greenfield irrigation development public private partnerships
DESCRIPTION
Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships. Irrigation Australia 2014 Chris Thompson Managing Director , M acquarie Franklin. Background . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Greenfield Irrigation DevelopmentPublic Private Partnerships
Irrigation Australia 2014Chris Thompson
Managing Director , Macquarie Franklin
![Page 2: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background
• In Tasmania – we have approx 12% Australia surface water runoff – generally not where the usage is !! – predominance of stream diversion as method of irrigation supply
• Sustainable greenfield development in Tasmania is $2000 per ML upwards
• Irrigated agriculture is expanding rapidly• Existing supplies under stress
![Page 3: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Political Intervention to augment supplies and support water infrastructure
• Public – Private partnership as the way forward
![Page 4: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 9: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Why PPP When done properly• Best (I believe !) process to implement• Best method of valuing, managing and
apportioning risk – apply the risk to those who can appreciate/manage/afford it !!
![Page 10: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Risk issues– Approval Risks (EPBCA 1999 and the contingent outcomes in state acts)– Stakeholder Risks – ie “buy in” from irrigators and communities, government
instrumentalities and “third parties”– Financing risks – “impatient capital”, returns to investors, Project lifespans– Engineering risks – technical and budgeting risks – aggressive or conservative ?– Environmental Risks – real or perceived – often mismanaged and poorly understood– Agricultural risks – understanding future markets and needs– Climate risk !!!!! – impact on both water availability and growing conditions
![Page 11: Greenfield Irrigation Development Public Private Partnerships](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568165cb550346895dd8d5a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• The outcome• 5 projected completed 3 others underway• Around $350 M spent approx 60/40 Govt
private• All on time and under budget