grassroots advocacy and collaboration makes possible living in a networked neighborhood for people...

12
GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita Nika Flagler,Ph.D., MSW Associate Professor at Shippensburg University, Pennsylvania, USA

Upload: octavia-shields

Post on 27-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIESM a r i t a N i k a F l a g l e r, P h . D . , M S W

A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r a t

S h i p p e n s b u r g U n i v e r s i t y , P e n n s y l v a n i a , U S A

Page 2: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

BACKGROUND: THE RESIDENTIAL TASK FORCE

Started by frustrated parents who pressured collaboration of agencies.• Response to agency apathy in addressing needs of people with intellectual disabilities (IDD)

Page 3: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE

Partnership• Parents/family members• Met needs• Unmet needs

• People with ID• County ID services management and staff• Provider management and staff• Advocacy organizations• Representatives from school district• Community members

• Non- hierarchical structure of power: • Meetings are facilitated by a community member• Leadership shared by a community member and a parent

Page 4: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

ACHIEVEMENTS

• The Networked Neighborhood Plan• Secured more than 6 million dollar in

funding for home and community services and residential services

• Three new day programs with a community participation approach

• People were moved to less restrictive residential settings (apartment plus)

• 12 new group homes were opened, another one on the way.

Page 5: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

RESEARCH QUESTIONS:

1. What are the ingredients of a successful grassroots advocacy organization?

2. What is the impact of a successful grassroots advocacy movement on its membership?

Page 6: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

STUDY METHODS

Design: Case study, participant observer, qualitative

Participants: all members of the Residential Task Force (people with disabilities, parents and family members, community members, staff from three disability service agencies, staff from County IDD services)

Data collection process: careful note taking, video-taped interviews with RTF leaders and members

Data collection time frame: September 2006- June 2012

Data processing: Ground theory, identification of themes and subthemes.

Page 7: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

FINDINGS: HOW DID IT HAPPEN? PROCESS

“Learning to Listen and Listening to Learn “

Page 8: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

HOW DID IT HAPPEN? PROCESS

• Development of a new narrative. • Action-oriented (policy advocacy)• Empowerment of members• Shift in philosophy: search for meaningful

inclusion and real self-determination of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities

• Success comes from collaboration

Page 9: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

PROCESS: REDEFINING ADVOCACY SPACERTF has become:• A physical space (bringing all stakeholders together)• Example: Meeting with leader of the PA Department

of Welfare. • A social space (creating opportunities for networking)• A cultural space (where new values , rights and

cultures are created)• An innovative place (new programs are developed:

Cumberland Perry Respite Care Program• A learning space• From each-other• With each other• For Shippensburg University students

Page 10: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

IMPACT ON THE CULTURE OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES

More open to feedbackMore accountableValue collaboration with stakeholdersAppreciate parent involvementExample: UCP request for new training

Page 11: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Successful grassroots community advocacy organizations require:

• Time and work to develop cohesion• Redefining advocacy space and using

it intelligently to build capacity and sustainability

• Spill-over effect to impact the surrounding service community

Page 12: GRASSROOTS ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION MAKES POSSIBLE LIVING IN A NETWORKED NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Marita