grange im v10-cdb(b)

110
Information Memorandum February 2010

Upload: ambreen-afzal

Post on 21-Apr-2015

695 views

Category:

Documents


9 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

Information Memorandum

February 2010

Page 2: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

ii

Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 11

1.1 Transaction Overview ................................................................................................................. 11

1.2 Investment Environment in Pakistan .......................................................................................... 12

1.3 Pakistan Energy Sector Overview ............................................................................................... 13

1.3.1 Power Sector............................................................................................................................... 13

1.3.2 Regulatory and Institutional Framework ................................................................................... 14

1.4 The Project .................................................................................................................................. 15

1.5 The Financials .............................................................................................................................. 16

2. TRANSACTION OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 18

2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 18

2.2 Project Status .............................................................................................................................. 18

2.3 Current Status ............................................................................................................................. 19

2.4 Way Forward ............................................................................................................................... 19

2.5 Capital Structure ......................................................................................................................... 20

2.6 Communication with the Company ............................................................................................ 21

3. INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT IN PAKISTAN ....................................................................................... 22

3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 22

3.2 Political Situation ........................................................................................................................ 22

3.3 Legal System................................................................................................................................ 23

3.4 The Economy ............................................................................................................................... 23

3.4.1 Key Highlights of FY2009 ............................................................................................................ 24

3.4.2 Exchange Rate ............................................................................................................................ 25

3.4.3 Credit Rating .............................................................................................................................. 25

3.5 Capital Markets ........................................................................................................................... 25

3.6 Policy Incentives for Foreign Investors ....................................................................................... 27

3.6.1 Investment Incentive Package ................................................................................................... 28

3.6.2 Exchange Control ....................................................................................................................... 29

3.7 Tax Regimes ................................................................................................................................ 29

3.7.1 Tax Rates .................................................................................................................................... 29

3.7.2 Withholding Tax ......................................................................................................................... 30

Page 3: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

iii

3.7.3 Inter-Corporate Dividend Tax .................................................................................................... 30

3.7.4 Unilateral Relief.......................................................................................................................... 30

3.7.5 Tax Treaties ................................................................................................................................ 31

3.7.6 Capital Gains Tax ........................................................................................................................ 31

4. PAKISTAN ENERGY SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 32

4.1 Energy Sector Overview .............................................................................................................. 32

4.1.1 Oil ............................................................................................................................................... 32

4.1.2 Gas.............................................................................................................................................. 35

4.1.3 Coal ............................................................................................................................................ 36

4.2 Power Sector ............................................................................................................................... 37

4.2.1 Installed Generation Capacity .................................................................................................... 37

4.2.2 Structure of Power Sector .......................................................................................................... 38

4.2.3 National Transmission and Despatch Company ........................................................................ 39

4.3 Independent Power Producers ................................................................................................... 41

4.3.1 IPP Fast Track Initiative: ............................................................................................................. 43

4.4 RPPs ............................................................................................................................................. 43

4.5 Power Sector Demand vs Supply Dynamics ................................................................................ 44

4.5.1 Demand Patterns ....................................................................................................................... 46

4.5.2 Sector Demand ........................................................................................................................... 46

4.5.3 Regional Demand ....................................................................................................................... 46

5 POWER SECTOR REGULATION ................................................................................................................ 47

5.1 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................................ 47

5.2 Provincial Representation at NEPRA ........................................................................................... 47

5.3 Institutional Framework.............................................................................................................. 47

5.4 NEPRA’s Role and Responsibilities .............................................................................................. 48

5.5 Licenses ...................................................................................................................................... 49

5.6 Tariffs .......................................................................................................................................... 49

5.7 Transition to Competition ........................................................................................................... 50

6. THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................................ 51

6.1 Grange Power Limited ................................................................................................................ 51

6.2 Objective of the Company .......................................................................................................... 51

Page 4: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

iv

6.3 The Project .................................................................................................................................. 52

6.4 Plant Site ..................................................................................................................................... 52

6.5 Plant Capacity ............................................................................................................................. 53

6.6 Engineering Procurement & Construction Agreement ............................................................... 54

6.6.1 Layout Plant and Buildings ......................................................................................................... 54

6.6.2 Machinery and Suppliers ............................................................................................................ 55

6.6.3 EPC Timeline............................................................................................................................... 57

6.6.4 EPC Costs .................................................................................................................................... 57

6.7 Tariff Determination ................................................................................................................... 59

6.8 Tariff Structure ............................................................................................................................ 60

6.8.1 Capacity Purchase Price ............................................................................................................. 60

6.8.2 Energy Purchase Price ................................................................................................................ 60

6.8.3 Tariff Adjustments to CPP Components .................................................................................... 60

6.8.4 Adjustments to EPP Components .............................................................................................. 61

6.9 Taxes ........................................................................................................................................... 61

6.10 Summary of Key Agreements and Contracts .............................................................................. 62

6.10.1 Power Purchase Agreement ................................................................................................... 62

6.10.2 Implementation Agreement .................................................................................................... 63

6.10.3 Fuel Supply Agreement ........................................................................................................... 65

6.10.4 Engineering & Procurement Contract and Construction Contract ......................................... 66

6.10.5 Project and Construction Management Contract ................................................................... 67

6.10.6 Operation and Maintenance Contract .................................................................................... 68

6.10.7 Local Loan Agreement ............................................................................................................. 68

7. PROJECT SPONSORS AND CONTRACTORS .......................................................................................... 70

7.1 Ownership and Control ............................................................................................................... 70

7.1.1 Shareholder Control ................................................................................................................... 70

7.1.2 Board of Directors....................................................................................................................... 70

7.2 Shareholder Profiles .................................................................................................................... 71

7.2.1 Mr. Assad Sheikh ........................................................................................................................ 71

7.2.2 Mr. Shuja Hussain ....................................................................................................................... 72

7.2.3 Mr. Amjad Faquir ........................................................................................................................ 72

Page 5: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

v

7.2.4 Grange Holdings Group .............................................................................................................. 74

7.2.5 Albario Engineering Pvt. Ltd ....................................................................................................... 78

7.2.6 China National Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corporation .................................... 80

7.3 Contractor and Consultant Profiles............................................................................................. 82

7.3.1 Korea Plant Service and Engineering Co Ltd ............................................................................... 82

7.3.2 Scott Wilson ................................................................................................................................ 85

7.3.3 AbacusConsulting ....................................................................................................................... 87

7.3.4 Haidermota & Co. ....................................................................................................................... 89

8 FINANCIALS.................................................................................................................................................... 91

8.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 91

8.2 Tariff Determination ................................................................................................................... 91

8.3 Technical and Operational Assumptions .................................................................................... 92

8.3.1 Project Cost ................................................................................................................................. 92

8.3.2 Capital Structure ......................................................................................................................... 92

8.3.3 Capital Expenditure Plan ............................................................................................................ 92

8.3.4 Project Financing ........................................................................................................................ 93

8.3.5 Operation and Maintenance Costs: ............................................................................................ 93

8.3.6 Projected Generation ................................................................................................................. 94

8.3.7 Fuel Consumption Rate .............................................................................................................. 94

8.3.8 Fuel Cost ..................................................................................................................................... 95

8.3.9 Insurance .................................................................................................................................... 95

8.3.10 Taxation ................................................................................................................................... 95

8.3.11 Customs Duties ........................................................................................................................ 95

8.3.12 PPA Letter of Credit ................................................................................................................. 96

8.3.13 Indexation ................................................................................................................................ 96

8.4 Financial Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 96

9 RISK MITIGATION ........................................................................................................................................ 98

APPENDIX A: DETAILED TARIFF SCHEDULE ............................................................................................. 102

APPENDIX B: FINANCIAL MODEL .................................................................................................................. 103

Page 6: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

vi

ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Abbreviation Description

“Abacus” AbacusConsulting Technologies (Private) Limited “AEPL” Albario Engineering (Private) Limited “AHBL” Arif Habib Bank Limited “AJK” Azad Jammu and Kashmir “ARL” Attock Refinery Limited “bbl/d” Barrels per day “BOI” Board of Investment “BOP” Balance of Plant “BP” British Petroleum “bps” Basis points “Btu” British thermal unit “CAGR” Compound Annual Growth Rate “CERIECO” China East Resource Import and Export Corporation “cft” Cubic foot or cubic feet “CGT” Capital Gains Tax “CHASNUPP” Chashma Nuclear Power Plant “CMEC” China National Machinery and Equipment Import and Export Corporation “COD” Commercial Operations Date “Contractors” EPC Contractors referring to CMEC and CERIECO together as E&P Contractor

and Construction Contractor, respectively “CPI” Consumer Price Index “CPP” Capacity Purchase Price “CPPA” Central Power Purchasing Agency “CSCI” Commission of Social Care Inspection, in UK “DISCO” Government owned Distribution Company unbundled from WAPDA “DSCR” Debt Service Coverage Ratio “DSRA” Debt Service Reserve Account “E&P” Engineering and Procurement “EOI” Expression of Interest “EIA” Environmental Impact Assessment “EPC” Engineering, Procurement and Construction “EPP” Energy Purchase Price “FBR” Federal Board of Revenue “FBS” Federal Bureau of Statistics “FDI” Foreign Direct Investment “Financial Close” The execution of financing documents and equity commitments that evidence

sufficient funding to completely construct and commission the Project. “FSA” Fuel Supply Agreement “GDP” Gross Domestic Product “GENCO” Government owned Generation Companies unbundled from WAPDA “GHG” Grange Holdings Group “GoP” Government of Pakistan “GPL” Grange Power Limited “GW” Gigawatt

Page 7: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

vii

Abbreviation Description

“GWh” Gigawatt hours “HHV” Higher Heat Value “HSD” High Speed Diesel “HSE” Health, Safety and Environment “HSFO” High Sulphur Fuel Oil “IA” Implementation Agreement “IDA” Initial Depreciation Allowance “IDC” Initial Dependable Capacity “IM” Information Memorandum “IMF” International Monetary Fund “Income Tax Ordinance” Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as updated in October 2009 “IPP” Independent Power Producer “IRR” Internal Rate of Return “ISO” International Organization of Standardization, referring in the IM to standard

plant capacity under specific atmospheric conditions such as ambient temperature (150C), altitude (sea level), pressure (1 bar).

“KANUPP” Karachi Nuclear Power Plant “KESC” Karachi Electric Supply Corporation “kg” Kilogram “KIBOR” Karachi Interbank Offered Rate “KPS” Korea Plant Service and Engineering Company Limited “KSE” Karachi Stock Exchange “KSE-100” A stock index used as a benchmark to compare prices on KSE over a period of

time. “kW” Kilowatt “kWh” Kilowatt hour “LC” Letter of Credit “LHV” Lower Heating Value “LIBOR” London Interbank Offered Rate “LOI” Letter of Interest “LOS” Letter of Support “LPG” Liquefied Petroleum Gas “Ltd” Limited – used alone to indicate a public limited company in Pakistan “MGCL” Mari Gas Company Limited “MMCF” Million Cubic Feet “MW” Megawatt “MWh” Megawatt hours “NBP” National Bank of Pakistan “NEPRA” National Electric Power Regulatory Authority “NHBC” National House Building Company “NEQS” National Environmental Quality Standards “NOC” No Objection Certificate “NPCC” National Power Control Center “NPV” Net Present Value “NRL” National Refinery Limited “NTDC” National Transmission and Despatch Company

Page 8: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

viii

Abbreviation Description

“O&M” Operations and Maintenance “OCAC” Oil Companies Advisory Committee “OGDC” Oil and Gas Development Company Limited “OGRA” Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority “OMC” Oil Marketing Company “PAEC” Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission “PARCO” Pak Arab Refinery Corporation “PEPCO” Pakistan Electric Power Company “PES” Pakistan Engineering Services “PKR” Pakistan Rupee “plc” Public limited company in UK “PME” Plant Machinery and Equipment “Power Purchaser” NTDC through CPPA “PPA” Power Purchase Agreement “PPIB” Private Power Infrastructure Board “PPL” Pakistan Petroleum Limited “PRL” Pakistan Refinery Limited “PSO” Pakistan State Oil Company Limited “Pvt. Ltd” Private Limited – used with a private limited company in Pakistan “PwC” Consulting PricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting “RFF” Running Finance Facility “RFO” Residual Fuel Oil also referred to as Furnace Oil “ROA” Return on Assets “ROE” Return on Equity “ROEDC” Return on Equity During Construction “RPP” Rental Power Producer “SBP” State Bank of Pakistan “Scott Wilson” Scott Wilson Group plc “SLCF” Standby Letter of Credit Facility “SNGPL” Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited “SSGC” Sui Southern Gas Company “Tariff Rules” NEPRA’s Tariff Standards and Procedures Rules, 1998 “Tcf” Trillion cubic feet “TFF” Term Finance Facility “TIE” Times Interest Earned “UK” United Kingdom “USA” United States of America “USD” United States Dollar “WAPDA” Water and Power Development Authority “WPI” Wholesale Price Index

Page 9: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

ix

IMPORTANT NOTICE

This confidential Information Memorandum (or “IM”) has been prepared by AbacusConsulting (the

“Advisor”) solely for information purposes from materials provided to the Advisor by Grange Power Ltd

(the “Company”) and their representatives. Other sources of information are largely secondary in

nature, including published data from PPIB, WAPDA and other public sources. No surveys have been

conducted to validate the information gathered from secondary sources, and no formal due diligence

has been conducted to verify information provided by the designated representatives of the Company,

which is assumed to be correct.

This Information Memorandum may be distributed by the Company or its designated representatives

solely for the use of interested investors and financiers to determine whether they would like to

proceed with further investigation into the Project.

Use of this IM is governed by the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement executed with each potential

investor, which strictly limits the circulation and copying of the information contained in this document.

This IM may not be reproduced or used without the prior written approval of the Company or the

Advisor for any purpose other than the evaluation of the Project by the recipient.

The information contained in this Information Memorandum has been prepared in good faith to assist

the recipient in making their own evaluation of the transaction and does not purport to contain all the

information that the recipient may desire. In all cases, the recipient should conduct their own

investigation and analysis of the Project and of the data in this IM. The Advisor does not assume any

responsibility for independent verification of any of the information contained in this IM, including any

statements about the prospects of the Project contained herein. Neither the Company nor the Advisor

makes any representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, fairness or completeness

of this IM or the information contained in, or omitted from, this document. Each expressly disclaims any

and all liability for representations or warranties (express or implied) contained in, or omitted from this

IM or any other written or oral communications transmitted or made available to the recipient in the

course of its evaluation of the transaction.

This Information Memorandum does not constitute or form part of any offer for sale of the equity

interest, nor does it constitute the basis of any contract which may be concluded for such a sale. Only

those particular representations and warranties, if any, which may be made to a party in a definitive

written agreement regarding the transaction, when, as and if executed, and subject to such limitations

and restrictions as may be specified in that agreement, will have any legal effect.

This Important Notice also applies in its entirety to any supplements issued subsequently to this IM,

whatever form those supplements might take. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, each

potential investor agrees that neither the Company nor the Advisor has any liability in relation to use by

any person of the financial projections or other analysis based on the financial model prepared for the

transaction.

Page 10: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

x

The statements, financial estimates and projections in this Information Memorandum and other

information provided in connection with this reflect various assumptions made by the Company

concerning anticipated results and are subject to significant business, economic and competitive

uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Accordingly, no

representations are made by the Company or the Advisor and there can be no assurance that such

statements, estimates and projections will be realized. The actual results will likely vary from the

forecast, and those variations may be material. Neither the Company nor the Advisor makes any

representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such statements, estimates and projections or

that any forecasts will be achieved.

By accepting this Information Memorandum, the recipient acknowledges and agrees to abide by the

statements made in this Important Notice with respect to the confidentiality of information in the IM

and the constraint on reproducing this IM, in whole or in part. Further, by accepting this Information

Memorandum, the recipient shall be deemed to have agreed to the disclaimers made by the Company

and the Advisor in this Important Notice, and to have waived, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any

and all claims against the Company and the Advisor or any of their directors, agents, advisers, officers or

employees, in relation to any matters covered by the disclaimers.

This Information Memorandum and any other information provided in connection with this should not

be construed as the giving of investment advice by the Company or the Advisor. All information

contained in the IM relating to the Company originates from the Company.

This Information Memorandum and the Project as a whole have been prepared in compliance with the

laws of Pakistan. Investors subject to laws of other countries must comply with such relevant laws.

Investors with operations, interests or ownership in other countries should seek their own legal advice

to ensure they remain in compliance with their respective laws in relation to this IM and the Project.

The Company and the Advisor reserve the right, without prior notice, to change the procedure and

process for the investment, or delay or terminate the same, or to terminate discussions with any

potential investor, at any time.

This Important Notice also applies in its entirety to any electronic copies or information transmitted over

the internet.

Page 11: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

11

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Information Memorandum has been developed to assist potential investors and financiers in

making a decision towards investing in Grange Power Limited.

1.1 Transaction Overview

Grange Power Limited (“GPL”) is a public limited company based in Pakistan, established with the

objective of setting up a state-of-the-art power generation plant in Arifwala, Pakistan, with a gross ISO

capacity of 163.35 MW. The IPP is being developed under the Government’s ‘Fast Track’ initiative which

allows it to pass certain otherwise necessary procedural steps and achieve completion in a much shorter

time period.

The Project is at an advanced preconstruction stage: the land has been acquired, tariff determined by

NEPRA (at US¢ 12.4778per kWh), Generation License and other necessary approvals obtained from

NEPRA and various government departments. On the other hand, EPC agreement has been signed with

CMEC and CERIECO with contractual negotiations at the final stage; and other contracts also at advance

stages of negotiation.

The Management of GPL is currently in the process of organizing the Performance Guarantee, subject to

detailed discussions with its lenders following which the LOS shall be issued for the Project by the PPIB.

The draft PPA and IA have been provided to GPL for review and expected to be signed in June 2010,

along with the FSA which is being negotiated with PSO. Negotiations are underway with a local bank to

arrange syndicated project funding for the onshore debt component. Financial Close is expected by July

2010. Commencement of civil works is expected in June 2010 with the COD expected in August 2012.

The total project cost is estimated to be approximately USD 218 million, of which 25 percent or about

USD 54 million is planned as equity and the remaining USD 164 million shall be arranged as long term

loan. The major shareholder in GPL is Grange Holdings Group which currently holds 96 percent of the

total number of shares outstanding. The remaining 4 percent are equally held by Albario Engineering

(Pvt.) Ltd, Mr. Shuja Hussain, Mr. Assad Sheikh and Mr. Amjad Faquir.

The EPC and equipment costs together constitute about 75 percent of the total project cost or USD 164

million. Of this, USD 28 million is estimated as the onshore component and is planned to be arranged

through local banks, whereas the offshore cost of USD 136 million shall be organized through foreign

banks and financial institutions.

Page 12: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

12

1.2 Investment Environment in Pakistan

Pakistan is the sixth most populous nation in the world, with an approximately 164 million inhabitants

(2009 estimates).It is strategically located in the South Asian corridor, bordering India, China,

Afghanistan, Iran and the Arabian Sea.

The Government of Pakistan is in the process of political, economic and institutional reform, with a view

to strengthening the economy of the country, eliminating corruption from the government and

improving the investment environment in Pakistan.

The following table summarizes Pakistan’s economic performance over the past 5 years:

Table 1.1: Pakistan Economic Indicators

Economic Indicator FY05

Actual

FY06

Actual

FY07

Actual

FY08

Actual

FY09*

Provisional

Macroeconomics Real GDP Growth 9.0% 5.8% 6.8% 4.1% 2.4% Agriculture Growth 6.5% 6.3% 4.1% 1.1% 4.7% Manufacturing Growth 15.5 10.0 8.4 4.8 (3.3) Population (Million) 151 153 156 159 163 Per Capita Income( USD) 733 833 925 1,042 1,046 Financial Conditions External Debt Outstanding ( USD Billion) 34.04 35.68 37.36 46.3 50.1 Debt Servicing as % of GDP 4.7 4.8 3.8 1.1 0.8 Forex Reserves ( USD Billion) 10.9 13.1 12.9 15.8 11.4 Budget Surplus/ (Deficit) (USD Billion) (5,649) (4,556) (6,212) (11,173) (8,547) Inflation (CPI) 9.3% 7.9% 7.7% 12% 22.3% Exchange Rate (PKR : USD) 59.8 59.8 60.6 62.5 78.0 KSE-100 Index (as of yearend June 30) 7450.12 9989.41 13772.46 12289.03 7162.18 Trade Total Exports Current Price (USD Billion) 14.3 16.4 13.9 19.0 14.7 Total Imports Current Price (USD Billion ) 20.5 28.5 24.9 39.9 28.9 Export Growth 16.8% 14.3% 3.2% 12.2% -3.03% Import Growth 32.1% 38.7% 6.8% 30.8% -9.78%

* Provisional Results Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan 2008-09

A number of manufacturing and non manufacturing sectors are now open to foreign investors, and this

coupled with the resilience the country has shown in the wake of the most testing of economic times,

means that the country remains an attractive option for potential investors.

Page 13: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

13

1.3 Pakistan Energy Sector Overview

The Government of Pakistan has identified the energy sector in Pakistan as playing a pivotal role in the

development and growth of the Pakistan economy. GoP has stated the main objectives of its policy for

the Pakistan energy sector as ensuring adequate, secure and cost effective supplies; efficient utilization

of resources; and minimization of negative environmental impacts.

The key sources of primary energy in Pakistan are oil, gas and hydroelectricity. Petroleum products and

natural gas account for almost 80 percent of commercial energy, hydroelectricity for about 11 percent

and the rest is made up by coal, liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) and nuclear energy.

1.3.1 Power Sector

Historically, the power sector in Pakistan has consisted of two major state-owned utilities: WAPDA and

KESC which have operated largely independent of each other and servicing separate regions. In 1994,

the power sector was opened up to private investors through the formation of PPIB, and a host of policy

initiatives under the Power Sector Policies of 1994, 1998 and 2002, along with transmission and hydel

policies liberalized the power sector to a great degree. The following table details the five year trend of

installed generation capacity of Pakistan:

Table 1.2: Installed Generation Capacity

(Capacity in MW)

Year ending June 30 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

Thermal Power GENCOs 4835 4900 4900 4900 4900 IPPs (connected with PEPCO system) 5570 5560 5560 5560 5725 IPPs (connected with KESC system) 262 262 262 262 262 KESC 1756 1756 1756 1756 1955 Total Thermal Capacity 12423 12785 12785 12785 12842

Hydel Power WAPDA 6464 6444 6444 6444 6444 IPPs 35 35 35 36 37 Total Hydel Capacity 6499 6474 6474 6480 6481

Nuclear Power CHASNUPP (connected with PEPCO system) 325 325 325 325 325 KANUPP (connected with KESCL system) 137 137 137 137 137 Total Nuclear Capacity 462 462 462 462 462

Total Installed Capacity of the Country

19384

19450

19420

19420

19786

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Page 14: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

14

With the growing energy demand, the country is currently facing a power shortage of approximately

2500 to 3000 MW, and some analysts predict the demand will exceed supply by 5000 MW during the

summer peak of 2010. The present electricity demand-supply gap, coupled with a consistent growth in

demand clearly indicates the fundamental need for enhancing the country’s power generation

capability. The PPIB projects the demand-supply gap to be as follows:

Figure 1.1: Demand and Supply Projections (MW)

1.3.2 Regulatory and Institutional Framework

The regulatory and institutional

framework of the power sector in

Pakistan can be summarized as

shown in adjacent figure.

The regulation of the electricity

sector is governed by the NEPRA

Act 1997 which replaced the

provisions of the Electricity Act,

1910. NEPRA was constituted

under this Act as an independent

regulatory authority for

regulating the provision of

electric power services. It is

exclusively empowered to

regulate the generation,

distribution and transmission of

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

'00

0 M

W

Expected Available Generation (MW) Demand (Summer Peak) (MW)

Tariff advisor

Investment facilitation

Investment review

Licensing, Tariffs

Tariff advisor

Regulatory guidelines

Federal Government Provincial Governments and AJK

Ministry of Water & Power

Cabinet Division

Provincial representation NEPRA

PPIB

Provincial Private Power Cells

Policy and

legislative framework

WAPDA (and successors)

KESC

IPPs

Power Sector

Page 15: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

15

electrical power in Pakistan with respect to determining tariff rates, prescription and enforcement of

performance standards and codes of conduct, issuance of licenses and other terms and conditions to

encourage safe, efficient and reliable service.

1.4 The Project

GPL was incorporated on March 25, 2008, and received its certificate for commencement of business on

May 13, 2008. The purpose of the Company is to build, own and operate a modern power generation

plant, for onward sale and supply of electricity to NTDC.

The Project is a brand new dual-fired Combined Cycle power generation plant, having a gross capacity

(at ISO conditions) of 163.353 MW, and a dependable capacity at site of 146.5 MW. The primary fuel for

the power plant is Residual Fuel Oil with High Speed Diesel as the back-up fuel. GPL was granted a

generation license on July 8, 2009 for a period expiring on December 30, 2035.

The site for the Project is an area of 30 acres located at Kamair at 15-km Arifwala-Sahiwal Road, in Tehsil

and District Pakpattan. The allocated land was acquired and duly transferred to GPL on August 7, 2009.

Load flow studies have been carried out to ascertain the technical viability of the location and its vicinity

to a 132 kV grid station. The area has the necessary infrastructure in place and is easily accessible

through a newly constructed metal road. Environmental Impact Assessment studies, topographical

survey and considerable land development has been carried out in preparation of the civil works.

The Company signed an EPC Agreement with CMEC as the Lead E&P Contractor and its subsidiary

CERIECO, as the Construction Contractor in November 2008. A comprehensive EPC contract is expected

to be finalized and signed by April 2010, and work on engineering, procurement and civil works is

expected to commence immediately afterwards and be completed over a period of 26 months.

NEPRA determined the final tariff for GPL on December 30, 2009 at US¢ 12.4778 per kWh (levelized

basis), applicable for a period of 25 years from COD, summarized as follows:

Table 1.3: GPL Tariff Determined by NEPRA

Tariff Components Year 1-10 Year 11-25

Total Capacity Charge (PKR/ kWh) 3.0969 1.0059 Energy Charge based on RFO (PKR/ kWh) Fuel Cost Component (RFO) Variable O&M (Foreign)

5.4625 0.4691

5.4625 0.4691

Levelized Tariff (at 60% Plant Factor) US¢ 12.4778/ kWh

Page 16: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

16

The current shareholding structure of GPL is provided in the table below:

Table 1.4 : GPL Shareholding Structure

Shareholders/ Sponsors

Shareholding No. of Shares

Grange Holdings Group 96% 421,291,825 Albario Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd 1% 4,388,457 Mr Assad Sheikh 1% 4,388,457 Mr. Shuja Hussain 1% 4,388,457 Mr. Amjad Faquir 1% 4,388,457 Total 100% 438,845,651

Grange Power Ltd has engaged and/or is in the process of finalizing contracts with the following advisors

and contractors:

Table 1.5: GPL’s Advisors, Consultants and Contractors

Company Role Status

CMEC * E&P Contractor Agreement signed. Contract expected to be signed in April 2010.

CERIECO* (CMEC’s subsidiary)

Construction Contractor Agreement signed. Contract expected be signed in April 2010.

KPS O&M Contractor Terms agreed. Commercial negotiations at final stage.

Scott Wilson Project/ Construction Manager

Negotiations at advanced stage.

Arif Habib Bank Co-Lead Arranger for onshore debt component

Negotiations at advanced stage.

Haidermota & Co Legal Counsel Negotiations in final stage AbacusConsulting Project Advisor Current KPMG Taseer Haid & Co Auditors Negotiations in final stage.

* CMEC and CERIECO have signed a tripartite agreement with GPL for providing turnkey EPC services. They are

referred together as “Contractors” to GPL.

1.5 The Financials

Financial projections have been prepared based on the information provided by the Management of

GPL and the NEPRA Tariff Determination of December 30, 2009. The costs, rates, indexation and other

assumptions approved by NEPRA have been used to make the 25-year projections, the term duration

allowed for GPL based on the expected life of the Project. A summary of key findings is as follows:

The Project reflects an internal rate of return (“IRR”) of 16.24 percent, in real terms. This becomes

more attractive in view of the assured 25-year tariff and sale of capacity and generation output.

Page 17: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

17

Debt-to-Equity ratio is a maximum of 64% : 36% at the end of the first year of operations, tapering

down to 0% : 100% in the 9th year - towards the end of the ten year repayment term.

In terms of ability to meet financing obligations, the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (“DSCR”) remains

at a constant of 1.34 over the debt servicing period.

Earnings provide sufficient coverage for making interest payments, as demonstrated by the Times

Interest Earned (“TIE”) which does not drop below 1.3 at any time throughout the 25 years, with an

average of 2.02. During the first ten years, over the tenure of the loan, the average remains at 2.57.

In terms of return on equity, the tariff is built to allow GPL a ROE of 15 percent. The various

measures used in the financial model reflect these returns as: Dividend IRR of 14.88 percent, Equity

IRR of 14.53 percent and an Actual ROE of 16.61 percent.

The cumulative closing cash balances, after dividend payout and debt-servicing, remains a healthy

positive throughout the 25-year period.

The table below briefly highlights the financial results for GPL:

Table 1.6: Financial Analysis- Project Base Case

Financial Indicators

Project Results (Base Case) IRR 16.24% NPV at 15% (USD) 6,782,687 NPV at 13% (USD) 21,303,067 ROE (approx.) 15% Payback (based on Cumulative Net Cashflow) 6th Year Payback (based on Cumulative Discounted Net Cashflow) 12th Year Debt Service Coverage during loan period 1.34 Average Times Interest Earned 2.02 Average Times Interest Earned (EBITDA) 5.43 Average Net Margin 7.81% Equity Results (as per NEPRA) IRR 15.07% NPV at 15% (USD) 187,067 NPV at 13% (USD) 5,663,151

Page 18: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

18

2. TRANSACTION OVERVIEW

2.1 Introduction

Grange Power Limited has been formed with the objective of setting up a state-of-the-art power

generation plant in Arifwala, Pakistan, with a gross ISO capacity of 163.35 MW. This independent power

project (“IPP”) is being developed under the Government’s ‘Fast Track’ initiative which allows the

Project to pass certain otherwise necessary procedural steps and achieve completion in a much shorter

time period (see section 4.3.1 for details).

2.2 Project Status

As of February 2010, the following steps have been completed by the GPL’s Management:

Table 2.1 Milestones Achieved

Milestones Dates

Expression of interest to PPIB for setting up an IPP under their recently introduced Fast Track policy initiative

December 12, 2007

Registration with PPIB under the Fast Track initiative (PPIB Registration No. 1052)

February 25, 2008

Public Limited Company ‘Grange Power Ltd’ incorporated (Certificate of Incorporation No. 0064883)

March 25, 2008

Firm of Chartered Accountants engaged as auditors for GPL: KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co.

In negotiation

Application Proposal submitted to PPIB as per policy requirements April 21, 2008

Site approval and allocation by PEPCO and NTDC May 2008

EPC Agreement signed on a turnkey basis with CMEC and CERIECO, a subsidiary of CMEC

November 7, 2008

Petition to NEPRA for tariff determination December 15, 2008

Application to NEPRA for Generation License December 16, 2008

Load-flow studies completed by NTDC/PEPCO February 2009

EIA Report submitted to Environmental Protection Department, Government of Punjab (awaiting NOC)

June 4, 2009

Tariff determination by NEPRA June 26, 2009

Review petition to NEPRA for revised tariff July 7, 2009

Generation License granted by NEPRA July 8, 2009

Acquisition of land and transfer to GPL August 7, 2009

Topographical survey conducted by Berkley Associates October 2009

O&M contract terms agreed with KPS November 2009

Law firm engaged as legal counsel to oversee the implementation process, and agreements with government and third parties. Currently Haidermota & Co.

December 2009

Page 19: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

19

Milestones Dates

Revised tariff determined by NEPRA December 30, 2009

Layout plan developed by CMEC January 2010

In-Principle Agreement with Arif Habib Bank Ltd to arrange a syndicated loan, covering at least the onshore cost component

February 2010

Firm of Management Consultants engaged for financial and strategic advice. Currently AbacusConsulting

February 2010

Terms agreed with Scott Wilson, the proposed project and construction management firm.

In negotiation

2.3 Current Status

The PPIB, in its letter dated January 18, 2010, has requested the Management of GPL to make the

necessary payments with respect to the Processing Fee and also submit the requisite Performance

Guarantee at the rate of USD 5000 per MW. The Management is currently in the process of arranging

such guarantee, subject to detailed discussions with their bankers.

2.4 Way Forward

The next key steps and milestones in the implementation process up to the Commercial Operations Date

(“COD”) are envisaged as follows:

Table 2.2 Milestones until COD

Milestones Expected Completion Dates

Submission of Performance Guarantee (in process) April 2010

EPC Contract signed with CMEC and CERIECO (agreement signed)

April 2010

LOS Issued by PPIB April 2010

PPA signed with CPPA/NTDC June 2010

FSA signed with PSO (in negotiation) June 2010

IA signed with the Government of Pakistan June 2010

Commencement of civil works June 2010

Financial Close July 2010

Trial Run August 2012

Commercial Operations Date August 2012

Page 20: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

20

2.5 Capital Structure

The total project cost is estimated to be approximately USD 218.20 million, of which 25 percent or about

USD 54.55 million is planned as equity and the remaining USD 163.35 shall be arranged as long term

loan.

The major shareholder in GPL is Grange Holdings Group (“GHG”) which currently holds 96 percent of the

total number of shares outstanding. The remaining 4 percent are equally held by Albario Engineering

(Pvt.) Ltd, Mr. Shuja Hussain, Mr. Assad Sheikh and Mr. Amjad Faquir.

The EPC and equipment costs together constitute more than 75 percent of the total project cost, almost

equivalent to the debt portion of total capital. Of this USD 164 million, USD 28 million is estimated as the

onshore component and is planned to be arranged through local banks, whereas the offshore cost of

USD 136 million shall be organized through foreign banks and financial institutions.

Fig 2.1. Capital Structure

25% Equity

(USD 54M)

75% Debt

(USD 164M)

83% Offshore EPC cost

(USD 136M)

17% Onshore EPC cost

(USD 28M)

GHG 96% (USD 52M)

Others 4% (USD 2M)

(Assad Sheikh, Shuja

Hussain, Amjad Faquir,

and AEPL)

Page 21: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

21

2.6 Communication with the Company

All questions on this transaction should be directed to Mr. Shuja Hussain as key point of contact, at

either of the following addresses:

Mr. Assad Sheikh Chairman Grange Power Ltd. Unit 7, The Quadrant, Upper Culham Farm Cockpole Green Berkshire R610 8NR Tel: +44 (1) 1491 576544 Fax: +44 (1) 1491 576194 Mob: +44 (0) 7703123252 email: [email protected]

Mr. Shuja Hussain Chief Executive Grange Power Ltd. 2nd Floor, 65-Z Commercial Area, DHA Lahore Lahore Cantt., Pakistan Tel: +92(0) 42 3702 9285 Fax: +92(0) 42 3589 2743 Mobile: +92(0) 300 8436999 email: [email protected] email: [email protected]

Page 22: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

22

3. INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT IN PAKISTAN

3.1 Introduction

The Government of Pakistan is in the process of political, economic and institutional reform, with a view

to strengthening the economy of the country, eliminating corruption from the government and

improving the investment environment in Pakistan.

The economy of the country has been affected by the tensions on the border and the security situation,

however, the economic policies and reforms of the Government of Pakistan (“GoP”) and the support

given to the international campaign against terrorism are expected to restore political and economic

confidence in the country. Recent economic policies designed under the watchful eye of the

International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) along with some monetary support extended by the Western

powers in-lieu of the country’s role as a front line state in the global war against terrorism have started

to bear some fruit.

Investment in any country brings about growth and prosperity for the people of that country, and

Pakistan bears no exception to this fact. GoP has also actively sought to encourage foreign direct

investment in Pakistan to the extent that over 600 foreign companies have now established operations

in Pakistan in addition to the flow of hot money witnessed in the Karachi Stock Exchange in recent years.

It has adopted a policy of openness to foreign investment; it offers a range of incentives to attract

foreign investors; and it has welcomed foreign interest in its wide-ranging privatization program, which,

after a lull, is now resuming. China, UAE, Saudi Arabia, USA, UK and others remain amongst the leading

countries responsible for inward FDI flow to Pakistan. Chinese investment in Pakistan according to

analyst estimates tops USD 20 billion, and there are currently more than 120 projects initiated by China

in Pakistan. Thereby China remains at the helm of the country’s foreign investment portfolio.

The current democratically elected government has ensured continuation of the investment policies

initiated by the previous government in order to attract and retain interest of investors both from home

as well as outside Pakistan.

3.2 Political Situation

Pakistan operates under a parliamentary system of governance, with a bi-cameral legislature, including

the National Assembly and the Senate. The National Assembly is composed of directly elected

representatives of the people on adult franchise basis. The Senate is composed of members elected by

the Provincial Assemblies (and in some cases the National Assembly) with equal representation of all the

four Provinces of the federation.

As a result of the elections held on February 18, 2008, a coalition government has been formed by the

PPP which emerged as the largest party. The present Prime Minister, Mr. Yousuf Raza Gilani, was sworn

in on March 25, 2008, after earning a unanimous vote of confidence from the parliament.

Page 23: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

23

3.3 Legal System

The current legal system in Pakistan is a mixture of codified law based on English legal principles and

common law, post-independence legislation (based on the common law system) and the relatively

recent introduction of certain laws based on Islamic principles, referred to as the “Shari’ah”.

Broadly, the Courts of Pakistan consist of city/ district courts, the Provincial High Courts, the Federal

Shariah Court and the Supreme Court of Pakistan which is the highest court in Pakistan at the Federal

level. Generally, an appeal from a decision of the High Court lies to a superior (Divisional Bench) of such

High Court and then to the Supreme Court. Most issues affecting business do not fall under the

jurisdiction of the Shariah Court. Generally, most commercial activities are regulated by codified law

based on English legal principles and common law practice and by civil courts.

3.4 The Economy

Pakistan is the sixth most populous nation in the world, with approximately 164 million people as of

2009. The major sectors of Pakistan’s economy are agriculture (6%), industry (21%) and services (73%),

with the services sector recording solid growth over the past few years. The following table illustrates

key economic indicators for Pakistan over the last five years:

Table 3.1: Pakistan Economic Indicators

Economic Indicator FY05

Actual

FY06

Actual

FY07

Actual

FY08

Actual

FY09*

Provisional

Macroeconomics Real GDP Growth 9.0% 5.8% 6.8% 4.1% 2.4% Agriculture Growth 6.5% 6.3% 4.1% 1.1% 4.7% Manufacturing Growth 15.5 10.0 8.4 4.8 (3.3) Population (Million) 151 153 156 159 163 Per Capita Income( USD) 733 833 925 1,042 1,046 Financial Conditions External Debt Outstanding ( USD Billion) 34.04 35.68 37.36 46.3 50.1 Debt Servicing as % of GDP 4.7 4.8 3.8 1.1 0.8 Forex Reserves ( USD Billion) 10.9 13.1 12.9 15.8 11.4 Budget Surplus/ (Deficit) (USD Billion) (5,649) (4,556) (6,212) (11,173) (8,547) Inflation (CPI) 9.3% 7.9% 7.7% 12% 22.3% Exchange Rate (PKR : USD) 59.8 59.8 60.6 62.5 78.0 KSE-100 Index (as of yearend June 30) 7450.12 9989.41 13772.46 12289.03 7162.18 Trade Total Exports Current Price (USD Billion) 14.3 16.4 13.9 19.0 14.7 Total Imports Current Price (USD Billion ) 20.5 28.5 24.9 39.9 28.9 Export Growth % 16.8% 14.3% 3.2% 12.2% -3.03% Import Growth % 32.1% 38.7% 6.8% 30.8% -9.78%

*Note: Provisional Results Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan 2008-09

Page 24: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

24

The performance of economic growth of Pakistan remained outstanding from FY2002 to FY2007.

Pakistan transformed into a stable economy through good macroeconomic policies along with structural

reforms. Average real GDP growth during this period was the best of many decades. However following

global and domestic shocks, the economy came temporarily off its rails in FY2009. The economic growth

at 2 percent in FY2009 whilst stable has been severely undervalued since earlier estimates of around 4

percent. Nevertheless the positive growth figure is still reflective of the relative resilience of the

economy to global phenomenon, including the slowdown in the world economy and rapid increases in

the prices of petroleum products and other natural resources. Pakistan’s real GDP has been growing at

an average rate of approximately 5.5 percent per annum over the last five fiscal years (FY2005 to

FY2009).

Pakistan, until recently, has been considered as one of the fastest growing economies of the region

which includes heavyweights such as China, India, and Vietnam. This performance was a result of a

combination of generally good economic policies and dynamic structural reforms. The last two years

have been difficult for Pakistan and the economy has lost significant momentum. One of the prime

contributors to this is the country’s proactive role in the war on terror. Pakistan, being a frontline state,

has had to bear the brunt of the events that have unfolded after 9/11. Conservative estimates place the

cost of this war at approximately USD35 billion since 2001 with this cost intensifying in the last fiscal

year as the situation in Afghanistan deteriorated. However, GoP has initiated a host of macroeconomic

policies and Pakistan is expected to weather the storm, improve the economic outlook and come out of

this challenging phase in the near term.

3.4.1 Key Highlights of FY2009

Economic reform has, in recent years, become a priority for the GoP. The key achievements of FY2009,

despite the regional and global challenges, include:

A steady economic growth of 2 percent despite the pursuance of tight monetary policy resulting

in interest rate increases, and the global financial turmoil

Stellar overall agricultural growth at 4.7 percent. Major crops accounting for 33.4 percent of

agricultural value-added registered an impressive growth of 7.7 percent. Livestock sector grew

at 3.7 percent.

Small and medium manufacturing sector maintained a healthy growth of 7.5 percent;

The overall services sector maintained solid pace of expansion at 3.6 percent

With strong average economic growth of 6 percent during the last six years, Pakistan continues

to maintain its position as one of the fastest growing economies in the Asian region

Per capita income in current dollar terms rose to USD 1,046

Real private consumption grew by 5.2 percent as against negative growth of 1.3 percent

attained last year

Trade balance improved by 15.9 percent as the trade deficit declined from USD16.8 billion to

USD14.2 billion as compared to previous year figures;

Despite monetary policy tightening, the credit to private sector continued with a net

disbursement of PKR 26.8 billion

Page 25: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

25

Weighted average lending rate has witnessed a decline from 15.5 percent in October 2008 to

14.3 percent in March 2009

The overall fiscal deficit is estimated to have been restricted to 4.3 percent

A sharp decline in inflation from 25 percent in FY2008 to 17 percent

A reduction in the current account deficit from as high as 8.5 percent of GDP to around 5.3

percent

Build up of foreign exchange reserves beyond USD 14 billion

Workers’ remittances totalled USD 6.4 billion in FY2009, depicting an increase of 19.5 percent

over previous year

3.4.2 Exchange Rate

Exchange rates between the Pakistan Rupee (“PKR”) and other major world currencies are under a free

exchange rate system, with the US Dollar being used as an intervention currency to determine rates with

other currencies. As of February 15, 2010, the interbank rate for USD 1.00 stood at PKR 84.97121 .

3.4.3 Credit Rating

Standard and Poor’s outlook on Pakistan’s sovereign local and foreign currency ratings are as follows:

Table 3.2: S&P Credit Ratings

Country Sovereign local

currency ratings

(LT/Outlook/ST)

Sovereign foreign

currency ratings

(LT/Outlook/ST)

Sovereign foreign

currency recovery

rating

Transfer and

convertibility

assessment

Pakistan B-/Stable/C B-/Stable/C 3 B-

Source: Standard & Poor’s (Sovereign Ratings and Country T&C Assessments as of 26th

January 20102.

3.5 Capital Markets

Pakistan has three active stock exchanges, namely the Karachi Stock Exchange, the Lahore Stock

Exchange and Islamabad Stock Exchange. Karachi Stock Exchange (“KSE”) is the country’s largest and

oldest exchange, established in 1947, with more than 85 percent of the total trading volume being

routed through it. KSE’s profile is summarized in the table below.

1 As per State Bank of Pakistan

Page 26: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

26

Table 3.3: KSE Profile

KSE Profile FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09*

Number of Listed Companies 659 658 658 652 652 New Companies Listed 15 14 16 7 8 Fund Mobilized (PKR billion) 54 41.4 49.7 62.9 42.3 Listed Capital (PKR billion) 438.5 496 631.1 706.4 770.7 Turnover of Shares (billion) 88.3 79.5 54 63.3 17.1 Average Daily Turnover of Shares (million) 351.9 348.5 262.5 238.2 80.2 Aggregate Market Capitalization (PKR billion)

2068.2 2801.2 4019.4 3777.7 2057.1

*During FY2009, the stock market remained frozen for 110 consecutive days as a result of floor imposition on KSE-

100

Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan 2008/09

KSE remained one of the best performing stock exchanges in the global emerging markets, during the

most part of this past decade. It continues to show resilience even in the aftermath of the global

financial meltdown. This is due to the liberalized policies and reforms initiated by the previous

government, which have been continued by the current government in order to strengthen the financial

markets in Pakistan. The trend over the past one year up to January 2010 can be seen in the following

graph:

Figure 3.1: KSE-100 Index Movement - 2009

At the end of February 16, 2010 session, the KSE-100 index gained 67.87 points to close at 9769.68

points. Trading volumes whilst on the lower side at 120.588 million shares, remain amongst the highest

since the stock exchange’s recovery, indicating growing confidence among investors. The overall market

capitalization was up by PKR 23 billion as compared with the previous session and traded at PKR 2.812

Trillion.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

KSE

-10

0 In

dex

Page 27: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

27

Figure 3.2: KSE-100 Index Volume as of February 16, 2010

Source: Market Watch

3.6 Policy Incentives for Foreign Investors

Government of Pakistan’s industrial policy is designed to encourage foreign and local investment in the private sector. Full safeguards are provided to protect lawful investment. The government’s role in the management of industry is to rapidly shift to a regulatory role in order to encourage private investment. Emphasis will be on expanding competition and creating new opportunities for the private sector by an encouraging government to phase out controls over prices and investment decisions, reduce subsidies and other special incentives which prevent competition from spurring efficiency and innovation. A key step in this regard has been the establishment of the Board of Investment (“BOI”), which is headed by the Prime Minister and constitutes of members from both the government and the private sector in order to boost foreign investor interest in the nation’s economy.

Analysing the investment policies of the GoP it is found that foreign investment is permitted in all sectors of the economy without prior approval of the BOI except in those industries involving arms and ammunition, security, printing currency and mint, high explosives, and radioactive substances. State Bank of Pakistan’s (“SBP”) permission is no longer required for the issuance of shares in a service company. The foreign investment is however required to be registered with the SBP to facilitate the payment of dividend, if any. Multinational joint ventures are encouraged to improve foreign investment. Establishment of export-oriented industries is given preference.

Pakistan's policy trends have been consistent with liberalization, deregulation, privatization and facilitation with incentives specifically designed to fulfil the needs of investors. Previously only the manufacturing sector was open to foreign investment. Now, the Policy Regime is more liberal with most other economic sectors open for foreign involvement and with significant efforts towards mobilizing domestic financial resources towards long term investment.

Key features of Pakistan’s foreign investment policy instrument for most manufacturing, non-manufacturing, infrastructure and social sectors are:

Page 28: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

28

Liberal investment policy

Equal treatment to local and foreign investors

Sectors open for Foreign Direct Investment

100 percent foreign equity allowed in the manufacturing and non manufacturing sectors

No Government sanction required

Attractive incentives package

Remittance of royalty, technical and franchise fee; capital, profits and dividends allowed

Foreign investment fully protected under:

Foreign Private Investment (Promotion & Protection) Act, 1976

Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992

Foreign Currency Accounts (Protection) Ordinance, 2001

Bilateral Agreements:

Investment Protection to 48 countries

Avoidance of Double Taxation to 51 Countries

3.6.1 Investment Incentive Package

According to the BOI, the Government has provided an attractive incentive package for investors, as

highlighted below:

Table 3.4: Investment Incentive Package

Policy Parameters Manufacturing Sector Non-Manufacturing Sectors

Agriculture Infrastructure

Social

Services incl. IT and Telecom

Services

Govt. Permission Not required except for specified industries

Not required except specific licenses from concerned agencies

Remittance of capital, profits, dividends, etc.

Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed

Upper Limit of foreign equity allowed

100% 100% 100% 100%

Minimum Investment Amount (USD)

No 0.3 0.3 0.15

Customs duty on import of PME

5% 0% 5% 0-5%

Tax relief (IDA*, % of PME cost*)

50% 50% 50% 50%

Royalty & Technical Fee

No restriction for payment of royalty & technical fee

Allowed as per guidelines – Initial lump sum up to USD100,000 – Max Rate 5% of net sales – Initial

period 5 years

* PME: Plant Machinery and Equipment; IDA: Initial Depreciation Allowance Source: Board of Investment

Page 29: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

29

3.6.2 Exchange Control

Repatriation of capital, capital gains, dividends and profits, is allowed.

The facility for contracting foreign private loans (which does not involve any guarantee by the Government of Pakistan) is available to all those foreign investors, who make investment in sectors open to foreign investment, for financing the cost of imported plant and machinery required for setting up the project. However, loan agreements should be registered/ cleared by the State Bank of Pakistan.

Foreign controlled manufacturing concerns are allowed unlimited domestic borrowing according to their requirements for working capital.

For foreign controlled semi-manufacturing concerns, the borrowing entitlement is 75 percent of paid-up capital including reserves and for foreign controlled non-manufacturing concerns (trade/services) it is 50 percent.

3.7 Tax Regimes

The Federal Board of Revenue (“FBR”) is the tax administrative authority in Pakistan, which carries out

taxation policies and administers all taxes (income tax, sales tax, central excise duty and customs duty).

Pakistan’s tax system is irregular, with a narrow tax base covering a relatively small section of income

earners.

3.7.1 Tax Rates

Corporate Income Tax:

According to the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 (updated October 2009), the rate of tax imposed on the

taxable income of a company shall be 35 percent.

Personal Income Tax:

Personal income tax rates applicable for FY2010 are given in the following table:

Page 30: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

30

Table 3.5: Personal Income Tax:

Income Range Tax Rate* Where taxable income does not exceed PKR 100,000 0% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 100,000 but does not exceed PKR 110,000 0.50% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 110,000 but does not exceed PKR 125,000 1.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 125,000 but does not exceed PKR 150,000 2.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 150,000 but does not exceed PKR 175,000 3.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 175,000 but does not exceed PKR 200,000 4.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 200,000 but does not exceed PKR 300,000 5.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 300,000 but does not exceed PKR 400,000 7.50% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 400,000 but does not exceed PKR 500,000 10.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 500,000 but does not exceed PKR 600,000 12.50% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 600,000 but does not exceed PKR 800,000 15.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 800,000 but does not exceed PKR 1,000,000 17.50% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 1,000,000 but does not exceed PKR 1,300,000 21.00% Where the taxable income exceeds PKR 1,300,000 25.00%

* Provided that the salary is less than 50% of total annual taxable income A second bracket for individuals with salaries constituting more than 50% has also been added as an update to the Income Tax Act 2001.

Source: Federal Board of Revenue

3.7.2 Withholding Tax

The following withholding tax rates are prescribed for every resident assessee:

Table 3.6: Withholding Tax

Description Tax Rate Execution of contract 6.0% of gross amount payable Payment on account of supplies 3.5% of gross amount payable

Source: Federal Board of Revenue

3.7.3 Inter-Corporate Dividend Tax

In general, dividends paid by a company resident in Pakistan are taxed at 10 percent of the gross

amount of the dividend. Furthermore, the tax rate on dividends paid by the purchaser of a power

project privatised by WAPDA is reduced to 7.5 percent. Also the taxation rate shall be reduced to 7.5

percent in case of dividends declared or distributed, on shares of a company set-up for power

generation.

3.7.4 Unilateral Relief

A person resident in Pakistan is entitled to tax relief on any income earned abroad, if such income has

already been subjected to tax outside Pakistan. Proportionate relief is allowed on such income at an

average rate of tax in Pakistan or abroad, whichever is lower.

Page 31: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

31

3.7.5 Tax Treaties

The Government has an agreement with fifty-seven countries to avoid double taxation and also lays

down basic principles of taxation, which cannot be modified unilaterally. These countries include among

others, China, France, Korea, UAE, UK and USA.

3.7.6 Capital Gains Tax

The current exemptions from capital gains tax (“CGT”) are on any dealings in shares, investment in

redeemable capital listed on a registered stock exchange in Pakistan and Pakistan Telecommunication

Corporation Vouchers issued by the Government of Pakistan. These exemptions have been extended

further up to June, 2010. Gain on sale of shares of companies located in the export processing zones is

exempt from CGT unconditionally.

Page 32: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

32

4. PAKISTAN ENERGY SECTOR

4.1 Energy Sector Overview

The Government of Pakistan has identified the energy sector in Pakistan as playing a pivotal role in the

development and growth of the Pakistan economy. GoP has stated the main objectives of its policy for

the Pakistan energy sector as ensuring:

Adequate, secure and cost effective supplies

Efficient utilization of resources

Minimization of negative environmental impacts

The key primary sources of energy in Pakistan are oil, gas and hydroelectricity. Petroleum products and

natural gas account for almost 80 percent of commercial energy, hydroelectricity for about 11 percent

and the rest is made up by coal, liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) and nuclear energy. Major energy

sources are discussed in more detail in later sections.

The Government’s actions have focused on promoting private investments in all the sub-sectors of the

energy sector, establishing regulatory agencies, and facilitating gradual movement towards competition

and free market mechanism. The GoP asserts its long term goal as creating a competitive, efficiently run,

financially viable, and largely privatised energy sector maximizing service outreach to the population.

4.1.1 Oil

About 30 percent of commercial energy consumption in Pakistan comes from oil. Pakistan produces

60,000 to 70,000 barrels per day (“bbl/d”) of crude oil annually. However, Pakistan’s annual

consumption of petroleum products (petroleum energy and non energy products combined) is in excess

of 370,000 bbl/d requiring net annual oil imports of over 300,000 bbl/d. GoP has encouraged the

development of domestic production and refining capacity by the private sector.

According to records, 11 companies are currently active in oil and gas exploration and production in

Pakistan including global giants such as BP (British Petroleum) and Malaysia’s Petronas. This number is

expected to increase as more and more local and foreign companies are showing interest in the sector.

Pakistan's net oil imports are projected to rise substantially also in the coming years as demand growth

exceeds increases in production. Demand for refined petroleum products also significantly exceeds

domestic refining capacity, so nearly half of all imports are refined products.

A summary of crude oil production in Pakistan is set out in the following graph:

Page 33: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

33

Figure 4.1: Crude Oil Production (bbl/d)

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Pakistan has a total refining capacity of 12.95 million tonnes per year. Nearly 82 percent of this capacity

is utilized to meet the consumption while the rest of the processed crude oil is imported. This refining

process results in a total of about 10.7 million tonnes of various petroleum products - meeting around

60 percent of the local consumption. There are seven oil refineries in the country with the latest

addition being Bosicor Refinery which commenced production in FY 2004. Other major ones include Pak

Arab Refinery Corporation (“PARCO”), National Refinery Ltd (“NRL”), Pakistan Refinery Limited (“PRL”)

and Attock Refinery Limited (“ARL”). The refineries produce a full range of products, however only 30

percent of their energy products production is furnace oil (also referred to as fuel oil or residual fuel oil)

which means that to satisfy national demand nearly 55.5 percent has to be imported.

Residual Furnace Oil (“RFO”) and High Speed Diesel (“HSD”) are amongst the most dominant sources of

energy production in the country, and account for an average of 36 percent and 49 percent respectively

of the aggregate petroleum energy products consumed in the country3. The demand for RFO has seen

average growth of around 17 percent over the five years spanning FY2004 to FY2009. Much of the

demand has come from the power sector, which is the primary user of the RFO fuel. With the supply of

natural gas becoming increasingly unreliable, and the ever increasing prices of the HSD (the primary

alternative), focus has been on installing RFO based plants in order to ensure a smoother flow of electric

power to the national grid. The graph below shows the consumption trends over recent years for RFO

and HSD against total national consumption of petroleum products.

3 Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2008 and OCAC 2010.

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

'00

0 b

bl/

d

Years

PPL

Dewan Petroleum

BP

Petronas

OMV

OPII

OGDC

MOL

ENI

POL

BHP

Page 34: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

34

Figure 4.2: Consumption of Furnace Oil and HSD (Million Tonnes)

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2008, OCAC Province Wise Fuel Consumption 2009

Until 1999, the government tightly controlled the oil and gas industries of Pakistan. Since then, however,

an ambitious pro-market reform program has been initiated. This includes setting up of the Regulatory

body (Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority or “OGRA”), deregulation of furnace oil price and a move

towards transparency and proposed sector reforms including privatization in order to promote

competition.

Furnace oil prices have been completely deregulated since July 2000, while the HSD market was partially

deregulated in 2002. Altogether, these two products constitute about 86 percent of the petroleum

products market). Prices are adjusted every fortnight in accordance with changes in international

market prices. The fortnightly petroleum products price revision is carried out by the Oil Companies

Advisory Committee (“OCAC”), in accordance with a government approved framework. OCAC is an

industry group with membership of five refineries, ten oil marketing companies and one pipeline

distribution company.

Sale price information for furnace oil for the period spanning from July 2007 to June 2009 is provided

below. The current price with effect from February 1st 2010 stands at 41,634 Rupees/Tonne4.

4 Sourced from: Pakistan Refinery Limited at http://www.prl.com.pk/products/

-

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

17.5

20.0

22.5

FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

Mill

ion

To

nn

es

HSD Furnace Oil Total

Page 35: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

35

Figure 4.3: Deregulated Furnace Oil Sale Price (PKR/Tonne)

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Pakistan has ten5 oil marketing companies (“OMC”s), with two largest being Pakistan State Oil and Shell

Pakistan, holding approximately 85 percent of the white oil market share. The others constitute

primarily of Admore Gas (Pvt.) Ltd, Askar Oil Services (Pvt.) Ltd, Attock Petroleum Ltd, Chevron Pakistan

Ltd and Total Parco Pakistan Ltd.

4.1.2 Gas

Natural gas meets about 50 percent of the country’s current demand for commercial energy, which at

present rate of sectoral penetration, is likely to exceed in the next five years. Pakistan has 28.90 trillion

cubic feet (“Tcf”) of proven gas reserves, and currently produces around one Tcf of natural gas per year,

all of which is consumed domestically. Natural gas producers include Pakistani companies Pakistan

Petroleum Limited (“PPL”), Oil and Gas Development Company Ltd (“OGDC”), Mari Gas Company

Limited (“MGCL”) and Dewan Petroleum among others, as well as international companies such as

Petronas, Tullow, ENI,, British Petroleum and BHP Billiton. The largest currently productive fields are Sui

with largest original recoverable reserves of 12.62 Tcf, whereas Mari and Kandanwari (with a combined

8.68 Tcf) are also among the country’s major natural gas fields.

A summary of natural gas production in Pakistan is set out in the graph below:

5 Sourced from: http://www.ocac.org.pk/members.html

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

Jul-

07

Au

g-0

7

Sep

-07

Oct

-07

No

v-0

7

Dec

-07

Jan

-08

Feb

-08

Mar

-08

Ap

r-0

8

May

-08

Jun

-08

Jul-

08

Au

g-0

8

Sep

-08

Oct

-08

No

v-0

8

Dec

-08

Jan

-09

Feb

-09

Mar

-09

Ap

r-0

9

May

-09

Jun

-09

Ru

pe

es/

Ton

ne

Total Price

Page 36: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

36

Figure 4.4: Natural Gas Production (MMCF)

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Distribution and retail supply services are provided by the predominately government owned businesses

of Sui Southern Gas Company (“SSGC”) and Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (“SNGPL”). The two

companies own 3200 km and 7347 km of transmission system, respectively and there is one major

interconnected network providing gas, owned and operated by the two Suis. Both organisations

transport gas to and distribute gas within, separate geographic regions and hence there is no

competition between the two Suis. In addition, the Mari Gas Company also provides a limited system.

Given the huge pressure on demand for natural gas, estimates indicate demand to rise substantially in

the next few years. An estimated 53 percent demand growth is expected to be recorded over the period

spanning from 2009-2019, which would require imports from regional natural gas giants such as Central

Asian States, Iran and Gulf states. We understand that SNGPL and SSGC have refused to commit gas

supplies beyond five years in view of the non-availability of gas. In order to preempt a potential crisis

the government has decided to temporarily suspend accepting raw-site proposals for power plants

based on pipeline quality gas. The Private Power Infrastructure Board has so far received about 24

unsolicited proposals for gas-based power plants with a total capacity of 3,548 MW and it is expected

that only a small proportion of these July be eligible for serious government consideration.

4.1.3 Coal

Coal currently plays a minor role (7.6 percent) in Pakistan's energy mix, but with compounded growth of

about 15 percent per annum, it is expected to gain significance in the sector, quite rapidly. Estimated

reserves of coal in Pakistan are around 187 billion tonnes, with 175 billion tonnes of these reserves

being low-ash, low-sulphur lignite in Thar Desert of the Sindh province.

The majority of coal production is used in the manufacture of coal bricks, with only about 1 percent used

for power production.

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

Mill

ion

CFt

Years

BP

Tullow

PPL

POL

Petronas

PEL

OPII

OMV

OGDC

MOL

MGCL

ENI

Dewan Petroleum

BHP

Page 37: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

37

4.2 Power Sector

Historically, the power sector in Pakistan has consisted of two major state-owned utilities: Water &

Power Development Authority (“WAPDA”) powering the entire country except for the metropolitan city

of Karachi and adjacent southern areas, which are powered by Karachi Electric Supply Corporation

(“KESC”). These two utilities have operated independently of each other, except for a 220 kV double

circuit and two 132 kV links.

Following the power crisis of the 1980s and 1990s, the GoP announced certain measures to encourage

private sector participation in the power sector in anticipation of a demand supply gap. A host of policy

initiatives under the Power Sector Policies of 1994, 1998 and 2002, along with transmission and hydel

policies, liberalized the power sector to a great degree. In 1994, the power sector was opened up to

private investors through the formation of Private Power and Infrastructure Board (“PPIB”). So far PPIB

has been able to successfully commission more than 15 power plants responsible for generating 5,987

MW of electricity. These policy initiatives also allowed foreign investors greater market access and

autonomy in operations, resulting in the power sector becoming a front runner for securing FDI for

Pakistan.

4.2.1 Installed Generation Capacity

Pakistan has over 19,786 MW of installed generation capacity as of end FY2009. Thermal plants

comprise about 64 percent of this capacity, with the rest made up of hydroelectricity (about 32%) and

nuclear power (about 2%). In terms of ownership, 11,344 MW (56%) is owned by WAPDA: 1,955 MW

(9%) by KESC; 6,024 MW (30%) by IPPs and 462 MW (2%) by the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission

(“PAEC”). Approximately 95 percent of the grid system is operated by WAPDA through NTDC, and the

balance by KESC.

Largely due to foreign investments, Pakistan's total generation capacity has increased rapidly in recent

years (more than doubling since 1990). Total transmission and distribution system losses, however,

continue to be high also (around 25 percent according to some estimates), with a significant level of

power theft. Seasonal reductions affect the availability of Pakistan’s hydropower capacity.

With much of the country’s rural area lacking electrification, and less than half of the population

connected to the national grid, a significant power demand growth is expected in the long term. The

growth of power generation in recent years has come primarily from new independent power

producers, many of which have been funded by foreign investors, as well as from a few WAPDA

hydroelectric dam projects.

Reform of the power sector through restructuring and deregulation is high on the Government’s

agenda. The Government is committed to the pursuit of a far-reaching reform program to help meet the

country's future power needs.

An analysis of installed generation capacity is summarized in the following table:

Page 38: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

38

Table 4.1: Installed Generation Capacity in Pakistan

(Capacity in MW)

Year ending June 30 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

Thermal Power GENCOs 4,835 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 IPPs (connected with PEPCO system) 5,570 5,560 5,560 5,560 5,725 IPPs (connected with KESC system) 262 262 262 262 262 KESC 1,756 1,756 1,756 1,756 1,955 Total Thermal Capacity 12,423 12,785 12,785 12,785 12,842

Hydel Power WAPDA 6,464 6,444 6,444 6,444 6,444 IPPs 35 35 35 36 37 Total Hydel Capacity 6,499 6,474 6,474 6,480 6,481

Nuclear Power CHASNUPP (connected with PEPCO system) 325 325 325 325 325 KANUPP (connected with KESCL system) 137 137 137 137 137 Total Nuclear Capacity 462 462 462 462 462

Total Installed Capacity of the Country

19,384

19,450

19,420

19,420

19,786

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

4.2.2 Structure of Power Sector

Following the government’s pro-privatization stance initiated in the Power Sector Policies, WAPDA has

been restructured into four thermal generation companies, nine regional distribution companies, and a

national transmission and dispatch company. Pakistan Electric Power Company (Pvt.) Ltd (“PEPCO”) has

been created as a distinct entity within WAPDA as a holding/ managing company for the fourteen new

unbundled companies. As per policy, the Water Wing and therefore the hydroelectric capacity remains

unbundled and with WAPDA. The following table illustrates the unbundling of WAPDA into specialized

entities:

Page 39: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

39

Table 4.2: Unbundled Entities of WAPDA

Power Sub-Sectors Unbundled Power Entities

Generation Unbundled WAPDA generation companies (“GENCO”s):

1. Southern/ Jamshoro Power Generation Company (GENCO-1) 2. Central Power Generation Company Ltd. (GENCO-2) 3. Northern Power Generation Company Ltd. (GENCO-3) 4. Lakhra Power Generation Company Ltd. (GENCO-4)

Distribution Unbundled WAPDA distribution companies (“DISCO”s):

1. Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO) 2. Gujranwala Electric Power Company (GEPCO) 3. Faisalabad Electric Supply Company (FESCO) 4. Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) 5. Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) 6. Peshawar Electric Supply Company (PESCO) 7. Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) 8. Quetta Electric Supply Company (QESCO) 9. Tribal Electric Supply Company (TESCO)

Transmission 1. National Transmission and Despatch Company Ltd (“NTDC”)

4.2.3 National Transmission and Despatch Company

Incorporated in November 1998, the National

Transmission and Despatch Company (“NTDC”) was

licensed in 2002 to engage in the exclusive transmission

of electricity to the national grid for a period of 30 years.

The NTDC links the power generating units and load

centers across the entire country, as shown in the

adjacent figure. NTDC is responsible for the transmission

and interconnection facilities and for the economic

dispatch of all generation facilities connected either

directly or indirectly. NTDC system consists of a large

network of transmission lines and grid stations of voltage

capacities from 220 kV to 500 kV. The NTDC operates and

maintains nine 500 kV grid station, 4,160 km of 500 kV

transmission line and 4,000 km of 220 kV transmission

line in Pakistan. This national grid connects hydel stations

located in the North and thermal units installed mostly in

Page 40: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

40

the Central and Southern region with the load centers. Under NTDC, dispatch functions and co-

ordination of supply and operation of the system are undertaken by the National Power Control Center

(“NPCC”).

NTDC has been given the task of market and system Operator. On December 31, 2002, NTDC was

granted the transmission license by NEPRA whereby NTDC became the sole buyer of bulk power being

produced in Pakistan for a period of 30 years – for onward transmission/sale to the distribution

companies. Under the regime set out in the license, the NTDC is entrusted to act as:-

Central Power Purchasing Agency, to procure electric power in bulk from GENCOs, IPPs and other power stations on behalf of DISCOs

System Operator, to provide a secure, safe and reliable operation of distribution facilities, and control and dispatch of generation facilities

Transmission Network Operator, to conduct operation and maintenance, planning, design and expansion of the 500kV and 220kV transmission network

Contract Registrar and Power Exchange Administrator, to record and monitor contracts relating to the bilateral trading system

As per policy governing IPPs, CPPA/NTDC shall be GPL’s sole purchaser of power generated by the plant.

Figure 4.5: Structure of CPPA as Part of NTDC

Source: NTDC

Board of

Directors

Consultant CPPA Board Finance Dir. TNO/ TECH

Dir

Other Admin.

HODs

CE Coord. &

Monitoring.

Internal

Audit

GM (Sys. Op.)

NPCC

GM Services

Div.

Operational

Officer

GM P Purchase

(WPPO)

GM Power

Sale

Dy. GM

Finance

Page 41: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

41

4.3 Independent Power Producers

The burgeoning electricity demand coupled with generation capacity issues has resulted in the need for

greater private sector involvement in the country’s power sector. Around 30 percent of the cumulative

power generation of the country equating to 5,987 MW is sourced from the IPPs. Successive

governments have highlighted the importance of IPPs in the nation’s economy and through various

policy initiatives tried to attract private and foreign investors into power generation.

Resultantly there are more than 15 active IPPs currently operating in the previously largely public sector

dominated power sector. These include:

Table 4.3: Installed IPPs

Project Name Gross Capacity (MW)

1 AES Lalpir Limited 362 2 AES Pak Gen (Pvt.) Limited 365 3 Attock Gen 165 4 KAPCO 1,466 5 Fauji Kabirwala Power Company 157 6 Gul Ahmed Energy Ltd. (GAEL) 136.17 7 Habibullah Coastal Power (Pvt) Limited 129 8 Japan Power Generation (Pvt) Limited 136 9 Kohinoor Energy Limited 131.44

10 Rousch (Pakistan) Power Limited 450 11 Saba Power Company Limited 134 12 Southern Electric Power Company Limited 117 13 Tapal Energy Limited 126 14 TNB Liberty Power 235 15 Uch Power Limited 586 16 HUBCO 1,292

Total 5,987

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Furthermore, there are about 37 IPPs in the pipeline according to the PPIB, expected to come on line by

December 2017 with an additional capacity of 10,242MW. These include a host of thermal IPPs as well

hydel and alternate energy IPPs (see table on next page).

Page 42: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

42

Table 4.4: IPPs in the pipeline

Project Location Capacity (MW) Expected COD

1 AttockGen Power Morgah, Rawalpindi 156 COD (Mar 2009)

2 Atlas Power Sheikhupura 213.6 COD (Aug2009)

3 Nishat Power Lahore 195.26 COD (November 2009

4 Saif Power Sahiwal 209 Jan 2010 (NYC)*

5 Orient Power Balloki 212.7 Jan 2010 (NYC)*

6 Fauji Mari Power Daharki 176.66 Jan 2010 (NYC)*

7 Engro Power Qadirpur 216.8 Jan 2010 (NYC)*

8 Sapphire Power Muridke 209 Feb 2010 (NYC)*

9 Nishat Chunian Lahore 195.26 Mar 2010

10 HUBCO-Narowal Narowal 213.6 Mar 2010

11 Bhikki (Halmore) Power Bhikki 209 Decr 2010

12 Liberty Power Tech Faisalabad 195 Dec 2010

13 Grange Power Limited Arifwala 146.5 Dec 2011

14 Radian Power Pasrur 150 Jun 2012

15 Engro ICB Power Near Bhikki 527 Dec2012

16 Star Thermal Power Daharki 125.84 Dec 2012

17 Uch II Power Dera Murad Jamali, 375.2 Dec 2012

18 Green Power Dadu 170.95 Dec2012

19 Kandra Power Kandra near Sukkur 120 Dec 2013

20 New Bong Escape Hydel Jehlum River, Near Mangla 84 Dec 2013

21 Rajdhani Hydro Power Poonch River, Near Mangla 132 Dec 2014

22 Gulpur Hydro Power Poonch, River/Gulpur 100 Dec 2014

23 Patrind Hydropower Kunhar River 150 Dec 2014

24 Kotli Hydel Poonch River 100 Dec 2014

25 Sehra Hydel Poonch River 130 Dec 2014

26 AES Imported Coal Gadani, Karachi 1200 Jun 2015

27 Karot Hydel Jehlum River 720 Aug 2015

28 Madian Hydropower Swat River 157 Dec 2015

29 Asrit-Kedam Hydel NearKalam/SwatRiver 215 Dec2015

30 Azad Pattan Hydel Jehlum River/Sudhnoti 222 Aug 2016

31 Kalam-Asrit Hydel Swat River 197 Dec 2016

32 Shogosin Hyderopower Luthko River/Chitral 127 Dec 2016

33 Shushgai Zhendoli Hydel Turkho River/Chitral 102 Dec 2016

34 Gabral-Kalam Hydropower Gabral/Swat River 101 Dec 2016

35 Suki Kinari Hydropower Kunhar River/ Mansehra 840 Jun 2017

36 Kohala Hydropower Jehlum River/Kohala 1100 Dec 2017

37 Kaigah Hydel Kaigah/Indus River 548 Dec 2017

Total 10,242.37

* NYC-Not Yet Commissioned

Source: PPIB

Page 43: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

43

4.3.1 IPP Fast Track Initiative:

The Fast Track initiative is a policy introduced by PPIB in 2007, in view of the urgent need for generation

capacity to be installed. Under this initiative, a generation capacity of 2,225 MW is to be developed on a

fast track basis through new private sector power generation projects, on a first-come-first-serve

principle. These IPPs shall be facilitated and processed at speed by PPIB with no requirement for the

sponsors to obtain a Letter of Interest (“LOI”) or carry out the feasibility study for the proposed project.

These IPPs were initially to be completed with a COD no later than December 2010, however this

deadline has now been revised to 2012.

To be able to register under the Fast Track policy and benefit from the initiative, a potential IPP is required to observe the following guidelines:

Register under the Fast Track initiative, by depositing USD 100 with the PPIB

Submit an application containing the following details:

Proposed plant capacity with endorsement of power purchaser

Exact site finalization of the plan after endorsement of the power purchaser

Unconditional acceptance of Upfront Tariff devised by NEPRA for reciprocating engines available at NEPRA website, in case of not applying for a fresh tariff determination by NEPRA

Contact details of the contact/ focal person (address, telephone, fax, email etc)

Confirmation of availability of equipment from the proposed supplier

Consortium details (main sponsors and equity percentage of each member)

Audited Financial Statements of the sponsor(s) for the previous three (3) years

Experience of successfully commissioned power projects (either by the sponsors or by any of the Consortium members) with no less than 50 percent of the proposed project’s capacity

Technical and Financial Evaluation and approval by PPIB

PPIB’s advice to the Sponsors to approach NEPRA for tariff determination and issuance of Generation License

Submission of Application by the Sponsors to NEPRA for tariff determination and General License

NEPRA’s tariff determination and issuance of Generation License

PPIB’s letter to Sponsors for submitting Performance Guarantee at USD 5,000 per MW, and processing fee of USD 100,000

Submission of Performance Guarantee and processing fee by the Sponsors to PPIB

Issuance of Letter of Support by PPIB

Signing of PPA, FSA and IA

Financial Close by the Sponsors within nine (9) months after issuance of LOS

4.4 RPPs

The Rental Power Producer (“RPP”) initiative has also been recently launched by the PPIB for the

implementation of 1,200 MW of additional power generating capacity on a high speed basis. The intent

of this initiative has been to address the immediate shortfall of electric energy in the national grid,

which has threatened economic growth of the country. RPPs by design require around four (4) to six (6)

months of setting-up time as compared to an average of four (4) to five (5) years for IPPs, as the entire

plant (already commissioned elsewhere) is sourced directly and its power plugged onto the grid. Under

Page 44: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

44

the RPP policy instrument, government owned power generation companies or GENCOs buy the power

generated by the RPPs, who are signatories of the Rental Services Agreement on behalf of the

government. As of 2009 there exist 19 such projects, at various stages of completion, with a combined

capacity of 2,734 MW. Of these, eight (8) projects with an aggregate capacity of 1,156 MW are in a more

advanced stage of contractual commitment by the Buyer. In view of the incentives provided by GoP to

RPP sponsors, they have become controversial and their ‘fast track’ objective has been lost considerably.

4.5 Power Sector Demand vs Supply Dynamics

The exponential growth in demand for electricity due to rapid electrification of rural, urban and

industrial sectors, coupled with improving standards of living has pushed the surplus in 2004 to a major

deficit today. Over the past five years, using electricity generation as surrogate for supply, we can

estimate increase in supply at a compounded annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 1.7 percent, as can be

seen in the graph below.

Figure 4.6: Gross Generation of Electricity by Source (GWh)

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Similarly, taking electricity consumption as surrogate for Demand, we can see it growing at a CAGR of

3.5 percent over the same five year period.(see figure below)

Figure 4.7: Electricity Consumption by Province (GWh)

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

'00

0 G

Wh

Hydel (WAPDA) WAPDA KESC IPPs Nuclear

0

20

40

60

80

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

'00

0 G

Wh

Punjab Sindh NWFP Balochistan AJK

Page 45: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

45

Electricity balances for the past five years area provided below:

Figure 4.8: Electricity Balances (Public Utilities only) (GWh)

Note: The difference between Total Generation and Net Supply is auxiliary consumption

Source: Pakistan Energy Yearbook 2009

Adequate power supply is the key to achieving sustainable economic growth. Presently, the government

is committed to providing power to the entire population in the least amount of time possible. With the

growing energy demand, the country is currently facing a power shortage of approximately 2,500 to

3,000 MW. The present electricity demand-supply gap, coupled with a consistent growth in demand

clearly indicates the fundamental need for enhancing the country’s power generation capability. The

PPIB predicts that the peak demand shall outstrip expected available capacity by around 33 percent

towards the end of the projected period.

Figure 4.9: Demand and Supply Projections (MW)

Source: PPIB

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

'00

0 G

Wh

Total Generation Net Supply Consumption T&D Losses

0

10

20

30

40

50

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

'00

0 M

W

Expected Available Generation (MW) Demand (Summer Peak) (MW)

Page 46: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

46

4.5.1 Demand Patterns

Seasonality and Time-of-Day

The electric load varies in Pakistan during summer and winter seasons (as may also be seen in the graph

above). During the summer, inductive load increases due to air conditioning and other motor operated

appliances such as fans, while in the winter, the resistive load increases due to electric heaters. The peak

load hours in Pakistan are generally between 4pm and 9pm. This load decreases to its minimum

between midnight and 5am. Load shedding has been a consistent feature of the demand supply

scenario. This is expected to continue to be a control mechanism as generation continues to lag behind

demand.

4.5.2 Sector Demand

Domestic sector is the most significant in terms of electricity consumption with a 45 percent share,

followed by industrial (27%) and agriculture (12%). The consumption composition has only slightly

changed over the past five years, with domestic sector’s share increasing at the expense of agriculture.

Figure 4.10: Electricity Consumption by Sector and Region

Source: Energy Yearbook 2009

4.5.3 Regional Demand

In terms of regional share, the province of Punjab is by far the largest consumer of electric power with

about 60 percent, followed by Sindh at 20 percent and the rest shared among NWFP, Balochistan and

Azad Jammu and Kashmir (“AJK”). In FY2008, 45,040 GWh of power were consumed by Punjab

accounting for about 61 percent of the total consumption of electricity distributed through WAPDA.

Domestic46%

Commercial7%

Industrial27%

Agriculture13%

Street Light1%

Bulk Supplies

6%

Punjab62%

Sindh20%

NWFP11%

Balochistan 6%

AJK1%

Page 47: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

47

5 POWER SECTOR REGULATION

5.1 Regulatory Framework

The regulation of the electricity sector is governed by the NEPRA Act 1997 which replaced the provisions

of the Electricity Act, 1910 relating to regulation of the electricity sector.

National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (“NEPRA”) was constituted under the NEPRA Act as an

independent regulatory authority for regulating the provision of electric power services. It is exclusively

empowered to regulate the generation, distribution and transmission of electrical power in Pakistan and

to determine the tariff, rates, charges and other terms and conditions for provision of electrical power

services.

The NEPRA Act and related Rules provide for the issuance of separate generation, transmission and

distribution licenses and set out procedures for the establishment of tariffs. However, as an exception,

NEPRA is specifically empowered to grant licenses for the generation, distribution and transmission of

electrical power to the same licensee for the territory served by KESC at the time of enactment of the

NEPRA Act.

NEPRA is currently in the process of defining and implementing a framework for regulation and a plan

for transition to greater market liberalisation of the sector.

5.2 Provincial Representation at NEPRA

NEPRA consists of a Chairman and four members who are appointed by GoP. The members are

recommended by and represent the four provinces of Pakistan. The Authority is supported by both

professional and administrative staff.

The provincial representation, inter alia, addresses the rights granted under the Constitution for the

Governments of the four Provinces to determine the tariffs for distribution of electricity within that

Province, a right which has not otherwise been exercised. Further to this, the Supreme Court has held

that provincial governments can only set distribution tariffs, if they purchase power in bulk or construct

power houses or grid stations or lay down transmission lines for use within the province.

5.3 Institutional Framework

The following diagram summarizes the interrelationship between the power sector, GoP, NEPRA and

other entities involved in establishing and executing power sector policy in Pakistan.

Page 48: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

48

Figure 5.1: Power Sector Institutional Framework

5.4 NEPRA’s Role and Responsibilities

NEPRA has exclusive responsibility for regulating the provision of electric power services in Pakistan. It is

required to prescribe performance standards for generation, transmission and distribution companies in

order to encourage safe, efficient and reliable service. NEPRA’s has a number of roles including:

Granting licenses for the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power;

Determination of tariffs, rates, charges and other terms and conditions for the supply of electric power services by generation, transmission and distribution companies;

Encouraging uniform industry standards and codes of conduct for generation, transmission and distribution companies;

Prescription of procedures and standards for investment programmes by generation, transmission and distribution companies;

Prescription and enforcement of performance standards for generation, transmission and distribution companies;

Review of the organisational affairs of generation, transmission and distribution companies to avoid any adverse effect on the operation of electric power services and for the continuous and efficient supply of these services;

Investment facilitation

Investment review

Licensing, Tariffs

Tariff advisory

Regulatory guidelines

Federal Government Provincial Governments and AJK

Ministry of Water & Power

Cabinet Division

Provincial representatio

n

NEPRA PPIB

Provincial Private Power Cells

Policy and legislative

framework

WAPDA (and successors)

KESC

IPPs

Power Sector

Tariff Advisor

Page 49: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

49

Establishment of a uniform system of accounts for generation, transmission and distribution companies;

Prescription of fees including those for the granting and renewal of licenses;

Prescription of fines for contravention of the NEPRA Act;

Submission of reports to GoP in respect of the activities of the generation, transmission and distribution companies;

Provision of advice to public sector projects; and

Performance of any other function which is incidental or consequential to any of the aforementioned functions.

5.5 Licenses

Under the NEPRA Act, NEPRA is responsible for the granting of generation, distribution and transmission

licenses. The term of a generation license is determined by reference to the expected useful life of the

Sets comprising the plant in question.

In the event of a licensee’s consistent failure to comply with license conditions of its license, NEPRA

may, with due notice, suspend or revoke the license. Rule 8 of the NEPRA Licensing (Generation) Rules –

2000, specifies events which can lead to the revocation of a license. Where NEPRA has revoked a license

it may:

Permit the licensee to continue operating, subject to terms and conditions specified by NEPRA;

Contract with a third party to take over operation of the facilities; or

Appoint an administrator to take over operation of the facilities.

GPC was granted a Generation License on July 8, 2009 by NEPRA to engage in the generation business

for a term expiring on December 30, 2035.

5.6 Tariffs

Under the NEPRA Act, NEPRA is responsible for the determination of tariffs. Changes to tariffs are

notified by GoP, based on determinations by NEPRA.

NEPRA’s Tariff Standards and Procedures Rules, 1998 (the “Tariff Rules”) specify the standards by which

tariffs should generally be determined and the procedures for the submission and adjudication of tariff

petitions.

The procedure set out in the Tariff Rules requires the submission of a petition to NEPRA for

determination of a new or revised tariff by, or on behalf of, the relevant utility. After the filing of

pleadings, NEPRA examines these and determines whether a hearing is required to arrive at a just and

informed decision. Where a hearing is to be held, NEPRA adjudicates upon the tariff petition after

Page 50: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

50

hearing all parties interested or affected by the petition, which have been permitted by NEPRA to take

part in the proceedings.

NEPRA is required to decide a petition within six months of it being filed. NEPRA is required to intimate

its final order (on the tariff, charges and other terms and conditions) to the Federal Government for

notification in the Official Gazette no later than three days from the date of such order.

A tariff determined by NEPRA does not become effective until such time as it is notified in the Official

Gazette by the Federal Government. Under the NEPRA Act, the Federal Government may within fifteen

days of receipt of such intimation from NEPRA require it to reconsider its determination of the tariff,

charges or other terms and conditions. NEPRA then has a further fifteen days to reconsider and, as

appropriate, revise its determination and to intimate its new determination to the Federal Government.

Once the tariff, charges or other terms and conditions have been determined by NEPRA and notified by

the Federal Government, these can be reviewed by NEPRA either on its own motion or pursuant to a

petition of any licensee, consumer or person interested in the tariff.

5.7 Transition to Competition

NEPRA is currently refining the plan for transition of the power sector to a competitive national power

market. As an initial phase, the ‘single buyer plus’ model has been established whereby NTDC functions

as the sole purchaser of all electricity generated by the power producers, and meets the power sector’s

dispatch, system security and supply balance needs. Large, bulk consumers (with peak demands

exceeding 1 MW) have the ability to contract directly with generators. The introduction of a wholesale

market is envisaged for mid-2012.

Page 51: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

51

6. THE PROJECT

The following diagram summarizes the Project and its various commercial dimensions.

Figure 6.1: The Project

6.1 Grange Power Limited

Grange Power Limited (“GPL” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Pakistan as a public limited

company under the Companies Ordinance 1984, on March 25, 2008 (Certificate of Incorporation No.

0064883.) The certificate for commencement of business was issued on May 13, 2008.

GPL applied to NEPRA for a generation license on December 16, 2008 and was granted one after due

process on July 8, 2009 for a period expiring on December 30, 2035.

6.2 Objective of the Company

The purpose of the Company is to build, own and operate a modern power generation plant, for onward

sale and supply of electricity to the National Transmission & Despatch Company. This includes all acts

directly or indirectly related or incidental to running the affairs of the Company.

NTDC (CPPA)

Single Buyer

75% Debt 25% Equity

Foreign Banks and Institutions

Local Banks (Arif Habib Syndicate)

GHG (96%)

Other Shareholders (4%)

Scott Wilson

EPC Project Managers

CMEC (with CERIECO)

EPC Contractors

KPS

O&M Contractors

PSO

Fuel Supplier

GoP Guarantee

under IA

Electric Power

Grange Power Ltd

Page 52: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

52

6.3 The Project

The Project is a brand new dual-fired Combined Cycle

power generation plant, having a gross capacity (at ISO

conditions) of 163.353 MW. The primary fuel for the

power plant is Residual Fuel Oil with High Speed Diesel

as the back-up fuel.

6.4 Plant Site

The Project is based in Arifwala, in the Punjab province

of Pakistan. The site for the power plant is spread over a

vast area of 30 acres located at Kamair at 15-km

Arifwala-Sahiwal Road, in Tehsil and District Pakpattan.

The site was allocated by NTDC to GPL in May 2008 after

ensuring the suitability of the site for the proposed IPP.

Joint visits have been carried out by PPIB and NTDC teams and load flow studies carried out to ascertain

the technical viability of the location and its vicinity to a 132 kV grid station, as per system requirements.

The area has the necessary infrastructure in place and is easily accessible through a newly constructed

metal road. Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) studies have also been conducted by Pakistan

Engineering Services and the Project has been found to be in compliance with the National

Environmental Quality Standards (“NEQS”). The report has been filed with the Environmental Protection

Department, Government of Punjab, and an NOC expected shortly.

The allocated land was acquired by GPL at the cost of PKR 675,000 per acre, or a total of PKR 20.25

million (equivalent to approximately USD 247 million), and was duly transferred to GPL on August 7,

2009. Topographical survey of the area has been carried out by Berkeley Associates, a well known

consulting engineering firm based in Lahore providing geotechnical, and site evaluation services. A

geotechnical investigation, site clearing and preliminary grading have also been carried out.

Page 53: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

53

Figure 6.2: GPL’s Topography

6.5 Plant Capacity

The gross capacity of the plant under ISO conditions is 163.353 MW, whereas under mean conditions at

site it is estimated at 152 MW. Dependable net capacity under site conditions is estimated at 146.5 MW,

as explained in the table below. Total gross generation at 60 percent plant factor is determined to be

about 799 GWh per annum, with net annual dispatch of 770 GWh.

Table 6.1: Plant Capacity and Generation

Capacity Gas Turbine at ISO conditions 109.00 MW Steam Turbine at ISO conditions 54.353 MW Estimated Name Plate Capacity at ISO conditions 163.353 MW Percentage Auxiliary Consumption 3.62% Unit Auxiliary Consumption 5.50 Capacity/ Plant Factor 60% De-rating Due to Site Conditions (atmospheric correction) 6.95%

Power Generation Gross Capacity After Aging at Site 152.00 MW Dependable / Net Sent Out Capacity 146.50 MW Gross Annual Generation at 60% Plant Factor 798.91 GWh Net Annual Dispatch 770.00 GWh

It is possible to increase the capacity of the plant up to 180 MW if run on gas. The project was initially

envisioned to be gas-fired but had to be changed to RFO due to gas shortage. In such future instance if

gas becomes available for the Project, the plant may be switched over to gas at no major cost.

Page 54: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

54

6.6 Engineering Procurement & Construction Agreement

In November 2008, the Company signed a turnkey Engineering Procurement & Construction (“EPC”)

Agreement with China National Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corporation (“CMEC”) as the

Lead Engineering and Procurement (“E&P”) Contractor, and its subsidiary China East Resource Import &

Export Corporation (“CERIECO”) as the Construction Contractor (both collectively, the “Contractors”). A

comprehensive EPC contract is expected to be finalized and signed by April 2010.

This tripartite agreement is based on a turnkey arrangement whereby the entire design, procurement,

engineering, manufacturing, transportation to site, erection, construction, installation, commissioning

and performance testing of all plant and equipment shall be the responsibility of the two contractors,

according to the scope of work agreed in the EPC Agreement and further elaborated in the E&P Contract

and Construction Contract to be signed by the Company with CMEC and CERIECO, respectively.

6.6.1 Layout Plant and Buildings

A layout plan for the Project has been prepared by CMEC as provided below, with the list of buildings

and structures planned to be constructed at site, in Table 6.2.

Figure 6.3: GPL Plant Layout

Page 55: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

55

Table 6.2: List of Buildings and Structures for the Power Project

1 Heat Recovery Steam Generator 15 Oily Waste Water Treatment House 2 Gas Turbine 16 Auxiliary Boiler 3 Steam Turbine Hall 17 General Water Pump House 4 Auxiliary Building 18 General Water Basin 5 Cooling Basin 19 Industry Waste Water Treatment Station 6 Main Transformer for Gas Turbine 20 Domestic Waste Water Treatment Station 7 Main Transformer for Steam Turbine 21 Domestic Water Pump House 8 Auxiliary Transformer 22 Drainage Water Pump House 9 Station Transformer 23 Acid and Alkaline Storage Area 10 132kv Switch Yard 24 Chemical Tank 11 132kv Substation Control Building 25 Chemical Water Treatment Building 12 Emergency Oil Pit for Transformer 26 Cooling Tower 13 Oil Tank 27 Work Shop 14 Fuel Oil Treatment Plant 28 Ware House

* GPL has acquired sufficient land for the Project to accommodate capacity expansion up to 325 MW

6.6.2 Machinery and Suppliers

As per the EPC Agreement, brand new plant and machinery for the Project shall be sourced from China

and France. Accordingly, lists of the main equipment to be used for the plant, and their agreed qualified

vendors are provided in the tables below. For each equipment listed in the two tables, the EPC

Contractor is obliged to purchase from the listed vendors. However, any other equipment not listed

therein may be procured by the Contractor as deemed appropriate.

Table 6.3: Sourcing of the Main Equipment

Machinery

Qualified Vendors

Gas Turbine GE France Gas Turbine Generator Qualified GE vendors (Elin, Alstom or Brush) Steam Turbine and Generator Nanjing Steam Turbine Co. Ltd

Harbin Steam Turbine Co. Ltd

Shangai Steam Turbine Co. Ltd

Heat Recovery Steam Generator Hangzhou Boiler Group Co. Ltd

No. 703 Design Institute of CSIC

Page 56: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

56

List of the agreed qualified vendors for the balance of plant (“BOP”) equipment is provided below:

Table 6.4: Sourcing of BOP Equipment

Machinery

Qualified Vendors

Gas Generator Circuit Breaker ABB, Siemens, Areva

132kV Circuit Breaker Xian H.V. Switchgear Co. Ltd

Pingdingshan H.V. Switchgear Co. Ltd

ABB China

Siemens China

Step-Up Transformers TBEA Hengyang (or Shenyang) Transformer Works

Liaoning EFACEC Electric Equipment Co. Ltd

Xi Dian Changzhou Transformer Co Ltd

Xi’an Transformer Co Ltd

Distributed Control System GE Xinhua China

ABB China

Yokogawa Xiyi Co China

Black Start & Emergency Diesel Generator

Cummins China

Guangzhou Diesel Engine Co. Ltd

Jinan Diesel Engine Co. Ltd

Fujian Fufa Power Generating Equipment Co. Ltd.

Boiler Feed Pumps KSB Shangai

Sulzer Dalian

China State Grid Zhengzou Power Equipment Co Ltd

Shenyang Pump Co. Ltd.

Cooling Tower Jiangsu Seagull Cooling Tower Co. Ltd.

Henan Qinling Cooling Equipment Co. Ltd

Zhejiang Lianfeng Co. Ltd

Demineralization Plant Beijing Efficiency Environmental Engineering Co. Ltd

Xi’an Chuangyuan Water Treatment Engineering Co. Ltd

Jiangsu Huaguang Water Treatment Co. Ltd

Jiangsu Bada Water Treatment Equipment Co. Ltd

Heavy Oil Treatment System Alfa Laval

West Falia

Dalian Energas

Page 57: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

57

6.6.3 EPC Timeline

Work on engineering, procurement and civil works is expected to commence in June 2010 and be

completed over a period of 26 months, with the trial run envisaged in August 2012, followed closely by

the commencement of commercial operations. As GPL is being established under the ‘Fast Track’ policy,

it shall have to be completed within the stipulated time and achieve COD by August 2012. The

construction schedule developed by CMEC is provided in figure 6.4. It is expected to formally begin in

June 2010 though some of the initial tasks listed have already been accomplished.

6.6.4 EPC Costs

The cost of plant and machinery is estimated at USD 122.38 million, with other EPC costs of USD 41.97

million, adding up to a total of USD 164.35 million. It is envisaged that out of these, USD 28 million shall

be onshore costs and the remaining USD 136.35 million imported components.

Of the total offshore EPC cost of USD 136.35, an estimated USD 40 million worth of machinery shall be

sourced from France – essentially comprising of the GE Gas Turbine 9171E from GE France. The

remaining 70 percent of the plant and equipment shall be sourced from various top vendors in China.

Page 58: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

58

Fig 6.4: EPC Timeline

Page 59: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

59

6.7 Tariff Determination

Grange Power Ltd submitted a petition to NEPRA on December 15, 2008 for determination of a 25-year

tariff for the Project. NEPRA determined the tariff (US¢ 12.4598 per kWh on a levelized basis) on June

26, 2008. A petition for review of this tariff was filed by GPL on July 7, 2009 with an appeal to NEPRA for

tariff revision. After a formal review, NEPRA determined the final tariff on December 30, 2009, raising it

to US¢ 12.4778 per kWh (on a 25-year levelized basis). The detailed tariff schedule is provided in

Appendix A: Detailed Tariff Schedule, to this Information Memorandum.

The tariff is designed to cover the projected fuel cost, variable operating and maintenance charges, fixed

operating and maintenance costs and insurance expenses while providing sufficient cashflows to service

debt and provide a return on equity of 15 percent over the project life.

The tariff determination permits GPL to generate bulk electricity for sale to Central Power Purchasing

Agency (“CPPA”) of the NTDC under the terms of a Power Purchase Agreement (“PPA”) which is

expected to be signed by June 2010. Pricing for electricity sold under the PPA, would be governed by this

determination, which allows GPL to charge the following tariff rates, subject to adjustment of capacity

purchase price on account of net dependable capacity and net thermal efficiency as determined by the

test jointly carried out by the NTDC at COD:

Table 6.5: GPL Tariff Determined by NEPRA*

Tariff Components Year 1-10 Year 11-25 Indexation

Capacity Charge (PKR/ kWh) O&M Foreign O&M Local Cost of Working Capital Insurance Debt service-Local Return on Equity ROE during Construction

0.1116 0.0840 0.1031 0.1391 2.0910 0.5129 0.0552

0.1116 0.0840 0.1031 0.1391

- 0.5129 0.0552

USD/PKR & US CPI

WPI KIBOR

USD/PKR KIBOR

USD/PKR USD/PKR

Total Capacity Charge 3.0969 1.0059

Energy Charge on Operation on RFO (PKR/ kWh) Fuel Cost Component Variable O&M

Foreign Local

5.4625

0.4691

-

5.4625

0.4691

-

Fuel Price

USD/PKR & US CPI

Levelized Tariff (at 60% Plant Factor) US¢ 12.4778/ kWh

*Tariff based on: Net Capacity 146.5 MW Reference Exchange Rate PKR 80.45/USD Reference Fuel Price (inclusive of Freight) 27,770 PKR/MT

Page 60: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

60

6.8 Tariff Structure

The tariff structure comprises of the following key components:

6.8.1 Capacity Purchase Price

The Capacity Purchase Price (“CPP”) consists of two parts:

An Escalable component, covering fixed Operating and Maintenance (“O&M”) costs (both foreign and local), insurance, equity returns and interest on working capital. The Escalable costs are indexed for inflation and foreign exchange variation, through a mechanism which seeks to provide GPL with a measure of protection against domestic and international prices due to inflation and foreign exchange movements.

A Non-Escalable component which covers costs not indexed to inflation. It is split into debt servicing of loans denominated in Pakistan Rupees as well as foreign currency, and withholding taxes.

6.8.2 Energy Purchase Price

The Energy Purchase Price (“EPP”) consists of the following:

Fuel cost which is effectively a pass through item.

Variable O&M cost which covers repairs and maintenance, oil, grease, chemicals, major overhaul costs and other miscellaneous costs. This is largely foreign currency denominated and adjusted accordingly.

The tariff also contains provisions for indexation for inflation and exchange rate adjustments which are

discussed in detail below.

6.8.3 Tariff Adjustments to CPP Components

Dependable Capacity

Both the escalable and non-escalable components of the CPP are dependent on a one-time adjustment

to reflect the difference between the dependable capacity initially set by NEPRA using a set of default

values, and the actual capacity to be determined through a dependable capacity test at commissioning.

Fixed O&M Costs

The local part of the fixed O&M component shall be adjusted by inflation (Wholesale Price Index or

“WPI”) whereas the foreign component of fixed O&M will be adjusted on account of variation in US

Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) and Dollar- Pak Rupee exchange rate. The adjustment will be quarterly and

made on July 1, October 1, January 1 and April 1, based on the latest available information with respect

to WPI notified by the Federal Bureau of Statistics (“FBS”), US CPI issued by US Bureau of Labor Statistics

and revised TT/ OD selling rates of US Dollar notified by the National Bank of Pakistan (“NBP”).

Page 61: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

61

Insurance

The insurance component will be adjusted as per actual on yearly basis. The insurance component of

tariff is capped at 1.35% of the EPC cost and shall be treated as pass through.

Returns on Equity

Return on equity (“ROE”) and return on equity during construction (“ROEDC”) will be adjusted quarterly

on the basis of variation in the PKR/USD parity.

Non-Escalable CPP components

The Non-Escalable components of the CPP include local debt servicing and cost of working capital. These

are generally linked to KIBOR and not directly indexed to inflation or foreign exchange movement.

6.8.4 Adjustments to EPP Components

Fuel Cost

The Fuel cost component has been structured such that fluctuations due to changes in set fuel prices

and fuel mix are effectively passed through. In determining the rate for the fuel component, a set of

default heat rates were assumed by NEPRA. Again, to reflect the difference between these default heat

rates and the actual heat rates, the fuel component for each unit is subject to a one-off adjustment

following a heat rate test at COD. The first adjustment in the fuel component will be made after heat

rate tests at commissioning. The revision in RFO prices shall also be made at the time.

Variable O&M Costs

This component is a foreign currency denominated charge and like the fixed O&M component adjusted

on the basis of reference US CPI as of December 2008, revised US CPI and the revised TT/ OD selling rate

of US Dollar as notified by NBP.

6.9 Taxes

GPL shall not be subject to taxation in Pakistan on its profits and gains derived from the electric power

generation, during the term of the PPA. Accordingly, there is no provision for income taxes in the tariff.

If GPC is obligated to pay any tax on the income purely generated from its operations, the exact amount

should be reimbursed by CPPA on production of original receipts.

Withholding tax on dividend is also a pass-through item just like other taxes as indicated in GoP’s

guidelines for tariff determination for new IPPs.

Page 62: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

62

6.10 Summary of Key Agreements and Contracts

6.10.1 Power Purchase Agreement

An approved standard Power Purchase Agreement draft has been provided to GPL by the PPIB. The PPA

is expected to be negotiated and signed by June 2010, between Grange Power Ltd and National

Transmission & Despatch Company Ltd (or the “Power Purchaser”), the sole purchaser of electricity

generated by GPL. One of the most important elements of the PPA is the tariff which has already been

determined by NEPRA, as discussed in detail in section 6.7. The 25-year tariff (US¢ 12.4776 per kWh,

levelized) forms the base of the PPA and allows the necessary revenue predictability and consistency

that is key to any investment.

Key features of the intended PPA are as follows:

The term of the PPA shall be in line with the tariff term determined by NEPRA, therefore 25 years.

The Company shall not, without prior written approval of the Power Purchaser, sell or deliver

electric energy produced at the plant or make available its capacity to any person other than the

Power Purchaser

From and after the COD, GPL shall make available the agreed declared available capacity, deliver and

sell the dispatched net electrical output at the interconnection points, and provide ancillary services

to the Power Purchaser.

From and after the COD, the Power Purchaser shall pay GPL for the declared available capacity, take

delivery and pay for the dispatched and delivered net electrical output

The Company will design, engineer, construct, insure, commission, operate and maintain the GPL

facility to be located on the site.

The total contract capacity is expected to be approximately 146.5 MW (equivalent to the net

generation of the plant) which would be contracted to be purchased by NTDC for the entire term of

the PPA.

The Date on which notice from the PPIB of the occurrence of financial closing is received by the

Power Purchaser, the PPA shall become effective in its entirety.

At any time after the financial close but prior to the occurrence of commercial operations date, the

company may elect to reduce the contract capacity by an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%)

in aggregate of the contract capacity, upon payment of damages.

On the Effective Date, the Company shall have delivered to the Power Purchaser the letter of credit,

and the Power Purchaser shall notify PPIB of this receipt and request PPIB to return the

performance guarantee to the Company.

If the Company’s letter of credit is not received by NTDC in the agreed time and form as reasonably

acceptable to it, the Power Purchaser may deliver written notice to the Company terminating the

PPA.

An operating committee shall be formed comprising of six (6) members and each party shall

designate three (3) members for the said committee. The committee shall develop procedures for

holding of meetings, keeping minutes of meetings and appointment and operation of sub-

Page 63: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

63

committees. The chairmanship of the committee shall rotate each six (6) months between the

parties.

GPL shall commence and proceed with the EPC works as soon as reasonably practicable following

the financial closing. The Company shall ensure that the design of EPC works shall be carried out

with all proper skill and care and in all material respects in accordance with the PPA, including the

technical specifications, the laws of Pakistan, prudent utility practices and prudent electrical

practices, so that the Project is reasonably expected to provide useful life of not less than the PPA

term.

The Company may undertake scheduled outages only according to the schedule which has been

proposed by the Company.

On or before the financial closing, the Company shall provide reasonable evidence to NTDC that the

Company has procured from a reliable supplier and transporter, through one or more commercially

reasonable fuel supply agreements, supplies of fuel and the capacity to process, transport, store and

handle fuel for use at the plant.

The company shall on the site maintain an inventory RFO of thirty (30) days at full load.

NTDC shall be responsible for the design, construction, financing, completion and commissioning of

the Power Purchaser interconnection facilities whereas GPL shall carry out the Company’s

interconnection works with proper skill and care in all material respects.

The Company shall at its own expense install the metering system and back up metering system for

determining net electrical output for the plant.

Prior to synchronization of the plant with the grid system, the independent engineer shall deliver to

the Company and the Power Purchaser the certificate of readiness for synchronization.

From and after the commercial operations date, the Power Purchaser shall pay the Company the

capacity payments for the available capacity for each month (or part-month) and energy payments

for dispatched and delivered net electrical output for the relevant month (or part-month).

If the Company is in breach of its obligations to achieve the COD by the required time, then for each

month thereafter until the COD is actually achieved, the Company shall pay the Power Purchaser as

liquidated damages an amount equal to USD 3.0 per kW of the contract capacity per month.

6.10.2 Implementation Agreement

An approved standard Implementation Agreement (“IA”) draft has been provided to GPL by the PPIB.

The IA shall be negotiated and signed between Grange Power Ltd and the President of the Islamic

Republic of Pakistan on behalf of the Government of Pakistan. The timing of the signing of the IA is

planned to coincide with the signing of the PPA, as they are both intrinsically linked. The Management

of GPL expects to sign the IA and the PPA together by June 2010.

The key features of the IA are as follows:

The term of the IA shall most likely be 25 years, in line with the tariff term determined by NEPRA

which would also be the basis for the PPA.

Within five business days of receiving the notice in writing by GPL that the financing documents

have been executed and all conditions precedent for initial availability of funds under financing

Page 64: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

64

documents have been satisfied and the delivery of the Company letter of credit in accordance with

the terms of PPA has been made, the GoP shall execute and deliver to the Company the Guarantee.

If the financial closing does not occur in accordance with the requirement of the LoS, then upon

termination of the LoS, the IA shall also terminate in its entirety.

The Company shall be responsible to design, insure, finance, acquire, construct, complete and

commission the Project, and shall own, operate and maintain the Project in accordance with all

applicable laws of Pakistan, the Company consents, the IA and the PPA

GPL shall obtain adequate water supplies for the Project at the site acquired by the Company

GPL shall make arrangements for the delivery to and receipt at port facilities in Pakistan of

equipment and materials necessary for the construction of the plant and shall make arrangements

for the transport to the site of all such equipments and materials from the port

Upon timely request of the Company, GoP shall support and use all reasonable efforts to expedite

consideration of GPL’s applications for consents and approvals to ensure smooth and efficient

operations of the Project

The Company shall provide sufficient security for the protection of the plant. The GoP may be

requested by the Company to provide additional security if required at a reasonable cost to the

Company.

The Company shall obtain and maintain insurance from financially strong and internationally

reputable insurance companies.

During the term, the Company shall not be subject to taxation in Pakistan on its profits and gains

derived from the electric power generation under the PPA.

Local investors will be taxed according to the applicable laws of Pakistan while foreign investors will

be governed by the bilateral tax treaties, if any. Where no such treaty exists with the respective

countries, foreign investor shall be taxed in accordance with the applicable laws of Pakistan.

The GoP encourages the Company to incorporate as much locally produced material, equipment and

supplies as possible for the design, construction, completion, operation and maintenance of the

Project.

GPL shall be entitled to import any plant, equipment and machinery for the Project, not locally

manufactured, prior to the COD without restriction and is exempt from sales tax but subject to

payment of applicable customs duty not to exceed 5 percent on value.

All plant and machinery imported for the complex will be cleared for release from customs and

available for removal by GPL or its agents within thirty (30) business days, following GPL’S written

notice to PPIB of a delay by the Customs in the release of such plant and machinery.

GPL shall be entitled to export any items of plant and machinery for the purpose of repair outside

Pakistan and to re-import the same upon payment of applicable Customs duties.

The exchange and transfer abroad of all foreign currency related to the Project shall be governed by

the laws of Pakistan.

Neither the GoP nor any public sector entity shall take any discriminatory action which materially

and adversely affects the Project or performance of the Company’s obligations.

The GoP ensures that neither it nor the Power Purchaser or any public sector entity will expropriate,

compulsorily acquire, nationalize, or otherwise compulsorily procure any ordinary share capital or

material assets of the Company.

Page 65: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

65

6.10.3 Fuel Supply Agreement

The Company is currently in negotiation with Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd (“PSO”), the largest state-

owned oil marketing company in Pakistan. GPL has held several discussions with various major suppliers

towards establishing a long term fuel supply contract for the power plant. The fuel is readily available

both locally as well as through importers. However, significant progress has been made in negotiations

with PSO who have submitted their final draft Fuel Supply Agreement (“FSA”) to GPL for further

discussions. The FSA is planned to be finalized and signed by June 2010, between Pakistan State Oil

Company Ltd and Grange Power Ltd.

Key features of the intended FSA are as follows:

The FSA shall cover a long term and may be valid up to thirteen (13) years after COD. The FSA may

be terminated before the expiry date or extended beyond the expiry date, as per the terms defined

therein.

GPL shall purchase all its requirements of RFO and/or HSD for the plant from PSO and PSO shall sell

to the Company all its requirements of the said fuels

Upon placement of firm order by the Company, the fuel supplier shall be obliged to deliver at site

the entire quantity of fuel subject to maximum daily quantities.

The Company shall agree to uplift a minimum quantity of fuel per year that is equivalent to 25

percent of the fuel quantity required to operate the plant at full contract capacity. Otherwise, PSO

shall be recompensed for the amount of gross margin for such fuel, based on the average margin

calculated for the year.

Fuel delivered to the Company shall meet the relevant specification as defined in the FSA. Upon

acceptance of delivery of fuel or diesel oil by GPL not meeting the relevant standards, the delivered

fuel shall be considered as meeting the relevant specifications.

The Company shall at its own cost and expense design, construct, install and maintain such facilities

as are necessary for the purpose of receiving, storing, and using fuel to be supplied by PSO. This shall

include fuel storage tanks having at least thirty (30) day capacity, a tank lorry decanting facility and

other receipt facilities capable of decanting a minimum of 2000 tonnes per day

The fuel supplier shall arrange to design, construct, install and maintain all such facilities,

equipments or arrangements as the fuel supplier deems necessary in order to be able to effect fuel

deliveries at the delivery point.

The Company shall provide at least sixty (60) days’ notice to PSO of the Initial Delivery Date. And for

future deliveries, the Company shall provide monthly and weekly requirement plans to the fuel

supplier. Parties shall consult from time to time to develop and refine requirement estimates for

subsequent months.

The Company may amend its firm order up to 20 percent of the quantities of the applicable month,

15 days before the applicable month.

The price payable by the Company for fuel shall be that set out in the High Sulphur Fuel Oil (“HSFO”)

price notification applicable on the date of the relevant invoice. Any taxes or levies payable on the

supply shall be added to the price.

The fuel supplier may increase the gross margin on the basis of a directive from the GoP or OGRA

and subject to NEPRA’s approval.

Page 66: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

66

In case of failure by the fuel supplier prior or following the COD, the fuel supplier shall indemnify the

company for any costs, damages, losses or penalties.

6.10.4 Engineering & Procurement Contract and Construction Contract

The E&P Contract with CMEC and the Construction Contract with CERIECO shall be based on the existing

tripartite agreement between GPL and the two associate companies or Contractors detailed above in

sections 6.6. The Company expects to sign these two contracts simultaneously in April 2010.

The broad scope of work agreed in the current EPC Agreement is provided below:

Owner’s Scope of Work

Site Survey

Site improvements and foundation treatment

Design and construction of non-industrial buildings and structures

The supply and erection of ventilation, air-conditioners, lighting, water supply and drainage system,

earthing for buildings and furniture

Contractors’ Scope of Work

Engineering Services: The complete design and engineering services shall be provided for supply,

construction, erection, installation and commissioning of the complete specified plant.

Civil Works: These services would include construction of building and structures, foundations for

buildings and plant, as well as building services for various structures as appropriate

Power Generating Equipments:

The GE Gas Turbine Generator Unit PG 9171E will be supplied by the Contractors. The complete

gas turbine generator package will comprise of all the required main sub systems with all

standard auxiliaries.

Steam Turbine Generator (Nanjing Steam Turbine Co Ltd, Harbin Steam Turbine Co Ltd or

Shanghai Steam Turbine Co Ltd)

Heat Recovery Steam Generator (Hangzhou Boiler Group Co Ltd or No. 703 Design Institute of

CSIC)

Cooling water system

Mechanical Systems:

Liquid Heavy Fuel Oil System

Water Supply Systems

Chemical Water Treatment System

Fire Detection and Protection Systems

Balance of Mechanical Equipment and Auxiliary Systems

Electrical Equipments:

132 kV switch yard

Black Start Diesel Generator

MV Power Distribution

Page 67: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

67

LV Power Distribution and Services

Cable Systems

Miscellaneous

Control and Instrumentation

Training: On-site training of O&M staff shall be for one month for theoretical and practical training

on all systems and plant operations (mechanical, electrical, control & instrumentation systems and

components, and Control Room.)

Tools and Spares: Complete set of special tools necessary for erection and maintenance of various

plants and equipments to be installed shall be provided by the Contractors, along with special lifting

and handling appliances and one set of commissioning spare parts

Documentation: All necessary documentation shall be provided, including six sets of O&M manuals

for all main and auxiliary equipments, complete set of hard and soft copies of As-Built Drawings and

DCS loop drawings, detailed vendor lists for major equipments, other drawings and calculations

(inputs and results), progress reports, inspection and commissioning records, and quality control

documentation.

6.10.5 Project and Construction Management Contract

GPL is in negotiation with Scott Wilson Group plc (“Scott Wilson”), the global design and engineering

consultancy firm based in UK, for providing project management services during construction. The terms

and scope of work being discussed with Scott Wilson include:

Scott Wilson, as the Project Manager, will review the EPC Contractor’s design submittals against

agreed terms of reference based on the EPC contract specifications, PPA specifications and the FSA.

The design shall be evaluated in line with international best practices.

Review and approval of the EPC Contractor’s Inspection and Test Plan will be undertaken as part of

the design submittal review.

The EPC Contractor’s commissioning plan and performance test proposals will be reviewed to assess

the effect of the commissioning and performance test plans on the plant design and construction

planning.

The project and construction management will address the following main elements:

Mobilization and commencement of the EPC contract

Contract administration including payment certification, change order review and approval,

cost management, contract close out

Progress and schedule review, monitoring and reporting

Review and monitoring of Contractor’s permit application and third party liaison

Review and monitoring of Contractor’s works quality

Review and monitoring of Contractor’s HSE procedures and compliance

Site testing and inspection witnessing and approval

Maintenance and management of punch lists and expediting close-out

Commissioning coordination, monitoring and witnessing, including mechanical completion

checks, pre-commissioning checks and commission in checks

Management and review of O&M manuals and as-built documentation development

Page 68: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

68

Monitoring and review of operator training by the Contractor

Management of plant takeover processes

6.10.6 Operation and Maintenance Contract

GPL is currently in negotiations with Korea Plant Services & Engineering Co Ltd (“KPS”) to provide

operation and maintenance services for the proposed IPP. The arrangement being discussed envisions

two contractual phases:

Phase 1 covering a pre-commencement and mobilization period of 6 months before COD. This

phase to include the setting up of the Operator on base, recruitment and training of manpower,

preparation and submission of standard operating procedures, preparing the plant for

commercial operations and ensuring a seamless transition from construction phase to

commercial operations.

Phase 2 covering the post-COD period until a mutually agreed termination date, possibly after

25 years. The Operator to provide the regular commercial operating and maintenance services

for the plant and the Owner to provide all spare parts, chemicals, fuels, lubricants and other

consumables.

6.10.7 Local Loan Agreement

GPL is at an advanced stage of negotiations with Arif Habib Bank Ltd (“AHBL”) to act as the Co-Lead

Arranger for syndicated project financing for the Company. AHBL, along with a group of other banks has

agreed in principle to act as Senior Lenders to extend the following facilities to GPL:

a syndicated Term Finance Facility (“TFF”) to arrange funding for the local component of the EPC

cost i.e. USD 28 million

a syndicated working capital facility or Running Finance Facility (“RFF”)

Standby Letter of Credit Facility (“SLCF”) for issuance of the standby letter of credit to be

provided to the Power Purchaser, under the PPA

Key features of the indicative term sheet are provided below:

The currency to be Pakistani Rupees in case of TFF and RFF; and either PKR or US Dollars in case of

SLCF.

AHBL to act as the Financial Advisor, Co-Lead Arranger, Agent Bank and Security Trustee under this

loan arrangement

The Availability Period for the TFF shall be 24 months or such other date as may be agreed in the

facility documents

Drawdown of the TFF shall be in bullets or tranches during the Availability Period, linked with EPC

payments where applicable

The tenor of the TFF shall be up to a maximum of 12 years or such other tenor as agreed in facility

documents

Page 69: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

69

Markup rate for the TFF shall be the Base Rate plus 300 basis points (“bps”) per annum; and for the

RFF it shall be Base Rate plus 200 bps per annum. The Base Rate is defined as three months Karachi

Interbank Offered Rate (“KIBOR”) which is to be reset on a quarterly basis

Principal repayment in respect of TFF to be made over up to 40 consecutive quarterly installments

with the first such installment to fall due at the end of the 27th month of the effective date or three

(3) months after COD, or as agreed in the facility documents.

Markup payments in respect of the TFF to be made on a quarterly basis, with the first payment

coinciding with the repayment of principal

Final security structure shall be finalized after due diligence.

Page 70: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

70

7. PROJECT SPONSORS AND CONTRACTORS

7.1 Ownership and Control

The total project cost for setting up the plant is estimated at USD 218.2 million, with a 75:25 debt-equity

structure. Total equity in the structure, amounting to USD 54.5 million, is held 96 percent by GHG and

the remaining four (4) percent are equally held by Albario Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd, Mr. Assad Sheikh, Mr.

Shuja Hussain and Mr. Amjad Faquir. The current equity structure of the Company is given below:

Table 7.1: Current GPL Shareholding Structure

Shareholders/ Sponsors

Shareholding No. of Shares

Grange Holdings Group 96% 421,291,825 Albario Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd 1% 4,388,457 Mr Assad Sheikh 1% 4,388,457 Mr. Shuja Hussain 1% 4,388,457 Mr. Amjad Faquir 1% 4,388,457 Total 100% 438,845,651

Profiles of these Sponsors and shareholders are provided later in this section.

7.1.1 Shareholder Control

Under Pakistan law, the level of control that can be exercised by a shareholder varies as follows:

Table 7.2: Shareholder Control

Percent of total share capital Level of Control

Greater than 25% and up to 50% Negative control: ability to block special resolutions

Greater than 50% and up to 75% Negative control + control over ordinary resolutions

Greater than 75% Control over both ordinary and special resolutions

7.1.2 Board of Directors

The general direction and administration of the affairs of GPL shall be vested in the Board of Directors,

which has the overall responsibility for the organization. The Board currently includes three (3) First

Directors of the Company as per the Company’s Memorandum of Association, namely Mr. Assad Sheikh,

Mr. Shuja Hussain and Mr. Amjad Faquir. These Directors shall hold office till the first Annual General

Page 71: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

71

Meeting. The structure, procedure for membership and terms of office of members of the Board are set

out in the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company.

The Directors elect one of their members as the Chairman of the Board for a period of three years.

Currently, the Chairman of the Board is Mr. Assad Sheikh. The first Chief Executive of the Company,

appointed as per the rules, is Mr. Shuja Hussain who shall hold office till the first Annual General

Meeting.

7.2 Shareholder Profiles

7.2.1 Mr. Assad Sheikh

Mr. Assad Sheikh is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of GPL, and a direct holder of 1 percent of

the total equity in the Project.

Mr. Sheikh has around 30 years of professional experience in a diverse portfolio of sectors. He

completed his education at Leicester University to accountancy foundation level in 1979, and then

served his articles with PAH Bromwich & Co. a Chartered Accounts firm in Leicester until 1984. He joined

Halal Meat Co Ltd in 1984 where he was appointed as the Financial Director of the company. He proved

to be a valuable member of the team, responsible for a 400 percent growth of the company during the

period 1984 to 87. In 1987, he founded a property development company registered with the National

House Building Company (“NHBC”), which by 1992 had grown into a large British company with an

impressive project portfolio of hotels, residences and commercial properties. In 1992, he relocated to

Pakistan. During the same time he also set up Rocklander Shoe Corporation.

More recently, Mr. Assad Sheikh has been involved at the founder level in establishing a group of

nursing homes and Psychiatric hospitals for the elderly – including Learning Disability Homes and

independent hospitals in UK). In the year 2000, he co-founded the Beacon Care Group of companies

responsible for providing care for people with learning disabilities.

In 2004, he became the founder Director of Mosaique Hotel SAS in 2004. Mosaique has completed the

development of a 275-room Holiday Inn in Paris, France. In April of 2005, Assad acquired Glancestyles

Holdings Ltd, a company operating in the psychiatric care sector. In 2007, a further acquisition in the

hospital sector was made whereby the Inmind Healthcare Group of companies was acquired. The

company now owns and operates 6 units and is expanding its existing facilities by way of development

substantially.

Currently, Mr. Sheikh and his family are the beneficiaries of GHG which holds these diverse investment

projects spread over UK, France, Spain, UAE and Pakistan. The GHG group was founded in 1996 by

making investments in the UK healthcare sector, after which sporadic investments followed resulting in

Page 72: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

72

a more comprehensive investment portfolio spanning five countries. He is responsible for overseeing

the financial and operational control of the businesses.

7.2.2 Mr. Shuja Hussain

Mr. Shuja Hussain is the Chief Executive of GPL, and a Director shareholder of 1 percent of the total

equity in the Project.

Mr. Shuja Hussain has 28 years of professional experience under his belt, and has held strategic

positions at various trade and manufacturing organizations. He completed his graduation from Pakistan,

before obtaining a diploma in Business Management, from IMI Cornilious Group, Anoka, USA. From

1980 to 1982, he served as the Commercial Director of Trade and Traders (Pvt.) Ltd, a large carpet

exporting company based in Pakistan. In 1982, he joined Big Mac Foods (Pvt.) Ltd, a franchise of Coca

Cola International, as Director Marketing, until 1986.

In 1986, Mr. Hussain founded a 200 MT per day Chishtian Flour Mills (Pvt.) Ltd, and remained at its helm

as the CEO, up till 1999, after which he left for UK. He established a chain of supermarkets in UK from

1999 to 2007 when his commitments back home forced him back to Pakistan, and the supermarket

chain had to be leased out.

Mr. Shuja Hussain established Arsh Gas Ltd In 2007, LPG storage and filling business with 240 tons of

LPG storage capacity, located at Mustafabad Tehsil District, Okara, Punjab. Arsh Gas has the capacity to

undertake own operations as well as be available as a common user facility for other LPG marketing

companies. As of 2008, he is in the process of setting up a 163 MW Combined Cycle power plant, as its

Chief Executive.

7.2.3 Mr. Amjad Faquir

Mr Amjad Faquir is a director of GPL and a 1 per cent shareholder in the company.

Mr Amjad Faquir completed his Business studies Diploma at Loughborough College in 1985 and then

went on to complete his Commercial Pilots Licence in 1987 in California USA. He started his professional

business career in 1988 with the development of a property healthcare portfolio located in the midlands

further developing to spread across the UK.

In 1997 Mr Faquir was Co-Founder and shareholder of Beacon care PLC, operating twenty registered

homes with the Commission for Social Care Inspection (“CSCI”).

Page 73: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

73

In 1999 Mr Faquir ventured into the hospitality sector establishing a branded hotel in the Midlands and

in 2004 Co-founded the Mosaique Hotels SAS. Mosaique has completed the development of a 275 room

Holiday Inn Hotel in Paris, France.

In April 2005 Mr Faquir acquired Glancestyles Holding Ltd, a company operating in the Independent

Hospital Sector. In 2006 Mr Faquir went on to create the Inmind brand, in which its principle activity is

to operate in secure forensic hospitals, with the acquisitions of Anwick Ltd and Inmind Ltd expanding the

hospital portfolio. In 2009 Mr Faquir secured planning to further increase the Inmind revenue by 100%.

Additional to these responsibilities Mr Faquir acts as a Healthcare Consultant proving strategic

development to a number of independent healthcare providers.

Page 74: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

74

7.2.4 Grange Holdings Group

GHG is the largest shareholder and lead sponsor of Grange Power Ltd. It currently holds 96 percent of

the total equity. A brief business profile is provided hereunder. For further details reference may be

drawn to GHG’s website (www.grangeholdings.com).

1. Business Profile

The Grange Holdings Group is an offshore company established in

2002, having investments in a diverse portfolio of sectors and

markets including property and real estate development, tourism

and hospitality, healthcare (physical and psychiatric), and social

sectors. Projects have wide geographical spread, spanning United

Kingdom, France, Spain, UAE and Pakistan.

United Kingdom

GHG has expanded its portfolio of Healthcare Assets in the UK since 1996. Its entry into the sector was through the provision of Elderly Care in the South East of England. This was followed in 2000, by investments in the niche market of Learning Disabilities for Adults. The strategy for the Group has been to be both an operator and provider of property assets. The Division has grown to own and operate 20 sites across London and the South East of England. In 2005 the Glancestyle Group of companies was acquired to further consolidate GHG’s presence in the sector. Glancestyle specializes in the provision of Psychiatric medical care and provided GHG with the opportunity of participating in this highly lucrative segment of the healthcare market. The portfolio was further enhanced in 2006 by the acquisition of the Inmind Group. This Division now owns and operates four (4) hospitals with four (4) others under development, and ongoing expansion of existing sites by adding further facilities and bedroom stock. France

In 2004, GHG added Mosaique Hotels SAS to its portfolio of Investments. Mosaique acquired and developed the first hotel in Paris, a 275 room Holiday Inn, which opened for business in 2006. The second project is the Crown Plaza with 185 rooms, which is underway on River Sein in Paris. Spain

Marbella in Spain was the location for two prestigious developments of 38 town houses in a village setting. The developments were completed in 2005.

Page 75: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

75

UAE

The Group is currently developing prestigious villas on the Emirates Hill Golf Course in Emirates Hills, the highly sought after location in Dubai for villas. Pakistan

Arsh Gas Limited in Okara is a fully integrated LPG facility providing storage and marketing operations for own as well as client LPG companies. Arsh gas has a 240 tonnes storage capacity, as well as a 2000 tonnes/day filling capacity.

GHG invested in the sugar sector in 2007 by acquiring a sugar mill in

Sindh, Kiran Sugar Mill, with a crushing capacity of 10,000 MT per

day. GHG is in the process of divesting this mill, however it still owns

80% of the company’s shares.

A 163.35 MW Combined Cycle power generation project at Arifwala,

in the province of Punjab, is also in the pipeline.

2. Financials

(based on audited

accounts as of

February 28, 2008)

Authorized Capital: USD 50,000

Paid-up Capital: USD 1

Total Asset Base: USD 95,214,208

Total Liabilities: USD 4,158,729

Net Asset Value: USD 91,055,479

Net Profit (after taxes): USD 559,080

3. Major Investments Grange Holdings Group holds investments in the following major

companies:

Note: All Market Values given have been independently evaluated by

the Cleland & Co Ltd (Chartered Accountant Group)

Eastleigh Holdings plc (100% shareholding) Eastleigh Holdings owns properties in Dubai, UAE and Marbella, Spain. It is responsible for the development of 38 town houses in Spain, and is presently involved in a villas project in the Emirates Hill Golf Course, in Dubai. *Market Value (est.): GBP 7,000,000-

10,000,000

*Note: Market Value estimates provided by Better Homes Ltd. (UAE-

Independent Realtor)

Page 76: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

76

Allegony Limited (20% shareholding) Allegony Ltd is an investment company holding shares in the hotel industry. Brompton and Mosiac Investments SAS which individually own Chazey Court, as well as the Holiday Inn Paris along with an upcoming Crown Plaza Hotel Paris are part of the Allegony Limited umbrella. *Market Value (est.): GBP 4,784,329

*Note: This market value has been sourced from Savills estate

agents.

Glancestyle Holdings Ltd (50% shareholding) Glancestyle Group of companies specializes in the provision of psychiatric hospitals. The Inmind Group is a provider of adult mental health facilities, and owns and operates two (2) open rehabilitation units, a community housing facility and an elderly nursing home. Gross Asset Valuation: GBP 65,000,000

Debt: GBP 14,000,000

Net Asset Value: GBP 51,000,000

Cayes Limited (50% shareholding) Cayes Ltd owns properties rented out to UK trading companies. These UK companies operate the properties to provide a range of adult mental health services under the brand name of Inmind. The Cayes Limited portfolio was enhanced with the inclusion of the Inmind Group in 2006. Gross Asset Valution: GBP 50,000,000

Debt: GBP 25,000,000

Net Asset Value*: GBP 25,000,000

* Following development of existing facilities expected to be

completed by 2011, the Net Asset Value will increase to GBP 35

million.

Penbridge Properties Ltd (50% shareholding)

Penbridge Properties owns a property known as the Pickeridge Estate (132 acres), was conservatively valued in the latest accounts of GHG at the value of the share capital at the time. Since the acquisition, a two-phased development of the property has commenced to provide care facilities for adults with mental health issues. *Market Value (current est.): GBP 4,000,000

*Note: This market value shall be updated to GBP 20,000,000 upon

the completion of a building complex on this piece of land.

Page 77: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

77

Beacon Care Holdings plc (37.5% shareholding)

Beacon Care Holding is a trading company and a lessee to Kerdale

and Allensbury (Kerdale and Allensbury are 50% subsidiaries of

GHG), which each own properties rented out to Beacon Care

Holdings. These properties were operated as care homes. In May

2008, almost the entire (90%) portfolio of properties was sold to the

Caretech Group, a UK plc operating in the same industry for a figure

in excess of GBP 37 million cash which is held with the firm’s legal

counsel and partly available for investment in GPL.

Gross Asset Valution: GBP 38,000,000

Debt: GBP 5,000,000

Net Asset Value: GBP 33,000,000

4. Contact Details Current business address (UK):

Ground Floor Management Training Centre

Badgemore Park Golf Club Badgemore

Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire RG9 4NR

Tel: +44 (0) 1491 576544

Fax: +44 (0) 1491 576194

Current business address (Pakistan):

2nd Floor 65-Z Commercial Area D.H.A, Lahore

Tel: +92 42 7029283, 7025282, 8320823

Fax: +92 42 5892743

Website:

www.grangeholdings.com

Page 78: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

78

7.2.5 Albario Engineering Pvt. Ltd

Albario Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd (“AEPL”) is a 1 percent shareholder in Grange Power Ltd. A brief business

profile is provided hereunder, for further details reference may be drawn to AEPL’s website

(www.aepl.com.pk).

1. Business profile AEPL is a leading engineering company based in Pakistan, and has been in operation since 1954. It specializes in:

Electromechanical Contracting

Engineering

Sourcing

Project Management

Operations & Maintenance

Services Business (to support installed base) AEPL is an award winning General Electric preferred sales representative for new unit sales as well as spare parts. The company also extends after sales support to GE’s local clientele. AEPL has executed projects and provided services in the following areas:

Power Generation

Transmission and Distribution

Electro/Mechanical Contracting

Operations and Maintenance Services

Project Sales

Engineering Consultancy Services

Sponsor/Developer

Spares and Services

2. Key projects and

achievements

Key projects undertaken by AEPL include:

Mechanical Erection, Tank Fabrication, Electrical and Instrumental Works with Commissioning of Balloki Power Project

O&M subcontractor for GEII for managing Operation and Maintenance of the 126 MW CC Habibullah Coastal Power Plant

Consultancy Services provided to AES, Tractabel, EDF, Marubeni and Hitachi

Supply of 220kV Substations at Jaranwala, Faisalabad, Gakkhar, Multan and Mardan

Supply and Installation Support of 500kV Substations at Dadu, Jamshoro and Hala Road

Supply and Installation of 2 × 110MW Units-Guddu Thermal Power Station

Supply, 2×25MW GTs - FJFC, Karachi

Supply of Power Island, 586MW Uch Power Project, Uch Sharif

Supply and Installation of 225 MW Balloki Power Project (Orient Power)

Supply and Installation of 225 MW Muridke Combined Cycle power

Page 79: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

79

plant (Saphire Power)

Erection, Installation and testing of 6×40MW Hydro Power Station at Warsak

Supply and Installation Support of 4×100MW Hydro Power Station at Mangla

Installation, Testing and Commissioning of 132kV Substation at Balloki and Muridke PS

Installation of 25 Power Transformers – 1000 kVA to 20MVA

Erection of Steel Radial Gates – Marala Barrage

Laying of H.T. Cables – Qadirabad Barrage

Upgradation of 600 MW Guddu Combined Cycle Project

Supply and Installation of 60 and 100MW Khulna Power Station-East Pakistan

Supply and Installation of 60 and 100MW Chittagong PS-East Pakistan

3. Contact details Corporate Head Office: P.O. Box 114, Rasul Building 60-Shahrah-e-Qauid-e-Azam, Lahore, Pakistan Tel: (92-42) 111-00-1954 Fax: (92-42) 6369756, 6361142 Corporate website: www.aepl.com.pk/

Page 80: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

80

7.2.6 China National Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corporation

CMEC, along with its subsidiary company CERIECO, has an EPC Agreement with Grange Power Ltd, as

detailed in section 6.10.4. A brief profile of CMEC is provided below, for further details reference may be

drawn to CMEC’s website (www.cmec.com).

1. Business profile

Established in 1978 as the first Chinese national corporation integrating

foreign trade with industry, CMEC deals principally with contracting

international engineering projects, exporting complete plants and

equipment, importing and exporting mechanical and electrical products,

and engaging in external economic and technical cooperation.

CMEC has a client network spanning 120 countries in multiple regions of

the globe, with a comprehensive distribution and services network. CMEC

has been selected as one of the top 225 International Contractors by the

renowned Engineering News Record of USA since 1996, ranking from the

106th place in 1996 to the 64th in 2003.

The company has exported complete plants and equipment to over 60

countries and regions involving projects in such diverse fields as energy,

electrical engineering, heavy duty mining equipment, general machinery,

light industry, textile industry, building materials, traffic and

transportation, communication, broadcast and television etc.

CMEC has grown and developed into a comprehensive enterprise group

having a diversified portfolio spanning into property ownerships, foreign

trade, engineering industry, and technology services.

2. Key projects CMEC has undertaken 64 power related projects (including hydro and

thermal power) involving a total of over 20,000 MW, in multiple regions

around the globe since the early 1980s. Key projects undertaken include:

1983 Guddu Thermal Power Station Unit No.4 (210MW, Oil-Fired)

1987 Jamshoro Thermal Power Station Unit No.2 & No.3 (210MW, Oil/Gas-Fired)

1987 Jamshoro Thermal Power Station Unit No.4 (210MW, Oil/Gas-Fired)

1991 Muzzaffargarh Thermal Power Station Unit No.5 & No.6 (210 MW, Oil/Gas-Fired)

1993 Muzzaffargarh Thermal Power Station Unit No.4 (320 MW, Oil/Gas-Fired)

2000 Salah-Aldeen 4×300MW (Oil/Gas Fired) Units (Iraq)

2001 Kuching Thermal Power Station Unit No.3 & No.4, Phase II (2×55MW, Coal-Fired)

Page 81: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

81

2002 Gas Turbine Power Plant (335MW) at Omotoscho, Ondo State (Nigeria)

2002 3×150MVA 132/330KV Power Substation at Omotosho, Ondo State (Nigeria)

2002 Tamil Nadu 2×200KW Hydropower Equipment (India)

2003 AL-Hiswa 1×60MW Thermal Power Station Extension Project (Turbin Island) (Yemen)

2003 Labuhan Angin 2×115MW Coal-Fired Power Station Project (CFB Boiler) (Indonesia)

2004 Garri 4#2×50MW Sponge Coke Plant Project (Sudan)

2004 Power Plant (1×135MW) (CFB Boiler), Silopi (Turkey)

2004 600KM. Roseries-Khartoum Third Transmission Line Project (Sudan)

2004 Vedanta 3×30MW Co-Generation Power Plant Construction Project (India)

2004 Priyadarshani Jurala Hydro Electric Project (6×39MW) (India)

2004 300KW Hydropower Plant (Pakistan)

2005 Vikram Cement 2×23MW Thermal Power Plant Project (India)

2005 Cujarat Cement Works 4×23MW Thermal Power Plant Project (India)

2006 Ban Coc. Hydropower Equipment (3×6MW) (Vietnam)

2009 Imboulou 4×30MW Hydropower Station (Congo)

3. Contact details Corporate Head Office:

CMEC Building,

No.178 Guang’anmenwai Street,

Xuanwu District, Beijing 100055, China

Tel: (86-10) 63474525, 63479268

Fax: (86-10) 63268192

Corporate website:

www.cmec.com

Page 82: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

82

7.3 Contractor and Consultant Profiles

7.3.1 Korea Plant Service and Engineering Co Ltd

KPS is the potential O&M Contractor with whom GPL is currently in negotiation with. A brief profile is

provided below. For further details reference may be drawn to KPS’ website (www.kps.co.kr)

1. Business profile

KPS is a Korean company specializing in operations and maintenance of electrical facilities. It has successfully executed a number of projects in more than 20 countries for over thirty years. KPS has over 4000 well trained professionals and maintenance experts Primary business areas include:

Power Plant Maintenance Service

Transmission and Substation Maintenance Service

Operations and Maintenance

Gas Turbine Component and Rotor Repair Service

Industrial Facilities Maintenance Service

2. Key projects Overseas Power Projects

O&M Projects

KPS has undertaken several O&M projects in the region with eight major

projects in Pakistan, India, Indonesia and Malaysia:

Maintenance & Overhauling Projects

KPS has carried out 17 major maintenance and overhauling projects in

Australia, Philippines, Lebanon, Indonesia, South Africa, Pakistan, Nigeria,

Sudan, Vietnam, and Thailand.

Commissioning Services and Technical Consultancy Projects

KPS has completed nine commissioning services and technical consultancy

projects in India, Brazil, Taiwan, USA, UAE, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and

Saudi Arabia.

Nuclear Power Projects

KPS has undertaken twelve nuclear power projects in Brazil, USA, China,

Belgium and Japan.

Domestic Power Projects (within Korea)

KPS has a track record of involvement in over 65,000 MW of combined

cycle, thermal, nuclear, hydroelectric, and diesel power projects across

Korea. It has provided the whole ambit of operations and maintenance

Page 83: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

83

services - including routine maintenance, overhauling, emergency

restoration, and others operational services - to an impressive list of clients

in the power sector, some of which are:

Combined Cycle Plants

Korea Western Power Company (KOWPO)

Korea Southern Power Company (KOSPO)

Korea Midland Power Company (KOMIPO)

Korea South-East Power Company (KOSEP)

Korea East-West Power Company (KEWP)

LG Power

Thermal Power Plants

Korea Midland Power Company (KOMIPO)

Korea South-East Power Company (KOSEP)

Korea East-West Power Company (KEWP)

Korea Western Power Company (KOWPO)

Korea Southern Power Company (KOSPO)

Nuclear and Hydro Power Plant

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Company (KHNP)

Korea Southern Power Company (KOSPO)

Korea Western Power Company (KOWPO)

Korea South-East Power Company (KOSEP)

Korea East-West Power Company (KEWP)

Korea Midland Power Company (KOMIPO)

Diesel Power Plants

Korea Midland Power Company (KOMIPO)

Korea South-East Power Company (KOSEP)

IPP O&M Services

Pohang Iron & Steel Company (POSCO)

GS Power (GS Group of Company)

GS EPS (GS Group of Companies

ECO Korea

SK Energy

Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI)

Transmission and Substation Services

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO)

Page 84: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

84

3. Contact details Corporate Head Office: Migeum Road 1 (Geumgok-dong) Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-726, Korea Tel: +82 31 710 4480 9 Fax: +82 31 710 4499 Corporate Website: http://www.kps.co.kr

4. Financials

(as of 2007)

Total Asset Base: (USD 529.76 M) Total Liabilities: (USD 132.06 M) Total Shareholders’ Equity: (USD 397.70 M) Net Asset Value: (USD 230.74 M) Sales: (USD 726.28 M) Profit before taxes: (USD 93.00 M)

Page 85: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

85

7.3.2 Scott Wilson

GPL is in negotiations with Scott Wilson for the provision of project and construction management services, to ensure that the EPC services are effectively carried out and efficiently concluded. A brief company profile is provided below, for further details reference may be drawn to Scott Wilson’s website (www.scottwilson.com)

1. Business profile

Scott Wilson Group plc is a global integrated design and engineering consultancy for the built and natural environments. Headquartered in the UK, the group has a worldwide network of 80 offices with over 6000 employees. Scott Wilson offers strategic consultancy and multi-disciplinary professional services in the power, railways, buildings, infrastructure, environment and natural resources sectors.

Key operational regions include the Asian-Pacific rim, UK, Continental Europe, Pakistan, India and the Middle East, with offices located in London, Hong Kong, Warsaw, New Delhi, Bahrain and Dubai.

Scott Wilson has a track record of involvement in over 100,000 MW of thermal, hydroelectric, nuclear and renewable energy projects.

2. Key projects Scott Wilson has undertaken a number of power related projects (including

hydro and thermal power) in multiple regions around the globe. Key

relevant projects undertaken include:

Ongoing Saif Power CCGT (225MW), Pakistan

Ongoing Engro Qadirpur (200MW), Pakistan

Ongoing Fujairah IWPP (2000MW,130MIGD), UAE

Ongoing Ras Laffan C IWPP (2370MW,63MIGD), Qatar

Ongoing Green Power CCGT (2×200MW), Pakistan

Ongoing HUBCO Narowal RFO based Diesel CCPP (225MW), Pakistan

Ongoing Heron CCGT Power Plant (435MW), Greece

Ongoing Techno Power Faisalabad Diesel Power Plant (150MW), Pakistan

Ongoing Engro CCPP Power Plant (200MW), Pakistan

Ongoing Shuaiba South Emergency Power Station (400MW), Kuwait

Ongoing Papalanto Power Project (335MW), Nigeria

Ongoing Taweelah ‘B’ – IWPP (2000MW), UAE

2008 Oqyana Off-shore Diesel Power Plant (100MW), Dubai

2005 Kemerton Power Plant (300MW), Australia

2005 Laverton Power Plant (300MW), Australia

2005 Kogan Creek Power Plant HAZOP Study (800MW),Australia

Page 86: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

86

2004 Cartagena CCGT Plant (1200MW), Spain

2004 Cikarang Private Plant (350MW), Indonesia

2004 Ottana Cogeneration Plant (180MW), Sardinia

2003 Power and Desalination Plant (20MW), UAE

2002 Gas Turbine – Air Inlet Cooling (180MW), Turkey

2002 San Severo CCGT Project (400MW), Italy

2002 Portogruaro CCGT Project (400MW), Italy

2002 Phu My 3 CCGT – HAZID Study (716MW), Vietnam

2002 Baglan Power Station Single Shaft CCGT (500MW) and CHP Plant (25MW), UK

2002 Az Zour South GT Power Station (1000MW), Kuwait

2001 Paper Mill Cogeneration Plant Relocation (10MW), UK

2001 Skogn CHP/CCGT Power Plant (800MW)

2001 CCGT Plant Alagoas (140MW), Brazil

2001 CCGT – Air Cooled Condenser Extension (180MW), Turkey

2001 Croydon Energy OCGT (50MW), UK

2000 Enfield Energy Center Single Shaft CCGT (400MW), UK

2000 Seabank Power CCGT Modules 1 and 2 (1155MW), UK

2000 CHP Plant (180MW), Turkey

2000 Langage CCGT Plant (800MW),UK

2000 San Lorenzo CCGT HAZOP Study (500MW), Philippines

2000 Huntstown CCGT – HAZOP Study (342MW), Republic of Ireland

3. Contact details Corporate Head Office:

Scott Wilson Group plc

6-8 Greencoat Place,

London, Postal Code SW1P1PL, UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7798 5000

Fax: +44 (0)20 7798 5001

Corporate website: www.scottwilson.com

Page 87: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

87

7.3.3 AbacusConsulting

AbacusConsulting (“Abacus”) is the firm of management consultants recently engaged by GPL as

Financial Advisors on the Project, replacing another firm hired previously. A brief corporate profile is

provided hereunder, for further details reference may be drawn to AbacusConsulting’s website

(www.abacus-global.com)

1. Business profile

Abacus was established in 1987 in Pakistan, and is today a leading provider

of management consulting services in the region. Abacus has been offering

cutting-edge business solutions helping organizations to transform their

visions into realities through a combination of latest business

methodologies and technological tools. The business value offered by the

Company has a deep scale, is industry focused and technology driven with

a world class delivery capability.

Abacus is the largest firm of management consultants in Pakistan, and one

of the largest in Southeast Asia. The company has a staff strength of more

than 2000, and a large dependable resource pool of on-call consulting staff

available on need basis. Their major strength, therefore, is the ability to

provide clients with specialist consultants having sound knowledge and

wide practical experience in the required fields.

The company has affiliations and strategic alliances with leading global

brands and service providers. As global partners, Abacus was

PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) Consulting up until 2003 when PwC was

restructured internationally and its consulting arm divested in compliance

with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The four core business verticals, namely Corporate Finance and Strategy

Consulting, Business Transformation Solutions, Information Technology

Solutions and Human Capital Solutions have been designed to address both

industry-specific and business process needs of clients.

2. Key projects Abacus has provided strategic and financial advisory to a number of

projects in the energy sector, a few of the relevant ones are provided

below:

Restructuring and privatization of Karachi Electric Supply Company for the ADB and GoP

Restructuring and Privatization of Jamshoro Power Company Ltd for the ADB and GoP

Restructuring of Gas Sector for ADB

Privatization of Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. for the GoP and ADB

Privatization of Sui Southern Gas Corporation for the GoP and ADB

Page 88: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

88

Buy-side advisory and valuation for the privatization of LPG businesses of SNGPL, SSGC and PSO, for Petrosin Products Pakistan

Buy-Side and Financial Advisory on S K Hydro Power Project, for Kuwait Privatization Projects Holding Company

Several Due Diligence exercises for the acquisition of local LPG marketing companies for SHV Energy NV

Feasibility Study for LPG Storage Terminal for SHV Energy NV

Due Diligence for a merger between Premier and Shell Pakistan

Economic Feasibility for a 116 00MW power generation project, Powergen Corporation Ltd.

Prefeasibility study for Multan Power, a 118 MW power generation project, for EuroKapital, Germany

Corporate Advice on USAID-WAPDA Power Distribution Program, Ebasco. Aepes. Iteco-Joint Venture

Buy-Side and financial advisory for privatized LPG business of PSO, for SHV Energy Pakistan

Investment Advice and Sectoral study for Gulf Pak Refinery

3. Contact details Corporate Head Office:

Abacus House,

4 Noon Avenue, Main Canal,

Lahore 54600, Pakistan

UAN: +92 111-ABACUS

Tel: +92 42 3588 4981 to 85

Fax: +92 (42) 3588 4987

Corporate website:

www.abacus-global.com

Page 89: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

89

7.3.4 Haidermota & Co.

GPL is in the process of finalizing commercial terms with Haidermota & Co., the law firm to be engaged

by GPL as Legal Council to oversee the legal and contractual issues related to the Project. For further

details reference may be drawn to Haidermota & Co’s website (www.hmco.com.pk)

1. Business profile

Haidermota & Co. was established in 1959 in Pakistan, by its senior partner,

Mr. A.M. Haidermota. The Firm’s legal expertise is widely recognized,

evidenced by the wide range of domestic and international clientele the firm

represents as well as affiliations with law firms worldwide.

Haidermota & Co. has wide experience in commercial, corporate and

financial matters. Its principal areas of expertise are privatizations,

securitizations, mergers and acquisitions, and project financing. Projects

undertaken have been in the corporate, power, oil and gas, foreign

investment, and real estate sectors. It is a specialist litigator, having

expertise in statute drafting, policy advice and regulation.

2. Key projects Haidermota & Co. has undertaken several power and energy related projects

(including hydro and thermal power) in multiple regions around Pakistan

since the first power sector policy in 1994. Key relevant projects that the

company has been involved in since then, include:

Orient Power (Net 212.7 MW)

Sapphire Power (Net 209 MW)

Foundation Power Company Limited (Net 171.483)

Attock Gen Limited (Net 156 MW)

Halmore Power (225 MW)

Kapco (Expansion 450 MW)

Liberty Power Tech Limited (Net 194.65 MW)

Atlas Power Limited (Net 213.6 MW)

Kohinoor Energy Limited (Expansion Net 143 MW)

Star Power (133 MW)

Altern Energy Limited (Expansion 29 MW)

Habibullah Coastal Power

DHA Cogen Limited

Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Ltd

HUBCO

3. Contact Details Corporate Head Office

Haidermota & Co.

Barristers at Law & Corporate Counselors

D-79, Block 5, Clifton, K.D.A. Scheme No.5

Karachi-75600.

Page 90: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

90

Tel: +92 (21) 111 520 000

+92 (21) 3587 9097 +92 (21) 3587 9373

Fax: +92 21 3586 2329

Corporate Website:

http://www.hmco.com.pk

Page 91: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

91

8 FINANCIALS

8.1 Overview

Financial projections have been prepared based on the information provided by the Management of

Grange Power Ltd and the NEPRA Tariff Determination of December 30, 2009. The costs, rates,

indexation and other assumptions approved by NEPRA have been used to make the 25-year projections,

the term duration allowed by NEPRA for GPL based on the expected life of the Project. The operational

and financial assumptions in the projections also reflect the judgment of GPL Management as well as

NEPRA standards derived from their experience of other similar generation projects in the sector.

These assumptions have been compiled into a financial model, based on a standard template generally

used by the power sector in Pakistan.

The financial projections are based on assumptions and hypotheses regarding future events; actual

results will vary from the information herein presented and the variations may be significant.

Accordingly, GPL or the Advisors express no opinion as to whether these projections will be achieved.

Prospective bidders must adopt their own opinion as to the assumptions underlying the projections, and

the reasonableness of the projections.

The projections reflect a base case scenario covering the expected life of the Project and hence the term

of the PPA of 25 years, planned to be from 2012 to 2037. Key assumptions underlying the model are

discussed below:

8.2 Tariff Determination

As mentioned above, the projections have been prepared on the basis of the revised NEPRA Tariff

Determination for GPL dated December 31, 2009. The tariff structure and its basis have been explained

in detail in section 6.8, however a summary is provided here for convenience.

According to the Tariff Determination, the Capacity Purchase Price has two components: the escalable

component (which is index linked to inflation and exchange rate parity) and a non-escalable component.

Both of these are subject to a one-off adjustment to reflect the difference between the dependable

capacity initially set by NEPRA and the actual capacity to be determined at COD.

The Energy Purchase Price for GPL also has two components: the fuel component and the variable O&M

component. Again, to reflect the difference between the default heat rates initially used by NEPRA and

the actual heat rates, the fuel component is subject to a one-off adjustment at COD.

Page 92: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

92

8.3 Technical and Operational Assumptions

The assumptions for projected capital and its expenditure plan, fuel costs, operating and maintenance

costs and indexation assumptions for GPL are detailed below:

8.3.1 Project Cost

The total Project cost of USD 218.20 million is constituted of two main components: EPC costs (about 75

percent); and miscellaneous costs:

a) Total EPC costs of USD 164.35 million include the cost of plant and machinery estimated at USD 122.38 million; and other engineering, procurement and construction costs of USD 41.97 million. EPC costs are further divisible into two parts: the content that has an offshore origin which forms almost 83 percent of the total EPC cost; and the remaining portion which is planned to be sourced locally.

b) Miscellaneous costs of USD 53.85 million include all other incidental project costs such as administrative expenses, insurance, utilities during construction, duties and taxes, service fees etc.

Project costs can be recapitulated as follows:

Table 8.1: Project Costs

Cost Component Cost (USD Million)

Percent of Total Project Cost

1a Plant and machinery 122.38 56.09 1b Other EPC costs 41.97 19.23 Total EPC Cost 164.35 75.32

Off-shore EPC component 136.35 62.49 Onshore EPC component 28 12.83

2

Miscellaneous costs

53.85

24.68

Total Project Cost

218.20

100.00

8.3.2 Capital Structure

The total project cost is estimated at USD 218.2 million, of which 25 percent or about USD 54.55 million

is planned as equity and the remaining USD 163.65 million shall be arranged as long term loan.

8.3.3 Capital Expenditure Plan

The capital expenditure plan for setting up of GPL including all EPC and other costs up to COD is

incorporated in the financial model as follows:

Page 93: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

93

Table 8.2: Capital Expenditure

PKR Million

Year ended June 30 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total

Net Investment in Project 5.083 77.414 110.195 25.503 218.195

8.3.4 Project Financing

The entire 75 percent debt portion of capital i.e. USD 163.65 million is assumed in the model to be

arranged as long-term debt, based on the following terms:

a) Tenure and Grace Period: A grace period of 3 years is assumed for the loan, after which it is

to be repaid in 40 quarterly installments, over 10 years.

b) Interest Rate: An annual interest rate of 16.23% is assumed for the loan – based on 3-

month KIBOR (13.23%) plus a spread of 3%.

c) Repayment Start: Repayment of the loan shall begin during the first year of operations.

d) Debt Service Reserve Account (“DSRA”): A DSRA has been assumed in the first year of

operations (before the end of the grace period), equivalent to an amount of one interest

and one principal payment i.e. three months of interest and the first quarterly principal

installment. This account shall be maintained for the period of the tenure of the loan.

8.3.5 Operation and Maintenance Costs:

There are two types of O&M costs: fixed O&M costs and variable O&M costs. GPL’s Management

estimates these costs as follows:

Table 8.3: Operation and Maintenance Costs

O&M Components Total

per annum

USD *

per unit

PKR*

per unit

Gross Fixed O&M –Foreign USD 1.78 million 1.0125/ kW/ month 81.46/ kW/ month Gross Fixed O&M- Local PKR 107.82 million 0.7623/ kW/ month 61.33/ kW/ month Net Fixed O&M 1.7749/ kW/ month 142.79/ kW/ month Variable O&M

USD 6.36 million

0.0058/ kWh

0.47/ kWh

* Conversion based on the reference exchange rate of PKR 80.45 per USD.

Page 94: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

94

The O&M costs are based on the estimated dependable capacity (i.e. minimum net capacity) at delivery

point under mean site conditions, of 146.5 MW. The Initial Dependable Capacity (“IDC”) tests shall be

carried out for determination of contracted capacity at the time of COD.

Variable O&M costs also take into account the availability factor assumed at 85 percent.

8.3.6 Projected Generation

The table below shows generation estimates for the plant. The gross generation estimate after

maintenance shutdowns, i.e. 727 GWh, has been used in the calculation of fuel cost.

Table 8.4: Generation Estimates

Name plate capacity at ISO conditions 163.353 MW

Derating factor based on mean site conditions 6.95% Gross capacity at site 152 MW Number of hours per year 8,760 hours Capacity/ plant factor 60% Gross annual generation before maintenance shutdown 799 GWh/ annum Lost production during annual maintenance shutdown 72 GWh/ annum Gross annual generation after maintenance shutdowns 727 GWh/ annum Auxiliary consumption 26 GWh/ annum Net billed electricity 701 GWh/ annum

8.3.7 Fuel Consumption Rate

Although GPL is a dual-fuel power plant, the primary fuel expected to be used in generation is Residual

Fuel Oil which has, therefore, been used for the financial projections. The two key factors required to

estimate the fuel consumption rate are Heat Rate of the plant and the heating value of the fuel, as

shown in the table below. The Heat Rates used are the default rates assumed by NEPRA, which shall be

adjusted at the time of COD. Whereas the standard heating value of LHV RFO is used.

Table 8.5: Fuel Consumption Rate for RFO

Estimation Heat Rate required for 1 kWh at 100% efficiency 3,413 Btu/ kWh Average plant efficiency (with RFO) 45.014% Heat Rate before degradation 7582 Btu/ kWh Degradation factor 0% Net Heat Rate 7,582 Btu/ kWh Heating value (LHV RFO) 38,555 Btu/ kg Fuel consumption rate 0.1967 kg/ kWh

Note: Btu: British thermal unit

Page 95: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

95

8.3.8 Fuel Cost

Projected fuel consumption is a function of the projected generation, the heat rates, the fuel consumed,

and the energy content of the fuel, all of which have been discussed above. The unit fuel cost is then

factored in to derive the total cost of fuel. The fuel cost is effectively a pass through item. The reference

price used in the model as cost of RFO is PKR 27,777 per kg. Cost estimates for GPL, based on the

assumptions discussed above, are provided in the following table:

Table 8.6: Fuel Cost Estimates

Total per annum

USD per unit*

PKR per unit

Fuel Cost USD 47.59 million 0.0679/ kWh 5.46/ kWh

* Conversion based on the reference exchange rate of PKR 80.45 per USD.

8.3.9 Insurance

Assumptions for insurance taken in the model are provided in the table below. Insurance cover shall

become effective date after COD. Accordingly, total sum insured amounts to USD 400 million, with an

annual insurance premium of USD 2.22 million which is 1.35 percent of the total EPC cost as per the

ceiling set by NEPRA.

8.3.10 Taxation

No income tax has been assumed in the model as GPL shall not be subject to taxation on its profits

during the term of the PPA. If GPC is obligated to pay any tax on the income purely generated from its

operations, the exact amount shall be reimbursed by the Power Purchaser. Most taxes, therefore, are

pass-through items.

Withholding tax rate assumed for the model is generally 6 percent, except for the tax on dividends

which is 7.5 percent.

8.3.11 Customs Duties

According to the IA to be signed shortly with the Government of Pakistan, GPL shall be entitled to

import plant and machinery for the Project, prior to COD, without restriction and is exempt from sales

tax but subject to payment of applicable customs duty not to exceed five percent on value. A recent

levy of an additional 1.25 percent by the Government of Sindh on imports adds to this cost. The model,

therefore, assumes a total of 6.25 percent of value as import taxes.

Page 96: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

96

8.3.12 PPA Letter of Credit

According to the PPA an unconditional, irrevocable, divisible and transferable on demand bank

guarantee in favour of the power purchaser is required to be delivered by GPL to the CPPA/NTDC. This is

referred to as the Company Letter of Credit. The rate approved by NEPRA, and used in the model, for

this Company LC is USD 27.5 per kW of the Contract Capacity. The LC is required to remain effective until

15 days after the COD, and in the model it is assumed for a period of 2.5 years, with credit commission

charges of 1.5 percent.

8.3.13 Indexation

The tariff determined by NEPRA effectively allows any significant fluctuation in input prices and/or

exchange rate variations effecting the Project’s fixed or variable costs, as pass through. So for all

practical purposes, GPL shall be compensated for variations on the cost side through its tariff. The

financial model is therefore developed on a constant cost basis, with all outcomes assumed as real. The

following table summarizes the indexation allowed by NEPRA in GPL’s tariff determination:

Table 8.7: Indexation Assumptions

Indices Rates

Reference Pak CPI/ inflation 5% Reference US CPI/ inflation 2.5375% per annum Reference Exchange Rate USD/ PKR 80.45 Reference Exchange Rate EUR/ PKR 110.00 3-month KIBOR rate 13.23% per annum 6-month KIBOR rate 13.93% per annum Premium/ spread 3% KIBOR funding for working capital 3-month KIBOR

8.4 Financial Analysis

The operating results from the financial model have been provided in Appendix B: Financial Model, of

this Information Memorandum. A summary of key findings is as follows:

The Project reflects an internal rate of return (“IRR”) of 16.24 percent, in real terms. This becomes

more attractive in view of the assured 25-year tariff and sale of capacity and generation output.

Debt-to-Equity ratio is a maximum of 64% : 36% at the end of the first year of operations, tapering

down to 0% : 100% in the 9th year - towards the end of the ten year repayment term.

In terms of ability to meet financing obligations, the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (“DSCR”) remains

at a constant of 1.34 over the debt servicing period.

Page 97: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

97

Earnings provide sufficient coverage for making interest payments, as demonstrated by the Times

Interest Earned (“TIE”) which does not drop below 1.3 at any time throughout the 25 years, with an

average of 2.02. During the first ten years, over the tenure of the loan, the average remains at 2.57.

In terms of return on equity, the tariff is built to allow GPL a ROE of 15 percent. The various

measures used in the financial model reflect these returns as: Dividend IRR of 14.88 percent, Equity

IRR of 14.53 percent and an Actual ROE of 16.61 percent.

The cumulative closing cash balances, after dividend payout and debt-servicing, remains a healthy

positive throughout the 25-year period.

The table below briefly highlights the financial results for GPL from different perspectives and under

different scenarios:

Table 8.8: Financial Analysis- Project Base Case

Financial Indicators

Project Results (Base Case) IRR 16.24% NPV at 15% (USD) 6,782,687 NPV at 13% (USD) 21,303,067 ROE (approx.) 15% Payback (based on Cumulative Net Cashflow) 6th Year Payback (based on Cumulative Discounted Net Cashflow) 12th Year Debt Service Coverage during loan period 1.34 Average Times Interest Earned 2.02 Average Times Interest Earned (EBITDA) 5.43 Average Net Margin 7.81% Equity Results (as per NEPRA) IRR 15.07% NPV at 15% (USD) 187,067 NPV at 13% (USD) 5,663,151

The full set of financial statements produced by the model showing the profit and loss, cashflow and

balance sheet positions for the company, for the 25-year project life, are attached in Appendix B:

Financial Model.

Page 98: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

98

9 RISK MITIGATION

Outlined below is an overview of potential risks that an investor may consider before making an

investment decision, along with suggestions on available mitigation measures:

Risk Level Mitigations

9.1 Cost overruns GPL may experience cost overruns and may need additional capital to meet its needs

Low The major project costs including plant and machinery and other EPC costs shall essentially be based on fixed contracts, so overruns, if any, may not have a significant impact on the project cost. That being said, the cost estimates for the project have been calculated carefully and on the basis of actual expected costs discussed with contractors, with built in contingencies. Parameters used in cost estimations are reasonably standardized in the power sector.

9.2 Fuel price and availability

A power plant is a fuel intensive project. Variation in the fuel price or availability can affect the profitability of the project, considerably

Low Under the PPA to be signed with NTDC, and the tariff determined by NEPRA, any fluctuation in the price of the fuel shall be passed on to the Power Purchaser, with no net effect on GPL’s profits. GPL is in negotiation with PSO, the largest oil marketing local company with extensive infrastructure and capacity, for a long-term [13-year] Fuel Supply Agreement that would reasonably ensure availability of required levels of fuel at all times.

9.3 Demand and off-take

The demand for electric power may decline and the generated units may not be sold. This can be a big risk for a capital intensive project of the size of GPL.

Low GPL shall be signing a 25-year Power Purchase Agreement with NTDC under which NTDC shall have access to and pay for the full Contract Capacity (i.e. the declared available capacity expected to be about 145.5 MW), for the entire agreement term. This payment shall be made irrespective of generation or sales volume. The Power Purchaser shall also be obliged to purchase the net dispatched and delivered electrical output during the period – based on its planned schedule of demand. Given the overall supply deficit situation, high demand location of GPL plant and its relatively competitive tariff rates based on RFO rather than HSD, the sale of generated units does not appear to be a problem.

Page 99: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

99

Risk Level Mitigations

9.4 Default of NTDC

The Power Purchaser may default on payments against Contracted Capacity or sold electric output.

Low GPL shall be signing a 25-year Implementation Agreement with the Government of Pakistan that guarantees irrevocably and unconditionally, all payment obligations of the Power Purchaser to GPL.

9.5 Slipping timelines PPIB has set specific timelines for Fast Track projects to achieve COD. There is a risk of unforeseen delays due to political factors; as well as on the Contractors’ side resulting in delays in the installation of the plant.

Low/ Medium

GPL expects to achieve COD by August 2012 which is in line with the stipulated deadlines. GPL is at the final stage of negotiations for a turn-key EPC contract with CMEC (and subsidiary CERIECO), who are well-renowned and experienced service providers, with extensive technical expertise in implementing similar projects in the region. A further project and construction management contract is being negotiated with Scott Wilson, another world renowned expert in the field, for a smooth and efficient implementation. These arrangements are being made to ensure an early rather than a delayed COD. Furthermore, the Contractors have guaranteed the COD, and if delayed they are obliged to pay a penalty which may be adjusted against any government penalties. In addition, we expect the PPIB timeframe to be extended further. It has been revised before by PPIB and is likely to be revised again – especially if the reasons are attributable to factors out of the investors’ control. Furthermore, we understand that the allocated capacity for Fast Track projects has still not been consumed and there are new potential entrants on the scene. Given the dire demand-supply deficit, we do not foresee the government declining such interest.

9.6 Change in assumptions for projections

The financial projections for the Company are based on various assumptions, which are subject to change with industrial, market, economic and political dynamics.

Low Power sector is one of the more regulated sectors of Pakistan with standard parameters available for estimation purposes. Confidence may further be drawn from the fact that most of the key estimates are either based on NEPRA’s calculations or approved by NEPRA in their tariff determination. Furthermore, GPL has used conservative assumptions in the model which allows room for negative dynamics.

Page 100: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

100

Risk Level Mitigations

9.7 Exchange rate risk Foreign exchange exposure may impact cost of plant and machinery as well as operational profitability

Low Capital and operational costs involving foreign currency exposure have been indexed for exchange rate fluctuation through a mechanism which seeks to provide GPL with a measure of protection against foreign exchange movements.

9.8 Performance risk The Company can be liable to losses under the performance guarantee/ Company LC under the PPA

Low GPL plans to procure state of the art plant and machinery, selected from the top global manufacturers, to be installed by the leading EPC Contractors, CMEC. GPL would have KPS, the leading Korean firm with extensive O&M experience in similar plants, as their O&M Contractors. It is unlikely that GPL shall not be able to deliver at the minimum performance level.

9.9 Regulatory risk NEPRA may introduce stringent rules and regulations to control the sector

Low The Regulators seem to be keenly approving and facilitating power projects on fast track, in order to minimize the electricity supply-demand gap. It seems unlikely that any discouraging regulations shall be placed on the sector, in the near future

9.10 Sponsors new to power sector The founder Sponsors/ Initial Shareholders of the Project are relatively new entrants into the power sector, and therefore not very familiar with the business

Low The founder Sponsors are making sure that the top contractors, engineers, operators, consultants and project managers are brought on for the Project. These leading experts shall be responsible for establishing as well as running the project profitably. Albario Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd, an Initial Shareholder, is also a leading engineering company who is an award-winning preferred GE representative in Pakistan.

9.11 Inflationary pressures The Project shall be exposed to inflation both within and outside Pakistan.

Low Fixed and variable operational costs have been indexed for inflation, to WPI for local content and to US CPI for foreign component, to be adjusted on a quarterly basis. This allows the expenses to be effectively hedged against inflationary pressures.

9.12 Interest rate fluctuation The Project is based on 75% debt which makes it sensitive to adverse movements in interest rates.

Medium GPL has assumed a healthy debt-service coverage ratio of 1.34 times, throughout the loan tenure. This coverage is considered sufficient to tackle any expected adverse interest rate movements.

Page 101: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

101

Risk Level Mitigations

9.13 Recession The economic downturn and recessionary pressures can result in diluting profits

Low Electricity has a largely inelastic demand and in the current deficit scenario, a recession is not likely to significantly impact sales or profitability.

Additionally, as mentioned above, the 25-year PPA shall entail full capacity payment over the term with dispatch priority expected for GPL’s generation output.

9.14 Force majeure The Project shall be exposed to force majeure and events out of GPL’s control such as natural disasters, political upheavals, security disturbances etc.

Low/ Medium

Whereas Force Majeure is a risk that all businesses are exposed to, GPL has taken measures against most of these events through insurance. An extensive insurance cover against business interruptions, third party liabilities, sabotage and terrorism, employee liability and other risks has been taken, with a total sum assured of USD 400 million. Other such events are also hedged through government guarantees

Page 102: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

102

APPENDIX A: DETAILED TARIFF SCHEDULE

Page 103: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

103

APPENDIX B: FINANCIAL MODEL

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED BALANCE SHEET

(USD Million) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Financial Year Ended June 30 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Fixed Assets

Capital Work-in-Progress 217

Operating Assets - 209 200 192 183 174 166 157 148 140 131

Total 217 209 200 192 183 174 166 157 148 140 131

Current Assets

Inventory & Stores, Spares and Tools - 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Advance to O&M Operator 1 - - - - - - - - - -

Accounts Receivables - 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Debt Service Reserve Account - 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Cash and Bank Balances - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

Total 1 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

Total Assets 218 230 221 213 204 195 186 178 169 160 151

Current Liabilities

Current Portion of Long Term Liabilities 7 8 10 12 14 16 19 22 26 30 -

Short Term Finances (Working Capital) - 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Accounts Payables - - - - - - - - - - -

Creditors and Other Liabilities - - - - - - - - - - -

Provision for Taxation - - - - - - - - - - -

Dividend Payable - - - - - - - - - - -

Total 7 19 21 22 24 27 30 33 37 41 11

Long Term Liabilities 156 148 138 126 113 97 78 56 30 0 0

Total Liabilities 164 167 159 149 137 124 108 89 67 41 11

Share Capital & Reserves

Issued, Subscribed and Paid-up Capital 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55

Reserves & Unappropriated Capital - 8 8 9 12 17 24 34 48 65 86

Total 55 63 63 64 67 72 79 89 102 119 141

Total Equity and Liabilities 218 230 221 213 204 195 186 178 169 160 151

Page 104: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

104

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED BALANCE SHEET

(USD Million) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Financial Year Ended June 30 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037

Fixed Assets

Capital Work-in-Progress

Operating Assets 122 114 105 96 88 79 70 62 53 44 36 27 18 10 1

Total 122 114 105 96 88 79 70 62 53 44 36 27 18 10 1

Current Assets

Inventory & Stores, Spares and Tools 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Advance to O&M Operator - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Accounts Receivables 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Debt Service Reserve Account - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Cash and Bank Balances 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 10 18 27 36 44 53

Total 14 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 14 22 30 39 47 56 65

Total Assets 136 126 118 109 100 91 83 74 67 66 66 66 66 66 66

Current Liabilities

Current Portion of Long Term Liabilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Short Term Finances (Working Capital) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Accounts Payables - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Creditors and Other Liabilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Provision for Taxation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dividend Payable - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Long Term Liabilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Liabilities 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Share Capital & Reserves

Issued, Subscribed and Paid-up Capital 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55

Reserves & Unappropriated Capital 71 61 52 43 35 26 17 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total 125 116 107 98 89 81 72 63 56 55 55 55 55 55 55

Total Equity and Liabilities 136 126 118 109 100 91 83 74 67 66 66 66 66 66 66

Page 105: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

105

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED INCOME STATEMENT

(USD Million) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Financial Year Ended June 30 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Generation (GWh)

Gross Billable Energy (GWh) 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727

Auxiliary Consumption (GWh) 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26

Net Billed Energy (GWh) 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701

Revenue (based on Calculated Tariff)

Fixed O&M - Foreign 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Fixed O&M - Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Insurance 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

ROE Accured During Construction Phase 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

ROE 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Withholding Tax 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Loan Repayment 7 8 10 12 14 16 19 22 26 30

Interest Payment on Project Loan 26 25 23 22 20 17 15 11 8 3

Interest Payment on Working Capital 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Capacity Purchase Price 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

Fuel 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48

Variable O&M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Energy Purchase Price 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52

Total Revenue 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102

Operations & Maintenance Expenditure

Fuel - Gas 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48

Variable O&M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Fixed O & M 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Total O&M Expenditure 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55

Non-Operating Expenses

Insurance 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Total Non-Operating Expenses 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

EBITDA 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Depreciation 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

EBIT 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36

Interest and Bank Charges 28 27 25 23 21 19 16 13 9 5

Taxation - - - - - - - - - -

Net Profit After Tax 8 10 11 13 15 17 20 23 27 31

Dividends - 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Page 106: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

106

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED INCOME STATEMENT

(USD Million) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Financial Year Ended June 30 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037

Generation (GWh)

Gross Billable Energy (GWh) 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727

Auxiliary Consumption (GWh) 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26

Net Billed Energy (GWh) 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701 701

Revenue (based on Calculated Tariff)

Fixed O&M - Foreign 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Fixed O&M - Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Insurance 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

ROE Accured During Construction Phase 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

ROE 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Withholding Tax 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Loan Repayment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Interest Payment on Project Loan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Interest Payment on Working Capital 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Capacity Purchase Price 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17

Fuel 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48

Variable O&M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Energy Purchase Price 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52

Total Revenue 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68

Operations & Maintenance Expenditure

Fuel - Gas 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48

Variable O&M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Fixed O & M 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Total O&M Expenditure 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55

Non-Operating Expenses

Insurance 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Total Non-Operating Expenses 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

EBITDA 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Total Depreciation 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

EBIT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Interest and Bank Charges 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Taxation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net Profit After Tax 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Dividends 16 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 2 2 1 1 1 1

Page 107: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

107

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED CASHFLOW STATEMENT

(USD Million) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Financial Year Ended June 30 2012* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Cashflow from Operating Activities

Profit Before Tax 8 10 11 13 15 17 20 23 27 31

Adjustments for Non Cash Items

Depreciation 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Cashflows before Working Capital Changes 17 18 20 21 23 26 28 32 36 40

Add Back

Financial Charges 28 27 25 23 21 19 16 13 9 5

Debt Service Reserve Account - - - - - - - - - -

Decrease/ (Increase) in Current Assets (1) (11) - - - - - - - - -

Increase/ (Decrease) in Current Liabilities - - - - - - - - - - -

Cash Generated From Operations -0.7 34 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Payments Made

Commissioning & Testing Costs - - - - - - - - - - -

Income Tax - - - - - - - - - - -

Financial Charges - 28 27 25 23 21 19 16 13 9 5

Debt Service Reserve Account - 8 (0) - - - - - - - -

Dividends - - 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Total 0 36 36 35 33 31 29 26 23 19 15

Net Cashflow from Operating Activities (1) (2) 8 10 12 14 16 19 22 26 30

Cashflow from Investing Activities

Fixed Capital Expenditure (217) - - - - - - - - - -

Net Cashflow from Investing Activities (217) - - - - - - - - - -

Cashflow from Financing Activities

Equity from Sponsors 55 - - - - - - - - - -

Loan from the Bank 164 - - - - - - - - - -

Working Capital/ (Repyment) - 11 - - - - - - - - -

Repayment of Loan - (7) (8) (10) (12) (14) (16) (19) (22) (26) (30)

Net Cashflow from Financing Activities 218 4 (8) (10) (12) (14) (16) (19) (22) (26) (30)

Net Changes in Cash & Cash Equivalents - 1 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)

Cash & Equivalents at the Beginning of Year - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Cash & Equivalents at the End of Year - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5

* Pre-commissioning period upto June 30, 2012

Page 108: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

108

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED CASHFLOW STATEMENT

(USD Million) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Financial Year Ended June 30 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037

Cashflow from Operating Activities

Profit Before Tax 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Adjustments for Non Cash Items

Depreciation 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Cashflows before Working Capital Changes 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Add Back

Financial Charges 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Debt Service Reserve Account 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Decrease/ (Increase) in Current Assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Increase/ (Decrease) in Current Liabilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Cash Generated From Operations 20 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Payments Made

Commissioning & Testing Costs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Income Tax - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Financial Charges 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Debt Service Reserve Account - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dividends 16 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 2 2 1 1 1 1

Total 18 13 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 3 3 3 3 3 3

Net Cashflow from Operating Activities 2 (1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) 2 8 8 9 9 9 9

Cashflow from Investing Activities

Fixed Capital Expenditure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net Cashflow from Investing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Cashflow from Financing Activities

Equity from Sponsors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Loan from the Bank - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Working Capital/ (Repyment) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Repayment of Loan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net Cashflow from Financing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net Changes in Cash & Cash Equivalents 2 (1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) 2 8 8 9 9 9 9

Cash & Equivalents at the Beginning of Year 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 10 18 27 36 44

Cash & Equivalents at the End of Year 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 10 18 27 36 44 53

Page 109: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

109

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Financial Year Ended June 30 2012* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

EBITDA Margin (as percent of Sales) 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44%

EBIT Margin (as percent of Sales) 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35%

Net Profit Margin 8% 9% 11% 12% 14% 17% 19% 23% 26% 31%

Debt Ratio 64% 62% 59% 55% 50% 42% 32% 18% 0% 0%

Debt-Equity Ratio 2.35 2.21 1.98 1.69 1.35 0.99 0.63 0.30 0.00 0.00

Debt Service Coverage 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34

Times Interest Earned 1.30 1.36 1.44 1.54 1.69 1.90 2.22 2.77 3.91 7.56

Times Interest Earned (EBITDA) 1.61 1.69 1.78 1.92 2.10 2.35 2.75 3.44 4.85 9.38

Current Ratio 1.10 1.02 0.94 0.86 0.78 0.71 0.63 0.57 0.50 1.90

Cummulative Yearend Cash Balances (USD Million) 1.17 1.09 1.01 0.93 0.86 0.78 0.70 0.63 0.55 0.47

Net Asset Value (USD Million) 62.85 62.58 63.77 66.67 71.57 78.83 88.85 102.10 119.14 140.63

Project Results

IRR 16.24%

NPV at 13% discount rate (USD) 21,303,067

NPV at 15% discount rate (USD) 6,782,687

Payback (years) 6

Discounted Payback (years) 12

Equity Results (NEPRA)

IRR 15.07%

NPV at 13% discount rate (USD) 5,663,151

NPV at 15% discount rate (USD) 187,067

Page 110: Grange IM v10-CDB(b)

110

GRANGE POWER LTD : PROJECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Financial Year Ended June 30 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037

EBITDA Margin (as percent of Sales) 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17%

EBIT Margin (as percent of Sales) 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%

Net Profit Margin 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

Debt Ratio 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Debt-Equity Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Debt Service Coverage N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Times Interest Earned 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66

Times Interest Earned (EBITDA) 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92

Current Ratio 1.29 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.28 2.03 2.78 3.59 4.39 5.19 5.99

Cummulative Yearend Cash Balances (USD Million) 2.19 1.02 0.94 0.87 0.79 0.71 0.64 0.56 2.12 10.22 18.33 26.98 35.63 44.28 52.93

Net Asset Value (USD Million) 125.35 115.52 106.78 98.05 89.31 80.57 71.83 63.09 55.99 55.44 54.88 54.87 54.86 54.85 54.84