gravitation - university of minnesota

32
Jean-Philippe UZAN 18/05/2017 Minneapolis Gravitation constants, a wall, and some waves

Upload: others

Post on 19-Feb-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Jean-Philippe UZAN

18/05/2017 Minneapolis

Gravitationconstants, a wall, and some waves

Page 2: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Testing General Relativity & EEP

Equivalence principle

Dynamics

•  Universality of free fall •  Local lorentz invariance •  Local position invariance

Relativity

Physical metric

gravitational metric

Page 3: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Tests on the universality of free fall

2016 MicroScope

Page 4: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

MICROSCOPE (CNES) Lundi 25 avril 2016 à 18h02 (heure locale), Soyouz @ Kourou

Bergé, Pernot-Borras, JPU et al, 2017

Page 5: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Scalar-tensor theories

Most general theories of gravity that include a scalar field beside the metric Mathematically consistent Motivated by superstring dilaton in the graviton supermultiplet, modulii after dimensional reduction Consistent field theory to satisfy WEP Useful extension of GR (simple but general enough)

spin 2 spin 0

Page 6: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Deviation from GR

Variation of G

Cou

rtesy

of E

spos

ito-F

arès

e

Constraints valid for a (almost) massless field.

graviton scalar

lnA =1

22

Page 7: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Scalar-tensor theoriesFull dynamics Abundances constraints

Coc Olive, JPU, Vangioni. 2006

Page 8: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

BBN – scalar-tensor and beyond

-  Contraints on scalar-tensor theories from BBN

-  Quantum corrections to the evolution of the scalar mode

-  Extension to a differential coupling between baryonic / DM sector

-  Non universal couplings

Coc Olive, JPU, Vangioni. 2006

Cembrano Olive, JPU, Peloso. 2009

Coc, Olive, JPU, Vangioni. 2009

Coc Nunes, Olive, JPU, Vangioni. 2007

Page 9: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Physical systems

Page 10: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Constancy of fundamental constantsA given physical system gives us an observable quantity

External parameters: temperature,...:

Primary physical parameters

From a physical model of our system we can deduce the sensitivities to the primary physical parameters

The primary physical parameters are usually not fundamental constants.

Step 1:

Step 2:

Page 11: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Local vs cosmological

!20 !10 0 10 20

!5

0

5

∆ΜΜ!$1016"

∆gp

gp

!$1016"

[Luo, Olive, JPU, 2011]

Page 12: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Local vs global[Olive, Peloso, JPU, 2010]

Idea: Spatial discontinuity in the fundamental constant due to a domain wall crossing our Hubble volume.

Page 13: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Spatial distribution of the constants

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5

0.5

1.0

1.5

V ()

↵(+), µ(+), . . .

↵(), µ(), . . .

Page 14: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

< RH

>> RH

Constants vary on sub-Hubble scales. - may be detected - microphysics in principle acessible

Constants vary on super-Hubble scales. - landscape ? - exact model of a theory which dynamically gives a distribution of fondamental constants - no variation on the size of the observable universe

[JPU, 2011]

Page 15: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Nuclear physics in astrophysical context

-  Big bang nucleosynthesis-  Stellar nucleosynthesis

Page 16: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

BBN

0.22

0.24

0.26

WM

AP

ΩBh2

Mas

s fra

ctio

n

4He

10 -2

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

3 He/

H, D

/H

D

3He

10-10

10-9

1 107 Li

/H

7Li

Plan

ck

η×1010

BD = 0.22 MeV

Page 17: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

1.  Equillibrium between 4He and the short lived (~10-16 s) 8Be : αα↔8Be

2.  Resonant capture to the (l=0, Jπ=0+) Hoyle state: 8Be+α→12C*(→12C+γ)

Simple formula used in previous studies

1.  Saha equation (thermal equilibrium)

2.  Sharp resonance analytic expression:

NA2 〈σv〉ααα = 33/ 26NA

2 2πMαkBT'

( )

*

+ ,

3

5γ exp −Qααα

kBT'

( )

*

+ ,

with Qααα= ER(8Be) + ER(12C) and γ≈Γγ

Nucleus 8Be 12C

ER (keV) 91.84±0.04 287.6±0.2

Γα (eV) 5.57±0.25 8.3±1.0

Γγ (meV) - 3.7±0.5

ER = resonance energy of 8Be g.s. or 12C Hoyle level (w.r.t. 2α or 8Be+α)

Triple α coincidence (Hoyle)

[Ekström, Coc, Descouvemont, Meynet, Olive, JPU, Vangioni,2009]

Stellar evolution – 3α

Page 18: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

BBN

Independent variations of the BBN parameters

Abundances are very sensitive to BD.

Equilibrium abundance of D and the reaction rate p(n,γ)D depend exponentially on BD.

These parameters are not independent.

Difficulty: QCD and its role in low energy nuclear reactions.

Coc,Nunes,Olive,JPU,Vangioni 2007

Page 19: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Constraints

Coc, Descouvemont,Olive, JPU,Vangioni 2012

Page 20: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Stellar evolution – 3α

Page 21: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Stellar evolution – 3αStellar evolution of massive Pop. III stars We choose typical masses of 15 and 60 M¤ stars/ Z=0 ⇒Very specific stellar evolution

60 M¤ Z = 0 Ø The standard region: Both 12C and 16O are produced.

Ø  The 16O region: The 3α is slower than 12C(α,γ)16O resulting in a higher TC and a conversion of most 12C into 16O

Ø  The 24Mg region: With an even weaker 3α, a higher TC is achieved and 12C(α,γ)16O(α,γ)20Ne(α,γ)24Mg transforms 12C into 24Mg

Ø  The 12C region: The 3α is faster than 12C(α,γ)16O and 12C is not transformed into 16O

Constraint 12C/16O ~1 -0.0005 < δNN < 0.001 or -0.003 < ΔBD/BD < 0.009

12C

[Ekström, Coc, Descouvemont, Meynet, Olive, JPU, Vangioni,2009]

Page 22: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

From pop. III to BH & GWPop. III stars ends in either NS or BH - evolution depends on (M,Z) - Study of the BH merger rate (and GW background) & metallicity. - dependence in

- initial mass function - star formation rates - BH mass prediction

- predict also Z(t), reionisation

[see Talk by Elisabeth Vangioni]

[Dvorkin, Vangioni, Silk, JPU, Olive, 2016]

Frequency [Hz]10 1 10 2

ΩG

W

10 -10

10 -9

10 -8

10 -7

LIGO FiducialLIGO Fiducial + uncertaintyFryer FiducialFryer Fiducial + uncertaintyFryer, fixed mass

Page 23: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Astrophysical GW background

Improvements: - take into account the GW background arising from the inspiral phase (unresolved) - describe the evolution of binary systems (NS & BH) as a system of interacting fluids

Frequency [Hz]10 -6 10 -4 10 -2 10 0 10 2

ΩG

W

10 -18

10 -16

10 -14

10 -12

10 -10

10 -8This work, a min =0.2 AUThis work, a min =0.15-0.3 AUMergers only (D16)LIGO O5Cosmic ExplorereLISADECIGO

[Dvorkin, JPU, Vangioni, Silk, 2016]

Page 24: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Astrophysical GW background

Astrophysical observations include the detection of the radiation from - resolved sources - unresolved sources

While the mean energy density of GW has been well studied, its anisotropies have not.

- far away from observation - prospective

Page 25: Gravitation - University of Minnesota
Page 26: Gravitation - University of Minnesota
Page 27: Gravitation - University of Minnesota
Page 28: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Anisotropies of the AGWB

Page 29: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Anisotropies of the AGWB

Page 30: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Anisotropies of the AGWB: covariant result

[Cusin, Pitrou, JPU, 2017]

Page 31: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Anisotropies of the AGWB: perturbed FL

[Cusin, Pitrou, JPU, 2017]

Page 32: Gravitation - University of Minnesota

Challenges and open questions

Theoretical: - cosmic structure, specetime geometry, velocity fields - GW production processes

Dependency in:

- Galaxy evolution & distribution - binary formation rate & evolution - properties of binary (PDF of eccentricity, semi-major axes,…)

Observational:

- not yet clear how it can be observed - either provide information on local physics (mergers etc.) or new cosmological probe