graphic no. 1. - united states courts · 2017-08-21 · case 2:05-cv-04182-srd-jcw document 19415-2...

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No. 1.

• 0 4 6 12Miles

MR·GQ Mila Markers

Spoil DepOlllion AI"

_ estual~1& hallltat

_ marsh hQbllQI

~.

.6.§g~

·N

~'... .:...

,,,

r··..'

I':

'1 ': ., .....

. r :

:1

. J

",';'l"

---t>-'

..

,,

..:,.

, .

,

...~.

·l

, f

.".' .

.'.

.',

II L ,. II !t

, . ,--

.7'-'

. # ">-".-._-

...."'l,~ 'iP'J' ---I::~..... ~·S, . -,,"-,if"' -;:':[;: :... '~r:I'

";]'.~.\..::' . ......~...... ~ "r

I~-' -'.. ""... "\ .....

MR·GO SUlWY Sllilious8Design CIlDIIl\81 Top

_ estuarlno Illlbllal

marsh tlobil.Ol

Environmental Science Services. Inc.P,O. Box 1289Denham Sprin9s, Louisiana 70727·12892251927·7171

Legend

,.,XF$-OOl.QOOQOOO12


~

A

I!

Reach 1 Reach 2

Inner Harbor Paris Road Bayou Bienvenu" Navigation Canal I I.~ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _~,., -;~: "'lp l"~r _~

_·...~,.l~~u.·.__ ..~'\.t..:-: - - • -~ ..~_. :_.•_~.~.;;

~r'-~ ~.r t~', .' "~" :;7 ..l' ~ .....

..,·lCll

."..

_ Natural levee

;:':!ii;l~ Intradelta, delta front, and distributary mouth bar

~

i~x

"It.:,

,.·Ii'\!' 1mile

Swamp

Marsh

, ,-,,~ Bay/sound

Interdistributary

_ Abandoned distributary

Point bar

~ Fill/spoil/levee

_Prodelta

. ., Nearshore gulf

r~ilI Substratum sand and gravel

-- Top of Pleistocene

- - • Approximate depth of MRGO

(,.1

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33

Graphic No 3A.

~~

,-----, ,-----, ,-----,

"

I~~

Reach 2

Bayou Dupre

I

~ffp.r7. . . !f!lIII!I!I. ". .-.. , .:,' ., .....--z~.~

~

6-4

_ Natural levee

;:.):(1;.'!;; Intradelta, delta front. and distributary mouth bari~~

."..I

I..I.:

,~

'"I

'"r 1mile.,.

Swamp

Marsh

,''''; Bay/sound

Interdistributary

_ Abandoned distributary

Point bar

~Fill/spoil/levee

_Prodelta

Nearshore gulf

Substratum sand and gravel

,.... Top of Pleistocene

__ • Approximate depth of MRGO

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 3B.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No. 4A.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No. 4B.

2008

I~

2 (I COIt<lIllC!lOll Olrctl hnp.1tl~

•

1959

2008

ritul't' 2.10 A"proxim.", I\'!R.GQ SIMlior. ~')U kook/tiS o;mnhC:l~1 f)\'cr t11~Otl MCn:lcr

consilkr:lbl\ in lhis:lrt':l Red dot 1l1.1,h smile loc:ll;on on both 1"~Ip.cs

••

~'jl:lIl't' 2.'J Amss c~,\,l (19$9). p0!01«MIUlllctloll ch:'lIlnel (~1It' "Il'~) :md currenl ch:ulllci (IOnll) MI MRGO Slmion .rtr.lot*illp. MlllrllCOl"l~ 0.'\'0" 13kn'"cnnc Red dol shows S.'lnc 1CJC:llion on :,11 p1lOlas

...<;

889

~x

Impilct orlt.e Mi~js~ippl R;\"(:rGlilrOn,lcl (MR-GO)' Gcol01:~ ;Iud Gcomol11holoil}'

JlIl~ 2H1I1I ,., Envlronmenlnl SClonce SelVk';e,. Inc


Graphic No. 5.

[11t

;:-.I

II'" 0

I0NSC..";;~0;;;c..(§Ee

~~

]..cC~."~"iicc~~u0

IIi'0

:

.I

II

:E

I-U,

~~

~~

~~

SOlI''''''"

"'''0

1-.0

-4'...."'lhi."P

!M

~

..•I!w


Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No. 7C.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No. 7D.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 7E.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 7F.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 8.

69

113. Fitzgerald et al continue (Figure 10):

“Conceptual model for lateral displacement of the interdistributary deposits into the MR-

GO channel excavation due to overburden loading and the high-angle of channel walls

as built by the USACE. This phenomenon was predicted prior to construction by USACE

(1958) and resulted in the need for continual channel maintenance dredging as noted in

USACE (1976). The migration of sediments into the channel from the underlying

interdistributary deposits results in subsidence of the land surface and increases rates of

landloss along the channel. Waves produced by wind and the passage of large

oceangoing vessels accelerate the rate of bank failure and landloss within the marsh

deposits.”

Figure 10: Model for lateral displacement of interdistributary deposits into the MR-GO channel excavation due to overburden loading (after Fitzgerald et al 2008).


Bayou Bienvenue

423'

306'

298'

285'

447'

434'

367'

283'

393'

388'

387'

381'

266'

364'

346'

262'

339'

335'

332'

226'

322'

959'

536'

480'

747'

2673'

233'26

6'

314'

552'

638'

847'

878'

977'

1088'

1098'

1143'

1229'

1279'

1481'

1870'

Mile56

Mile57

Mile58

Mile59

Mile 60

9.5'

6.4'

8'

4.5'

8'6.3

'6.5

'

5'

7'

11.5'

8'

11'

10.5'

13'

13'9'

5.2'

11.5'

9.3'

12'

11.5'

11'

8'

13'

16.5'

16'

18'

16'

18.5'

18'

17.5'

15.5'

16'

18'

16.5'

17'

16.5'

15.7'

16.5'

16.2'

15'

LegendDesign Top of Channel2005 ShorelineChad Morris Levee Breaches w/ Sill ElevationsSteven Fitzgerald Pre-Katrina Levee Heights

Duncan FitzGerald Channel WideningEast BankWest Bank

15.0'10.0'


Bayou Dupre

427'

326'

434'

538'

498'

447'

128'

319'

370'

359'

302'

280'

339'

338'

333'

328'

169'

138'

133'

582' 257

'

241'

182'

573'

152'

568'

381'

342'

670'

98'

339'

611'

647'

653'

1770'

738'

959'

1029'

1060'

1225'

Mile53

Mile54

Mile55

Mile56

12.5'

12'

8.2'

10.8'

10'

9.5'

12.5'

10.5'

12'

8'

9'

8'

8'

10'

9.5'

10.5'

7'

10'

11'

10.5'

10.5'

14.5'

14'

8'

10.5'

17.3'

12'

17'

15.5'15.

5'15.5'

15.7'

16'16'

16'

17'16.5'

16.9'

18.5'

17'

15.8'15.

5'

15.7'

15.7'



15.0'10.0'


Bayou Dupre

288'

148'

270'

270'

266'

141'

264'

244'

229'

218'

216'

206'

294'

198'

195'

191'

155'

284'

274'

1943

'

238'

111'

305'

337'

339'

363'

465'

495'

500'

544'

702'

931'

958'

1118'

Mile

50

Mile51

Mile52

Mile

49

13.5'

13.2'

13'

13.5'

14'

13'

14.8'

12.5'

13.2'

11.5'

13.7'

13.5'

12.5'

10.5'

14.2'

9.8'12.5'

12'10'

13.8'

7.5'

11'

11.5'

11'

12'

13'

13'

19'

17'

18'

17.5'

18.5'

17.9'

17.5'

18.5'

17.5'

18.5'

18'16'



15.0'10.0'

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 10C.

559'

533'

531'

487'

432'

407'

399'

377'

198'

359'

289'

285'

264'

225'

210'

177'

790'

737'

688'

609'

607'

227'

619'

688'

853'

931'

950'110

0'

1125'

1148'12

36'

337'

1427

'

1259

'

1265

'

1564

'

1702

'

1742

'

178'

1021

'

223'

223'

Mile

48

Mile

47

Mile

49

Mile

46

14'

13.5'

15'

13'

14.5'

13.2'13

.7'

15.5'

14.8'

13.5'

18.2'

18.5'

17'

18.23'

18.65'

18.74'

14'

18.48'



15.0'10.0'

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 10D.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No 10.5A.

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic 10.5B.

Date : 27 January 2009 Subject : Comparison flood depth development between Katrina event and Scenario 2C From : ir. B. Maaskant, dr.ir. M. Kok To : Joe Bruno Comparison flood depth development between Katrina event and Scenario 2C The flooding of the bowls in New Orleans has been simulated with the use of the 1D2D flood simulation program SOBEK, see Kok et al. (2007). In that report three bowls have been distinguished, the Orleans Metro bowl, the New Orleans East bowl and the Saint Bernard bowl. For the three bowls flood simulations are constructed. Following on that report this memorandum will present the flood depth development over time for five specific locations. These locations are all situated in the Saint Bernard bowl (figure 1). In the table and picture below the five locations are shown. Table 1: The five considered locations

X Y ELEV LATITUDE LONGITUDE LABEL ADDRESS1 3701833.15 558522.32 -7,06 -2,15 30° 01' 44.79" N 90° 00' 10.35" W Norman Robinson 6965 Mayo Blvd2 3711112.77 526786.89 5,02 1,53 29° 56' 29.58" N 89° 58' 29.07" W Kent Lattimore 2100 Marcelle Dr3 3710323.83 526941.93 4,32 1,32 29° 56' 31.20" N 89° 58' 38.02" W Lattimore & Associates 9117 W Saint Bernard Hwy4 3723163.88 530081.29 0,72 0,22 29° 57' 00.75" N 89° 56' 11.64" W Tanya Smith 3920 Despaux Dr5 3698969.91 533470.55 1,53 0,47 29° 57' 37.14" N 90° 00' 46.21" W Lucille and Anthony Franz 5926 Saint Claude Ave

Figure 1: Visual representation of the five locations

Because the locations ‘Lattimore & Associates’ and ‘Kent Lattimore’ are close together and the 50 by 50 meter grid that is used in the simulations these two locations will be considered as one.


Flood simulations Greater New Orleans July 2007

39

In our model simulations no overtopping occurs before 7:00am, and the two breaches start at 7:00am. Therefore no water, except rain water, prior to 7:00am is visible inside the Lower 9th Ward in the simulation results. ILIT gives an alternative explanation for the early water mentioned by eye witness reports in IPET. ILIT mentions under seepage, water migrating from the channel, under pressure, beneath the IHNC floodwalls as a possible explanation for the early flood water in the Lower 9th Ward. Under seepage through a levee is not captured in the simulation.

2005-08-29 05:00h

2005-08-29 05:30h

2005-08-29 06:00h

2005-08-29 06:30h



40

2005-08-29 07:00h

2005-08-29 07:30h

2005-08-29 08:00h

2005-08-29 10:00h

2005-08-29 09:00h

2005-08-29 08:30h



41

Figure 5.2 Progressing snapshots of the computed internal flooding water depth inside the St. Bernard bowl Figure 5.2 shows the calculated maximum internal flooding depths in the St. Bernard bowl as a consequence of the breaches and overtopping initiated by hurricane Katrina. Figure 5.4 shows the comparison between our computed internal flood hydrographs and those presented by IPET for the St. Bernard bowl. The locations of the hydrographs are indicated in figure 5.1, location A corresponds with Lower 9th Ward NW., B with Lower 9th Ward E. and C with Chalmette. IPET based its hydrographs on eye witness accounts, stopped clock times and time/date stamped digital photographs. Our computed flood hydrographs are very similar to the data presented by IPET. The predicted peak flood level is within a foot of IPET’s measurements. The peak in the model is a couple of hours earlier and the water level starts to decrease earlier than in the IPET hydrographs. The final water descent rate in the model is about equal to the IPET hydrograph. As discussed previously, in extreme events such as Katrina is difficult if not impossible to get direct measurement of some input data such as water levels at the time of a breach, especially right at the breach location. However, the differences between the computer model results and the calibration data are fully acceptable. For the purpose of this study the model results are very credible.

2005-08-29 12:00h

2005-08-29 11:00h

Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 19415-2 Filed 11/18/2009 of 33Graphic No. 12C.

6666

666

6666

666

Bayou Bienvenue262

'

388'

387'

381'

285'

367'

335'

364'

346'

342'

447'

434'

339'

423'

393'

332'

322'

306'

266'

298'

226'

283'

480'

2673'

552'

977'

330'

878'

314'

847'

747'

638'

266'

959'

233'

536'

1088'

1098'

1143'

1229'

1279'

1481'

1870'

Mile59

Mile 60

Mile56

Mile57

Mile58

11'

9.5'

6.4'

8'

4.5'

8'6.3

'6.5

'

5'

7'

11'

11.5'

8'

13'

9.5'

13'

9'

5.2'

11.5'

9.3'

11.5'

13'

8'

12'

18'

17'

17'

17.5'

16'

18'

18.5'

16.5'

16.5'

16.5'

18'

16.5'

16'

15'

16.2'

369'

276'

378'

288'

391'

395'

400'

427'

437'

461'

497'

333'

554'

327'

446'

342'

505'

352'

355'

332'

633'

2,000 0 2,000Feet

8

*Levee toe delineated 50-feet from centerline of levee.

LegendDesign Top of Channel2005 Shoreline

66666 Levee Sheetpile/Wall StructuresChad Morris Levee Breaches w/ Sill ElevationsSteven Fitzgerald Pre-Katrina Levee HeightsDistance from Levee Toe* to 2005 Shoreline


10.0'15.0'

39


GIS Data from: PX1818, PX1819, PX1820, PX1823, PX1825, PX1849, PX1851, PX1863; and S. Fitzgerald levee crest elevation from PX2138.3

Graphic No. 15A.

6666

666

6666

666

666

6666

666

666

6

66

66

Bayou Dupre 270'

280'

582'

538'

498'

434'

427'

133'

370'

359'

447'

169'

138'

339'

338'

333'

328'

326'

319'

302'

128'

573'

568'

381'

342'

339'

1770'

257'

182'

241'

653'

98'

152'

611'

647'

1225'

670'

738'

959'

1029'

1060'

Mile53

Mile54

Mile55

Mile56

12'

12.5'

12'

8.2'

10.8'

10'

9.5'

12.5'

10.5'

12'

8'

9.5'

9'

2'

8'

8'

10'

9.5'

10.5'

7'

10'

11'

10.5'

10.5'

14.5'

14'

8'

10.5'

17.3'

15.7'

15.8'15.

5'

15.7'

17'

15.5'

15.5'

15.7'

17'

16'

18.5'

17'

16'

16'

352'

302'

367'

371'

374'

387'

387'

393'

177'

215'

412'

570'

439'

581'

383'

269'

134'

581'

289'

546'

345'

2,000 0 2,000Feet

8





10.0'15.0'

40



Graphic No. 15B.

666

Bayou Dupre

294'

195'

191'

155'

270'

288'

148'

270'

266'

264'

141'

229'

218'

216'

206'

244'

198'

363'

339'

337'

305'

284'

274'

98'

238'

1943'

111'

465'495

'

500'

544'

702'

931'

958'

1118'

Mile

50

Mile51

Mile52

Mile

49

13'

13.5'

13'

13.5'

14'

13'

14.8'

12.5'

11.5'

13.7'

13.5'

12.5'

10.5'9.8

'

13.2'

12.5'

12'10'

13'

7.5'

11'

11.5'

11'

12'

13.8'

18'16'

17.5'

17'

17.5'

18.5'

17.5'

17.5'

19'

18'

18.5'

17.5'

18.5'

503'

519'

420'

524'

429'

546'

567'569

'

570'

439'

581'

443'

447'

456'

572'

469'

488'

501'

503'

522'

2,000 0 2,000Feet

8





10.0'15.0'

41



Graphic No. 15C.

66666666

790'

737'

688'

609'

607'

559'

533'

531'

487'

432'

407'

399'

359'

289'

377'285

'

177'

225'

198'

210'

264'

1702'

178'

223'

223'

1742'

337'

950'

619'

688'

853'

931'

227'

1021'

1100'

1125'

1148'

1236'

1427'

1259'

1265'

1564'

Mile

47

Mile

48

Mile

49

Mile

46

13.5'

13.2'

15.5'

14'13

.5'

15'

13'

13.7'

18.23'

18.65'

18.48'

18.74'

18'

17.4'

18.2'

18.5'

17'

17'

325'

456'

295'

349'

510'

366'

522'

498'

524'

321'

438'

443'

543'

2,000 0 2,000Feet

8





10.0'15.0'

42



Graphic No. 15D.

graphic no. 1. - united states courts · 2017-08-21 · case 2:05-cv-04182-srd-jcw document 19415-2...

Documents