graphical analysis of scientific collaboration variations interactions

14
1/14 Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations 1 Veslava Osinska [email protected] Grzegorz Osinski [email protected]

Upload: knowescape2014

Post on 07-Aug-2015

56 views

Category:

Science


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

1/14

Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations

1

Veslava Osinska [email protected]

Grzegorz Osinski [email protected], CSMC Toruń (Poland)

Page 2: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Brain Spirography (BS) – investigated activity of “natural neurons” on breath center in human brain.

Breath centerin human brain stem

Neural nets

Total activity of neurons network as Time Series

Return Map Plotof activity

40 50 60 70 80 900,2

0,4

Czas [s]

FD =2.32

2

Page 3: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Clinical application for BS measurements

Patient BS Measurable System

Data Streaming Divider

Nonlinear Analyzing

System NAS

Computer Visualization and Storage

System

Hardware Part Software Part Implementation

Zone

RR

HRV

BR

ECG

others

FD = 1.78

Total activity of NN

3

Page 4: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Transfer from clinical aplication for scientific collaboration

0

5

10

15

20

25

40 50 60 70 80 900,2

0,4

Czas [s]

How to calculate ?

Neurons Scientists

/14 4

Page 5: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

1. Mycielski construction – for pairs or small groups of scientists

2. The longest path length

3. Different groups of collaborators

4. Reconstruction of time series based on scientist activity

5. Construction of Return Map Plot and calculation of Fractal Dimention

Procedure

Mycielski graph G it is μ(G) constructed by procedure of Jan Mycielski (1955) based on theorem that bigest clique has a dimenstion ≤ 2 and maximum chromatic number.

MG will select a pairs of different colors (specialization) scientist

5

Page 6: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Selected groups of collaboration Leaders Connectors Performers („doits”) Outliers

5 10 15 20

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

4 group

3 group

2 group

0,000

3,750

7,500

11,25

15,00

18,75

22,50

26,25

30,00

1 group

6

Page 7: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Data

Members Activity• Source: Knowescape.org: participants, their groups, Steering

Commitee• Mobility & Coorganization

Members' Publications• ResearchGate• Mendeley• Knowescape• Personal websites

7

Page 8: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Co-organization (via Andrea)

8

Page 9: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Agregational activity

9

Page 10: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Leader - performer

FD = 1.24

10

Page 11: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Performer - performerFD = 1.39

11

Page 12: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

FD = 1.46

12

Connector - performer

Page 13: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Discussion• Stable/unstable collaboration’s state - analogy to breathing • 2 NEW parameters for graphical analysis of scientists’

collabaration

1. Shape of Poincare section (RMP) The level of nonlinearity – the S.C. factor of collaboration is proportional

for quantity curves of higher degree than one (linear)

2. Value of FD for pairs The value of FD is proportional for the ability (dynamics?) to cooperate.

13

Page 14: Graphical Analysis of Scientific Collaboration Variations Interactions

Thank you for attentionThank you for attention

1.Osinska V, Osinski G, Kwiatkowska A. Visualization in Learning: Perception, Aesthetics and Pragmatism. In: Maximizing Cognitive Learning through Knowledge Visualization, IGI Global 2015 (in press)

2.R. Mazur, G. Osiński, A. Ogonowski, G.Mikolaiczik, Analysis of Brain Stem Respiratory Center Function by Use of Mathematical Apparatus of Chaos Theory 1st CENTRAL EUROPEAN BIOMEDICAL CONGRESS, p. 53-54, 2014

3.R. Mazur, G. Osiński, M. Świerkocka, G, Evaluation of the dynamics of energetic changes in the brain stem respiratory centre in the course of increasing disorders of consciousness, Act. Nerv. Super. Rediviva, V 51, 2009.

4.M Świerkocka-Miastkowska, G Osiński , Nonlinear analysis of dynamic changes in brain spirography. Results in patients with ischemic stroke, Clinical Neurophysiology, 2007

5.Tamassia, R. "Graph Drawing." Ch. 21 in Handbook of Computational Geometry (Ed. J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland, pp. 937-971, 2000

contact: [email protected]

14

References