be permitted to decline to not less than an average of 0.6 ft-candle (6.5 lux) and, at any point, not less than0.06 ft-candle (0.65 lux) at the end of 1 1⁄2 hours.
7.9.2.1.3
The maximum-to-minimum illumination shall not exceed a ratio of 40 to 1.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
We have modified the original proposal to pertain to buildings 10,000 square feet or less. It is wasteful to specify generator (or battery) run-time for a building so small it would take only seconds to evacuate; or for rescue personnel, already equipped with illumination, to do their work. We are only seeking language that would give local authorities options.
Related Item
Public Input No. 402-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.9.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Michael Anthony
Organization: University of Michigan
Affilliation: University of Michigan
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon May 16 15:37:44 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
34 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 63 of 120
Public Comment No. 215-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.9.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]
Emergency illumination shall be provided for a minimum of 1 1⁄2 hours in the event of failure of normal lighting. The illumination timemay be reduced to one hour where permitted by the
Authority Having Jurisdiction for small buildings
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
We disagree with the committee resolution that "The proposed revision adds unnecessary complexity". The proposed revision reduces cost that does not appreciably reduce safety - especially in smaller buildings. "Complexity" is in the eye of the beholder and we believe that permitting the scaling back to 1 hour reduces complexity.
Related Item
Public Input No. 384-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.9.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Michael Anthony
Organization: University of Michigan
Affilliation: @StandardsUMich
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon May 16 15:31:35 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
35 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 64 of 120
Public Comment No. 213-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.9.3.1 ]
7.9.3.1
Required emergency lighting systems shall be tested in accordance with one of the four options offered by 7.9.3.1.1, 7.9.3.1.2,7.9.3.1.3, or 7.9.3.1.4.
7.9.3.1.1
Testing of required emergency lighting systems shall be permitted in occupied buildings to be conducted as follows:
(1) Functional testing shall be conducted monthly, with a minimum of 3 weeks and a maximum of 5 weeks between tests, for notless than 30 seconds, except as otherwise permitted by 7.9.3.1.1(2).
(2)
(3) Functional testing shall be conducted annually for a minimum of 1 1⁄2 hours if the emergency lighting system is battery powered.
(4) The emergency lighting equipment shall be fully operational for the duration of the tests required by 7.9.3.1.1(2) and7.9.3.1.1(3).
(5) Written records of visual inspections and tests shall be kept by the owner for inspection by the authority having jurisdiction.
7.9.3.1.2
Testing of required emergency lighting systems shall be permitted to be conducted as follows:
(1) Self-testing/self-diagnostic battery-operated emergency lighting equipment shall be provided.
(2) Not less than once every 30 days, self-testing/self-diagnostic battery-operated emergency lighting equipment shall automaticallyperform a test with a duration of a minimum of 30 seconds and a diagnostic routine.
(3) Self-testing/self-diagnostic battery-operated emergency lighting equipment shall indicate failures by a status indicator.
(4) A visual inspection shall be performed at intervals not exceeding 30 days.
(5) Functional testing shall be conducted annually for a minimum of 1 1⁄2 hours.
(6) Self-testing/self-diagnostic battery-operated emergency lighting equipment shall be fully operational for the duration of the 1 1⁄2-hour test.
(7) Written records of visual inspections and tests shall be kept by the owner for inspection by the authority having jurisdiction.
7.9.3.1.3
Testing of required emergency lighting systems shall be permitted to be conducted as follows:
(1) Computer-based, self-testing/self-diagnostic battery-operated emergency lighting equipment shall be provided.
(2) Not less than once every 30 days, emergency lighting equipment shall automatically perform a test with a duration of a minimumof 30 seconds and a diagnostic routine.
(3) The emergency lighting equipment shall automatically perform annually a test for a minimum of 1 1⁄2 hours.
(4) The emergency lighting equipment shall be fully operational for the duration of the tests required by 7.9.3.1.3(2) and7.9.3.1.3(3).
(5) The computer-based system shall be capable of providing a report of the history of tests and failures at all times.
7.9.3.1.4
Testing of required emergency lighting systems shall be permitted to be conducted in accordance with 7.9.2.4.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
It appears there was an error in the Terra System that mixed our original proposal for lighting testing only with proposals for stair shaft illumination concepts. This response is prepared as a placeholder for re-submittal for the next revision cycle. For this revision cycle we would like to exempt elementary school buildings that have only one summer occupant -- the maintenance mechanic -- from having to test all the emergency lighting when no one but he or she is in the school building.
Related Item
Public Input No. 374-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.9.1.1]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Michael Anthony
Organization: University of Michigan
Affilliation: University of Michigan
Street Address:
* The test interval shall be permitted to be extended beyond 30 days with the approval of the authority having jurisdiction.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
36 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 65 of 120
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon May 16 15:20:39 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
37 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 66 of 120
Public Comment No. 200-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 7.15 ]
7.15 Occupant Evacuation Elevators.
7.15.1 General.
7.15.1.1*
Where passenger elevators for general public use are permitted to be used for occupant evacuation prior to Phase I EmergencyRecall Operation mandated by the firefighters’ emergency operation provisions of ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevatorsand Escalators, the elevator system shall also comply with this section, except as otherwise permitted by 7.15.1.2.
7.15.1.2
The provisions of Section 7.15 shall not apply where the limited or supervised use of elevators for evacuation is part of a formal orinformal evacuation strategy, including the relocation or evacuation of patients in health care occupancies and the relocation orevacuation of occupants with disabilities in other occupancies.
7.15.1.3*
The occupant evacuation elevators shall be in accordance with the occupant evacuation operation (OEO) requirements of ASMEA17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, and the building emergency action plan required by 7.15.3.1.
7.15.1.4
Occupant evacuation elevators in accordance with Section 7.15 shall not be permitted to satisfy requirements of this Codeapplicable to the following:
(1) Number of means of egress
(2) Capacity of means of egress
(3) Arrangement of means of egress
7.15.2 Reserved.
7.15.3 Information Features.
7.15.3.1*
An emergency action plan approved by the authority having jurisdiction shall be implemented, specifically including the proceduresfor occupant evacuation using the exit stairs and the occupant evacuation elevators.
7.15.3.2
Occupant evacuation elevators shall be marked with signage indicating the elevators are suitable for use by building occupants forevacuation during fires.
7.15.3.3 Conditions for Safe Continued Operation.
7.15.3.3.1
Conditions necessary for the continued safe operation of the occupant evacuation elevators and the associated elevator lobbies andelevator machine rooms shall be continuously monitored and displayed at the building fire command center by a standardemergency service interface system meeting the requirements of NFPA 72 and NEMA SB 30, Fire Service Annunciator andInterface.
7.15.3.3.2
The monitoring and display required by 7.15.3.3.1 shall include all of the following:
(1) Floor location of each elevator car
(2) Direction of travel of each elevator car
(3) Status of each elevator car with respect to whether it is occupied
(4) Status of normal power to the elevator equipment, elevator controller cooling equipment, and elevator machine room ventilationand cooling equipment
(5) Status of standby or emergency power system that provides backup power to the elevator equipment, elevator controllercooling equipment, and elevator machine/control room or machinery/control space ventilation and cooling equipment
(6) Activation of any fire alarm–initiating device in any elevator lobby, elevator machine/control room or machinery/control space, orelevator hoistway
7.15.3.4
The building fire command center location specified in 7.15.3.3.1 shall be provided with a means to override normal elevatoroperation and to initiate manually a Phase I emergency recall operation of the occupant evacuation elevators in accordance withASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators.
7.15.4 Fire Detection, Alarm, and Communication.
7.15.4.1
The building shall be protected throughout by an approved fire alarm system in accordance with Section 9.6.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
38 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 67 of 120
7.15.4.2*
The fire alarm system shall include an emergency voice/alarm communication system in accordance with NFPA 72 with the ability toprovide voice directions on a selective basis to any building floor.
7.15.4.3*
The emergency voice/alarm communication system shall be arranged so that intelligible voice instructions are audible in the elevatorlobbies under conditions where the elevator lobby doors are in the closed position.
7.15.4.4 Two-way Communication System.
A two-way communication system shall be provided in each occupant evacuation elevator lobby for the purpose of initiatingcommunication with the fire command center or an alternative location approved by the fire department.
7.15.4.4.1 Design and Installation.
The two-way communication system shall include audible and visible signals and shall be designed and installed in accordance withthe requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1, Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities.
7.15.4.4.2 Instructions.
7.15.4.4.2.1
Instructions for the use of the two-way communication system, along with the location of the station, shall be permanently locatedadjacent to each station.
7.15.4.4.2.2
Signage for instructions shall comply with the requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1, Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, forvisual characters.
7.15.5 Sprinklers.
7.15.5.1
The building shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 9.7.1.1(1),except as otherwise specified in 7.15.5.1.1 through 7.15.5.3.
7.15.5.1.1
A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor.
7.15.5.1.2
The sprinkler control valves and waterflow devices required by 7.15.5.1.1 shall be monitored by the building fire alarm system.
7.15.5.2*
Sprinklers shall not be installed in elevator machine/control rooms and machinery/control spaces serving occupant evacuationelevators, and such prohibition shall not cause an otherwise fully sprinklered building to be classified as nonsprinklered.
7.15.5.3*
Where a hoistway serves occupant evacuation elevators, sprinklers shall not be installed at the top of the elevator hoistway or atother points in the hoistway more than 24 in. (610 mm) above the pit floor, and such prohibition shall not cause the building to beclassified as nonsprinklered.
7.15.6 Elevator Installation.
7.15.6.1
Except as modified by 7.15.6.2 and 7.15.6.3, occupant evacuation elevators shall be installed in accordance with ASME A17.1/CSAB44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, including the provisions for occupant evacuation operation, as required by 7.15.1.3.
7.15.6.2*
Shunt breakers shall not be installed on elevator systems used for occupant evacuation.
7.15.6.3
Occupant evacuation elevators shall be limited to passenger elevators that are located in noncombustible hoistways and for whichthe car enclosure materials meet the requirements of ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators.
7.15.7 Elevator Machine/Control Rooms and Machinery/Control Spaces.
7.15.7.1*
Elevator machine/control rooms and machinery/control spaces associated with occupant evacuation elevators shall be separatedfrom all building areas, other than elevator hoistways, by minimum 2-hour fire resistance–rated construction.
7.15.7.2*
Elevator machine/control rooms and machinery/control spaces associated with occupant evacuation elevators shall be used for nopurpose other than elevator machine/control rooms and machinery/control spaces.
7.15.8 Electrical Power and Control Wiring.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
39 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 68 of 120
7.15.8.1
The following features associated with occupant evacuation elevators shall be supplied by both normal power and Type 60, Class 2,Level 1 standby power:
(1) Elevator equipment
(2) Ventilation and cooling equipment for elevator machine/control rooms and machinery/control spaces
(3) Elevator car lighting
7.15.8.2
Wires or cables that are located outside elevator hoistways, machine/control rooms, and machinery/control spaces, and that providenormal power, standby power, control signals, communication with the cars, lighting, heating, air-conditioning, ventilation, and firedetecting systems to occupant evacuation elevators shall be protected by one of the following means, except as otherwise providedin 7.15.8.3:
(1) The wiring shall utilize Type CI cable with a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rating.
(2) The wiring shall be enclosed in a minimum 2-hour fire resistance construction.
(3) The wiring shall be wiring that is approved as providing a 2-hour performance alternative.
7.15.8.3*
Control signaling wiring and cables that do not serve Phase II emergency in-car service shall not be required to be protected.
7.15.9 Occupant Evacuation Shaft System.
7.15.9.1
Occupant evacuation elevators shall be provided with an occupant evacuation shaft system consisting of all of the following:
(1) Elevator hoistway
(2) Enclosed elevator lobby outside the bank or group of hoistway doors on each floor served by the elevators, with the exceptionthat elevator lobbies not be required to be enclosed where located either on the street floor or level of exit discharge
(3) Enclosed exit stair with doors to all floors, at and above grade level, served by the elevators
7.15.9.2* Elevator Lobby Size.
7.15.9.2.1
Occupant evacuation elevator lobbies shall have minimum floor area, except as otherwise provided in 7.15.9.2.2, as follows:
(1) The elevator lobby floor area shall accommodate, at 3 ft2 (0.28 m2) per person, a minimum of 25 percent of the occupant loadof the floor area served by the lobby.
(2) The elevator lobby floor area also shall accommodate one wheelchair space of 30 in. × 48 in. (760 mm × 1220 mm) for each 50persons, or portion thereof, of the occupant load of the floor area served by the lobby.
7.15.9.2.2
The size of lobbies serving multiple banks of elevators shall be exempt from the requirement of 7.15.9.2.1(1), provided that the areaof such lobbies is approved on an individual basis and is consistent with the building’s emergency action plan.
7.15.9.3
Access to the exit stair required by 7.15.9.1(3) shall be directly from the enclosed elevator lobby on each floor.
7.15.9.4
The occupant evacuation shaft system shall be enclosed and separated from the remainder of the building by walls complying withthe following:
(1) The shaft system walls shall be smoke barriers in accordance with Section 8.5.
(2) The shaft system walls separating the elevator lobby from the remainder of the building shall have a minimum 1-hour fireresistance rating and minimum 3⁄4-hour fire protection–rated opening protectives.
(3) The shaft system walls separating the elevator hoistway from the remainder of the building shall have a minimum 2-hour fireresistance rating and minimum 11⁄2-hour fire protection–rated opening protectives.
(4) The shaft system walls separating the enclosed exit stair from the remainder of the building shall have a minimum 2-hour fireresistance rating and minimum 11⁄2-hour fire protection–rated opening protectives.
7.15.9.5
Occupant evacuation shaft system enclosures shall be constructed to provide a minimum of classification Level 2 in accordance withASTM C1629/C1629M, Standard Classification for Abuse-Resistant Nondecorated Interior Gypsum Panel Products and Fiber-Reinforced Cement Panels.
7.15.9.6*
An approved method to prevent water from infiltrating into the hoistway enclosure from the operation of the automatic sprinklersystem outside the enclosed occupant evacuation elevator lobby shall be provided.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
40 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 69 of 120
7.15.9.7
Occupant evacuation shaft system elevator lobby doors, other than doors to the hoistway, exit stair enclosure, control room, orcontrol space, shall have all of the following features:
(1) The doors shall have a fire protection rating of not less than ¾ hour.
(2) The doors shall be smoke leakage–rated assemblies in accordance with NFPA 105.
(3) The doors shall have an automatic positioning bottom seal to resist the passage of water at floor level from outside the shaftsystem.
7.15.9.8
Occupant evacuation shaft system elevator lobby doors shall have the following features:
(1) Each door, other than doors to the hoistway, exit stair enclosure, control room, or control space, shall be automatic-closing inaccordance with 7.2.1.8.2, as modified by 7.15.9.8(2).
(2) In addition to the automatic-closing means addressed by 7.2.1.8.2, the elevator lobby door on any floor shall also close inresponse to any alarm signal initiated on that floor.
(3) Each door shall be provided with a vision panel arranged to allow people on either side of the door to view conditions on theother side of the door.
7.15.9.9
Each occupant evacuation shaft system exit stair enclosure door shall be provided with a vision panel arranged to allow people oneither side of the door to view conditions on the other side of the door.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
While we are supportive of the committee resolution on this proposal, we see the proposers concept as one that could convey some architectural costs (assocaated with building fire resistant elevator shafts) into the product safety realm where it is easier to articulate comparative costs. More work is needed at the product level, however, and we look forward to seeing this proposal again in the next revision cycle; perhaps scaled down in its scope, however.
Note to committee: Section 7.15 now in the current version does not seem to agree with the proposer's Section 7.14.
Related Item
Public Input No. 330-NFPA 101-2015 [Section No. 7.14]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Michael Anthony
Organization: University of Michigan
Affilliation: @StandardsUMich
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon May 16 12:15:59 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
41 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM
Page 70 of 120
Committee Input No. 5017-NFPA 101-2015 [ Section No. 3.3.220 ]
3.3.220 Public Way.
A street, alley, or other similar parcel of land essentially open to the outside air deeded,dedicated, or otherwise permanently appropriated to the public for public use and having aclear width and height of not less than 10 ft (3050 mm). (SAF-MEA)
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Jul 28 12:06:30 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The committee recognizes that the definition of 'public way' requires refinementand plans to revisit the subject at the second draft stage.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
1 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 71 of 120
Committee Input No. 5018-NFPA 101-2015 [ Section No. 7.3.1.1.1 ]
7.3.1.1.1
The total capacity of the means of egress for any story, balcony, tier, or other occupied spaceshall be sufficient for the occupant load thereof unless one of the following conditions exists:
(1) The authority having jurisdiction shall be permitted to establish the occupant load asthe number of persons for which existing means of egress is adequate, provided thatmeasures are established to prevent occupancy by a greater number of persons .
(2)
.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Jul 28 12:35:40 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
This language is currently in Ch. 43 and is applicable only when renovation,modification, or reconstruction work occurs. There doesn't seem to be any reason tolimit its application to when rehabilitation work occurs.
ResponseMessage:
The egress capacity shall have been previously approved as being adequate.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
2 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 72 of 120
Committee Input No. 5038-NFPA 101-2015 [ Section No. 7.1.3.2.1 ]
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
3 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 73 of 120
7.1.3.2.1
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 74 of 120
Where this Code requires an exit to be separated from other parts of the building, theseparating construction shall meet the requirements of Section 8.2 and the following:
(1)
(2) The separation specified in 7.1.3.2.1 (1), other than an existing separation, shall besupported by construction having not less than a 1-hour fire resistance rating.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7) Reserved.
(8)The separation required by 7.1.3.2.1 (1) and 7.1.3.2.1 (3) shall not be required forstairs serving as a component of the means of egress when such stairs are locatedwithin either one of the following:
(9) Atriums complying with 8.6.7, with the following additional provisions:
(10) Lowest story of the atrium shall be at the level of exit discharge.
(11) Stairs within the atrium shall discharge at the level of exit discharge.
(12) Travel distance shall be measured to the top riser of the stairs that arelocated within the atrium.
(13) Communicating Space complying with 8.6.6, with the following additionalprovisions:
(14) Lowest story of the communicating space shall be at the level of exit discharge.
(15) Stairs shall discharge at the level of exit discharge.
(16) An engineering analysis is performed that demonstrates that
the building is designed to keep the smoke layer interface
above the highest unprotected opening to adjoining
spaces, or 6 ft (1830 mm) above the highest floor level of
exit access open to the communicating space, for a period equal to
1.5 times the calculated egress time or 20 minutes, whichever
is greater.
(1) .
(2) The minimum 2-hour fire resistance–rated separation required by 7.1.3.2.1 (3) shall beconstructed of an assembly of noncombustible or limited-combustible materials and shallbe supported by construction having a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rating, unless
* The separation shall have a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating where the exitconnects three or fewer stories.
* The separation shall have a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rating where the exitconnects four or more stories, unless one of the following conditions exists:
In existing non-high-rise buildings, existing exit stair enclosures shall have aminimum 1-hour fire resistance rating.
In existing buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 , existing exit stair enclosures shallhave a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating.
The minimum 1-hour enclosures in accordance with 28.2.2.1.2 , 29.2.2.1.2 ,30.2.2.1.2 , and 31.2.2.1.2 shall be permitted as an alternative to the requirementof 7.1.3.2.1 (3).
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
5 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 75 of 120
otherwise permitted by 7.1.3.2.1 (7).
(3)
(4) In Type III, Type IV, and Type V construction, as defined in NFPA 220, Standard on Typesof Building Construction (see 8.2.1.2), fire retardant–treated wood enclosed innoncombustible or limited-combustible materials shall be permitted.
(5) Openings in the separation shall be protected by fire door assemblies equipped with doorclosers complying with 7.2.1.8.
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18) Penetrations into, and openings through, an exit enclosure assembly shall be limited tothe following:
(19) Door assemblies permitted by 7.1.3.2.1 (9)
* Structural elements, or portions thereof, that support exit components and eitherpenetrate into a fire resistance–rated assembly or are installed within a fireresistance–rated wall assembly shall be protected, as a minimum, to the fire resistancerating required by 7.1.3.2.1 (1) or (3).
* Openings in exit enclosures shall be limited to door assemblies from normally occupiedspaces and corridors and door assemblies for egress from the enclosure, unless one ofthe following conditions exists:
Vestibules that separate normally unoccupied spaces from an exit enclosure shallbe permitted, provided the vestibule is separated from adjacent spaces by corridorwalls and related opening protectives as required for the occupancy involved but notless than a smoke partition in accordance with Section 8.4 .
In buildings of Type I or Type II construction, as defined in NFPA 220, Standard onTypes of Building Construction, (see 8.2.1.2) fire protection–rated door assembliesto normally unoccupied building service equipment support areas as addressed inSection 7.13 shall be permitted, provided the space is separated from the exitenclosure by fire barriers as required by 7.1.3.2.1 (3).
Openings in exit passageways in mall buildings as provided in Chapters 36 and37 shall be permitted.
In buildings of Type I or Type II construction, as defined in NFPA 220, Standard onTypes of Building Construction, (see 8.2.1.2) existing fire protection–rated doorassemblies to interstitial spaces shall be permitted, provided that such spaces meetall of the following criteria:
The space is used solely for distribution of pipes, ducts, and conduits.
The space contains no storage.
The space is separated from the exit enclosure in accordance with Section8.3 .
Existing openings to mechanical equipment spaces protected by approved existingfire protection–rated door assemblies shall be permitted, provided that the followingcriteria are met:
The space is used solely for non-fuel-fired mechanical equipment.
The space contains no storage of combustible materials.
The building is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 .
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
6 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 76 of 120
(20)
(21) Required exit door openings
(22) Ductwork and equipment necessary for independent stair pressurization
(23) Water or steam piping necessary for the heating or cooling of the exit enclosure
(24) Sprinkler piping
(25) Standpipes
(26) Existing penetrations protected in accordance with 8.3.5
(27) Penetrations for fire alarm circuits, where the circuits are installed in metal conduitand the penetrations are protected in accordance with 8.3.5
(28) Penetrations or communicating openings shall be prohibited between adjacent exitenclosures.
(29) Membrane penetrations shall be permitted on the exit access side of the exit enclosureand shall be protected in accordance with 8.3.5.6.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Aug 03 12:26:16 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The protection package required of a new atrium might be adequate to permit anopen stair to serve as an exit. The MEA committee is investigating this and will returnto the subject during the Second Draft preparation phase of the revision process.
ResponseMessage:
* Electrical conduit serving the exit enclosure
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
7 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 77 of 120
Committee Input No. 5039-NFPA 101-2015 [ Section No. 7.1.3.2.1 ]
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
8 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 78 of 120
7.1.3.2.1
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
9 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 79 of 120
Where this Code requires an exit to be separated from other parts of the building, theseparating construction shall meet the requirements of Section 8.2 and the following:
(1)
(2) The separation specified in 7.1.3.2.1 (1), other than an existing separation, shall besupported by construction having not less than a 1-hour fire resistance rating.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7) Reserved.
(8) The minimum 2-hour fire resistance–rated separation required by 7.1.3.2.1 (3) shall beconstructed of an assembly of noncombustible or limited-combustible materials and shallbe supported by construction having a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rating, unlessotherwise permitted by 7.1.3.2.1 (7).
(9)
(10)
(11) In Type III, Type IV, and Type V construction, as defined in NFPA 220, Standard on Typesof Building Construction (see 8.2.1.2), fire retardant–treated wood enclosed innoncombustible or limited-combustible materials shall be permitted.
(12) Openings in the separation shall be protected by fire door assemblies that meet all of the following:
(a) The door assemblies shall be equipped with door closers complying with7.2.1.8 .
(b) No door opening, other than approved existing openings, shall exceed 8 ft (2440mm) in width
(c) No door opening, other than approved existing openings, shall exceed 9 ft (2740mm) in height
.
(13)
* The separation shall have a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating where the exitconnects three or fewer stories.
* The separation shall have a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rating where the exitconnects four or more stories, unless one of the following conditions exists:
In existing non-high-rise buildings, existing exit stair enclosures shall have aminimum 1-hour fire resistance rating.
In existing buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 , existing exit stair enclosures shallhave a minimum 1-hour fire resistance rating.
The minimum 1-hour enclosures in accordance with 28.2.2.1.2 , 29.2.2.1.2 ,30.2.2.1.2 , and 31.2.2.1.2 shall be permitted as an alternative to the requirementof 7.1.3.2.1 (3).
*
The fire resistance–rated separation required by 7.1.3.2.1 (1) or 7.1.3.2.1(3), otherthan approved existing separations, shall be permanently fixed in place.
Structural elements, or portions thereof, that support exit components and eitherpenetrate into a fire resistance–rated assembly or are installed within a fireresistance–rated wall assembly shall be protected, as a minimum, to the fire resistancerating required by 7.1.3.2.1 (1) or (3).
* Openings in exit enclosures shall be limited to door assemblies from normally occupiedspaces and corridors and door assemblies for egress from the enclosure, unless one ofthe following conditions exists:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 80 of 120
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25) Penetrations into, and openings through, an exit enclosure assembly shall be limited tothe following:
(26) Door assemblies permitted by 7.1.3.2.1 (9)
(27)
(28) Required exit door openings
(29) Ductwork and equipment necessary for independent stair pressurization
(30) Water or steam piping necessary for the heating or cooling of the exit enclosure
(31) Sprinkler piping
(32) Standpipes
(33) Existing penetrations protected in accordance with 8.3.5
(34) Penetrations for fire alarm circuits, where the circuits are installed in metal conduitand the penetrations are protected in accordance with 8.3.5
(35) Penetrations or communicating openings shall be prohibited between adjacent exitenclosures.
Vestibules that separate normally unoccupied spaces from an exit enclosure shallbe permitted, provided the vestibule is separated from adjacent spaces by corridorwalls and related opening protectives as required for the occupancy involved but notless than a smoke partition in accordance with Section 8.4 .
In buildings of Type I or Type II construction, as defined in NFPA 220, Standard onTypes of Building Construction, (see 8.2.1.2) fire protection–rated door assembliesto normally unoccupied building service equipment support areas as addressed inSection 7.13 shall be permitted, provided the space is separated from the exitenclosure by fire barriers as required by 7.1.3.2.1 (3).
Openings in exit passageways in mall buildings as provided in Chapters 36 and37 shall be permitted.
In buildings of Type I or Type II construction, as defined in NFPA 220, Standard onTypes of Building Construction, (see 8.2.1.2) existing fire protection–rated doorassemblies to interstitial spaces shall be permitted, provided that such spaces meetall of the following criteria:
The space is used solely for distribution of pipes, ducts, and conduits.
The space contains no storage.
The space is separated from the exit enclosure in accordance with Section8.3 .
Existing openings to mechanical equipment spaces protected by approved existingfire protection–rated door assemblies shall be permitted, provided that the followingcriteria are met:
The space is used solely for non-fuel-fired mechanical equipment.
The space contains no storage of combustible materials.
The building is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 .
* Electrical conduit serving the exit enclosure
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
11 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 81 of 120
(36) Membrane penetrations shall be permitted on the exit access side of the exit enclosureand shall be protected in accordance with 8.3.5.6.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Aug 03 12:35:15 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The technical committee is concerned that horizontally sliding doors are being used asde facto walls for the enclosure of exit stairs. Exit stair enclosures must be reliablyseparated from the remainder of the floor in order to function as exits. Doors are anecessary evil as occupants must have access into and out of the enclosure; theopenings for such doors need to be limited in size to preserve the separation. Theseparation needs to be permanent as contrasted with having a horizontally-sliding doorthat has a fire resistance rating (like that awarded to wall assemblies) sit in its openposition where contents/furnishings or other obstructions might prevent the large openingfrom being closed off.
The MEA committee floats the idea as a CI in order to receive public comments so thecommittee can reevaluate the issue in the Second Draft preparation phase of the revisionprocess.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
12 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 82 of 120
Committee Input No. 5040-NFPA 101-2015 [ New Section after 7.7.6 ]
7.7.7 Discharge to Exterior Areas.
Where approved by the authority having jurisdiction, occupant travel to the public way shall bepermitted to lead to an exterior(open air) enclosed court and be delayed within the exitdischarge while the nature of the emergency is evaluated, provided all of the following criteriashall be met:
(1) Each area shall be of sufficient size to accommodate all occupants at a net area of
15 ft 2 (1.4 m 2 ) per person,
(2) Each area shall be located a distance of not less than 50 ft (15 m) from the building havingexited from,
(3) The area shall be continuously maintained free of obstructions or impediments to full instantuse in the case of fire or other emergency.
(4) A continuous and safe means of egress from the exterior (open air ) enclosed court area tothe public way without re-entering the building is available.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Aug 03 12:44:20 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The text would permit egress to be delayed within an exterior exit discharge area untiloccupants continue egress movement to the public way or reenter the building. Manyprivate and public buildings are now completely surrounded by fencing or courtyard wallsthat prevent free egress movement to the public way. This criteria mirrors a provisionpermitted within the Detention and Correctional Occupancy chapters. The MEAcommittee wants to be able to address the subject of this CI during the Second Draftpreparation phase of the revision process.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
13 of 13 10/21/2015 12:38 PM
Page 83 of 120
Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.150 ]
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
5000_CCN_3.pdf 5000 CC Note No. 3
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 3 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots of Pappas to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows. Suggested revision was made for 101, should be consistent for 5000.
Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA)
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 3-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 3.3.150]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC on BLD_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON BUILDING CODE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Thu Mar 03 16:20:59 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
39 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 84 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 3-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.150 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 13:47:40 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots ofPappas to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows. Suggested revision was made for 101, shouldbe consistent for 5000.
Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing.(SAF-MEA)
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
18 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
15 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Newman, Michael T.
Wooldridge, Jerry
Affirmative All
DiCristina, Salvatore
Frable, David W.
Francis, Sam W.
Hansen, Raymond N.
Harrington, John C.
Hopper, Howard
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Humble, Jonathan
Jones, Gerald H.
Leavitt, Russell B.
Quiter, James R.
Roberts, Richard Jay
Shah, Faimeen
Vinci, Leon F.
Willse, Peter J.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:47 PM
Page 85 of 120
Affirmative with Comment
Laramee, Scott T.
No comment, but no way to accept as "affirmative" without accepting all as "affirmative in the ballot portal.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:47 PM
Page 86 of 120
First Revision No. 6006-NFPA 5000-2015 [ New Section after 3.3.150 ]
3.3.151 Delayed Action Closer.
Self-closing device that incorporates a delay prior to the initiation of closing. Delayed action closers are mechanical devices with anadjustable delay. (BLD-MEA)
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-MEA
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Aug 03 15:27:36 EDT 2015
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
Delayed action closers are utilized in buildings. Proposing a definition to complement proposed text in new section after11.2.1.8.
Response Message:
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
30 Eligible Voters
4 Not Returned
25 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Di Pilla, Steven
Schwarzenberg, Roy W.
Tierney, Michael
Vander Roest, Nathan John
Affirmative All
Alles, Ryan
Badeau, Charles A.
Barlow, Charles V.
Bonisch, Warren D.
Bush, Kenneth E.
Buuck, Daniel
Collins, David S.
Crowley, Michael A.
Day, Richard L.
Dove, Paul L.
Frable, David W.
Guest, Rita C.
Hoskins, Bryan Lawrence
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 5/26/2016 2:52 PM
Page 87 of 120
Jackson, Waymon
Lathrop, James K.
Nuschler, Gary L.
Pauls, Jake
Peacock, Richard D.
Perry, Robert R.
Quinterno, Vincent
Saks, Kenneth
Shulman, Michael S.
Simard, J. Francois
Versteeg, Joseph H.
de Vries, David A.
Affirmative with Comment
Pappas, Denise L.
The text shown for the definition of “Delayed Action Closer” Should be the same in both FR 6006 and FR 5009.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 5/26/2016 2:52 PM
Page 88 of 120
Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
5000_CCN_16.pdf 5000 CC Note #16 ✓
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 16 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to change the term “delayed egress electrically locking systems” to “delayed egress electrical locking systems” throughout the code.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 16-NFPA 5000-2016 [Global Input]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC on BLD_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON BUILDING CODE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Mar 07 10:13:08 EST 2016
Copyright Assignment
I, CC on BLD_AAC, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both theProposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of theNFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power andauthority to enter into this copyright assignment.
By checking this box I affirm that I am CC on BLD_AAC, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. Iunderstand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as ahandwritten signature
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 1 5/23/2016 2:34 PM
Page 89 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 16-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 14:15:54 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to change the term “delayed egress electrically lockingsystems” to “delayed egress electrical locking systems” throughout the code.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
18 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
15 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Newman, Michael T.
Wooldridge, Jerry
Affirmative All
DiCristina, Salvatore
Frable, David W.
Francis, Sam W.
Hansen, Raymond N.
Harrington, John C.
Hopper, Howard
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Humble, Jonathan
Jones, Gerald H.
Leavitt, Russell B.
Quiter, James R.
Roberts, Richard Jay
Shah, Faimeen
Vinci, Leon F.
Willse, Peter J.
Affirmative with Comment
Laramee, Scott T.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:44 PM
Page 90 of 120
No comment, but no way to accept as "affirmative" without accepting all as "affirmative in the ballot portal.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:44 PM
Page 91 of 120
First Revision No. 6036-NFPA 5000-2015 [ Global Input ]
Throughout the document, change “door electrically controlled egress door assemblies” to “hardware-release of electricallylocked egress door assemblies”.
Throughout the document, change “delayed-egress locking systems” to “delayed-egress electrically locking systems”.
Throughout the document, change "access-controlled egress door(s)" or “access-controlled egress door assemblies” to“sensor-release of electrical locking systems”.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-MEA
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Aug 04 12:55:13 EDT 2015
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The terms are being renamed in their related provisions in Chapter 11. Correlative updating of terms is needed throughoutthe document to keep the terminology consistent.
ResponseMessage:
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
30 Eligible Voters
4 Not Returned
26 Affirmative All
0 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Di Pilla, Steven
Schwarzenberg, Roy W.
Tierney, Michael
Vander Roest, Nathan John
Affirmative All
Alles, Ryan
Badeau, Charles A.
Barlow, Charles V.
Bonisch, Warren D.
Bush, Kenneth E.
Buuck, Daniel
Collins, David S.
Crowley, Michael A.
Day, Richard L.
Dove, Paul L.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 5/26/2016 2:53 PM
Page 92 of 120
Frable, David W.
Guest, Rita C.
Hoskins, Bryan Lawrence
Jackson, Waymon
Lathrop, James K.
Nuschler, Gary L.
Pappas, Denise L.
Pauls, Jake
Peacock, Richard D.
Perry, Robert R.
Quinterno, Vincent
Saks, Kenneth
Shulman, Michael S.
Simard, J. Francois
Versteeg, Joseph H.
de Vries, David A.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 5/26/2016 2:53 PM
Page 93 of 120
Public Comment No. 71-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.682.1 ]
3.3.682.1 Public Way.
A street, alley, or other similar parcel of land essentially open to the outside air deeded, dedicated, or otherwise permanentlyappropriated to the public for public use and having a clear width and height of not less than 10 ft (3050 mm). (BLD-MEA)
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
This comment does is not recommending any change to the definition. The BCDC wants to comment that as drafted, CI 6032 would remove text that is an important part of the definition. The text that the CI identified as deleting is essential to the definition of “public way” because it is the part that refers to the “public” aspect of a “public way.”
Related Item
Committee Input No. 6032-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 3.3.677.1]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir
Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington
Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue May 10 17:36:04 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
41 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 94 of 120
Public Comment No. 76-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.1.5.1 ]
11.1.5.1
Means of egress shall be designed and maintained to provide headroom in accordance with other sections of this Code, and suchheadroom shall be not less than 7 ft 6 in. (2285 mm), with projections . Projections from the ceiling not shall provide a headroomof not less than 6 ft 8 in. (2030 m), with a tolerance of - 3⁄4 in. (-19 mm), above the finished floor.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
This comment corrects the text of the provision. Currently the text suggests that a projection may be 6ft 8 in, when it really means that the vertical clearance should not be less than 6 ft 8 in above finished floor. It should be noted that this provision seems to consider door headers to be projections, which they are not. Door openings and clearances are already addressed under accessibility codes. The tolerance issue is not recommended to be deleted, as it was in the Public Input.
Related Item
Public Input No. 128-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.1.5.1]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir
Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington
Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue May 10 18:20:34 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
86 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 95 of 120
Public Comment No. 92-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.1.6.5 ]
11.1.6.5 *
Grab Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.
11.1.6.5.
1 General1 General .
11.1.6.5.1.1
Where Where required by Chapters 15 through 31 , new bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers
, for use by occupants,shall be provided with grab bars
complying with.
11.1.6.5.
2 through 11.1.
6.5.5, except as otherwise permitted for showers in 11.1.
6.5.1.2, with all dimensions referring to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stipulated.
11.1.6.5.1.2 *
Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding1 * Grab bars are not required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13mm)
, as described in 11.1.6.2 , and it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as a foreseeable condition described inin height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet.
11.1.6.
4, the requirements of5.1.2 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5
shall apply only if grab bars are installed.
11.1.6.5.1.3 All dimensions are measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stated .
11.1.6.5.
2 Vertical2 Vertical Grab Bar.
A vertical grab bar shall be provided
either installedon the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,
andor shower ; or ,
as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.1 , or as a free standing, external pole as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.2 .shall be provided as an external vertical pole.
11.1.6.5.2.1 *
Vertical Vertical Grab Bar on
ControlEnd Wall.
(A
) Avertical grab bar
, with a minimum length ofshall be:
(1) 24 in. (610 mm)
, and its lower end
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
87 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 96 of 120
(1) minimum in length;
(2) located between 36 and 39 in. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished floor
, shall be
(1) measured to its lower end;
(2) installed on the
entry/egress
(1) open side of the
control end wall of the
(1) bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,
and shower unit.
(B)
The grab bar shall be located at least 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, from any shower curtain rod fixing point on the wall
(1) or shower used for entry and egress; and
(2) located 9 in. (228 mm) minimum and 12 in. (300 mm) maximum from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, orshower .
Vertical Grab Bar as Free Standing, Vertical11.1.6.5.2.2 *
External Vertical Pole.
A vertical, pole-type grab bar shall be fixed to the floor and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shall be :
(1) installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit ;
(2) located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally
,
(1) of the outside of the outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower ; and
(2) located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally
,
(1) of the vertical plane of the control end wall
if there is such a wall
(1) .
11.1.6.5.3
Back Wall Grab Bar.
For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on three sides by walls, a diagonal or horizontal grab bar shall be providedon the back wall
either as a diagonal grab bar as specified in 11.
1.6.5.3.1 or as a horizontal grab bar as specified in 11.1.6.5.3.2 .
11.1.6.5.3.1 *
Diagonal Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall.
(A)
A A diagonal grab bar shall be
installed on the back wall with a minimum length of:
(1) 24 in. (600 mm)
with
(1) minimum in length;
(2) located so that its higher end
placed closer
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
88 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 97 of 120
(1) is closest to the control end wall
and
(1) ;
(2) located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall,
with a height of
(1)
(2) located 25 in.
to
(1) (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (635 mm
to
(1) and 685 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub
.
(B)
The lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height of 8 in. to
(1) ;
(2) located so that its lower end is 8 in. minimum and 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub ; and
(3) located 28 in.
to
(1) (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (710 mm
to
(1) and 760 mm) maximum from the control end wall.
11.1.6.5.3.
2 2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall.
A horizontal grab bar shall be
installed on the back wall at a height of:
(1) located 8 in.
to
(1) (205 mm) minimum and 10 in. (
205 mm to
(1) 255 mm) maximum high above the bathtub rim
with
(1) ; and
(2) located so that one end
located a maximum of
(1) is 12 in. (305 mm) maximum from the control end wall and the other end is located
a maximum of
(1) 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub.
11.1.6.5.4 *
Grab Bar Details.
11.1.6.5.4.1
Grab Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1
1 ⁄ 41⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).
11.1.6.5.4.
2 If2 Where attached to a wall,
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
89 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 98 of 120
thegrab
barbars shall provide a
minimumclearance for hand grasp of 1
1 ⁄ 21⁄2 in. (38 mm)
.
11.1.6.5.4.3
The size and clearance dimensions required by 11.1.6.5.4.1 and 11.1.6.5.4.2 shall be provided, as aminimum
, within the height requirements range and the minimum length requirements range of the other provisions of 11.
1.6.5.
11.1.6.5.
5 Grab5 Grab Bar Structural Loading.
Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with other provisions of this Code .
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
Grab_Bars-Legislative_Text_4-25-16.docx Word Doc in legislative text to more clearly show the proposed changes.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NFPA's Disability Access Review and Advisory Committee (DARAC) supports the concept of the first revision but has voted unanimously to propose re-writing the section so that it is workable, clear, and concise.
Related Item
First Revision No. 6011-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 11.1.6.4]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Allan Fraser
Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc
Affilliation: Staff Liaison for NFPA's Disabity Access Review and Advisory Committee (DARAC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed May 11 10:26:33 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
90 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 99 of 120
11.1.6.5 * Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.
11.1.6.5.1 General. 11.1.6.5.1.1 Where required by Chapters 15 through 31, new bathtubs, bathtub-shower
combinations, and showers, for use by occupants, shall be provided with grab bars complying.
11.1.6.5.1.1.1* Grab bars are not required in showers where the transition from the room floor to
the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13 mm) in height and all shower surfaces are slip
resistant when wet.
11.1.6.5.1.2 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5, except as
otherwise permitted for showers in .
11.1.6.5.1.2, with all3 All dimensions referringare measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless
otherwise stipulatedstated.
11.1.6.5.1.2* Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding 0.5 inch (13 mm),
as described in 11.1.6.2, and, it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as described in 11.1.6.4, the requirements of 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5 shall apply only if grab bars are installed.
11.1.6.5.2 Vertical Grab Bar. A vertical grab bar shall be provided and shall be installed either on
the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination or shower as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.1 or as a
free standing, external pole as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.2. 11.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on Control End Wall.
(A) A vertical grab bar, the end wall opposite the 24 in. (610 mm) long minimum, shall be installed on the
entry/egress side of the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit.
The lower end of the grab bar; or, shall be provided as an external vertical pole.
11.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on End Wall.
A vertical grab bar shall be:
1. 24 in. (610 mm) minimum in length;
1.2. located between 36 in. min. and 39 in. max. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished
floor. measured to its lower end;
3. (B) The grab bar shall be installed on the open side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower
combination, or shower used for entry and egress; and
2.4.located at least 69 in. (150228 mm),) minimum and 12 in. (300 mm) maximum
from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,
or shower, measured horizontally, from any the exterior plane of the bathtub,
bathtub-shower curtain rod fixing point on the wallcombination, or shower.
11.1.6.5.2.2* Vertical Grab Bar as Floor MountedExternal Vertical Pole. A vertical, pole-type grab
bar shall be fixed to the floor and, either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall. The vertical bar and
shall be :
1. installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit;
Page 100 of 120
2. located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally from of the outside of the
outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination or shower. Where a control end
wall is provided, the vertical grab bar shall be , or shower; and
1.3.located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally fromof the vertical plane of
the control end wall.
11.1.6.5.3 Back Wall Grab Bar. For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on
three sides by walls, a grab bar shall be provided on the back wall either as a diagonal grab bar as specified in
11.1.6.5.3.1 or as aor horizontal grab bar as specified in shall be provided on the back wall.
11.1.6.5.3.2.
11.1.6.5.3.1* 1* Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall. (A) A diagonal grab bar shall be installed on the back wall with a minimum length of :
1. 24 in. (600 mm) withminimum in length;
2. located so that its higher end placed closeris closest to the control end wall and ;
3. located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall, with a height of
1.4.located 25 toin. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (635 tomm and 685 mm)
maximum above the rim of the bathtub.;
5. (B) The located so that its lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height ofis
8 toin. minimum and 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) maximum above the rim of the
bathtub; and
2.6.located 28 toin. (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (710 tomm and 760 mm)
maximum from the control end wall.
11.1.6.5.3.2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall. A horizontal grab bar shall be installed on the
back wall at a height of:
1. located 8 in. min.(205 mm) minimum and 10 in. max (205 and (255 mm) maximum
high above the bathtub rim. One; and
1.2.located so that one end of the grab bar shall be located a maximum ofis 12 in. (305 mm)
maximum from the control end wall and the other end shall beis located a maximum
of 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite (, or head), end of the bathtub.
11.1.6.5.4* Grab Bar Details.
11.1.6.5.4.1 Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1/⁄4 in.
(32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).
11.1.6.5.4.2 If, Where attached to a wall, the grab barbars shall provide a minimum clearance, for
hand grasp, of 1 1/⁄2 inchesin. (38 mm).) minimum.
11.1.6.5.4.3 The size and clearance dimensions required by 11.1.6.5.4.1 and 11.1.6.5.4.2 Grab Bar Structural
Loading. Grab bars shall be provided, as a minimum, within the height requirements ranger and the minimum
length requirements range of thedesigned and constructed to the structural loading conditions in
accordance with other provisions of 11.1.6.5this Code.
Page 101 of 120
Public Comment No. 77-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.1.2 ]
11.2.1.1.2
Every door opening and every principal entrance that is required to serve as an exit shall be designed and constructed so that theway path of egress travel is obvious and direct. Windows that, because of their physical configuration or design and the materialsused in their construction, have the potential to be mistaken for door openings shall be made inaccessible to the occupants bybarriers or railings.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The term “path” is used more commonly, such as in section 3.3 for definitions, section 11.1 for means of egress, section 12.2 for accessibility, and chapter 16 for common paths of travel, etc.
Related Item
Public Input No. 129-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.1.1.2]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir
Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington
Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue May 10 18:24:37 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
91 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 102 of 120
Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.5.3 ]
11.2.1.5.3
Locks, if provided, shall not require the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort for operation from the egress side.
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
5000_CCN_17.pdf 5000 CC Note #17
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 17 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review the additional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FR 3004.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 17-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 11.2.1.5.3]
First Revision No. 3004-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC on BLD_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON BUILDING CODE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Mar 07 10:23:07 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
92 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 103 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 17-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 11.2.1.5.3 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 14:45:11 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review theadditional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FR 3004.
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
18 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
15 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Newman, Michael T.
Wooldridge, Jerry
Affirmative All
DiCristina, Salvatore
Frable, David W.
Francis, Sam W.
Hansen, Raymond N.
Harrington, John C.
Hopper, Howard
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Humble, Jonathan
Jones, Gerald H.
Leavitt, Russell B.
Quiter, James R.
Roberts, Richard Jay
Shah, Faimeen
Vinci, Leon F.
Willse, Peter J.
Affirmative with Comment
Laramee, Scott T.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:05 PM
Page 104 of 120
No comment, but no way to accept as "affirmative" without accepting all as "affirmative in the ballot portal.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:05 PM
Page 105 of 120
First Revision No. 3004-NFPA 5000-2015 [ New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3 ]
17.2.2.2.4 Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry.
Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The locking means is approved.
(2) The locking means can be engaged without opening the door.
(3) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key or tool.
(4) The unlocking and unlatching requires not more than one releasing operation.
(5) The unlocking and unlatching means are mounted at a height not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor.
(6) Locks, if remotely engaged, can be unlocked from the classroom side.
(7) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key or other credential.
(8) The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware.
(9) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80 .
(10) An emergency action plan shall be provided, addressing the use of the locking and unlocking means, from within and outsidethe room.
(11) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of emergencyegress drills.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-END
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Wed Sep 02 07:53:28 CDT 2015
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security – Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors againstunwanted entry. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 17.2.2.2.4 cover the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safemanner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace bythose unfamiliar with traditional egress needs.
ResponseMessage:
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
24 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
20 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
1 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Hopper, Howard
Upton, Billy E.
Affirmative All
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 5/26/2016 2:57 PM
Page 106 of 120
Aaby, Mark J.
Biddle, Judy
Dannaway, Samuel S.
Day, Richard L.
Dubrowski, Victor L.
Frangiamore, Keith S.
Haidacher, Jeffrey L.
Jenkins, Christopher M.
Kasmauskas, Dominick G.
Lazebnik, Rosa
Longhitano, Alfred J.
Marks, Maria B.
Merck, Richard E.
Savage, Sr., Michael L.
Shirey, Jeffrey
Sinsigalli, Michael L.
Stashak, Catherine L.
Szachnowicz, Aleksy L.
Wassom, Mark S.
Wolf, Ann Marie A.
Affirmative with Comment
Mertens, Matthew J.
Very Necessary guidance for the field.
Negative with Comment
Roeper, Kurt A.
Item #1 - Locking systems should be 'listed and labeled', not approved Item #3 - the term “special knowledge or effort”, as required in 7.2.1.5.3,should be used instead of 'use of a key or tool' Item #5 - Operable parts of releasing mechanisms should be located between 34" and 48"
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 5/26/2016 2:57 PM
Page 107 of 120
Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.5.11 ]
11.2.1.5.11
Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:
(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before the other.
(2) Approved automatic flush bolts shall be used and arranged such that both of the following criteria are met:
(3) The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on theegress side of the door .
(4) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.
(5) The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egress sideof the door.
(6) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
5000_CCN_18.pdf 5000 CC Note No. 18
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 18 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider editorially revising Section 11.2.1.5.11 to eliminate duplicate requirements:
11.2.1.5.11 Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:
(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before the other.
(2) Approved automatic flush bolts shall be used and arranged such that both of the following criteria are met:
(a)The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egress side of the door.
(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. Change is consistent with Section 7.2.1.5.11 in NFPA 101.These actions will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 18-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 11.2.1.5.11]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC on BLD_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON BUILDING CODE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Mar 07 10:30:36 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
93 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 108 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 18-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.5.11 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 14:52:13 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider editorially revising Section 11.2.1.5.11 toeliminate duplicate requirements:
11.2.1.5.11 Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:
(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before theother.
(2) Approved automatic flush bolts shall be used and arranged such that both of the following criteria are met:
(a)The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egressside of the door.
(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.
Change is consistent with Section 7.2.1.5.11 in NFPA 101.
These actions will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
18 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
15 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Newman, Michael T.
Wooldridge, Jerry
Affirmative All
DiCristina, Salvatore
Frable, David W.
Francis, Sam W.
Hansen, Raymond N.
Harrington, John C.
Hopper, Howard
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Humble, Jonathan
Jones, Gerald H.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:06 PM
Page 109 of 120
Leavitt, Russell B.
Quiter, James R.
Roberts, Richard Jay
Shah, Faimeen
Vinci, Leon F.
Willse, Peter J.
Affirmative with Comment
Laramee, Scott T.
No comment, but no way to accept as "affirmative" without accepting all as "affirmative in the ballot portal.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:06 PM
Page 110 of 120
Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.7.1 ]
11.2.1.7.1
Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exit hardware, suchhardware shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of which extends across the cross bar orpush pad not less than one-half of the width of the door leaf.
(2) It shall be mounted not less than 34 in. (865 mm), and not more than 48 in. (1220 mm), above the floor.
(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad and latches.
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approved
5000_CCN_19.pdf 5000 CC Note #19
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 19 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to revise Section 11.2.1.7 to be consistent with changes made to Section 7.2.1.7 in NFPA 101 as follows:
11.2.1.7.1 Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exit hardware, such hardware shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of the cross bar or push pad not less than one-half of the width of the door leaf.
(2) It shall be mounted not less than 34 in. (865 mm), and not more than 48 in. (1220 mm), above the floor.
(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad and latches
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Related Item
Correlating Committee Note No. 19-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 11.2.1.7]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: CC on BLD_AAC
Organization: NFPA CC ON BUILDING CODE
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Mon Mar 07 10:44:22 EST 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
94 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 111 of 120
Correlating Committee Note No. 19-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.7 ]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: BLD-AAC
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 14:53:44 EST 2016
Committee Statement and Meeting Notes
CommitteeStatement:
The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to revise Section 11.2.1.7 to be consistent with changesmade to Section 7.2.1.7 in NFPA 101 as follows:
11.2.1.7.1 Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exithardware, such hardware shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of the cross bar or push pad not less thanone-half of the width of the door leaf.
(2) It shall be mounted not less than 34 in. (865 mm), and not more than 48 in. (1220 mm), above the floor.
(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad and latches
This action will be considered as a public comment.
Ballot Results
This item has passed ballot
18 Eligible Voters
2 Not Returned
15 Affirmative All
1 Affirmative with Comments
0 Negative with Comments
0 Abstention
Not Returned
Newman, Michael T.
Wooldridge, Jerry
Affirmative All
DiCristina, Salvatore
Frable, David W.
Francis, Sam W.
Hansen, Raymond N.
Harrington, John C.
Hopper, Howard
Hugo, Jeffrey M.
Humble, Jonathan
Jones, Gerald H.
Leavitt, Russell B.
Quiter, James R.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:08 PM
Page 112 of 120
Roberts, Richard Jay
Shah, Faimeen
Vinci, Leon F.
Willse, Peter J.
Affirmative with Comment
Laramee, Scott T.
No comment, but no way to accept as "affirmative" without accepting all as "affirmative in the ballot portal.
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...
2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:08 PM
Page 113 of 120
Public Comment No. 78-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.1.9.2 ]
11.2.1.9.2 Self-Closing or Self-Latching Door Leaf Operation.
Where door leaves are required to be self-closing or self-latching and are operated by power upon the approach of a person, or areprovided with power-assisted manual operation, they shall be permitted in the means of egress under the following conditions:
(1) Door leaves can be opened manually in accordance with 11.2.1.9.1 to allow egress travel in the event of power failure.
(2) Door leaves remain in the closed position, unless actuated or opened manually.
(3) When actuated, door leaves remain open for not more than 30 seconds.
(4) Door Upon operation of approved smoke detectors, door leaves held open for any period of time close — shall close and thepower-assist mechanism ceases to function — upon operation of approved shall be deactivated. The smoke detectors shall beinstalled in such a way as to detect smoke on either side of the door opening in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 72 .
(5) Door leaves required to be self-latching are either self-latching or become self-latching upon operation of approved smokedetectors per 11.2.1.9.2(4).
(6) Power-assisted swinging door assemblies shall comply with BHMA/ANSI A156.19, Power Assist and Low Energy PowerOperated Doors.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
As written, the provision is confusing. The use of hyphens amplifies the confusion. This clarifies the intent of the provision.
Related Item
Public Input No. 132-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.1.9.2]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir
Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington
Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue May 10 18:27:58 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
95 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 114 of 120
Public Comment No. 117-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 11.2.2.2.1.2 ]
TITLE OF NEW CONTENT
Type your content here ...
Add new section 11.2.2.2.1.2 as follows:
11.2.2.2.1.2 Emergency Stair Travel Devices
11.2.2.2.1.2.1 Number and Location.
11.2.2.2.1.2.1.1 All buildings that are two storys or more above grade and that are accessed by the public for goods and services, orthat have employees working on site, shall have an emergency stair travel device on each floor at each stairway.
11.2.2.2.1.2.1.2 There shall be one additional emergency stair travel device provided for each employee who will need to use one inan evacuation. These devices shall be located in the employee’s office or at the nearest stair to the employee’s office at theirdiscretion.
11.2.2.2.1.2.2 All devices shall comply with ANSI/RESNA ED-1: 2013 .
11.2.2.2.1.2.3 Storage cabinets for such devices shall not be permitted to be locked at any time.
11.2.2.2.1.2.4 One manual wheelchair shall be located at each stairway at the floor of discharge and available, without requiring theuser to have a key or special knowledge, such that a user of an emergency stair travel device can be transferred to the manualwheelchair to travel from the stairway at the floor of discharge to the outside.
11.2.2.2.1.2.5 All members of an emergency planning team , if one exists, and all personnel who will be occupants or operators ofthe device shall be trained at least once each year on using the device and transferring those who may need to use the device in anemergency.
Statement:
Most of this language was submitted as Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2]. In response to thecommittee’s comment, this Public Comment addresses the committee’s concern about office buildings and others that might not havethe public entering to obtain goods and services but simply has employees now, or may in the future, who have mobility disabilities.
The current Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2 - Reserved would become No. 11.2.2.2.1.3.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The proposed revision would increase the availability of emergency stair travel devices. Referencing of the ANSI/RESNA ED-1:2013 standard would ensure the quality of the devices provided.
Most of this language was submitted as Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2]. In response to the committee’s comment, this Public Comment addresses the committee’s concern about office buildings and others that might not have the public entering to obtain goods and services but simply has employees now, or may in the future, who have mobility disabilities.
Related Item
Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Glenn Hedman
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Sun May 15 21:22:34 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
96 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 115 of 120
Public Comment No. 79-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 11.2.2.2.3.2 ]
11.2.2.2.3.2
Spiral stairs shall be permitted, provided that all of the following criteria are met:
(1) Riser heights shall not exceed 7 in. (180 mm).
(2) The stairway shall have a tread depth of not less than 11 in. (280 mm) for a portion of the stairway width sufficient to provideegress capacity for the occupant load served in accordance with 11.3.3.1.
(3) At the outer side of the stairway, an additional 10 1⁄2 in. (265 mm) of width shall be provided clear to the other handrail, and thiswidth shall not be included as part of the required egress capacity.
(4) Handrails complying with 11.2.2.4 shall be provided on both sides of the spiral stairway.
(5) The inner handrail shall be located within 24 in. (610 mm), measured horizontally, of the point where a tread depth of not lessthan 11 in. (280 mm) is provided.
(6) The turn of the stairway shall be such that descending users have the outer handrail at their right side.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
Spiral staircases can be designed and specified in the clockwise and counter clockwise direction for the descending user. The handrail will be on the wider side of the tread in either case.
Related Item
Public Input No. 134-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.2.2.3.2]
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir
Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington
Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue May 10 18:33:30 EDT 2016
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
97 of 185 5/17/2016 1:23 PM
Page 116 of 120
Committee Input No. 6032-NFPA 5000-2015 [ Section No. 3.3.677.1 ]
3.3.677.1 Public Way.
A street, alley, or other similar parcel of land essentially open to the outside air deeded,dedicated, or otherwise permanently appropriated to the public for public use and having aclear width and height of not less than 10 ft (3050 mm). (BLD-MEA)
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Aug 04 11:23:53 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The committee recognizes that the definition of 'public way' requires refinementand plans to revisit the subject at the second draft stage.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
1 of 4 10/26/2015 2:18 PM
Page 117 of 120
Committee Input No. 6033-NFPA 5000-2015 [ New Section after 11.1.3.2.1.2 ]
11.1.3.2.1.3
The separation required by 11.1.3.2.1.1 and 11.1.3.2.1.2 shall not be required for stairs servingas a component of the means of egress where such stairs are located within either of thefollowing:
(a) Atriums complying with 8.12.3, with the following additional provisions:
i. Lowest story of the atrium shall be at the level of exit discharge.
ii. Stairs within the atrium shall discharge at the level of exit discharge.
iii. Travel distance shall be measured to the top riser of the stairs that are located within theatrium.
(b) Communicating space complying with 8.12.2, with the following additional provisions:
i. Lowest story of the communicating space shall be at the level of exit discharge.
ii. Stairs shall discharge at the level of exit discharge.
iii. An engineering analysis shall be performed that demonstrates that the building is designedto keep the smoke layer interface above the highest unprotected opening to adjoining spaces, or6 ft (1830 mm) above the highest floor level of exit access open to the communicating space, fora period equal to 1.5 times the calculated egress time or 20 minutes, whichever is greater.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Aug 04 11:37:33 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The protection package required of a new atrium might be adequate to permit anopen stair to serve as an exit. The MEA committee is investigating this and will returnto the subject during the Second Draft preparation phase of the revision process.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
2 of 4 10/26/2015 2:18 PM
Page 118 of 120
Committee Input No. 6034-NFPA 5000-2015 [ Sections 11.1.3.2.1.4, 11.1.3.2.1.5
]
Sections 11.1.3.2.1.4, 11.1.3.2.1.5
11.1.3.2.1.4
One-hour enclosures in accordance with 24.2.2.1.2 and 25.2.2.1.2 shall be permitted as analternative to 11.1.3.2.1.2.
11.1.3.2.1.5
The fire resistance–rated separation required by 11.1.3.2.1 .1 or 11.1.3.2.1.2, shall bepermanently fixed in place.
11.1.3.2.1.6
Openings in the separation shall be protected by fire door assemblies that meet all of thefollowing:
(a) The door assemblies shall be equipped with door closers complying with 11.2.1.8.
(b) No door opening shall exceed 8 ft (2440 mm) in width
(c) No door opening shall exceed 9 ft (2740 mm) in height
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Aug 04 11:47:43 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The technical committee is concerned that horizontally sliding doors are being used asde facto walls for the enclosure of exit stairs. Exit stair enclosures must be reliablyseparated from the remainder of the floor in order to function as exits. Doors are anecessary evil as occupants must have access into and out of the enclosure; theopenings for such doors need to be limited in size to preserve the separation. Theseparation needs to be permanent as contrasted with having a horizontally-sliding doorthat has a fire resistance rating (like that awarded to wall assemblies) sit in its openposition where contents/furnishings or other obstructions might prevent the large openingfrom being closed off.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
3 of 4 10/26/2015 2:18 PM
Page 119 of 120
Committee Input No. 6035-NFPA 5000-2015 [ New Section after 11.7.6 ]
11.7.7 Discharge to Exterior Areas.
Where approved by the authority having jurisdiction, occupant travel to the public way shall bepermitted to lead to an exterior(open air) enclosed court and be delayed within the exitdischarge while the nature of the emergency is evaluated, provided all of the following criteriashall be met:
(1) Each area shall be of sufficient size to accommodate all occupants at a net area of
15 ft 2 (1.4 m 2 ) per person,
(2) Each area shall be located a distance of not less than 50 ft (15 m) from the building havingexited from,
(3) The area shall be continuously maintained free of obstructions or impediments to fullinstant use in the case of fire or other emergency.
(4) A continuous and safe means of egress from the exterior (open air ) enclosed court area tothe public way without re-entering the building is available.
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Ron Cote
Organization: [ Not Specified ]
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Submittal Date: Tue Aug 04 12:51:17 EDT 2015
Committee Statement
CommitteeStatement:
The text would permit egress to be delayed within an exterior exit discharge area untiloccupants continue egress movement to the public way or reenter the building. Manyprivate and public buildings are now completely surrounded by fencing or courtyard wallsthat prevent free egress movement to the public way. This criteria mirrors a provisionpermitted within the Detention and Correctional Occupancy chapters. The MEAcommittee wants to be able to address the subject of this CI during the Second Draftpreparation phase of the revision process.
ResponseMessage:
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4 of 4 10/26/2015 2:18 PM
Page 120 of 120