green products and intention of consumers: overview point

12
ية]لعا امي% ا'س_قتصاد ا مجلةTo Index.. يناير/ لثاني اون كان80 د العد| 2019 Green Products and Intention of Consumers: Overview Point Akram M.Alhamad, Mohd Zukime Bin Hj. Mat Junoh & Tunku Salha binti Tunku Ahmad Universiti Malaysia Perlis, School of Business and entrepreneurship Green products and good is an essential strategy worldwide to save the climate and sustain the consuming of the natural resources via techniques including recycling ability, energy saving, eco and natural production. Therefore, the green products have been an important academic research topic for at least three decades. The paper explored issues related to the green products with on consumers’ behavioural intention. Also, to elaborate the importance of green products to indicating of their improvement. The application and mechanics green products discussed related to the implementation of the current practices of environmental green product improvement that adopted in firms. 1. Introduc/on Green marke+ng is producing and promo+ng reusable and eco-friendly products (Schiffman & Wisenblit 2014). Rise in issues of global warming and climate change have appeal consumers’ aHen+on towards green products which are safe for a sustainable environment. According to Gupta and Ogden (2009), the industry for green products was es+mated at over $200 billion in 2006. Various researchers have spurred interest in issues surrounding environmental conserva+on and protec+on in the marketplace (Mintel, 2006). Together, with the con+nuous rise of growing global concern about the environmental quality, green marke+ng has picked up momentum (Stafford, 2003; OHman et al., 2006). As highlighted by Papadopoulos et al. (2010), green marke+ng is expected to strengthen and influence the market even more in Greece and the “green market” counts about $250 billion in USA. The popula+on of Mauri+us comprising both consumers and producers has equally expressed increasing concerns about the environmental impact of products in the recent years (Juwaheer, 2005). Likewise, a wide range of green products including organic foods, recyclable paper, eco-light bulbs, eco broom, environmentally www.kie.university ( ) 24 www.kantakji.com

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

Green Products and Intention of Consumers: Overview Point

Akram M.Alhamad, Mohd Zukime Bin Hj. Mat Junoh & Tunku Salha binti Tunku Ahmad

Universiti Malaysia Perlis, School of Business and entrepreneurship

Green products and good is an essential strategy worldwide to save the climate and sustain the consuming of the natural resources via techniques including recycling ability, energy saving, eco and natural production. Therefore, the green products have been an important academic research topic for at least three decades. The paper explored issues related to the green products with on consumers’ behavioural intention. Also, to elaborate the importance of green products to indicating of their improvement. The application and mechanics green products discussed related to the implementation of the current practices of environmental green product improvement that adopted in firms.

1.Introduc/onGreen marke+ng is producing and promo+ng reusable and eco-friendly products(Schiffman&Wisenblit2014).Rise in issuesofglobalwarmingandclimatechangehave appeal consumers’ aHen+on towards green products which are safe for asustainable environment. According to Gupta and Ogden (2009), the industry forgreenproductswases+matedatover$200billionin2006.Variousresearchershavespurredinterestinissuessurroundingenvironmentalconserva+onandprotec+oninthemarketplace(Mintel,2006).Together,withthecon+nuousriseofgrowingglobalconcern about the environmental quality, green marke+ng has picked upmomentum(Stafford,2003;OHmanetal.,2006).AshighlightedbyPapadopoulosetal.(2010),greenmarke+ngisexpectedtostrengthenandinfluencethemarketevenmore in Greece and the “green market” counts about $250 billion in USA. Thepopula+on of Mauri+us comprising both consumers and producers has equallyexpressed increasing concerns about the environmental impact of products in therecent years (Juwaheer, 2005). Likewise, awide rangeof greenproducts includingorganic foods, recyclable paper, eco-light bulbs, eco broom, environmentally

www.kie.university ( � )24 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

designed tyres and eco-friendly detergents amongst others are now available inMauri+us. Hence, the emergence of green products can be seen throughout thedifferent industries in Mauri+us star+ng from the detergents industry to theautomobile industry. Similarly, different companies, like for example, Permoglaze,Mauvillac, Michelin and Toyota Mauri+us Ltd are con+nuously engaged in theprotec+on of the environment and are adop+ng green adver+sing strategies andprac+ces in Mauri+us. In this respect, there is considerable evidence that mostmarketsindevelopingeconomiesincludingMauri+ushavebeeninfluencedbygreenconsumer behaviour (Hardin, 1993;Mainieri and BarneH, 1997; Juwaheer, 2005).This “green trend” has given rise to a unique category of products: the green orenvironmentally friendly products. We should expect that the growingenvironmentalconcernandawarenesswouldbetranslatedintoagrowingdemandforgreenproductsandconsequentlyintoagrowingmarketshareforthiscategory.The interes+ngfacthere isthatthisdoesnotseemtobethecase.Eithertheyareself-proclaimedorgenuinelygreen, this categoryofproducts is yet to capture theshareofmarketthattheurgencyoftheenvironment’sdeteriora+ondictates(Ahma,2013; Kalafa+s et al., 1999). With the trendof going green, both consumers andbusinessesarewillingtomakethegreenstepforward.Nonetheless,Greenproductsand services are out there, environmentally concerned consumers are also outthere, but the market doesn’t seem to reflect or prove that the inten+ons andposi+ve agtudes of green consumers are translated into actual buying behavior(ahma, 2013; Kleiner, 1991; Schlossberg 1991; Gupta and Ogden, 2009). This gapmaybeaHributedtovariousreasons(GrimmerandBingham,2013):consumersmaybe more likely to shop based on tradi+onal product aHributes (e.g. price,performanceetc.),consumersmaynottrusttheenvironmentalclaimsofcompaniesand products or consumers may not have adequate environmental knowledge,concernorthenecessarycommitment.Generally, thegreenproductsareexpensivedueto lackofeconomiesofscaleandslowadop+onof cugngedgegreen technology (PolonskyandRosenberger,2001;OHman,2008;Kirmani&Khan,2015).Therefore,thesuccessofmarke+ngofgreenproducts depends upon the effec+veness of the marketers to convince theprospec+veconsumersthatthebenefitsaccruingfromecologicalsoundnessoftheproducts offset the addi+onal costs associated with the usage of these products.Although,achievingthisconvic+onamongtheconsumersisnotaneasytaskandit

www.kie.university ( � )25 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

requires deep knowledge of the factors which s+mulate environment-relatedemo+ons among the consumers (Thogersen, 2007; Windrum et al., 2009). Thepreviousstudieshavesuggestedthat lackofproperunderstandingofthesefactorsmay results into problems such as backlash in green marke+ng (Crane, 2000),problems of green spinning, green selling, green harves+ng, environpreneurmarke+ng and compliance marke+ng (Peage & Crane, 2005), green marke+ngmyopia (OHman et al., 2006) and six sins of greenmarke+ng (TerraChoice, 2007).Hence, marketers need to be aware of various factors affec+ng the greenpreferencesof the consumers.Anenhancedknowledgeof these factorswouldbeextremely useful for the marketers in dovetailing strategies for the marke+ng ofgreenproducts.

2.GreenProductsTheterms“green”or“sustainable”okenrefertoproducts,servicesorprac+cesthatallowforeconomicdevelopmentwhileconservingforfuturegenera+ons.Iprefertodescribeagreenproductasonethathaslessofanenvironmentalimpactorislessdetrimentaltohumanhealththanthetradi+onalproductequivalent. Whileonthetopicofdefiningagreenproduct,youmustrealizethatalmostnoproductwilleverbe 100% “green,” since all product development will have some impact on thesurrounding environment (Glavič & Lukman, 2007). Green products are energyefficient, durable and oken have low maintenance requirements; free of Ozonedeple+ng chemicals, toxic compounds and don’t produce toxic by-products; okenmadeofrecycledmaterialsorcontentor fromrenewableandsustainablesources;Obtainedfromlocalmanufacturersorresources,andbiodegradableoreasilyreusedeitherinpartorasawhole(Ashby,2016).Green products are characterized by organic food, recyclability, eco-friendlypackaging,non-toxicmaterial,biodegradability,energyefficiency,etc.(MangunandThurston, 2002; Bearse et al., 2009; Dangelico and Pontrandolfo, 2010; Massaweand Geiser, 2012). These green products are expected to be designed andmanufactured embracing procedures and processes that are energy efficient andless physical resource intensive during their en+re life cycle (Shamdasami et al.,1993; Janssen & Jagey, 2002). These products also have environmentally soundcontentand/orpackaging(ElkingtonandMakower,1988;Wasik,1996).

www.kie.university ( � )26 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

Whether a product is green is a complex issue and is oken the subject of debate(Dangelico and Pujari, 2010; Schiederig et al., 2012). Researchers have differentopinions on features that cons+tute green products. According to Lin and Chang(2012),greenproductscompriseall thoseproductswhicharebiodegradable,non-toxicandhaveeco-friendlypackaging.Whileaccording toChenandChang (2013),greenproducts shouldnothaveadetrimental impactonnaturalenvironmentandalso on human health. Researchers have also suggested that green products, incomparison to conven+onal products, should perform beHer on the ecologicalparameters ((Alabdullah , Laadjal, Ries, & Al-Asadi, 2018; Alabdullah, Nor, & Ries,2018;Alabdullah,2018;Alabdullah,2017;Alabdullah,2016;Alabdullah,Yahya,Nor,& Majeed, 2016; OHman et al., 2006; Schiederig et al., 2012). In fact, the mostimportant difference between the green and the non-green products is that theperformanceofagreenproductimprovescon+nuouslyintermsoftheirgreenness(Schiederiget al., 2012).More specifically, thegreenness inproducts coversmanyquali+essuchaslowwaterusage,reducedpackaging,organically/locallygrown,fairtrade,energyefficiency,biodegradability,easytodissolveordecomposeinsoil,air,andwater,non-toxicandlowvola+leorganiccompoundsandrecyclability(Mangunand Thurston, 2002; Bearse et al., 2009; Dangelico and Pontrandolfo, 2010;MassaweandGeiser,2012).Onthebasisofthesequali+es,Bearseetal.(2009)haveprovided some examples of green products in different categories which can beobservedinTable1.Some successful green products in the market are Toyota Prius, Light EmigngDiodes (LED) and Tide Coldwater as themost successful green products currentlyavailableinthemarket(OHman,2008;Brodrick,2013).AccordingtoOHman(2008),Toyota Prius is the perfect mix of quality and environmental characteris+cs. Inaddi+on to all the desirable quali+es of a sedan, Toyota Prius also has a hybridenginewhich results in fuelefficiencyand, thereby,energyconserva+on.Similarly,Tidecoldwater conserveenergyas itallowsconsumers towashclotheswithcoldwater insteadofhotwater (OHman,2008).AccordingtoBrodrick (2013),LEDsare80percentmoreenergyefficient than tradi+onal ligh+ngs suchasfluorescentandincandescentlights.

www.kie.university ( � )27 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

Table1:ExamplesofGreenProducts

� The incorpora+on of greenness in a product starts right from the first stage ofproductdevelopmentandcon+nues+llthelaunchoftheproductinmarket(Pujariet al., 2003; Orange, 2010). Pujari et al. (2003) delved into the concept ofenvironmental new product development (ENPD) and suggested that theincorpora+on of eco-friendly aHributes in products begins at the idea genera+onstage and con+nue +ll the marke+ng and selling stage. Orange (2010) has alsoechoedPujarietal.(2003)andsuggestedthatthefirmsmustaHempttoincorporategreenaHributesateachstageofanewproductdevelopment.Figure1.showstheeco-friendlyfeaturesateachstageoftheproductdevelopmentanduse.

www.kie.university ( � )28 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

� Figure1:Eco-friendlyFeaturesatDifferentStagesofProductDevelopmentandUseRaw

WithregardtoroleofstakeholdersinENPD,researchershaveindicatedthatthereisarangeofcomplexstakeholder interest involved ineachstageofthenewproductdevelopment (NPD)process (Peage&Ratnayake, 1992;Hart, 1995; Polonsky andRosenberger, 2001). Tiwari et al. (2011) have emphasized that green productdevelopment ismore than just crea+ng an ecologically sound product; it is aboutsystema+c change in society that comprise consumers, producers and the generalcommercialstructurewithinwhichthestakeholdersnego+ate.PolonskyandOHman(1998)haveprovidedrelevantexamplesofhowstakeholderscanbeintegratedintofive stages (opportunity iden+fica+on, design, tes+ng, introduc+on; and lifecyclemanagement)oftheNPDprocess.ThesefivestagescanbeobservedinTable2.2.ItcanbeobservedfromTable2.thatcustomersare involvedduringall thestagesoftheNPDprocess.Theyarethemostimportantstakeholderfromthebusinessfirms’perspec+ve.Thedesigningofappropriatemarke+ngstrategiesandtheirsuccessfulimplementa+on is, thus, very important to mobilize consumers towards greenpurchases. Next sec+on is, therefore, devoted to discussion on the marke+ng ofgreenproducts.

www.kie.university ( � )29 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

Table2.GreeningtheNPDprocess-StakeholderInvolvement

� Churchill and Peter, 2005 (cited in Alsmadi, 2007, p.345-346) described fourmarke+ngmix for environmental products to be important for the posi+oning ofgreen products in consumers‘mind for func+onal or emo+onal factors. Fourelementsforthegreenproductmarke+ngmixare:(1)Greenproducts:Productswhichareenvironment friendlyanddonoharm theuser or environment or have minimal amount of harm for the environment andusers.(2)Greenpricing:Greenpricingmeansgreenproductmaybeofa liHlebithigherpricesinceithasenvironmentfriendlyingredients.Some+mesgreenproductsmaybelessexpensivebecauseofingredientsorproduc+onprocess.(3)Greenmarke+ng channels:Where the company andmembers of the differentchannels are commiHed to follow green strategy for promo+on, distribu+on andhandlingenvironment friendlyorgreenproducts.Channelsarealsoconsideredontherecyclingprocessoftheirproducts.(4) Greenmarke+ng communica+on: In this processmarketers communicatewithconsumerbyadver+sementinprintandelectricmediawithmessageofhowmuchenvironmentfriendlytheirproductsare.Thisdissemina+onofgreenmessagehelpsthecompanytogetconsumersinvolvedwiththeirproductsthatgivesthecompanyachancetogetcompe++veadvantageovernon-greenproducts.

3.ConsumerandA8tudetowardsGreenProductsSince the green marke+ng become the contemporary trend in business, it isimportant to understand how this concept affects the consumer preferences.Ecologically conscious consumers can be defined as individualswho arewilling toconsumetheproductswhichdonotinfluencenega+velytheenvironment(Roberts,1996).AccordingtoHailes(2007),agreenconsumerisapersonwhoassociatesthe

www.kie.university ( � )30 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

actofbuyinggoodswiththepossibilitytoleaveenvironmentuntouched.Theauthorstatethatsuchpersonstryingtoavoidconsumingproductswhichmightberiskytohealth,damagetheenvironment,s+mulateextraconsump+onofenergy,orcontainunsafe ingredients. Increasing theenvironmental awarenessamongconsumers ledtoemergenceofnewconcept-greenpurchaseinten+on.Thisconceptmeansthatcustomers who have higher level of environmental awareness will more likelybehave her/himself environmentally friendly. (Sheltzer et al., 1991).Workingwithgreenpurchaseinten+onsmarketersneedtorememberthatconsumersunlikelywillcompromiseontradi+onalproductcharacteris+csasquality,priceandvalue.GreenproductshavetocombinealltheseaHributesandprovideenoughhighlevelofthem(Chen and Chang, 2012). Not all the consumers are equally favourable to eco-friendly goods. It is possible to differen+ate consumer segments related to greenproductsandthebehaviourinsidethesesegmentsisalsovarying(Lindqvist,2010).One of the well-known segmenta+on of consumers’ environmental agtudes wasdeveloped by the Roper Organiza+on in 1990, according to which there are fivecategoriesofconsumers:• True-BlueGreens–theyarethemostac+veamongothergreenconsumers(11%

ofthepopula+on);• GreenbackGreens– their commitment is reflected inwillingness topayhigher

priceforthegreenproducts(11%);• Sprouts – individualswho support green ini+a+ves, but these ideasnot always

reflectsinpro-environmentalbehaviour(26%);• Grousers – individuals who realise lack of pro-environmental behaviour and

tryingtoimprovethatthroughdifferenttypesofexcusesorthroughcri+cizingoftheothers(24%);

• BasicBrowns–individualswhodonotbelievethatenvironmentalproblemsaresourgent(Coddington,1993).

Therearealotofotherapproachestosegmenta+on,oneofthemostpopularwasdevelopedbyJ.WalterThompson(Coddington,1993):• Greener-thatgreen(23%);• Green(59%);• Lightgreen(15%);• Un-green(3%).

www.kie.university ( � )31 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

A lot of people buying green products, but their behaviour is caused by differentreasonsandaHributes.Greenconsumersmayvaryinsuchtypeofterms:• Demand for eco-friendly products can have different reasons: strong pro-

environmentalbeliefs,desiretotrysomethingnew;• Levelofinterestinenvironmentalissuecanvary;• Frequencyofac+ngasagreenconsumer;• Levelofcommitmentintosearchingofgreenalterna+ves;• Loyaltytogreenandtotradi+onalbrands;• Beliefinthereliabilityandcredibilityoftheeco-friendlyproductorproducer;• Acceptanceofchangesinpricelevelforgreenproducts(Peage,1992).Combina+on of all these factors creates a wide range of different types ofbehaviours among green consumers. Working with ecological agtudes andinten+ons marketers need to remember that they explain the sales of greenproductsjusttoasmallextent.Peoplepurchasegreenjustwhentheyalsowillingtoexpand efforts in obtaining these products: e.g., informa+on, availability or price.Thisreadinessisdifferentfromoneproducttoanother(Hopfenbeck,1993).According to Fazio (1995), agtude is an interac+on in memory between a givenobject and a summary evalua+on of this object. Agtude is likely to reveal thepsychologicalassessmentofaproductbytheconsumer(Bonne,2007;Eagly,1995).In par+cular, previous studies have focused on the rela+onship between agtudesand inten+on. For example, Irland (1993), concluded that consumer’s purchasinginten+onsaredependentupontheirenvironmentalagtudes.AccordingtoTsenetal.(2006),agtudeisamongfactorsthatplaysamajorroleinpredic+nginten+onsofconsumerswhowillpayforgreenproducts.Mostafa(2007),foundthattheposi+verela+onshipbetweenagtudeandinten+onhasbeenestablishedinmanycultures.Agtudehasaclearroleinthedecisiontoacceptaspecificbehaviour.

4.ConclusionGreenproductsandgoodisanessen+alstrategyworldwidetosavetheclimateandsustain the consuming of the natural resources via techniques including recyclingability,energysaving,ecoandnaturalproduc+on.Resultsofthemarke+ngstrategytools is important to point of sales such as minimarkets, supermarkets, andhypermarkets to emphasis of the cri+cal successmarke+ng tools. The results arealsoimportantatthemanufacturerlevelasthestudywillprovidethepercep+onof

www.kie.university ( � )32 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

consumersintoolssuchaslabelling,packaging,andbranding.So,theycanenhancetheir future prac+ces. The findings will be also important for government andlegaliza+onbodiesindevelopingstrategicobjec+vestoenhancethegreenproductsconsump+on.Thispaperwasdesignedtoexplainandunderstandthedifferencesintermsofcategoriesofgreenmarke+ngstrategiesastheyrelatetowhatisobtainablein the purchase green products. The paper started with an understanding of theconcepts available in greenmarke+ng strategies as well as understanding what afirmisallabout.Suchanunderstandinglaidthefounda+onforfurtherresearchonthetopicofdiscussionandtherevela+onisthatgreenmarke+ngstrategiesadop+ngcategoriesthataredesignedtoeliminatethepossibilityofpredic+ngthefuture.

REFERENCESAhma,Α. (2013).GreenPurchasingBehaviour:GreenProductsandAjzen’sTheoryOfPlannedBehaviour,55–60.Ashby,M.F.,2016.Chapter14-thevision:acircularmaterialseconomy.In:Ashby,M.F.(Ed.),MaterialsandSustainableDevelopment.BuHerworth-Heinemann,Boston,pp.211e239.Alabdullah,T.T.Y.,Yahya,S.,Nor,M.,&Majeed,F.(2016).Aninves+ga+onofcorporategovernancefromanew perspec+ve: examining the financial performance of companies and the impact of execu+veturnover.CorporateBoard:Role,Du1es&Composi1on,12(1),53-67.Alabdullah,T.T.Y.(2017).Compensa+oncommiHee,companyboardaHributes,andcompanyperformance:Themodera+ngeffectofleadershipposi+on.In2017WeiInterna1onalAcademicConferenceProceedings,July24-27,2017,BusinessandEconomics(p.127).Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2016). Agency cost and management behavior: The role of performance as amoderator. Agency Cost and Management Behavior: The Role of Performance as a Moderator, 5,1858-1864.Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2018). The Rela+onship Between Ownership Structure and Firm FinancialPerformance:EvidencefromJordan.Benchmarking:AnInterna+onalJournal,25(1),1-17.Alabdullah,T.T.Y.,Nor,M.I.,&Ries,E.(2018).Thedetermina+onoffirmperformanceinemergingna+ons:DoboardsizeandfirmsizemaHer?Management,5(3),57-66.Alabdullah,T.T.Y.,Laadjal,A.,Ries,E.,&Al-Asadi,Y.A.A.(2018).BoardFeaturesandCapitalStructureinEmergingMarkets.JournalofAdvancedManagementScience,6(2).Bearse, S., Capozucca, P., Favret, L., and Lynch, B. (2009). Finding the green in today’s shoppers.Sustainabilitytrendsandnewshopperinsights.GMA/DeloiHeGreenShopperStudyBonne,K.;Vermeir,I.;Bergeaud-Blackler,F.;Verbeke,W.Determinantsofhalalmeatconsump+oninfrance.Br.FoodJ.2007,109,367–386Brodrick,J.(2013).Study:EnvironmentalBenefitsofLEDsGreaterthanCFLs.AvailableathHp://energy.gov/eere/ar+cles/study-environmental-benefits-leds-greater-cfls(retrievdon1stAugust,2013).Chen,Y.S.,andChang,C.H.(2013).Greenwashandgreentrust:Themedia+oneffectsofgreenconsumerconfusionandgreenperceivedrisk.JournalofBusinessEthics,114(3),489-500.Chen,Yu-S.andChangCh.-Hsun,(2012),"Enhancegreenpurchaseinten+ons",ManagementDecision,Vol.50,Iss.3,502–520.Churchill,G.A., & Iacobucci,D.(2005).Marke+ng Reseacrh:Methodological Founda+ons.NinthEdi+on.Manson,Ohio,Thomson/South-western.Coddington W. (1993) “Environmental marke+ng: posi+ve strategies for reaching the green consumer”,McGraw-Hill,USA.Coddington, W. (1993), Environmental Marke+ng: Posi+ve Strategies for Reaching Green Consumers,McGraw-Hill,NewYork,NY.

www.kie.university ( � )33 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

Crane,A.(2000).Facingthebacklash:greenmarke+ngandstrategicreorienta+oninthe1990s.JournalOfStrategicMarke+ng,8(3),277--296.Dangelico,R.M.,&Pontrandolfo,P.2010.Fromgreenproductdefini+onsandclassifica+onstothegreenop+onmatrix.JournalofCleanerProduc+on,18(16),1608-1628Dangelico,R.M.,&Pujari,D. (2010).Mainstreaminggreenproduct innova+on:Whyandhowcompaniesintegrateenvironmentalsustainability.JournalofBusinessEthics,95(3),471-486.Eagly, A.H.; Chaiken, S. Agtude strength, agtude structure, and resistance to change. Agtude StrengthAnteced.Conseq.1995,4,413–432.Elkington,H.andMakower.(1988).TheGreenConsumers.NewYork:PenguinBooks.Fazio, R.H. Agtudes as object-evalua+on associa+ons: Determinants, consequences, and correlates ofagtudeaccessibility.AgtudeStrengthAnteced.Conseq.1995,4,247–282.Glavič, P. & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their defini+ons. Journal of CleanerProduc+on,15,1875-1885.Grimmer, M & Bingham, T (2013). Company environmental performance and consumer purchaseinten+ons.JournalofBusinessResearch,66(1),1945-1953.Gupta,S.andOgden,D.T. (2009),“Tobuyornottobuy?Asocialdilemmaperspec+veongreenbuying”,JournalofConsumerMarke+ng,Vol.26No.6,pp.376-91.Hailes,J.(2007),“TheNewGreenConsumerGuide”,SimonandSchuster,London.Hardin,G.(1993),LivingwithinLimits,EcologyEconomicsandPopula+onTaboos,OxfordUniversityPress,NewYork,NY.Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: some theory and implica+ons. The economic journal, 105 (430),678-689.Hopfenbeck,W.(1993),“Thegreenmanagementrevolu+on:lessonsinenvironmentalexcellence”,Pren+ceHallInc.,USA.Irland, L.C.Wood producers face greenmarke+ng era: Environmentally sound products.Wood Technol.1993,120,34–36.JanssenM.A.and JaggerW. (2002).S+mula+ngdiffusionofgreenproducts-Coevolu+onbetweenfirmsandconsumers.JournalofEvolu+onaryEconomics,12,283-306.Juwaheer,T.D.(2005),“AnemergingenvironmentalmarketinMauri+us:mythorreality”,WorldReviewofEntrepreneurship,ManagementandSust.Development,Vol.1No.1,pp.57-76.Kalafa+s,S.P.,Pollard,M.,East,R.andTsogas,M.H.(1999),“Greenmarke+ngandAjzen’stheoryofplannedbehaviour:across-marketexamina+on”,JournalofConsumerMarke+ng,Vol.16No.5,pp.441-60.Khan,M.N., and Kirmani,M.D. (2015). Influence of environmental characteris+cs of the consumers ontheir willingness to pay for green products: an empirical inves+ga+on. Interna+onal Journal of SocialEntrepreneurshipandInnova+on,3(5),374-386.Kirmani,M.D.(2016).ConsumerAgtudeTowardsGreenProductsinIndia :AnEmpiricalInves+ga+on.Kleiner,A.1991,"Whatdoesitmeantobegreen?''HarvardBusinessReview,Vol.69,pp.38-47.Lin,Y.C.,andChang,C.C.A. (2012).Doublestandard:Theroleofenvironmentalconsciousness ingreenproductusage.JournalofMarke+ng,76(5),125-134.Lindqvist, N. (2010), “Green segmenta+on: A study regarding segmenta+on and green behaviour amongArcadastudents”.DegreeThesis,Arcada.Mainieri,T.andBarneH,E.G.(1997),“Greenbuying:theinfluenceofenvironmentalconcernonconsumerbehaviour”,JournalofSocialPsychology,Vol.137No.2,pp.189-205.Mangun,D.,andThurston,D.L. (2002). Incorpora+ngcomponent reuse, remanufacture,and recycle intoproductpor}oliodesign.EngineeringManagement,IEEETransac+onson,49(4),479-490.Massawe,E.,andGeiser,K. (2012).Thedilemmaofpromo+nggreenproducts:whatweknowanddon'tknowaboutbiobasedmetalworkingfluids.Journalofenvironmentalhealth,74(8),8-16.Mintel(2006),“Greenliving”,USMarke+ngResearchReport,London.Morris,L.,Hastak,M.andMazis,M.(1995), “Consumer comprehension of environmental adver+sing and labeling claims”, The JournalofConsumerAffairs,Vol.29No.2,pp.328-51.Mostafa,M.M.Ahierarchicalanalysisofthegreenconsciousnessoftheegyp+anconsumer.Psychol.Mark.2007,24,445–473.Orange,E.,andCohen,A.M.(2010).Fromeco-friendlytoeco-intelligent.Futurist,44(5),2842.AvailableonlineathHp://www.wfs.org/Upload/SO2010_Orange.pdf(retrievedon10thDecember,2012).

www.kie.university ( � )34 www.kantakji.com

مجلة ا_قتصاد ا'س%مي العا[ية To Index.. 2019 | العدد 80 كانون الثاني / يناير

OHman,J.A.(2008).Thefivesimplerulesofgreenmarke+ng.Designmanagementreview,19(4),65-69.OHman,J.A.,Stafford,E.R.andHartman,C.L.(2006),“Avoidinggreenmarke+ngmyopia:waystoimproveconsumerappealforenvironmentallypreferableproducts”,Environment,Vol.48No.5,pp.22-36.Papadopoulos, I., Karagouni, G., Trigkas, M. and Platogianni, E. (2010), “Green marke+ng: the case ofGreeceincer+fiedandsustainablymanaged+mberproducts”,EuroMedJournalofBusiness,Vol.5No.2,pp.166-90.Peage,K.(1992),“GreenMarke+ng”,PitmanPublishing,London.Peage, K. and Ratnayaka, M. (1992), “Responding to the green movement”, Journal ofIndustrialManagement,Vol.21No.2,pp.103-10.Peage,K., andCrane,A. (2005).Greenmarke+ng: legend,myth, farceorprophesy?.Qualita+veMarketResearch:AnInterna+onalJournal,8(4),357-370.Peage, K., and Ratnayaka, M. (1992). Responding to the green movement. Industrial Marke+ngManagement,21(2),103-110.Polonsky,M.J.,andRosenberger,P.J.(2001).Reevalua+nggreenmarke+ng:Astrategicapproach.BusinessHorizons,44(5),21-30.Polonsky,M.J., andOHman, J. (1998). Stakeholders' contribu+on to thegreennewproductdevelopmentprocess.JournalofMarke+ngManagement,14(6),533-557.Pujari, D., Wright, W. and Peage, K. (2003). Green and compe++ve influences on environmental newproductdevelopmentperformance.JournalofBusinessResearch,56,657-671.Roberts, J.A. (1996), “Green consumers in the1990s: profile and implica+ons for adver+sing”, Journal ofBusinessResearch,Vol.36,Iss.3,217-232.Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., and HerstaH, C. (2012). Green innova+on in technology and innova+onmanagement–anexploratoryliteraturereview.R&DManagement,42(2),180-192.Schiffman, L. G., andWisenblit, J. L. (2014). Consumer behaviour (11th ed.). Pearson. Speer, M. (2011,December9).WhatisaGreenProduct?RetrievedJuly28,2016,fromhHp://www.isustainableearth.com/green-products/what-is-a-green-productSchlossberg,H.1991,``Greenmarke+nghasbeenplanted±nowwatchitgrow'',Marke+ngNews,Vol.4,March,pp.26-30.Shamdasami,P.,Chon-Lin,G.O.,andRichmond,D.(1993).Exploringgreenconsumersinanorientalculture:Roleofpersonalandmarke+ngmixfactors.Advancesinconsumerresearch,20(1),488-493.Sheltzer, L., Stackman, R.W. and Moore, L.F. (1991), “Business – environment agtudes and the newenvironmentalparadigm”,JournalofEnvironmentalEduca+on,Vol.22,Iss.4,14-21.Stafford, E.R. (2003), “Energy efficiency and the new greenmarke+ng”, Environment, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp.8-10.TerraChoice (2007). The six sins of greenwashing- A study of environmental claims in North Americanconsumermarkets.TerraChoiceEnvironmentalMarke+ngInc.TerrachoiceEnvironmentalMarke+ng(2009),TheSevenSinsofGreenwashing,TerrachoiceEnvironmentalMarke+ng,OHawa,ON.Thøgersen,J2007.Themo+va+onalrootsofnormsforenvironmentallyresponsiblebehaviour.ProceedingsoftheNordicConsumerPolicyResearchConference2007,1-16TiwariS.,TripathiD.M.,SrvastavaU.,andYadavP.K(2011).Greenmarke+ng–emergingdimensions,JournalofBusinessExcellence,2(1),18-23.Tsen,C.-H.;Phang,G.;Hasan,H.;Buncha,M.R.Goinggreen:Astudyofconsumers’willingnesstopayforgreenproductsinkotakinabalu.Int.J.Bus.Soc.2006,7,40–54.Wasik,J.(1996),GreenMarke+ngandManagement:AGlobalPerspec+ve,BlackwellPublishersLtd,Oxford.Windrum,P.,Ciarli,T.,andBirchenhall,C.(2009).Environmentalimpact,quality,andprice:consumertrade-offs and the development of environmentally friendly technologies. Technological Forecas+ng and SocialChange,76(4),552-566.

www.kie.university ( � )35 www.kantakji.com