grand rapids community college program review · web viewgrand rapids community college program...

Program Review

Instructional Program:Residential Construction

Document Prepared By:Duane McIntyre

Year of Review:2011 – 2012

Final draft after meeting with Fiona Hert June 6, 2012

Grand Rapids Community College Program Review

Report: Program Profile-Degree/Credential

The Program Profile

A. The Mission/Purpose

The Mission/Statement of PurposeData/Information: Enter mission statementThe Grand Rapids Community College (GRCC) Job Training Residential Construction Program overall goal is to provide students with knowledge and skills that can be used to obtain an entry level job in the construction field and/or continue their education. Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):

Student’s successfully obtaining employment in the construction field based on the skills and knowledge obtained through the course and/or enrolling in additional education.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO

B. The Faculty & StaffFull & Part Time Faculty

List the names and credentials of your full and part time faculty:

Name Highest Degree PT/FT Last, First McIntyre, Duane MA in Education FT FacultyStaffList the names and credentials of your staff:

Name Credentials Aderholdt, Joshua MA Clay, Chiquital AA Phil Greene MA Mattson, Scott MA Mosley, Tammy AA Rozek, Erin BA Waite, George BA

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):Credentials are acceptable for the requirements of GRCC.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO1. Accomplishments of Faculty

List/Describe the accomplishments of your faculty for the past year (awards, publications, curriculum development, etc):Received The GRCC Residential Construction class was awarded LEED GOLD certification for two homes built for Habitat for Humanity of Kent CountyUpdated program CARP to align with the National Center for Construction Education and Research Curriculum (NCCER)

2. Faculty Professional DevelopmentList/Describe the faculty professional development activities for the past year:

Received recertification in current code, safety and law class for the Michigan Builders licenseCertified in fall protection safety

2 Updated 1/9/11- ISIS



Received certification for attended US Green Building seminar in Chicago

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):

Current faculty meets all required skills, licenses and codes to successfully teach the program. This credential is good for three years.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO3. Number of PT/PT Faculty & % contact hours taught by each

Enter data summaryOne full time faculty teaching 40 hours per week. 34 hours are spent with the student per week, 6 hours are for prep.Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):

Due to the requirements of financial aid student’s must attend 34 hours per week so that cannot be adjusted. 6 hours leaves just enough time to fulfill the administrative duties that I must complete.


C. The Students

1. Program Enrollment2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011# % # % # % # %

Applications (Students Applied) 43 57 79 80Enrollment 25 25 30 40

Ethnicity African-American/Black 11 44% 11 44% 18 60% 22 55% Hispanic 4 16% 2 8% 4 13% 5 13% White 10 40% 11 44% 7 23% 9 23% Asian 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% American Indian 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Unspecified 0 0% 1 4% 1 3% 4 10% Age Under 20 1 4% 1 4% 1 3% 0 0% 20-24 9 36% 7 28% 2 7% 4 10% 25+ 15 60% 17 68% 27 90% 36 90% Gender Male

23 92% 24 96% 30100% 38 95%

Female 2 8% 1 4% 0 0% 2 5%Students Dropped (W) 11 44% 11 44% 18 60% 22 55%

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):Other than a possible need for more female students the class enrollment represents a diverse population. The ATD student success model for African American males will be piloted at the M-TEC in 2012-13 to provide additional support for this population.




ACTION NEEDED? YES NO2. Numbers of Graduates/Graduation Rate

See attachment 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011# % # % # % # %

Students Receiving Certificate (S) 20 80% 21 84% 26 87% 33 83% Ethnicity African-American/Black 6 30% 8 38% 14 54% 18 55% Hispanic 4 20% 2 10% 4 15% 4 12% White 10 50% 10 48% 7 27% 8 24% Unspecified 1 5% 1 4% 3 9% Age Under 20 1 5% 1 5% 1 4% 0 0 20-24 8 40% 7 33% 2 8% 3 9% 25+ 11 55% 13 62% 23 88% 30 91% Gender Male 18 90% 20 95% 26 100% 32 97% Female 2 10% 1 5% 0 0 1 3%Students Complete, but No Certificate (U) 3 100% 1 100%

Enter data summaryIn Residential Construction the average number of student’s that complete the program is 83.5% from 2007 – June 2011. The completion rate for the September 2011 class was 100%.Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):Faculty is satisfied with the program’s completion rate. The ATD student success model for African American males will be piloted at the M-TEC in 2012-13 to provide additional support for this population. Working with the womens resource center will be another partner to connect with in 2012-13 for recruiting females students.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO3. 4. Graduation Rate

Program Name Starters Grads by 2010 # Yr Grad Rate


5. Demographic Profile

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011# % # % # % # %

Ethnicity African-American/Black Hispanic White Unspecified




Age Under 20 20-24 25+ Gender Male Female


Program Content_________________________________________________________________

A. Admissions/Target Population1. Target Student Population

The Residential Construction Program targets high school students, displaced workers, adults, and veterans.

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics): Recruiting and curriculum is effective based on the target population. An increase in targeting high school graduates and females would help increase the age and gender gap.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO2. Admissions Criteria

Describe criteria for admissions and waitlist trends for the program (if any)In order for a student to enter into the Residential Construction Program they must apply for the class, obtain funding, and pass the Work Key’s test with a score of 4 or higher.

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):The implementation of the required Work Keys test to obtain enrollment in the program has caused a decline in enrollment while students entering have an increased amount of basic knowledge than past students. Review student success data after changes in 2012-13.

ACTION NEEDED? YES

B. Curriculum History1. Program/Curriculum Changes

Document the following for the last 8 years. If something does not apply, indicate N/A: New Courses-N/A New Programs-N/A New Certificates- 60 hour State of Michigan Pre-licensure Certificate, MIOSHA 10, and NCCER

Carpentry 1 and 2 New Degrees-N/A Significant modifications of any of the above N/A Closure of any of the above N/A Remediation of courses or programs as a result of Internal or external data N/A Curricular history may also include any partnership, grant, or other efforts that have significantly




impacted curriculum and how. Due to NCCER the curriculum had to be updated to align with their requirements.

Also include Advisory Board or other external recommendations that influenced curriculum change. Due to the recommendations of the Residential Construction Advisory Board MIOSHA 10 and the State of Michigan Pre-licensure Certificates were added to the curriculum.

2. External Accreditation Document the following related to external accreditation:

National Center for Construction, Education and Research (NCCER) PO Box 141104 Gainesville, FL 32614-1104

date of the most recent site visit 2011 date for the next re-accreditation 2013 number of years in the accreditation cycle 2 years

3. Distance education offerings and use of technology Document the following related to distance education offerings:Courses within the program that are offered online or in hybrid format

N/A

Names of faculty certified to teach in the distance education and hybrid formats: N/A

4. Experiential Learning Opportunities Document the following related to experiential learning opportunities

ASL courses offered within the program N/A honors courses offered within the program N/A Study Away course offered N/A Co-ops/Internships/Practical/Clinical courses offered N/A

Names of faculty certified to do ASL:

C. Curriculum Planning1. Professional Standards

Enter professional standards with which the program is or should be alignedNational Center for Construction, Education and Research (NCCER)60 hour pre-licensure requirement for the State of MichiganMIOSHA 10

Evaluation By aligning the program with these standards students have the ability to obtain a State of Michigan Builder’s License.ACTION NEEDED? YES NO

2. Institutional Learning Outcomes Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):Recent revision of the CARP includes the ILO’s in the curriculum.ACTION NEEDED? YES NO

3. General Education Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):Student’s now need to pass the Work Key’s test with a 4, ensuring they meet certain level of basic education upon entrance into the class.




ACTION NEEDED? NO4. Experiential Learning

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):70% of the class is on the job training. Students that complete the class will have built a LEED GOLD certified home from the ground up.ACTION NEEDED? YES NO

5. Distance Education Offerings Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):N/AACTION NEEDED? YES NO

6. Program Student Learning Outcomes Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):The Residential Construction program outcomes are relevant as they align with the GRCC and construction industry outcomes. The program satisfies the goals of the State of Michigan providing students the skills to obtain an entry-level job in the construction industry.ACTION NEEDED? YES NO

7. Course Sequences Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):The course sequences are obtained by using the NCCER curriculum.ACTION NEEDED? YES NO


GRCC Program Review 2011-2012 Criteria & Tactics for Review-Degree/Credential (credit)

Outcomes – Residential Construction A. Program Outcomes

1. Program Outcomes List your program outcomes

1. Obtain a GRCC Certificate in residential construction.2. Obtain employment in the residential construction industry.3. Obtain the 60 hour Michigan Builders License Certificate4. Obtain the NCCER Level I and II certificates

________________________________________________________________________Document the following related to the outcomes (if not applicable, indicate N/A):

Identify the program outcome that was assessed Describe the method of assessment used (Include who was assessed, what criteria were used,

who participated in the assessment – students and faculty) Describe the results of the assessment. Were the objectives for the outcomes met? (Include

standards against which the results were evaluated and to whom the results were communicated)

Describe what curricular or pedagogical changes, professional development were made based on the outcomes assessment. Who were the assessor(s)?

Describe the result of the changes (if known at this time)

B. Program Student Learning Outcomes

1. Program Student Learning Outcomes List your program student learning outcomes1. Build a new home by applying the entire process of residential building including blueprint reading, site layout, concrete, carpentry, door/window installation, roofing, siding, wiring, plumbing and interior finishing. ( Critical Thinking ILO)2. Demonstrate effective oral and written communication techniques ( Communications ILO)3. Demonstrate respect for diversity incorporating awareness of own biases. ( Social Responsibility ILO)4. Solve problems using critical thinking skills. ( Critical Thinking ILO)5. Calculate amount and size of materials using standard estimating practices.6. Accept responsibility for own successes and failures. ( Personal Skills ILO)7. Demonstrate environmental responsibility. ( Social Responsibility ILO)8. Work effectively as a team member. ( Personal Responsibility ILO)

Document the following related to the outcomes : Identify the program outcome that was assessed

4. Solve problems using critical thinking skills. (Critical Thinking ILO) Describe the method of assessment used (Include who was assessed, what criteria were used,

who participated in the assessment – students and faculty)Each student does a part of the layout on the house: floor, wall, ceiling or roof. Then, the

8 Updated after meeting with Fiona 6-8-2012


instructor evaluates to see if it fits, if it doesn’t the students have to do it over. It is pass or fail and has to be correct to move on to the next phase. This assessment is done during the rough-in phase of the home.

Describe the results of the assessment. Were the objectives for the outcomes met? (Include standards against which the results were evaluated and to whom the results were communicated)Student failure was determined when the final project did not meet the specified measurements industry quality and timeline. The results from the last two classes were 8 out of 20 performing correctly on the first attempt and 4 out of 8 in my current class. In looking at the pass/fail rate of the last two classes, between 40-50% pass the first time.

Describe what curricular or pedagogical changes, professional development were made based on the outcomes assessment. Who were the assessor(s)?I was not able to implement the changes described below in the second semester of 2011-12 because we did not run this program in winter 2012. I propose to implement my action plan in fall 2012 to improve the student outcomes, the instructor is going to try a practice layout after lecture and tests, but before the class goes to the work site. Each student will get a 2x4x8’ to do a wall layout. On one side, they will lay out 24” on center with 1” sheathing and a 24” wide by 36” high window at 4’ to the center of the window. A passing grade will be to meet specs that were described and industry quality standards and length of time to complete. Pass rate goal is to be better than 75%.

Describe the result of the changes (if known at this time)N/A


3. Transfer Student Success RatesDataNA

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):NA

4. Employment Rates2010-117 of 33 graduates we employed. 21%

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):The Job Training goal for job placement or continuing their education is 75%. This will be the goal for 2012-13.

Planning for the Future______________________________________________________________________________ A. Curriculum Alignment



Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):The Residential Construction program curriculum is aligned with the State of Michigan licensing requirements and industry skills standards for entry level employment. It will be a 3 to 5 year goal to offer this program for credit.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO B. Preparation for ChangeEnter DataO*NetMedian wages (2011) $19.24 hourly, $40,010 annualEmployment (2010) 1,002,000 employeesProjected growth (2010-2020) Faster than average (20% to 28%)Projected job openings (2010-2020) 408,300

EMPLOYMENT AND OUTLOOK(Michigan.gov)Nationally, there were approximately 1,284,900 Carpenters employed in 2008. Employment is expected to grow about as fast as the average for all occupations through the year 2018. Business investments in the near term will be for new equipment such as automated material handling equipment, communications and controlling equipment, robotics and computer systems and local area networks, rather than new plants or structures. For this reason more Carpenters will be employed for repair and remodeling work than in previous years. As a result of the presidential stimulus package, more carpenters in the construction industry will be needed as more funding is provided to complete more construction projects. New technology, such as prefabricated windows and doors, will reduce the need for on-site carpentry. About 32% of Carpenters are self-employed.

There are approximately 37,700 Carpenters employed in Michigan. Most work in the construction industry for general building contractors or for special trades contractors who performed part of the work. Others work for mobile home, prefabricated home, or other manufacturers performing various carpentry jobs; schools and colleges; hospitals; wholesale and retail businesses; and government employers.

Employment of Carpenters in Michigan is expected to grow about as fast as the average for all occupations through the year 2016. An average of 630 annual openings is expected, with 200 due to growth and 430 due to replacement of those who retire or leave the labor force for other reasons. Additional openings will occur as workers transfer to other jobs or occupations. In late 2009, there were 822 apprentices in training for this occupation and 701 completed their training program during the prior 12 months.

Population and business growth will lead to a demand for more houses and other structures, thus increasing the demand for Carpenters. More Carpenters also will be needed for alteration and maintenance work. However, because construction activity is sensitive to ups and downs in the economy, the number of job openings may change greatly from year to year.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO C. Collaborative VenturesDescription of Collaborative venturesThis class collaborates with Habitat for Humanity of Kent County to build LEED certified homes.

Evaluation (using criteria & tactics):The partnership is an on-going improvement process. LEED Certification is the goal for each home.A history of this partnership will be written to capture the success of the partnership with habitat.ACTION NEEDED? YES



D. Budget/ResourcesDescribe the adequacy of the budget and resources to meet the needs of the program over the next four years. Identify resources needed to support proposed program /curriculum changes.Currently our budget is $7,500. We hope it will increase slightly every year to help us keep up with

safety requirements (ex: tools).

ACTION NEEDED? NO E. Facilities & EquipmentDescribe the adequacy of the budget and resources to meet the needs of the program over the next four years. Highlight facilities needs or changes that will be necessary to support proposed program/curriculum changes.Currently we have the latest curriculum updates, including PowerPoints, tests, and textbooks. Our budget meets the needs of our updated materials.

ACTION NEEDED? YES NO F. Challenges & Barrier to Meeting Last Year’s Goals

Describe challenges and barriers to meeting last year’s goals.

Our biggest challenge is recruiting students who are diligent, responsible, and have the passion to work in the construction industry. The class this year had a 100% retention rate.

Habitat having a home each semester for us to build. We only built one LEED home this year because of down enrollment numbers.

Job Placement and tracking this outcome needs a better system. This will be developed in 2012-13.


‍

‍

‍



Program Review(Checklist)

Instructional Program:Residential Construction

Document Prepared By:Duane McIntyre



Year of Review:2011 – 2012

6-8-12



GRCC Program Review Follow-Up Action ChecklistAction

Needed?Brief Action Statement Resources Needed

Academic Year for

WorkThe Program Profile YES NOMISSION/PURPOSEProgram purpose/mission statement XProgram/course catalog descriptions XWeb Pages X http://cms.grcc.edu/job-training/

programs/construction-electrician

FACULTY/STAFF XFaculty credentialing XFaculty workload XStaff credentialing XProfessional Development XFT/Adjunct Faculty Ratios X

THE STUDENTSProgram enrollment X Enrollment low. We need to continue

advertising and target High Schools, Women’s career centers, military veterans and serious career seekers.

All JT staff 2012 - 2013

Graduation X 1. Continue Work Keys2. Target a different group of people.3. Penalties for Dropping Class at Nine Weeks.

All JT Staff 2012-2013

PT/FT Ratios X

Program Content



CURRICULUM HISTORY/PLANNINGAdmissions/Waitlist Criteria XAdmissions/Waitlist Process XCurricular structure XCurriculum/Course Revision XDistance Learning Education Offerings XDistance Learning Faculty Certification X

GRCC Program Review Follow-Up Action Checklist

Action Needed? Brief Action Statement Resources Needed

Academic Year for

WorkYes No

Experiential Learning X Maintain partnership with Habitat to provide time sensitive job site projects that teach urgency and completion of a new home.

Habitat for Humanity of Kent County

2012-2013

Academic Student Learning X Honors X Study Away X Internship/Clinical XASL Faculty Certification XAlignment with GE Dist. Req./MACRO XAlignment with External Standards XAlignment with ILOs XProgram Learning Outcomes XCourse Sequences XGeneral Education offerings XCurriculum Map development X Create a curriculum map towards credit

credentialKatie Daniels 2012-2013



Program DataPROGRAM DATAPerkins Indicators (if applicable) XTransfer Student Performance XLicensure/Certification Pass Rates X

PROGRAM OUTCOMESDevelopment/revision of program outcomes

x Placement of students in employment or continued education

All JT team 2012-13

PROGRAM STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

X

GRCC Program Review Follow-Up Action Checklist

Action Needed? Brief Action Statement Resources Needed

Academic Year for

WorkYes No

Program Learning Outcomes revision XIdentification of Direct/Indirect Measures of Program Learning Outcomes

X

Using data to Improve Curriculum X

NEEDS ANALYSIS/FUTURE DIRECTIONJob/wage viability XAccounting for industry changes XChange Management XTransfer Partnerships XArticulation Agreements X Contact Michigan universities to identify

opportunities for student articulation.Administrative help 2012-2014

Course Equivalencies XAdvisory Board X



Collaboration with External Partners X Work with Habitat and others to provide work site training.

2012-2013

Program Resources XFacilities/Equipment x None at this time. On going

OTHER


grand rapids community college program review · web viewgrand rapids community college program...

Documents