government risk briefings internal controls & fraud prevention in local government november 16,...

81
Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132 │ 314.983.1200 1520 S. Fifth St., Suite 309 │ St. Charles, Missouri 63303 │ 636.255.3000 2220 S. State Route 157, Ste. 300 │ Glen Carbon, Illinois 62034 │ 618.654.3100 1.888.279.2792 │ www.bswllc.com Ron Steinkamp, CPA, CIA, CFE, CRMA 314.983.1238 | [email protected]

Upload: janice-gallagher

Post on 24-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Government Risk BriefingsInternal Controls & Fraud Prevention in

Local Government

November 16, 2012

1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132 │ 314.983.1200 1520 S. Fifth St., Suite 309 │ St. Charles, Missouri 63303 │ 636.255.3000

2220 S. State Route 157, Ste. 300 │ Glen Carbon, Illinois 62034 │ 618.654.3100 1.888.279.2792 │ www.bswllc.com

Ron Steinkamp, CPA, CIA, CFE, CRMA314.983.1238 | [email protected]

Page 2: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 2

Agenda

•Internal Control Defined

•Key Controls

•Control Examples

•Fraud Defined

•Fraud Survey Results

•Common Areas of Control Abuse

•Fraud Prevention

•Fraud Protection Tools

Page 3: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

INTERNAL CONTROL DEFINED

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 3

Page 4: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) - Internal Control Integrated Framework

The Report:• Established a common definition of internal control • Provided a standard (criteria) to assess the effectiveness of

internal controls• Became the standard for internal control recognized by the U.S.

accounting profession

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 4

COSO

Page 5: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

COSO defines internal control “as a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:

• Effectiveness and efficiency of operations

• Reliability of financial reporting

• Compliance with applicable laws and regulations

Internal Controls can help…

• An organization ensure the quality of financial reporting

• An organization achieve its performance and profitability targets and prevent a loss of resources

• An organization comply with laws and regulations, avoiding damage to its reputation and other consequences

• An organization prevent the theft or inappropriate use of assets

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 5

Definition of Internal Control

Page 6: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

COSO defines five categories of Internal Control:

1. Control Environment

2. Risk Assessment

3. Control Activities

4. Information and Communication

5. Monitoring

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 6

COSO Control Categories

Page 7: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

1. Control Environment - Sets the tone of an organization and influences the control consciousness of its people.

• Is the foundation for all other components of internal control, and

• Provides discipline and structure

• Factors include… Integrity, ethical values and competence of the entity’s people Management’s philosophy and operating style The way management assigns authority and responsibility, and organizes and

develops its people, and The attention and direction provided by the board of directors

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 7

COSO Control Categories

Page 8: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

2. Risk Assessment - Every entity faces a variety of risks from external and internal sources that must be assessed both at the entity and the activity level

• The identification and analysis of relevant risks to the achievement of objectives• Forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 8

COSO Control Categories

Page 9: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

3. Control Activities - Are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out

• Help ensure that necessary actions are taken to address risks to the achievement of the entity’s objectives

• Occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in all functions

• Include activities such as approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 9

COSO Control Categories

Page 10: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

4. Information and Communication – Pertinent information must be identified, captured and communicated in a form and timeframe that supports all other control components

• Produces reports containing operational, financial and compliance related information

• Also deals with information concerning external events, activities and conditions necessary to enable informed business decision-making and external reporting

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 10

COSO Control Categories

Page 11: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

5. Monitoring - Internal control systems need to be monitored – a process that assesses the quality of the system’s performance over time

• Occurs in the course of operations

• Includes reviews of operating performance, security of assets and segregation of duties

• Internal control deficiencies should be reported upstream, with significant deficiencies and material weaknesses reported to top management, the audit committee, and the external auditor

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 11

COSO Control Categories

Page 12: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Management

• Board of Directors

• Internal Audit

• Other Personnel

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 12

Control Roles and Responsibilities

Page 13: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 13

KEY CONTROLS

Page 14: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Preventative controls

• Detective controls

• Manual controls

• Computer controls

• Management controls

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 14

Types of Controls

Page 15: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Code of conduct• Policies and procedures manual• Segregation of duties• Records retention• Documentation of transactions• Budgetary• Fraud Policy and reporting• Access to systems

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 15

General Controls

Page 16: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Policies and procedures.• All bank accounts opened and maintained in organizations

name with proper approval.• Segregate access to cash from accounting for cash.• Monthly reconciliation of recorded balances to bank

account detail by employees not involved in cash activities.• Control credit cards and reconcile to receipts on a timely

basis.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 16

Cash Management Controls

Page 17: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Policies and procedures.• All orders received are processed and recorded.• All orders processed are invoiced.• All invoices are posted to customer accounts.• Billings are accurate.

Revenue Cycle Common Controls

Page 18: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Policies and procedures.• All purchase orders are authorized.• All vendors are authorized.• Individuals have authorization limits.• Check stock is controlled.• EDI/ACH transactions require authorization.• Credit card purchases are controlled and statements are

reconciled to detailed receipts.

Procurement Cycle Common Controls

Page 19: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Procedures for adding, changing, removing employees and related pay and benefits.

• Payroll personnel can not add/change/delete employees and related pay and benefits.

• All changes are authorized by management.• Payroll preparation segregated from payroll authorization,

check signing and distribution.• Access to payroll is restricted.• Safeguard checks.• Reconciliations.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 19

Payroll Common Controls

Page 20: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Procedures for adding and removing fixed assets.• Detailed records of all fixed assets.• Tracking of fixed assets.• Inventory fixed assets and reconcile to records periodically.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 20

Fixed Assets Common Controls

Page 21: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Accurate, Timely, and Consistent Reporting.• Recorded balances should be periodically substantiated and

evaluated.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 21

Management Reporting Common Controls

Page 22: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Exception reporting• Shipping/Receiving• Physical Inventory Monitoring• Perpetual Records• Controlling slow-moving and obsolete inventories• Scrap• Adjustments are controlled• Cycle counting• Disposal

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 22

Inventory Monitoring Common Controls

Page 23: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Back-ups• Disaster Recovery• Security (Physical & logical)• Virus Protection• Administrative

- Change control- Trouble reporting- Helpdesk- Systems Development Life Cycle

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 23

IT Common Controls

Page 24: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

CONTROL EXAMPLES

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 24

Page 25: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Authorization – Authorization controls require that a transaction be “authorized” or approved prior to executing the transaction.

Examples:

• Legal department approves a contract prior to execution.

• Controller signs Accounts Payable checks greater than a set amount.

• Accounting Supervisor approves journal entries prepared by the Clerk prior to entry into the system.

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 25

Authorization Controls

Page 26: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

25

Segregation of Duties – These controls split responsibilities for a process so that it requires more than one person to execute a transaction or complete a process.

Examples:

• Personnel accepting/processing cash receipts do not deposit, record or reconcile receipts.

• Personnel that edit the vendor master files do not process invoices.

• A person separate from the approval process sets up users on the system.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC

Segregation of Duties

Page 27: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Reconciliations – This involves comparing to items, from different sources, to determine if transactions were executed accurately and completely.

Examples:

• Reconciling the accounts receivable sub-ledger to the general ledger.

• Reconciling the bank statements to the general ledger.

• Reconciling credit card statements to the related detail.

• Physically inventorying fixed assets and comparing them to the fixed asset system.

Reconciliations

Page 28: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Management Review – This involves a review, by a manager/supervisor, of executed transactions/activities for appropriateness.

Examples:

• The Finance Director review the bank and credit card reconciliations for reasonableness.

• The Payroll Manager reviews a report of the payroll run to ensure that the total run is consistent with past periods.

• The owner of a process reviews a listing of personnel that have access to the system that supports the process.

Management Review

Page 29: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

System Access – System Access controls prevent a person from executing a transaction because they cannot log on to the system or have not been granted the specific transaction authority.

Examples:

• AP personnel are not given user accounts on the payroll system.

• Only accounting personnel can post journal entries in the system.

• Only the Finance Director and/or City Administrator can authorize payments out of the system.

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 29

System Access Controls

Page 30: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Configuration/Account Mapping – This is a control that is performed by the system/application and prevents the execution of a transaction unless certain parameters are met.

Examples:

• The AP system automatically populates the payee field of a check from the vendor master file.

• The Revenue system automatically calculates the invoice amount based on contract data and payroll data.

• System functionality prevents the posting of journal entries to a prior period.

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 30

Configuration/Account Mapping

Page 31: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

30

Exception/Edit Reports – These controls alert you to changes/issues in the system via an online or paper report.

Examples:

• An edit report that lists all changes to the vendor master file.

• An exception report that identifies all AP checks over a certain amount.

• A report that identifies payroll exceptions/adjustments.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC

Exception/Edit Reports

Page 32: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Key Performance Indicators – These are analytical indicators of performance metrics that help to identify incorrect transactions or breakdowns in the control system.

Examples:

• Variance Reports (Budget to Actual, Prior to Current Period, Etc.)

• Production Reports (Rate per Hour, Utilization, Etc.)

Key Performance Indicators

Page 33: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

FRAUD DEFINED

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 33

Page 34: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

The use of one’s occupation for personal enrichment through the deliberate misuse or application of the employing organization’s resources or assets.

Three general categories:

Asset misappropriation

Corruption

Financial statement fraud

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 34

What is Fraud?

Page 35: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Perpetrator steals or misuses an organizations resources.

- Examples:• Clerk stealing cash receipts.• Payroll Clerk creating a ghost employee.• Purchasing Clerk creating a fictitious vendor and false invoice.• Street Department personnel “borrowing” equipment.• City Manager purchasing personal items on the City credit card.

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 35

Asset Misappropriation

Page 36: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Employee’s use of his/her influence in business transactions in a way that violates his/her duty to the employer for the purpose of obtaining benefit for him/herself or someone else.

- Examples:• City Council member trading votes for personal favors.• Purchasing Department Manager awarding a City contract to a

vendor for a kickback.• Human Resources Director hiring unqualified “friends” to fill

positions.

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 36

Corruption

Page 37: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Intentional misstatement or omission of material information in the organization’s financial reports.

- Examples:• Inflating City revenues on the Consolidated Annual Financial

Report.• Forcing actual expenditures to match budget by moving

expenses between accounts.• Improperly accounting for grant receipts and expenditures.

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 37

Financial Statement Fraud

Page 38: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

FRAUD SURVEY RESULTS

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 38

Page 39: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

2012 Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 39

2012 ACFE Global Fraud Study

Page 40: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 40

Summary of Findings

1. Typical fraud losses equal 5% of revenue

2. Asset misappropriation - the most common

3. Financial statement fraud - the least common

4. Frauds are most likely to be detected by tips

5. Small organizations are disproportionately victimized by occupational fraud

6. Fraud perpetrators often display warning signs

7. Government/public administration is one of the most victimized industries

8. Anti-fraud controls help reduce the cost and duration of occupational fraud

9. High-level perpetrators cause the greatest damage to their organizations

10. Nearly 50% of all victim organizations do not recover any losses

Page 41: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Implement hotlines to receive tips from internal/external sources

• Organizations over-rely on audits

• Most frauds are detected by tips

• Anti-fraud training among employees and managers result in fewer fraud losses

• Surprise audits are an effective fraud prevention tool

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 41

Conclusions & Recommendations

Page 42: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Using internal controls as your sole fraud prevention strategy is insufficient

• Employees exhibit behavior warning signs

• Employees should be trained to recognize common signs of fraud

• Effective fraud prevention measures are critical

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 42

Conclusions & Recommendations

Page 43: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Pressure or Incentive (NEED)

High personal debtsSubstance or gambling abuseJob frustrationResentment of superiors

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 43

Common Characteristic/Red Flags

Opportunity

• Inadequate internal controls• Weak management• Excessive turnover• Large amounts of cash on hand or processed

Rationalization

• Unfairly compensated• Everyone else does it• Intension of repayment• Financial need

Page 44: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

COMMON AREAS OF CONTROL ABUSE

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 44

Page 45: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Failure to establish:• Policies & procedures• Segregation of duties• Third-party oversight (boards)

Failure to oversee/supervise/review Overworking/underpaying staff to make budget Inappropriate use of cell phone, company credit cards, autos,

and expense reports Inadequate IT Access Controls Not allowing Internal Audit to look at a department Non-responsive to management inquiries

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 45

Internal Control Abuse by Management

Page 46: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Three major reasons these events occur:1. It pays to do it2. It is easy to do3. It is unlikely you will get caught

Indicators of possible management fraud1. A week control environment2. Management facing extreme competitive pressure3. Management known or suspected of having questionable

character

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 46

Why Management?

Page 47: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 47

Internal Control Abuses by Employees

• Accounts payable fabrication• Accounts receivable manipulation• Bank fraud• Bid rigging• Check forgery and counterfeiting• Credit card fraud• Embezzlement• Expense account abuse

• Fictitious vendors, customers, employees

• Kickbacks• Material misstatement• Medical/insurance claims

overstatement• Unnecessary purchases or

purchases for own use

Page 48: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Check tampering occurs when an employee:• Prepares a fraudulent check for his/her own benefit• Intercepts a check intended for a third party and converts

the check to benefit his/herself.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 48

Example – Check Tampering

Page 49: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can check tampering be prevented?• Check stock should be locked in a secure location to ensure

blank checks are not accessible to potential fraudsters.• Checks should be mailed immediately after signing to

reduce the risk of legitimate checks being stolen.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 49

Example – Check Tampering

Page 50: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can check tampering potentially be detected through data analysis?• Perhaps better identified through other ways.

- Bank reconciliations- Communication with vendors

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 50

Example – Check Tampering

Page 51: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Billing schemes occur when an employee submits a false invoice or alters an existing one, thus causing the company to willingly (but unknowingly) issue a check for false expenses.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 51

Example – Billing Schemes

Page 52: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can billing schemes be prevented?• Prior to authorizing payment, invoices should be checked for validity of

the vendor, validity of the goods or services invoiced, accuracy, and authenticity.

• Prior to processing payment, invoices should be checked for proper authorization, accuracy and authenticity. This will prevent overpayment, as well as payments being made to fictitious vendors.

• Strictly control access to vendor master data.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 52

Example – Billing Schemes

Page 53: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can billing schemes be potentially be detected through data analysis?• Vendor-level expenditures analysis• Benford analysis• Duplicates analysis• Vendor master data analysis

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 53

Example – Billing Schemes

Page 54: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Expense reimbursement schemes occur when an employee submits false expenses in the hope of being reimbursed by the company.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 54

Example – Fraudulent Expense Reimbursements

Page 55: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can fraudulent expense reimbursements be prevented?• Require original itemized receipts.• Receipts should be scrutinized to detect alterations or forgeries.• Other means of proving incurred expenses, such as airline itineraries,

credit card statements, etc. should not be accepted unless approved by a supervisor.

• All expense reimbursements should be reviewed and immediately processed upon approval.

• Use a specific credit card for all business expenses. Receive this information electronically from credit card company and require electronic filing of expense reports by employees. This will minimize the possibility of fraud, and if fraud is occurring, will provide an easier means to identify it.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 55

Example – Fraudulent Expense Reimbursements

Page 56: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can fraudulent expense reimbursements potentially be detected through data analysis?

• Use a specific credit card for all business expenses. Receive this information electronically from credit card company and require electronic filing of expense reports by employees. Reconcile the two data sets.

• Duplicates analysis.

• Benford analysis.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 56

Example – Fraudulent Expense Reimbursements

Page 57: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Payroll fraud occurs when an employee submits false documentation (i.e. timecards) in an effort to inflate his/her wages/salary. Such documentation prompts the organization to unknowingly disburse funds to the perpetrator.

Possible ways in which Payroll Fraud can occur:

• Falsified hours and salary

• Ghost employees

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 57

Example - Payroll Fraud

Page 58: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can payroll fraud be prevented? • All timecards should be reviewed for validity and accuracy.• Once submitted for approval, employees should never see their

timecard again. • Overtime hours must be authorized by a supervisor.• If employees use a time clock to “punch in” and “punch out”, they

must do so when they arrive for work, take breaks, go to lunch, leave for the day, etc.

• Monitor employees to assure one employee is not punching out for another.

• Strictly control access to payroll master data.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 58

Example - Payroll Fraud

Page 59: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can payroll fraud be detected through data analysis?

• Review personnel files for duplicate addresses, P.O. boxes, or social security numbers. Duplicate information may suggest “ghost” employees are on the payroll.

• Perform an employee-level hours analysis, comparing employees’ hours with peers in their departments.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 59

Example - Payroll Fraud

Page 60: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Receipts interception occurs when an employee:

• Has access to customer payments

• Directs intercepted receipts to personal accounts

Receipts interception can be difficult to detect if the fraudster also has access to manipulate accounts receivable records or customer credit memos.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 60

Example – Receipts Interception

Page 61: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can receipts interception be prevented?

• Segregate cash receipts and accounting responsibility.

• Issue receipts.

• Track receipts in system and reconcile daily.

• Surprise cash counts.

• Cameras.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 61

Example – Receipts Interception

Page 62: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

How can receipts interception be detected through data analysis?

• Identify gap or sequence errors in accounts receivable records.

• Perform a customer level analysis of credit memos.

© 2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 62

Example – Receipts Interception

Page 63: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

FRAUD PREVENTION

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 63

Page 64: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Create an anti-fraud environment

• Know your fraud risks

• Develop an oversight process

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 64

How to Prevent Fraud

Page 65: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 65

Create an Anti-Fraud Environment

Set the Tone at the Top

• Hold elected officials and management responsible

• Lead by example

• Behave ethically

• Openly communicate expectations to employees

• Maintain a zero tolerance policy

• Treat all employees equally, regardless of position

• Enforce a code of conduct founded on integrity

Page 66: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 66

Create an Anti-Fraud Environment

Create a Positive Workplace Environment

• Poor employee morale can affect attitudes about committing fraud

• HR is instrumental in helping to build a positive work environment

• Employees should be empowered to help create a positive workplace

Page 67: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 67

Create an Anti-Fraud Environment

Hire and Promote Appropriate Employees

• Conduct background investigations; verifying education, employment history and references

• Give regular performance reviews

• Perform an objective compliance review of your code of conduct and ethic policies at consistent intervals Address violations immediately

Page 68: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 68

Create an Anti-Fraud Environment

Fraud Awareness / Training

• All new employees should be trained upon hiring on values and code of conduct

• Offer periodic refresher training for all employees

Page 69: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 69

Create an Anti-Fraud Environment

Confirmation

• Clearly articulate that all employees are held accountable to act within the code of conduct

• Have a written Code of Conduct statement

Discipline

• Actions should be taken in response to any alleged incident of fraud

• Expectations about the consequences of committing fraud must be clearly communicated throughout the entity

Page 70: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 70

Know Your Fraud Risks

• Identify and measure fraud risks

• Mitigate fraud risks

• Implement and monitor appropriate internal controls

Page 71: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

To effectively prevent or deter fraud, an entity should have an appropriate oversight function in place that includes the following:

• Audit committee

• Management

• Internal auditors

• Independent auditors

• Certified fraud examiners

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 71

Develop An Oversight Process

Page 72: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

FRAUD PROTECTION TOOLS

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 72

Page 73: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Should be based on the organization’s core values

• Established by executive management and a board with input from employees

• Written documentation consisting of: Clear guidance on what behaviors and actions are/are not permitted Detailed documentation of employee responsibilities in the prevention

and detection of fraud Procedures on how employees should seek additional advice when

faced with uncertain ethical decisions Process for communicating concerns about known or potential

wrongdoing

• All employees should be trained on the code of conduct when hired, and annual refresher training with affirmation should be provided

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 73

Code of Conduct (AKA – Antifraud Policy)

Page 74: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Communication system that enables employees, vendors, customers and others to communicate concerns about known or potential/suspected wrongdoing.

Telephone, email, web site

Anonymous

Adequately publicized

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 74

Anti – Fraud Hotline

Page 75: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• ACFE tool

• High level assessment of an organization’s fraud health

• Identifies major gaps in fraud prevention processes and fixes them before it is too late

• Focus of a Fraud Prevention Checkup is: Fraud risk oversight Fraud risk ownership Fraud risk assessment Fraud risk tolerance and risk management policy Anti-fraud controls Proactive fraud detection

• Should be completed by a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE)

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 75

Fraud Prevention Checkup

Page 76: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Assists management in systematically identifying where and how fraud may occur and who may be in a position to commit fraud

• Focuses on fraud schemes and scenarios to determine whether or not the current internal controls can be circumvented

• Five general steps: Identify relevant fraud risk factors Identify potential fraud schemes and prioritize based on risk Map existing controls to potential fraud schemes and

identify gaps Test operating effectiveness of fraud prevention and

detection controls Document and report the fraud risk assessment

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 76

Fraud Risk Assessment

Page 77: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Data Analysis is great for analyzing trends and identifying unusual items and changes to operations

• A systemic and efficient way of verifying 100% of transactions and reducing risks

• Highlights red flags and identifies errors, fraud, inefficient operations and audit targets

• Identifies control weaknesses/breakdowns before they cause too much damage

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 77

Data Analysis

Page 78: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Results from a concern or suspicion of wrongdoing

• Consists of gathering sufficient information about specific details and performing procedures necessary to determine:

Whether fraud has occurred

The loss or exposure associated with the fraud

Who was involved, and how it happened

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 78

Fraud Review / Investigation

Page 79: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

• Must prepare, document and preserve evidence sufficient for potential legal proceedings

• Must carefully manage in accordance with laws

• Include legal counsel

• Include internal audit

• Include expertise – Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE)

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 79

Fraud Review / Investigation

Page 80: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Have you identified your key processes and control?

Have you tested the key controls?

Have you identified your fraud risks?

What are your fraud risks?

How are you mitigating these risks?

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 80

Question/Discussion

Page 81: Government Risk Briefings Internal Controls & Fraud Prevention in Local Government November 16, 2012 1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. │ St. Louis, Missouri 63132

Ron Steinkamp, CPA, CIA, CFE, CRMA

Principal, Risk Advisory Services

Brown Smith Wallace LLC

314.983.1238 (Direct)

[email protected]

© 2011-2012 All Rights Reserved Brown Smith Wallace LLC 81

Contact Information