government of p unjab - punjab roads & …prbdb.gov.in/files/tnm/mpr sep 2016.pdf ·...

Rep

eport pr

WORL

Punj

OutpuImprove

T

repared

MON

GD BANK

jab Ro

ut and ement, Re

Sang

NM

d by TNM

MonitoCon

S

NTHLY

GOVEK FUND

oads

Perforehabilita

grur‐M

TECHNOMANAG

M – ICR

oring Connstruction

D.A.Sangrur,

Y PROGSepte

RNMED PUN

& Bri

rmancation, Res

ansa‐B

OLOGY AGEMENT

RA Mana

nsultant - Division.C Block Punjab -

GRESSember

ENT NJAB ST

dges

ce Basesurfacing

Bathin

ANDLTD.

agement

Project O, PWD B&– 2 148001

S REPOr 2016

OF PTATE RO

Deve

ed Roag and Ro

da Roa

t Consul

Office &R

ORT N6

UNJAOAD SEC

lopme

ad Contutine Ma

ad Net

33

lting Se

o. 24

AB CTOR P

ent B

tract (aintenan

twork

33333333

ervices L

ROJECT

oard

OPRC)ce works

3

Ltd

T

) s

TNM

OPRC WorlMonthly Pro

ABREV

AASHTOAADT AC ASTM BANK Base YeBC BDS BM BoQ CBR CoI CQAMPDBM DCP DgMark

DRB EHS EIA EMP EIRR ESA ESMF FIDIC

FWD FWP GC or GGDP GOI GOP IBRD ICB IDA INR IRC IRI IRR ITB JV JVA km LOS MC

M TECHNOMANAG

ld Bank Project fogress Report No 24

VIATION

O AmeAnnuAsphAmeWor

ear Last BitumBid DBitumBill oCalifCorr

P ContDensDyna

ket IntergoveDispEnviEnviEnviEconEquiEnviFedeConsFallinForw

GCC GeneGrosGoveGoveInterInterInterIndiaIndiaInterInterInstrJointJointKilomLeveMon

OLOGY AND GEMENT LTD.

or Sangrur Mansa4 (September 2016)

S

erican Assocual Averagehalt Concreterican Socierld Bank Completedminous ConData Sheet minous Maof Quantitiefornia Beariidor of Imptract Qualitse Bituminoamic Cone Prnational poernments anute Reviewronment Heronmental ronmental nomic Internvalent Stanronmental eration Intesulting Enging Weight Dward Work Peral Conditiss Domesticernment of ernment of rnational Barnational Cornational Dean Rupees an Roads Cornational Rornal Rate ofructions to Bt Venture t Venture Ametre el of Servicenitoring Con

a Bathinda Netwo

ciation of Ste Daily Traffte ty for Testin

d Financial Yncrete

cadam es ng Ratio act y Assuranceous MacadaPenetrometortal for tennd interna

w Board ealth and SaImpact AssManagemenal Rate of ndard AxelSocial Manarnational Dneers DeflectomeProgrammeions of Contc ProductIndia Punjabank for Rehompetitive evelopment

ongressoughness Inf ReturnBidders

Agreement

e nsultant

ork in Punjab (Ind

tate Highwafic

ng and Mat

Year at the t

e Managemamter nders and ptional orga

afetysessment ent PlanReturn

agement FrDes Ingénieu

ter etract

abilitation aBiddingt Associatio

ndex

dia)

ay and Tran

terials

time of rece

ment Plan

rocuremennisations (w

ramework urs‐Conseils

and Develo

on

sportation

eipt of the B

t opportunwww.dgmar

s ‐ Internatio

pment

Officials

Bids

ities from rket.com)

onal Federa

2

ation of

TNM


MBCB MDR MEC MOEF MORT&MPa MPD MPM MSA NH NHAI NPV ODR OPRC PAP PC PCU PIRR PSPCB PWD PRBDB PSRSP QA QC RAP RDPM ROMDAROW RPM RUS&CPSDBC SH SIA TMP TOR UNDB

WB

M TECHNOMANAG


MetaMajoMonMini

&H MiniMegMeaManMilliNatioNatioNet OtheOutpProjePartPassProjePunjPubl

PunjPunjQuaQuaReseRoad

AS RoadRighRaise

PM RoadSemStateSociaTraffTermUnitonlinWor



al Beam Craor District Rnitoring Conistry of Enviistry of RoagaPascal. Unan Profile Denagement Pon (Equivalonal Highwonal HighwPresent Valer District Rput and Perect Affectedicular Condenger Car Uect Internalab State Poic Works Deab Roads aab State Rolity Assuranlity Control ettlement Ad Durabilityd Measuremt of Way ed Pavemend User Servi Dense Bitue Highway al Impact Afic Managemms of Refereed Nations ne rld Bank

a Bathinda Netwo

ash BarrierRoad nsultant, Emironment and Transportnit of Measuepth erformanceent) Standaay ays Authorilue Road rformance Bd Person itions of CoUnit l Rate of Reollution Conepartmentnd Bridges oad Sector Pnce

Action Plany Performanment Data A

nt Markerice and Comuminous Co

ssessmentment Planence Developme

ork in Punjab (Ind

mployer, Connd Forestst and Highwurement

e Measuresard Axels

ity of India

Based Road

ontract

turn (PIRR)ntrol Board

DevelopmeProject

nce MeasureAcquisition

mfort Perforoncrete

ent Busines

dia)

ntractor

ways

Contract

ent Board

e System

rmance Me

s online (ww

easure

ww.devbus

iness.com)

3

TNM


TABLE

1 PRO

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

2 PRO

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.7

3 WO

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

M TECHNOMANAG


EOFCON

OJECT HIGHL

Significant

Physical Pr

Crash Reco

Snapshots

OJECT OVER

Backgroun

Agencies I

Contract A

Organisati

Responsib

Project Or

Basic Cont

.1 Proje

ORK PROGRE

Improvem

.1 Work

.2 Work

.3 Work

.4 Work

.5 Work

.6 Chang

Road Dura

.1 Roug

.2 Struct

Network P

.1 Pavem

.2 Unsea

.3 Drain

.4 Routi

.5 Obstr

.6 Incide

.7 Veget

.8 Road



NTENTS

LIGHTS FOR

t Events .......

rogress ........

ord Update .

s – Pictorial O

RVIEW .........

nd ................

nvolved in th

Administratio

on & Respon

ilities of the

ganization ..

tract Feature

ct Brief .......

ESS ‐ SUMMA

ment, Rehabil

ks Done ‐ Firs

ks Done ‐ Sec

k Done ‐ Thir

ks Under ‐ Fo

k Progress ‐ F

ge in Propos

ability’s Over

hness ..........

tural Capacit

Performance

ment Mainte

aled Shoulde

nage Mainten

ne Maintena

ruction on th

ent Response

tation Contr

Signs Maint

a Bathinda Netwo

THE MONTH

....................

....................

....................

Overview ......

...................

....................

he OPRC Pro

on Chart .......

nsibilities – M

Monitoring

....................

es .................

....................

ARY AND CO

itation and R

st Year .........

cond Year .....

d Year ..........

ourth Year Pr

Fourth Year P

sal: ...............

rview ............

....................

ty Data (Pave

Works’ Ove

enance (RUS&

er Maintenan

nance (RUS&

ance of Bridg

he Pavement

e and Emerg

ol (RUS&CPM

enance (RUS

ork in Punjab (Ind

H OF SEPTEM

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

oject .............

....................

Monitoring C

Consultant .

....................

....................

....................

OMMENTS ..

Resurfacing W

....................

....................

....................

rogramme ...

Programme .

....................

....................

....................

ement Defle

rview ..........

&CPM‐1) ....

nce (RUS&CP

&CPM‐3) ......

ges and Othe

t Surface and

gency Works

M‐7) ............

S&CPM‐8) ...

dia)

MBER 2016 ..

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

Consultant ....

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

Works ..........

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ctions) .........

....................

....................

PM‐2) ..........

....................

er Structures

d Shoulders (

Response (R

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

s (RUS&CPM

(RUS&CPM‐5

RUS&CPM‐6)

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

– 4) ............

5) .................

) ...................

....................

....................

4

........... 9

............ 9

............ 9

............ 9

.......... 11

.......... 13

.......... 13

.......... 14

.......... 15

.......... 15

.......... 15

.......... 16

.......... 16

.......... 17

.......... 19

.......... 19

.......... 20

.......... 21

.......... 21

.......... 21

.......... 22

.......... 22

.......... 23

.......... 23

.......... 24

.......... 26

.......... 27

.......... 27

.......... 28

.......... 29

.......... 29

.......... 29

.......... 29

.......... 30

TNM


3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.6

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.8

3.9

4 ENV

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

5 RO

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6

5.7

5.8

5.9

6 CO

M TECHNOMANAG


.9 Raise

.10 Pavem

.11 Traffi

.12 Crash

.13 Sight

.14 Mark

Other Obs

Recomme

Consolidat

6.1 Contr

Summary &

.1 Analy

.2 Mana

.3 Road

.4 Road

Verificatio

Audit Insp

VIRONMENT

Environme

Complianc

Status of G

Status of P

Status of S

Future key

AD SAFETY A

Introductio

Crash Reco

Crash Ana

Trend in C

Road Safet

Road Safet

Road Safet

Way Forw

Distributio

NTRACTOR’S



d Reflective

ment Markin

c Island and

h Barrier Mai

Rail, Hand R

er Post Main

servations on

ndation for N

ted Audit Re

ractor's Audi

& Compariso

ysis and Com

agement Per

Durability P

User Service

on of Contrac

ection Photo

TAL & SOCIA

ental Manag

ce as per Env

General facili

Physical Envi

Statuary Clea

y issues as re

AND TRAFFIC

on ...............

ords .............

lysis ............

rashes .........

ty Audit .......

ty Audit Find

ty Strategies

ard ..............

on of fatal cra

S STAFF AND

a Bathinda Netwo

Pavement M

ng (RUS&CPM

Roundabou

intenance (R

Rail and Pede

ntenance (RU

n Audit Sectio

Network Per

port .............

it Report on

on of Contra

mments of the

rformance M

erformance

e and Comfo

ctor’s Audit R

ographic Rec

AL MANAGEM

ement .........

vironmental

ities at Contr

ronmental A

arances Appl

eviewed from

C MANAGEM

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

dings ............

s ...................

....................

ashes in the

D CONSTRUC

ork in Punjab (Ind

Markers (RUS

M‐10) ..........

t Maintenan

RUS&CPM‐12

estrian Barrie

US&CPM‐14)

ons ..............

rformance W

....................

September2

ctor’s Audit

e Performan

Measures (MP

Measures (R

ort Performa

Report .........

cord of Non‐C

MENT .........

....................

Performance

ractor Camp

Aspects on Si

icable for pr

m the works

MENT ..........

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

OPRC netwo

CTION EQUIP

dia)

S&CPM 9) ....

....................

nce (RUS&CP

2) ..................

er Maintenan

) ...................

....................

Works ............

....................

2016 .............

vs. Monitori

nce Audit Ins

PM’s) ...........

RDPM’S) .......

nce Measure

....................

Conformanc

...................

....................

e Indicators

Site .............

te ................

roject and Ca

programme

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ork ...............

PMENTS .....

....................

....................

PM‐11) .........

....................

nce (RUS&CP

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ing Consulta

pection .......

....................

....................

es ‐ RUS&CP

....................

es ................

...................

....................

as per World

....................

....................

amp site ......

and work m

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

PM‐13) ........

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

nt’s Audit ....

....................

....................

....................

M ................

....................

....................

...................

....................

d Bank guide

....................

....................

....................

ethod ..........

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

5

.......... 32

.......... 33

.......... 35

.......... 35

.......... 35

.......... 35

.......... 36

.......... 44

.......... 46

.......... 46

.......... 49

.......... 49

.......... 49

.......... 50

.......... 52

.......... 54

.......... 70

.......... 82

.......... 82

elines . 82

.......... 84

.......... 84

.......... 86

.......... 89

.......... 90

.......... 90

.......... 90

.......... 92

.......... 95

.......... 97

.......... 97

.......... 98

.......... 98

.......... 99

........ 105

TNM


6.1

6.1

6.1

6.2

6.3

6.4

7 PAY

7.1

7.2

7.3

8 CLA

8.1

8.2

8.3

8.4

9 ME

10 CO

10.1

10.2

M TECHNOMANAG


Contract’s

.1 Key S

.2 Key S

Contractor

Contractor

Review of

YMENTS .....

Network P

Financial P

Man hours

AIMS AND D

Dispute Re

Arbitration

Minutes o

Minutes o

EETINGS/INS

RRESPONDE

Correspon

Correspon



Staff as per

taff of Lead

taff Present

r’s Construct

r’s Staff Pres

Contractor’s

..................

Performance

Progress of O

s of Monitor

ISPUTES .....

eview Board

n Tribunal ...

f Arbitral Tri

f Dispute Re

SPECTIONS H

ENCE DONE B

ndence Sent .

ndence Recei

a Bathinda Netwo

Contract Ag

Contractor P

at Site in Se

tion Equipme

sent – Septem

s Staff ..........

...................

for the mon

OPRC Till Dat

ring Consulta

...................

(DRB) ..........

....................

bunal Meeti

view Board M

HELD DURING

BY THE OFFI

....................

ived .............

ork in Punjab (Ind

greement .....

Present at Sit

ptember 201

ent’s Septem

mber 2016 ..

....................

...................

nth of Septem

e .................

ant Staff .......

...................

....................

....................

ng ...............

Meeting ......

G THE MONT

CE OF MONI

....................

....................

dia)

....................

te in the mo

16 ................

mber 2016 ....

....................

....................

...................

mber 2016 ...

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

TH ..............

ITORING CO

....................

....................

....................

nth of Septe

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

NSULTANT ..

....................

....................

....................

ember2016 ...

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

...................

....................

....................

6

........ 105

........ 105

........ 105

........ 106

........ 107

........ 107

........ 108

........ 108

........ 108

........ 109

........ 110

........ 110

........ 110

........ 110

........ 110

........ 111

........ 112

........ 112

........ 114

TNM


LISTO

Figure 2Figure 2Figure 2Figure 2Figure 2Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5Figure 5

M TECHNOMANAG


OFFIGUR

2‐1 : OPRC Or2‐2 : Contract2‐3 : Organiza2‐4 : Major c2‐5 : OPRC N3‐1 : Overall 3‐2 : 4th Yea3‐3 : Rutting 3‐4 : Low sho3‐5 : Vegetat3‐6 : Substan3‐7 : Poor Ma3‐8: The defic5‐1: OPRC Ne5‐2: OPRC Ne5‐3: OPRC Ne5‐4: OPRC Ne5‐5: OPRC Ne5‐6 : Fatal Cra5‐7 : Fatal Cra5‐8 : Fatal Cra5‐9 : Fatal Cra5‐10 : Fatal C5‐11 : Fatal C



RES

rganization Ct Administraation Chart ocomponents Network MapWork Progr

ar Works (Phand Shovingoulder and reion on shoudard Roadsiaintenance ociency recoretwork – Secetwork – Secetwork – Speetwork – Fatetwork – Craash Locationash Locationash Locationash Locationrash Locatiorash Locatio

a Bathinda Netwo

Chart ...........ation Chart ..of Monitorinof Civil Worp ..................ress (Physicahysical Progreg at Pavemeneverse slopelders at S5 Ride Signs ......of RPMs. ......ded against ction Length ction Length eeding & Aligality Trend ..ash Trend .....ns at Sectionns at Sectionns at Sectionns at Sectionons at Sectioons at Sectio

ork in Punjab (Ind

....................

....................ng Consultanrks under OP....................al Progress) .ess) .............nt observed e on S5 RoadRoad Section........................................Pavement Mv Number ov Number ognment as F........................................ S1 .............. S2 .............. S3 .............. S4 ..............n S5 ............n B8 ............

dia)

....................

....................nt .................PRC project .............................................................on S2 Road Section ......n ...........................................................Marking .......of Fatalities&of Crashes& Cactors in Cra................................................................................................................................................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................Section ..........................................................................................................& Fatality RaCrash Rates ashes ...........................................................................................................................................................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................tes .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................

7

.......... 13

.......... 15

.......... 16

.......... 17

.......... 18

.......... 20

.......... 20

.......... 27

.......... 28

.......... 30

.......... 32

.......... 33

.......... 34

.......... 93

.......... 94

.......... 95

.......... 96

.......... 96

.......... 99

........ 100

........ 101

........ 102

........ 103

........ 104

TNM


LISTO

Table 2‐Table 2‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 3‐Table 4‐Table 4‐Table 4‐Table 4‐Table 5‐Table 5‐Table 5‐Table 6‐Table 6‐Table 6‐Table 6‐Table 7‐Table 7‐Table 10Table 10

M TECHNOMANAG


OFTABLE

‐1 : Agencies‐2 : Network‐1 : Work Pro‐2 : Structura‐3 : Audit Sec‐4 : Accumul‐5 : Summary‐6: Managem‐7: Road Dur‐8 : Road Use‐9 : Summary‐10 : Manage‐11 : Road Du‐12 : Summa‐13 : Verifica‐14 : Verifica‐15 : Verifica‐16 : Verifica‐17 : Verifica‐18 : Verifica‐19 : Verifica‐20: Verificat‐21: Verificat‐22 : Verifica‐23 : Verifica‐24 : Verifica‐25 : Verifica‐26 : Verifica‐27 : Verifica‐28 : Verifica‐1: Complian‐2 : Status of‐3 : Status of‐4 : Status of‐1 : OPRC Ne‐2 : OPRC Ne‐3 : OPRC Ne‐1: Contracto‐2: Key Staff ‐3: Construct‐4 : Contact N‐1 : Man Hou‐2 : Man Hou0‐1 : Corresp0‐2 : Corresp



ES

s and Key Pek Road Sectioogram Approal Capacity Dctions for thated Scores y of Networment Performrability Perfoer Service any Non‐Confoement Perfourability Perary of Non–Cation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audition of Audittion of Auditation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audiation of Audince as per Enf General facf Physical Enf Statuary Cleetwork Crashetwork Fataletwork – Sumor’s Key Stafof Professiotion EquipmNo. of Contrurs (for the murs (for the mpondence Sepondence Re

a Bathinda Netwo

rsons involvons under OPoved vs. AchData (Paveme Month of Submitted bk Performanmance Measormance Mend Comfort Pormances .....ormance Mearformance MConformanceit – Section Sit – Section Sit –Section Sit – Section Sit – Section Sit – Section Sit – Section St – Section St – Section Sit – Section Sit – Section Sit – Section Sit – Section Sit – Section Bit – Section Bit – Section Bnvironmentacilities at Convironmentaearances Aph Details (Upities Details mmary of Craff as per Cononal Engineeent as per Cractor’s Staffmonth of Sepmonth of Sepnt ................eceived ........

ork in Punjab (Ind

ved in the PrPRC projecthieved Progrment DeflectiSeptember 2by Contractonce submittesures (MPM`easures (RDPPerformance....................asures (MPM

Measures (RDes of RUS&CS1 – Km 5.00S2 – Km 2.24S2 – Km 15.0S2 – Km 45.0S2 – Km 60.0S2 – Km 65.0S2 – Km 70.0S2 – Km 75.0S4 – Km 0.00S4 – Km 5.00S4 – Km 15.0S5 – Km 5.00S5 – Km 15.0B8 – Km 15.0B8 – Km 20.0B8 – Km 25.0al Performanntractor Caml Aspects onpplicable for p to Septemb(Up to Septeash Statistictract Agreem

ering Consultontract Agref Present at Sptember 201ptember 201........................................

dia)

oject ...............................ress ..............ons) ............2016 ............or for Non‐Coed by Contra`S) SubmittePM`S) – Subme Measures –....................M’s) ..............DPM’s) .........PM Measure0 to Km 11.34 to Km 10.00 to Km 20.000 to Km 50.00 to Km 65.00 to Km 70.00 to Km 75.0 to Km 80.0 to Km 5.00 .0 to Km 10.000 to Km 20.0 to Km 10.000 to Km 20.00 to Km 20.00 to Km 25.00 to Km 30.nce Indicatormp Site .........n Site ............project andber 2016) .....ember 2016s ..................ment and Prtant (PEC) ....eement/ PreSite ..............16) – Key Exp16) – Non Ke........................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................onformanceactor ............ed by Contramitted by Co– Submitted............................................................es ................300 ...............000 ...............00 ................00 ...............00 ...............00 ...............00 ...............00 ....................................00 .................00 ...............

00 .................000 ..............00 ................000 ..............000 .............rs as per .............................................. Camp site ......................) ......................................esent at Site....................esent at Site ....................perts ...........ey Experts ...........................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................es ......................................ctor .............ontractor ......d by Contract............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................e ...............................................................................................................................................................

8

.......... 14

.......... 17

.......... 19

.......... 25

.......... 26

.......... 46

.......... 47

.......... 47

.......... 47 tor ..... 48 .......... 49 .......... 50 .......... 50 .......... 53 .......... 54 .......... 55 .......... 56 .......... 57 .......... 58 .......... 59 .......... 60 .......... 61 .......... 62 .......... 63 .......... 64 .......... 65 .......... 66 .......... 67 .......... 68 .......... 69 .......... 82 .......... 84 .......... 84 .......... 86 .......... 91 .......... 91 .......... 97 ........ 105 ........ 105 ........ 106 ........ 107 ........ 109 ........ 109 ........ 112 ........ 114

TNM


1 PR

1.1

1.2

1.3

Progress

M TECHNOMANAG


ROJECTH

Significan

Monitoring

Leader, Yo

Septembe

Team and

The Monit

submitted

the Contra

The Monit

of August 2

PhysicalP

During th(LHS), kmkm 100.4

CrashRec

Total 8 crash

The total nusame time p

There were

Whereas S2 crashes and measures, e

While the tofatalities on

52.42

Improv

Progress



HIGHLIGH

ntEvents

g Consultant

ogendra Bhat

r 2016. Findi

Project Man

oring Consu

the non‐con

act Agreeme

oring Consu

2016 on 21 S

Progress

he month ofm 97.700 to k430 (RHS), km

cordUpdat

hes were rep

mber of crasprevious year

no fatal cras

Section con83.3% of all

especially in t

otal number OPRC Netwo

33.06

vement

a Bathinda Netwo

HTSFOR

t team, consi

tnagar, inspe

ings of their

nager on 16th

ltant conduc

nformance re

nt.

ltant submit

September 2

f Septemberkm 100.430 (m 101.050 to

e

ported on the

shes this year (87).

shes reported

stitutes 52.1 fatalities in the wake of

of crashes hork has risen

3.6

Rehab

4th Yea

ork in Punjab (Ind

THEMON

isting of Env

ected the OP

inspection wh September

cted the mon

eport on 10 S

ted Monthly

2016, in acco

r 2016, S2 ro(LHS), km 10o km 107.370

e network fo

ar (78) is dow

d in the mon

1% of OPRC Nthe 4th Year,ensuing wint

as come down sharply.

3.41

bilitation

ar Physical P

dia)

NTHOFS

ironmental E

PRC network

were discusse

2016.

nthly audit o

September 2

y Progress Re

ordance with

oad sections01.050 to km0 were impro

or reporting

wn by 9, com

nth of Septem

Network, it a, requiring soter/fog seaso

wn from prev

0

Res

Progress

SEPTEMB

Expert, Asha

and M/s PIP

ed with M/s

f the OPRC n

2016 to fulfil

eport (MPR)

the Contrac

s from km 9m 104.850 anoved.

month of Se

mpared to the

mber 2016.

accounted foome urgent ron.

vious year, t

0

urfacing

BER2016

Sharma and

PL’s camp site

PIPL Environ

network and

the require

no 23 for th

ct Agreemen

97.480 to kmd from km 9

ptember 201

e number of

or 80.8% of aroad safety

he number o

Targe

Achie

9

6

d Team

e on 15

nmental

ment of

e month

t.

m 97.570 96.700 to

16.

crashes

ll

of

et

eved

TNM


Sr. No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

To

Crashes

Fatalitie

M TECHNOMANAG


There has beof fatalities last year (8)

65% of crashvehicle – lea

Road Name

M

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

B8

otal

Dec Ja

s 5 6

s 0 0

135

1



een fatal crain the 4th Ye.

hes were attaving the car

OPRC N

Mar. 2013 toNov. 2013

5

59

3

2

6

6

81

Cra

n Feb M

6 12 9

0 10 1

23

39

11

23

2 3

Total C

a Bathinda Netwo

sh on OPRC ear stands at

ributed to spriageway.

Network Cra

o Dec. 201Nov.20

0

78

3

3

1

1

86

ashes 4th Yea

ar Apr M

9 8

1 2

5059

3240

4 5

Crashes

Third

ork in Punjab (Ind

network for t 18, which a

peeding and

ash Details (U

13 to 014

Dec.No

ar (Dec. 2015

May June

9 7

3 0

6368

4956

6 7

s This Ye

d Year

dia)

the last twore up by 10 c

overtaking.

Up to Septem

. 2014 to ov. 2015

7

71

9

4

1

6

98

5 to Nov. 20

July Aug

8 6

2 0

7481

6470

8 9

ear v Las

Fourth Year

o months; hocompared to

35% of crash

mber 2016)

Dec. 2015 toNov. 2016

7

63

2

1

3

2

78

016)

Sep O

8

0

8793

78

10 11

st Year

owever, totalo number of

hes were sin

o Total C

1

2

1

1

1

1

3

Oct Nov

98

12

10

l number deaths

gle

Crashes

19

71

17

10

11

15

43

Total

78

18

TNM


1.4

M TECHNOMANAG


Snapshot



s–Pictoria

Environ

MC a

a Bathinda Netwo

alOverview

mental Inspe

and M/s PIPL

ork in Punjab (Ind

w

ection Team

L Joint Inspec

dia)

m of MC and M

ction of Cam

M/s PIPL

p Site

11

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG




Minor Junc

Minor Junc

Minor Junc

a Bathinda Netwo

ction Improv

ction Improv

ction Improv

ork in Punjab (Ind

vement work

vement work

vement work

dia)

ks under pro

ks under pro

ks under pro

gress (S2)

gress (S2)

gress (S2)

12

TNM


2 PR

2.1

M TECHNOMANAG


ROJECTO

Backgrou

The Goverhas allottePatel InfraRajkot, foBathinda cdate on co

This contManagemMaintenanContractorroutine mpavement emergency

TechnologConsultingof the MoBoard, a sBoard ActConsultanc

The OrganFigure 2‐1



OVERVIEW

und

rnment of Pued the worksastructure Por 203.68 kmcontract areaompletion is 4

ract is an ent Contrance works or is responsiaintenance rehabilitatioy works.

gy and Mang Services Ltonitoring Constatutory bot, 1998 (Pucy services w

isation Chart.

F

a Bathinda Netwo

W

unjab (GOP)s for ImprovPvt. Ltd Patcms of its sta. The contr4th Decembe

Output anact) for Imf roads andble for the owork, desigon and impr

nagement Litd, India, wansultant (MCody establishnjab Act N

will be for a p

t of Output a

Figure 2‐1 : O

ork in Punjab (Ind

through Punvement, Rehacon House, tate road nact has starter 2022.

nd Performaprovement, allotted unoverall manan and constrovement wo

imited, Israes selected aC) on behalfhed under thNo. 22 of 1period of five

and Perform

OPRC Organ

dia)

njab Public Wabilitation a2nd Floor, K

network comted on 5th De

ance basedRehabilitat

nder Contracagement of ttruction of torks and the

el, in assocs the preferf of Punjab Rhe Punjab R1998). The e (5) years.

ance based

ization Char

Works Depand Routine MKotecha Chomprising ofecember 20

d Road Contion, Resurfct no. PSRSPthe networkthe requirede manageme

ciation with red bidder tRoads and BRoads and Binitial term

Road Contra

rt

artment, PWMaintenanceowk, Kalawathe Sangrur12 and the e

ntract (OPRfacing and P/WB/OPRC/k, including ad surfacing ent of any n

ICRA Manao undertakeBridges DeveBridges Deve

of the Mo

act is given in

13

WD (B&R) e to M/s ad Road, r‐Mansa‐expected

RC)(Asset Routine

/ICB. The all of the renewal, necessary

agement e the role elopment elopment onitoring

n

TNM


2.2

M TECHNOMANAG


Agencies

Agencies a

T

EMPLOYER

CLIENT

EMPLOYERREPRESENT

FUNDING A

MONITORICONSULTA

CONTRACT



Involvedin

nd key perso

Table 2‐1 : A

AGE

R

R’S TATIVE

AGENCY

ING ANT

TOR

a Bathinda Netwo

ntheOPRC

ons involved

Agencies and

ENCIES &KEY

PUNJABPROJEC

PUNJABDEVELO

CONSTR(B&R) ‐

INTERNDEVELO

TECHNOMANAGMANAGSERVICE

DATE M

DURATI

PATELINLTD

DURATI

START D

DATE O

END DA

VALUE O

ork in Punjab (Ind

Project

in OPRC pro

d Key Person

Y PERSONS IN

B STATE ROACT (PSRSP)

B ROADS ANDOPMENT BOA

RUCTION DIV‐ SANGRUR

ATIONAL BAOPMENT (IBR

OLOGYAND GEMENT LIMGEMENT CONES LIMITED

MOBILIZED O

ION OF CONT

NFRAESTRUC

ION

DATE

F SIGNING O

ATE

OF CONTRAC

dia)

oject are pre

ns involved i

NVOLVED IN

AD SECTOR

D BRIDGES ARD (PRBDB)

VISION PWD

ANK FOR RECRD)

MITED ‐ ICRA NSULTING

N

TRACT

CTURE PVT.

OF CONTRAC

CT SIGNED

sented in Ta

n the Projec

N THE PROJEC

Mr. YogChief En

)

Mr. YogProject Mr. AniDeputy

Mr. GurExecutivMr. PawSub Div

CONSTRUCTIO

Mr. HaiPresidenMr. YogTeam LeManage

Octobe

5 years

Mr. ArvManagiMr. MuRoad M

10 Year

Decemb

T Decemb

Decemb

INR 596

able 2‐1.

ct

CT

gesh Gupta ngineer‐ PSRS

gesh Gupta Director l Kumar ShaProject Dire

rmukh Singhve Engineer wan Kumar Gvisional Engin

ON AND

m Bonjack nt gendra Bhatneader/Projecer

r 7, 2014

vind Bhai V. Ping Director kesh Kumar

Manager

rs

ber 5, 2012

ber 10, 2012

ber 4, 2022

6.36 Crores

14

SP

rma ctor

Garg neer

nagar ct

Patel

2

TNM


2.3

2.4

2.5

M TECHNOMANAG


ContractA

Contract ad

Organisat

The appoRepresentOPRC proje

The ConsuConditionsof the Conpotential runder the

As a repreadministraperformedassessmen

Responsib

The Monito

Monitoring

Overall moachieving a

Evaluationconstructe

EvaluationThe Emplo



Administra

dministratio

tion&Resp

ointed Monative in impect.

ultant will rs of an Outpnsultant’s rorisk to the Emworks contr

sentative of ation of thed by the Contnt of the CE´s

bilitiesofth

oring Consul

g the perform

onitoring of tand maintain

n of the qualied and maint

n and recommoyer.

a Bathinda Netwo

ationChart

n chart is giv

Figure 2‐2

ponsibilitie

itoring Conlementing a

represent thut and Perfole is to provmployer by vact within th

the Employe Contract atracting Entits technical pe

heMonitor

ltant is respo

mance of the

the road conning the requ

ty and residutained by the

mendation o

ork in Punjab (Ind

ven in Figure

: Contract A

es–Monitor

nsultant isnd maintain

he Client asormance basvide timely averifying the he stipulated

er, the Monand for thety for the Civerformance.

ringConsul

onsible for:

e Contractor

nstruction beuired and de

ual life of roae Contractor

of designs pro

dia)

e 2‐2

Administratio

ringConsul

responsible ing an appro

s the Projeced Road Conand orderly achievemen

d time and bu

itoring Conse verificationvil Works. Th

tant

r, based on th

eing done by esigned level

ad pavemenr.

oposed by th

on Chart

ltant

for assistiopriate regim

ct Manager ntract. Accorrequired advnt of all contrudget.

ultant will bn of works he above inc

he approved

the Contracs of service.

t, presented

he Contracto

ing the Emme for mana

under the rdingly, the ovice to minimractual requ

e responsibland serviceludes the co

d Work Progr

ctor, based o

d, designed,

or for accepta

15

mployer’s aging the

General objective mize any irements

e for the es to be ntinuous

ram.

n

ance to

TNM


2.6

2.7

M TECHNOMANAG


Evaluationand Resett

Managing control of

Monitoringupdating s

The reviewapprovals

Review anusing tech

ProjectOr

Figure 2‐3Consultant

BasicCon

The OPRC The Contra



n and monitotlement & Re

the Quality Athe Contract

g, overall supsubmitted by

w of all technof the mont

d monitor thnology accep

rganization

3 shows the t and the rel

Figure 2‐3

ntractFeatu

methodologactor is paid

a Bathinda Netwo

oring of the pehabilitation

Assurance oftor.

pervision andy the Contrac

nical documehly billing pr

he process leptable to the

n

internal distationship wi

: Organizati

ures

gy optimisesd for output

ork in Punjab (Ind

performancen Plan by the

f the roads a

d recommenctor.

entation requesented by t

eading to thee Client.

tribution of th the Client

on Chart of

use of resouts, the main

dia)

e of EnvironmContractor.

and bridges a

ndation for a

uired for paythe Contract

e creation an

all membert and Contra

Monitoring

urces to provntenance ser

mental Impac

and monitori

cceptance o

yment and retor.

d updating o

rs of the stactor.

Consultant

vide maximarvice of ens

ct Managem

ing the quali

of data for inv

ecommendat

of the asset d

ff of the Mo

al “value for uring certain

16

ent Plan

ty

ventory

tions for

database

onitoring

money”. n quality

TNM


2.7.1

RoaCod

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

B8

Tota

M TECHNOMANAG


levels on managemehanding ov

1 Projec

AccoWor

Figu

The inte

ad de

N

1 Sangru

2 BhawanSH13 In(SH12A

3 Barnala

4 Mansa interse

5 Dhanau

8 BathindSabo (u(SH17)

l Length of c



the roads (ent of the faver the road

ctBrief

ording to thrk Contract a

ure 2‐4 : Ma

roads undrvention are

Table 2‐2

ame of Road

r ‐ Sunam (M

nigarh ‐ Sunantersection ‐A)

a ‐ Mansa: (S

–Talwandi Sction with B8

ula ‐ Bhikhi: (

da ‐ Kotshamup to interse

contract area

a Bathinda Netwo

(level of sercility and asin a certain

he Contractoare illustrate

ajor compon

der the OPe given in Tab

: Network R

d Section

MDR 21)

am ‐ Bhikhi ‐‐ Kotshamir:

SH13)

Sabo (up to 8): (ODR9)

(MDR 14)

mir–Talwandiction with S4

a (kms)

ork in Punjab (Ind

rvice) underssociated righquality to th

or’s Bidding d in Figure 2

nents of Civil

RC Contractble 2‐2 and i

Road Section

Classific

MD

‐ SH

SH

OD

MD

i 4):

SH

dia)

r contract aht of way due Client at th

Document,2‐4.

l Works unde

t and theirllustrated in

ns under OPR

cation Len(k

DR 1

H 10

H 7

DR 24

DR 25

H 28

203

and specific uring the conhe end of the

the major

er OPRC pro

r main featFigure 2‐5.

RC project

ngth km)

Ty

1.3 RehaResu

6.13 Impr(widResu

.29 RehaResu

4.97 Impr(widResu

5.34 RehaResu

8.65 RehaResu

3.68

improvementract periode contract pe

component

oject

tures and t

ype of interv

abilitation anurfacing

rovement Wening) and urfacing


rovement Wening) and urfacing



17

ents, the d and for eriod.

ts of the

types of

vention

nd

Works

nd

Works

nd

nd

OM

TNM TECMAN

OPRC World Bank ProjMonthly Progress Report N

HNOLOGY AND NAGEMENT LTD.

ect for Sangrur Mansa No 24 (September 2016)

Bathinda Network in PPunjab (India)

Figu

ure 2‐5 : OPRC N

18

Network Map

8

TNM


3 W

3.1

YEAR AC

1 (2013)

2 (2014)

3 (2015)

4 (2016) (Balance of 3

rd

year)

5 (2017)

6 (2018)

7 (2019)

8 (2020)

9 (2021)

10 (2022)

Contract Total (km)

1

*Exclper C

M TECHNOMANAG


ORKPRO

Improvem

The detailsas per the the achievshown.

The achievthe table.

It should bPIPL) from2014.

The progrework progeffect on tthe contra

As per ontract

As ApprWo

Progra

27.20 27.20

47.60 24.9735.84

54.10 40.87

0.00 52

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

128.90

uding the ROontract Agree



OGRESS‐

ment,Rehab

s of the appcontract for

ved targets a

ved progress

be noted that December 2

ess of works gramme) wathe efficiencyct.

Table 3‐1 :

IMPROVEMENT

per roved ork amme

0 (S2)

(S4) & (S2)

7 (S2) 21.100

.42

2.52

105

B length. As pement the RO

a Bathinda Netwo

SUMMAR

bilitationa

roved work r the remainat the end o

s during the

t the summa2012, prior t

in the seconas appreciaby and effect

Work Progra

Achieved (kms)

25.91(S2)

24.44 (S4)

(S2) & 0.530 (S4

6.00 (S2) 7.85 (S2) 5.900 (S2) 13.31 (S2) 2 (S2) RHS only

.04 (improved length)

per site the RB length is 40

ork in Punjab (Ind

RYANDC

andResurfa

programs foning time (6of the first ye

fourth year

ary includes to the mobil

nd year as wbly behind sciveness of ro

am Approve

As per Contract

0.00

7.29

) 0.00

25.34

5.05

2.20

34.90

0.00

0.00

0.00

74.78

OB deck slab 00m.

dia)

COMMEN

acingWork

or the first foyears) are sear, second

r (balance w

the works caization of M

ell as in the tchedule. Thoad network

ed vs. Achiev

REHABILITAT

As per ApproveWork Programm

25.34 (S5)

11.30 (S1)

7.29 (S3) & 2.20

3.6

49.73

length is 590

NTS

ks

our years anummarised year and th

work of 3rd ye

arried out byMonitoring Co

third year (ehis delay mak operations

ved Progress

ION

ed me

Achieve

25.34 (S5

0.00

(S2) 11.125 (S

3.41*

39.875

0m which is no

nd the work in Table 3‐1e third year

ear) is also s

y the contraconsultant in

extension of ay have detover the du

d As per Contract

5) 34.20

0.00

1) 0.00

11.30

23.60

10.20

0.00

56.00

68.30

0.00

203.60

ot rehabilitate

19

program . Further are also

shown in

ctor (M/s October,

2nd year trimental ration of

RESURFACING

As per Approved Work

Programme

0.00

0.00

28.65

28.65

ed. But as

Achieved

0.00

28.65 (B8)

0.00

28.65

TNM


*ROBAgree

3.1.1

M TECHNOMANAG


B length excluement.

1 Works

In tapp(i) Fi.e. imp

WitConBhi

0

Progress

52.42

Impro

Progress



Figure 3‐

uded actually

Figure

sDone‐Fir

the first yeaproved workFrom km 2.2in village G

provement w

th regard tontractor fulfkhi (S5) (leng

128.9105.

Improvemen

Ov

2

33.06

ovement

a Bathinda Netwo

1 : Overall W

y as per site

e 3‐2 : 4th Y

stYear

ar of contrack program. It40 to km 18harachon (iiworks in the f

o the rehabifilled the regth of 25.34

.04

nt R

verall Work

3.6

Reha

4th Ye

ork in Punjab (Ind

Work Progre

is 590m agai

Year Works (

ct, the Contt complied w.150 (except) from km 6first year.

litation worehabilitation 0 km).

74.78

39.87

Rehabilitation

Progress (P

6 3.41*

abilitation

ear Physical P

dia)

ess (Physical

inst the less

Physical Pro

ractor fulfillwith the imprt the road se7.840 to km

rks as per thpertaining

20

n R

Physical Prog

0

Re

Progress

Progress)

ROB length 4

ogress)

ed the requrovement of ction from k

m 79.000. For

he approvedto the road

03.6

28.65

Resurfacing

gress)

0

surfacing

400m as per

uirements asf road sectiokm 8.400 to kr a total of 2

d work progd section Dh

Tar

Ach

Targ

Ach

20

r Contract

s per the ns S2 i.e. km 9.400 26.07 km

ram, the hanaula–

rget

hieved

get

ieved

TNM


3.1.2

3.1.3

3.1.4

M TECHNOMANAG


2 Works

Imp201thethekmclea

Reh2ndythicDis

ReskmwoconAftreh

Duesec

3 WorkD

Duesec(PSsubbalCon0.0Jun

TheyeaS1)

Thepav67.

4 Works

TheexeThewoEmare

As the



sDone‐Sec

provement w14 as per the road lengthe work on the 79.000 andarance of for

habilitation wyear (2014),ckness of thpute Review

surfacing wo37.850). Howrks executensidered as rer the 15thhabilitation o

e to the abovctions (S1 and

Done‐Thir

e to the dection, the 2nd

RSP) approbmitted the ance works ntractor was0 to km 11.3ne, 2015 resp

e balance woar. The Empl and up to05

e works forvement of S840 were co

sUnder‐Fo

e Contractoecuted in these works arrk programmployer for ae to be impro

per the appe 4th year of t

a Bathinda Netwo

condYear

works of 47he approvedh of 24.44 kme other roadd km 108.77rest land.

work for the however thhe pavemenw Board (DRB

ork in the 2wever, the Cd from km rehabilitationh DRB meeof B8 road, th

ve reasons, td S2) in the s

rdYear

esign disputedyear work pved it as revised worfor accepta

s started the300) on 29thpectively.

orks of S1 anloyer was gr5th Dec, 2015

r 3rd year S2 road fromompleted. Th

ourthYear

r had subme 4th year ore to be execme has beenpproval. Undoved and 3.6

proved work the contract

ork in Punjab (Ind

7.60 km werwork progr

m correspondd sections i.e70 (total 29.7

road length he work did nt overlay. TB).

2ndyear wasContractor h9.200 to kn or resurfacting the dehe resurfacin

the Contractsecond year.

e of S1 roaprogramme extension ork programmance of the e rehabilitatih May, 2015

nd S2, schedranted the t5 (for S2) res

(2nd year bm km 45.200he completio

Programm

mitted the rof the contrcuted in the n accepted byder the 4th y km road len

programme

dia)

re planned tramme. Howding to Sectioe. S2 betwee77 km on ro

of 11.3 km fnot commeThe Contrac

completed had raised thm 15.000 scing. The casecision was ng would be

tor did not fu.

d and non‐was shiftedof 2nd year me in June, Monitoringon and imprand S2 (from

uled in the 2ime extensiopectively.

balance wor0 to km 54.0on of minor w

e

revised 3rd ract)for the 4th year of ty the Projecyear work prongths are to b

e the followi

to be compwever, the Con S4 and wen km 32.000oad section

for S1 sectionce due to tctor forward

in the Seche dispute reection, whese has been conveyed tconsidered.

ulfil the work

clearance o to 3rd yearwork prog

2015 to comg Consultantrovement wm km 45.20 t

2nd year, weon up to 15

rks), the im000 and froworks is still i

year work acceptancethe contractt Manager aogramme 52be rehabilita

ing works ar

leted by NoContractor im

was unable to0 and km 67S2) due to t

n was plannthe dispute ded the case

tion B8 (kmegarding theether this shreferred to that the ins

k programme

f forest on r and Chief gramme. Complete the 2t and the Eorks on S1 (to km 67.84)

ere shifted inth August, 2

mprovement m km 55.70in progress.

programmeof Project M. The revisedand forwarde2.42 km roadated.

re to be exe

21

ovember, mproved o execute .840 and the non‐

ed in the over the e to the

m9.200 –e type of hould be the DRB. stead of

e of road

S2 road Engineer ontractor 2nd year mployer. from km ) 0n 03rd

n the 3rd 2015 (for

of road 00 to km

e (to be Manager. d 3rd year ed to the d lengths

ecuted in

TNM


3.1.5

3.1.6

M TECHNOMANAG


Improv

Km 8.40

Km 18.

Km 28.5

Km 40.7

Km 79.

Total Le

Rehabi

Km 24.6

Km 26.4

Km 27.6

Total Le

5 WorkP

Durto k

Dursec

Durfro

Durkm

Durkm

Dur95.97.

Dur97.km

6 Change

Undhad Brid



vement of Bh

00 to km 9.4

150 to km 24

500 to km 39

700 to km 45

150 to km 10

ength (kms)

litation of Su

6 to km 26.4

400 to km 27

600 to km 28

ength (kms)

Progress‐F

ring the monkm 24.400 w

ring the moction from km

ring the monm km 79.000

ring the mon 34.500.

ring the mon 89.500 to km

ring the mo300 (RHS), 700(LHS) we

ring the mo570 (LHS), k 96.700 to km

einPropos

der Section Vapproved th

dge Widening

a Bathinda Netwo

hawanigarh‐

4000

4.5,00

9.300

5.200

08.770

unam portio

400 (less ROB

7.60 (initially

8.600

FourthYea

nth of Marchwas complete

onth of Aprim 24.400 to k

nth of May 0 to km 83.5

nth of June 2

nth of July 20m 95.010 (LH

onth of Augufrom km 9

ere improved

onth of Septm 97.700 tom 100.430 (R

sal:

VII – General he variations

g:

ork in Punjab (Ind

‐Sunam‐Bhik

on S2 road

B 400m)

y included as

rProgramm

h 2016, the ed.

l, 2016, bitukm 28.600 (l

2016, the bi70 and from

2016, 5.9 km

016, 5.510 kmHS) was com

ust 2016, S295.010 to kd.

tember 2016o km 100.430RHS), km 101

Conditions, s for:

dia)

khi‐Kotsham

s improveme

me

bituminous w

uminous woess the ROB

ituminous wm km 86.200 t

of S2 road w

m (LHS) bitumpleted.

2 road sectikm 95.280

6, S2 road s0 (LHS), km 11.050 to km

Clause 63, C

mir Road (S2)

1

6

1

4

2

5

1

ent work) 1

1

3

work of S2 r

ork for rehab) was compl

work for imprto km 89.500

was improve

minous work

ons i.e. from(LHS) and f

sections from101.050 to k107.370 wer

Change in Pro

1.0 km

6.35 km

10.8 km

4.5 km

29.77km

52.42

1.4 km

1.2 km

1.0km

3.6

road from km

bilitation of eted.

rovement of0 was compl

ed from km 2

k of S2 road

m km 89.50from 96.700

m km 97.48km 104.850 are improved

oposal, Empl

22

m 18.400

S2 road

f S2 road eted.

28.600 to

between

00 to km 0 to km

80 to km and from .

oyer

TNM


3.2 Ro

3.2.1

M TECHNOMANAG


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

4‐La

1.

2.

3.

4.

oadDurabi

1 Rough

Concolle

In ththe



Widening of

Drain crossin

Widening o

Branch Cana

road (S2).

Widening of

Drain crossin

Widening o

Branch Can

73+450 (ske

Widening/re

14.50m each

Widening of

Bhawanigar

Widening of

Canal Bhaw

20°) in Distr

anning of Ro

For 4‐lannin

Town from C

For 4‐lannin

Town from C

For 4‐lannin

from Ch 84+

For 4‐laning

ility’sOverv

hness

tractor has pect the rough

he month of following ro

a Bathinda Netwo

f existing bri

ng Bhawanig

f existing br

al at RD 54+0

f existing bri

ng Bathinda‐

f existing br

al crossing

ew in 250)

eplacement

h & 1 Span 1

f Existing Br

h –Sunam‐B

f Existing Br

anigarh – Su

ict Mansa.

ad sections:

ng road of Bh

Ch 54+030 to

ng of Bhaw

Ch 39+300 to

ng of Bhawan

+030 to Ch 86

of Barnala –

view

procured thehness (IRI) d

June and Juad sections:

ork in Punjab (Ind

dge at Ch. 1

garh‐Sunam‐

ridge 2 span

040 (Skew in

dge at RD 20

‐Kotshamir‐T

ridge 3 span

Bhawanigar

of Existing B

13m) on Sang

idge 5 Span

hikhi‐Kotsha

ridge 3 Span

unam‐ Bhikh

hawanigarh‐S

o Ch 55+700

anigarh‐Sun

o Ch 40+700

nigarh‐Sunam

6+060.

– Mansa Roa

e Profilometata of the OP

uly 2016, Con

dia)

00+700 (5x9

‐Bhikhi‐Kotsh

n 3.50m clea

n 250) Bhawa

0+600 (6 spa

Talwandi Sab

n 3.00m clea

rh‐Sunam‐Bh

Bridge 5 spa

grur‐Sunam

6.10m c/c o

amir roat (S2

n 3.00m clea

i‐Kotshamir

Sunam‐Bhikh

0.

am‐Bhikhi‐K

0.

m‐Bhikhi‐Kot

d (S3) from

ter in the moPRC network

ntractor has

9.5m each cl

hamir road (S

ar & 3.60m

anigarh‐Suna

an 8.70 m ea

bo road (B8)

ar & 3.60m

hikhi‐Kotsham

an (2 Span 1

Road (S1) at

over Bhadah

) at RD 53+4

ar & 3.60m e

roat (S2) at

hi‐Kotshamir

otshamir Ro

tshamir Roa

Km 182+640

onth of Junek roads.

collected th

ear span) ov

S2).

each c/c ov

am‐Bhikhi‐Ko

ach clear) ov

each c/c ov

mir road (S2

13.50m each

RD 10+200.

hur Singh Wa

400 in Distric

each c/c ove

RD 69+800

r Road (S2) i

oad (S2) in

d (S2) in Ma

0 to 189+970

2016 and st

e roughness

23

ver Lisara

ver Kotla

otshamir

ver Lisara

ver Kotla

2) at RD

h, 2 Span

ala Drain

t Mansa.

er Bhaini

(shew in

n Bhikihi

Cheema

aur Town

0

tarted to

s data for

TNM


RoadSectioNo.

S2

S1

S2

S4

S5

B8

3.2.2

M TECHNOMANAG


d on

Road S

BhawaBhikhi

Sangru

BhawaBhikhi

Mansa

Dhana

Bathin

ConprocConfromat threqufulfi

Durithis this

2 Structu

The of Mi.e. IRC

The (fromto 7(frombeca

The com95thcurv



Section Nam

anigarh‐Suna‐Kotshamir

ur Sunam

anigarh‐Suna‐Kotshamir

a Talwandi Sa

aulaBhikhi

nda Talwandi

tractor has cess the colsultant (MC)m M/s PIPL tohe OPRC siteuired softwall the contra

ing the 17th issue to suprequiremen

uralCapaci

pavement dMonitoring Co(S1&S2 for 1115: 2014 al

pavement dm km 0.000 79.000) for im km 0.000ause this is a

pavement mplying with h percentilevature confir

a Bathinda Netwo

e

am‐

am‐

abo

iSabo

procured thlected roug) has alreadyo arrange the but till datare, the IRI dctual require

World Bankpply the softt.

ityData(Pa

deflections wonsultant wi100 MSA, S4ong the inne

deflection dato km 25.34inner and o0 to km 25.3an intermedi

deflections the requirem

e value of rmed as show

ork in Punjab (Ind

Ro

From (km)

24.400

27.200

79.000

86.200

0.000

2.240

18.400

45.200

55.700

68.000

0.000

0.000

9.200

e profilomethness data y conveyed the software ute Contractodata cannot ements.

k Implementtware at site

avementDe

were recordeith FWD for t4 & S5 for 50er (LHS & RH

ata was colle40), S2 (fromuter wheel 340); the daate lane road

data for tments of Clapavement cwn in the Tab

dia)

oad Section

To

26

28

83

89

11.300 (eCh 2+9403+085)

18

24

54

67

79

24

24.800 (eportion f24.800 to25.340)

37

ter at OPRC has not beeto the Contrused to procr fails to do be verified b

ation Missioe but till date

eflections)

ed by Contacthe improve0 MSA) for eHS) and the o

cted for S1 ( km 2.240 topaths (left ata was colled.

the above ause 8.2.3 ofcharacteristible 3‐2.

o (km)

6.400

8.530

3.560

9.500

except from 0 to Ch

8.150

4.400

4.000

7.800

9.000

4.970

except city from km o km

7.850

project site en arrangedactor/emploess the collethe same. Inby the Moni

on, Monitorie the Contra

ctor (PIPL) ud and rehabeach traffic louter (LHS &

from km 0.0o km 18.150 and right sidected for ou

mentioned f the contracc deflection

Rema

Data collJune 2016

Data collJuly 2016

Data collJuly 2016

Data collJuly 2016

Data collJuly 2016

Data collJuly 2016

but the sofd at site. Mooyer the requected roughnn the absencitoring Cons

ng Consultaactor has not

nder the supilitated roadloading grouRHS) wheel

000 to km 11and from kmde lanes) anuter wheel p

roads sectct agreemenn and chara

24

arks

ected in 6 end

ected in

ected in end

ected in end

ected in end

ected in end.

ftware to onitoring uirement ness data ce of the ultant to

nt raised t fulfilled

pervision sections up as per paths.

1.300), S4 m 68.000 nd for S5 path only

ions are nt i.e. the acteristic

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


The km MonAgrechar

Pavement lo

Group 2 (S4,S5,B8)

Group 3 RoaS2, S3)

The colle

DuriS2 r

Durithe to k

S

S



FWD data o54+000 andnitoring Coeement. Theracteristic cu

Table 3‐2 : S

oading categ

Roads 50

ads 100 msa

FWD data ected during

ing the monoad from km

ing the monroad sectionm 89.500. Th

From

1 78+9

2 79+0

3 80+0

4 81+0

5 82+0

6 83+0

From

1 78+9

2 79+0

3 80+0

4 81+0

5 82+0

6 83+0

l No.

l No.

a Bathinda Netwo

on the newly from km 55nsultant ane 95th percurvature conf

Structural Ca

ory MaxiCent

msa < 0.8

a (S1, < 0.8

for road seg the month o

th of June 2m 18.400 to k

nth of June 2ns of S2 roadhe results fo

m To

900 79+000

020 80+000

020 81+000

020 82+000

020 83+000

020 83+560

m To

900 79+000

020 80+000

020 81+000

020 82+000

020 83+000

020 83+560

Chainage

Chainage

ork in Punjab (Ind

constructed5+700 to kmnd analysedentile valuefirmed as me

apacity Data

imum Cral Deflectio

80

80

ection of S2of May 2016

2016, the FWkm 24.400.

2016, the FWd i.e. from kr the above

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

0 RHS 0

Oute

Side

Inne

9

Perc

Value

Side 9

Perc

Value

dia)

d road sectiom 67+850 wd as per t of pavemeentioned in t

a (Pavement

Characteristicon D0 (mm)

2 road from6.

WD data was

WD data waskm 78.500 tomentioned s

0.66 0

0.65 0

0.61 0

0.65 0

0.62 0

0.54 0

0.63 0

0.69 0

0.65 0

0.6 0

0.6 0

0.53 0

er Wheel Path

Ave

Defle

(m

er Wheel Path

5th

centile

e (mm)

5th

centile

e (mm)

Ave

Defle

(m

ns of S2 roadwas collectethe requireent charactethe Table 3‐2

Deflections)

c MinimumCurvatur

< 0.1

<0.1

km 18.400

analysed fo

s also collecto km 83.560 sections are

.08 LHS

.07 LHS

.07 LHS

.07 LHS

.08 LHS

.07 LHS

.08 LHS

.06 LHS

.07 LHS

.07 LHS

.07 LHS

.07 LHS

erage

ection

mm)

Side

Sideerage

ection

mm)

d from km 4d in the preements of ristic deflec2.

)

m Charae D0‐D200 (m

0 to km 24.

r the road se

ted and anaand from kmsummarized

0.54

0.65

0.59

0.65

0.6

0.62

0.44

0.65

0.64

0.69

0.63

0.61

95th

Percentile

Value (mm)

95th

Percentile

Value (mm)

25

5+200 to esence of Contract tion and

acteristic mm)

400 was

ection of

lysed for m 86.200 d below:

0.08

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.08

0.07

0.06

0.07

0.08

Average

Deflection

(mm)

Average

Deflection

(mm)

TNM


3.3

Sl. No.

1 S

2 B(S

3 MR

4 D

5 BIn

M TECHNOMANAG


No mor

NetworkP

To fulfil thfor the mo

The audit Consultantsections.

angrur ‐ Sun

BhawanigarhS2)

Mansa‐TalwaRamtirathjaga

Dhanaula‐Bhi

Bathinda‐Kotntersection w

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

Sl No

Sl No



re FWD data

Performan

e requirementh Septemb

details ant against eac

Table 3‐3 : A

Name of

nam Road (S1

‐Sunam‐Bhik

andi Saboa (S4)

ikhi Road (S5

shamir‐Talwwith S4

From

86+200

87+020

88+020

89+020

From

86+200

87+020

88+020

89+020

o. Cha

o. Cha

a Bathinda Netwo

a has been co

nceWorks’O

ent of the Cober, 2016 ar

nd summarych RUS&CPM

Audit Section

f Road

1)

khi‐Kotsham

o Road

5)

wandi Sabo

Total Audit

To

87+000

88+000

89+000

89+500

To

87+000

88+000

89+000

89+500

inage

inage

ork in Punjab (Ind

ollected duri

Overview

ontract Agree summarise

y of non‐coM, MPM and

ns for the M

ir Road

Up to

Road upto

t Length (km

RHS

RHS

RHS

RHS

RHS

RHS

RHS

RHS

Oute

Side 9

Per

Valu

Inne

Side 9

Per

Valu

dia)

ng the mont

eement, the ed below in T

onformancesd RDPM are

onth of Sept

Section Code

S112

S211

S213

S219

S222

S223

S224

S225

S411

S412

S414

S512

S514

B812

B813

B814

ms)

0.51 0

0.60 0

0.62 0

0.52 0

0.51 0

0.59 0

0.56 0

0.6 0

er Wheel Path

95th

rcentile

ue (mm)

Ave

Defl

(m

er Wheel Path

95th

rcentile

ue (mm)

Ave

Defl

(m

th of Septem

randomly seTable 3‐3:

s adjusted explained i

tember 2016

Cha(from km

5.000 t

2.240 t

15.000 t

45.000 t

60.000 t

65.000 t

70.000 t

75.000 t

0.000 t

5.000 t

15.000

5.000 t

15.000 t

15.000 t

20.000 t

25.000

0.07 LHS

0.07 LHS

0.07 LHS

0.07 LHS

0.07 LHS

0.06 LHS

0.07 LHS

0.06 LHS

h

erage

ection

mm)

Sid

erage

ection

mm)

Sid

mber 2016.

elected audit

by the Mon the follow

6

inage m ‐ to km)

o 11.300

to 10.000

to 20.000

to 50.000

to 65.000

to 70.000

to 75.000

to 80.000

to 5.000

to 10.000

to 20.000

o 10.000

to 20.000

to 20.000

to 25.000

to 30.000

S 0.63

S 0.61

S 0.57

S 0.58

S 0.56

S 0.59

S 0.57

S 0.56

e 95th

Percent

Value (m

e 95th

Percent

Value (m

26

t lengths

onitoring wing sub‐

Length (kms)

6.300

7.760

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

5.000

84.06

3 0.07

1 0.07

7 0.07

8 0.07

6 0.07

9 0.06

7 0.06

6 0.06

h

tile

mm)

Averag

Deflecti

(mm)

h

tile

mm)

Averag

Deflecti

(mm)

ge

on

)

ge

on

)

TNM


3.3.1

3.3.2

M TECHNOMANAG


1 Pavem

During were mfew loca

On

obs

The

Figure 3

2 Unseal

Thesho

ThefromobsConexpreq

On was

As shoEmpconthe

Conmatshosholocaloosinco



mentMainte

the audit inmaintained asations in som

S2 road, berved.

e deficiencies

S2: (km 75 to

3‐3 : Rutting

ledShoulde

e improvemeulders on all

e extra soil atm the edges erved at sontractor has edite the wuired ratio a

S5 road, bets observed.

intimated bpkeepers anployers interducted withdrainage sys

ntactor also terial in 80/2ulders. Monuld be mixeation insteadse milled monvenience t

a Bathinda Netwo

enance(RU

nspection fos per the reme of the aud

between km

s recorded u

o km 80)

and Shoving

erMainten

ent was obl road section

t the edge oto facilitateme of the astarted to rork and finiss per the cro

tween km 15It is very mu

by the Contnd the villarvention is r the villagersstem of the r

maintaining20 ratio. Thisnitoring Coned with soil d of directly material obto the road u

ork in Punjab (Ind

US&CPM‐1)

or the monthquired leveldit section as

78.000 to

nder RUS&C

g at Paveme

ance(RUS&

served to mns.

of the shoulde the drainagaudit sectionremove the sh the slopeoss‐sections.

5.000 to km ch required

tractor in hagers were equired. Thrs and ‘Gram road section

the unseales shows the gsultant adviin the propmixing at siserved on users.

dia)

h of Septem of service. s summarise

km 79.000

CPM‐1 are pr

ent observed

&CPM‐2)

maintain the

ders was obsge. The erosns but rectifexcess soil fes of the sho

20.000, theto maintain

his own audopposed torough LRC, tPanchayat’ss.

ed shouldergood results ce the Contposed rationite. At site itthe carriag

mber 2016, aThe deficien

ed below:

0, the ruttin

resented in F

S2: (km 7

d on S2 Road

e service lev

served whichion of shoulfied by the from the shoulders and

e low shouldthe shoulde

dit that at o maintain the consultats’ to find out

s by mixing for the maintractor that n at the camt cannot be geway whic

all the audit ncy was obs

ng and shov

Figure 3.3

75 to km 80)

d Section

vel of the u

h should be ders due to Contractor oulders but embankmen

er and reverrs on regular

some locatthe shouldtion may net the way to

the soil witntenance of uthe milling

mp site or amixed propch may cre

27

sections served at

ving was

unsealed

removed rain was on time. need to nt in the

rse slope r basis.

ions the ers. The eed to be maintain

th milled unsealed material ny other erly. The eate the

TNM


3.3.3

M TECHNOMANAG


Thenorlocastarsign

The

S5: (km

Fi

3 Draina

Mosfromfewthe maithe

At sCongun

On the



e road sectiomal such as ations the shrted to mainn of mainten

e deficiencies

m 15 to km

gure 3‐4 : Lo

ageMainten

st of the culm debris. New locations th

parapets wintain/restorquality of Ha

some culvertntractor has nny bags. Thi

S5 road, betwaterway w

a Bathinda Netwo

ns where ththe locationhoulders be ntain the aboance which n

s recorded u

20)

S5: (

ow shoulder

nance(RUS

lvert drains ed to maintahe hazard mwas missingre the reflecazard marke

t locations tstarted to s exercise sh

tween km 0.0was not clear

ork in Punjab (Ind

he wear and ns near dhamaintained

ove mentionneeds to con

nder RUS&C

(km 15 to km

and reverse

S&CPM‐3)

under this main the emba

marker wereg/damaged. ting tapes, ders.

he erosion arectify the ehould be con

000 to km 5..

dia)

tear of the bas, schools on regular ned locationsntinue.

CPM 2 are pr

S5

m 20)

e slope on S5

month audit ankment adjfound damaThe imme

delineators o

adjacent to teroded locaducted on re

.000, some o

unsealed sho and petrol basis. Nows on regular

resented in F

: (km 15 to

5 Road Sectio

sections wejacent to theaged and thediate attenton the parap

the parapetstions by puegular basis.

of the culver

oulders is mpumps etc.

w the Contrabasis. This i

Figure 3.4

km 20)

on

ere cleaned e culvert parae reflective ttion is reqpets and to

s was also otting the sa

rts were choc

28

ore than at these

actor has s a good

and free apets. At tapes on uired to maintain

observed. and filled

cked and

TNM


3.3.4

3.3.5

3.3.6

3.3.7

M TECHNOMANAG


Conand

In bthe villa

In Bactithe maicooadjawith

Thebe ssolurecoConland

4 Routin

Theand

All locaobs

No

Themonto m

5 Obstru

The of tposs

At sand to st

No

6 Incide

Conememajo

7 Vegeta

On veg

Conmai



ntractor has d the work is

built up areahigher leve

agers oppose

Built‐up areavities, the CRoW corri

intenance wperatively wacent landowhin Built‐up z

e impact of isevere and tutions for adognizes the ntractor anddowner issue

neMaintena

e bridges andd free from d

the bridgesations whererved.

damage of t

e median manthly audit imaintain.

uctiononth

unauthorizethe road secsible.

some locatioin RoW by ttop this type

obstruction

ntRespons

tractor has ergency toll for incident w

ationContr

S5 road sectetation was

ntractor haintain/contro

a Bathinda Netwo

started to jogoing on in f

a, the water l of surrouned the activit

s where othContractor shdor and wi

work that exwith the Emwners to seezones.

nadequate dthe Contractddressing thdifficulties

d the Empes that may b

anceofBrid

d the other sebris.

s and otherre the una

he structure

rkers were it was observ

hePavemen

ed stockpilingctions. Whe

ons the wastthe local pube of activities

was found o

seandEme

deputed thfree contractwas recorded

ol(RUS&CP

tion, betweeobserved on

s arrangedol the vegeta

ork in Punjab (Ind

oin the catcfull swing.

stagnation ding groundties to maint

hers may be hall be respoill inform thxtends beyomployer, otheek the best

drainage on tor is requirehese deficieinvolved inloyer shall be an imped

dgesandO

structures in

r structures uthorised a

s was observ

installed on ved some of

ntSurfacea

g of materiaere possible

te constructblic who needs.

on the pavem

rgencyWor

he highway t numbers od during the

PM‐7)

n km 0 to kmn the shoulde

d the manation on the

dia)

hpits to all t

was observed. Contractortain the drain

responsible onsible for ahe Project ond the correr communsolutions fo

the pavemeed to give pncies as a pn implemenwork coopiment to ach

therStruct

n this month

were cleanadvertisemen

ved and reco

the footpathf the marker

andShould

ls along therequest the

ion materiad to monitor

ment surface

rksRespon

patrolling n each netwmonth.

m 5, km 15 toer having he

nual and shoulders.

the culverts

ed along ther has alreadnage.

for some drall drainage Manager ofridor. The City organisator addressing

ent within tharticular attpriority. Hownting these peratively thieving these

tures(RUS&

h audit sectio

n and clear nts and wr

orded during

hs of the Mars were miss

ers(RUS&C

shoulders we owner to

l was dumpr on regular

during audit

nse(RUS&C

vehicles anwork road at s

o km 16 andight more th

mechanical

where it is

e carriageway intimated

rainage mainmaintenancf the need Contractor wtions (e.g. Lg drainage p

he Built‐up zoention to idwever the Eimproveme

to resolve e improveme

&CPM–4)

ons were ma

except froritten mate

g the monthly

ansa ROB. Dusing which m

CPM‐5)

was observedremove as

ed on the sbasis and fo

t visit.

CPM‐6)

d also dispsuitable inte

km 16 to kmhan 100mm.

grass cut

29

required

y due to that the

ntenance ce within for any

will work LRC) and problems

ones can entifying Employer nts. The adjacent ents.

aintained

m some rial was

y audit.

uring the may need

d in some soon as

houlders rce them

plays the rvals. No

m 17, the

tters to

TNM


3.3.8

M TECHNOMANAG


At sposregu

Thevegconwithloca

Thecut zon

Conbranfrom

The

S5: (k

S5: (k

8 RoadS

Thesect



some locatiots etc. wereular basis an

e Contractor etation thattrol or simihin the subation, area/n

e road‐side tthe vegetate” as per the

ntractor mennches of them the forest

e deficiencies

km 5 to km 1

m 15 to km 2

Figure 3‐5

SignsMaint

e `deficiency tions. On S4

a Bathinda Netwo

ons the km e not visible d make the s

shall also idet have beenlar purposebsequent mnumber and c

rees obstruction and cleae contract ag

ntioned that e trees. Interdepartment

s recorded u

10)

20)

5 : Vegetatio

tenance(RU

to maintain road the sig

ork in Punjab (Ind

stones, hecdue the grasite hazard f

entify any arn planted fos within theonthly repocause of the

ct the visibilar up to 6m greement.

the forest drvention of Et.

nder RUS&C

on on should

US&CPM‐8)

the sign boan boards we

dia)

ctometre stoass. The vegfree.

rea of dead aor amenity, e RoW and ort. This infvegetation d

ity of the sigvertically fr

epartment wEmployer is

CPM 7 are pre

S5

S5

ers at S5 Ro

)

ards and posere not as pe

ones, culvergetation shou

and dying trelandscapingreport to tformation cdying.

gn boards, gom ground

was not allowrequired to

esented in F

5: (km 15 to k

5: (km 15 to k

ad Section

t was observr IRC standa

rt parapets uld be contr

ees, shrubs og, screening,he Project learly ident

gantries etc. the “vegeta

wing them toseek the pe

igure 3.5.

km 20)

km 20)

ved on differrd.

30

and sign rolled on

or similar , erosion Manager ifies the

Need to tion free

o cut the ermission

rent road

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


Momucthe the loca

Thecorr93–

Theroad

Theconholl

Somstan

At fsho

The

S4: (



ost of the roach required visibility. Ascushion at

ations.

e Contractoresponding t–1985 and IR

e steel sectiods should be

e traffic signsfirming to ISow section c

me of the signdards. Thes

few locationuld be replac

e deficiencies

km 0 to km 5

a Bathinda Netwo

o At km IRC: 67

o At km sides.

o Schoolo At km

ad side gantto paste the per the instthe gantry

r should mto location dC 67–2012.

on used for se compatible

s should be mS: 1239, rectconfirming to

gn boards anse sign board

ns the speedced with the

s recorded u

5)

ork in Punjab (Ind

0.100, RHS, 7‐2012. 1.600, the sp

sign was no2.010, speed

tries existede reflective ttruction of Wposts. The

maintain thedetails of eac

sign posts ine to IRC: 67‐2

mounted onangular holloo IS: 3589.

nd sign postsds and posts

d signs are ne suitable spe

nder RUS&C

dia)

the Major R

peed breake

ot as per IRC:d breaker sig

in the audit tape on the

World Bank tecushion sh

e sign detch sign in ac

stalled on th2012 and MO

the supportow sections

s are substanshould be re

not as per theed signs.

CPM 8 are pre

S

Road Ahead S

er sign was n

67‐2012. gn was not sa

sections wepost of the eam during thould be pro

ails along cordance wi

he new imprORT&H speci

t posts whicconfirming t

ndard and neplaced at th

he State Gov

esented in F

S4: (km 0 to k

Sign not as p

not the same

ame on both

ere painted. gantries to their visits toovided at a

with the dith the stand

roved / rehafications.

h may be of to IS: 4923 o

ot compatibhe earliest.

vt. Guideline

igure 3.6.

km 5)

31

er

e on both

sides.

It is very improve

o provide ll gantry

drawings dards IRC

abilitated

f GI pipes or square

ble to IRC

es. These

TNM


3.3.9

M TECHNOMANAG


S4: (

9 Raised

As pshoIRC:

On dysf

On mis

On and

On or m

The

S1: (km



km 0 to km 5

Fig

dReflective

per the Conuld be provi: 79.

S1 road, befunctional.

S2 road, betsing and dys

S5 road betwd missing. Acc

B8 road, betmissing at km

e non‐confor

m 5 to km 11

a Bathinda Netwo

5)

gure 3‐6 : Su

ePavement

tract agreemded on all h

etween km

tween km 2.sfunction.

ween km 19cordingly the

tween km 15m 12.000 to k

mance recor

1.3)

ork in Punjab (Ind

ubstandard R

tMarkers(R

ment delineaorizontal cu

9.000 to km

000 to km3.

9.000 to km e non‐confor

5.000 to km km 14.000.

rded against

dia)

S

Roadside Sig

RUS&CPM9

ators, bollarrves on eith

m 10.000, th

000, km 17.0

20.000, the rmance was

16.000, the

the RPMs is

S2:

S4: (km 0 to k

gns

9)

rds and the er side of th

he RPMs we

000 to km 18

RPMs were recorded fo

RPMs were

presented i

(km 2.24 to

km 5)

other safetye carriagewa

ere found m

8.000the RP

found dysfur the same.

found dysfu

n the Fig. 3‐7

km 10)

32

y devises ay as per

issing or

Ms were

unctional

unctional

7.

TNM


3.3.1

M TECHNOMANAG


S2: (km

10 Pavem

During pavemeAt somemaintai10 is sum

On

On

On

On

As cen

AlsoCon



m 15 to km 2

Fig

mentMarkin

this month ent marking we locations ned as per tmmarized be

S2 road sect

S4 road, the

S5 road, the

B8 road, the

per the Clautreline and e

o as per thntractor mus

a Bathinda Netwo

20)

gure 3‐7 : Po

ng(RUS&CP

audit inspewas observeit was obsehe specificatelow:

tion, the pave

o Betweo Betweeo Betweeo Betwee

not mao Betwee

pavement mo Betweeo Betwee

pavement mo Betweeo Betweeo Betwee

e pavement mo Betweeo Betweeo Betwee

use 15.13 oedge lines on

he Clause 1st ensure tha

ork in Punjab (Ind

oor Mainten

PM‐10)

ction the deed. The paverved that thtions. The no

ement mark

een km 2.240en km 61 to en km 66 to en km 73 toaintained. en km 75 to

marking was en km 6 to ken km 15 to

marking was en km 6 to ken km 9 to ken km 16 to

marking was en km 15.20en km 18 to en km 26 to

f the Contran all state hig

15.3 (last pat the centre

dia)

B8

nance of RPM

eficiency to ment markinhe width of on‐conforma

ing was miss

0 to km 8.00062 and km 667

o km 74, the

km 76

faded/missikm 7 km 16 and k

faded/missikm 7 km 10 km 17

faded/missi00 to km 17.0km 19 km 28.

act Agreemeghways and m

paragraph)of e line and ed

8: (km 15 to k

Ms.

maintainingng was eithethe pavemeance recorde

sing and dam

0, 63 to km 65,

width of pa

ng

km 19 to km

ng

ing 000

ent Contractmajor distric

the Contradge lines me

km 20)

g the serviceer faded or dent marking ed against RU

maged.

avement ma

20

tor has to mct roads.

act Agreemeet the speci

33

e level of damaged. was not US&CPM

king was

mark the

ent, the ifications

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


to othe

Themoris veThepart

Durpres

S2–(K

S2–(K

B8–(K



offer an accetime for con

e roads may rnings, in wiery much reqerefore, the ticularly at th

ring this mosented below

m 2.24 to km

Km 70 to km

Km 15 to km

Figure 3‐8

a Bathinda Netwo

eptable levelnstruction to

be hazardounter seasonquired to maContractor he missing a

onth audit,w in Figure3.

m 10)

75)

m 20)

8: The defici

ork in Punjab (Ind

l of safety foo commence

us for the rowhen fog exaintain the sneeds to end faded sec

the record.8.

ency recorde

dia)

or the road uor if it is und

oad‐users duxists and duervice level ensure the ctions as IRC

ed deficien

ed against P

users at all tderway’.

e to low visiring the monof pavementnew set of‐35.

cies in pav

S2–(Km 60 t

S2–(Km 75 t

B8–(Km 25 t

Pavement Ma

times ‘irresp

ibility in nighnsoon seasot marking atf pavement

vement mar

to km 65)

to km 80)

to km 30)

arking

34

ective of

hts, early n also. It all time. marking

king are

TNM


3.3.1

3.3.1

3.3.1

3.3.1

M TECHNOMANAG


11 Traffic

The imdeficien

On

mai

Thespe

12 Crash

TheSP:

On accispemak

As instenh

13 SightR

Thebotacco

Theincrto t

14 Marke

Thepillaobs

Stillmai

TheNow

Theof dandof vthesmaione

It isCondeta



cIslandand

mprovement ncies were re

S2 road, at kintained as p

e roundaboucifications. T

BarrierMa

e ends of th: 73.

S1 road, betident. It is ined traffic. It ke it safe for

per Contractalled on thehancement w

Rail,HandR

e sight rails, h drivers anordance with

e Contractor rease the safhe Project M

erPostMain

e deficiency ars, edge maerved along

the boundaintain the se

e delineatorsw the curves

e concrete pdifferent road on the otheview. Now thse pipe bollintain and pes.

s very mucntractor shouail design for

a Bathinda Netwo

dRoundabo

in the maiecorded as th

km 67.840, thper IRC: 35.

ts in all the The road safe

aintenance

e MBCB sho

tween km 9nstalled alonis very muc traffic.

ct Agreemee both sides will be achiev

RailandPe

hand rails and pedestriah IRC specific

shall identifety to pedesManager alon

ntenance(R

to maintainarkers, culvethe differen

ary pillars arvice level of

s are installe appear very

pipe bollardsad sections oer locations ohe new delinlards. On thpaint. The da

h required uld need to ir improveme

ork in Punjab (Ind

outMainten

ntenance ohe non‐confo

he road mar

network seety on the ro

(RUS&CPM

ould be flaye

.000 to km ng the sharpch required t

nt the Metof the curv

ved with thei

destrianBa

and pedestrians. The pecations.

fy the locatstrians and ong with an es

RUS&CPM‐1

n the kilomert markers,t road sectio

re not mainf the bounda

ed on both sy nice and sa

s (roadway inof network.of road sectioneators are ihe other senamaged pipe

to enhanceidentify the sent.

dia)

nance(RUS

f roundabouormance sum

king at traffi

ections shououndabouts n

M‐12)

er and cover

10.000, the p curve whicto increase t

tal Beam Crves and any ir installation

arrierMain

ian barriers destrian ba

tions where other vulnerstimate for in

14)

etre stones distance mons of the ne

ntained alonary pillars als

ides of the cfety also enh

ndicators) arThese wereons which arnstalled at tnsitive locate bollards sh

e the safetysensitive loc

S&CPM‐11)

uts was obsmmarized be

c Island and

ld be maintaneeds to imp

red with the

MBCB was ch is not nethe safety ba

rash Barrierother locatin.

ntenance(R

provide guirriers should

the installatable road usnstallation.

, hectometrmarkers and etwork.

g the netwoso.

curves as pehanced.

re existed ale installed atre sensitive fthe curves soions, the pihould be rep

y on the encations at its

served but elow:

roundabout

ained as perprove.

e Fishtails as

damaged duegotiable to arrier at the

(MBCB) shon where th

RUS&CPM‐1

dance to rod be constr

tion of barrsers and repo

re stones, bhazard mar

ork. It is req

er IRC: 79 gu

ong the carrt the curve lfrom the safeo there is nope bollards placed with

ntire road own and su

35

still few

t was not

r the IRC

per IRC:

ue to the the high curve to

hould be he safety

13)

oad users ructed in

iers may ort these

boundary kers was

quired to

uidelines.

riageway locations ety point o need of need to the new

network. ubmit the

TNM


3.4

M TECHNOMANAG


OtherObs

The obsattentioconform 1. S1 R

km



servations

ervations whon are summmance in the

Road:

m 5 – km 11.3

On LHS,Need to

On LHS,should b

On LHS,the safestones,

At km properlyrequired

At km 7post mu

Some ofnot vert

At culveclear un

The culvto maint

The misimmedia

The “Pla16.06).

At curvmaintain

At few required

Bounda

Excavate

Paining

At km Immedia

Settlem

At somenight upuniform

Gantry wtrim therequired

Delineat

The signreplaced

a Bathinda Netwo

onAuditSe

hich were nomarized belownext month’

30

, the reflecto restore.

the electricbe maintaine

Vegetation ety parapetshectometre

6.590, LHS, y. The heighd.

.800, RHS, thust be vertica

f the pipe botical. These s

ert 8/5 and 1sealed shou

vert parapettain the sam

ssing medianately.

ace Identific

ves, some Rn on regular

culvert locatd.

ry pillars nee

ed earth at t

of retaining

9.800, RHS,ate action re

ent on pavem

e locations tp to 160m. A. Need to re

was not visibe tree brand.

tion at Island

n boards andd immediate

ork in Punjab (Ind

ections

ot the part ow. These obs’s audits.

tive tape on

c poles are ced on the po

on the emb. The vegetastones, sign

the curve ht was also

he place idenal and mainta

ollards were hould be pa

10/1, the parlder was not

s height shome throughou

n makers fro

cation Signs”

RPMs were basis. The sp

tions the ca

ed to mainta

the minor jun

walls along t

, the retainequired.

ment was ob

the pavemeAt few locatistore immed

ble due to thnches, co‐or

d was very po

d sign post wely.

dia)

of the non‐coservations m

n the safety

lose to the cles on regula

ankments anation shouldposts and cu

sign post wmore than

ntification sigained as per

still not maiinted in blac

rapets were t available.

ould be unifout the netwo

om the retai

” should be

missing andpacing of RP

tch pits are

in along the

nction should

the road sec

ning wall st

bserved betw

ent marking ions the widdiately.

he obstructiordinate with

oor. Need to

which are no

onformance may become

y parapets m

carriageway,ar basis.

nd shouldersd be removeulvert parape

was damagethe required

gn post was MORT&H sp

ntained. Fewck & white.

close to the

orm on bothork.

ining walls s

as per IRC:

d dysfunctioMs should b

not installe

road section

d be remove

tion should b

ructurally fa

ween km 11.

was blackisdth of edge l

on by the treh the conce

o improve.

ot as per IRC

but need imthe part of

missing or d

, the reflecti

s (after 1m),ed and makeets visible.

ed and not d. Immediat

not vertical.pecifications

w were dama

carriageway

sides and a

should be re

67: 2012, (r

onal which be as per IRC.

d. Immediat

n.

ed immediate

be done on p

ailed and d

200 to km 1

h and not vine marking

ee branches.erned autho

standards s

36

mmediate the non‐

damaged.

ive tapes

covered e the km

painted te action

The sign .

aged and

y and 1m

also need

einstalled

refer Fig.

need to .

te action

ely.

priority.

damaged.

1.300.

visible at was not

Need to orities, if

hould be

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


2. S2 RKm

Km



Road: 2.240 – km 1

The delwas mis

The cush

The RPM

3/1, ero

The placMORT&

The pavcracked

The soilwas notwas obs

The lettnumber

The dammaintain

3/1, 4/1

The signcrossing

The “Pla16.06).

The vegwhich wdrainage

The sectThese sh

Culvert Need to

The min

At someNeed to

At km 9

At km 9plate wa

The RPM

Vegetatvisibilityvisible. immedia

At the imwith theshould b

Bounda

15 – km 20

The mis

The signcrossing

Between

a Bathinda Netwo

10

ineators at tssing and the

hion (with w

M at the edge

osion adjacen

ce identificat&H specificati

vement marlocations.

and milled as per the sserved at site

tering at curing was don

maged hazaned.

1, 5/2, 7/2 cu

n board of pg location as

ace Identific

etation trimwill create te of water fr

tions used fohould be rep

no. 6/1, pao maintain.

nor junctions

e locations tho maintain th

.570, RHS, th

9.620, RHS, as missing.

Ms at the ped

ion on the ey of km stonThe road

ately.

mproved roae Thermoplabe scarified p

ry pillars nee

sing and dys

n board of pg location as

n km 17.500

ork in Punjab (Ind

the Island we Jumbo bolla

waste tyres) a

e line near is

nt the culvert

tion boards ions.

rking was a

material msubmitted me which shou

ulverts shoue poorly.

rd boards a

ulverts have n

pedestrian crper IRC: 67‐2

cation Signs”

med from thhe inconvenom shoulder

or sign posts placed at the

rapet heigh

were not im

he pavementhese immedia

he curve sign

the speed s

destrian cros

embankmentnes, hectomefurniture

ad sections tastic materiaproperly befo

ed to mainta

sfunctional R

pedestrian crper IRC: 67‐2

to km 17.60

dia)

were poorly ard was also

at the Island

sland were m

t parapets w

were old an

also not res

ix used to methodology. uld be remov

uld be as p

at the culve

no catch pit.

rossing shou2012, Fig 15.

” should be

he shouldersnience to thrs.

were not as earliest.

t was less a

mproved/ ma

t marking anately.

n board was

sign post wa

ssing were m

ts and shouetre stones, should be

he pavemenal. The old aore remarkin

in.

PMs need to

rossing shou2012, Fig: 15

00, the chevr

maintained. damaged.

need to rest

missing.

was observed

d the posts

tored after

maintain theExcess and

ved from site

per IRC. At

ert locations

ld be install.33.

as per IRC:

s was not rehe traffic an

s per the MO

and not uni

aintained yet

nd pedestrian

damaged. N

as damaged

missing and d

lders (after sign posts avisible. Tr

nt marking mand damagedng.

o maintain at

ld be install5.33.

rons should b

. The reflect

tore at both

d.

were also no

the rectific

e unsealed sloose milled e at the earlie

some culv

should nee

ed at the pe

67: 2012, (r

moved fromnd also obst

ORT&H specif

form on bo

t.

n crossing wa

eed to maint

and supple

dysfunctiona

1m), obstrucand culvert rim the ve

may need to d pavement

t the earliest

ed at the pe

be installed.

37

tive tape

ends.

ot as per

cation of

houlders material est.

verts the

ed to be

edestrian

refer Fig.

m the site truct the

fications.

th sides.

as faded.

tain.

ementary

l.

cting the parapets egetation

maintain marking

t.

edestrian

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


Km

Km



The fadlocation

The imp

The sectThese sh

The “Pl16.06).

Bounda

45‐km 50

46/1, LHwas obs

Reflectirestore

The para

The imp

At Ch 46be impdelineat

Deficienshould b

Bounda

60 – km 65

The pain

The parrestricte

At few lbe main

The slop

The eroshould bbe done

The heigFRL. Theon both

Culvert Immedia

Culvert width sh

At km 64road. Th

The pipeprovide

Erosion basis anthrough

Few sigspecificaand noimmedia

a Bathinda Netwo

ded pavemens should be

provement of

tions used fohould be rep

ace Identific

ry pillars nee

HS, the catchserved.

ive tape froimmediately

apets should

provement of

6.620, RHS, proved, incrtors.

ncy in Paintinbe rectifying

ry pillars nee

nting of Km s

king of trucked.

locations thentained at all

pes should be

sion of embbe maintainee properly wi

ght of culvee height of p sides as wel

No. 65/1, thate action re

no. 65/3, thhould be 12m

4.800, RHS, the permanen

e and slab cuthe wing wa

of embankmnd maintains vegetation

gn boards ations. The sot comply ately as per t

ork in Punjab (Ind

ent markingmaintained

f minor junct

or sign posts placed at the

cation Signs”

ed to mainta

h pit was dam

om delineatoy.

d be plastere

f minor junct

the existing rease the h

ng of parapeat the earlie

ed to mainta

stones shoul

ks on both s

e pavement time.

e maintained

bankment aded at the earith the suitab

rt parapets parapets sholl throughou

he pipe was pequired.

he parapets m and 1m cle

the village pnt solution ne

ulverts, wheralls as per IRC

ment slopes s these reguand other su

and sign psign boards with the sthe specifica

dia)

g particularat the earlie

tions was sti

were not as earliest.

” should be

in.

maged and e

ors at the p

ed from the b

tions was sti

retaining wheight of r

et was also oest.

in.

d be restore

sides of the

marking wa

d as per the

djacent to thrliest. The bable material.

was very lesuld be as pet the networ

partially cho

are close toear unsealed

ond is full ofeed to propo

re it is not feC: SP: 13‐200

due to rain sularly. The suitable meth

posts are nof junction specificationations.

rly at the st.

ill pending.

s per the MO

as per IRC:

erosion adja

parapets wa

back also.

ill pending.

wall along theretaining w

observed at

ed.

road at HM

as disturbed

specified cro

he parapets ackfilling of t.

ss some havr specificatiork.

oked and cat

o the carriagd shoulder on

f waste wateose and impl

easible to con04.

should be relope protectods.

not as per and Place Ids. These s

pedestrian

ORT&H specif

67: 2012, (r

cent to the

as missing.

e water bodwell and ins

few locatio

P location sh

and faded

oss‐sections.

was observethe catch pit

ve only 360mons and also

ch pit was d

geway. The n both sides.

er and may tlement.

nstruct the c

ectifies on thtion should

IRC and Mdentificationsshould be

38

crossing

fications.

refer Fig.

parapets

Need to

dy should stall the

ns which

hould be

it should

ed which ts should

mm from o uniform

damaged.

roadway

ouch the

catch pits

he urgent be done

MORT&H s are old replaced

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


Km



The shonetwork

Bounda

65 – km 70

The signThese sh

At few lrestored

The km route m

Betweenaction re

At km 62012; Fi

At km 67

The cusposts an

The pav

Betweenembank

The mis

The heigfrom FRuniform

At culveunseale

The pipeprovide

Bounda

Km 70 – km

71/1, cato mainadjacent

The extremoved

71/2, caThe pipe

73/1, 73pit insta2004. EImmedia

At few maintain

74/1, 75side alsoImmedia1m clea

It was oAt some

a Bathinda Netwo

oulders shok.

ary pillars ne

n post are oldhould be rep

ocations thed immediate

stones shouarker should

n km 66‐67,equired.

67.300, LHS, g 15.15.

7.400, LHS, t

shion (with wnd follow the

ement mark

n km 67.900kment slope

sing RPMs sh

ght of culveRL. The heigh on both sid

ert locationd shoulder o

e and slab cuthe wing wa

ry pillars nee

75 atch pit requntain the ut to the para

tra soil (leftd immediate

atch pit is nes chocked w

3/2, catch piallation will nErosion of eate rectificat

locations tn.

5/2, slab, cato. Erosion oate rectificatr unsealed s

observed thae locations t

ork in Punjab (Ind

uld be mai

ed to mainta

d and not coplaced immed

e pavement mly.

uld be painted be marked

, the shovin

the roundab

the speed sig

waste tyres)e same throu

king at round

0 to km 68.00and shoulde

hould be rein

ert parapets ht of parapees as well th

s the roadwon both sides

ulverts, wheralls as per IRC

ed to mainta

ired. LHS paniformity inapets was ob

after constely.

ot attached with silt.

its required.not be possibembankmenttion required

he Culvert

tch pit requiof embankmetion requiredhoulder is no

at the pavemthe width w

dia)

intained on

ain.

ompatible to diately.

marking was

ed and markon each km

g was obser

bout sign sh

gn board was

) should be ughout the n

dabout shoul

00, LHs, the wers need to m

nstalled.

was very leets should broughout th

way width s. At few loca

re it is not feC: SP: 13‐200

in.

rapet heightn parapet hbserved. Imm

truction) at

to the culv

The pipe anble provide tt adjacent td.

parapet pa

red. Parapetent adjacentd. Parapets aot available.

ment markingwas more tha

regular ba

IRC and MO

s faded and b

ked as per IRstone.

rved upto 2

ould be rep

s damaged.

provided inetwork at ot

d be mainta

water stagnamaintain.

ess some habe as per spe network.

should be ations it was

easible to con04.

t is less as coeight. Erosi

mediate recti

the should

vert. Immedi

nd slab culvethe wing wato the para

inting was

ts should be t to the parare close to

g was not man the requi

asis through

ORT&H specif

blackish. It s

RC specificati

0‐25mm, im

laced as per

n from of thther gantries

ined as per I

ated in the R

ave only 300ecifications

12m and 1 less than re

nstruct the c

ompare to RHon of embfication requ

er edges sh

iate action r

erts where talls as per IRCpets was o

faded and

plastered frapets was othe carriage

maintained unired. The p

39

hout the

fications.

hould be

ions. The

mmediate

r IRC: 67‐

he gantry s.

RC: 35.

RoW. The

0‐330mm and also

1m clear quired.

catch pits

HS. Need ankment uired.

hould be

required.

the catch C: SP‐13‐observed.

need to

rom back observed. eway and

niformly. avement

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


3. S4 RKm



markingthe exist

Few sigshould b

At km 7were adysfunctold and

At few maintain

The roukm ston

At km 7Identific

The culvmaintain

Betweenobserve

Bounda

Km 75 – km

At vertic

Culvert parapet also.

Culvert clear un

At few improvecatch pit

The rutshould b

Bounda Road 0 – km 5

Poor imjunctionper IRC:

Culvert immedia

Pavemepaint.

The paraat the ea

Km stonclearly v

At the cshould b

At curve

a Bathinda Netwo

g should be rting old and

n boards wbe replaced i

4.000, the dlso not instional RPMs damaged RP

locations, itned. The pai

te number se, the state

72.200, therecation sign” w

vert parapetn uniform he

n km 73.90ed. Rectificat

ry pillars nee

80

cal curves th

no. 77/1, th height shou

no. 77/2, 77sealed shou

culvert loced yet. Thest walls shoul

ting and shbe done at th

ry pillars nee

mplementation with S3 (i.e 35.

No. 1/1, ately.

ent marking

apet paintinarliest.

nes and hevisible.

culvert parabe improved

es the old de

ork in Punjab (Ind

restored witdamaged pa

ere observeimmediately

elineators wstalled. Immshould be m

PMs from sit

t was obsernting should

should be mehighway rou

e was a speewas there. Im

t height shoeight in the e

00 to km 7ion required

ed to mainta

e road safety

he parapet huld be uniform

7/3, the paralder was not

cations the se should beld be above t

hoving was he earliest.

ed to mainta

on of pavem. NH). The ju

the waterw

should be m

g of few culv

ctometre st

apets the da at the earlie

lineators sho

dia)

h the thermavement ma

ed patched ay.

were not maimediate actimaintained ime.

ved that thd be done at

entioned onute number w

ed limit signmmediate ac

ould be unifoentire netwo

74.000, settd.

in.

y should be e

height was m on both si

apets were ct available. Im

old catch e maintainedthe adjacent

observed be

in.

ment markiunction pave

way was ch

maintained/r

verts was fa

tones should

amaged refleest.

ould be repla

moplastic matrking proper

and not app

ntained andon requiredmmediately

e painting othe earliest.

each km stowas not men

n 30, but no ction require

orm on bothork.

tlement at

enhanced.

not uniformides and thro

close to the mmediate ac

pits were nd immediatet earth level.

etween km

ng was obsment markin

hocked. It

restored wit

ded which s

d be free fr

ective tape

aced immed

terial after srly.

pearing goo

the new ded. The missand also rem

of parapets

one as per IRntioned.

built‐up ared.

h sides and

the pavem

m on both sioughout the

carriagewayction require

not maintainely. The leve

78‐79. Rect

served at kng should be

should be

th the Therm

hould be ma

rom vegetat

and hazard

iately.

40

scarifying

d. These

lineators sing and move the

was not

RC: 8. 5th

ea “Place

need to

ent was

des. The network

y and 1m ed.

ned and el of the

tification

m 0.000 e done as

cleared

moplastic

aintained

tion and

markers

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


Km

Km



At few lthe IRC MORT&

The heigthe culvheight s

At horizper IRC:

At few lo

The bou

5 – km 10

Culvert as per IR

The baccompac

The “Pla

At few tape at t

6/5, the

At curvstandard

The painobservedamagestones s

The “FlaIRC: 67‐

All the s

Bounda

15 – km 20

The painobservedamagestones s

Culvert 20/1 anobserve

The baccompac

The “Pla

At few tape at t

6/5, the

At curvstandard

The “FlaIRC: 67‐

a Bathinda Netwo

locations, thand MORT&

&H specificati

ght of culververt parapethould be ma

zontal curves 79.

ocations the

undary pillars

no. 6/1, theRC guidelines

ckfilling of thted properly

ace Identifica

culvert locatthe parapet

catch pit wa

es, the heigd height sho

ntings of Kmed on theed and painshould be as

ag Type Dire2012 (refer F

signs should

ry pillars nee

ntings of Kmed on the ed and painshould be as

No. 17/1, 18nd 20/4, the ed at few loca

ckfilling of thted properly

ace Identifica

culvert locatthe parapet

catch pit wa

es, the heigd height sho

ag Type Dire2012 (refer F

ork in Punjab (Ind

he section us&H specificaions Clause 8

rt parapets wts had less aintained un

s the distan

e pavement m

s should be m

parapet pais.

he catch pits y.

ation Sign” s

tions the padelineators s

as not attach

ght of the uld be maint

m stones neekm stones.ting was faper IRC.

ection Signs”Fig. 16.04).

be as per IRC

ed to mainta

m stones neekm stones.ting was faper IRC.

8/1, 18/3, 18catch pits aations. Imme

he catch pits y.

ation Sign” s

tions the padelineators s

as not attach

ght of the uld be maint

ection Signs”Fig. 16.04).

dia)

sed in the siations. These801.4.

was not unifparapet heigiformly throu

ce between

marking was

maintained a

inting requir

should be d

hould be as

arapet paintshould be m

hed. Immedia

chevrons wtained at the

ed to mainta Few hectoded. The le

” should be

C: 67‐2012.

in.

ed to mainta Few hectoded. The le

8/4, 18/5, 18are not attacediate action

should be d

should be as

arapet paintshould be m

hed. Immedia

chevrons wtained at all

” should be

ign posts wae should be

form on botght than spughout the n

RPMs shou

faded and a

at the earlies

red and lette

done with th

per IRC:67:2

ing was reqaintained at

ate action re

as less thane earliest.

in. The patcometre stoettering of k

installed at

in. The patcometre stoettering of k

8/6, 19/1, 19ched. The wn required.

done with th

per IRC: 67:

ing was reqaintained at

ate action re

as less thancurves.

installed at

as not compreplaced as

th sides and ecified. The network.

uld be maint

appeared bla

st.

ering should

he suitable e

012 (Fig. 16.

uired. The rt the earliest

equired.

n the requi

hes of paintnes were okm and hec

the Junction

hes of paintnes were okm and hec

9/2, 19/3, 19water stagna

he suitable e

2012 (Fig. 1

uired. The rt the earliest

equired.

n the requi

the Junction

41

patible to s per the

some of parapet

tained as

ckish.

be done

earth and

.06).

reflective .

red. The

ing were observed ctometre

ns as per

ing were observed ctometre

/4, 19/5, tion was

earth and

16.06).

reflective .

red. The

ns as per

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


4. S5 RKm

Km



All the s

Bounda

Road: 5 – km 10

At km 6need to the crac

At km 6trim the

Culvert surroun

At km 6

At km 6erosion.

Need toIRC: 79.

Some osigns.

At few maintainshoulde

It was othe villaactivitie

8/2, catc

The heigthrough

The hazmust be

The pain

At km 9trim the

10/2, ne

Betweencarriage

At somvegetatihectome

Some siReplace

The baccompac

Improve

Km 10; r

The bouguidelin

15 – km 20

Km ston

a Bathinda Netwo

signs should

ry pillars nee

6.050, old slaplaster, pain

cks develope

6.300, the vee tree branch

no. 7/1, 8/ding earth le

.410, the con

.450, the 7/2.

o maintain th

f the speed

locations ned upto 1mrs.

observed thagers. Need ts in future.

ch pit requir

ght of the cuout the netw

zard markerse replaced im

nting of km a

9.560, the vee tree branch

eed to clear t

n km 9.900eway on regu

e locations ion. Need etre stones a

ign posts we these with s

ck filling of tt it to achiev

ement of min

repair and pa

undary pillares.

ne 15, paintin

ork in Punjab (Ind

be as per IRC

ed to mainta

ab culvert, nnt and the nud on paveme

egetation obhes.

1 needs to evel and mai

ndition of cu

2, protect th

he RPMs at c

signs are ir

it was obsm. Vegetation

at the waste to remove an

ed.

ulvert parapework.

s should be mmediately.

and hectome

egetation obhes.

the water wa

0 to km 10ular basis or e

the parapeto cut the vand parapets

ere old and suitable supp

he catch pitsve the requir

nor junctions

ainting of km

rs need to m

ng required.

dia)

C: 67‐2012.

in.

need to cleaumbering alsent. Immedi

bstructs the

raise the wntain it.

urve sign was

he parapet si

curves. The s

rrelevant an

served that n and loose c

material dund also consu

ets should be

maintained.

etre stones r

bstructs the

ay.

.000, need execute ano

et of the cuvegetation is should be v

not compatport posts as

s should be dred level of c

s was not do

m stone requ

maintain and

an and maintso to be donate attention

visibility of

walls of the

s poor. Repla

ides, to cont

spacing of RP

d need to r

the shouldcompaction

umped on thult with them

e uniform on

. The old an

equired.

visibility of

to remove ther alternat

ulverts was in such a mvisible at leas

tible to MOTs per MORT&

done with thompaction.

one. Immedia

uired.

d should be

tain it. The ne. At the culn required.

the Gentry.

catch pit ab

acement req

trol the emb

PMs should b

replace with

der width wwas observe

he shoulder em to stop thi

n both sides

nd damaged

the Gentry;

the dust ftive.

not visiblemanner that st from 100m

TH&H specif&H Clause 80

he suitable e

ate action re

installed as

42

parapets lvert slab

Need to

bove the

uired.

ankment

be as per

suitable

was not ed on the

edges by is type of

and also

markers

need to

from the

e due to the km,

m.

fications. 01.4.

earth and

quired.

s per IRC

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


5. B8 RKm

Km



At few maintainshoulde

16/3, Rcarriage

16/4, pa

At km 16

At km 1action re

17/1, neand mai

Some osigns.

The min

Some sspecificaClause 8

At km 1install as

Bounda

Road 15 – km 20 –

The km the earl


At few lthat thewhich ca

At someat the ea

At few maintain

The dam

The “Plajunction

At few cImmedia

Culvert installed

The spe

Bounda

25 – km 30

The km the earl


a Bathinda Netwo

locations ned upto 1mrs.

RHS parapeteway clearan

arapets need

6.250, RHS, r

6.800, the dequired.

eeds to raiseintain it.

f the speed

nor junctions

sign supportations. Repla801.4.

18.580, MBCs per IRC: SP

ry pillars nee

– km 25

and 5th km siest. The lett


ocations it we required. Nan be mainta

e curve locatarliest. The s

locations tn the service

maged hazard

ace Identificns as per IRC:

curve locatioate action re

no. 17/1, thd. Need to pl

ed limit sign

ry pillars nee

and 5th km siest. The lett


ork in Punjab (Ind

it was obsm. Vegetation

t needs to ce.

ds to shift to

roads crossin

elineators w

e the walls of

signs are ir

were not im

t posts weace these w

CB was not P: 73 guidelin

ed to mainta

stone were ntering should


was observedNeed to mainained.

tions the fewspacing of RP

he pavemee level of the

d markers sh

cation Signs”:67:2012.

ons the chevequired.

he water walaster the ba

s should be a

ed to mainta

stone were ntering should


dia)

served that n and loose c

shift on c

clear the roa

ng sign board

were not visib

f the catch p

rrelevant an

mproved.

re old andwith suitable

rectified. Nnes.

in.

not as per thed be done as


d that the unntain the uns

w RPMs werePMs should b

nt marking e pavement m

hould be rep

” should be

vrons and cr

y was not cck side of th

as per State

in.

not as per thed be done as


the shouldcompaction

catch pit w

adway width

d was in poo

ble due to ve

pit above the

d need to r

not compsupport po

Need to incr

e IRC standa per IRC stan

not compsupport po

nsealed shousealed shoul

e missing whbe as per IRC

was faded marking.

laced at the

placed at a

rash barriers

clear and thee parapet al

Govt. Guide

e IRC standa per IRC stan

not compsupport po

der width wwas observe

wall to incre

h.

or condition.

egetation. Im

e adjacent ea

replace with

patible to Mosts as per M

ease the he

rds. Replacendards.


ulder drop wders upto th

hich need to C.

/blackish.

earliest.

all minor an

s were not i

e catch was so.

lines.

rds. Replacendards.


43

was not ed on the

ease the

mmediate

arth level

suitable

MOTH&H MORT&H

eight and

e these at

MOTH&H MORT&H

was more he extent

maintain

Need to

nd major

installed.

not also

e these at

MOTH&H MORT&H

TNM


3.5

M TECHNOMANAG


Recomme

Momaipainnee

Moeffeirre

Mopavan a

ThesectTheIdenIden

At reqheigIRC

TheentinewThebe p

Theavaeros

In teffefromsho



At few lthat thewhich ca

At someat the ea

At few maintain

The dam

The “Plajunction

At few cImmedia

Some orequired

Some of

Bounda

endationfo

nitoring Conintain the pnting and cueds to mainta

nitoring Conectively and spective of t

nitoring Conement markacceptable le

e deficiency ttions used foe old and ntification Sntification Si

some of theuired or lesght of the sig: 67 guidelin

e catchpits sire road netw catch pits e slab and thpossible prov

e embankmeilable with Psion cuts.

the view of ectively and m safety poiuld be maint

a Bathinda Netwo

ocations it we required. Nan be mainta

e curve locatarliest. The s

locations tn the service

maged hazard

ace Identificns as per IRC:

curve locatioate action re

of the culvd.

f the culverts

ry pillars nee

orNetwork

nsultant haspavement mulvert parapeain.

nsultant recmaintain t

the monthly

nsultant alsokings meet tevel of safety

to maintain tor sign suppoout dated Signs were gns should b

e road sectios than thatgn posts as pnes.

should be ptwork. Contrbut at the se pipe (morevide the wing

ent slopes shPWD. Need

the upcomiput close wnt of view. Ttained at all

ork in Punjab (Ind

was observedNeed to mainained.

tions the fewspacing of RP

the pavemee level of the

d markers sh

cation Signs”:67:2012.

ons the chevequired.

vert parapet

s had no catc

ed to mainta

Performan

s observed tmarking, roaets painting

commends tthe service audit section

recommendhe IRC speciy and service

the sing boaort post wersign supponot as per

be installed.

ons either th. Contractorper IRC guide

rovided at eractor has stame time nee than 2 nosg wall as per

hould be mato ensure t

ng winter sewatch on theThe pavemetime to incre

dia)

d that the unntain the uns

w RPMs werePMs should b

ent markinge pavement m

hould be rep

” should be

vrons and cr

ts had fade

ch pit. Attach

in.

nceWorks

that there iad signs, ais required.

that the CMlevel of thens.

ds that the Cifications ane for the road

rds and signre not compaort posts shr IRC. At e

he height of r needs to celines and al

each culverttated to exeeeds to imps.), where ther IRC:SP:13‐2

aintained in that the emb

eason; the Ce sensitive lont marking, ease the nigh

nsealed shousealed shoul

e missing whbe as per IRC

g was fadedmarking.

laced at the

placed at a

rash barriers

ed painting

h the catch p

is a scope fnd bridge m. This is a co

MU team nee entire net

Contractor md contractuad users at all

support posatible to MOhould be reach minor

the sign pocheck and mso maintain

t location onecute the wrove the exie installation2014.

a good manbankments s

CMU team nocations whidelineators,ht visibility.

ulder drop wders upto th

hich need to C.

d/blackish.

earliest.

all minor an

s were not i

. Immediate

pit to all the

for improvemaintenanceontinue pro

eeds to wotwork at ea

must ensure al obligationl times.

st was obserORT&H specifreplaced. Thjunction th

sts is more maintain thethe sign pos

n both sidesork to conststing catch pn of catch pit

nner within should be fr

needs to woich may be chevrons a

44

was more he extent

maintain

Need to

nd major

installed.

e action

culverts.

ement to e, island cess and

ork more ach time

that the n to offer

rved. The fications. he Place he Place

than the e desired sts as per

s on the truct the pits also. t will not

the land ree from

ork more sensitive nd RPMs

TNM


M TECHNOMANAG


Thnot sho

Spemaispesafe

Convegthe

Thepho



e water bodoverflow anuld be remo

ed zoning ointain the roed limit signety measures

ntractor has etation on scontinuity.

e detailed aotographs is p

a Bathinda Netwo

dies exist alond enters on ved to facilit

of the entirad signs acc boards. In ts and prepar

arranged thhoulders. Th

audit reporpresented in

ork in Punjab (Ind

ong the netwthe networktate the drai

re road netordingly. Cohe built‐up are the propo

he manual ahis is a good

rt with scon Para 3.6.

dia)

work need tok roads. Thenage.

work is verntractor hasareas it is versal according

and mechansign of impr

ores, un‐rep

o protect so extra soil on

ry much req started the ry much reqgly.

ical grass curovement an

ported non‐

o that the wan the should

quired and activity to inuired to enh

utters to connd needs to

‐conformanc

45

ater may der edges

need to nstall the ance the

ntrol the maintain

ces with

TNM


3.6

3.6.1

T

T

T

A

Acc

M TECHNOMANAG


Consolida

1 Contra

Table 3‐4 :

Month

Mar‐13

Jul‐13

Aug‐13

Sep‐13

Oct‐13

Nov‐13

Dec‐13

Total – 2013

Jan‐14

Feb‐14

Mar‐14

Apr‐14

May‐14

Jun‐14

Jul‐14

Aug‐14

Sep‐14

Oct‐14

Nov‐14

Dec‐14

Total – 2014

Jan‐15

Feb‐15

Mar‐15

Apr‐15

May‐15

Jun‐15

Jul‐15

Aug‐15

Sep‐15

Oct‐15

Nov‐15

Dec‐15

Total – 2015

Jan – 2016

Feb – 2016

Mar – 2016

April – 2016

May – 2016

Jun‐16

Jul‐16

Aug‐16

Sep‐16

umulated Total



atedAuditR

actor'sAud

: Accumulate

S1 S2

2 12

2 12

2 11

1 14

2 16

1 12

2 13

12 90

0 9

1 9

1 17

1 11

1 10

1 7

0 5

0 3

1 9

1 13

7 20

14 42

28 155

2 13

2 7

40 31

4 44

24 16

0 36

0 35

0 131

2 87

2 65

0 32

0 26

76 523

0 8

2 43

2 2

0 43

1 16

14 29

4 43

8 24

14 29

161 100

a Bathinda Netwo

Report

itReporto

ed Scores Su

2 S3

2 0

2 0

1 1

4 0

6 0

2 0

3 0

0 1

3

0

7 0

1 0

0 0

0

0

0

0

3 1

0 0

2 3

5 7

3 1

1

1 0

4 0

6 53

6 0

5 55

1 0

7 0

5 11

2 0

6 4

3 125

0

3 39

0

3 0

6 0

9 8

3 0

4 2

9 0

05 182

ork in Punjab (Ind

nSeptembe

ubmitted by

S4 S5

10 6

6 1

2 3

10 2

4 0

5 1

4 2

41 15

3 3

2 2

2 2

1 3

3 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

6 4

1 3

13 1

11 24

42 44

0 3

4 4

20 40

22 20

11 10

2 28

3 0

6 0

6 18

15 2

23 4

2 8

114 137

8 0

2 10

53 0

0 20

0 46

19 0

4 4

22 12

4 11

309 299

dia)

er2016

Contractor f

5 B8

4

4

5

6

5

5

5

5 34

6

6

4

4

5

1

0

3

3

2

17

4 35

4 86

4

4

0 39

0 69

0 31

8 44

17

0

8 21

19

5

5

7 258

26

0 20

44

0 14

6 2

36

10

2 14

1 30

9 574

for Non‐Con

MPM RDP

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

16 0

16 0

24 0

0 0

0 0

6 0

22 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

52 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

68 0

nformances

PMNon –

Conforma

34

25

24

33

27

24

26

193

24

20

26

20

21

9

5

6

23

21

58

145

378

47

22

170

165

167

110

110

137

134

114

64

45

1285

42

116

101

77

65

106

65

82

88

2598

46

nce

TNM


Ta

Sr.

1 Tota

2 Tota

3 Tota

Month:Se

Month : Septem

MPM

MPM 1

MPM 2

MPM 3

MPM 4

MPM 5

MPM 6

Repeat MPM N

SL.

No.Con

re

Total Road D

Month : Sep

M TECHNOMANAG


Table

Table 3‐6: M

able 3‐7: Roa

alManagementP

alRoadDurabilit

alRoadUserSafe

eptember2016

mber 2016

Item Descript

Quality Assurance Sy

Contractor`s Program

Contractor`s Reports

Traffic Management

Inventory Database Management

Detailed Design & CoMethodology

Non-Conformance from PMonth

Non‐

nformance

elating to

Sectio

Durability Non‐Con

ptember 2016



3‐5 : Summ

Management

ad Durability

PerformanceNo

tyNon‐Conform

ety&ComfortN

tionPerforma

MeasuComplia

ystem

ms

onstrcution

Previous

on Code

Number

Conform

Reco

Contr

A

0

nformance Score

a Bathinda Netwo

ary of Netw

t Performan

y Performan

ItemDescript

on‐Conformance

manceScore(RD

Non‐Conformanc

Summaryof

ance ure ance

NumberNon-Conform

Acontrac

0

r of Non‐

mances

rded

ractor

A

Non

Conform

Weigh

B

0 5

ork in Punjab (Ind

ork Perform

nce Measure

ce Measures

tion

eScore(MPM'S)

DPM'S)

ceScore(RUS&

fNetworkPerfo

TotalSc

r ofmances

ctor

Non-Conforman

WeightinB

2

1

2

4

2

4

4

Total Ma

n‐

mance

hting

Sub‐We

Months/W

Recorde

Confor

C

0

dia)

mance submit

s (MPM`S) S

s (RDPM`S) –

)

&CPM'S)

ormanceSystem

coreofNon‐Con

nce ng

Sub-WDays/Week

Recorded No

Each Week of De

Each day of Delay

Each day of non r

Each day of non r

Each Week of De

Each Week of De

Number of Monthsconfoermance firs

anagement Performanc

eighting

Weeks of

ed Non

rmance

C

Total

Confor

Sco

Ax

Cont

0 0

0

tted by Cont

Submitted by

– Submitted

Co

m

nformance

Weighting ks/Months of

on Conformance

N° X

elay

y

reciept after deadline

reciept after deadline

elay

elay

s since non-st identified.

ce Non-Conformance S

l Non‐

rmance

ore

BxC

ractor

0

0

tractor

y Contractor

d by Contract

Scoresontractor

0

0

88

88

Non-Con Weigh x SubW

C

Total NonConformanScore AxBx

Contracto

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0Score

Comments

47

r

tor

Remarks

n-nce xCor

CommentsRef

Phot

Referenc

Photo ference No.

o

ce No.

TNM


Table

M TECHNOMANAG


e 3‐8 : Road

S111

S112

S211

S212

S213

S214

S215

S216

S217

S218

S219

S220

S221

S222

S223

S224

S225

S226

S227

S228

S229

S230

S311

S411

S412

S413

S414

S415

S511

S512

S513

S514

S515

B811

B812

B813

B814

B815

Total Leng

Total

Total Leng

Name of Ro

Total Leng

Name of Ro

Name of Ro

Name of Ro

Total Leng

Name of Ro

Total Lengt

Name of Ro

Total Length

Section



User Service

F

0

5

2

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

10

18

0

5

10

15

20

0

5

10

15

20

9

15

20

25

30

gth of B8 Road

kms

l Contract Roa

gth of S4 Road

kms

ad :‐ Dhanula

gth of S5 Road

kms

ad :‐ Bathind

ad :‐ Mansa‐T

ad :‐ Sangrur‐

gth of S1 Road

kms

ad :‐ Bhawan

th of S2 Road

kms

ad :‐ Barnala‐

h of S3 Road:

a Bathinda Netwo

e and Comfo

From

0.000

5.000

2.240

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

00.000

82.640

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

9.200

5.000

0.000

5.000

0.000

d: 28.650

ad Length: 20

CONFORMA

d: 24.970

a‐Bhikhi (S5)

d: 25.340

a‐Kotshamir‐

Talwandi Sab

Chaina

‐Sunam (S1)

d: 11.300

nigarh‐Sunam

d: 106.130

‐Mansa (Man

7.290 kms

ork in Punjab (Ind

ort Performa

To

5.000

11.300

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

35.000

40.000

45.000

50.000

55.000

60.000

65.000

70.000

75.000

80.000

85.000

90.000

95.000

100.000

108.770

189.930

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

24.970

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.340

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

37.850

Total Non‐C

03.680 kms ‐

ANCES

Total Non‐

Total Non‐

‐Talwandi Sab

bo upto Ramti

age

Total Non‐

m‐Bhikhi‐Kots

Total Non‐

nsa Kainchian

Total Non‐

dia)

ance Measur

5.0

6.3

7.7

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

8.7

7.2

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.3

5.8

5.0

5.0

5.0

7.8

Conformance

TOTAL NON‐

Conformance

Conformance

bo upto Ramt

irath Jaga (S4

Conformance

shamir (S2)

Conformance

n to Ram Ditte

Conformance

Audit L

in (K

es – Submitt

00

00

60

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

70

90

00

00

00

00

70

00

00

00

00

40

00

00

00

00

50

es B8

es S4

es S5

tirath Jaga (B

4)

es S1

es S2

e Wala Chowk

es S3

Length

Kms)

Aud

Sep

Ass

ted by Contr

0

14

14

14

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

3

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

29

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

4

0

4

0

7

0

11

0

26

0

4

0

30

88

8)

k) (S3)

dit Score of

ptember ‐16

sesment‐1

48

ractor

TNM


3.7

3.7.1

Table 3‐contractadjusted

3.7.2

Sr.

1 TotalMa

2 TotalRo

3 TotalRo

Month:Septem

M TECHNOMANAG


Summary

1 Analys

Thissubm(MC

Netwa) b) c)

AccMoRM0

‐9 gives the t and compad by the MC

2 Manag

Acc(MPoutEmp

TheimpDurdatesubthe reco

anagementPerform

adDurabilityNon‐

adUserSafety&C

mber2016



y&Compar

sisandCom

s section prmitted by thC) after inspe

work PerformManagemenRoad DurabRoad User S

ording to nitoring Con03.

summary oarison of thefor the mont

Ta

gementPer

ording to thPM‘s) reflectputs, includiployer.

e crack inveproved in thering the 17th e of investigsequently exreport by

orded under

ItemDe

manceNon‐Confor

‐ConformanceSco

ComfortNon‐Confo

a Bathinda Netwo

risonofCon

mmentsofth

rovides a dehe Contractoecting the au

mance Inspent Performanility PerformService and C

the Contracnsultant (MC

of the audit e NON‐CONFth of Septem

able 3‐9 : Sum

rformanceM

he Contract t the ability ing the qual

stigation ane 1st year wWorld Bank ation reportxtended. In s30th Septem MPM3 as p

escription

rmanceScore(MPM

ore(RDPM'S)

ormanceScore(RU

SummaryofN

Tot

ork in Punjab (Ind

ntractor’sA

hePerform

escription aor and reviewdit sections.

ection includence Measuremance MeasuComfort Perf

ct Specifica) has perfor

for each typFORMANCES mber 2016.

mmary Non‐

Measures(M

Agreementof the Contity and effic

nd remedial ork programmission, Cot from 30th Juspite of the ember 2016.resented in T

M'S)

US&CPM'S)

etworkPerforman

alScoreofNon‐Co

dia)

Auditvs.Mo

manceAudit

and analysis wed/adjuste

es each onees (MPM’s) ures (RDPM’sormance Me

tions (Appemed the Aud

pe of Perforsubmitted b

‐Conformanc

MPM’s)

t, the Manatractor to suciency of his

measures mme would bntractor requne 2016 to extension, th For the saTable 3.10.

SCon

nceSystem

onformance

onitoringCo

tInspection

of the moed by the M

e of the below

s). easures (RUS

endix 8), tdit Inspectio

rmance Meaby the Contr

ces

gement Peruccessfully mreporting o

report for tbe submitteuested to ex30th Septem

he Contactorame the no

Scoresntractor

Sc

0

0

88

88

onsultant’s

n

onthly auditonitoring Co

w items:

S&CPM’s)

the Contracons as per th

asures set ouractor with t

rformance Mmanage the of informatio

the S2 roadd by the Coxtend the sumber 2016 wr had failed ton‐conforma

coresMC

Re

20

0

124

144

49

sAudit

t reports onsultant

ctor and e format

ut in the the score

Measures contract

on to the

d section ntractor. bmission

which was o submit nce was

emarks

TNM


Month : September 2016

MPM Item

MPM 1 Quality Assu

MPM 2 Contractor`s

MPM 3 Contractor`s

MPM 4 Traffic Mana

MPM 5Inventory DaManagemen

MPM 6Detailed DeMethodology

Repeat MPM Non-ConformanMonth

3.7.3

SL.

No.

No

Confor

relat

Total Road Dur

Month : Septe

M TECHNOMANAG


DescriptionPerform

Co

urance System

s Programs

s ReportsCracks Inv

agement

atabase nt

sign & Constrcution y

nce from Previous

3 RoadD

As pthe futuCon

RDPEmpNonreco

Nowroug

Thenetwcuts

on‐

rmance

ting to

Section Cod

rability Non‐Conforman

mber 2016



mance Measure ompliance

NumNon-Con

cont

vestigation Report

Table 3‐10 :

DurabilityP

per the ContContractor’

ure generatintract.

PM’s are theployer’s assen‐conformanorded until a

w the Contrghness (IRI)

e rain cuts anwork. Contras.

Table 3‐1

e

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Contractor

A

N

0

nce Score

a Bathinda Netwo

mber ofnformances

Atractor

Number oNon-Conforma

AMC

0 1

: Manageme

Performanc

tract Agreems ability to sions and pr

e contractuaessment. Failnce for thata program of

ractor has odata. The IR

nd erosion oactor tried t

11 : Road Du

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

MC

A

Conf

We

0

ork in Punjab (Ind

ofances

Non-Conformance

WeightingB

R

2 Eac

1 Eac

2 Eac

4 Eac

2 Eac

4 Eac

4Numcon

Total Managemen

ent Performa

ceMeasure

ment these asuccessful prrotect it fro

al requiremelure to delivet measure. Tf rectification

owned his owI data presen

of embankmto improve t

urability Perf

Non‐

formance

eighting

B

Sub‐We

Months/W

Record

Confor

C

5 0

dia)

Sub-Weighting Days/Weeks/Months of

Recorded Non Conformance

ch Week of Delay

ch day of Delay

ch day of non reciept after deadl

ch day of non reciept after deadl

ch Week of Delay

ch Week of Delay

mber of Months since non-nfoermance first identified.

nt Performance Non-Conform

ance Measu

es(RDPM’S)

are a set of rotect the pom consump

ents, which mer the specifThis non‐con work has b

wn Profilomnted in Chap

ment were obthe embankm

formance Me

eighting

Weeks of

ed Non

rmance

C

Total No

Conforma

Score

AxBxC

Contract

0 0

0

N° Non-Con X Weigh x

SubWC

Total NonConformanScore AxB

Contracto

0

0

ine 10 0

ine 0

0

0

0

0mance Score

res (MPM’s)

)

performanceavement anption over t

must be meied RDPM crnformance een agreed w

meter and stpter 3.

bserved at fement slopes

easures (RD

on‐

ance

C

tor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

AxBxC

MC

0

0

n-nce

BxCor

Total Non-Conformance Score AxBxC

MC

0

0

20With re

Meetin30t

0

0

0

0

20

)

e criteria thad surfacing the duration

et at the timriteria will rewill continuwith the Em

tarted to co

ew locationss and rectify

PM’s)

Comment

50

Comments Photo

eference to World Bank ng, The deadline was h September 2016

at reflect asset for n of the

me of the sults in a ue to be ployer.

ollect the

s of road the rain

ts Photo N

o No.

No.

TNM


3.7.

3.7.

3.7.

3.7.

M TECHNOMANAG


.3.1 Minim

As eContyear

TherAsse

The Nove

The and

.3.2 Pavem

The provPartsurvmenmuseverthe 8.2.2carry

In acontcrite

As pClauInterprecCont

Nowof thanal

The

.3.3 Pavem

Pave

Cont

Sub‐sect

.3.4 Roadw Any

Emb



mumAnnua

explained intractor's wors and is bind

refore so faet Preservatio

4th year worember 2015

4th year wo3.6 kms for

mentRough

roughness ivisions of Se 2A of the cey and meantioned in tht measure thry six (06) mIRI (Internat2.2. Also it isy out roughn

accordance wtractor shall eria througho

per the conse 2.6.2.4, rnational Rocision Profiletractor shall

w the Contrache network ysed as per c

IRI data colle

mentDeflec

ement Deflectract Works,

‐section3.2.2ions was rec wayCutand

non‐conformbankment Slo

a Bathinda Netwo

alAssetPre

Sub‐chapteork annual pding on the C

r there are on Quantitie

rk program (.

ork programmrehabilitatio

hness(RDP

is a measurection VI – Spcontract specasure the roe Chapter 8,he roughnesmonths theretional Roughs very imporness measure

with the Clensure that

out the durat

ntract agreethe Rough

oughness Inde according own and ma

ctor has ownroads. The clause 8.2.2.

ected by the

ction(RDPM

ction shall b Chapters 8 a

2 of this recorded and fo

dEmbankm

mance undeope.

ork in Punjab (Ind

eservationQ

er 3.1, this program thatContractor.

no NON‐COes.

(i.e. revised 3

me has beenn.

PM‐2)

e of comfortpecificationscifications. Tughness and Clause 8.2.2ss within the eafter. The vhness Index)rtant to undements any t

ause 8.2.2 t the roughtion of the c

ment Sectiohness shall dex (IRI). Thto the specaintain the R

ned his ownIRI will be c

e Contractor

M‐3)

e measuredand 16 of Pa

port, the pound within

mentSlopes

er the RDPM

dia)

Quantities

measure pet was appro

ONFORMANC

3rd year) was

n approved

t of road uss and ContraThe contractod analyse th2 of Contractfirst six (06)values corre shall meet erstand thattime during

of the specness of the ontract.

on III Evaluabe measu

he equipmecifications aoughness Pr

Profilometecalculated fo

is presented

according tart 2A of the

pavement dethe permiss

s(RDPM‐4)

M‐4 was not

–WorkPro

ertains to thoved by the

CES regardin

s submitted

for 52.42 km

sers and in aact Works, Cor has to cohe data as pt Agreement) months on sponding tothe requiret the Employthe entire co

cifications opaved surfa

ation and Qred by usient requiredas defined brofilometer a

er and starteor the entir

d the Chapter

o Section VIContract Ag

eflection onible limits as

)

recorded fo

ogram

he fulfilmenemployer f

ng Minimum

by the Cont

ms for impro

accordance hapters 8 anduct the roer the specit. The emplonew pavem parameter ments of thyer’s has theontract.

of the contrace conform

Qualification ng the me must be aby ASTM E‐9at all times.

ed to collect e road netw

r 3, Para 3.2

– Specificatreement.

n the differes per Clause 8

or Roadway C

51

nt in the for three

m Annual

tractor in

ovement

with the nd 16 of oughness ifications yer, who ents and which is e Clause e right to

ract, the ms to the

Criteria, ethod of a Class 1 950. The

the data work and

2.1.

tions and

ent road 8.2.3.

Cuts and

TNM


3.7.4

M TECHNOMANAG


4 RoadU

• AccoPerfday com

• The ServexpeCon

• Anycorr

• Theincluadjusubm

• The audMea



UserServic

ording to tformance Mto day serv

mply with theobjectives

vice is mainectations actractor’s perway the firesponds to trefore, the udes the Nusted by themitted by thcomparisonit scores byasures ‐ RUS&

a Bathinda Netwo

eandComf

the Contraceasures (RUviceability oe Contract Stof the Contntained, whicross the rarformance.nal score othat of the Mfinal mont

NON‐CONFORe Monitoringhe Contracton of the audity MC regard&CPM, is sho

ork in Punjab (Ind

fortPerform

ct AgreemeUS&CPM) refof the roadsandards spetract Standaich reflects nge of Cont

of the NONMonitoring Cthly audit sRMANCES rg Consultantor. t scores submding to Roaown in the T

dia)

manceMea

nt, the Roflect the roas under the cified for eacards are to the road utract assets,

N‐CONFORMonsultant's Ascores for trelating to t are 144 ag

mitted by thad User SerTable 3.12.

asures‐RUS

ad User Sead user‘s exContract. Tch RUS&CPMensure thatuser‘s day t and to per

MANCES incAudit Inspecthe month RUS&CPM, gainst the m

e Contractorrvice and Co

S&CPM

ervice and xpectation abThe ContractM. t a defined to day servrmit auditin

luded in thtion. of SeptembMPM & R

monthly scor

r versus the omfort Perf

52

Comfort bout the tor must

Level of iceability g of the

his MPR

ber 2016 RDPM as res 88 as

adjusted formance

TNM


Month : Se

Referen

Bidd

Docum

Sectio

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&C

RUS&CP

RUS&CP

RUS&CP

RUS&CP

RUS&CP

Any RUS

Any RUS

Any Road

Haza

M TECHNOMANAG


T

eptember 2016

nce to

ding

ment

on VI

CPM1 Paveme

CPM2 Unseal

CPM3 Drainag

CPM4Routine

Structu

CPM5Obstru

Should

CPM6 Inciden

CPM7 Vegeta

CPM8 Roadsid

CPM9 Raised

PM10 Paveme

PM11 Traffic

PM12 Crash B

PM13Sight R

Mainte

PM14Marker

Culvert

S&CPMRepeat

Month

S&CPMAny un

by the

d Safety

ards

Any Im

Instruc



Table 3‐12 :

Item Des

ent Maintenance

ed Shoulder Mai

ge Maintenance

e Maintenance o

ures

ctions on the Pav

ers

nt and Emergency

tion Control

de Signs Mainten

Reflective Pavem

ent Markings ‐ (L

Island and Roun

Barrier Maintena

ails, Hand Rail an

enance

r Posts (Guard Sto

t, Distance Marke

ted Non‐Conform

s

‐reported Non‐C

Monitoring Cons

mediate Safety H

ted for Repair

To

R

a Bathinda Netwo

Summary of

scription

e

intenence

of Bridge and oth

vement Surface a

y Works Respons

nance

ment Markers

Lines, Text, Symb

dabout Mainten

nce

nd Pedestrian Ba

ones, Boundry, E

ers, Hazard)

mance in Consecu

Conformance ide

sultant

Hazard to Road U

otal Score

RUS FIELD

ork in Punjab (Ind

f Non–Confo

Minim

for E

Non

5km (1

5km (1

her 5km (1

and

se

ols etc)

ance

arrier

Edge,

utive

ntified

Users

dia)

ormances of

mum Audit Length

Each Recorded

‐ Conformance

1km for cracking)

1km for cracking)

1km

1km for cracking)

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

RUS&CPM M

h

Total Non

Conformanc

Score

AxBxC

Contracto

) 2

) 1

2

) 0

0

0

0

0

10

42

1

0

0

0

58

30

0

0

88

Measures

‐

ce

r

Total Non

Conforman

Score

AxBxC

MC

2

1

0

0

0

0

2

2

10

46

1

0

0

0

64

30

30

0

124

53

n‐

nce

Commentss

OM

Month : Se

Non‐Confo

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

An

An

Any

TNM TECMAN


eptember 2016 Date of Au

ormance Relating To

RUS&CPM1 Pavement

RUS&CPM2 Unsealed S

RUS&CPM3 Drainage M

RUS&CPM4 Routine M

RUS&CPM5 Obstructio

RUS&CPM6 Incident an

RUS&CPM7 Vegetation

RUS&CPM8 Roadside S

RUS&CPM9 Raised Ref

US&CPM10 Pavement

US&CPM11 Traffic Islan

US&CPM12 Crash Barr

US&CPM13 Sight Rails,

US&CPM14Marker Po

Markers, H

ny RUS&CPM Repeated N

ny RUS&CPMAny un‐rep

Consultant

y Road Safety

HazardsAny Immed

3.8 Verific



udit: 06.10.2016

Item Description

Maintenance

Shoulder Maintenence

Maintenance

aintenance of Bridge and other S

ons on the Pavement Surface and

nd Emergency Works Response

n Control

Signs Maintenance

flective Pavement Markers

Markings ‐ (Lines, Text, Symbols

nd and Roundabout Maintenanc

ier Maintenance

, Hand Rail and Pedestrian Barrie

sts (Guard Stones, Boundry, Edg

Hazard)

Non‐Conformance in Consecutive

ported Non‐Conformance identifi

t

diate Safety Hazard to Road Use

cationofContra

Bathinda Network in P

Road Se

Minim

for

Non

5km (1

crackin

5km

Structures

d Shoulders

etc)

e

er Maintenance

e, Culvert, Distance

e Months

ied by the Monitoring

rs Instructed for Repair

Total

actor’sAuditR

Table

Punjab (India)

ection : S1; Length of Audit Sect

mum Audit Length

Each Recorded

n ‐ Conformance

Number

Conform

Recor

Minimum

Lengt

Contra

km for ravelling or

ng or edgebreake)0

(1km for Shape) 0

1km 0

5km 0

1km 0

N/A 0

5km 0

5km 0

5km/1km 1

5km/1km 0

5km 0

5km 0

5km 0

5km 0

1

0

0

Score

Report

3‐13 : Verificatio

tion = 6.3 km; Location from km

of Non‐

mances

rded

m Audit

th A

actor

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

on of Audit – Sec

54

m 5.00 to km 11.30

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

Sub‐W

N

Con

Week

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

6

6

6

ction S1 – Km 5.0

4

Weighting

No of

nsecutive

s/Months

C

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 2

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

2 12

1 0

0 0

14

00 to Km 11.300

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2 RRP

0

0

0

0

0

12RUS&CP

0

0

14

Comments

PM missing between km 9 to km

PM ‐ 9 (2 months From Augsut 2

September 2016)

Photo No.

10 1,2 & 3

016 to

OM

TNM TECMAN



Non‐Conformance Relating To

RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards



Date of Audit: 05.10.2016

Item D

Pavement Maintenance

Unsealed Shoulder Maintenenc

Drainage Maintenance

Routine Maintenance of Bridge

Obstructions on the Pavement

Incident and Emergency Works

Vegetation Control

Roadside Signs Maintenance

Raised Reflective Pavement Ma

Pavement Markings ‐ (Lines, Te

Traffic Island and Roundabout

Crash Barrier Maintenance

Sight Rails, Hand Rail and Pede

Marker Posts (Guard Stones, Bo

Markers, Hazard,Road Delineat

Repeated Non‐Conformance in

Any un‐reported Non‐Conform

Consultant

Any Immediate Safety Hazard t


Table

Description

ce

e and other Structures

Surface and Shoulders

s Response

arkers

ext, Symbols etc)

Maintenance

strian Barrier Maintenance

oundry, Edge, Culvert, Distance

tors)

Consecutive Months

ance identified by the Monitorin

to Road Users Instructed for Rep

Punjab (India)


7.76 km Audit Length Start

Minimum Audit Length

for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance

5km (1km for ravelling or

cracking or edgebreake)

5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

ng

pair

Total Score

on of Audit – Sec

t Location S2 km 2.240

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Num

Co

Min

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

55

ction S2 – Km 2.2

to km 10

mber of Non‐

onformances

Recorded

nimum Audit

Length A

MC

Non‐

Conformanc

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

1 2

6 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

0 6

0 6

5

24 to Km 10.000

ces

g

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

T

Co

C

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

Total Non‐

onformance

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

12 12

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

14 14

e

Comment

RRPM missing between

Pavement marking missi

2.240 to km

ts Photo N

n km 2 to km 3 4,5 &

ing between km

m 87,8,9 & 10,

No.

6

11,12

OM

TNM TECMAN


Month : September 2016 Da


RUS&CPM1 Pa

RUS&CPM2 Un

RUS&CPM3 Dr

RUS&CPM4 Ro

RUS&CPM5 Ob

RUS&CPM6 In

RUS&CPM7 Ve

RUS&CPM8 Ro

RUS&CPM9 Ra

RUS&CPM10 Pa

RUS&CPM11 Tr

RUS&CPM12 Cr

RUS&CPM13 Sig

RUS&CPM14M

M

Any RUS&CPM Re

Any RUS&CPMAn

Co

Any Road Safety

HazardsAn



ate of Audit: 05.10.2016

Item Descri

avement Maintenance

nsealed Shoulder Maintenence

rainage Maintenance

outine Maintenance of Bridge and o

bstructions on the Pavement Surfa

cident and Emergency Works Resp

egetation Control

oadside Signs Maintenance

aised Reflective Pavement Markers

avement Markings ‐ (Lines, Text, Sy

raffic Island and Roundabout Maint

rash Barrier Maintenance

ght Rails, Hand Rail and Pedestrian

arker Posts (Guard Stones, Boundr

arkers, Hazard)

epeated Non‐Conformance in Cons

ny un‐reported Non‐Conformance i

onsultant

ny Immediate Safety Hazard to Roa


Table

5 km

ption

M

5km

cra

5

other Structures

ce and Shoulders

ponse

s

ymbols etc)

tenance

n Barrier Maintenance

ry, Edge, Culvert, Distance

ecutive Months

identified by the Monitoring

ad Users Instructed for Repair

To

Punjab (India)


m Audit Length Start Location S


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance

Numbe

Confo

Rec

Minim

Len

Cont

m (1km for ravelling or

acking or edgebreake)

5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

otal Score

on of Audit –Sect

S2 km 15 to km 20

er of Non‐

rmances

corded

um Audit

ngth A

tractor

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

56

tion S2 – Km 15.

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

Sub‐Weig

No o

Consec

Weeks/M

C

2 1

1 1

2 1

2 1

1 1

2 1

1 1

2 1

2 1

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

2 1

6 0

6 1

6 0

6

00 to Km 20.00

ghting

of

cutive

Months

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

C

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

Total Non‐

onformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2 RRP

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

Comments

PM missing between km 17 to km

Photo No.

18 13,14 & 15

OM

TNM TECMAN


Month : September 2016 D


RUS&CPM1 P

RUS&CPM2 U

RUS&CPM3 D

RUS&CPM4 R

RUS&CPM5 O

RUS&CPM6 I

RUS&CPM7 V

RUS&CPM8 R

RUS&CPM9 R

RUS&CPM10 P

RUS&CPM11 T

RUS&CPM12 C

RUS&CPM13 S

RUS&CPM14M

M

Any RUS&CPM R

Any RUS&CPMA

C

Any Road Safety

HazardsA




Item Des


Unsealed Shoulder Maintenence


Routine Maintenance of Bridge an

Obstructions on the Pavement Su

ncident and Emergency Works Re

Vegetation Control


Raised Reflective Pavement Marke

Pavement Markings ‐ (Lines, Text,

Traffic Island and Roundabout Ma


Sight Rails, Hand Rail and Pedestr

Marker Posts (Guard Stones, Boun

Markers, Hazard)

Repeated Non‐Conformance in Co

Any un‐reported Non‐Conformanc

Consultant

Any Immediate Safety Hazard to R


Table

cription

nd other Structures

rface and Shoulders

esponse

ers

, Symbols etc)

aintenance

ian Barrier Maintenance

ndry, Edge, Culvert, Distance

onsecutive Months

ce identified by the Monitoring

Road Users Instructed for Repair

Punjab (India)


5 km Audit Length Start Location


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance

N

C

M



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

Total Score

on of Audit – Sec

n S2 km 45 to km 50

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Number of

Conforma

Record

Minimum

Length

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

57

ction S2 – Km 45.

f Non‐

ances

ded

Audit

h A

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

S

W

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

6

6

6

7

.00 to Km 50.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total Non‐

Conformanc

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0

e

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Comments

Photo No.

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item D





Obstructions on the Pavement S


Vegetation Control



Pavement Markings ‐ (Lines, Tex

Traffic Island and Roundabout M


Sight Rails, Hand Rail and Pedes


Markers, Hazard)


Any un‐reported Non‐Conforma

Consultant

Any Immediate Safety Hazard to


Table

Description

e

and other Structures


Response

arkers

xt, Symbols etc)

Maintenance



Consecutive Months

ance identified by the Monitoring

o Road Users Instructed for Repa

Punjab (India)


5 km Audit Length Start Loc


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

g

air

Total Score

on of Audit – Sec

ation S2 km 60 to km 6

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Numbe

Confo

Rec

Minim

Len

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

58

ction S2 – Km 60.

65

er of Non‐

ormances

corded

um Audit

ngth A

MC

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

3 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

0 6

0 6

8

.00 to Km 65.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total N

Conform

Sco

A*B

Contra

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 6

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

6

Non‐

mance

re

*C

actor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6Pav

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

Comments

ement marking faded between k

km 63 to km 65

Photo No.

km 61 to 62 & 16,17,18 & 19

9,20

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item D







Vegetation Control











Consultant



Table

Description

ce



s Response

arkers

ext, Symbols etc)

Maintenance

estrian Barrier Maintenance


tors)

Consecutive Months



Punjab (India)



for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

ng

pair

Total Score

Road Section: S2; Length o

on of Audit – Sec

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Num

Co

Min

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

of Audit Section: 5 km; Location

59

ction S2 – Km 65.

mber of Non‐

onformances

Recorded

nimum Audit

Length A

MC

Non‐

Conformanc

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

1 2

1 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

0 6

0 6

from km 65 to km 70

9

.00 to Km 70.00

ces

g

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

T

Co

C

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

Total Non‐

onformance

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

1 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

3 3

e

Comments

Pavement marking faded b

km 67

Road marking at Traffi

Roundabout at km 67+840

as per IRC: 3

s Photo No

etween km 66 to 21,22 & 2

ic island and

0 not maintained

35

o.

23

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1 P

RUS&CPM2 U

RUS&CPM3 D

RUS&CPM4 R

RUS&CPM5 O

RUS&CPM6 I

RUS&CPM7 V

RUS&CPM8 R

RUS&CPM9 R

RUS&CPM10 P

RUS&CPM11 T

RUS&CPM12 C

RUS&CPM13 S

RUS&CPM14M

M

Any RUS&CPM R

Any RUS&CPMA

C

Any Road Safety

HazardsA




Item Des




Routine Maintenance of Bridge a


Incident and Emergency Works R

Vegetation Control


Raised Reflective Pavement Mark

Pavement Markings ‐ (Lines, Text



Sight Rails, Hand Rail and Pedestr

Marker Posts (Guard Stones, Bou

Markers, Hazard,Road Delineator


Any un‐reported Non‐Conforman

Consultant



Table

scription

nd other Structures

urface and Shoulders

esponse

kers

t, Symbols etc)

aintenance

rian Barrier Maintenance

undry, Edge, Culvert, Distance

rs)

onsecutive Months

nce identified by the Monitoring


Punjab (India)



for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

Total Score

Road Section S2; Length of Aud

on of Audit – Sec

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Number

Conform

Recor

Minimum

Lengt

M

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

dit Section: 5 km; Location from

60

ction S2 – Km 70.

of Non‐

mances

rded

m Audit

th A

C

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

6

6

6

km 70 to km 75

0

.00 to Km 75.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total No

Conforma

Score

A*B*C

Contract

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0

on‐

ance

e

C

tor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2Poo

73 to

0

0

0

0

0

6

0

8

Comments

or maintenance of pavement ma

o km 74, width not maintained a

RUS&CPM ‐ 10

Photo N

rking between km

s per specifications 24,25 &

No.

26

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item De







Vegetation Control


Raised Reflective Pavement Mar






Markers, Hazard)

Repeated Non‐Conformance in C


Consultant



Table

escription

e



Response

rkers

xt, Symbols etc)

Maintenance



Consecutive Months



Punjab (India)

3‐20: Verificatio

5 km Audit Length Start Loca


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

g

air

Total Score

on of Audit – Sect


Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Numbe

Confor

Reco

Minimu

Leng

M

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

61

tion S2 – Km 75.

80

er of Non‐

rmances

orded

um Audit

gth A

MC

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

1 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

1 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

0 6

0 6

1

00 to Km 80.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total N

Conform

Sco

A*B

Contra

1 2

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 2

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

4

Non‐

mance

re

*C

actor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

2Ru

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2 Pa

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

Comments

utting/Flow of pavement observe

78+300 to km 78+750

vement marking faded between

Photo No

ed between km

RHS27,28 & 2

km 75 to km 76 30,31 & 3

o.

29

32

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item De







Vegetation Control






Sight Rails, Hand Rail and Pedest


Markers, Hazard)



Consultant



Table

escription

e



Response

rkers

t, Symbols etc)

Maintenance

trian Barrier Maintenance


Consecutive Months


o Road Users Instructed for Repai

Punjab (India)

e 3‐21: Verificati

5 km Audit Length Start Locat


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

r

Total Score

ion of Audit – Se

tion S4 km 0 to km 5

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Number of

Conforma

Record

Minimum

Length

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

62

ction S4 – Km 0.

f Non‐

ances

ed

Audit

h A

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

BW

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

6

6

6

2

00 to Km 5.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total Non‐

Conformanc

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0

‐

ce

r

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

1. Major

IRC: 67 ‐

2. At km

LHS & RH

3. Schoo

4. At km

LHS & RH

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

0

8

Comments

r road ahead sign at km 0+100 RH

‐2012, Fig. 15.19

1+600 speed breaker signs were

HS and also not as per IRC: 67 ‐2

ol signs are not as per IRC: 67 ‐20

2+010 speed breaker signs wer

HS and also not as per IRC: 67 ‐2

RUS&CPM ‐ 8

Photo No

HS not as per

e different on

2012, Fig. 15.49

12, Fig. 15.34

re different on

2012, Fig. 15.49

33,34,35 & 36,

o.

,37,38

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item D







Vegetation Control











Consultant



Table

Description

ce



s Response

arkers

ext, Symbols etc)

Maintenance

estrian Barrier Maintenance


tors)

n Consecutive Months



Punjab (India)



for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

ng

pair

Total Score

Road Section: S4; Length o

on of Audit – Sec

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Nu

Co

Mi

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

of Audit Section: 5 km; Location

63

ction S4 – Km 5.0

mber of Non‐

onformances

Recorded

nimum Audit

Length A

MC

Non‐

Conforman

Weightin

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

1 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

1 6

0 6

from km 5 to km 10

3

00 to Km 10.00

ces

g

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Co

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

Total Non‐

onformance

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 6

0 0

0 8

e

Commen

Pavement marking faded/

km 6 to km

RUS&CPM ‐

ts Photo N

/missing between

m 739 & 4

‐ 10

No.

40

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1 P

RUS&CPM2 U

RUS&CPM3 D

RUS&CPM4 R

RUS&CPM5 O

RUS&CPM6 I

RUS&CPM7 V

RUS&CPM8 R

RUS&CPM9 R

RUS&CPM10 P

RUS&CPM11 T

RUS&CPM12 C

RUS&CPM13 S

RUS&CPM14M

M

Any RUS&CPM R

Any RUS&CPMA

C

Any Road Safety

HazardsA




Item Des




Routine Maintenance of Bridge an

Obstructions on the Pavement Sur

ncident and Emergency Works Re

Vegetation Control


Raised Reflective Pavement Marke

Pavement Markings ‐ (Lines, Text,



Sight Rails, Hand Rail and Pedestri

Marker Posts (Guard Stones, Boun

Markers, Hazard,Road Delineators


Any un‐reported Non‐Conformanc

Consultant

Any Immediate Safety Hazard to R


Table

cription

nd other Structures

rface and Shoulders

esponse

ers

Symbols etc)

aintenance

ian Barrier Maintenance

ndry, Edge, Culvert, Distance

s)

onsecutive Months

ce identified by the Monitoring


Punjab (India)


5 km Audit Length Start Location


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance

N

C

M



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

Total Score

on of Audit – Sec

n S4 km 15 to km 20

umber of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Number of

Conforma

Recorde

Minimum

Length

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

64

ction S4 – Km 15.

f Non‐

ances

ed

Audit

A

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

S

W

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

6

6

6

4

.00 to Km 20.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total Non‐

Conformanc

Score

A*B*C

Contractor

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 4

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

4

ce

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4Pavem

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

Comments

ment marking faded between km 1

19 to km 20

Photo No

15 to km 16 & km 41 & 42

o.

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1 P

RUS&CPM2 U

RUS&CPM3 D

RUS&CPM4 R

RUS&CPM5 O

RUS&CPM6 I

RUS&CPM7 V

RUS&CPM8 R

RUS&CPM9 R

RUS&CPM10 P

RUS&CPM11 T

RUS&CPM12 C

RUS&CPM13 S

RUS&CPM14M

M

Any RUS&CPM R

Any RUS&CPMA

C

Any Road Safety

HazardsA




Item Des







Vegetation Control











Consultant



Table

scription

nd other Structures


Response

kers

t, Symbols etc)

aintenance



rs)

onsecutive Months



Punjab (India)



for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

r

Total Score

Road Section: S5; Length of Au

on of Audit – Sec

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Number

Conform

Reco

Minimum

Leng

M

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

2 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

dit Section: 5 km; Location from

65

ction S5 – Km 5.0

of Non‐

mances

rded

m Audit

th A

C

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

1 1

0 2

0 2

2 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

1 6

0 6

m km 5 to km 10

5

00 to Km 10.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total No

Conforma

Score

A*B*C

Contrac

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 4

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

4

on‐

ance

e

C

ctor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

1Veg

0

0

4Pav

0

0

0

0

0

6

0

11

Comments

etation on shoulder more than 10

0 to km 5

vement marking faded between k

9 to km 10

RUS&CPM ‐ 7

Photo No

0mm between km 43 & 44

m 6 to km 7 & km 45 & 46

o.

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item D







Vegetation Control











Consultant



Table 3

escription

e



Response

rkers

xt, Symbols etc)

Maintenance



ors)

Consecutive Months



Punjab (India)


5 km Audit Length Start Loca


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

g

air

Total Score

n of Audit – Sect


Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Num

Con

R

Mini

L

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

66

tion S5 – Km 15.0

0

ber of Non‐

formances

ecorded

mum Audit

Length A

MC

Non‐

Conformance

Weighting

B

0 2

1 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

1 1

0 2

1 2

1 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

1 6

0 6

6

00 to Km 20.000

es

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

To

Con

A

Co

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

otal Non‐

formance

Score

A*B*C

ontractor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0 0

1 1

2 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

2 2

2 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 6

0 0

7 12

Comments

Low shoulder and reverse slo

km 15 to km 2

At km 15+630 parapet paintin

Audit

Vegetation on the shoulders m

high between km 15 to km 16

RPMs missing/dysfunctional b

km 20

Pavement marking faded betw

17

RUS&CPM ‐

Photo No

pe found between

2047,48 & 49

ng done during MC 51

more than 100mm

6 & km 16 to km 1752,53 & 54

between km 19 to 56,57,58 &

ween km 16 to km

7

o.

9,50

4,55

& 59

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item De







Vegetation Control








Markers, Hazard)



Consultant



Table 3

escription

e



Response

rkers

xt, Symbols etc)

Maintenance

trian Barrier Maintenance


Consecutive Months



Punjab (India)


5 km Audit Length Start Locat


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

ir

Total Score

on of Audit – Sec

tion B8 Km 15 to Km

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Numbe

Confor

Rec

Minimu

Len

M

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

67

tion B8 – Km 15.

m 20

er of Non‐

rmances

orded

um Audit

gth A

MC

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

1 2

3 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

1 6

0 6

0 6

7

.00 to Km 20.00

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total

Confor

Sco

A*B

Contr

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 2

1 6

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

3 1

1 0

0 0

2

Non‐

mance

ore

B*C

ractor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

6 6Pa

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

8 18

0 0

0 0

6 26

Comments

RRPM missing between km

vement marking faded between

km 18 to km 19

RUS&CPM ‐ 10 (3 months from

September 2016

Photo N

15 to km 16 60,61 &

km 15 to km 17 & 63,64,65 &

m July 2016 to

)

No.

62

66,67

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11

RUS&CPM12

RUS&CPM13

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPM

Any Road Safety

Hazards




Item D







Vegetation Control








Markers, Hazard)



Consultant



Table 3

Description

e



Response

arkers

xt, Symbols etc)

Maintenance



Consecutive Months


o Road Users Instructed for Rep

Punjab (India)

3‐27 : Verification

5 km Audit Length Start Loc


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

g

air

Total Score

n of Audit – Sect

cation B8 Km 20 to k

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Numbe

Confor

Reco

Minimu

Leng

M

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

68

tion B8 – Km 20.0

km 25

r of Non‐

rmances

orded

um Audit

gth A

MC

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

0 6

0 6

8

00 to Km 25.000

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total N

Conform

Scor

A*B

Contra

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0

0

Non‐

mance

re

*C

actor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Comments

Photo No.

OM

TNM TECMAN




RUS&CPM1

RUS&CPM2

RUS&CPM3

RUS&CPM4

RUS&CPM5 O

RUS&CPM6

RUS&CPM7 V

RUS&CPM8

RUS&CPM9

RUS&CPM10

RUS&CPM11 T

RUS&CPM12 C

RUS&CPM13 S

RUS&CPM14

Any RUS&CPM

Any RUS&CPMA

C

Any Road Safety

HazardsA




Item Des







Vegetation Control











Consultant



Table 3

scription

nd other Structures


Response

kers

t, Symbols etc)

aintenance



rs)

onsecutive Months



Punjab (India)

3‐28 : Verification


for Each Recorded

Non ‐ Conformance



5km (1km for Shape)

1km

5km

1km

N/A

5km

5km

5km/1km

5km/1km

5km

5km

5km

5km

r

Total Score

Road Section: B8; Length of Au

n of Audit – Sect

Number of Non‐

Conformances

Recorded

Minimum Audit

Length A

Contractor

Number

Conform

Recor

Minimum

Lengt

M

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

udit Section: 5 km; Location from

69

tion B8 – Km 25.0

of Non‐

mances

rded

m Audit

th A

C

Non‐

Conformances

Weighting

B

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 1

0 2

0 2

2 2

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 2

0 6

0 6

0 6

m km 25 to km 30

9

00 to Km 30.000

Sub‐Weighting

No of

Consecutive

Weeks/Months

C

Total No

Conforma

Score

A*B*C

Contract

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 4

1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

4

0

on‐

ance

e

C

tor

Total Non‐

Conformance

Score

A*B*C

MC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4 Pav

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

Comments

vement marking faded between k

Photo No.

km 26 to km 28 68,69 & 70

0

TNM

OPRC World Monthly Progre

3.9

[

M TECHNOLOMANAGEM

Bank Project for Sess Report No 24 (Se

Audit Inspect

[Photograph N

Ph

Ph

Ph

OGY AND MENT LTD.

angrur Mansa Bateptember 2016)

tion Photogra

Numbers As R

oto No. 1

oto No. 3

oto No. 5

thinda Network in

aphic Record

Referred in Ab

Punjab (India)

d of Non‐Conf

bove Tables (

formances

(From Table 3

P

P

P

3.13 To Table

Photo No. 2

Photo No. 4

Photo No. 6

70

3.28)]

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Ph

Ph

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 7

oto No. 9

oto No. 11

thinda Network in Punjab (India)

P

P

P

Photo No. 8

Photo No. 10

Photo No. 12

71

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 13

oto No. 15

oto No. 17


P

P

P

Photo No. 14

Photo No. 16

Photo No. 18

72

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 19

oto No. 21

oto No. 23


P

P

P

Photo No. 20

Photo No. 22

Photo No. 24

73

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 25

oto No. 27

oto No. 29


P

P

P

Photo No. 26

Photo No. 28

Photo No. 30

74

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 31

oto No. 33

oto No. 35


P

P

P

Photo No. 32

Photo No. 34

Photo No. 36

75

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 37

oto No. 39

oto No. 41


P

P

P

Photo No. 38

Photo No. 40

Photo No. 42

76

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 43

oto No. 45

oto No. 47


P

P

P

Photo No. 44

Photo No. 46

Photo No. 48

77

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 49

oto No. 51

oto No. 53


P

P

P

Photo No. 50

Photo No. 52

Photo No. 54

78

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 55

oto No. 57

oto No. 59


P

P

P

Photo No. 56

Photo No. 58

Photo No. 60

79

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 61

oto No. 63

oto No. 65


P

P

P

Photo No. 62

Photo No. 64

Photo No. 66

80

TNM


M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


Pho

Pho

OGY AND MENT LTD.


oto No. 67

oto No. 69


P

P

Photo No. 68

Photo No. 70

81

TNM


4 ENV

4.1

4.2

SI.

No.

De

1 RO

wit

day

any

of

2 Bo

Ma

3 Co

and

fac

ma

4 Co(bonowama

5 Am

(AA

M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


VIRONME

Environmen

This part ofmanagementIssues relatedstaff at site, management

Complianceguidelines

Table 4‐

escription Act

OW Encroachm

thin five work

ys of observin

y encroachme

ROW.

rrow Area

anagement

nstruction pla

d Contractor‘

cilities

anagement

nstruction waoth hazardoun‐hazardous aste) anagement.

mbient Air Qu

AQ) in

OGY AND MENT LTD.


ENTAL&S

ntalManage

f the report t conducted dd to functionaair pollution

t were discus

e as per En

‐1: Complianc

tivity St

Con

ment

king

ng

ent

No

ants

‘s

All recompobtaadeqimplesite s

aste s and

Storerecycregu

ality Mitigmeas

thinda Network in

SOCIALM

ement

highlights tduring the moality of equipn control actsed. Observa

nvironment

ce as per Env World

tatus as Per

tractor’s MP

Nil

ot applicable.

egulatory pliance ined and quate ementation ospecific EMP.

ed, reused, cled & sold larly.

gation sures taken fo

Punjab (India)

ANAGEM

the activitiesonth of Septement’s, healttivities, dust tions and key

tal Perform

ironmental PBank guideli

R

Action R

Regular

required

Records

shall be

of

Facilitiessite shoaccordanobservat

Solid a

Material

done as

Act.

Spillage

hazard

controlle

contami

waste sh

hazardo

or Dust sup

Plantatio

ENT

s related to ember 2016. th and safetyemission coy issues have

mance Indic

Performancenes

Required / M

be taken

observa

d.

of borrow a

maintained a

s for labor ould be maince wittions raised b

nd Hazardo

l Manageme

s per Provisio

of bitumen

material s

ed and

nated sand

hould be sto

us waste faci

ppression / b

ons in both

the Environ

y of labour anontrol, water been explain

cators as p

Indicators as

Measures to

tion is

area closed

at site.

and plant ntained in h the by the MC.

ous Waste

ent to be

ons of the

and other

should be

d oil

and other

ored under

lity.

arriers and

the camp

82

nment and

d other contrand waste w

ned in the rep

per World

s per

Remar

Insufficient circulation exhausts were obselabor camneed imattention.

Improvemenrequired foperation maintenanceWaste ManaSites.

Dust barrieinstalled bu

social

ractor water port.

Bank

rks

Air and

facilities rved in ps and

mmediate

nt is for the

and e of agement

rs were ut more

TNM


con

str

6 AmLevconstr

7 Reg

com

8 EnvMaPro

9 OpMaProlabduma

10 Machaarcremexccon

11 Precomdisto inccom

M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


nstruction

etches.

mbient Noise vels (ANL) in nstruction etches.

gulatory

mpliance.

vironmental anagement ocess.

perational anagement ocesses includbour deploymring routine aaintenance w

anagement ofance discoverchaeological mains at any scavated undentract.

evention of mmunicable seases spreadnew areas ducreased mmunication

OGY AND MENT LTD.


enhaby resprinfor dsupp

Mitigmeasredulevel has bper msched

Docuand rof licperm& renupda

EnvirScreeEnvirImpa& Enmanaof linroadsubmappr

ding ment and ork.

As peroutimain

f any ry of

site er the

Not f

ding ue to

s.

HIV‐Aawarcondothetakenbase

thinda Network in

ancing the AAegular nkling of wateust

pression.

gation sures taken focing the noise& monitoring

been carried amonitoring dule.

umentation record keepinenses/

mits/ consentsnewed/ ated regularly

ronmental ening, ronmental act Assessmenvironmental agement Plannk specific s has been mitted and oved by clien

er schedule one and ntenance wor

found.

AIDS reness camp iducted and r measures n on regular s.

Punjab (India)

AQ

er

sites to b

basis.

or e g as

Improve

to att

pollution

ng

s

y.

To be co

nt

n

nt.

To be m

clauses

agreeme

MoEF 20

amendm

f

rk.

Improve

provision

Protectiv

labour

mainten

bank no

If fou

archaeo

project

docume

is Awarene

organize

agreeme

Condom

as soon

be improved

ed plantation

tenuate th

n generation.

omplied regul

maintained a

setup in

ent & EIA not

006 and its s

ments.

ement requ

n of PPEs

ve Equipmen

for rout

nance work as

rms.

nd, any

logical rema

site s

nted.

ess camps

ed as per

ent. At c

m Boxes shou

as they are e

on priority

n will help

he Noise

.

larly.

as per the

contract

tification of

subsequent

uired for

(Personal

nt) to the

tine and

s per world

such an

ains in the

shall be

should be

contract

amp site

ld be filled

mpty.

83

are still rSurvival oplants under greeneeds toensured.

Sewage trplant shouoperated rand inspections done.

required. of the planted

en belt o be

reatment uld be regularly regular shall be

TNM


4.3

SI. No.

1 Sw

2 S

3 C

4 ADH

5 CC

6 Ap

7 F

4.4

SI. No.

1 Soma

2 Sane

3 Wtre

M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


StatusofGe

Ta

Facilities

Separate Driwater facility

Security

Creche Facilit

Availability Doctor / MeHelp

Cooking faciCanteen

Awareness posters

First Aid Facil

StatusofPh

T

Indicators

olid waste anagement

nitation etwork

aste water eatment facil

OGY AND MENT LTD.


eneralfacilit

able 4‐2 : Sta

s

nking Providrinkby co

Provicamp

ty Not R

of edical

Detafacilitavaila

lities/ Proviin Caother

Awarrelatecampposte

ity First both first store

hysicalEnvir

Table 4‐3 : St

Not Ma

Provide

ity Providefunctio

thinda Network in

tiesatContr

atus of Gener

Stat

ided. Treatmking water haontractor at p

ided. Gated p sites is prov

Required.

ils of nties/ local able.

ided. Meal faamp site for r camp reside

reness posteed to occupp site. Road sers need to be

Aid boxes camp sites. aid room wae room.

ronmentalA

tatus of Physi

Status

aintained

ed

ed but not onal.

Punjab (India)

ractorCamp

al facilities at

tus

ment facility as been provproject site.

entry for vided.

earby Meddoctors

acility is provproject staff ents.

ers are instapation safetysafety awaree provided.

are providedAt old campas being use

AspectsonS

ical Environm

Responsi

Contracto

Contracto

Contracto

pSite

t Contractor

for vided

Regulasystem

both SecuriCamp

The operafacility

dical are

Agreehospitof thmedic

vided and

‐

alled y at eness

More installof the

d at p site ed as

First APlacembox mshall used f

Site

mental Aspect

ibility

or SegremaincompdumpUrge

or ‐

or To befunct

Camp Site

Action

ar Maintenam to be done

ity Guard at should be m

camp site tors and drivy is not requi

ement may betal or medicae Emergenccal requireme

number of aled and on see project road

Aid box to ment and acmay be improbe maintainefor any other

ts on Site

Action requ

egation yardntained. posting pit wp area. nt attention

e made opertional.

84

n / Remarks

nce of filter.

the entry poaintained.

has the favers only, thred.

e done with tal authority focy services aents.

wareness poselected junctd.

be managedccessibility ooved. Dispened and shoupurposes.

uired

d was not Organic

was used as

is required.

ational and Proper

rs and RO

oint of the

acility for hus Creche

he nearest or facilities and other

sters to be tion points

d properly. f First aid sary room uld not be

Remarks

‐

‐

‐

TNM


4 StoPla

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

5 Du1. 2. 3.

6 Sa

7 Oi

8 PPLa

9 DGSta

10 Plaanca

M TECHNOLOMANAGEM


ockyard anning

Solid Platfor

Segregation Materials

Layout of Ya

Ground Levelling

Covering vehicles fine parttransportati

ust SuppressioHaul Road Stock Yard Open Area Camp Site

fety Equipme

l & Grease Tr

PEs provided tbour

G sets adequaack

antation insidnd around themp site

OGY AND MENT LTD.


rms Provideand installacamp s

of ‐

ard Approvplan is client.

Mainta

of for

ticle on

‐

on

in

Not ma

ent Partiall

rap Provide

to Partiall

ate Provide

de e

Not pro

thinda Network in

ed for DG setothe

ations in botsites.

ved layouawaited from

ained

aintained

ly maintained

ed.

ly maintained

ed

ovided.

Punjab (India)

ts er h

Contracto

Contracto

ut m

Contracto

Contracto

Contracto

Contracto

d. Contracto

Contracto

d. Contracto

Contracto

Contracto

treatbe dtestinplacerequ

or Garlawas sand wthe cplatfo

or

or ‐

or Shouregul

or ‐

or Dust insta

or Geneneed

or To main

or ImprRequAwarof Pprovi

or ‐

or New and matunearbplantpossimeas

tment of wasone and primng facility ed onsite asirements.

anding of the suggested to was implemecontractor fororms

uld be maintalarly.

barriers shallled on priori

eral safety meds to be impro

be cleanntained regula

ovement require Trainreness prograPPE which ided to labou

Saplings to healthy /

ure trees avaby areas mted in new caible, as sure.

85

te water to mary water should be per PPCB

Platforms contractor nted by r DG sets

ined

l be ty.

easures oved.

ned and arly.

uired. ning & am for use has been

urs.

be planted growing /

ailable from may be re‐amp site, if immediate

TN

OM

4

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


4.5 Status

Activities

Camp Layout Plan

Consent to Establishment (CTE) for Hot Mix Plant (Apollo)

Consent to Operation (CTO)

for Hot Mix Plant (Apollo)

NOC for change of Land Use

Permission for Withdrawal of Ground Water for Construction

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


ofStatuaryCle

StatutoryAuthority

PWD, Sang

Punjab StaPollution Con

Board

) Punjab StaPollution

Control Boa

District TowPlanner, Bath

Central GroWater Boa


earancesApplic

Table 4‐4

y y

WheRequi

rur Befo

Constru

ate ntrol

BefoConstru

ate n ard

BefoConstru

wn hinda

BefoConstru

und ard

BefoExtrac

Punjab (India)

cableforproje

4 : Status of Statu

en ired

Camp‐1: Khia

ore uction

Appliedcamp seweraletter PIPL/OPdated 3

ore uction

AppliedPIPL/OP14/010 09.2013

ore uction

AppliedPIPL/OP14/ 24.10.2

ore uction

Applied16.04.2

ore ction

AppliedOPRC/P14/007 No.908Mansa.

ctandCampsi

uary Clearances A

Applied

ala Khurd Camp a

d with reviselayout plan witge system vid

nPRC/186/ 20131.07.2013

d vide letter nPRC/PWD/ 201

dated 23

d vide letter nPRC/ PWD /201

027 date2013

d dated 2013

d vide PIPPWD/201/2013‐

Receivin3 at DC offic

86

te

Applicable for pr

Status

Obtain

at Km. 64+050; 3

ed th de o. 13

‐

o. 3‐23.

Obtained ZO/BTI/201304.10.2013

o. 3‐ed

Obtained ZO/BTI/WPCdated 19.1/APC/2013/19.12.2013

Obtained 997DTP(B)/517.04.2013

L/

ng ce

In process (letter no2015) has office Man16341) date

6

roject and Camp

ed / Approved

3KM LHS

vide NOC 3/ NOC ‐110 da

vide NOC C/ 2013 /F‐112.2013 & ZO// F‐ 148 da

vide letter 55 da

Gentle remin. PIPL/OPRC/6been given to nsa (receiving ed on 30.07.2015

p site

Expiry Da

NA

No. ted

03.10.20

No. 164 /BTI ted

30.06.20

no. ted NA

der 18/ DC no.

5

NA

ate Rem

14 Renewrequired abeen es

16 Not in udemo

Extractiofrom localbore wellpaymen

marks

wal is not as plant has tablished

use; to be obilized

n of water lly available l owner on nt mode.

TN

OM

C

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


Installation of Generators

Explosive License for

Storing Fuel Oil, Lubricants,

Diesel, etc. at Construction

Camp

Camp‐2: Khiala K

Camp Layout Plan

Consent to Establishment

(CTE) for Hot Mix

Plant (Linhoff)

Consent to Operation (CTO)

for Hot Mix Plant (Linhoff)

Storage Handling and Transport of Hazardous Materials

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


Punjab ElectricityBoard

Chief Cont.Explosive

Kalan Camp at K

PWD, Sang


Board

) Punjab Sta

Pollution ConBoard


Board


y Befo

Installa

. of es

BefoInstalla

M. 61+600; 0.3K

rur Befo

Constru

ate ntrol

BefoConstru

ate ntrol

BefoConstru

ate ntrol

BefoConstru

Punjab (India)

ore ation

Applied2014 ‐ 123.04.2

ore ation

Applied2014‐ 122.04.2

KM RHS

ore uction

Appliedlayout seweraletter n/2014 d

ore uction

Applied10830929.03.1

ore uction

Applied130825dated 1

ore uction

AppliedID no. 111.06.2

d PIPL/ADMIN15/078 dated 2015

d PIPL/ADMIN15/018 dated 2015

d revised camplan wit

ge system vidno. PIPL/OPRC/40dated 09.09.2014

d ID Nos. 96 dated 1014

d ID Nos. 53 and 130818816.05.1014

d application 1421038 dated 2014

87

N/ Obtained vdated 27.04

N/ Obtained P/NC/PB/14dated 22.04

mp th de 08 4

‐

Obtained vidZO/BTI/2014dated 17.04

Obtained vidZO/BTI/WPCZO/BTI/APC21.05.2014

Obtained HWM/MMSdated 28.08

7

ide memo 00074.2015

vide 4/4153 (P31704.2015

de NOC No. 4/ NOC ‐123 4.2014

de NOC No. C/ 2014/F‐180 /2014 /F‐163 da

vide letter S‐2014/16826448.2014

760 10.04.20

no. 010) 31.12.20

NA

16.04.20

& ted

30.06.20

no. 27.08.20

17

17

15 Renew

required abeen es

19 Indus

R14MNS

15 Applied fo

(Applic3467

wal is not as plant has tablished

stry ID S1083075

or renewal cation ID 7370)

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


Installation of Generators

Permission for Withdrawal of Ground Water for Construction

Registration of Vehicles & RoadEquipments

PUC of all Vehicles/ Machinery

Labour license

Labour License

Sand Mining

Quarry for Aggregates

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


Punjab ElectricityBoard

Central GroWater Boa

Motor VehiDepartme

Motor VehiDepartme

Labour Commission

Sangrur

Labour Commission

Bathinda

Dept of Geo.Mining

Dept of Geo.Mining


y Befo

installa

und ard

BefoExtrac

icle nt

Befoconstru

icle nt

Befooperat

ner ‐

ner, a

‐

And Befooperat

And Befooperat

Punjab (India)

ore ation

Applied2014‐1523.04.2

ore ction

AppliedOPRC/P14/007 No.908Mansa.

ore uction

Applied

ore ional

Applied

Appliedletter PIPL/AD15/39 d

Appliedvide PIPL/AD15/40 d

ore ional

‐

ore ional

‐

d PIPL/ADMIN5/078 date2015

d vide PIPPWD/201/2013‐

Receivin4 at DC offic

Other Clear

d various date

d various date

d for renewal vidn

DMIN/2014‐ dated 15.12.2014

d for renewedletter n

DMIN/2014‐ dated 15.12. 201

88

N/ ed

Obtained vid000761 date

L/

ng ce

In process (letter no2015) has office Man16341) date

rances

Obtained

Various date

de o.

4

Obtained v563 dated labours

o.

4

Obtained vi20/2013 da50 labours

‐

‐

8

de memo ed 27.04.2015

Gentle remin. PIPL/OPRC/6been given to nsa (receiving ed on 30.07.2015

es

ide License no.‐19.02.2013 for 1

ide License no. ‐ted 06.05.2013

10.04.20

der 18/ DC no.

5

NA

Various da

Various da

‐ L‐100 31.12.20

‐ L‐for

NA

NA

17

Extractiofrom localbore wellpaymen

ates Engaged

pro

ates Engaged

pro

16 Applied fo

Not Appprocur

existing sa

Not Appprocur

existing sa

n of water lly available l owner on nt mode.

d for OPRC oject

d for OPRC oject

or renewal.

‐

plicable as red from and quarry

plicable as red from and quarry

TN

OM

4

T

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


Debris Disposal Sites

Canal Water Permission

Forest Clearance

.

4.6 Future

Following key iss

1. Air pollu

2. Air pollu

3. Waste ha

4. Safety pr

These are the ke

issues may be re

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


Gram Panch

IrrigationDepartme

e Forest

Departme

ekeyissuesas

sues may arise du

tion from Hot M

tion from road c

andling and man

ractices during ro

ey potential issue

solved and mana


ayat Befo

Operat

n nt

‐

nt Befo

Operat

reviewedfrom

uring future cons

ix Plant operatio

onstruction work

nagement during

oad construction

es that may arise

aged if good envi

Punjab (India)

ore tional

AppliedPIPL/OPdated 0

Applieddated 0

ore tional

Various

mtheworkspro

struction work as

on.

k.

road constructio

n.

during further r

ironmental pract

d vide letter nPRC/ 101/20102.05.2015

d for renewal 06.10.2015

s dates for differe

ogrammeandw

s there may be ch

on.

oad construction

tices and environ

89

o. 13

Renewed vreceipt no01.10.2015

ent Sections

workmethod

hange in scenario

n work and chang

nmental managem

9

vide serial no. o. 110485 da

o in the working

ge in working me

ment plan to be

NA

Z, ted 31.03.20

NA

method and wor

ethod and workin

implemented.

Ch. 6+300road. Not debris be

16 Applied fo

Applicatioclearances

by PSan

rking program.

ng program. How

0 R/S on S‐2 required as ing reused.

or renewal

on for forest s submitted PWD, ngrur

wever these

TN

OM

5

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


5 ROAD SA

5.1 Introdu

This se

finding

Safe an

practic

The Se

by the

5.2 Crash R

Crash a

Contra

The pr

Month

Table 5

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


AFETY AND TR

uction

ection presents t

gs performance a

nd efficient netw

es in accordance

ction also contai

World Bank Miss

Records

analysis is presen

ctor. The fatal cr

incipal data sour

ly Progress Repo

5‐1 gives the sna


RAFFIC MANA

the road safety p

udit conducted m

work are the prim

e with the provisi

ns recommenda

sion.

nted by using cra

rashes are verifie

rce for this repo

orts (MPRs). The d

pshot of total cra

Punjab (India)

AGEMENT

performance of

monthly by Mon

me aims of the O

ions of the contra

tions based on c

ash records from

ed with the police

ort was the Road

data format is pr

ashes on the OPR

the OPRC netwo

itoring Consultan

OPRC project. MC

act ‐ to ensure th

continuous road s

m the March 2013

e records for auth

d Crash database

rogressively bein

RC network year

90

ork in terms of

nt.

C is making all ef

hat the Contracto

safety assessmen

3 up to Septemb

henticity.

e maintained by

g improved to pr

wise.

0

crash statistics b

fforts with the he

or builds and ope

nt being carried o

er 2016. The info

M/s PIPL and su

rovide meaningfu

based on the an

elp standards, sp

erates safer road

out regularly by

ormation is extra

ubmitted to Mon

ul details.

nalysis of crash r

pecifications, gui

s.

the Team Leade

acted from the M

nitoring Consulta

records and

delines and

r as desired

MPRs of the

ant through

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


Table 5

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


Sr. No. Road

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total

5‐2 gives the sna

Sr. No. Road

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total


d Name MaN

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

B8

pshot of total fat

Ta

d Name MaN

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

B8

Punjab (India)

Table 5‐1 : OPRC

ar. 2013 to Nov. 2013

5

59

3

2

6

6

81

talities on the OP

able 5‐2 : OPRC N

Tota

ar. 2013 to ov. 2013

2

13

0

0

3

5

23

C Network Crash

Dec. 2013 to Nov.2014

0

78

3

3

1

1

86

PRC network yea

Network Fataliti

al Fatalities

Dec. 2013 to Nov.2014

0

9

0

1

0

5

15

91

h Details (Up to S

Dec. 2014 toNov. 2015

7

71

9

4

1

6

98

r wise.

es Details (Up to

on Network

Dec. 2014 toNov. 2015

1

7

0

0

0

0

8

1

September 2016)

o Dec. 201Nov. 20

7

63

2

1

3

2

78

o September 201

k

o Dec. 201Nov. 20

0

15

1

0

2

0

18

)

15 to 016

Total

2

3

16)

15 to 016

To

4

Crashes

19

271

17

10

11

15

343

otal

3

44

1

1

5

10

64

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


5.3 Crash A

The aim of

were first r

crash histo

Total 8

The tot

There w

Where

some u

While t

There h

10 com

65% of

Figure

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


Analysis

f this crash analy

reported by the

ry, the identifica

8 crashes were re

tal number of cra

were no fatal cra

as S2 Section co

urgent road safet

the total number

has been fatal cr

mpared to numbe

f crashes were at

5‐1 to Figure 5‐5


ysis is to examine

contractor. The

tion of any trend

eported on the ne

ashes this year (7

ashes reported in

onstitutes 52.1%

ty measures, esp

r of crashes has c

ash on OPRC net

er of deaths last y

tributed to spee

5 depicts various

Punjab (India)

e the crash histo

re are many fact

d will assist in dev

etwork for report

78) is down by 9,

n the month of Se

of OPRC Netwo

ecially in the wak

come down from

twork for the last

year (8).

ding and overtak

attributes of cra

ory and trends in

tors which contri

veloping strategi

ting month of Se

compared to the

eptember 2016.

rk, it accounted

ke of ensuing win

m previous year, t

t two months, ho

king. 35% of cras

sh statistics.

92

the occurrence

ibute to the occu

ies to decrease th

eptember 2016.

e number of cras

for 80.8% of all

nter/fog season.

he number of fat

owever, total num

hes were single v

2

of these crashes

urrence of road c

he number of roa

shes same time p

crashes and 83.

talities on OPRC

mber of fatalities

vehicle – leaving

s since March 20

crashes. Althoug

ad crashes.

previous year (87

3% of all fatalitie

Network has rise

s in the 4th Year

the carriageway

013 when the cra

gh it’s a very sho

7).

es in the 4th Yea

en sharply.

stands at 18, wh

y.

ash records

rt period of

r, requiring

hich is up by

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


1

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


1.3

106.13

3

44

S1 S2

Lengt

Section


Figure 5‐1: O

7.29 24.971

S3 S

th v Fatalit

Length (L) Fatal

Punjab (India)

OPRC Network –

7 25.341 5

S4 S5

ties

ities (F)

– Section Length

28.65 10

B8

93

v Number of Fat

0.

S

3

talities& Fatality

07

0.12

0

S1 S2

Fata

Fat

y Rates

0.040.01

S3 S4

ality Rates

tality Rate/Year (F)

0.06

0.10

S5 B8 A

s

0.09

AVERAGE

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


LOGY AND MENT LTD.


19

271

11.3

10

S1 S2

Len

Total Cra


Figure 5‐2

17 10

06.13

7.29

2 S3

ngth v Cras

ashes (C) Sectio

Punjab (India)

2: OPRC Network

0 1124.97 25.34

S4 S5

shes

on Length (L)

k – Section Lengt

1528.65

B8

94

th v Number of C

0.47

S1

4

Crashes& Crash R

0.710.65

S2 S3

Crash

Crash

Rates

0.11 0.12

S4 S5

h Rates

Rate/year(R)

0.15

0.47

B8 AVERAG

GE

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


5.4 Trend i

Total 8

There w

Althoug

twice c

The tot

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


in Crashes

8 crashes were re

were no fatal cra

gh there were no

compared to tota

tal number of cra


Figure

eported on the ne

ashes reported in

o deaths on OPRC

al fatalities last ye

ashes this year (7

34

TOT

Punjab (India)

5‐3: OPRC Netw

etwork for report

n September 201

C network for th

ear (8).

78) is down by 9,

43

22

TAL SPEED

Speed

work – Speeding &

ting month of Se

16.

e last two month

compared to the

27

66

DING PERC

ing & Align

95

& Alignment as F

eptember 2016 (A

hs, total number

e number of cras

6

11

CENT RUN‐

nment as

5

Factors in Crashe

All on S2 Road)

of fatalities in th

shes same time p

18

34

‐OFF PERC

Factor

es

he 4th Year stands

previous year (87

4

CENT

s at 18 which are

7).

e more than

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


23

1ST YEAR

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


15

2ND YEA

Toatl Fata


8

AR 3RD Y

alities ‐ Yea

135

1

Punjab (India)

Figure 5

Figure

1

EAR 4TH

ar Wise

23

3950

1123

32

2 3 4

Total Cra

5‐4: OPRC Netwo

5‐5: OPRC Netw

18

YEAR

59 63 6

4049

5

5 6

shes This Y

Third Year

96

ork – Fatality Tre

work – Crash Tren

13

1

S2 S

6874

81

5664

70

7 8 9

Year v Last

Fourth Year

6

end

nd

9

2

Section Fat

8793 98

78

10 11 12

t Year

7

3

talities ‐ Ye

8

2

15

4

ear Wise

5

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


5.5 Road S

Road s

treatm

work‐s

Part 6:

5.6 Road S

Head o

establis

The ma

(mobile

The mo

and un

the inte

The gre

While t

road sa

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


Cras

Fata

afety Audit

afety audit is a p

ent approaches

ites, is carried o

Road Safety Aud

afety Audit Find

on crashes, crash

sh possible trend

ain behavioural

e phone use whil

ost significant ris

nsafe (helmet) dr

ersections, inade

eatest risks are fo

the total number

afety measures.


Dec Jan

shes 5 6

lities 0 0

powerful tool for

such as black sp

ut by the Team

dits, IRC Codes an

ings

hing into slow m

ds in road user be

factor continues

le driving), drivin

sks relate to unsa

rivers/passengers

equate clear zone

or pedestrians, tw

r of crashes has c

Punjab (India)

Table 5‐3 : O

Crashes

n Feb Mar

12 9

10 1

r improving the s

pot treatments w

Leader along wit

nd in accordance

moving vehicle an

ehaviours and de

s to be excessive

ng while intoxicat

afe overtaking m

s, stray animals,

es, hazards in cle

wo‐wheelers and

come down, the

PRC Network – S

s 4th Year (Dec. 2

Apr May Jun

8 9 7

2 3 0

safety of the roa

which is also part

th monthly netw

e with the princip

nd vehicle leavin

eficiencies in road

e speed with tot

ted.

manoeuvres, illeg

poor road work

ear zones, inadeq

d overloaded veh

number of fatalit

97

Summary of Cras

2015 to Nov. 201

ne July Aug

8 6

2 0

ad network in a p

of this contract

work performanc

ples of ‘Safe Syste

ng the carriagew

d safety.

tal disrespect to

al parking, un‐ro

k practices, poor

quate delineation

hicles (with passe

ties on OPRC Net

7

sh Statistics

16)

Sep Oct

8

0

proactive manne

. Road Safety Au

e audit in accord

em Approach’.

ay are predomin

o prevailing cond

oadworthy and o

facilities for vuln

n and signposting

engers and goods

twork has risen s

Nov

78

18

er. It complemen

udit which also in

dance with Austr

nantly reflected

ditions, urge to o

overloaded vehic

nerable road use

g.

s) involved in ove

sharply from 8 to

ts more tradition

ncludes road safe

ralia’s Guide to R

in crashes. MC h

overtake, driver

les, unrestrained

ers, lack of traffic

ertaking manoeu

o 18, calling for so

nal reactive

ety audit of

Road Safety

has tried to

inattention

d (seat belt)

c control at

uvres

ome urgent

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


5.7 Road S

The mo

measu

Police t

Preven

Speed

Improv

Improv

To sup

Contra

their ro

Employ

Institut

Safety

5.8 Way Fo

Till now

Delinea

MC int

season

MC has

Keepin

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


afety Strategies

ost important st

res. Without this

to help educate d

nt driving under t

Zoning and Traff

vement of junctio

vement of curve

port the safe roa

ctors to ensure

oad safety engine

y VMS and Flashi

tional arrangeme

Engineers.

orward

w MC has alread

ation’.

ends to hold wo

.

s introduced stric

g in view the fac


trategy to reduc

s it will be difficu

drivers to comply

he influence of a

fic Calming Meas

ons and intersect

delineation with

ad system concep

compliance to IR

eers to continuou

ing Lights around

ents for technica

y conducted tra

orkshop to enhan

ct compliance of

tors and issues id

Punjab (India)

e crashes on OP

lt to lower crash

y with the rules,

alcohol and enfor

ures on roads pa

tion delineation a

enhanced signag

pt, a strategic app

RC SP ‐55 throug

usly improve imp

d C/D and bridge

l skills developm

ining sessions fo

nce night time de

traffic control an

dentified in Secti

PRC network is t

rates as the maj

as well as enforc

rcement of seatb

assing through to

and signposting.

ge and crash bar

proach is needed

gh deploying app

plementation.

works.

ment by holding w

or the contractor

elineation based

nd TMP at work s

ion 6.7, MC will a

98

towards curbing

ority of the crash

cement.

belt and helmet u

owns and villages

riers at all risky l

d to make roadsid

proved channeliz

workshops, traini

on ‘Safe System

on findings of N

sites and use of p

assist the client in

8

excessive speed

hes are due to ex

use.

s.

ocations identifie

de environment

ation devices in

ing courses for st

m Approach’, ‘Spe

Night Time Inspec

personal protect

n developing the

d through enforc

xcessive speed.

ed by MC.

more forgiving.

and around roa

takeholders ‐ Co

eed Zoning Guide

ction and in view

ion equipment (P

eir road safety str

cement and/or e

d worksites and

ntractor, Counci

elines ‘and ‘Enha

w of forthcoming

PPE) for workers

rategies in Punjab

engineering

by training

ls and Road

anced Curve

g winter/fog

.

b.

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


5.9 Distribu

Distribu

LOGY AND MENT LTD.


ution of fatal cra

ution of Fatal cra


ashes in the OPR

ashes on OPRC N

Punjab (India)

RC network

etwork is illustra

Figure 5‐6

ated in Figure 5‐6

6 : Fatal Crash Lo

99

6 to Figure 5‐11.

cations at Sectio

9

on S1

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


LOGY AND MENT LTD.



Figure 5‐7

7 : Fatal Crash Lo

10

cations at Sectio

00

on S2

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


LOGY AND MENT LTD.



Figure 5‐8

8 : Fatal Crash Lo

10

cations at Sectio

01

on S3

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


LOGY AND MENT LTD.



Figure 5‐9

9 : Fatal Crash Lo

10

cations at Sectio

02

on S4

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


LOGY AND MENT LTD.



Figure 5‐10

0 : Fatal Crash Lo

10

ocations at Sectio

03

on S5

TN

OM

NM TECHNOLMANAGEM


LOGY AND MENT LTD.



Figure 5‐11

1 : Fatal Crash Lo

10

ocations at Sectio

04

on B8

TNM TM


6 CO

6.1

6.1.1

SI. No.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. 6.1.2

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


ONTRACT

Contract’s

1 KeySta

Table 6

Road Mana

Road AssetManager

Senior Site

Site Engine

Site Engine

ConformanUnit

Material En

Contract Fi

Plant & Equ

2 KeySta

SI. No.

1. D(H

2. MSy

3. BrEn

4. RoMCo

5. EnSp

6. So

Y AND NT LTD.


TOR’SSTA

sStaffaspe

affofLead

‐1: Contract

Position

ager

t Manager/R

Engineer

eer (Construc

eer (Mainten

nce Managem

ngineer

nancial Man

uipment Eng

affPresent

Table 6‐2: K

Position

esign EngineHighways)

Management ystem/IT Ma

ridge ngineer/Con

oad Safety Management/onsultant

nvironment pecialist

ocial Speciali

a Bathinda Netwo

AFFAND

erContract

Contractor

or’s Key Staf

N

isk

ction)

ance)

ment

nager

gineer

tatSiteinS

Key Staff of P

n E

eer

nager

sultant

/Design

ist

ork in Punjab (Ind

DCONSTR

tAgreemen

rPresentat

ff as per Con

Numbers

1 M

1 Ja

1 Pu

2 YoPa

Ch

2 Pa

Ra

1 Se

1 Sa

1 Pr

1 R

September2

Professional

New Profengineering C

Staf

Ziauddin A

Gopal K

Rashid N

Dhanraj N

Manoj K

Minati S

dia)

RUCTION

nt

tSiteinthe

ntract Agree

Name of Pe

Mukesh Kuma

askarn Singh

ushpraj Singh

ogender Natandey

hinu Singla

ankaj Kumar

akesh Kumar

ewak Singh S

anjay Pandey

raveen Kaha

K Singh

2016

Engineering

essional Consultant ff

A Khan

hatri

Najfi

Nagdev

umar

Sinha

EQUIPM

emonthofS

ment and Pr

erson M

ar

A

h

h

r

r

Sidhu

y

r

g Consultant

MonitoriR

Despite cocommitmeprofessionavailable arequired bvisits of nemeetings harranged beven after requests, eroad safetyenvironme

MENTS

September2

resent at Site

Monitoring CRema

Full T

Acting as Billials

Full T

Full T

Full T

Full T

Full T

Full T

Full T

Full T

Full T

(PEC)

ing Consultaemarks

ntractual ent that the kals would bes and when y the Client, ew PEC staff ahave not beeby ContractoMC’s repeatespecially fory & ental experts

105

2016

e

Consultant arks

Time

ng Engineer o

Time

Time

Time

Time

Time

Time

Time

Time

Time

ant

key e

and en r ted r

s.

SN

TNM TM


6.2

Sl. No.

Eq

1 Hot M

2 WMM

3 Paver with se(Bitum

4 Hydrau

5 Backho

6 Motor

7 Loader

8 Paver for WM

9 Contrarespon

10 ContraInspecand Di

11 Vibrato

12 Pneum

13 Tipper

14 Water

15 Pavem

16 Bitume

17 Power

18 Falling(Pavemtesting

19 CalibraProfilo

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


Contracto

Table 6

quipment TyCharacteris

ix Plant (Bat

Mixing Plan

Finisher Hydensor controminous Work

ulic Excavato

oes

r Grader

r

Finisher MecMM Work

actor’s patronse vehicles

actor’s generction Vehicleisplacement

ory Rollers

matic Tyre Ro

r/Trucks

r Tanker

ment Marking

en Pressure

r Broom

g Weight Defment deflectg)

ated Roughnometer

Y AND NT LTD.


or’sConstru

6‐3: Construc

ype and stics

ch type)

nt

drostatic ol s)

ors

chanical

l and

ral s (with GPS meters)

oller

g Plant

Distributor

flectometer ion

ness

a Bathinda Netwo

uctionEqui

ction Equipm

As PeAg

MinimumCapacity

100 TPH

60 TPH

100 TPH

1.0 m³ bucket

0.5 m³ bucket

150 kw

1.0 m³ bucket

100 TPH

8‐10 T

8‐10 T

5.5 m³

6 m³

ork in Punjab (Ind

ipment’sSe

ment as per C

er Contract reement

m y

MinimNumb

H 1

1

H 2

2

2

1

2

H 1

2

3

3

2

15

3

1

1

2

1

1

dia)

eptember2

Contract Agr

Pr

mum bers

Capa

128 T& 20TP

250 T

600 T

0.9‐1m

0.5 mbuck

120 m

1.61.7&

m

250T

8‐10

15M

5 14‐24

1200

016

reement/ Pr

resent at Site

city Numb

TPH 00 H

1 ea

TPH 1

TPH 2

1.0 3

3

m³ ket

3

m3/h 3

6‐&2.4 3

5

TPH 1

2

2

0 T 4

MT 1

4 m3 33

00L 4

1

3

2

1

1

resent at Site

e

bers

ach

3

106

e

Remarks

TNM TM


6.3

SI No.

1

2

3

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

6.4

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


Contracto

P

Road Mana

CMU, Team

Field Engin

HR& Adm.

Road Asset

Plant & Eq

Contract Fi

Road Safet

Billing/QS

Quality Con

Reviewof

Monitoring Contract Aghas not chaengineers frMonitoring found that twith the critto the Emplquality of do

One significAsset ManaManager ancritical for thqualification

Y AND NT LTD.


or’sStaffPr

Table 6‐4

Position

ager

m Leader

neer

t Manager

uipment Eng

inancial Man

ty officer

ntrol In‐char

fContracto

Consultant hreement andnged from wrom the siteConsultant fthe qualificateria, containoyer and thocuments an

ant issue whager in the nd Billing Enhe success ons and exper

a Bathinda Netwo

resent–Sep

4 : Contact N

Muk

S. S.

Pank

Parv

Jask

gineer R. K

nager Parv

Ram

Jask

rge Sanj

or’sStaff

has undertakd actual preswhat was ree. The CVs for review. Mations and exned in the coeir advice isnd workmans

hich has beeContractor’

ngineer whicof this projecience as per

ork in Punjab (Ind

ptember20

No. of Contra

Name of Pe

kesh Kumar

Sidhu

kaj Kumar

veen Kahar

karan Singh

. Singh

veen Kahar

mesh Patil

karan Singh

jay Pandey

ken a reviewsent at the siported prevof the newMonitoring Cxperience ofontract. Mon still awaitedship.

en highlightes Staff. Oneh affects thct that the cothe Contrac

dia)

016

actor’s Staff

rson

w of the Contte in the moious month.

wly appointeConsultant hf the replacenitoring Consd. Deploying

ed repeatede engineer e performanontractor apct Agreement

Present at S

Contact

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

8288032

tractor’s Keyonth of Septe. Contractor ed engineershad revieweded engineerssultant’s obsg such staff h

dly is that thhas dual chnce of Assetpoints a full t.

ite

No.

760

757

763

780

796

782

780

778

796

753

y Staff requirember 2016.has replaces were submd the credens were not iervations wehas detrime

he there is nharges workt Managemetime Asset M

107

Remarks

red as per th The situatioed some of itmitted to thntials and han accordancere submittental effect o

no permanenking as Asseent. It is verManager wit

he on ts he ad ce ed on

nt et ry th

TNM TM


7 PA

7.1

Thi

the

incl

As

Pav

rec

Con

7.2

Sl. No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


AYMENTS

NetworkP

s Chapter de

e Contractor'

ludes curren

per the Gen

vement Roug

ommends to

ntractor:

i.

ii.

Financial

During the m28 is as belo

Value of WImproveme

Value of WRehabilitat

Value of WResurfacing

Value of WEmergency

Value of WNetwork Pe

Value of Wperforman

Value of WVariation

Y AND NT LTD.


S

Performan

escribes the

's next paym

nt description

neral Condit

ghness and P

o the Emplo

Provisional

CONFORMA

Contractor h

to process t

the absence

Monitoring

requirement

has failed t

software av

withheld.

Progresso

month of Sepow:

Descriptio

Work executeent

Work executetion

Work executeg

Work executey

Work executeerformance

Work executece achievem

Work execute

Total

a Bathinda Netwo

nceforthem

recommend

ment corresp

n of the Claim

tions of the

Pavement De

oyer to con

payment for

ANCES.

has procured

he collected

e of the req

Consultant

ts. Despite

o the softw

vailable at th

ofOPRCTill

ptember 201

on

d for

d for

d for

d for

d for Month

d for monthment

d for Under

ork in Punjab (Ind

monthofSe

dation of the

ponding to t

ms submitted

Contract A

eflections ha

sider any of

r the month

d the profilo

d roughness d

quired softw

and therefo

Monitoring

ware availabl

he OPRC site

lDate

16, the IPC‐28

ValuDone

1, 91

733

96

ly 402

ly 261

3,40

dia)

eptember2

Monitoring

he Month o

d by the Con

Agreement a

ave yet to be

f the follow

of Septemb

ometer at th

data has not

ware, the IR

ore cannot b

Consultant

e at the pro

e, it is recom

8 was proces

ue of Work e up to Date

11, 296, 720

3,571,734

6,041,591

‐

2,881,964

1,532,783

‐

05,324,792

016

Consultant

of Septembe

ntractor to th

nd consider

e collected, t

wing alternat

ber 2016 cor

e OPRC proj

t been arran

I data could

be accepted

repeated re

oject site. U

mmended th

ssed. The fin

Value oDone previo

1,861, 0

733,57

96,04

‐

374,03

242,34

‐

3,306,9

regarding th

r 2016. This

he Client.

ring that the

he Monitorin

tives for pay

rresponding

ject site but

ged at the p

d not be ve

d to fulfil th

eminders, th

Until the tim

hat some am

nancial progr

of Work up to us IPC

000, 922

71,734

1,591

‐

37,804

43,821

‐

995,872

108

he approval o

Chapter als

e data of th

ng Consultan

yment to th

to 144 NON

the softwar

project site. I

erified by th

e contractu

he Contracto

e, makes th

mount may b

ress upto IPC

This bill amount (Rs.

50,295,798

‐

‐

‐

28,844,160

19,188,962

‐

98,328,920

of

so

he

nt

he

N‐

re

In

he

al

or

he

be

C‐

.)

8

0

2

0

TNM TM


7.3

Sl. No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sl. No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


Manhour

The Summ

during the

Tab

Employee N

Yogendra B

‐

Harpreet Si

Dr. Sohan S

Dr. Vinay M

Dr. Asha Sh

Table

Employee N

Deepak Kum

Varinder Si

Happy Sing

Dr Rajni Sar

Rohit Jinda

Gadi Moshe

Emilia De L

Note: Only

Y AND NT LTD.


rsofMonito

mary of the

e Month of S

le 7‐1 : Man

Name

Bhatnagar

ngh

Singh Seehra

Maitri

arma

7‐2 : Man Ho

Name D

mar P

ngh CS

gla AA

rangal S

l H

el S

a Ossa HE

actual work

a Bathinda Netwo

oringConsu

inputs of t

September 2

n Hours (for t

De

Project MTeam Lea

OPRC OpSpecialist

Principal

PavemenSpecialist

Data Ana

Environm

ours (for the

Designation

Project Engin

CAD Expert/LSurveyor

AM‐Accounts/Ad

Secretary/As

Head Clerk

Senior Engin

Hydraulic/DrExpert

king days are

ork in Punjab (Ind

ultantStaff

the Monitor

2016 is given

the month o

esignation

Manager cumader

perational t/Asset Man

Auditor

nt Design t

alyst/Statistic

mental Specia

Tota

e month of S

neer

Land

dministrator

ssistant

eer

rainage

TOTAL (B

e included in

dia)

f

ing Consulta

in Table 7.1

of Septembe

Man HourHom

m 1

ager

1

cian

alist

al (A)

September 2

Man HoIn Hom

2

14

16

17

17

B) 6

man hours,

ant’s team i

and 7.2.

r 2016) – Ke

rs/Days In me Office

128/16

‐

128/16

‐

‐

16/2

272

2016) – Non

ours/Days me Office

24/3

44/18

68/21

76/22

76/22

‐

‐

688

Holidays ar

n terms of

y Experts

Man Hours/DaysOn Field

48/6

‐

48/6

‐

‐

‐

96

Key Experts

Man Hours/DaOn Field

168/21

32/4

8/1

‐

‐

‐

‐

208

re not consid

109

man – hou

s Total MaHours

176

‐

176

‐

‐

16

368

ys d

TotalMan Hours

192

176

176

176

176

‐

‐

896

dered

rs

an

l

s

TNM TM


8 CL

8.1

8.2

8.3

8.4

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


LAIMSAN

This secti

connectio

difference

referred i

matter is

DisputeR

Dispute R

There is n

There was

Arbitratio

Arbitratio

Mr MS Gu

There is a

PIPL), aris

detailed i

hearings s

15 and 16

The next h

Minuteso

There was

Minuteso

There was

Y AND NT LTD.


NDDISPU

on deals wit

on with or ar

e by mutua

in writing by

referred to t

ReviewBoa

eview Board

no dispute pe

s no meeting

onTribuna

on Tribunal c

uram.

an Arbitratio

sing out price

n PCC of the

so far. The A

6 July 2016 a

hearing is sc

ofArbitralT

s no meeting

ofDisputeR

s no meeting

a Bathinda Netwo

UTES

th the dispu

rising out of

l consultatio

y either par

the Arbitratio

rd(DRB)

d (DRB) comp

ending betwe

g/visit of DRB

al

consists of D

on Case betw

e adjustmen

e contract. T

Arbitral Tribu

nd there hav

heduled to b

TribunalM

g in the mon

ReviewBoa

g in the mon

ork in Punjab (Ind

te of any ki

f the Contrac

on, then the

rty to the Di

on Tribunal.

prises of Mr

een the Emp

B in the mon

Dr PC Markan

ween Claima

t formula, co

The case is w

unal had hea

ve been no m

be held in De

eeting

th of Septem

ardMeeting

th of Septem

dia)

nd between

ct. If the pa

e matter in

isputes Revi

RP Indoria, M

ployer and th

nth of Septem

nda, Mr KB

ant (Chief En

ontained in t

with the Arbi

rd the argum

meetings sinc

ecember 201

mber 2016.

g

mber 2016.

the Employ

rties fail to

dispute sha

ew Board a

Mr HP Jamda

he Contracto

mber 2016.

Lal Singhal (

ngineer, PW

the clause 4

itration Tribu

ments of the

ce then.

16.

yer and the

resolve such

all, in the fi

nd if still un

ar and Mr RP

or.

(Presiding Ar

WD) and Resp

48.1 of GCC a

unal. There

e respondent

110

Contractor i

h a dispute o

irst place, b

nresolved th

P Singh.

rbitrator) an

pondent (M/

and as furthe

have been 1

t’s counsel o

in

or

be

he

nd

/s

er

14

on

TNM TM


9 ME

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


EETINGS

Monitoring

Leader, Yo

Septembe

Team and

The Monit

the non‐co

Agreemen

Y AND NT LTD.


/INSPEC

g Consultant

ogendra Bhat

r 2016. Findi

Project Man

oring Consu

onformance

t.

MC E

a Bathinda Netwo

TIONSHE

t team, consi

tnagar, inspe

ings of their

nager on 16th

ltant conduc

report on 10

Environment

ork in Punjab (Ind

ELDDUR

isting of Env

ected the OP

inspection w

h September

cted the mon

0 September

al Consultan

dia)

RINGTHE

ironmental E

PRC network

were discusse

r 2016.

nthly audit o

r 2016 to fulf

nt inspecting

EMONTH

Expert, Asha

and M/s PIP

ed with M/s

f the OPRC n

fil the require

Camp Site

H

Sharma and

PL’s camp site

PIPL Environ

network and

ement of the

111

d Team

e on 15

nmental

submitted

e Contract

TNM TM


10 COCO

10.1

Sl. No.

DispD

1 1/9

2 1/9

3 1/9

4 1/9

5 3/9

6 5/9

7 5/9

8 6/9

9 7/9

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


ORRESPOONSULTA

Correspon

patched Date

9/2016 T

9/2016 T

9/2016 T

9/2016 T

9/2016 T

9 /2016 T

9/2016 T

9/2016 T

9/2016 T

Y AND NT LTD.


ONDENCEANT

ndenceSen

Letter N

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

a Bathinda Netwo

E DONE

nt

Table 10

No.

538/2016

539/2016

540/2016

537/2016

541/2016

537/2016

542/2016

543/2016

544/2016

ork in Punjab (Ind

E BY T

0‐1 : Corresp

Variation Orlanning roadSunam‐BhikS2) in cheem39+300 to C

Variation Orlanning roadSunam‐Bhikin Bhikhi towto Ch. 55+70

Variation Orlanning roadSunam‐Bhikin Maur towto Ch. 86+06

Exclusion of 86+060 of BBhikhi‐Kotshfrom4th yearprogrammework progra

Interim paym

Exclusion of 86+060 of BBhikhi‐Kotsh4th year wor

Interim Paym

Rate Analysi1.Cheema 2sections of BBhikhi‐kotsh

Rate Analysi1.Cheema 2sections of BBhikhi‐kotsh

dia)

THE OF

ondence Sen

Subject

rder no.6 ford of Bhawanihi‐kotshamirma town fromh. 40+700

rder no.5 ford of Bhawanihi‐kotshamirwn from Ch.00

rder no.7: Fod of Bhawanihi‐kotshamir

wn from Ch. 860

Ch. 84+030 hawanigarh‐hamir (S2) ror work (i.e. 3rd year amme)

ment Certific

Ch 84+030 thawanigarh‐hamir (S2) rok programm

ment Certific

is: For 4 lann.Bhikhi 3.MaBhawanigarhhamir Road(S

is: For 4 lann.Bhikhi 3.MaBhawanigarhhamir Road(S

FFICE O

nt

r 4‐igarh‐r road( m Ch.

T

r 4‐igarh‐r road S2 54+030

T

or 4‐igarh‐r road S2 84+030

T

to Ch. ‐Sunam‐oad

revised

T

cate ‐ 27 T

to Ch.‐Sunam‐oad from e

T

cate ‐ 27 T

ning of aur Road h‐Sunam‐S2)

T

ning of aur Road h‐Sunam‐S2)

T

OF MON

Sent By

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

112

NITORING

Sent T

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ChiefEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r Patel infPvt. Lt

G

To

ive er

ive er

ive er

ive er

ive er

f er

ive er

ive er

fra. td

TNM TM


10 9/9

11 9/9

12 12/

13 14/

14 16/

15 16/

16 16/

17 16/

18 19/

19 16/

20 20/

21 19/

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


9/2016 T

9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

Y AND NT LTD.


TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

a Bathinda Netwo

545/2016

546/2016

547/2016

548/2016

549/2016

551/2016

552/2016

553/2016

554/2016

550/2016

557/2016

555/2016

ork in Punjab (Ind

Adjusted Mofor the mon

Hindrance dbetween Ch(Gharachon

Releasing ofthe works co2nd and 3rd yprogramme

6thNight InspAugust 2016

Submission for the Mon

Improvemenunder 4th ye– proposal fretaining wa

ConstructionBhawanigarKotshamir Rtown at Ch.

Pending Wo

Regarding thexpenses fooffice boy anoffice Sangrof amount.

Submission camp (13th R

Regarding afor wideningroad Ch. 53+69+800, 73+B8 road cha

Submission reports for Asurface and month of JuAwareness C

dia)

onthly Audit th of August

due to utilitie. 8+400 to 9+area)

f retention Mompleted unear work .

pection Repo6

of MPR of Mth of August

nt Works Exear work progor constructalls n of new culvh – Sunam –Road (S2) in s26+150

orks

he approval r the servicend sweeper ur‐ Reimburs

of HSE AwarRound)

pproved drag of bridges o+400, 54+040+450, 100+70inage 20+60

of MonitorinAAQ, ANL, soground wately 2016. HSECamp report

Results t 2016

T

es +400

T

Money for nder 1st,

T

ort – T

M/s PIPL t 2016

T

ecuted gramme ion of

T

vert on – Bhikhi – sunam

T

T

of es of at TNM sement

T

reness T

wings on S2 0, 00 and 0

T

ng oil er for the E t

T

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

113

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r ExecutiEngine

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r ExecutiEngine

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r Patel infPvt. Lt

fra. td

ive er

ive er

ive er

ive er

fra. td

ive er

fra. td

fra. td

ive er

fra. td

fra. td

TNM TM


22 20/

23 21/

24 21/

25 21/

26 26/

27 20/

28 30/

29 30/

10.2

Sl. No.

1

2

3

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 T

/9/2016 P

/9/2016 P

/9/2016 P

Correspon

Date On Letter

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

Y AND NT LTD.


TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

TNM/OPRC/5

PIPL/OPRC/5

PIPL/OPRC/5

PIPL/OPRC/5

ndenceRec

Lett

1

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

a Bathinda Netwo

558/2016

559/2016

560/2016

561/2016

562/2016

556/2016

564/2016

563/2016

ceived

Table 10‐2

ter No.

1737

RC/989/2016

RC/988/2016

ork in Punjab (Ind

Laying of WMroad betweeCh. 105+000observation

Submission Report (MPRmonth of Au

IPC ‐ 28

Reconstruct29/2 on BathSabo (B8) ro

Audit lengthSeptember 2

Invoice No. Tfor the perioto 31st Augus

Submission

Submission of bridge at

: Correspon

Regardinexpensesoffice boTNM M.C

Hindrancbetween( Gharac

ConstrucCh. 26+1

dia)

MM top layeen Ch. 103+90(LHS) – Site s of Monthly PR) no 23 for tugust 2016

ion of Culvehinda to Talwoad

hs for the mo2016

TNM/0045 &od: 1st Augusst 2016

of work prog

of work progCh. 53+400

ndence Rece

Subject

ng the approvs for the servoy and sweepC Office

ce due to utin Ch. 8+400 thon Area)

ction of culve150

er on S2 900 to

T

Progress the

T

T

rt no wandi

T

onth of T

& 0046 st 2016

T

gramme T

gramme T

ived

val of vice of per at

lities to 9+400

ert at

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Team Leade

Received Date

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

114

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r ExecutiEngine

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r Patel infPvt. Lt

r ProjecDirecto

r ExecutiEngine

r ExecutiEngine

Remarks

Received

Received

Received

fra. td

ive er

fra. td

fra. td

fra. td

ct or

ive er

ive er

s

d

d

d

TNM TM


4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


1/9/2016

1/9/2016

30/8/2016

30/8/2016

8/8/2016

3/9/2016

5/9/2016

5/9/2016

5/9/2016

13/9/2016

13/9/2016

13/9/2016

Y AND NT LTD.


PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

1

1

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

a Bathinda Netwo

RC/987/2016

RC/986/2016

RC/985/2016

RC/984/2016

RC/969/2016

RC/992/2016

1766

1788

C/492A/2016

RC/995/2016

RC/996/2016

RC/997/2016

ork in Punjab (Ind

Submissidepth of KotshamSangrur –

Various cissues anMEC mee

NetworkData Ana

OrganizaAwareneNo.14

RegardinStretch.

SubmissiPerformaReport foAugust 2

Release oheld for improvem1st year 2

Variationlanning r– SunamKotshamBhikhi to54+030 torder noof BhawaBhikhi – in Cheem39+300 tOrder noroad of BSunam –Road (S2from Ch.

6 RegardinRetentio

SubmissiBlack Spo

SubmissiMajor ju

Time framdeadlineBank ImpMission

dia)

ion of Mean f Bhawanigarmir S2 road a– Sunam S1

critical pendnd notificatioeting

k Informationalysis ation of HSE/ess Camp Rou

ng Report on

ion of Netwoance Inspector the month2016

of retention rehabilitatioment work f2nd year and 3

n Order no 5 road of Bhaw – Bhikhi –

mir Road (S2) own from Chto 55+700. Vo 6 for 4 laninanigarh – SuKotshamirroma town fromto 40+700. Vo 7 for 4 lannBhawanigarh– Bhikhi – Kot2) in Maur to 84+030 to 8

ng Release ofn Money

ion of Designot Improvem

ion of Designnctions me for meet as per 17th Wplementation

Profile rh to nd road

ing on of

n and

/ AIDS und

BC

ork tion h of

money n and or the 3rd year.

for 4 wanigarh

in . Variation ng road nam – oad (S2) m Ch. Variation ning h – tshamir wn 86+060.

f

n for ment

n for

ting World n

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

1/9/2016

05/9/2016

06/9/2016

7/9/2016

9/9/2016

14/9/2016

14/9/2016

14/9/2016

115

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

TNM TM


16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


13/9/2016

13/9/2016

17/9/2016

17/9/2016

19/9/2016

19/9/2016

12/9/2016

19/9/2016

21/9/2016

21/9/2016

24/9/2016

24/9/2016

26/9/2016

26/9/2016

Y AND NT LTD.


PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPR

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

1

1

PIPL/OPRC

1

1

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

a Bathinda Netwo

RC/999/2016

RC/998/2016

C/1000/2016

C/1001/2016

C/1003/2016

1870

1852

C/1005/2016

1906

1907

C/1007/2016

C/1008/2016

C/1009/2016

C/1010/2016

ork in Punjab (Ind

ObservatEnvironmComplian

SubmissiMonth o

6 SubmissiDevelopm

6 MethodoRutting/Con S4 Ro

6 IPC ‐ 28

Regardindrawingsbridges o53+400, 73+450, road cha

SubmissiProgressno.22 for2016

6

ComplianMonthly no.22 for2016

Regardin

Improveexecutedwork profor constwalls

6 Submissiprogram

6

Laying ofS2 road b103+900Site obse

6 Re‐subm

6 Submissiprogram53+400

dia)

tions of MC’smental Expernce

ion of MPR fof August 201

ion of Greenment Plan

ology for Camber Corroad Km 10 to

ng approved s for wideninon S2 road C54+040, 69+100+700 andinage 20+60

ion of Month Report (MPr the month

nce of MC’s Progress repr the month

ng black Spot

ment works d under 4th Yeogramme – ptruction of re

ion of work me (Bridges

f WMM top between Ch.0 to 105+000ervations

mission of IPC

ion of work me of bridge

s rt for

or the 16

Belt

rection o 12

ng of h. +800, d B8 00

hly R) of July

port of July

ts

ear proposal etaining

)

layer on

0 LHS –

C‐28

e at Ch.

14/9/2016

15/9/2016

19/9/2016

19/9/2016

19/9/2016

20/9/2016

14/9/2016

22/9/2016

23/9/2016

23/9/2016

24/9/2016

24/9/2016

26/9/2016

26/9/2016

116

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

TNM TM


30

31

32

33

34

TECHNOLOGYMANAGEMEN


26/9/2016

28/9/2016

30/9/2016

30/9/2016

30/9/2016

Y AND NT LTD.


PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

PIPL/OPRC

a Bathinda Netwo

C/1011/2016

C/1012/2016

C/1013/2016

C/1014/2016

C/1015/2016

ork in Punjab (Ind

6

Re‐ schedIncomple

6

Submissiconstrucon BathinSabo roa

6 Methodorectificat96+700 t

6

Non Shiftbetweento 9+400S2 road

6 Traffic S

dia)

duling of Minete works

ion of estimation of new nda – Talwanad(B8)

ology and uption from Kmto 100+430 S

ting of utilityn Km 40‐45 &0 Ghrachon a

urvey

nor

ate for culvert ndi

pdate of m S2 road

y & 8+400 area on

26/9/2016

29/9/2016

3/10/2016

3/10/2016

3/10/2016

117

Received

Received

Received

Received

Received

d

d

d

d

d

government of p unjab - punjab roads & …prbdb.gov.in/files/tnm/mpr sep 2016.pdf ·...

Documents