gov.uscourts.mdd.176071.46.0

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHAMBERS OF WILLIAM M. NICKERSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 101 WEST LOMBARD STREET BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201 (410) 962-7810 FACSIMILE (410) 962-2577 January 25, 2011 All counsel of record Re: Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Alan and Kristin Hudson Farm et al. Civil Action No. WMN-10-487 Dear Counsel: I am in receipt of your letters regarding a modification of the Court’s scheduling order. Without crediting or rejecting counsels’ characterization of the conduct of opposing counsel, the Court finds that an extension of all of the remaining deadlines by two weeks is appropriate. Accordingly, the scheduling order is modified to include the following deadlines. Plaintiff’s Rule 26(a)(2) February 11, 2011 Disclosures re: experts Defendants’ Rule 26(a)(2) March 29, 2011 Disclosures re: experts Plaintiff’s rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2) April 15, 2011 Disclosures re: experts Rule 26(e)(2) supplementation April 29, 2011 of disclosures and responses Discovery Deadline; submission May 9, 2011 of status report Requests for Admission May 20, 2011 Dispositive Pretrial Motions July 11, 2011 Notwithstanding the informal nature of this correspondence, it is an order of the Court and will be docketed as such. Sincerely, /s/ William M. Nickerson Senior United States District Judge cc: Court File Case 1:10-cv-00487-WMN Document 46 Filed 01/25/11 Page 1 of 1

Upload: carter-wood

Post on 28-Mar-2015

51 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: gov.uscourts.mdd.176071.46.0

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

CHAMBERS OF

WILLIAM M. NICKERSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

101 WEST LOMBARD STREET BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201

(410) 962-7810

FACSIMILE (410) 962-2577 January 25, 2011

All counsel of record Re: Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Alan and Kristin Hudson Farm et al. Civil Action No. WMN-10-487 Dear Counsel: I am in receipt of your letters regarding a modification of the Court’s scheduling order. Without crediting or rejecting counsels’ characterization of the conduct of opposing counsel, the Court finds that an extension of all of the remaining deadlines by two weeks is appropriate. Accordingly, the scheduling order is modified to include the following deadlines. Plaintiff’s Rule 26(a)(2) February 11, 2011 Disclosures re: experts Defendants’ Rule 26(a)(2) March 29, 2011 Disclosures re: experts Plaintiff’s rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2) April 15, 2011 Disclosures re: experts Rule 26(e)(2) supplementation April 29, 2011 of disclosures and responses Discovery Deadline; submission May 9, 2011 of status report Requests for Admission May 20, 2011 Dispositive Pretrial Motions July 11, 2011 Notwithstanding the informal nature of this correspondence, it is an order of the Court and will be docketed as such. Sincerely, /s/ William M. Nickerson Senior United States District Judge cc: Court File

Case 1:10-cv-00487-WMN Document 46 Filed 01/25/11 Page 1 of 1