government of nepal ministry of agriculture development
TRANSCRIPT
Government of Nepal
Ministry of Agriculture Development
High Value Agriculture Project in
Hill and Mountain Areas
(HVAP)
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT(Fiscal Year 2011/12)
Project Management Unit (PMU)Birendranagar, Surkhet, Nepal
Phone: 00977 83 520038, Fax: 00977 83 525403
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.hvap.gov.np
September, 2012
Loan No.: 796-NP Grant No.: DSF-8050-NP
Implementing Partners
Government of Nepal
HIGH VALUE AGRICULTURE PROJECT IN HILL
AND MOUNTAIN AREAS (HVAP)
Project Management Unit Birendranagar, Surkhet, Nepal
Phone No.:977-83-520038, Fax No.:977-83-525403
Email:[email protected]
www.hvap.gov.np
Country
Title of
Project
Project
Donor A
Executi
Partner
Locatio
Fiscal Ye
Reporti
Year of
Total Pr
Total Bu
Cumula
Date of
Date of
Project
Date of
Financia
Cumula
Year (N
Househ
No. of W
No. of D
y
the Report
Title
Number
Agency
ng Agency
rs
n of the Proj
ear
ng Period
Implementa
roject Budge
udget for 2nd
ative Budget
f Loan Effecti
f Project Star
Duration
f Project Clos
al Achieveme
ative Financia
Rs.)
holds covered
Women Bene
Dalits and Jan
Planned
Achieve
Am
ou
nt
NR
s. i
n M
illi
on
Cu
ject
ation
et (US$) d year (NRs.)
till 2nd Year
iveness
rt
sing
ent of Repor
al Achieveme
d till reportin
eficiaries
najatis
Chart 1: Cum
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
d NRs. In Milllio
d NRs. In Millio
umulative Fin
Annual Prog
rs (NRs.)
rting Year (N
ent Till Repo
ng year
mulative Fina
Componen
1
on 82.8
on 67
nancial Plann
gress Report
Nep
Annu
High
Mou
Loan
Gran
Inter
Deve
Mini
Gove
SNV-9 Dist
and o
Regio
2011
16 Ju
2nd Y
18.8
196.
241.
5 Jul
5 Jul
6 Ye
30 S
Rs.) 86.3
orting 114.
1451
hous
47%
22%
ancial Achiev
nt Compone
2
71.4
2.67
ned VS Achie
2011-12/HV
al
ual Progress
h Value Agric
untain Areas
n No.: 796-N
nt No.: DSF-8
rnational Fun
elopment (IF
istry of Agric
ernment of N
-Nepal and Atricts from the
one District from
on of Nepal
1/12
uly 2011 to 1
Year
87 Million
83 Million
15 Million
ly 2010
ly 2010
ars
eptember 20
1 Million (43
36 Million (4
1 Household
seholds)
(Target 60%
(Target 25%
vement till 15
ent Compon
3
87.0
44.82
evement By C
VAP
Report
culture Proje
(HVAP)
P
8050-NP
nd for Agricu
FAD)
cultural Deve
Nepal
Agro EnterprMid-Western D
m the Far-West
15 July 2012
017
3.85%)
47.42%)
s (Total Targ
%)
%)
5 July 2012
ent Tota
241.1
2 114.3
Components
ct In Hill and
ultural
elopment,
rise Centre Development Re
tern Developme
get is 15300
al
15
35
s
i
d
egion
ent
ii Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Ackno
It is our
HVAP in
this per
despite
caused d
I would
Chairpe
providin
the proj
Mid We
Coordin
suggesti
Likewise
officials
stakeho
I would
Manage
support
Finally,
achieve
hard wo
Rajendr
Project
owledgem
r pleasure t
ncluding out
riod, the pr
having to fa
delay in full
like to than
rson of the
ng direction
ject. Simila
estern Dev
ation Grou
ions and gu
e, I would li
for providi
lders at var
like to th
er, Country
mission tea
I would lik
ments durin
ork in prepa
a Prasad Bh
Manager
ment
to present
tcomes and
oject has m
ace several
l implement
nk the hono
e Project St
s, guidance
rly, my sinc
velopment
up (PCCG)
uidance for e
ke to thank
ng supports
rious levels
ank IFAD,
y Program
ams for the
ke to thank
ng last year
aring this re
hari
Annual Prog
the annual
d achieveme
made progr
administra
tation.
orable Secre
eering Com
e and critica
cere thanks
Region an
and all t
effective im
k the projec
s in the pro
who provid
the donor
Coordinato
eir regular g
k all the H
r. My speci
port.
gress Report
l progress r
ents realize
ess on prep
tive and pr
etary of Mi
mmittee (PS
al suggestion
s also go to
d Chairper
he membe
mplementat
ct implemen
oject implem
ded support
of the pro
or, and pro
uidance, su
VAP team
al thanks go
2011-12/HV
report of FY
ed till the e
paratory w
ocedural co
nistry of Ag
C) and all t
ns for the s
o the Regio
rson of the
ers of the
ion of the p
nting partn
mentation.
ts during the
oject, partic
oject super
upports and
for their c
o to M&E t
VAP
Y 2011/12
nd of this f
orks for fie
omplexities
gricultural D
the membe
uccessful im
onal Directo
e Project C
PCCG, fo
project.
ers – SNV a
I am also th
e reporting
cularly its C
rvision and
cooperatio
collective e
team of the
of
iscal year. D
eld level act
which even
Developmen
ers of the P
mplementat
or of Agricu
Consultativ
or their va
and AEC and
hankful to p
year.
Country Pro
implemen
on.
fforts to ge
e project fo
September
Surkhet,
iii
During
tivities
ntually
nt and
PSC for
tion of
ulture,
e and
luable
d their
project
ogram
ntation
et the
r their
r, 2012
Nepal
iv Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP v
Table of Contents
Contents
Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................................ iii
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................... v
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... ix
A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1
B. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT .......................................................................................................... 4
C. RESULTS OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................................... 5
C1. OUTCOMES ........................................................................................................................... 5
C2. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE YEAR 2011/12 .................................................................... 8
1 PRO-POOR VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................... 8
2 INCLUSION AND SUPPORT FOR VALUE CHAIN INITIATIVES................................................... 16
2.1: Group Formation and Strengthening ................................................................................ 16
2.2: Social and Gender Inclusion .............................................................................................. 18
2.3: Production and Post Harvest Support: .............................................................................. 18
2.4: Value Chain Fund: .............................................................................................................. 22
2.5: District Participation and Spatial Inclusion Fund: .............................................................. 24
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT, M&E AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT .................................... 24
3.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................... 24
3.2 MONITORING & EVALUATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT .................................... 29
C3. FINANCIAL ACHIEVEMENT .................................................................................................. 32
D. CONCLUDING REMARKS ........................................................................................................... 35
E. LESSON LEARNT ........................................................................................................................ 35
F. WAY FORWARDS ...................................................................................................................... 36
G. ANNEXES: .................................................................................................................................. 37
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Areas (Corridors and Districts) __________________________________________ 2
Figure 2: Project Components ________________________________________________________ 2
Figure 3: Implementation Arrangement ________________________________________________ 4
Figure 4: Programme Implementation Procedures/Steps __________________________________ 4
Figure 5: Human Resource Management Plan ___________________________________________ 7
Figure 6: Spider web diagram of DCCIs Self- Assessment __________________________________ 15
Figure 7: Procedures for Production and Post Harvest Support Fund ________________________ 19
Figure 8: Grant Application and Business Plan Approval Procedures ________________________ 23
Figure 9: Decentralized Data Collection System _________________________________________ 40
Figure 10: Data and Information Collection, and Dissemination ____________________________ 41
Figure 11: Knowledge Management System ___________________________________________ 42
vi Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
List of Tables
Table 1: Number of participants in Value Chain Stakeholders Consultation workshops ___________ 9
Table 2: No. of participants in Agribusiness-producers interaction programme ________________ 10
Table 3: List of Potential Agribusinesses by value chains __________________________________ 12
Table 4: List of the Selected Value Chains by Agribusiness Opportunity Workshops _____________ 13
Table 5: Name and Address of Groups ________________________________________________ 17
Table 6: Name and Address of the Cooperatives ________________________________________ 17
Table 7: Project Beneficiary Households by ethnic category _______________________________ 20
Table 8: Participants of different training by gender and ethnic category ____________________ 21
Table 9: Financial Achievement of the Fiscal year 2011/12 ________________________________ 32
Table 10: Cumulative Financial Achievement ___________________________________________ 33
Table 11: IFAD Grant and Loan Disbursements (In SDR, up to 15/7/2012) ____________________ 35
List of the Boxes
Box 1 AGRIBUSINESS SHORT LISTING CRITERIA _________________________________________ 11
Box 2 HIGHLIGHTS OF GSI STRATEGIES ________________________________________________ 18
List of Charts
Chart 1: Cumulative Financial Achievement till 15 July 2011 ___________________________________ i
Chart 2: Project benefited Households by social category Chart 3: Project benefited by Gender ___ 6
Chart 4: Training participants by gender Chart 5: Training participants by social category _______ 6
Chart 6: Stakeholders’ workshops participants by gender Chart 7: participants by social category 10
Chart 8: Interaction workshops participants by gender Chart 9: Interaction workshops participants
by social category ________________________________________________________________ 11
Chart 10: Financial Achievement by Components during the Fiscal Year 2011/12 ______________ 33
Chart 11: Financial Planned VS Achieved By Partners during the Fiscal Year 2011/12 ___________ 34
Chart 12: Cumulative Financial Planned VS Achieved By Partners during the period of two years __ 34
List of Annex
Annex 1: Present status of Value Chains ............................................................................................... 37
Annex 2: List of the project staff ........................................................................................................... 38
Annex 3: Highlights of comprehensive monitoring and evaluation in HVAP ........................................ 39
Annex 4: Result Chain of Apple, Vegetable seed and Ginger Value Chain ............................................ 43
Annex 5: Input support to producer groups/cooperatives .................................................................... 46
Annex 6: Revised logframe of the project ............................................................................................. 47
Annex 7: Detail of physical and financial progress ............................................................................... 52
Annex 8: List of procured vehicles and materials .................................................................................. 79
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP vii
Acronyms
4S -Surya Social Society Service, A local NGO of Jumla
AEC -Agro- Enterprise Centre
ANSAB -Asian Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources
DADC -District Agriculture Development Committee
DADO -District Agriculture Development Office
DCCI -District Chamber of Commerce and Industry
DCED -Donor Committee for Enterprise Development
DFO -District Forest Office
DLSO -District Livestock Service Office
EoI - Expression of Interest
FNCCI -Federation of Nepal Chambers of Commerce and Industry
GeSI - Gender and Social Inclusion
GoN -Government of Nepal
HVAP -High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas
IFAD -International Fund for Agriculture Development
KM -Knowledge Management
M&E -Monitoring and Evaluation
MAPs -Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
MIS -Management Information System
MoAD -Ministry of Agricultural Development
NGO -Non Government Organization
NTFPs -Non Timber Forest Products
PCCG -Project Coordination and Consultation Group
PIM -Project Implementation Manual
PMU -Project Management Unit
PSC -Project Steering Committee
RD -Regional Directorate
RIMS -Result and Impact Monitoring System
SEAN -Seed Enterprise Association Nepal
SNV -Netherlands Development Organization
ToR -Terms of Reference
VC -Value Chain
VCA -Value Chain Analysis
viii Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP ix
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) is a joint endeavor of
Government of Nepal (GoN) and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and being
executed by Ministry of Agricultural Development (MoAD) in partnership with Netherlands
Development Organization (SNV) and Agro-Enterprise Center (AEC) of the Federation of Nepalese
Chamber of Commerce and Industries (FNCCI). It has completed its second year of implementation
and the reporting period covers project activities from July 16, 2011 to July 15, 2012.
During the reporting period, seven agribusinesses have submitted business plans and have shown
interests for partnerships with the project in three value chains (apple, vegetables seeds and
ginger). Contract has been facilitated between cooperatives, SEAN Seed Service Centre and
vegetable seed producing groups in Jumla. The project consulted and facilitated with B.H.
Enterprise to link with apple producers in Jumla, though formal contracts could not be made. The
capacity of five District Chambers of Commerce and Industries (DCCIs) namely, Jumla, Dailekh,
Salyan, Surkhet and Achham was assessed and facilitated to develop their capacity strengthening
plans. Value Chain (VC) analysis was completed for four Value Chains viz. (i) goat, (ii) turmeric, (iii)
off-season vegetables (tomato, cauliflower/cabbage and bean/pea pod), and (iv) timur. Value Chain
intervention strategies and action plans were developed for the first three value chains (ginger,
apple and vegetable seeds) and will be completed shortly for the next four Value Chains along with
the field activities.
Gender and Social Inclusion (GeSI) strategy for HVAP has been prepared and endorsed from Project
Steering Committee (PSC). Similarly, Institutional and Capacity Development Strategy for the
project has been drafted. Training modules on GeSI, VC Development, skill development and
production/post-harvest have also been developed. The project started some field level activities in
off-season vegetable, apple and turmeric value chains covering 1,451 households from six groups
and eight cooperatives in Jumla, Dailekh and Surkhet districts in coordination with respective
District Agriculture Development Offices (DADOs). The producer farmers were supported with
production inputs and services through production and post harvest support fund. Of the total
participating households, 13% households were from Dalits, 9% Janajatis and 78% other castes.
Under the same fund, 159 producers were trained in apple orchard management, leader farmers’,
turmeric production and vegetable production in Jumla, Dailekh and Surkhet districts. Participation
of women in these trainings was 53 %., and 22 % were Dalits and Janajatis.
The project prepared and published the Project Implementation Manual (PIM) and contracted four
experts (High Value Agriculture Production Specialist, Gender Social Inclusion and Group
Development Expert, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Expert, and Funds and Contracts Manager),
which were the pre-conditions for the first withdrawal (initial advance) from IFAD. As per the
recommendation of the second supervision mission, the project log-frame has been revised to
improve the component-level indicators without changing the project goal and purpose. It has
developed a comprehensive M&E system. The M&E system so developed would be able to meet
the need of Government of Nepal (GoN), Result and Impact Monitoring System (RIMS) and the
Value Chain monitoring, following the Donors' Community for Enterprise Development (DCED)
standard. Similarly, Communication and Knowledge Management Strategies for HVAP have been
drafted in line with the intervention strategies in the Value Chains. Seven district orientations on
x Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
the project including commodity/area mapping of potential value chains were conducted based on
the road corridors and geographic targeting strategy of the project. Trainings on knowledge
management to PMU staff and stakeholders conducted. Suggestions and directions from the
Project Steering Committee (PSC) and Project Consultative and Coordination Group (PCCG) have
been received through their meetings. Various publications like brochures, leaf-lets, calendar etc.
were produced for sharing project's information to a wider range. The project started the radio
program “High Value Agriculture Program” through Radio Nepal and Bheri FM to share information
about the project and improved technologies with a wider audience. The project also updated its
website – www.hvap.gov.np regularly to disseminate its information.
During the reporting period, the project could achieve 52.58 % of weighted progress against the
target. The project has spent NRs. 86.31 million (43.85%) against the target of NRs. 196.83 million
during the same period. The cumulative expenditure, of the last two fiscal years, was NRs. 114.36
million (47.42%) against the target for the same fiscal years. The project could receive three
withdrawals with amount of SDR 10,14,069.94 from IFAD, during the reporting period, accounting
disbursement as 10.67 % of the total IFAD allocation.
During this period, as per the recommendation from the second supervision mission and the
decision of the PSC, the project has modified its implementation arrangement as (i) there will not
be national NGO as service provider, instead technical backstopping to the local NGOs will be
provided by the extended technical team of PMU, and (ii) investment modalities of the project
funds- value chain fund and production & post harvest support fund have also been modified. As
such, the project had to revise the related activities accordingly. Further, the field activities were
delayed due to delay in local NGO contract which was because of long and complex selection
procedures. Similarly, long administrative process had to be adopted for guidelines preparation
and approval, which eventually caused in delay implementation.
Despite of these problems and challenges before the project, it has been able to prepare the
ground on which future project activities will be implemented smoothly. Further, coordination and
supports from project stakeholders; and regular monitoring and implementation support from
MoAD and IFAD have directed the PMU to implement the project more effectively in the days to
come.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 1
A. INTRODUCTION
The High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) is a market led initiative that
seeks to provide income and employment benefit to poor small holder farmers, landless and
agribusiness through development and upgrading of pro-poor value chains in the Mid and Far
Western Region of the country. Following the Inclusive Business (IB) approach, the project focuses
on facilitating mutually beneficial and profitable arrangements between the suppliers (Producers)
and buyers (Traders) of high value commodity (HVC) value chains and inclusion of excluded groups.
Based on the newly constructed three road corridors (Chhinchu-Jajarkot, Surkhet-Dailekh and
Surkhet-Jumla), the project has been implemented in Dailekh, Jajarkot, Jumla, Kalikot, Salyan,
Surkhet, and Achham districts; and will expand to Dolpa, Humla, and Mugu as the road extends
thereby serving 10 districts of the Mid and Far Western Development Region.
Project Objectives
The overall goal of the project is the reduction of poverty and vulnerability of women and men in
hill and mountain areas of the Mid and Far Western Development Region and the project purpose
is to integrate rural poor, especially women and marginal groups, in high value agriculture products
and NTFP/MAPs value chains and markets and improved income, employment opportunities, and
ability to respond to market demand and opportunities based on marketing agreements with
private agribusinesses.
Expected project outcomes are:
Improved commercial relations and partnerships between agricultural/NTFP/MAP market
operators and producers result in profitable, efficient, market-orientated production of high
value commodities for 13 500 beneficiary households.
Increased participation and access of poor marginal producers in high value commodity value
chains and agricultural/NTFP markets.
Small poor farmers and other rural producers benefit from sustainable increases in volume
and value of production as a result of improved production/collection, value addition and
sales of high value niche market products.
Enhanced environment and strengthened local capacity to support market driven/value chain
initiatives.
Target Beneficiaries
The Project aims to benefit about 1800 traders and 13500 producer households directly and 37000
households indirectly, living in the Project Area. The target groups among the producers consist of
the members of poor and vulnerable households who lack access to resources and opportunities.
As such, the project has target to benefit 60% women and 25% socially disadvantaged groups such
as Dalits and indigenous group (Janajatis) who are most vulnerable groups in the project area.
2
Projec
The proj
Dailekh
corridors
covers t
network
Projec
There ar
2) Inclus
shows th
ct Areas:
ect covers th
(68 km) an
s are Achham
hree remote
expands. Th
ct Compo
re three mut
ion and Sup
he interrelati
Component
A
hree north-s
d Surkhet-J
m, Dailekh,
e and high
he figure no.1
Fi
onents
tually reinfor
pport for Val
ionship of th
2:
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
south road co
umla road
Jajarkot, Jum
hill/mounta
1 describes t
gure 1: Projec
rcing compo
lue Chain In
e project co
Figure 2:
gress Report
gress Report
orridors: Sur
(232 km). T
mla, Kalikot,
inous distric
the project a
ct Areas (Corri
onents; name
itiatives; and
mponents.
Project Comp
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
rkhet-Chhinc
he initial se
, Salyan and
cts Dolpa, M
area and road
idors and Distr
ely 1) Pro-Po
d 3) Project
ponents
Comp
VAP
chu-Jajarkot
even districts
d Surkhet. Fu
Mugu and H
d corridors.
ricts)
oor Value Ch
Managemen
ponent 1
Compo
(132 km), Su
s served by
urther, the p
Humla as th
hain Develop
nt. The figur
:
onent 3:
urkhet-
y these
project
e road
pment;
re no.2
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 3
Expected Impact
The project aims to achieve the following impact on the beneficiaries at the end of the project;
Improved households assets ownership index;
Reduced child malnutrition;
Improved primary education and literacy rate;
Increased food security period; and
Increased participation of women, Dalits, Janajatis and other minorities.
Project Approach
The project adopts an Inclusive Business approach for Value Chain Development (Component 1) –
with the other components directly supporting upgrading and inclusion through capacity building
and establishment of funds (Component 2) and arrangements for project management
(Component 3). The project adheres to the following guiding principles:
Demand driven value chain development: agribusiness with proven demand as the point of
departure; inclusion of producers in the supply chain.
Producer-agribusiness partnership in value chain development and enhanced bargaining power
of producers.
Collective marketing by producers: group / cooperative agreements with agribusiness.
Inclusion of women, poor and vulnerable groups like Dalits and Janajatis in value chain groups.
Sustainability of institutions (value chain groups and cooperatives) and processes (value chains
that are profitable to both the agribusinesses/traders and the producers).
Facilitate spatial as well as social inclusion and promote equity in project support among the
ten participating districts.
Partnership in implementation: implement the project primarily through local NGOs and local
service providers with government/MoAD having overall responsibility and oversight and SNV
taking the lead technically in guiding project implementation.
Facilitate value chain group financing through a combination of sources: Agribusiness financing
linked to agreed contracts, self-generated savings from group savings and credit schemes,
loans from local Micro Finance Institutions, a project value chain fund for
infrastructure/equipment investment, and a project production inputs fund to establish group
revolving funds.
Implementing Arrangement
The Ministry of Agricultural Development (MoAD) has the overall responsibilities for the project
implementation. It has been great advantage to the project for the coordination and collaboration
for the effective implementation as the Project Management Unit (PMU) is based in Surkhet.
Within the PMU, the SNV team is responsible for the pro-poor value chain development and the
4
activities
and is ba
the comp
project s
close coo
framewo
Working
Group (P
arrangem
B. PUR
The purp
T
b
T
R
Co
Val
ChaAnaly
s in inclusion
ased in the p
ponent one
services wou
ordination w
ork comprise
Group, both
PCCG) based
ment and ste
RPOSE OF
pose of the re
To inform
beneficiaries
To documen
Central
Regiona
District
ommuni
ue
ain ysis
A
n and suppor
project office
with the SNV
uld be delive
with DADO/D
es three ma
h Kathmand
in Surkhet.
eps of progra
Figure 4
F THE RE
eport is:
the donor,
s about the p
t the status o
Level
l Level
Level
ity Leve
Value ChaInterventi
Plan
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
rt for value
e. Similarly, A
V team in cl
red by distri
DLSO/DFOs o
in bodies:
u-based, and
The figure n
amme implem
Figure 3: Imp
4: Programme
EPORT
project pa
progress of th
of the projec
•Minist
•Projec
•Partne
•Projec
•Region
•HVAP D
•District
•District
•Local N
•Public A
•Group
•Coope
•Agribul
ain on
gress Report
gress Report
chain initiati
AEC officials
ose coordina
ict based loc
f concerned
Project Stee
d an area-ba
o. 4 and 5 re
mentation re
lementation A
Implementatio
artners, sta
he project; a
ct for future
try of Agricult
ct Steering Co
ers (SNV-Nep
ct Coordinati
nal Directror
District Worki
t Line Agencie
t Chamber of
NGO
Audit Group
ps
eratives
usiness
Sub-Projects Selection
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
ives, which i
are also resp
ation with ot
cal NGOs, ba
project distr
ering Commi
ased Project
epresents th
espectively.
Arrangement
on Procedures
akeholders p
and
use.
tural Develop
ommittee
pal and AEC)
on and Cons
ates of Agric
ng Group (DA
es (Agriculture
Commerce an
Implati
SPro
VAP
is the integra
ponsible for
ther project
ackstopped b
rict. The pro
ttee (PSC),
Consultative
he institution
s/Steps
project staf
pment
sultation Gro
culture, Lives
ADC)
e, Livestock an
nd Industry (D
lementon of
Sub-ojects
al part of th
implementa
team. Most
by the PMU
ject’s collabo
HVAP Agribu
e and Coord
nal implemen
ff and con
oup (PCCG)
stock and Fo
nd Forest)
DCCI)
Monitor& Evalua
e PMU
ation of
t of the
and in
orative
usiness
ination
ntation
cerned
rest
ring ation
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 5
C. RESULTS OF THE PROJECT
C1. OUTCOMES
Pro-Poor Value Chain Development
The project has carried out value chain analysis of the seven commodities (apple, vegetable seeds,
off-season vegetables, ginger, turmeric, goat meat, and timur (Xantho/toothache tree) so far as
against the 18 value chain commodities as per project document, during the project period.
However, the project has initially prioritized about 12 value chain commodities. The remaining
value chains studies of potential commodities will be carried out in third year (FY 2012/13). The
status of the value chain study is given in Annex 1.
The seven value chains will be implemented in the third year of the project implementation. The
project developed value chain implementation plan of the three value chains; apple, ginger, and
vegetable seeds. The implementation plan of four value chains will be developed in the third year
of the project. The project has planned to study the value chains of orange, Sugandhawal and
Jatamasi etc. in the third year. The project will further identify and explore some new potential
commodities for intervention side by side.
Twenty one agribusinesses showed the interest to work with the project and seven agribusinesses
out of them were requested to prepare business plans and they have submitted their business
plans to PMU in three value chains (apple, ginger and vegetable seeds) following project guidelines.
The project has facilitated the contract (Carrot: 2200 kg, radish: 1000 kg, broad mustard leaf: 500
kg, coriander 1000 kg, and swisschard: 500 kg) between seed producing groups and SEAN Seed
Service Centre in Jumla. The project consulted and facilitated with B.H. Enterprise to link with apple
producers in Jumla, though formal contracts could not be made.
Inclusion and Support for Value Chain Initiatives
The project has developed fund guidelines viz. value chain fund guidelines, and production and
post harvest support fund guidelines, based on which project investments would be made in
production, post harvest and market related activities for the sustainable pro-poor value chain
development thereby meeting the project objectives. Likewise the project has developed gender
and social inclusion strategy and action plans based on which project activities will be implemented
assuring the inclusion of women, Dalits & Janajatis and distribute the benefits of the project to
these groups equitably.
Under the production and post harvest support, altogether 14 groups and cooperatives were
supported for fresh vegetables production and apple orchard management in three districts
namely Surkhet, Dailekh and Jumla. The project has target to support at least 500 groups and
cooperatives as value chain groups during the project period. So far, the support from the project
has covered 1,451 households through providing production inputs and technical services. Among
the benefited households, Dalits, Janajatis and other caste households were 9 percent, 13 percent
6
and 78 p
22 perce
25%. Thu
and men
Chart 2: P
The pro
managem
trainings
going to
the proje
target of
Chart 4: T
Project
The proj
project a
its objec
and Man
Inclusive
Dist
Fa
Fem
percent resp
ent which is a
us, project n
n members o
Project benefit
oject condu
ment and v
s was 53% as
women. Stil
ect. Likewise
f 25%, has als
Training partic
t Managem
ect has deve
activities smo
tive. The pro
nagement (
e Business (V
78%
tribution of Ben
Cat
47%
Distribution
rmers' Level
male Participa
A
ectively. Alto
a good sign o
needs to incr
of groups and
ed Households
cted skill o
vegetable an
s against the
l the project
e, the particip
so showed a
cipants by gen
ment Inclu
eloped huma
oothly. It hel
oject has for
PCM), (ii) P
VC-IB), (iv) P
9%
nefited HHs by
tegory
Dalits HHs
of Participa
l Training by
ants Male P
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
ogether, the
of inclusion o
rease these
d cooperative
s by social cate
oriented pra
nd turmeric
target of 60
t has to incre
pation of Da
a good sign.
der
uding M&E
an resource
ps the proje
rmed five the
Planning and
roduction &
13%
Social
53%
ants in
y Gender
Participants
gress Report
gress Report
e benefited h
of Dalits and
figure in com
es were 53%
egory C
actical train
c production
0%. This is als
ease the perc
lits and Jana
Chart 5
E and Kno
managemen
ect managem
ematic grou
d Monitorin
Post Harves
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
households f
d Janajatis, in
ming year. L
% and 47% re
Chart 3: Proje
ning to the
n. The parti
so a good sig
centage of w
ajatis in the t
5: Training pa
owledge M
nt plan in dif
ment to guide
ps at PMU le
g & Evaluat
st Support an
4
Distribut
Groups a
78%
Distribut
Farmers' L
Dali
Jana
VAP
from Dalits a
nitiated as ag
Likewise, the
espectively.
ect benefited by
e farmers o
icipation of
gn that the p
women up to
training was
articipants by s
Managemen
fferent levels
e the project
evel as (i) Pr
tion (PME),
nd Funds & C
47%
ion of Benefite
and Cooperativ
13%
ion of Partic
evel Training
Category
ts Participants
ajatis Participan
and Janajati
gainst the ta
e benefited w
y Gender
on apple o
women in
project benef
o 60% by the
22% as agai
social category
nt
s to impleme
t towards ach
roject Coord
(iii) Value
Contracts (P
53%
ed Members in
ves by Gender
Wom
9%
cipants in
g by Social
nts
is were
rget of
women
orchard
these
fits are
end of
nst the
y
ent the
hieving
ination
Chain-
PS-FC),
men
and (v) G
one foca
(Local NG
leader fa
business
5, and de
The proj
compreh
and cov
geograph
the three
system w
its datab
The pro
www.hva
audience
program
The prog
developm
reports,
the proje
project a
Gender, Soci
al person as
GO) will be a
armers are/
services to t
etail list of th
ject has dev
hensive and
vered dece
hical informa
e tools; Res
will track the
base system.
ject has dev
ap.gov.np, t
e. Likewise,
“High Value
gramme info
ment which
and manuals
ect has prod
and share inf
ial Inclusion
ssigned from
at the distric
/will be man
the produce
he staff is giv
Fig
veloped a co
relevant dat
ntralized d
ation manag
ult and Impa
e individual f
The highligh
veloped onli
the project
the project
e Agriculture
orms about t
the project i
s to inform a
duced merch
formation ab
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
and Capacit
m each line
ct levels. Soc
naged at co
rs and trade
ven in Annex
gure 5: Human
omprehensiv
ta and infor
ata collecti
gement syste
act Monitor
farmers’ pro
ht of the M&
ne tools to
progress a
t related no
e Programme
the project a
is working o
and share ab
handises like
bout the proj
gress Report
gress Report
ty Developm
agencies/DC
cial Mobilize
ommunity le
ers at local le
2.
n Resource Ma
ve monitorin
mation to th
on system,
em and kno
ing System,
oduction, con
E System is p
share its inf
and activitie
otices are b
e” in Nepali i
activities, tec
n. The proje
bout the proj
e t-shirts, cap
ject.
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
ment (GSI-CD
CCIs and Dis
rs (Local NG
evels to pro
evel. The det
anagement Plan
ng and eval
he project. T
, managem
wledge man
Result Chain
nsumption, s
presented in
formation a
s are being
being shared
is aired throu
chnical advic
ct has also p
ect activities
ps, calendar
VAP
). Likewise t
strict Progra
O), local res
vide the te
ail of the pla
n
uation syste
This system
ent of inf
nagement sy
ns and Proje
sales and inc
n Annex 3.
nd results. T
g dissemina
d through w
ugh Radio N
ces and rega
published the
s and progre
s and broch
the project h
amme Coord
source perso
chnical as w
an is given in
em to provi
is an open s
formation s
ystem. It inte
ect Log fram
come data th
Through we
ted to the
website. The
epal and Bhe
arding value
e periodic pr
ss status. Lik
ures to prof
7
has got
dinator
ons and
well as
n figure
de the
system
system,
egrates
me. The
hrough
b page
wider
e radio
eri FM.
chains
rogress
kewise,
file the
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
8 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
C2. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE YEAR 2011/12
The project has completed its second year after its commencement from July 2010. During the
reporting year (2011/12) the project spent the time on preparation of value chain fund guidelines,
production and post harvest support fund guidelines, GSI strategy and action plan, intervention
strategy of three value chains (apple, ginger and vegetable seeds), study of four value chains
(timur, goat, turmeric, and off-season vegetables), M&E system, communication and knowledge
management strategy, NGO mobilization guideline, institutional capacity development assessment
plan and drafted the spatial inclusion fund guidelines etc. The outputs of the project achieved
during the reporting period (16 July 2011 to 15 July 2012) have been explained component wise
below:
1 PRO-POOR VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT
SNV PART
Output 1.1: ToRs Developed for Baselines Study:
The ToRs have been developed to carry out the combined baseline (RIMS, Project and Value Chain)
survey of three value chains namely ginger, apple and vegetable seeds. The cluster and respondent
will be selected by systematic random sampling technique for the study. The study carries out
respondent stratification exercise for each pocket/cluster prior to the interviews, preferably using
participatory tools like socio-economic well-being. Based on the stratification exercise, sample
consists of respondents representing at least three economic strata (ultra-poor, moderately poor,
near poor and relatively well off). Thus a total of 120 respondents from four clusters or pockets per
Value Chain and 30 respondents per cluster will be interviewed for each value chain there by
making sample size of 360. The concept of combine baseline survey has been developed during the
second joint implementation support mission. The baseline study will be carried out and reported
within December 2012.
Output 1.2: Six Stakeholder consultation, validation and strategy develop-
ment workshop carried out:
Stakeholder consultation and validation workshops were conducted at district, regional and
national level to validate information generated through the six value chain studies, to incorporate
perspectives of various stakeholders and seeking further suggestions and feedbacks including the
possible interventions on specific value chains under the study. The district level workshops were
conducted in Surkhet, Jajarkot and Dailekh districts. This was followed by a regional level
workshop. Finally, a national level validation workshop was organized in Kathmandu focusing on
policy gaps, enabling environment, and business opportunities and constraints at sub-national,
national, and international level. The workshops were organized in participatory way involving
concerned stakeholders representing input suppliers, producers, processors, traders, besides
government and non-government organization representatives as DFO, DADO, DLSO, Plant &
Animal Quarantines, Customs Office, financial institutions, DCCIs and development projects. There
were altogether 300 participants including 21 female and 77 Dalits/Janajatis in six value chain
stakeholder consultation and validation workshops as shown in table 2.
Table 1:
S.
N.
Tit
1 Dis
Sta
Co
Wo
2 Dis
Sta
Co
Wo
3 Dis
Sta
Co
Wo
4 Dis
Sta
co
Wo
5 Re
an
Str
De
Wo
6 Na
Wo
S
Number of
tle of worksh
strict level
akeholders’
onsultation
orkshop
strict level
akeholders’
onsultation
orkshop
strict level
akeholders’
onsultation
orkshop
strict level
akeholders
nsultation
orkshop
gional Valida
d Interventio
rategy
evelopment
orkshop
ational Valida
orkshop
T
Stakeholders
f Participant
hop Date
21 D
201
23 D
201
27 D
201
26 D
201
ation
on
15-1
Feb
201
ation 6 Ap
201
otal
s’ Participati
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
ts in Value C
e Valu
Dec,
1
Timu
Dec,
1
Off S
Vege
(OSV
Dec,
1
Goat
Dec,
1
Turm
16
,
2
Timu
Goat
& Tu
pril,
2
Timu
Goat
& Tu
on on Value
gress Report
gress Report
Chain Stake
e chain Pla
ur Jaj
Season
etable
V)
Su
t Da
meric Su
ur, OSV,
t meat
urmeric
Ne
ur, OSV,
t meat
urmeric
Kat
u
Chain Consu
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
eholders Con
ace
T
jarkot
rkhet
ailekh
rkhet
epalgunj
hmand
3
ultation and
VAP
nsultation W
No. of Partic
otal Male
30 28
31 30
31 30
42 39
93 87
73 65
300 279
Validation W
Workshops
cipants Da
JaFemale
2
1
1
3
6
8
21
Workshop
9
alits/
najatis
9
5
1
7
29
26
77
10
Chart 6: S
The abov
whereas
project h
women a
The wor
Chain co
worksho
Output
The busi
worksho
districts
shared d
create a
represen
during t
interactio
guideline
Table 2:
S.
N
1 B
S
2 CG
3 Him
Pvt
Dis
Stakeholders’ w
ve pie chart
poor partic
has to increa
and keeping
kshops also
onstraints an
p were incor
t 1.3: Thre
ness plans s
ps. Agribusi
for respectiv
draft busines
a common
ntatives of o
the worksho
ons. The bu
es. The detai
No. of part
Name of A
B H Enterpris
SEAN Seed S
G Seeds and F
malayan Nat
t Ltd
93%
tribution of Par
Work
A
workshops par
s 6 and 7 in
cipation of w
ase the fema
continue thi
provided op
d to leverag
rporated in t
ee Agribus
hared with t
ness-produc
ve value chai
ss plans amo
understand
other organiz
ops. Total
usiness plan
l of the agrib
ticipants in A
Agribusiness
se Pvt Ltd
Service Centr
Fertilizer Pvt
ural Industr
Tot
7%
Female Pa
Male Parti
rticipants in the
kshops by Gend
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
rticipants by g
ndicate mode
women (7%)
ale participat
is track reco
pportunities
ge the availa
the final stud
siness Eng
the produce
cers interact
in as present
ong the prod
ing and ta
zations /proj
of 141 par
ns are unde
businesses h
Agribusines
s Va
ch
re Ltd
App
Veg
Ltd Veg
ries Ging
tal
rticipants
cipants
e Stakeholders
der
gress Report
gress Report
ender Chart
erately bette
) compared
tion to meet
rd of Dalits a
to design in
ble opportu
dy report.
gagement
r representa
ion worksho
ted in table 2
ducers and c
ke necessar
jects workin
rticipants in
er evaluatio
as been pres
ss-producers
alue
hain
Ve
le
seed
Khal
Jum
seed Mel
Surk
ger Salli
Saly
s
S
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
7: Participant
er participat
to the proj
t the project
and Janajatis
tervention s
nities. The c
Workshop
atives in agri
ops were or
2. During the
cooperatives
ry actions
ng in similar
ncluding 13
on following
sented in tab
s interaction
enue
Ma
langa,
la
41
kuna,
khet
41
bazar,
an
46
12
74%
Dalits
Othe
Distributio
Stakeholders W
VAP
ts by social cat
tion from Da
ect target (
t target of 60
s participants
strategies to
comments an
ps Carried
business-pro
ganized to s
e workshop,
s for feedba
for contract
value chain
women pa
the value
ble 2.
n programm
No of Pa
le Female
1 3
1 7
6 3
8 13
s & Janajatis P
r Caste Partic
on of Participan
Workshops by So
tegory
alit/Janajatis
60%) in tota
0% participa
s.
address the
nd feedback
d Out:
oducers inte
share in pro
the agribusi
acks/suggesti
t facilitation
n were also
articipated
chain fund
me
articipants
e Dalits/Ja
3
9
14
26
26%
Participation
ipation
ts in the
ocial Category
s (26%)
al. The
tion of
e Value
of the
raction
omising
inesses
ions to
n. The
invited
in the
(VCF)
najatis
Chart 8: I
The abov
producer
participa
Janajatis
Output
HVAP ha
approach
on inclus
of intere
as the e
the ab
chain int
the proje
interest
agribusin
and re
Butwal)
out of 21
timur, o
arrangem
further
agribusin
Fe
Di
Pro
Interaction wor
ve charts 8 a
rs is few in
ate in worksh
s was 18% in
t 1.4: Seve
as adopted
h with a sp
sive busines
sted agribus
ntry point fo
bove-mentio
terventions j
ect invited e
(EoI) from
nesses in na
egional (Ne
daily on 1st
1 applicants
off-season ve
ments with p
consulted a
ness has bee
91%
Cha
emale Particip
istribution of Pa
oducers Interac
rkshops partic
and 9 show
n total. The
hops and se
total.
en Agribus
a value ch
pecific focus
ss. Selection
siness serves
or executing
ned value
ointly. Thus,
xpression of
m potential
ational daily
epalgunj a
December 2
following st
egetable, tu
producer gro
and support
n presented
9%
art Title
pants Male
articipants in A
ction Worksho
Category
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
Bo
Comp
least
Exist
Qual
opera
Inclu
Capa
partn
cipants by gend
that the par
e project ha
minars to ra
sinesses S
ain
s
s
g
e
,
f
y
and
2011. The pr
tandard crite
urmeric and
oups/cooper
ted for bus
on Table 3.
e
e Participants
grbusiness &
ps by Gender
gress Report
gress Report
ox 1: AGRIBU
pany having
three years’
ting supply ch
ity of plan: p
ation modalit
usiveness: po
acity and willi
nership.
der Chart 9
rticipation of
as to focus
aise their vo
Submitted
oject short-l
eria (Box 1) t
goat meat
ratives. The
siness plan
Di
Prod
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
USINESS SHO
in similar bu
’ with registra
hain network
purchase volu
ty
otential impac
ngness to ex
9: Interaction wo
f the women
to encoura
ices. The pa
Business
listed 12 pot
to work on a
value chai
following sh
developmen
82%
Da
stribution of
ucers Interact
VAP
ORT LISTING
siness /comm
ation
for selected
ume, working
ct on poor an
xpand busine
orkshops partici
n (9%) and D
age and em
rticipation fr
Plans
tential agrib
apple, ginge
ns, for sust
hort-listed ag
nt. The list
18%
alits & Janajatis
Participants in
tion Workshop
G CRITERIA
modity for at
value chains
area and
nd small farm
ss in benefici
ipants by social
Dalit/Janajat
mpower wom
rom the Dal
usiness com
r, vegetable
tainable ma
gribusinesse
of the po
%
s Participation
n Agrbusiness
ps by Social Cat
11
s
mers
ial
category
i (18%)
men to
lits and
mpanies
seeds,
rketing
s were
otential
s &
tegory
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
12 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Table 3: List of Potential Agribusinesses by value chains
S.N. Value Chain Name of Potential Agribusiness
1 Apple B H Enterprise Pvt Ltd, Kathmandu
Organic World and Fair Future, Kathmandu
2 Vegetable Seed SEAN Seed Service Centre Ltd, Kathmandu
CG Seeds and Fertilizer Pvt Ltd, Kathmandu
3 Ginger
Dabur Nepal Pvt Ltd, Kathmandu
Gyan Herbal Products Pvt Ltd, Nepalgunj
Himalayan Naturals Pvt Ltd, Kathmandu
The Organic Village, Kathmandu
Organic World and Fair Future
4 Timur
Dabur Nepal Pvt Ltd
Gyan Herbal Products Pvt Ltd
Natural Resources Industries Pvt Ltd
5 Turmeric Gyan Herbal Products Pvt Ltd
Organic World and Fair Future
6 Off Season Vegetable K P Business Service Pvt Ltd
Babu & Shahi Vegetable and Fruit wholesale Shop
7 Goat Meat Fresh Hygienic Food
So far, seven companies interested in apple, ginger and vegetable seeds have developed and
submitted their business plans to HVAP. The business plans will be evaluated by Business Plan
Assessment Panel (BPAP) later.
The project contracted Surya Social Society Service (4S) for continuation of technical backstopping
to the groups and cooperatives in Jumla. The 4S was engaged in the High Value Agriculture –
Inclusive Business Pilot Project (HVA-IB) as local NGO. This programme was funded by IFAD and
implemented by SNV-Nepal. The 4S worked with HVAP for 3 months in last year. The 4S provided
trainings and technical support to the groups and cooperatives. The 4S facilitated groups and
cooperatives for contract between groups and SEAN Seed Service Centre for vegetable seeds
production.
Output 1.5: Six Value Chains Studied1:
The project conducted value chain analysis (VCA) of four commodities: timur, goat meat, turmeric
& off-season fresh vegetables (tomato, bean/pea pod, and cauliflower/ cabbage). Initially it was
planned to analyze the seven value chains, but it was decided to focus activities on these six value
chains (collectively 4). The studies of three value chains (apple, ginger and vegetable seeds) were
already completed by SNV-Nepal from its own resource with close coordination of Department of
Agriculture of Nepal, whereas, validation workshops for ginger and vegetable seeds value chains
1 Collectively there were 4 value chain studies – timur, turmeric, goat meat and off-season vegetable. The off-
season vegetable comprised of tomato, cauliflower/cabbage and bean/pea pod making 3 individual value chains within it.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 13
were conducted from HVAP resource. The results of the VCA laid the foundation for project
implementation in the following year. The six VC studies were carried out by Asia Network for
Sustainable Agriculture and Bio-resources (ANSAB), selected on quality based competitive bidding
including interviews. ANSAB worked closely with the project team during the value chain study
including the field visits.
The project has mandate of studying 18 value chains as per project document. The project
organized agribusiness opportunity workshops in Nepalgunj and Kathmandu in July 2011. The
agribusiness opportunity workshops suggested studying 12 value chains as per interest of the
agribusinesses. The detail of the value chains by category has been shown in table 4. Now, the
project has nine value chain study reports. The result chains and intervention strategies were
prepared for three value chains. The details of result chains and intervention strategies are
presented in Annex 4.
Table 4: List of the Selected Value Chains by Agribusiness Opportunity Workshops
S.N. Category No. of Value
Chains
Name of Value Chains
1 Fruits 2 Apple and Orange
2 Livestock 1 Goat Meat
3 NTFPs/MAPs 3 Timur, Essential Oils(Sugandhwal/Jatimansi
4 Spices 2 Ginger and Turmeric
5 Vegetables 4 Vegetable Seeds, Off-season Fresh
Vegetables [(i) Tomato, (ii)
Cauliflower/Cabbage, (iii) Bean/Pea pod]
Output 1.6: B2B Linkage Facilitation:
The project supported participation of seven representatives of DCCI members, traders and
cooperatives from project districts in three trade fairs and exhibitions with the aim of
strengthening institutional capacity of DCCIs to facilitate trade of high value commodities, explore
linkages with potential agribusinesses and to link up with and identify possible areas of
collaboration with various stakeholders in the respective districts, which are listed as follows:
5th National Agro Trade Fair organized by FNCCI/AEC from 9-11 March 2011 in Kathmandu
with the theme “Commercialization of Agriculture for Food Security and Income Generation”
National Exhibition on herbs, species and essential oil organized by Jadibuti Association of
Nepal (JABAN) from 11-13 January 2012 with the theme “Enhancing Nepal's Economy
through Herbs Promotion Globally” in Nepalgunj
Trade Fair organised by Banke Chambers of Commerce and Industry (CCI) from 10-21,
February 2012 in Nepalgunj
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
14 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
During the trade fairs, the project displayed and distributed various materials related to the project
and prioritized value chains. In addition, DCCI members / traders and farmers from Jumla, Salyan,
Dailekh, Kalikot and Surkhet districts actively participated and exhibited the high value agricultural
products like organic apples and apple products, vegetable seeds, ginger and NTFPs / MAPs such as
chiuri, sugandhwal, and timur.
Output 1.7: Three Value Chain Intervention Strategies Developed
The project has developed apple, ginger and vegetable seeds value chains intervention strategies
that provide a framework and plan for implementation and investment funds under Component 2.
The result chains and intervention strategies of above mentioned three-value chains are attached
in annex 2. The intervention strategies were shared during the District Agriculture Development
Committee (DADC) meeting in seven districts for endorsement and to create ownership.
AEC PART
Output 1.8: Seven Contracts Signed between DCCIs and AEC:
Agreements were signed between AEC and each individual CCIs of seven districts namely Achham,
Dailekh, Jajarkot, Jumla, Kalikot, Salyan and Surkhet to carry out the project activities like market
price dissemination, inclusive business, business development services etc. The contract elaborates
the roles and responsibilities of CCIs and AEC would provide support to them within the project
limitations.
Output 1.9: Five Staff Trained for Data and Information Collection in DCCIs
Five DCCIs (Salyan, Surkhet, Dailekh, Kalikot and Jumla) were visited separately and provided one
day training to their staff. Market Information System (MIS) Associate of AEC provided the training
to the data collectors on price information collection of high value agricultural commodities of
respective districts. Altogether five participants participated in the trainings. The role of data
collectors is to collect price information of agriculture related produces at local level covering
major market hubs. After collection, it is submitted to AEC Central Unit. The central unit compiles
the market price information and forwards to DCCIs for display in the market hubs.
Output 1.10: Market Information Collected and Disseminated through Website
The project has established AEC satellite unit in five DCCIs (Salyan, Surkhet, Dailekh, Kalikot, and
Jumla) in the last fiscal year. They have appointed focal persons who collect and compile market
price information in the respective districts. The information is sent to AEC which is processed and
published in the AEC website (www.agripricenepal.com).
Output 1.11: HVAP Agribusiness Working Group Formed at Central Level:
HVAP agribusiness working group has been formed at central level with the chairmanship of FNCCI
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 15
president to coordinate the agribusinesses, raise policy issues and provide suggestions and
recommendations for sustainable development of value chains. It would also provide an
opportunity for project management to seek advice with the group as a whole or with individual
members on issues of concern including policy advocacy. There are 12 members in this group.
There were two meetings organized at FNCCI during the reporting period, where the ToRs of the
group discussed, endorsed, and finalized the roles and responsibilities of the members.
Output 1.12: Self Institutional Capacity Assessment of five DCCIs facilitated:
Self-institutional capacity assessment and capacity strengthening plan of DCCIs was carried out in
five districts namely Surkhet, Salyan, Achham, Dailekh and Jumla. The project facilitated the self
capacity assessment by using a toolkit with nine indicators and five sub-indicators using four
parameters each in the form of an inquiry. Depending upon the answer of the member of DCCI to
standard questions posed by the facilitator under each item and category indicative score is given.
The total points accumulated by the DCCIs determine the overall impression on the capacity of the
DCCIs. The capacity strengthening plan is purposed to develop in the area/point where the
assessment score is low or moderately low.
The assessment, in figure 6 showed that the Achham and Salyan DCCIs are poor among the
assessed DCCIs on all indicators. And all the DCCIs got fewer points under gender and social
inclusion; coordination with stakeholders; and programme and planning indicators. So, they have
realized to build capacities on these aspects. The present status of the DCCIs institutional Capacity
has been shown in figure 6.
Figure 6: Spider web diagram of DCCIs Self- Assessment
02468
101214161820
Internal Organisation
Motivation among board
members and staff
Programme and planning
Knowledge management
and quality of services
Management of market
information system
Financial resources and
management
Relationship with
stakeholders
Gender and Social
Inclusion
Advocacy
Achieved Achham
Achieved Dailekh
Achieved Jumla
Achieved Salyan
Achieved Surkhet
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
16 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Output 1.13: Documentation
The value chain study reports, training reports, workshop reports, media trip report, progress
reports have been documented at HVAP Information Centre and disseminated to the project
stakeholders. The documents have been uploaded in web page to increase the access of the
development actors as well as researchers.
2 INCLUSION AND SUPPORT FOR VALUE CHAIN INITIATIVES
The objective of the component is to benefit small poor farmers and other rural producers from
sustainable increases in volume and value of production as a result of improved
production/collection, value addition and sales of high value niche market products and
strengthened local capacity for market driven initiatives. The five sub-components have been
designed not only to link with the value chain development process of Component 1 but to be
mutually supporting. Each is necessary to ensure that the value chains are successfully
implemented in an equitable and sustainable manner.
2.1: Group Formation and Strengthening
Once the value chain development plans have been agreed upon the Expression of Interests (EOIs)
will be called from producer groups and cooperatives, agro-vets, traders and agribusiness houses
working in each value chain. The EOIs selection committee will shortlist and request them to
submit full business plans. The project will then support and strengthen the selected producer
groups/cooperatives and traders by providing them technical as well as business services. The
project aims to cover a minimum of 750 households per value chain with 25% Dalits and Janajatis
households.
Output 2.1.1: Contract of National NGO Suspended
The IFAD second supervision and implementation support mission (16 May to 2 June 2012)
recommended the suspension of the National NGO recruitment process. This has also been
endorsed by PSC. Though, full proposals from shortlisted six NGOs out of 29 submitted expression
of interests, were in the process of technical evaluation. The mission has also recommended the
project to extend the technical team in leadership of High Value Production Specialist for technical
backstopping to the local NGOs to be recruited in the project.
Output 2.1.2: Contract of Local NGO for Field Activities
The selection process of the local NGO is still undergoing. Technical proposals from 42 shortlisted
local NGOs had been evaluated by the evaluation team at Project Management Unit (PMU) and
sent the technical evaluation sheets to the IFAD for approval. After getting IFAD’s approval, the
financial evaluation will be carried out and the local NGOs will be selected and their services will be
procured. The selection process is expected to be completed within September 2012.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 17
Output 2.1.3: Eight Groups Identified and Strengthened
As per the direction of PSC, the project has made an action plan for field interventions. Altogether
eight groups were identified three from Surkhet, three from Dailekh and two groups from Jumla to
support production and post harvest facilities this year. These groups were provided technical
services and production inputs like plastic sheets for off season tomato, seeds of off-season
vegetables, pesticides, sprayers etc. The detail of the groups has been given in table 5.
Table 5: Name and Address of Groups
1 Radhakrishna Off-season Vegetable Farming Group Jarbuta-1, Surkhet
2 Srijana Vegatable Production Group Kunathari-8 Damar, Surkhet
3 Janaklyan Agriculture Group Kunathari-8 Damar, Surkhet
4
Ji l lane Potato Seeds and Off-Season Vegetable Production
Farmers' GroupGoganpani-8, Dailekh
5 Lagansheel Commercial Seeds Production Farmers' Group Baraha-5, Dailekh
6 Lagansheel Commercial Seeds Production Farmers' Group Dandaparajuli-9, Dailekh
7 Malabhid Women Fruit and Vegetable Farmers' Group Jumla
8 Golden Group Kartikswami-9, Jumla
AddressName of GroupS.N.
Output 2.1.4: Six Cooperatives Identified and Strengthened
All together six cooperatives were identified - four from Surkhet, one from Dailekh and one from
Jumla to support production and post harvest facilities in this fiscal year. These cooperatives were
also supported with technical services and agricultural inputs like plastic sheet for off season
tomato, seeds of off-season vegetables, pesticides, sprayers etc. The detail of the cooperatives has
been shown in table 6.
Table 6: Name and Address of the Cooperatives
1 Nari Ekata Women Agriculture Cooperative Ltd. Birendranagar-2, Surkhet
2 Sanosurkhet Agriculture Cooperative Ltd. Latikoili-5, Surkhet
3 Hariyohira Agriculture and Jadibuti Development Cooperative Ltd. Uttarganga-4, Surkhet
4 Manikapur Farmers Multiple Cooperative Ltd. Latikoili-5, Surkhet
5 Laligurans Multiple Cooperative Ltd. Seri-9, Dailekh
6 Organic Multiple Cooperative Ltd, Jumla Jumla
S.N. Name of Cooperatives Address
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
18 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
2.2: Social and Gender Inclusion
Output 2.2.1: Strategy on Gender and Social Inclusion Formulated
The project document has highly emphasized on mainstreaming gender and social inclusion (GeSI)
at different levels of project intervention ensuring at least 60% women and 25% Dalit / Janajatis
participation. Thus, the project has formulated a strategy on gender and social inclusion focusing
on equal and meaningful participation in decision making, reduction of women’s drudgery, access
to and control over resources, benefit
sharing, service technology and
expanding economic opportunities.
Similarly, enhancing livelihoods condition
and social status of women, Dalits,
Janajatis and the poor people is also the
focus of the strategy. The strategy has
focused to recruit at least 50% women
social mobilizers. Appointment of gender
focal person in PMU and line agencies is
another strategy of HVAP. The strategy
has also been approved by PSC for its implementation.
The GSI strategy has given more attention to make project, its stakeholders and beneficiaries
sensitive and accountable towards gender equity and social inclusion and mainstreaming gender
and social inclusion in project through intervention at three different levels: individual, group /
cooperatives and institutional levels.
Output 2.2.2: Thirty-four trained on Gender and Social Inclusion
A two days training on gender and social inclusion (GeSI) was held from 28-29 June 2012 at
Surkhet. It aimed to sensitize and build capacity of project partners and stakeholders on GeSI
mainstreaming in value chain development. There were altogether 34 participants including 4
women and 13 Dalits and Janajatis representing MoAD, Regional Directorates of Forestry, Livestock
and Agriculture, DADO, DLSO, DFO and DCCI, Women Development Office (WDO) and HVAP/PMU.
During the training, the participants were provided knowledge on concepts and methodology of
GeSI mainstreaming in the project including GeSI mainstreaming approach in VCD-IB. The training
was facilitated by resource persons from HVAP, MoAD and SNV.
2.3: Production and Post Harvest Support:
Once the agribusiness will be selected in each value chain, the project will support groups and
cooperatives in production and post harvest facilities for improving quality and quantity of
production in the respective value chain. By combining the skills and experience of agribusinesses;
and technical expertise from the project, the sub-component would facilitate the production of
selected high value commodities in quantities and qualities required. The sub-component would
involve five investment activities.
Box 2 HIGHLIGHTS OF GSI STRATEGIES
Responsive policies
Institutionalisation
Targeting and Implementation
Balance workload and optimise positive impact
Capacity building
Monitoring and evaluation
Strengthening information and communication
system
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 19
Output 2.3.1: Production and Post Harvest Support Fund Established
The production and post harvest support fund guideline has been developed to create access to
improved technology and services, generation of technology and their dissemination to value chain
actors of project pocket areas. This fund supports project beneficiaries to participate in value chain
activities on up-scaling of improved technology and services, demonstration of technology, action
research/trails and food security aspects by providing fully subsidized grants and supports. This
fund will help to include new groups and other groups which are not involved in bulk marketing
and not eligible for value chain fund. This guideline has come into function after approval from
MoAD and IFAD. This is a live document, thus can later be amended during the implementation if
felt necessary. The process for release of production and post harvest support fund has been given
in figure 7.
Figure 7: Procedures for Production and Post Harvest Support Fund
Output 2.3.2: Production and Post Harvest Support Activities
The project has started some field level activities in four value chains - apple, vegetable seeds,
fresh vegetables and turmeric last year. The project has provided different production inputs along
with technical services to increase the production. The project also conducted training to enhance
the technical skills of the farmers in four value chains in project areas last year.
Application and Proposal From producer group/cooperatives,
traders and agribusiness at local level
to local NGO
Screening, Evaluation &
Recommendation to PMU
By district level evaluation committee,
chaired by DADO (memers-dist. line
agencies, DCCI, LNGO), based on
evaluation criteria.
Awareness Raising Local NGO
Final Approval & Fund Release
PMU
PMU
Call for Application and Proposal
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
20 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Output 2.3.2.1: 1451 HHs Received the Inputs from the Project for Production
The project supported with different inputs for apple, turmeric and off-season vegetable
production to 14 groups and cooperatives last year. The farmer groups and cooperatives in Jumla
(3 groups), Dailekh (4 groups) and Surkhet (7 groups) were provided support with plastic (45 GSM),
vegetable seeds, pesticides, fungicides, sprayer and some growth regulators. The details of
supports have been given in Annex 4.
The projects supported above materials to 1,451 households in three districts, which included 138
Dalits, 187 Janajatis and 1,126 other caste households. The outputs of the support will be reported
in first trimester report of the fiscal year 2012/13. The details on supports have been given in
table7.
Table 7: Project Beneficiary Households by ethnic category
Dalits HHs Janajatis HHs Other Caste HHs Total HHs
1 Jumla 36 25 613 674
2 Surkhet 63 120 238 421
3 Dailekh 39 42 275 356
138 187 1126 1451
RemarksBenefited HHs By Social Category
S.N. District
Total
Output 2.3.4.2: 159 Trained in Production and Post Harvest
Altogether 159 farmers from different groups and cooperatives were trained in vegetables,
turmeric and apple production. Among them; 55 farmers were trained on apple orchard
management in Jumla; 61 farmers on vegetable production in Surkhet; and 29 farmers in Surkhet
district for turmeric production. The project also provided refresher training to 14 leader farmers in
Jumla for production and post harvest management of apple and vegetable seeds.
Practical training on orchard management
training in Jumla
Practical training on Turmeric Production in
Surkhet
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 21
Table 8: Participants of different training by gender and ethnic category
S.
N.
Training Heads Participants
Dalits
Female
Dalits
Total
Janajatis
Female
Janajatis
Total
Other
Caste
Female
Other
Caste
Total
Total
Female
Grand
Total
1 Orchard Management 4 4 0 0 19 51 4 55
2 Refresher training for
Leaders Farmer
o 1 0 0 4 13 4 14
3 Turmeric Production 4 4 0 0 20 25 24 29
4 Vegetable Production 6 11 8 15 19 35 33 51
Total 14 20 8 15 62 124 84 159
Output 2.3.4.3: One Demo Plot Developed
One demonstration plot was developed for summer vegetable production in Uttarganga-8, Surkhet
in coordination with District Agriculture Development Office, Surkhet. The project supported the
input materials like bamboo stalks, wire, pillars, plastic tunnel, seeds and pesticides to the farmers.
The project has introduced the plantation of summer vegetables in a trail system. It is expected
that the neighboring farmers will follow the same practice.
Output 2.3.5: District Agriculture Farming System and Food Security
Programme
This facility has been envisaged to address the issues of adversely affected producers of targeted
value chain commodities due to shifting towards high value commodities. Activities of cereal
production technology and services related to food security and farming system fall under this
category. Some examples are demonstration of newly recommended crop varieties; distribution of
improved seed package; training and farming system action research.
Procedures for district agriculture farming system and food security programme have been
prepared by the project as:
Identification of eligible beneficiaries: Local NGO identifies the beneficiaries adversely affected
by shifting toward high value commodities based on following criteria.
Area of land shifted from traditional crop to high value commodities.
Demonstration Plot in Uttarganga VDC, Surkhet for vegetable Production
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
22 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Changes in household income level due to shifting to high value commodities.
Significant cases of failure of high value commodities crops.
The local NGO will report the findings to concerned DADOs.
Programme and Budget Design: DADO designs the programme and budget to address the
issues of food security and submits to PMU.
Approval: PMU will scrutinise the programme and budget and approve (or disapprove) the
proposal.
Fund Release: Once the proposal is approved, PMU releases fund to DADO as per the proposal.
Procurement: DADO procures required input and implements the activities as per approved
programme and reports to PMU on the progress of programme activities including supporting
documents of expenditure.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The activities under food security support will be monitored and
supervised by PMU as well as Regional Directorate of Agriculture to ensure the effective
implementation of programme.
2.4: Value Chain Fund:
Output 2.4.1: Re-design of Value Chain Fund
The demand-driven fund, totaling amount of USD 4.3 million, would allow value chain groups to
make critical investments to facilitate the production and primary processing/storage of the
selected high value commodities. The range of investments for which the Fund could be used,
would include small-scale infrastructure and equipment required to produce, store and carry out
primary processing and simple conversion such as sorting, grading, cleaning, packaging and seed
cleaning, as well as micro-irrigation schemes. Consideration would also be given to funding on
organic certification.
The Value Chain Fund will be made available for investment at both the demand and supply side
through the two windows as below.
Window 1: 50:50 ratio sub-projects Window 2: 85:15 ratio sub-projects
Provisions
Any registered primary value chain actors
who meet the eligibility criteria can apply
for matching grant fund through window 1.
The matching grant fund will be in 50:50
ratio (i.e. project support will be 50% of
total cost of sub-project and the remaining
50% will be invested by the grant applicant).
The maximum limit of project support for
one sub-project will be US$ 100,000.
Project financial support will be for
maximum three years within the project
period.
Operation can be set-up within or outside
project area with at least 25% of installation
capacity from project area.
Only registered farmer groups and
cooperatives can apply for fund under
window 2.
Project financial support will be 85% of
the total sub-project cost and the grant
applicant will contribute at least 15% of
total project cost which will be 10% in
cash and 5% in kind.
Maximum limit of project support will be
US$ 20,000/sub-project.
Project financial support will be for
maximum 3 years within project period.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 23
Window 1: 50:50 ratio sub-projects Window 2: 85:15 ratio sub-projects
Eligibility criteria
Firms and companies - legally registered
(including Permanent Account
Number/Value Added Tax registration) and
active for at least three years linked with
relevant value chains.
Cooperatives - legally registered and active
at least for three years working in relevant
value chains in project pocket area.
Producers' groups and cooperatives -
formally registered and active for one
year, working in relevant value chains in
project pocket area.
STEPS ACTORS
Figure 8: Grant Application and Business Plan Approval Procedures
Output 2.4.3: Value Chain Fund Guideline Developed
The value chain fund guideline was prepared in the last year. It covers investment modalities of the
sub-projects, and procedures and criteria of sub-projects selection. The Value Chain Fund
Call of EOI
Screening &Short-Listing
Business Plans Evaluation and
Recommendation
Field verification of the
Evaluated Business Plans
PMU
Business Plan Assessment
Panel (BPAP)
Call for Business Plan Short Listed EOIs
Applicant
PMU
EOI Collection PMU and DADO
Business Plan Submission PMU
PMU
Approval and Contract Agreement
PMU
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
24 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Guidelines was implemented after the approval by MoAD (1st July 2012) and IFAD (10 August 2012).
This is a live document and can later be amended during the implementation if felt necessary.
However, such amendments shall be operational only after endorsement from MoAD and IFAD.
2.5: District Participation and Spatial Inclusion Fund:
Output 2.5.1: Twenty-three Trained on Value Chain Development
A four day training/workshop on value chain development and inclusive business (VCD-IB) was held
from 9 - 12 January, 2012 at Surkhet. The aim of the training-workshop was to enhance knowledge
and skills of participants in understanding and applying the value chain development and inclusive
business (VCD/IB) approach in the context of HVAP for pro poor value chain development. There
were 23 participants representing DADOs, DFOs, DLSO, Regional Agriculture Directorate, Regional
Livestock Services Directorate and Regional Forest Directorate of project districts including staff
from Raising Income of Small and Medium Farmers Project (RISMFP) and HVAP/PMU. HVAP hired
the workshop facilitators from Karuna Institute for Sustainable Enterprise and SNV Nepal. During
the training, the participants were provided with knowledge on Value Chain Development
approach, its core concepts and methodologies, identifying and selecting potential value chains
having potential for enhancing employment and incomes of target groups, mapping and analyze
value chains, formulating and upgrading strategies for selected Value Chains, development of value
chain intervention plans and gained the understanding of how to assess performance of Value
Chain Development initiatives.
Output 2.5.2: District Spatial Inclusion Fund Establishment
The project has drafted the implementation guideline of District Spatial Inclusion Fund which will
guide the project towards smooth implementation of the fund.
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT, M&E AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
3.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Output 3.1.1: Project Implementing Manual Published
Project Implementation Manual (PIM) was published in January, 2012 and has been in operation,
which was one of the pre-conditions for the first withdrawal from IFAD. The manual covers the
project basic information, activities, implementing procedures, monitoring and evaluation,
knowledge management, and financial procedures. The second supervision mission (16 May to 2
June 2012) suggested to revise it and get re-published.
Output 3.1.2: NGO Mobilization Guideline Prepared
The NGO mobilization guideline has been drafted. It covers the group identification, and forming
new groups, sensitization on about the project and its implementation modalities, capacity
development of the groups and cooperatives, inclusion of Dalits and Janajatis and risk averse
people etc. The guideline will be guidance for local NGOs to perform their tasks at community level.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 25
Output 3.1.3: Financial Management Manual Prepared
Since the financial management manual has been included the Project Implementation Manual
(PIM) separate financial management guideline has not been developed. The guideline has covered
on about types of account, fund flow mechanism, disbursement procedures, audit procedures,
financial statements, procurement procedures etc.
Output 3.1.4: Three Project Steering Committee (PSC) Meeting Organized
Three PSC meetings were organized during the period of last year (2011/12) for guidance and
strategic directions to the project implementation. The meetings were organized in 17 November
2011, 03 February 2012 and in 28 June 2012 under the chairmanship of Secretary of MoAD. So far,
5 PSC meetings were organized since its implementation.
The PSC provided guidance on the following areas;
The PSC suggested the project to seek contribution of local body in the sub-project sourced
through spatial inclusion fund as much as possible instead of compulsory contribution of
local body (10% of total fund);
Made the provision that groups also registered in District Agriculture Development Office,
District Livestock Service Office and District Forest Office, are eligible for applying for the
project grants under the Value Chain Funds and Production and post harvest facility;
HVAP is in connection with the SNV and ICIMOD for Knowledge Management of the
project. The meeting has a realization to disseminate resource knowledge related to the
project among other projects and programs. So, PSC made decision that HVAP has to
coordinate with Agriculture Information and Communication Centre (AICC) under the
MoAD for the sustainability of knowledge management and knowledge sharing;
The PSC decided to involve and coordinate Agriculture Business Promotion and Market
Development Directorate to strengthen the Market Information System (MIS) of the
project as the Agriculture Business Promotion and Market Development Directorate is the
lead agency for collecting and disseminating the market information, under the
DoA/MoAD;
The PSC directed PMU to propose budget for one more vehicle (Double Cab Pick-up) and
ten motorbikes in the upcoming AWP&B (FY 2069/70) and make a request to IFAD for
necessary re-allocation to fulfill the inadequacy of vehicles;
The PSC approved the Gender and Social Inclusion Strategy and Action Plan for HVAP;
Approved the AWPB of the fiscal year of 2012/2013.
Project steering committee members are participating in PSC meetings
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
26 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Output 3.1.5: Three Project and Consultation Coordination Committee Group
(PCCG) Meeting Organized
Three PCCG meetings were organized during the last fiscal year to provide operational and
implementation inputs to the PMU. The first meeting was organized in 12 November 2011, second
was held in 5 March 2012 and the third was organized in 9 July 2012 under the chairmanship of
Regional Director of Agriculture (also Livestock Services in some meetings). The PCCG has given
guidance on the following areas;
The PCCG suggested the project to go for field implementation as soon as possible and
focused on the sub-projects like storage, processing, grading and packaging as it is a market
led project;
The committee directed the PMU to coordinate with other organizations and I/NGOs to
minimize the duplication of activities and get synergic impact too;
The committee noticed the low progress made on both physical and financial targets. The
committee also suggested completing activities in coming fiscal year on time.
The committee has provided guidance and suggestions on AWP&B of fiscal year 2012/13.
Output 3.1.6: Seven Project Orientation Workshops Organized (District Level)
Seven project districts were oriented on the project modality by organizing District Level Project
Orientation Workshops in seven districts; Achham, Dailekh, Jajarkot, Jumla, Kalikot, Salyan and
Surkhet. The district level project stakeholders were oriented about the project, its modality and
approaches. The potential market centres and production pockets were also identified and mapped
following participatory processes through group work during the orientation programs.
Output 3.1.7: District HVAP Working Group Meetings Organized
District HVAP working groups were formed and meetings were organized in seven districts. Project
document envisaged the provision of District HVAP Working Group in each project districts for
effective implementation of activities and to coordinate and communicate with district
stakeholders. The District Agriculture Development Committee (DADC) under chairmanship of the
Chief of the District Development Committee in the district has been already formed which has
Stakeholders are participating in district project orientation workshops
responsi
This is a
to work
(Achham
Working
continue
apple, gi
in these
Output
Different
compreh
worksho
planning
central
impleme
effective
coordina
organiza
an intera
learn fro
Output
Four Nat
condition
Developm
whereas
The ToRs
the local
hire four
the dem
national
one dat
managem
bility to plan
legal commi
for HVAP a
m, Dailekh, Ja
Group to th
e the respon
nger and ve
districts.
3.1.8: Inte
t levels of Jo
hensive and
p at differe
g and review
level have
entation lev
eness and s
ation meetin
tions involve
action works
m other pro
t 3.1.9: Fo
tional level E
ns for first w
ment Expert
, the High Va
s have been
l NGO as pe
r horticulturi
mand of the
NGO. The P
ta managem
ment respect
n, implement
ittee working
as a HVAP
ajarkot, Juml
he DADC. Th
nsibility of H
getable seed
eraction W
int interactio
effective pla
ent levels. To
workshops
been pro
vel, regular
synergy in
ng each trim
ed in agricul
shop for expe
jects.
ur Experts
Experts have
withdrawal
t, and Fund
alue Agricult
developed t
r the recom
ists, two agr
value chain
PMU is also
ment expert
tively.
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
t and monito
g under the
working gro
a, Kalikot, Sa
he ToRs of H
VAP workin
d value chain
Workshops
on workshop
anning, proje
o include th
have been p
oviding feed
meeting
effort. Sim
mester in P
lture develo
erience shar
s for Proje
been recrui
from IFAD.
s & Contrac
ure Producti
to hire additi
mendation o
ro-forestry e
ns, for techn
hiring two b
t for techn
gress Report
gress Report
or the agricu
District Deve
oup. The me
alyan and Su
VAP working
g group. At
n developme
among th
ps/meetings
ect has made
he district le
planned. Plan
dback and
have been
milarly PMU
PMU, Surkhe
pment will p
ing events w
ect Implem
ted on beha
The M&E Ex
cts Manager
ion Specialis
ional seven e
of the last (s
experts and o
nical backsto
business plan
nical suppor
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
ulture develo
elopment Co
eetings were
urkhet) propo
g group was
the same ti
ent were also
e Project S
were organ
e the arrang
evel issues o
nning and re
suggestion
organized
has been
et where re
participate.
where projec
mentation
alf of the Mo
xpert, Gend
r joined the
t joined the
experts to pr
second) Supe
one livestock
opping to th
n developme
rt to devel
VAP
opment activ
ommittee, w
e organized
osing the To
s endorsed in
ime, interve
o endorsed
Stakeholde
ized with sta
gement of pl
of project, d
view worksh
from resp
among HV
organizing
epresentativ
PMU has als
t will share i
n Contract
oAD, which w
er Social Inc
e HVAP on 2
HVAP on 12
rovide backs
ervision Miss
k expert, on
he local NG
ent officers
lop busines
vities in the d
which was pro
in seven d
Rs of District
n these distr
ntion strate
by the comm
ers Organi
akeholders. F
lanning and
district level
hop in region
pective leve
VAP partne
multi-stake
ves from di
so planned t
its experienc
ted
was one of th
clusion and
28 February
April 2012.
topping sup
sion. The PM
phase wise
GOs, in abse
(through AE
ss plan and
27
district.
oposed
districts
t HVAP
ricts to
gies of
mittees
ized
For the
review
l HVAP
nal and
els. In
ers for
eholder
fferent
to hold
ces and
he pre-
Group
y 2012,
port to
MU will
as per
ence of
EC) and
d data
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
28 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Output 3.1.10: Various Consultancy Services
The project has procured different consultancy services to develop the project implementation
guideline and value chain studies. The project hired SEEPORT Consultancy to develop project
implementation manual (PIM) and ANSAB for value chains studies. Both firms have submitted their
study reports to the project.
Output 3.1.11: Twenty-five Trained on Financial Management
A three days training on financial management was organized by HVAP/PMU in technical support
from IFAD, at the seminar hall of Mid-Western Regional Directorate of Livestock Services, Surkhet
in 20 October 2012. Altogether 25 officials (AEC/FNCCI-2, Office of Financial Control-1, HVAP-10,
IFAD Country Programme Office-1, LFLP-5, MoF-1, and WUPAP-4 & SNV-1) participated the
training. The training was specially targeted to the Ministry of Finance of GoN and IFAD funded
projects (WUPAP, LFLP & HVAP) for common understanding of financial matters within IFAD
funded projects in Nepal. The Country Programme Coordinator (IFAD) started the training with
introduction of IFAD funded projects. The training was facilitated by Finance Officer (IFAD) and
Programme Assistant (IFAD). The training delivered the special account, statement of expenditure,
procurement procedures, withdrawal application, audit reports and other financial procedures. The
training was interactive and comprised slide presentations, case studies and group work.
Output 3.1.12: One Training cum Exposure Visit Organized on Value Chain
HVAP organized training cum exposure visit on Value Chain Development and Inclusive Business in
Vietnam from 11 March 2012 for one week. The event was managed by MDF Indo China Training
and Consultancy and SNV Vietnam. Altogether 18 participants from different stakeholders (district
line agencies, Ministry of Agriculture Development and PMU Staff) participated in the training. The
objectives of the training were to increase the effectiveness of project partners through
networking, and exposing them to best practices in pro-poor sustainable supply chain and inclusive
business development of Vietnam. Field visit programs were also organized during the training. The
participants gained the knowledge on the success factors of real life cases, leading to lesson and
action plan.
Output 3.1.13: Thirty-four Trained on Value Chain and Gender and Social Inclusion
The training programme on value chain development and gender and social inclusion was
organized in 25 June, 2012 for 5 days in Surkhet. Altogether 34 participants from different
stakeholders of HVAP and PMU staff participated in the training. The training programme was
conducted in two parts with three days for value chain development and two days for gender and
social inclusion. The training was facilitated by Value Chain Adviser and others (HVAP), Gender and
Social Inclusion Adviser (HVAP/SNV)), Gender, Social Inclusion and Group Development Expert
(HVAP), Gender and Inclusion Adviser (SNV), Under Secretary (Gender Section, MoAD). In overall,
the workshop was fruitful and was very interactive as shared by the participants.
Output 3.1.14: Booklets, Calendars, Brochures, and Diaries Published
The project published Annual Progress Report 2010/11, project brochure, calendars, diary,
hoarding boards to share the progress and project information to the donor, line ministry and
other stakeholders.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 29
Output 3.1.15: Review and Planning workshop Conducted
The project conducted one regional planning workshop (Nepalgunj) and two internal review and
planning workshop in Surkhet. The project partners and partner staff participated in the review
and planning workshops. The project reviewed the results of the project during the period of one
year and provided guidance to formulate the AWPB for next year 2012/13.
3.2 MONITORING & EVALUATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Output 3.2.1: Monitoring & Evaluation and Knowledge Management System Developed
A comprehensive Monitoring, Evaluation and Knowledge Management System for HVAP has been
developed. The system was prepared with consultation of partners and staff. The system was also
presented to the last Project Supervision and Implementation Support Mission. This system covers
the collection of the data and information, storage of data, use of data, monitoring and evaluation
of results, sharing the results, dissemination of results, discovering knowledge, sharing and
disseminating knowledge etc. The system has been implemented and it will be updated timely
based on partners’ recommendations as well as learning from the field. The handbook of the M&E
System will also be prepared very shortly.
Output 3.2.1: One Project Documentary Prepared
A video documentary of the project approach and modality was developed as per the approved
AWPB 2011/12. A consultancy firm was contracted to construct and develop the project
documentary. The company developed the video documentary of 22:11 minute length which
shows the project approach, modality and also captures the expectation of farmers and/or
agribusinesses.
Output 3.2.2: Information Centre at PMU Established
An information centre has been established at PMU. The information centre is equipped with audio
and visual equipment. The information centre provides the information regarding project as well as
it also collects the information related to the project.
Output 3.2.3: Two Planning and Review Workshop Carried Out
Two internal review and planning workshop was organised in Surkhet in 17-18 April 2012 and in 10
July 2012. The purpose of the internal review and planning workshop were to review and reflect
over HVAP activities accomplished till date, prepare immediate action plan for the next period of
three months and preparatory work for purposed Result Oriented –Annual Work Plan and Budget
(RO-AWPB) FY 2069/70 (2012/13).
Output 3.2.5: Management Information System (MIS)
The project has planned to develop web based MIS at project level to collect and store the project
data and information. The project has also planned to develop Geographical Information System
(GIS) to catch the number of spatial information and maps to work with different value chains
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
30 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
being developed in different geographical areas of three road corridors (Chhinchu-Jajarkot,
Surkhet-Dailekh and Surkhet-Jumla) of the Mid-Western Development Region. It is also important
to show spatial map of existing production pockets of implemented valued chain development
interventions along the road corridors. This needs thorough knowledge of geography, information
system related to geography and to understand available maps. HVAP organized a basic training in
this regard, to meet requirements, on Geographical Information System (GIS) contracting
HIMALAYAN IT Pvt. Ltd. at Surkhet on 1-3 July 2012. In this connection the project has already
developed ToRs to develop and establish MIS as well as GIS at project level to collect, store, analyze
and disseminate the project results.
Output 3.2.6: Three Baseline Survey Started (RIMS, Baseline & Value Chain)
A combined baseline survey (RIMS, Project Baseline and VC baseline) on three value chains in six
districts has been started. The ToRs for baseline studies were developed. The project is still in the
preparatory phase and is making guidelines for various funds and strategies for targeting, M&E and
value chain upgrading of identified value chain commodities. Therefore, no survey and study
conducted in this fiscal year. A common survey instrument for project baseline, Value Chain
baseline and RIMS was developed and ToR for survey was developed. The EoI for survey was also
published in the Kantipur daily dated 13 July 2012. The survey report of 3 value chains (apple,
vegetable seeds and ginger) will be received within December 2012.
Output 3.2.7: Two Project Supervision and Implementation Support Missions
and One Country Program Evaluation Mission Managed
Two project supervision and implementation support missions visited the project during the period
of one year. The first mission visited the project on 19 September 2012. Likewise, the second
mission visited the project from 16 May to 2 June 2012. During the visit the mission supported the
project team for smooth implementation of the project activities. The major recommendations of
the mission during the period of one year are given below;
The mission re-designed the value chain fund and production and post harvest fund;
The mission has recommended suspending the recruitment process of the national NGO at
present. The mission also recommended to the project to make a team of technical experts
at PMU level for backstopping the local NGOs;
The mission recommended the project to make a team for backstopping the DCCIs and
groups and/or cooperatives in business plan preparation by hiring two business plan
development officers and one capacity building officer;
The mission recommended hiring Data Management expert to manage the data of the
project and backstopping the districts and partners team to manage the data and software;
The mission has recommended developing the financial management software to handle
the financial transaction smoothly;
The mission revised the project log frame in consultation with project partners and project
staff. The detail of the revised log frame has been given in Annex 6.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 31
Output 3.2.11: Project Web Page Updated
HVAP website www.hvap.gov.np was developed last year and it is in function since last year. The
project has been updating the web page regularly based on requirement. The notices, reports,
maps and other communication materials are uploaded in the website to increase the access of
project stakeholders and other development actors.
Output 3.2.12: Project Information (program and result) Disseminated
The information regarding the farming of high value agriculture products, NTFP/MAPs and goat
meat was continued to disseminate regularly through the radio program from Regional
Broadcasting of Radio Nepal. The program named as “High Value Agriculture Program” and is
broadcasted every Saturday (at 05:30 PM-05:45 PM) since 5 November 2011. The same program is
being broadcasted through Bheri FM every Tuesday (7.30 – 7.45 PM). Sometimes the project also
uses local news papers and national news papers as well as local and national FMs to disseminate
the project information. Likewise, the project has been updating in its web page
(www.hvap.gov.np) and disseminating project related information regularly. The project has also
been updating and disseminating the market price information on webpage
(www.agripricenepal.com) in coordination with AEC and DCCI. The project published its manuals,
progress reports, brochures, calendars, diaries etc to disseminate the project information. The
project participated in different trade fair to disseminate the project related information. Besides,
the project has organized meetings, workshops, orientation and sharing events to share its
information at community level.
Output 3.2.13: Communication and Institutional Development Strategy Drafted
The project communication strategy was drafted in consultation with PMU staff and stakeholders.
Key informant interviews and focus group discussion were held for target audience analysis and
SWOT analysis. Based on the project goals and objectives the communication strategy was
developed which include strategies and action points for (i) internal communication, (ii) PMU
learning, (iii) knowledge sharing and public awareness and (iv) policy dialogue.
Output 3.2.14: Participated in Knowledge Sharing Events
Project staff participated in various knowledge sharing events organized by other organizations to
share HVAP approach and the learning /cases of HVA-IB Pilot Project as listed below.
Inclusive Business Approach and Experience: HVA-IB Pilot Project in Agribusiness
Promotion Workshop organized by Project for Agriculture Commercialization and Trade
(PACT);
Organic apple experience of Jumla in workshop organized by Nepal Permaculture Group;
and
A case on Jumla apple (from sapling to satisfaction): Increasing market access for small
apple farmers by brokering the relation with national agribusinesses) for an international
workshop “From Islands of Success to Seas of Change”, where IFAD was one of the
organizers.
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
32 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Output 3.2.15: Twenty-two Staff Trained in Knowledge Management
One day training on knowledge management was held on 13 January 2012 at Surkhet following the
VCD-IB training cum workshop. The trainers delivered the concept, components and principles of
knowledge and knowledge management (KM); the differences among data, information and
knowledge and their management and typical project KM cycle. There were 22 participants
including HVAP and project stakeholders' staff. The Knowledge Management Expert from HVAP
facilitated the training.
Financial management guideline of the project has been prepared within the Project
Implementation Manual (PIM). Financial management guideline covers the financial procedures,
statement of expenditure, financial report formats, audit procedures etc. Based on the needs and
financial requirements HVAP has been developing Financial Management Information System
(FMIS) to enhance the entire financial management of the project. It provides reports on source
and use of funds, physical progress and procurement status. This also helps to monitor the overall
progress linking physical progress with financial disbursement.
Expenditure
During the fiscal year of 2011/12, the project achieved low in terms of both physical as well as
financial outputs. The project made financial achievement of 43.85% (86.31 millions) against
planned budget of 196.83 millions in the last fiscal year. Due to the delay in hiring process of the
local NGOs, cancelation of national NGO recruitment, modification of project’s value chain and
production post harvest funds, the project was unable to meet its target during the period of one
year. The summary sheet of the financial achievement has been given in Table 13 and 14. The
detail of the physical and financial progress has been given in Annex 7.
Table 9: Financial Achievement of the Fiscal year 2011/12
(Amount in NRs., 000)/Exchange Rate US$ 1=NRs 78
S.N Components Planned of Fiscal Year 2011/12 Expenditure of Fiscal Year 2011/12
MoAD SNV AEC Total MoAD SNV AEC Total Achieved %
1 Pro-Poor Value Chain
Development 57,871.02 5,878.00 63749.02 46,453 5486.02 51,938.61 81.47
2 Inclusion & Support for
Value Chain Initiatives 69330.00 1944.00 0.00 71274.00 1774.30 900.24 0.00 2,674.54 3.75
2A. Group Formation &
Strengthening
23,500.00 23500.00 282.60 282.60 1.20
2B. Social & Gender
Inclusion
7,600.00
1,944.00 9544.00 737.00 900.24 1,637.24 17.15
2C. Production & Post
Harvest Support
24,400.00 24400.00 754.7 754.70 3.09
2D. Value Chain Fund 10,000.00 10000.00 0
- -
2E. District
Participation & Spatial
Inclusion
3,830.00 3830.00 0 - -
3
Program Management
(Including M&E and
KM)
57,077.00
4,731.00 61808.00 30029.30 1672.13 31,701.43 51.29
Total 126,407.00 64,546.02 5,878.00 196831.02 31803.60 49024.95 5486.02 86314.57 43.85
Percentage on Total 64.22 32.79 2.99 100.00 36.85 56.80 6.36 100.00
Achieved Percent
(Partners) 25.16 75.95 93.33 43.85
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 33
Table 10: Cumulative Financial Achievement
(Amount in NRs., 000 )/Exchange Rate US$ 1=NRs 78
S.N Components
Cumulative Plan (Till 16 July 2012) Cumulative Expenditure (Till 16 July 2012)
MoAD SNV AEC Total
MoAD SNV AEC Total Achieve
d %
1 Pro-Poor Value Chain
Development 74,505.61 8,273.00 82,778.61 59,963.11 6897.69 66,860.80 80.77
2 Inclusion & Support for
Value Chain Initiatives 69,430.00 1,944.00 - 71,374.00 1,774.30 900.24 - 2,674.54 3.75
2A. Group Formation &
Strengthening 23,600.00 23,600.00 282.6 282.60 1.20
2B. Social & Gender
Inclusion 7,600.00 1,944.00 9,544.00 737.00 900.24 1,637.24 17.15
2C. Production & Post
Harvest Support 24,400.00 24,400.00 754.7 754.70 3.09
2D. Value Chain Fund 10,000.00 10,000.00 0 - 0.00
2E. District
Participation & Spatial
Inclusion
3,830.00 3,830.00 0 - 0.00
3
Program Management
(Including M&E and
KM)
82,023.00 4,974.00 86,997.00 42902.94 1917.13 44,820.07 51.52
Total 151,453.00 81,423.61 8,273.00 241,149.61 44,677.24 62,780.48 6,897.69 114,355.41 47.42
Percent in Total 62.80 33.76 3.43 100.00 39.07 54.90 6.03 100.00
Percent in Partners 29.50 77.10 83.38 47.42
Percent In Total Project
Fund (1472.1 million) 7.97
Chart 10: Financial Achievement by Components during the Fiscal Year 2011/12
The financial achievement of the project was 43.85% during the reporting period. The cumulative
financial achievement of the project was 47.42% during the period of two years against the target.
The project achieved only 7.97% against total project fund (18.87 million USD) during the period of
two years.
The financial achievement of the PMU, SNV and AEC were 25.16%, 75.95% and 93.33% respectively
against their target during the period of Fiscal Year 2011/12. The charts 11 and 12 describe the
reporting year and cumulative financial achievements.
Component 1 Component 2 Component 3
Planned NRs. 63,749 71,274 61,808
Achieved NRs. 51,939 2,674.54 31,701.43
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Am
ou
nt
in N
Rs.
Th
ou
san
ds
Financial Achievement in Fiscal Year 2011/12 By Components
34
C
Disburs
The tota
(SDR 95,
period, t
in table 1
AI
hd
Chart 11
Chart 12: Cum
sement:
l disburseme
,00,000). Of
three have a
11.
Planned N
Achieved N
Achieved %
20,0
40,0
60,0
80,0
100,0
120,0
140,0
Am
ou
n t
NR
s. I
n t
ho
usa
nd
sFin
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Planned
Achieve
Achieve
Am
ou
nt
NR
s. i
n t
ho
usa
nd
s
C
A
: Financial Pla
mulative Financ
ent till 15 Jul
f the four w
lready been
Rs.
NRs.
%
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
nancial Pla
0
0,000
0,000
0,000
0,000
0,000
0,000
0,000
0,000
d NRs.
ed NRs.
ed %
Cumulative
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
anned VS Achi
cial Planned V
ly 2012 was
withdrawal a
disbursed. T
MoAD
126,407
31,804
25.16
anned VS
Yea
MoAD
151,453
44,677
29.50
Financial P
gress Report
gress Report
ieved By Partn
VS Achieved By
10.67% on it
applications
The details o
6
49,
7
Achieved
ar 2011/1
SN
81,4
62,78
77.
Planned VS A
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
ners during the
y Partners dur
ts original all
submitted
of fund and
SNV
64,546
,024.95
75.95
By Partne
12
NV
424
80.48
.10
Achieved B
VAP
e Fiscal Year 2
ring the period
location of IF
to IFAD du
disbursemen
A
5,8
5,48
93
ers in Fisc
AEC
8,273
6,897.69
83.38
By Partners
2011/12
d of two years
FAD loan and
ring the rep
nt have been
AEC
878
86.02
3.33
al
d grant
porting
n given
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 35
Table 11: IFAD Grant and Loan Disbursements (In SDR, up to 15/7/2012)
Cat
ego
ry
Category/
Description
Original
Allocation
Revised
Allocati
on
DisbursementW/A
pending
WA to be
Submitted
Balance
(3-5)
Per cent
disbursed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
I Vehicles and
equipment 100,000.00 88,342.26 - 621.34 11,657.74 88.34
II
Studies,
surveys,
Trainings, and
Workshop
1,700,000.00 68,136.47 - 21,308.39 1,631,863.53 4.01
III
Service
provider
contract
2,500,000.00 32,862.96 243,203.29 14,253.44 2,467,137.04 1.31
IV Fund 3,300,000.00 - - 4,509.80 3,300,000.00 0.00
V.a Salaries 540,000.00 7,017.66 - 17,347.80 532,982.34 1.30
V.b
Operational
and
maintainence
400,000.00 47,001.62 - 22,311.86 352,998.38 11.75
VI Unallocated 960,000.00 - - - 960,000.00 0.00
Initial deposit - 770,707.96 - - (770,707.96)
Total 9,500,000.00 1,014,068.92 243,203.29 80,352.63 8,485,939.08 10.67
Procurement:
The project procured vehicles, laptop computers, desktop computers and other logistic materials in
the last fiscal year to run the office and implement the project activities. The detail of the procured
materials has been given in Annex 8.
HVAP has completed its second year of implementation. The project has studied and analyzed six
value chains and finalized intervention strategies for three value chains. Important guidelines for
the operation of different types of project fund and project intervention strategies were prepared
in this fiscal year. Project has been empowering DCCIs, assessing their capacities and facilitating for
preparing action plans. Though less, it could implement some field level activities despite of non-
engagement of local NGOs. It has developed M&E systems including reporting and data collection
formats, designed the gender and social inclusion strategy and revised the value chain and
production input fund provisions. The physical and financial progress made by the project was
52.58% and 43.85 % respectively. Though the project achieved lesser physical and financial
progress and faced several problems and challenges, it has been able to prepare the ground on
which future project activities will be implemented smoothly at the field levels. Coordination and
supports from project stakeholders; and regular monitoring and implementation support from
MoAD and IFAD have directed the PMU to implement the project more effectively.
Based on the activities carried out so far, the following lessons have been learnt:
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
36 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Capacity development of the DCCIs is essential to increase their facilitation skill to them to
coordinate with the agribusinesses and traders sustainably in the respective districts;
The project has made some modification in the implementation modality following the last
supervision and implementation support mission, is too early and modification is done without
experiencing the existing modality;
The Capacity Building of the value chain actors is necessary to develop their entire business
plans for sustainability of the pro-poor value chains;
The project is still unable to start the value chain development activities at community level due
to the absence of local implementing organizations. In absence of local partner, the project
could not expect the community mobilization. Therefore the project has to procure the services
of local NGOs to start value chain development activities at the community level.
The project realized the need of support and coordination from regional and district line
agencies for sustainability of the project interventions.
Project need to explore the existing groups and facilitate them to engage in HVAP activities, as
there are number of groups and cooperatives already formed by government and non-government
organizations. New groups only have to be formed if there are no any groups in the HVAP
command (pocket) areas and facilitated them accordingly to engage them in value chains.
1. The present market information flow mechanism from the DCCI is not still sufficient to
address the farmers’ needs. AEC has planned the flow of information through display boards
in coming year. In addition, as most of the farmers have now access to mobile in the rural
community of Nepal, SMS would be the effective mean to provide the market information
on the farmers’ hand easily. It is supposed to be in function in coordination with DCCI and
Nepal Telecom. Further, the facilities regarding technical information can also be added in
the SMS system as per the farmers' needs.
2. As HVAP experienced that a long time taken for value chain studies with huge budget
expenses, the next value chain studies will have to be conducted by the PMU itself by
following appropriate methodology in a very short period and spending very limited budget.
Few but very potential priority commodities will be selected for this and picture on
production clusters, markets and its facilities, problems and constraints of value chain actors
based on the clusters and markets will be explored.
3. There seems no possibilities of engaging only one anchor company in each value chain
except in vegetable seeds (as seen so far) as per the concept and approaches of Inclusive
Business, and there are demand side competitions are increasing (for example in apple
also). Therefore, competitive engagement of agribusiness companies/traders needs to be
adopted so as to benefit more to the rural producers.
4. The regional directorates (agriculture/livestock/forestry) and DADOs/DLSOs/DFOs will be
mobilized in monitoring, supervision, coordination and technical supports so as to ensure
and verify the quality of services and for sustainability of the project interventions.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
3
7
G.
AN
NE
XE
S:
An
nex
1:
Pre
sen
t st
atu
s of
Valu
e C
hain
s
S.N
. V
alu
e C
ha
in
Va
lue
Ch
ain
Cyc
le
VC
Se
lect
ion
/ye
ar
VC
An
aly
sis/
yea
r In
terv
en
tio
n
Stra
teg
y/ye
ar
VC
Imp
lem
en
tati
on
/Ye
ar
12
34
56
1
2
34
56
12
34
56
12
34
56
1
Ap
ple
2
Gin
ge
r
3
Ve
ge
tab
le s
ee
ds
4
Go
at
5
Tim
ur
6
Tu
rme
ric
7
Off
-se
aso
n V
eg
eta
ble
s (T
om
ato
, ca
lulif
low
er/
cab
ba
ge
,
be
an
/pe
a-p
od
s)
8
Ora
ng
e
9
Sug
an
dh
aw
al
10
Ja
tam
asi
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
38 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Annex 2: List of the project staff
Project Management Unit (PMU) Staff
Thematic Groups Name of Professionals Designation
Team Leader Rajendra Prasad Bhari Project Manager
PCM Thematic
Group Hari Prasad Gurung Senior Agriculture Officer
Eelco Baan Senior Technical Advisor
Prakash Pudasaini Account Officer
Ghan Bahadur GC. Administration Assistant
Om Acharya Support Officer/SNV
PME Thematic
Group Krishna Thapa Monitoring & Evaluation Expert
Sirish Pun Planning Officer
Sanjib Chaudhary Communication and Knowledge
Management Adviser
PPS-FC Thematic
Group Gopal Prasad Shrestha
High Value Agriculture
Production Specialist
Shiromani Pokhrel Fund & Contract Manager
Ghanashyam Chaudhary Agriculture Officer
Vacant Agri. Engineer
Surendra Yadav Livestock Development Officer
Guru Prasad Adhikari Agriculture Technician
Shreelal Chaudhary Livestock Technician
GSI-CD Thematic
Group Tribhuban Paudel
Gender, Social Inclusion & Group
Development Expert
Sushila K. Thapa Magar Gender & Social Inclusion Advisor
Damodar Kanel Producer Organization
Development Advisor
Padam Bhandari Institutional Dev/Org
Strengthening Advisor
Vacant (from AEC) Capacity Development Officer
VC-IB Thematic
Group Sanjeev Shrestha Value Chain Adviser
Madan Rauniyar Inclusive Business Advisor
Madhuwan Shrestha Inclusive Business Officer
Keshab Bahadur Karki Value Chain Development Officer
Vacant (from AEC) Business Development Officer
Support Group Kalpana BK Computer Operator
Shiu Prasad Chaudhary Driver
Maniram Chaudhary Support Staff
Balkrishna Sapkota Support Staff
Krishna Bohora Support Staff
HVAP Liaison Office, Kathmandu
Anil Kumar Acharya Liaison Officer
Suresh Marashini Admin staff
Prakriti Bhattarai Computer operator
Jitendra Maharjan Driver
Prabodh Yadav Support staff
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 39
Annex 3: Highlights of comprehensive monitoring and evaluation in HVAP
The M&E is the major management task of the project. It gives suggestions and real situation
analysis to management team to take decisions to steer the project in intended manner. A
comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation System of HVAP has been developed. It integrates three
tools RIMS, Logframe and DCED Result Chain. The detail of M&E System will be reported
separately. The major features of the M&E System of HVAP are as follows:
Integrated Approach of three tools:
The M&E System of HVAP integrates three tools like Result and Impact Monitoring System (RIMS-
IFAD), Project Log Frame and Result Chain of Donor Committee Enterprise Development Standard
(DCED Result Chain). The project monitor and evaluate its’ results based on these tools. The project
will carry out annual outcome monitoring by household survey of each value chain based on log
frame and result chain. The outcome monitoring will show each year whether the project reached
its overall targets and provide feedback to the management for further strategy if needed.
Decentralized Data and Information Collection System:
The data and information will be collected in four levels based on the responsibility of the project
and partners staff. Total of 23 formats have developed collect data of the project. The system has
four levels of formats which named A, B, C, and D which will fill be filled by social mobilisers, district
coordinators, partners’ organizations and PMU professionals. The M&E division will compile all
data, verify and then use and disseminate accordingly. The following figure explains itself;
40
Trackin
Individ
The M&E
househo
be tracke
of its inte
through
Use MI
MIS is a
data coll
outputs,
The MIS
and will
ng the P
dual Produ
E system has
old level data
ed and store
erventions p
internet from
S and GIS
necessary t
lection cent
production
also helps st
show the da
A
Figur
Production
ucers and
s developed
a like inputs
ed in MIS. Th
periodically b
m anywhere
to Manag
ool to collec
re will be d
and sales, t
taff to carry
ata like collec
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
e 9: Decentra
n, Consum
Traders:
its formats t
supply, prod
his data will
by crop cycle
.
ge and Sto
ct and store
eveloped at
target and a
out the task
ction centre
a
P
gress Report
gress Report
alized Data C
mption, S
to collect da
duction, cons
help the pro
e. The projec
ore the Da
e data and in
t PMU level
chievements
ks in short pe
s, market ce
M&E
PMU Professionals/agencies/Audit Gro
Partners/LineagenciRecipient-C
District Coordina
Social Mobilize
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
Collection Sys
Sales and
ta of individ
sumption, co
oject to iden
t stakeholde
ta of the P
nformation f
and will co
s etc from th
eriod efficien
entres, produ
/Line oup-D
es/Grant C
ator-B
r-A
A
B
B
C
A
C
D
D
C
VAP
stem
d Income
ual produce
ollection, sal
tify the outp
ers can get a
Project:
for future us
llect the da
he district d
ntly. The GIS
uction cluste
A2
B3 B1
A4
B2
C3
C4
A1
C2
D1
B4
D2
A3
D3
C1
C5
C6
Data of
rs and trade
es and incom
puts and out
ccess in thos
se. The web
ta like, inpu
irectly by in
will be estab
ers/pockets o
A5
A6
C7
C8
C9
f the
rs. The
me will
tcomes
se data
based
uts and
ternet.
blished
of each
A7
value ch
before a
Annual
The annu
find the
to carry o
Knowle
Everyone
organisa
is called
HVAP.
The HVA
developm
innovatio
story te
commun
managem
MIS
GIS
Inputs
ain etc alon
nd after scen
F
l Outcome
ual outcome
level of achi
out the outc
edge Mana
e has know
tional object
knowledge
AP will manag
ment actors
ons and influ
lling (farme
nity), peer as
ment system
s
ng the road
nario of proj
Figure 10: Da
e Monitori
e survey will
evements by
ome monito
agement a
wledge that
tives. The pr
managemen
ge the know
s, for reduc
uencing poli
er to farme
ssist (organi
m of HVAP.
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
corridors ge
ect interven
ata and Inform
ing by Hou
be carried
y comparing
oring.
and learni
can be use
rocess of ide
nt. Knowled
ledge in acce
ction of rur
cies. The HV
ers), commu
sational leve
gress Report
gress Report
eographically
tion as well a
mation Collec
usehold Su
for each val
g with baselin
ing:
ed to get s
ntifying, cap
dge managem
essible way t
al poverty
VAP will use
unities of p
el) etc. The
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
y. The inform
as online in G
ction, and Di
urvey:
lue chain. It
ne data. The
success of
pturing, using
ment is one
to the projec
by promoti
different to
ractice (gro
following di
VAP
mation will b
Google Map
issemination
helps proje
e consultancy
project obje
g and dissem
of the main
ct stakeholde
ng good pr
ols to share
oup to grou
iagram refle
be shown in
.
ct managem
y firm will be
ectives as w
minating know
n M&E activ
ers as well as
ractice, scal
its knowled
up/ commun
cts the know
41
n maps
ment to
e hired
well as
wledge
ities of
s other
ing up
dge like
nity to
wledge
42 A
Figu
Annual Pro
Annual Prog
ure 11: Know
gress Report
gress Report
wledge Manag
t 2011-12
2011-12/HV
gement Syste
VAP
em
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
4
3
An
nex
4:
Res
ult
Ch
ain
of
Ap
ple
, V
egeta
ble
seed
an
d G
inger V
alu
e C
hain
An
nex
4.1
: R
esu
lts
Ch
ain
of
Ap
ple
Valu
e C
hain
Pro
du
ctio
n
Project interventions Service Market Output Service Market Outcome Impact Enterprise Level Impact Poverty Level
Incr
ease
d n
et in
com
e o
f
HH
s (N
PR
300
00/h
h D
irec
t
& N
PR
1000
0/h
h In
dir
)
Scal
e(75
0 D
irec
t H
Hs
+
2,00
0 In
dir
HH
s)
Trai
n L
AR
Fs &
lead
farm
ers
for
pro
du
ctio
n o
f
org
anic
fer
tiliz
ers
and
bio
-pes
tici
des
Cre
ate
d 2
60
ne
t
ad
dit
ion
al j
ob
s
Sup
po
rt n
urs
ery
ow
ner
s to
imp
lem
ent
nu
rser
y
guid
elin
es a
nd
to
pro
du
ce h
ealt
hy
sap
lings
.
Pro
du
cers
rep
ort
incr
ease
d a
cces
s to
qu
alit
y p
lan
tin
g
mat
eria
ls a
nd
tech
nic
al a
dvi
ce
Su
pp
ort
NA
RC
fo
r
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
sup
ply
of
Ap
his
ma
li
an
d d
em
on
stra
tio
n
on
ap
ple
va
rie
tie
s
Up
dat
e kn
ow
-
ho
w o
f
exis
tin
g LA
RFs
and
su
pp
ort
them
fo
r
com
mer
cial
serv
ice
pro
visi
on
Su
pp
ort
fo
r sm
all
irri
ga
tio
n s
che
me
s
(VC
F)
Intr
od
uce
on
-far
m
grad
ing
for
pro
du
cers
& s
up
po
rt
coo
per
ativ
es f
or
colle
ctiv
e m
arke
tin
g
& s
tora
ge
Sup
po
rt a
grib
iz-
stat
e d
ialo
gue
for
sub
sid
y
arra
nge
men
t
Sup
po
rt c
oo
per
ativ
e
and
/or
agri
bu
sin
ess
for
grad
ing
&
pac
kagi
ng
faci
lity
Re
gis
tere
d n
urs
ery
ow
ne
rs a
re t
rain
ed
on
qu
alit
y sa
plin
g
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
tech
nic
al a
dvi
ce
pro
visi
on
At le
ast 5
sm
all i
rrig
atio
n
sche
mes
are
cons
truc
ted/
mai
ntai
ned
Qu
alit
y sa
plin
gs a
nd
tech
nic
al a
dvi
ce
avai
lab
le in
th
e
mar
ket
LAR
Fs a
nd
lea
d
farm
ers
are
ca
pa
ble
to p
rovi
de
tra
inin
g
to f
arm
ers
NA
RC R
adjik
ot
esta
blis
hes
at le
ast 3
Aph
is m
alli
prod
uctio
n
cent
ers
with
dem
o
At
leas
t 40
LA
RFs
get
up
dat
ed o
n
tech
nic
al k
no
w-
ho
w f
or
org
anic
app
le
pro
du
ctio
n
Ap
ple
pro
du
cers
ha
ve
imp
rove
d a
cce
ss t
o
org
an
ic in
pu
ts &
tech
nic
al a
dvi
ce f
rom
ag
ro-v
ets
At
leas
t 20
LA
RFs
are
cap
able
to
pro
vid
e se
rvic
es
on
a f
ee b
asis
Par
tici
pat
ing
pro
du
cers
pra
ctic
e o
n-f
arm
gra
din
g
for
thei
r ap
ple
s
At
leas
t 45
0
HH
s h
ave
369
ha
of
lan
d
un
der
per
man
ent
Co
op
erat
ives
and
/or
agri
biz
are
trai
ned
on
and
giv
en
mat
chin
g gr
ants
for
pro
du
ct
div
ersi
fica
tio
n
At l
east
1
mod
ern
grad
ing
& p
acka
ging
faci
lity
esta
blis
hed
Par
tici
pat
ing
pro
du
cers
su
pp
ly
grad
ed a
pp
les
to
5 co
op
ru
n c
ella
r
sto
res
At
leas
t 10
0 M
T o
f
app
le r
ecei
ve a
t le
ast
NP
R 6
0/K
g at
far
m g
ate
(off
-sea
son
pri
ce)
Ap
ple
pro
du
cers
rea
lize
pro
du
ctio
n
incr
em
en
t b
y a
t le
ast
30
%
Trai
n ag
ro-v
ets
on te
chni
cal k
now
ledg
e
for
deliv
ery
of o
rgan
ic in
puts
and
stre
ngth
en th
eir
linka
ges
with
org
anic
inpu
t sup
plie
rs
Mob
ilize
LAR
Fs
for
loca
l tra
inin
g
& p
lant
prot
ectio
n
cam
paig
n D
eliv
er t
rain
ing
on
an
d
pro
vid
e m
atch
ing
gran
t su
pp
ort
fo
r
pro
du
ct d
iver
sifi
cati
on
for
coo
ps/
agri
biz
De
velo
p &
de
live
r tr
ain
ing
pa
cka
ge
to
PO
s
& s
up
po
rt t
he
m
for
reg
istr
ati
on
At le
ast 1
5 ag
ro-v
ets
are
know
ledg
eabl
e
to s
uppl
y or
gani
c in
puts
and
are
link
ed
with
org
anic
inpu
ts s
uppl
iers
Each
LA
RF o
rgan
ises
at l
east
3 VD
C le
vel t
rain
ing
and
plan
t pro
tect
ion
cam
paig
n
At
leas
t 60
%
pro
du
cers
ad
op
t
imp
rove
d
pra
ctic
es f
or
org
anic
ap
ple
pro
du
ctio
n
Agr
ibiz
mon
itor
prod
uctio
n
site
s &
inte
ract
with
prod
ucer
s/
coop
s
Agr
ibiz
&
Co
op
s d
evel
op
mu
tual
un
der
stan
din
g
& lo
bb
y fo
r
op
en s
ub
sid
y
At
leas
t 3
coo
per
ativ
es
and
/or
agri
bu
sin
esse
s
enga
ge in
div
ersi
fyin
g ap
ple
Po
st-h
arv
est
loss
re
du
ced
at
lea
st b
y
50
% f
rom
th
e
ba
se p
eri
od
At le
ast 1
0%
mor
e su
pplie
rs
enga
ges
in
appl
e
mar
ketin
g
At
lea
st 6
0%
pro
du
cers
re
po
rt
incr
ea
sed
acc
ess
to o
rga
nic
inp
uts
an
d s
erv
ice
s
Par
tici
pat
ing
agri
bu
sin
ess
real
ize
75%
sal
es in
crem
ent
com
par
ed t
o t
he
bas
e p
erio
d
Par
tici
pat
ing
pro
du
cers
rep
ort
50%
incr
emen
t
in m
arke
ted
su
rplu
s
and
10%
pri
ce
incr
emen
t
Sa
les
of
Jum
la a
pp
les
in n
ati
on
al m
ark
et
incr
ea
sed
by
50
%
Sale
s of
loca
l pro
cess
ed
appl
es o
ccup
y at
leas
t
10%
sha
re in
nat
iona
l
mar
kets
BE
EP
O s
tre
ng
the
nin
g &
Ma
rke
t li
nk
Po
st-h
arv
est
Inp
ut
sup
ply
Sup
po
rt D
CC
Is o
n
mar
ket
info
syst
em
stre
ngt
hen
ing
Faci
lita
te b
uy-
ba
ck &
co
ntr
act
farm
ing
2 D
CCIs
are
trai
ned
on
mar
ket i
nfo
colle
ctio
n an
d
upda
te; 2
mar
ket
info
sys
tem
s
esta
blis
hed
DC
CIs
mo
nit
or
mar
ket
dem
and
and
tre
nd
s &
regu
lar
up
dat
e
mar
ket
info
25
PO
s
are
tra
ine
d &
reg
iste
red
as
coo
ps
Ag
rib
usi
ne
ss &
coo
pe
rati
ves
de
velo
p t
he
ir
ow
n b
usi
ne
ss
pla
ns
Co
op
erat
ives
an
d
agri
bu
sin
esse
s si
gned
at le
ast
4 co
ntr
acts
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
44
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
An
nex
4.2
: R
esu
lts
Ch
ain
of
Veg
eta
ble
See
d V
alu
e C
ha
in
Impact Enterprise Level Project interventions Service Market Output
Level Outcome
Lin
k fa
rme
rs
&a
gro
vets
wit
h a
nch
or
com
pa
nie
s fo
r
fou
nd
ati
on
se
ed
s
Sup
po
rt a
gro
vets
for
sust
ain
able
inp
uts
su
pp
ly
Su
pp
ort
NA
RC
fo
r
fou
nd
ati
on
se
ed
s
ma
na
ge
me
nt
Dev
elop
and
del
iver
TO
T
pack
age
on s
eed
prod
uctio
n &
man
agem
ent,
on
qual
ity in
spec
t
for
LRPs
& le
ad fa
rmer
s
Ag
rib
iz c
oa
ch
FGs/
Co
op
s o
n s
ee
d
lab
elli
ng
pra
ctic
e
Su
pp
ort
fo
r
sma
ll ir
rig
ati
on
sch
em
es
Sup
po
rt F
Gs/
Co
op
s to
esta
blis
h s
eed
co
llect
ion
&
sto
rage
fac
iliti
es, s
eed
extr
acti
on
/th
resh
ing
faci
litie
s an
d s
eed
lab
ora
tory
25 L
RP
s &
lead
farm
ers
are
trai
ned
on
see
d p
rod
uct
ion
&
man
agem
ent,
an
d o
n
qu
alit
y in
spec
tio
n
Su
pp
ort
ag
rib
usi
ne
sse
s fo
r
est
ab
lish
ing
se
ed
pro
cess
ing
fa
cilit
y
Sup
po
rt D
CC
Is f
or
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
syst
em s
tren
gth
enin
g
Dev
elop
& d
eliv
er tr
aini
ng
pack
age
on s
eed
post
-
harv
est m
anag
emen
t for
FGs/
Coop
s
Ca
pa
cita
te
Co
op
s o
n
ma
rke
tin
g
an
d b
usi
ne
ss
Ag
rove
ts a
re t
rain
ed
on
inp
ut
use
ad
vice
an
d o
n s
ust
ain
ab
le
inp
uts
su
pp
ly &
are
lin
ked
wit
h in
pu
t
com
pa
nie
s
NA
RC is
cap
able
to m
anag
e
foun
datio
n se
eds
and
able
to a
dvic
e
seed
pro
duce
rs o
n
seed
man
agem
ent
LRP
s &
lead
far
mer
s
trai
n s
eed
pro
du
cers
& p
rovi
de
seed
pro
du
ctio
n/q
ual
ity
insp
ecti
on
ser
vice
s
Agr
ovet
s m
ake
foun
datio
n
seed
s &
oth
er in
puts
+
advi
ce a
vaila
ble
NA
RC
pro
vid
es
advi
ce t
o f
arm
ers
on
fo
un
dat
ion
seed
man
agem
ent
Imp
rove
pro
du
ctio
n-
ma
rke
t
con
ne
ctiv
ity
Su
pp
ort
Ag
rib
usi
ne
ss-
Sta
te d
ialo
gu
e
Pro
du
cer
org
an
isa
tio
n
stre
ng
the
nin
g &
mo
bili
sati
on
Seed
pro
du
cers
rec
eive
/pu
rch
ase
fou
nd
atio
n s
eed
s fr
om
an
cho
r co
mp
anie
s &
oth
er in
pu
ts +
ad
vice
fro
m a
gro
vets
, as
wel
l
as a
dvi
ce o
n f
ou
nd
atio
n s
eed
man
agem
ent
fro
m N
AR
C
5 ir
riga
tio
n s
chem
es
wit
h 2
0 h
a co
mm
and
area
co
nst
ruct
ed
/mai
nta
ined
At
lea
st 2
00
HH
s
acc
ess
to
ye
ar
rou
nd
irr
iga
tio
n
At
leas
t 5
seed
co
llect
ion
&
sto
rage
fac
iliti
es, 5
see
d
extr
acti
on
/th
resh
ing
faci
litie
s
& 2
see
d la
bo
rato
ries
con
stru
cted
FGs/
Coop
s ar
e tr
aine
d on
see
d
post
-har
vest
man
agem
ent
At
leas
t 1
mo
der
n
seed
pro
cess
ing
mac
hin
e
esta
blis
hed
25
FG
s p
rod
uce
50
MT
qu
alit
y ve
ge
tab
le s
ee
ds
wit
h
10
% i
ncr
em
en
t a
nn
ua
lly
All
the
fa
cilit
ies
con
stru
cte
d a
re
op
era
tio
na
l
The
seed
pro
cess
ing
faci
lity
is
oper
atio
nal&
agri
biz
mak
e th
eir
biz
plan
s
FGs/
Co
op
s p
rod
uce
see
ds
bas
ed o
n la
bel
ling
stan
dar
ds
Ag
rib
usi
ne
sse
s b
uy
lab
elle
d
see
ds
fro
m F
Gs/
Co
op
s A
t le
ast
10%
of
seco
nd
ary
HH
s in
see
d s
ub
-sec
tor
bec
om
e m
emb
ers
of
coo
per
ativ
es
Co
op
s a
re
tra
ine
d o
n
ma
rke
tin
g
Ma
rke
t in
form
ati
on
syst
em
est
ab
lish
ed
& D
CC
Is s
taff
tra
ine
d o
n m
ark
et
info
co
lle
ctio
n &
up
da
te
Infr
astr
uct
ure
con
stru
cted
(5)
DC
CIs
mo
nit
or
mar
ket
dem
and
& t
ren
ds
and
up
dat
e m
arke
t in
fo f
or
Co
op
s
Co
op
s m
ake
th
eir
bu
sin
ess
pla
ns
for
be
tte
r m
ark
et
acc
ess
Co
op
s m
ain
tain
at
leas
t 2
con
trac
ts
wit
h a
grib
usi
nes
ses
ann
ual
ly
Vege
tabl
e se
eds
prod
uced
by
FGs/
Coop
s ha
ve
high
er m
arke
t val
ue (N
PR 2
0 m
ore/
Kg)
25
PO
sare
tra
ine
d b
ase
d o
n
cap
aci
ty
ass
ess
me
nt
25 P
Osa
re re
gist
ered
as c
oope
rativ
es
HV
AP
ag
rib
iz
wo
rkin
g g
rou
ps
est
ab
lish
ed
Ag
rib
usi
ne
ss-
Sta
te d
ialo
gu
e
take
s p
lace
Po
licie
s a
re
incr
ea
sin
gly
sup
po
rtiv
e t
o
ag
rib
usi
ne
ss
Bet
ter
bu
sin
ess
envi
ron
men
t fo
r
vege
tab
le s
eed
s
sub
-sec
tor
Co
op
s p
rovi
de
rele
van
t se
rvic
es
to m
em
be
rs
Incr
ease
d n
et
inco
me o
f H
Hs
(NPR
30,0
00 D
irect
+
NPR
10,0
00 I
ndir
ect
HH
s)
Scal
e (7
50 d
irec
t H
Hs
(60%
Wom
en)
+ 1
,850
indi
rect
H
Hs
(33%
wom
en)
Cre
ate
250 n
et
additio
nal jo
bs
Inp
ut
Sup
ply
P
rod
uct
ivit
y Im
pro
vem
en
t P
ost
-ha
rve
st &
Qu
alit
y Im
pro
vem
en
t M
ark
et
Inte
llig
en
ce
BE
P
OS
Sup
ply
FGs/
Coop
s ap
ply
seed
pos
t-
harv
est m
anag
emen
t
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
4
5
An
nex
4.3
: R
esu
lts
Ch
ain
of
Gin
ger
Va
lue
Ch
ain
Pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
qu
alit
y im
pro
vem
en
t P
roce
ssin
g a
nd
va
lue
ad
dit
ion
M
ark
et
linka
ge
In
pu
t su
pp
ly
Project interventions Service Market Output Service Market Outcome Impact Enterprise Level Impact Poverty Level
Incr
ea
sed
ne
t in
com
e o
f H
Hs
(ave
rag
e 2
5%
Dir
ect
+ 6
%
Ind
ire
ct)
Cre
ate
45
0 n
et
ad
dit
ion
al j
ob
s
Sca
le (
75
0 D
ire
ct H
Hs
+ 2
05
0 I
nd
. H
Hs)
Su
pp
ort
co
op
era
tive
s
an
d g
rou
ps
in S
aly
an
fo
r
com
me
rcia
l pro
du
ctio
n
an
d s
up
ply
of
see
d
rhiz
om
e
75
0 f
arm
ers
use
hig
h
yie
ldin
g f
lesh
y g
ing
er
vari
eti
es
for
the
ir g
ing
er
pro
du
ctio
n
Su
pp
ort
ag
rib
usi
ne
ss-s
tate
dia
log
ue
fo
r B
EE
(PFA
, Q
ua
ran
tin
e)
PO
S
Co
op
era
tive
s in
Sa
lya
n a
re c
ap
ab
le t
o
pro
du
ce a
nd
su
pp
ly
he
alt
hy
see
d r
hiz
om
e
6 c
oo
ps
are
tra
ine
d o
n
po
st-h
arv
est
ha
nd
ling
of
fre
sh g
ing
ers
, a
nd
3
colle
ctio
n c
en
tre
s o
f 2
0
MT
ca
pa
city
are
con
stru
cte
d
Hig
h y
ield
ing
fle
shy
gin
ge
r va
rie
tie
s
ava
ilab
le in
th
e m
ark
et
At
lea
st 2
5 C
om
mu
nit
y
Gin
ge
r T
ech
nic
ian
s (C
GT
s)
are
tra
ine
d,
an
d m
ob
ilize
d
GR
P e
sta
blis
he
s a
t
lea
st 3
de
mo
nst
rati
on
plo
ts
(on
e in
ea
ch d
istr
ict)
CG
Ts
tra
in 7
50
fa
rme
rs o
n
imp
rove
d s
oil
ma
na
ge
me
nt,
cro
p
hu
sba
nd
ry,
an
d p
ost
-
ha
rve
st p
ract
ice
s
At
lea
st 5
,20
0 M
T
gin
ge
rs a
re w
ash
ed
at
the
wa
shin
g c
en
tre
Ag
rib
usi
ne
sse
s
mo
nit
or
pro
du
ctio
n
site
s a
nd
inte
ract
wit
h p
rod
uce
rs/
gro
up
s/co
op
s
Co
op
era
tive
s h
ave
bu
lk s
up
ply
co
ntr
act
s
wit
h a
t le
ast
3
ag
rib
usi
ne
sse
s
25
Pro
du
cer
org
an
isa
tio
ns
are
tra
ine
d a
nd
reg
iste
red
as
coo
pe
rati
ves
Ag
rib
usi
ne
ss-
sta
te
dia
log
ue
cre
ate
s
con
dit
ion
s fo
r
acc
red
ita
tio
n o
f
qu
ara
nti
ne
an
d P
FA
faci
litie
s
Ag
rib
usi
ne
ss-
sta
te
dia
log
ue
cre
ate
con
du
cive
en
viro
nm
en
t fo
r cr
oss
-
bo
rde
r g
ing
er
tra
de
Wa
she
d g
ing
er
fetc
he
s a
t le
ast
NP
R
5/K
g a
dd
itio
na
l pri
ce
Gin
ge
r e
xpo
rt t
hro
ug
h
mid
-we
ste
rn r
eg
ion
incr
ea
sed
at
lea
st b
y
20
% a
nn
ua
lly
Pa
rtic
ipa
tin
g p
rod
uce
rs
rep
ort
incr
em
en
t in
fa
rm g
ate
pri
ce b
y a
t le
ast
NP
R 3
/kg
Co
op
s p
rovi
de
serv
ice
s o
n a
me
mb
ers
hip
fe
e a
nd
serv
ice
fe
e b
asi
s
Gro
up
s/co
op
era
tive
s su
pp
ly
at
lea
st 1
0 M
T o
f fi
ne
dri
ed
gin
ge
r p
er
yea
r
Pa
rtic
ipa
tin
g
gro
up
s/co
op
era
tive
s re
po
rt a
t
lea
st 2
0%
pri
ce in
cre
me
nt
for
fin
e q
ua
lity
dry
gin
ge
r
Pa
rtic
ipa
tin
g p
rod
uce
rs
sup
ply
5,2
00
MT
of
gin
ge
rs t
o
coo
pe
rati
ves
At
lea
st 1
gin
ge
r
wa
shin
g
cen
ter
est
ab
lish
ed
3 C
oo
ps
are
tra
ine
d o
n
pri
ma
ry
pro
cess
ing
&
oth
er
valu
e
ad
dit
ion
Qu
alit
y st
an
da
rds
is a
pp
lied
in
pro
du
ctio
n
pro
cess
DC
CIs
mo
nit
or
ma
rke
t d
em
an
d
an
d t
ren
ds
& r
eg
ula
r u
pd
ate
ma
rke
t in
form
ati
on
fo
r
pro
du
cers
/Co
op
s
Ag
rib
usi
ne
sse
s a
nd
coo
pe
rati
ves
de
velo
p
the
ir o
wn
bu
sin
ess
/act
ion
pla
ns
3 D
CC
Is a
re
tra
ine
d o
n
ma
kt in
fo
colle
ctio
n &
up
da
te
En
ab
ling
en
viro
nm
en
t
Ca
pa
cita
te g
rou
ps,
coo
pe
rati
ves
an
d
farm
ers
fo
r p
rod
uct
ion
an
d p
rod
uct
ivit
y
imp
rove
me
nt
&
mo
nit
or
on
imp
lem
en
tati
on
Bu
ild c
ap
aci
ty o
f &
pro
vid
e s
up
po
rt t
o
coo
pe
rati
ves
for
eff
ect
ive
po
st-h
arv
est
ha
nd
ling
an
d p
rod
uct
ag
gre
ga
tio
n a
nd
mo
nit
or
on
imp
lem
en
tati
on
Ca
pa
cita
te
coo
pe
rati
ves
for
pri
ma
ry p
roce
ssin
g &
oth
er
valu
e a
dd
itio
ns
an
d m
on
ito
r o
n
imp
lem
en
tati
on
Su
pp
ort
DC
CIs
on
ma
rke
t in
form
ati
on
syst
em
str
en
gth
en
ing
Faci
lita
te b
uy-
ba
cks,
&
con
tra
ct f
arm
ing
Pro
du
cer
org
an
isa
tio
n
stre
ng
the
nin
g a
nd
mo
bili
zati
on
Faci
lita
te a
nd
sup
po
rt p
riva
te
sect
or
inve
stm
en
t in
gin
ge
r w
ash
ing
faci
litie
s
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
46 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
Annex 5: Input support to producer groups/cooperatives
Annex 5A: Details of the Inputs Support to groups in Dailekh District
S.N. Name of Inputs Units Volume Remarks
1 Fourseason Bean Seeds Kg 17.5
2 Cauliflower Seeds Grams 800
3 Cabbage seeds Grams 850
4 Pea Seeds Kg 55
5 Tomato seeds Grams 220
6 Radish seeds Kg 15
7 Carrot seeds Kg 1.5
8 Broad Leaf Mustard seeds Kg 0.5
9 Bitter Gourd Seeds Grams 300
10 Cucumber seeds Grams 100
11 Lady's finger seeds Kg 3
Annex 5B: Details of Inputs support to groups in Surkhet District
S.N Name of Inputs Units Volume Remarks
1 Plastic Sheets (Tunnel House for tomato farming) Pieces 26
2 Miraculan (100ml botle) Bottle 85
3 Vegimex (30 ml bottle) Bottle 85
4 Bavistin(100gpacket) Packet 3
5 Dithane M-45 Kg 1.5
6 Sprayer Tank 9 Lt. Pieces 11
7 Tomato Seeds Grams 90
8 Asparagus Bean Seeds Kg 25
9 Cucumber seeds Grams 1500
10 Bitter Guard seeds Grams 740
11 Bottle Guard seeds Grams 500
12 Fourseason bean Kg 12
13 Cauliflower Seeds Grams 200
14 Cabbage Seeds Grams 200
15 Watering Can Pieces 6
Annex 5C: Detail of Inputs Support to groups in Jumla District
S.N. Name of Inputs Units Volume Remarks
1 Plastic Sprayer Tank (16lt.) Pieces 6
2 Coppersulphate Kg 90
3 Lime Kg 180
4 Servo Oil Ltrs 40
5 Secateur Pieces 15
6 Pruning saw Pieces 15
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
4
7
An
nex
6:
Rev
ised
Lo
gfr
am
e o
f th
e p
roje
ct
Na
rra
tive
Su
mm
ary
V
eri
fiab
le I
nd
ica
tors
M
ean
s o
f V
eri
fic
ati
on
A
ss
um
pti
on
s/R
isk
s
Pro
ject
Go
al
Th
e o
ve
rall
go
al is
th
e
red
uctio
n o
f p
ove
rty a
nd
vu
lne
rab
ility
of
wo
me
n a
nd
me
n in
hill
an
d m
ou
nta
in a
rea
s
of
the
Mid
-We
ste
rn
De
ve
lop
me
nt
Re
gio
n
1.
No
of
hh
s w
ith
im
pro
ve
me
nt
in h
ou
se
ho
ld a
sse
ts o
wn
ers
hip
in
de
x
[RIM
S in
dic
ato
r]
2.
% r
ed
uctio
n in
pre
va
len
ce
of
ch
ild m
aln
utr
itio
n (
we
igh
t fo
r a
ge
)
[RIM
S in
dic
ato
r]
3.
Imp
rove
d s
ocia
l in
dic
ato
rs,
inclu
din
g lite
racy r
ate
, b
y g
en
de
r a
nd
en
rolm
en
t in
pri
ma
ry e
du
ca
tio
n f
or
bo
th g
irls
an
d b
oys [
RIM
S
ind
ica
tor]
4.
Nu
mb
er
of
HH
s r
ep
ort
ing
im
pro
ve
d f
oo
d s
ecu
rity
[R
IMS
in
dic
ato
r]
5.
No
. o
f in
div
idu
als
re
ce
ivin
g p
roje
ct
se
rvic
es (
60
% w
om
en
& a
t
lea
st
25
% D
alit
s,
Ja
na
jatis a
nd
oth
er
min
ori
tie
s b
en
efit)
(1-5
) R
IMS
Im
pa
ct
Asse
ssm
en
ts
(Ba
se
line
, M
id-t
erm
an
d C
om
ple
tio
n)
(1,3
,4)
Ou
tco
me
Su
rve
ys in
clu
din
g
Ho
use
ho
ld I
nco
me
an
d E
xp
en
ditu
re
Su
rve
ys
(3)
Na
tio
na
l N
utr
itio
na
l S
urv
eys
(3)
Na
tio
na
l P
ove
rty a
sse
ssm
en
ts
Ne
pa
l h
as a
sta
ble
so
cia
l a
nd
econ
om
ic
clim
ate
th
at
is c
on
du
civ
e t
o v
alu
e c
ha
in
de
ve
lop
me
nt
La
rge
r p
olic
y a
nd
in
stitu
tio
na
l e
nvir
on
me
nt
rem
ain
s f
avo
rab
le
Pro
ject
Pu
rpo
se
Ru
ral p
oo
r, e
sp
ecia
lly w
om
en
an
d m
arg
ina
l g
rou
ps,
are
inte
gra
ted
in
hig
h v
alu
e
ag
ricu
ltu
re a
nd
NT
FP
/MA
P
va
lue
ch
ain
s a
nd
ma
rke
ts a
nd
ha
ve
im
pro
ve
d in
co
me
,
em
plo
ym
en
t o
pp
ort
un
itie
s a
nd
ab
ility
to
re
sp
on
d t
o m
ark
et
de
ma
nd
an
d o
pp
ort
un
itie
s
ba
se
d o
n m
ark
etin
g
ag
ree
me
nts
with
pri
va
te
ag
rib
usin
ess
1.
% a
nd
13
,50
0 o
f p
rod
uce
rs in
th
e p
roje
ct
are
a r
ep
ort
ing
in
cre
ase
d
inco
me
s b
y N
Rs.
30
,00
0 a
t th
e e
nd
of
pro
ject
an
nu
ally
(ta
rge
t 1
3
50
0 H
Hs o
r 8
1,0
00
dir
ect
be
ne
ficia
rie
s)
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
. (C
OS
OP
in
dic
ato
r)
2.
Ch
an
ge
in
% a
nd
vo
lum
e o
f su
rplu
s a
gri
cu
ltu
ral p
rod
uctio
n a
nd
NT
FP
/MA
Ps m
ark
ete
d p
rofita
bly
by p
art
icip
atin
g p
rod
uce
rs a
nd
tra
de
rs d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
(1)
Pro
ject
ba
se
line
, M
id-t
erm
an
d
imp
act
su
rve
ys
(1-2
) A
nn
ua
l O
utc
om
e le
ve
l
asse
ssm
en
ts
(2)
Go
ve
rnm
en
t a
nd
FN
CC
I sta
tistics
at
dis
tric
t, r
eg
ion
al a
nd
na
tio
na
l le
ve
l
(1-2
) V
alu
e C
ha
in B
ase
line
an
d
co
mp
letio
n A
ssessm
en
ts
De
ma
nd
fo
r h
igh
va
lue
co
mm
od
itie
s is
su
ffic
ien
t to
re
aliz
e t
he
pro
jecte
d
de
ve
lop
me
nt
of
pro
-po
or
va
lue
ch
ain
s a
nd
the
su
bse
qu
en
t p
rod
uctive
an
d p
rofita
ble
pa
rtn
ers
hip
s
Inte
rna
l a
nd
exte
rna
l m
ark
et
co
nd
itio
ns a
re
co
nd
uciv
e t
o p
art
icip
atin
g in
ma
rke
tin
g
hig
h v
alu
e c
om
mo
ditie
s t
ha
t a
re a
va
ilab
le
in t
he
pro
ject
are
a
Co
ntin
ue
d c
om
mitm
en
t o
f G
ove
rnm
en
t o
f
Ne
pa
l to
fa
cili
tate
co
mm
erc
ializ
atio
n o
f
ag
ricu
ltu
re t
hro
ug
h m
ark
et
led
ap
pro
ach
es
invo
lvin
g p
riva
te s
ecto
r
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
48
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Pro
ject
Ou
tco
me
s a
nd
Ou
tpu
ts
1.
Co
mp
on
en
t 1
: P
ro-p
oo
r
Va
lue
Ch
ain
De
ve
lop
me
nt
Ob
jec
tive
: T
o f
acili
tate
mu
tua
lly b
en
eficia
l a
nd
pro
fita
ble
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
ma
rke
tin
g a
rra
ng
em
en
ts
be
twe
en
po
or
an
d m
arg
ina
l
pro
du
ce
rs o
f h
igh
va
lue
co
mm
od
itie
s a
nd
ag
ri-
bu
sin
esse
s
1. A
t le
ast
X%
of pro
ject
benefic
iaries
report
impro
ved term
s of tr
ade a
fter
two
ye
ars
(in
te
rm o
f p
rice
, p
aym
en
t tim
ing
, se
rvic
e p
rovi
de
d)
dis
agg
rega
ted
by
ge
nde
r, c
ast
e/e
thn
icity
, p
ove
rty
and
va
lue
cha
in.
2. 7
5%
of in
volv
ed
ag
ribu
sin
ess
ind
ica
tes
exp
ect
atio
n o
f co
ntin
ua
tion
of
ma
rke
t a
rra
ng
em
en
t a
fte
r p
roje
ct d
isag
gre
ga
ted
by
valu
e c
ha
in.
3. V
alu
e o
f tr
ad
ed
go
od
s (s
ale
s) h
ave
incr
ea
sed
of
an
equ
iva
len
t o
f 2
5%
ove
r a
3 y
ea
r pe
riod
(va
lue
at fa
rm g
ate
) d
isa
gg
rega
ted
by
valu
e c
ha
in.
4. N
o. of fu
nct
ionin
g in
put su
pp
liers
an
d s
erv
ice
pro
vid
ers
(L
RP
s, a
gro
-ve
ts,
coo
pe
rativ
es)
in e
ach
ro
ad
co
rrid
or
and
/or
dis
tric
t (N
o. o
f H
Hs
cove
rag
e a
nd
volu
me
)
5. N
o. o
f p
rod
uce
rs r
ep
ort
ing
incr
ea
sed
use
of q
ua
lity
inpu
ts a
nd
se
rvic
es
dis
agg
reg
ate
d b
y ge
nd
er,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity, p
ove
rty
an
d va
lue
ch
ain
6. O
ver
50
0 v
alu
e c
ha
in g
roup
s a
ccess
te
chn
ical a
dvi
sory
se
rvic
es
faci
lita
ted
by
the
pro
ject
[R
IMS
ind
ica
tor]
7. N
o. of tr
aders
, co
opera
tives
and b
usi
ne
sse
s re
po
rtin
g im
pro
ved
se
rvic
e
de
live
ry b
y C
CIs
an
d A
EC
(Q
ua
lity
an
d v
alu
e)
in e
ach
va
lue
cha
in.
(1 &
2)
Pro
ject
ba
se
line
an
d im
pa
ct
su
rve
ys
(4)
Pro
ject
Ou
tco
me
Asse
ssm
en
ts
(1-5
) V
alu
e C
ha
in a
sse
ssm
en
t a
nd
an
nu
al o
utc
om
e a
sse
ssm
en
t
(1
-7)
Pro
ject
pro
gre
ss r
ep
ort
s
(6)
M&
E s
yste
m (
da
ta c
olle
ctio
n
form
at)
(7)
Ca
pa
city a
sse
ssm
en
t o
f D
CC
Is
Ag
rib
usin
esse
s,
tra
de
rs a
nd
ag
ro-
pro
ce
sso
rs e
xp
an
d a
ctivitie
s in
a m
an
ne
r
tha
t b
en
efits
th
e p
roje
ct’s p
oo
r p
rod
uce
rs
Ag
rib
usin
esse
s a
re a
nd
co
ntin
ue
to
be
inte
reste
d in
de
ve
lop
ing
an
d e
nte
rin
g in
to
co
ntr
acts
with
po
or
pro
du
ce
rs f
rom
Mid
-
We
ste
rn R
eg
ion
Ou
tpu
t 1.1
Co
ntr
actu
al
arr
an
ge
me
nts
be
twe
en
pro
du
ce
rs g
rou
ps a
nd
ag
rib
usin
esse
s fu
nctio
nin
g
eff
ective
ly,
su
sta
ina
bly
an
d
be
ne
fitin
g b
oth
pa
rtie
s in
ab
ou
t
18
va
lue
ch
ain
s
1.
No
. o
f g
rou
ps/c
oo
pe
rative
s h
avin
g e
sta
blis
he
d m
ark
et
arr
an
ge
me
nt
(in
co
rpo
ratin
g C
OS
OP
in
dic
ato
r)
2.
No
. o
f co
mm
erc
ial lin
ka
ge
s a
nd
pa
rtn
ers
hip
s b
etw
ee
n f
arm
ers
,
inp
uts
su
pp
liers
an
d d
ow
nstr
ea
m m
ark
et
(CO
SO
P in
dic
ato
r) in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
(1)
An
nu
al O
utc
om
e A
sse
ssm
en
t
(1)
Ba
se
line
an
d c
om
ple
tio
n V
alu
e
Ch
ain
Stu
die
s
(1-2
) M
&E
syste
m (
da
ta c
olle
ctio
n
form
at)
(1
-2)
Pro
ject
pro
gre
ss r
ep
ort
s a
nd
AE
C a
nn
ua
l re
po
rts
Th
ere
is s
uff
icie
nt
inte
rest
in h
igh
va
lue
co
mm
od
itie
s s
ourc
ed
fro
m t
he
pro
ject
are
a
by a
gri
bu
sin
esse
s
Pa
rtn
ers
hip
s d
eve
lop
ed
with
ag
rib
usin
esse
s a
re v
iab
le a
nd
su
sta
ina
ble
in t
he
lo
ng
te
rm w
ith
ou
t co
ntin
ue
d p
roje
ct
su
pp
ort
Ou
tpu
t 1.2
Str
en
gth
en
ed
institu
tio
na
l ca
pacity f
or
de
live
ry a
nd
fa
cili
tatio
n o
f
ma
rke
t o
pp
ort
un
itie
s,
info
rma
tio
n a
nd
su
pp
ort
se
rvic
es
1.
Nu
mb
er
of
AE
C s
taff
assu
min
g v
alu
e c
ha
in f
acili
tatio
n
resp
on
sib
ilities.
2.
No
. o
f p
rod
uce
r g
rou
ps a
nd
co
op
era
tive
s in
cre
ase
d a
cce
ss in
ma
rke
t in
form
atio
n.
3.
No
. o
f m
ark
et
arr
an
ge
me
nt
be
twe
en
pro
du
ce
r g
rou
ps a
nd
tra
de
rs
facili
tate
d b
y A
EC
in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
4.
No
. o
f a
pp
rove
d b
usin
ess p
rop
osa
ls f
acili
tate
d b
y A
EC
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by v
alu
e c
ha
in.
(1
-6)
M&
E s
yste
m (
da
ta c
olle
ctio
n
form
at)
, A
EC
an
nu
al re
po
rts
(7
) C
ap
acity a
sse
ssm
en
t re
po
rt o
f
DC
CIs
AE
C c
on
tin
ue
s t
o f
un
ctio
n a
s a
n
org
an
iza
tio
n t
o p
rom
ote
ag
rib
usin
ess
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
4
9
5.
No
. o
f m
ark
et
arr
an
ge
me
nt
be
twe
en
pro
du
ce
r g
rou
ps a
nd
tra
de
rs
facili
tate
d b
y D
CC
Is in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
6.
No
. o
f a
pp
rove
d b
usin
ess p
rop
osa
ls f
acili
tate
d b
y D
CC
Is
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by v
alu
e c
ha
in.
7.
Institu
tio
na
l ca
pa
city e
nh
an
ce
me
nt
of
10
DC
CIs
Ou
tpu
t 1.3
Wo
me
n,
da
lits,
jan
aja
tis a
nd o
ther
poor
and
vu
lne
rab
le g
rou
ps w
ell
rep
rese
nte
d,
active
ly in
vo
lve
d
an
d b
en
efitin
g f
rom
pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n in
pro
ject
va
lue
ch
ain
s
1.
60
% w
om
en
pa
rtic
ipa
te a
nd
be
ne
fit
fro
m t
he
pro
ject
(fo
cu
s o
n t
he
ne
w g
rou
ps)
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by c
aste
/eth
nic
ity.
2.
At
lea
st
25
% D
alit
s,
Ja
na
jatis a
nd
oth
er
min
ori
tie
s p
art
icip
ate
an
d
be
ne
fit
fro
m t
he
pro
ject
(1 a
nd
2)
M&
E s
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
at)
an
d a
nn
ua
l
ou
tco
me
asse
ssm
en
t
Go
ve
rnm
en
t p
olic
ies a
nd
le
gis
latio
n a
re
su
pp
ort
ive
of
wo
me
n a
nd
min
ori
ty g
rou
ps
Co
mp
on
en
t 2:
In
clu
sio
n a
nd
Su
pp
ort
fo
r V
alu
e C
hain
Init
iati
ve
s
Ob
jec
tive
: S
ma
ll p
oo
r fa
rme
rs
an
d o
the
r ru
ral p
rod
uce
rs
be
ne
fit
fro
m s
usta
ina
ble
incre
ase
s in
vo
lum
e a
nd
va
lue
of
pro
du
ctio
n a
s a
re
su
lt o
f
imp
rove
d p
rod
uctio
n/c
olle
ctio
n,
va
lue
ad
ditio
n a
nd
sa
les o
f
hig
h v
alu
e n
ich
e m
ark
et
pro
du
cts
an
d s
tre
ng
the
ne
d
loca
l ca
pa
city f
or
ma
rke
t d
rive
n
initia
tives
1.
75
% o
f p
rod
uce
r o
rga
niz
atio
ns s
up
po
rte
d o
pe
ratin
g p
rofita
bili
ty a
t
the
en
d o
f th
e p
roje
ct.
2.
No
. o
f H
Hs r
ep
ort
ing
in
cre
ase
in
pro
du
ctivity in
hig
h v
alu
e
ag
ricu
ltu
ral p
rod
ucts
by a
t le
ast
10
% d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
3.
To
tal in
cre
ase
in
pro
du
ctio
n o
f se
lecte
d h
igh
va
lue
ag
ricu
ltu
ral
pro
du
cts
of
at
lea
st
X%
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
4.
Ave
rag
e H
Hs in
cre
ase
in
pro
du
ctio
n o
f se
lecte
d h
igh
va
lue
ag
ricu
ltu
ral p
rod
ucts
by a
t le
ast
X%
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
5.
No
. o
f H
Hs r
ea
lizin
g incre
ase
in
ne
t re
turn
to
HH
s la
bo
r fr
om
hig
h
va
lue
ag
ricu
ltu
ral p
rod
ucts
by a
t le
ast
10
% d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y
ge
nd
er,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
6.
80
% o
f th
e in
fra
str
uctu
re a
nd
eq
uip
me
nt
fin
an
ce
d b
y t
he
Va
lue
Ch
ain
Fu
nd
is f
un
ctio
nin
g a
nd
ap
pro
pri
ate
ly m
ain
tain
ed
at
the
en
d o
f
the
pro
ject
7.
Tw
o-t
hir
ds o
f p
rod
uce
rs w
ho
ha
s r
ece
ive
d t
rain
ing
ad
op
t a
t le
ast
ha
lf o
f th
e t
ech
no
log
y c
om
po
ne
nt
the
y r
ece
ive
d t
rain
ing
by g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
[R
IMS
in
dic
ato
r].
(1-5
) P
roje
ct
ba
se
line
an
d im
pa
ct
su
rve
ys
(1-7
) A
nn
ua
l O
utc
om
e A
sse
ssm
en
ts
an
d v
alu
e c
ha
in a
sse
ssm
en
t
(1
-7)
Qu
alit
ative
po
st-
inte
rve
ntio
n
asse
ssm
en
ts (
case
stu
die
s),
Sp
ecia
l
Stu
die
s/
asse
ssm
en
ts
(1
-7)
Pro
ject
pro
gre
ss r
ep
ort
s
Th
e t
erm
s o
f tr
ad
e f
or
pro
du
ce
rs o
f
ag
ricu
ltu
ral, N
TF
P/M
AP
s c
om
mo
ditie
s
rem
ain
fa
vo
rab
le a
nd
in
cre
ase
th
eir
retu
rns f
rom
hig
h v
alu
e p
rod
ucts
Ma
rke
tin
g a
nd
va
lue
ad
ditio
n a
ctivitie
s
thro
ug
h f
arm
er
org
an
iza
tio
ns r
esu
lt in
hig
he
r p
rice
s f
or
pro
du
ce
rs a
nd
/or
sh
are
d
pro
fits
fo
r m
em
be
rs
Pro
du
ce
rs o
rga
niz
atio
ns a
re a
ble
to
ca
ptu
re a
fa
ir p
ort
ion
of
the
pri
ce
in
cre
ase
s
resu
ltin
g f
rom
th
e v
alu
e c
ha
ins
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
50
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Ou
tpu
t 2.1
Su
b-c
om
po
nen
t
2A
Gro
up
Fo
rma
tio
n a
nd
Str
en
gth
en
ing
:
Sm
all
sca
le p
rod
uce
rs
org
an
ize
d in
gro
up
s,
with
a
hig
h p
rop
ort
ion
of
wo
me
n a
nd
vu
lne
rab
le g
rou
ps,
are
be
tte
r
ab
le t
o r
esp
on
d t
o m
ark
et
de
ma
nd
an
d o
pp
ort
un
itie
s
1.
No
. o
f g
rou
ps/c
oo
pe
rative
s p
racticin
g c
olle
ctive
ma
rke
tin
g
inclu
din
g v
olu
me a
nd
pro
du
ct
mix
in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
2.
No
. o
f g
rou
ps/c
oo
pe
rative
s r
ep
ort
ing
in
cre
ase
ma
rke
t lin
ka
ge
in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
(n
o.
of
bu
ye
rs/t
erm
of
tra
de
)
3.
No
. o
f g
rou
ps a
nd
co
op
era
tive
s h
avin
g/m
an
ag
ing
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
po
st
ha
rve
st
facili
tie
s a
nd
eq
uip
me
nts
(in
clu
din
g in
sta
llatio
n
ca
pa
city)
in e
ach
va
lue
ch
ain
.
4.
No
. o
f p
eo
ple
tra
ine
d in
po
st
pro
du
ctio
n,
pro
ce
ssin
g a
nd
ma
rke
tin
g b
y g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
[R
IMS
ind
ica
tor]
.
5.
Institu
tio
na
l ca
pa
city e
nh
an
ce
me
nt
of
gro
up
s/c
oo
pe
rative
s.
(1-4
) A
nn
ua
l O
utc
om
e A
sse
ssm
en
t
an
d v
alu
e c
ha
in a
sse
ssm
en
t
(1-4
) P
roje
ct
M&
E S
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
ats
, A
WP
B R
ep
ort
ing
)
(5)
Ca
pa
city a
sse
ssm
en
t re
po
rt o
f
Gro
up
s a
nd
co
op
era
tive
s.
Fa
rme
rs g
rou
ps id
en
tifie
d a
nd
se
lecte
d a
re
will
ing
to
pa
rtic
ipa
te in
pro
ject
activitie
s.
Ou
tpu
t 2.2
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t
2B
So
cia
l a
nd
Ge
nd
er
Inclu
sio
n:
Hig
h p
ort
ion
of
risk a
dve
rse
pe
rso
ns/h
ou
se
ho
lds a
nd
lan
dle
ss in
pro
ject
co
mm
un
itie
s p
art
icip
ate
in
th
e
pro
ject
1.
No
. o
f p
oo
r H
Hs p
art
icip
atin
g in
th
e p
roje
ct
(pro
po
rtio
na
lly t
o t
he
ir
pre
se
nce
in
th
e p
roje
ct
reg
ion
) d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
2.
Pe
op
le a
tte
nd
ing
fu
nctio
na
l lit
era
cy a
nd
nu
me
racy c
lasse
s
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
an
d p
ove
rty (
targ
et
of
at
lea
st
70
0 p
art
icip
an
ts b
y p
roje
ct
en
d)
[RIM
S in
dic
ato
r].
3.
No
. o
f w
om
en
in
le
ad
ers
hip
po
sitio
n in
pro
du
ce
r/u
se
r/m
ark
etin
g/t
rad
ing
gro
up
s a
nd
co
op
era
tive
s b
y
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity a
nd
po
ve
rty.
(1
-3)
Pro
ject
M&
E S
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
ats
, A
WP
B R
ep
ort
ing
)
(1
-3)
Pro
ject
pro
gre
ss a
nd
eva
lua
tio
n r
ep
ort
s
(2)
Fu
nctio
na
l L
ite
racy a
nd
nu
me
racy
tra
inin
g a
sse
ssm
en
t
report
No
sp
ecific
ris
ks o
r a
ssu
mp
tio
ns
Assu
me
s t
ha
t su
ffic
ien
t jo
bs c
an
be
cre
ate
d in
pro
ject-
su
pp
ort
ed
va
lue
ch
ain
institu
tio
ns t
o a
bso
rb t
he
nu
mb
ers
of
pe
op
le n
ee
din
g e
mp
loym
en
t
Ou
tpu
t 2.3
S
ub
-co
mp
on
en
t
2C
Pro
du
cti
on
/ P
ost
Harv
es
t
Su
pp
ort
:
Incre
me
nta
l vo
lum
es o
f
ag
ricu
ltu
ral co
mm
od
itie
s a
nd
NT
FP
s/M
AP
s a
re b
ein
g
pro
du
ce
d in
th
e q
ua
ntitie
s a
nd
qu
alit
ies s
pe
cifie
d in
co
ntr
acts
with
ag
rib
usin
esse
s
1.
No
. o
f p
rod
uce
rs a
nd
tra
de
rs a
cce
ssin
g im
pro
ved
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
pro
ce
ssin
g t
ech
no
log
ies d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity
an
d p
ove
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
2.
X%
re
du
ctio
n in
po
st-
ha
rve
st
loss d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity a
nd
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
3.
60
% o
f 1
3,5
00
hh
s h
as in
cre
ase
d a
cce
ss t
o p
rod
uctive
asse
ts
(in
pu
ts,
pro
ce
ssin
g e
qu
ipm
en
t, t
oo
ls,
tech
nic
al a
ssis
tan
ce
)
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
(1-3
) A
nn
ua
l O
utc
om
e A
sse
ssm
en
t
an
d v
alu
e c
ha
in a
sse
ssm
en
t
(1-2
) C
rop
cycle
asse
ssm
en
t
(1-3
) P
roje
ct
M&
E S
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
ats
, A
WP
B R
ep
ort
ing
)
(1
-3
) P
roje
ct
pro
gre
ss a
nd
eva
lua
tio
n r
ep
ort
s
Assu
me
s t
ha
t p
riva
te s
ecto
r w
ill b
e a
ble
to
ma
ke
ava
ilab
le th
e in
pu
ts n
ee
de
d f
or
the
se
co
mm
od
itie
s
Th
ere
is s
uff
icie
nt
de
ma
nd
fo
r th
e h
igh
va
lue
co
mm
od
itie
s t
ha
t ca
n b
e p
rod
uce
d in
the
pro
ject
are
a
Ou
tpu
t 2.4
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t
2D
Valu
e C
hain
Fu
nd
:
Infr
astr
uctu
re,
eq
uip
me
nt
an
d
ce
rtific
atio
n f
ina
nce
d b
y t
he
Va
lue
Ch
ain
Fu
nd
is
co
ntr
ibu
tin
g t
o t
he
pro
fita
ble
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
ma
rke
tin
g o
f
1.
No
. o
f b
usin
ess p
lan
su
cce
ssfu
lly im
ple
me
nte
d t
hro
ug
h w
ind
ow
1
(50
:50
) a
nd
2 (
85
:15
) [R
IMS
in
dic
ato
r] in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
2.
No
. o
f p
rod
uce
rs a
nd
va
lue
of
pro
du
cts
su
pp
lied
to
in
ve
ste
d
bu
sin
ess d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
3.
No
. o
f p
rod
uce
rs/t
rad
ers
acce
ssin
g I
nfr
astr
uctu
re a
nd
eq
uip
me
nts
facili
tie
s d
isa
gg
reg
ate
d b
y g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
(1)
Bu
sin
ess p
lan
eva
lua
tio
n r
ep
ort
s
an
d s
ub
-pro
ject
co
mp
letio
n r
ep
ort
s.
(1-2
) P
roje
ct
M&
E S
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
ats
, A
WP
B R
ep
ort
ing
)
(1-4
) a
nn
ua
l o
utc
om
e a
sse
ssm
en
t
an
d v
alu
e c
ha
in a
sse
ssm
en
t
Th
ere
is a
ris
k t
ha
t o
wn
ers
hip
co
uld
be
an
issu
e.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
5
1
the
pro
ject’s h
igh
va
lue
co
mm
od
itie
s
Va
lue
Ch
ain
th
rou
gh
va
lue
ch
ain
fu
nd
.
4.
No
. o
f P
rod
uce
rs a
nd
tra
de
rs in
cre
ase
in
sta
lled
ca
pa
city a
nd
utiliz
atio
n o
f e
qu
ipm
en
ts a
nd
in
fra
str
uctu
res b
y g
en
de
r,
ca
ste
/eth
nic
ity a
nd
po
ve
rty in
ea
ch
va
lue
ch
ain
.
Ou
tpu
t 2.5
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t
2E
Dis
tric
t P
art
icip
ati
on
an
d
Sp
ati
al
Inclu
sio
n
Infr
astr
uctu
re p
roje
cts
th
at
imp
rove
acce
ssib
ility
of
rem
ote
co
mm
un
itie
s c
om
ple
ted
an
d
facili
tate
ma
rke
tin
g o
f h
igh
va
lue
co
mm
od
itie
s
1.
No
. o
f in
fra
str
uctu
res/f
acili
tie
s (
cu
lve
rt,
gra
vity r
op
e w
ay,
foo
t
bri
dg
e,
etc
) co
nstr
ucte
d/r
eh
ab
ilita
ted
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by d
istr
ict
(ta
rge
ted
50
nu
mb
ers
) [R
IMS
in
dic
ato
r].
2.
No
. o
f p
rod
uce
rs a
cce
ssin
g s
patia
l in
clu
sio
n in
fra
str
uctu
res
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
3.
Va
lue
of
co
mm
od
ity f
low
ing
th
rou
gh
in
fra
str
uctu
re c
on
str
ucte
d
an
d in
cre
ase
d b
y 1
0%
dis
ag
gre
ga
ted
by g
en
de
r, c
aste
/eth
nic
ity,
po
ve
rty a
nd
va
lue
ch
ain
.
(1-3
) A
nn
ua
l O
utc
om
e A
sse
ssm
en
t
an
d M
&E
syste
m (
da
ta c
olle
ctio
n
form
at)
(3)
ca
se
stu
die
s,
Sp
ecia
l S
tud
ies/
asse
ssm
en
ts a
nd
an
nu
al p
rog
ress
report
s
Ro
ad
ne
two
rk d
eve
lop
me
nt
allo
ws
rea
ch
ing
ou
t re
mo
te c
om
mu
nitie
s
Co
mp
on
en
t 3:
Pro
jec
t
Man
ag
em
en
t
Ou
tpu
t 3.1
Pro
ject
ma
na
ge
me
nt,
ad
vis
ory
an
d
co
ord
ina
tio
n s
yste
ms o
pe
ratin
g
eff
ective
ly
1.
PS
C a
nd
PC
SG
me
etin
gs t
akin
g p
lace
on
qu
art
erl
y b
asis
2.
Ach
ieve
me
nt
of
pro
ject
targ
ets
(A
WP
B p
lan
ne
d v
s.
ach
ieve
d)
3.
Tim
ely
pro
du
ctio
n o
f A
WP
B a
nd
pro
gre
ss r
ep
ort
s
(1-3
) P
roje
ct
eva
lua
tio
n r
ep
ort
s
(1-3
) P
roje
ct
M&
E S
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
ats
, A
WP
B R
ep
ort
ing
)
(1-3
) P
roje
ct
Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
s
(1-3
)Jo
int
Re
vie
w M
issio
n R
ep
ort
s
Th
e m
ain
ris
k r
ela
tes t
o t
he
ab
ility
to
fin
d
an
d k
ee
p in
po
st
qu
alif
ied
go
ve
rnm
en
t
off
ice
rs
Ou
tpu
t 3.2
In
cre
ase
d c
ap
acity
with
in g
ove
rnm
en
t to
gu
ide
va
lue
ch
ain
de
ve
lop
me
nt
1.
No
. o
f su
pp
ort
ive
va
lue
ch
ain
lin
ke
d p
olic
ies a
nd
le
gis
latio
n
2.
No
of
po
licy d
ialo
gu
e e
ve
nts
an
d “
pro
du
cts
” p
rod
uce
d (
i.e
.
wo
rksh
op
s,
po
licy b
rie
fs,
info
rma
tio
n m
ate
ria
ls)
(1
-2)
Pro
ject
M&
E S
yste
m (
da
ta
co
llectio
n f
orm
ats
, A
WP
B R
ep
ort
ing
)
(1-2
) P
roje
ct
Pro
gre
ss R
eport
s
(1-2
)Jo
int
Re
vie
w M
issio
n R
ep
ort
s
Th
ere
co
uld
be
a r
isk in
ach
ievin
g t
his
ou
tpu
t if t
he
cu
rre
nt
hig
h t
urn
ove
r o
f sta
ff
in M
OA
D c
on
tin
ue
s.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
52
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
An
nex
7:
Det
ail
of
ph
ysi
cal
an
d f
inan
cial
pro
gre
ss (
FY
2011/1
2)
Co
mp
on
ent
1: P
ro-P
oo
r V
alu
e C
hai
n D
evel
op
men
t N
ote:
Exp
ense
upt
o 15
JU
LY 2
012
C
onve
rsio
n ra
te
78 N
PR
= 1
US
D
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
A. S
NV
Par
t
A.1
Pro
gra
mm
e B
ud
get
1.1
Co
mp
on
ent
1. P
ro-
Po
or
Val
ue
Ch
ain
D
evel
op
men
t-
Pu
rpo
se:
To
fa
cilit
ate
mu
tual
ly
ben
efic
ial a
nd
p
rofi
tab
le
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
m
arke
tin
g
arra
ng
emen
ts
bet
wee
n p
oo
r an
d
mar
gin
al p
rod
uce
rs
of
hig
h v
alu
e co
mm
od
itie
s an
d
agri
-bu
sin
ess
1. A
t lea
st x
% o
f pro
ject
be
nefic
iaire
s re
port
ed
impr
oved
term
s of
Tra
de
afte
r tw
o ye
ars
2. 7
5% o
f inv
olve
d ag
ribus
ines
s in
dica
tes
expe
ctat
ion
of
cont
inua
tion
of m
arke
t ar
rang
emen
t afte
r pr
ojec
t.
3. V
alue
of t
rade
d go
ods
(sal
es)
have
incr
ease
d of
an
equ
ival
ent o
f 25%
ove
r a
3 ye
ar p
erio
d on
farm
ga
te p
rice.
4. N
o. o
f fun
ctio
ning
inpu
t su
pplie
rs a
nd s
ervi
ce
prov
ider
s (L
RP
s, A
gro-
vets
, coo
pera
tives
) in
ea
ch r
oad
corr
idor
.
5.
No.
of p
rodu
cers
repo
rting
in
crea
sed
use
of q
ualit
y in
puts
and
ser
vice
s.
6. O
ver
500
valu
e ch
ain
grou
ps a
cces
sing
te
chni
cal a
dvis
ory
serv
ices
faci
litat
ed [R
IMS
in
dica
tor]
.
7. N
o. o
f tra
ders
, co
oper
ativ
es a
nd
busi
ness
es r
epor
ting
impr
oved
ser
vice
del
iver
y by
CC
Is a
nd A
EC
.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
5
3
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
1.1
Ou
tpu
t 1.
1.
Co
ntr
actu
al
arra
ng
emen
ts
bet
wee
n p
rod
uce
rs
gro
up
s an
d
agri
bu
sin
esse
s fu
nct
ion
ing
ef
fect
ivel
y,
sust
ain
ably
an
d
ben
efit
ing
bo
th
par
ties
in a
bo
ut
18
valu
e ch
ain
s
1. N
o. o
f gr
oups
/coo
pera
tives
ha
ving
est
ablis
hed
mar
ket
arra
ngem
ent
(inco
rpor
atin
g C
OS
OP
in
dica
tor)
.
2. N
o. o
f com
mer
cial
lin
kage
s an
d pa
rtne
rshi
ps
betw
een
farm
ers/
inpu
ts
supp
liers
and
dow
nstr
eam
m
arke
t (C
OS
OP
in
dica
tor)
.
A
ctiv
ity 1
.1.1
: Val
ue
Cha
in P
riorit
izat
ion
Wor
khop
At l
east
VC
for
proj
ect
inte
rven
tion
prio
ritiz
ed
1
0
21
6
0
A
ctiv
ity 1
.1.2
: V
alue
ch
ain
Bas
elin
e S
tudi
es
10 b
asel
ine
stud
ies
of
pote
ntia
l val
ue c
hain
in
clud
ing
appl
e, v
eget
able
se
ed &
Gin
ger
will
be
done
to id
entif
y pr
oduc
tion
pote
ntia
l /
pock
ets
area
s an
d ta
rget
be
nefic
iarie
s
XX
X
S N V
18
10
6
6
204
7,
560.
0
96
.92
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
2419
.8
24
19.8
A
ctiv
ity 1
.1.3
: V
alue
ch
ain
Ana
lysi
s
7 V
alue
cha
in a
naly
sis
will
be
con
duct
ed fo
r va
lue
chai
n m
appi
ng o
f act
ors,
m
arke
t dyn
amic
s,
gove
rnan
ce s
truc
ture
and
fu
nctio
ns a
long
the
chai
n
XX
X
S N V
15
7
8 6
80
3,68
7.0
47.2
7
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
2419
.8
24
19.8
Act
ivity
1.1
.4:
S
take
hold
ers
Con
sulta
tion,
V
alid
atio
n a
nd
Str
ateg
y D
evel
opm
ent
Wor
ksho
ps
2 s
take
hold
ers
cons
ulat
ion
per
valu
e ch
ain
and
7 V
alid
atio
n &
V
C s
trat
egie
s /
inte
rven
tion
wor
ksho
p co
nduc
ted
XX
X
S N V
15
7
8
7
19
3
6,
300.
0
80
.77
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
1694
.8
14
95.0
Act
ivity
1.1
.5:
Agr
ibus
ines
s en
gage
men
t (B
usin
ess
Opp
ortu
nity
W
orks
hop)
6 bu
sine
ss o
ppor
tuni
ty
WS
con
duct
ed to
iden
tify
intr
este
d &
pot
entia
l ag
ribus
ines
s re
late
d in
10
va
lue
chai
n
XX
X
S N V
18
6
6 3
36
864.
0
11
.08
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
647.
5
420.
1
A
ctiv
ity 1
.1.6
: A
grib
usin
ess/
prod
uce
r co
ntra
ct fa
cilit
atio
n
6 co
ntra
ct e
stab
lishe
d be
twee
n A
grib
usin
ess
&
Pro
duce
rs /
colle
ctor
s fo
r se
vera
l val
ue c
hain
.
XX
X
S N V
12
6
1
1
24
86
5.0
11.0
9
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
50.0
50.0
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
54
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
A
ctiv
ity 1
.1.6
: B
2B
linka
ge F
acili
tatio
n
3 B
2B e
vent
s w
ill b
e co
nduc
ted
enha
ncin
g bu
sine
ss
XX
X
S N V
11
3
3
2
29
54
0.0
6.92
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
351.
7
351.
7
To
tal P
rog
ram
Bu
dg
et f
or
Ou
tpu
t 1.
1
566
0 19
,816
25
4
7,
800
0 7,
156
A.2
Pro
cure
men
t B
ud
get
V
ehic
les
(dou
ble
cabi
n)
X
1
1
1
1
4000
0
20
4.0
2.62
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
2871
.2
95
.6
M
otor
cycl
es (
150c
c)
X
2 3
3
3
2
4000
68
4.0
8.77
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
211.
9
211.
9
C
ompu
ters
(la
ptop
)
X
7
7
7
7
7000
60
4.0
7.74
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
560.
0
560.
0
P
rinte
r
X
1
1
1
1
1000
72
.0
0.
92
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
33.6
33.6
C
amer
a
X
3
3
3
3
1500
10
8.0
1.38
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
40.5
40.5
O
vehe
ad p
roje
ctor
pl
us s
cree
n
X
1
1
1
1
2000
14
4.0
1.85
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
48.0
48.0
Not
e: P
rocu
rem
ent o
f one
mor
e m
otor
cycl
e to
be
revi
ewed
by
Join
t Rev
iew
Mis
sion
To
tal o
f P
rog
ram
me
55
500
0 1,
816.
0
23.3
-
-
3,
765.
3
98
9.6
A.3
Op
erat
ion
al C
ost
s &
Mis
cella
neo
us
T
ech
nic
al E
xper
ts
270
1,
382
26
,914
.0
345.
05
39,1
23.4
8
30
,449
.28
S
enio
r T
echn
ical
&
Man
agem
ent E
xper
t (in
tern
atio
nal)
XX
X
S N V
42
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
18
.5
12
44
7
9,20
2.0
11
7.97
III
50
% S
NV+
50
% IF
AD
1564
5.8
10
661.
6
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
5
5
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
In
clus
ive
Bus
ines
s E
xper
t (na
tiona
l)
XX
X
S N V
48
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
12
.5
12
19
7
3,
542.
0
45
.41
III
50%
S
NV
+
50%
IF
AD
4245
.7
40
98.1
G
ES
I Exp
ert
(nat
iona
l)
XX
X
S N V
30
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
10
10
123
3,
542.
0
45.4
1
III
50%
S
NV
+
50%
IF
AD
3396
.0
33
96.0
ID
/OS
Exp
ert
(nat
iona
l)
XX
X
S N V
42
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
16
.5
12
17
2
3,54
2.0
45
.41
III
50%
S
NV
+
50%
IF
AD
5427
.1
40
98.7
V
alue
Cha
in E
xper
t
(nat
iona
l)
XX
X
S N V
66
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
15
12
271
3,
543.
0
45.4
2
III
50%
S
NV
+
50%
IF
AD
5424
.6
40
96.2
P
rodu
cer
Org
anis
atio
n D
evel
opm
ent E
xper
t
XX
X
S N V
42
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
16
.5
12
17
2
3,54
3.0
45
.42
III
50%
S
NV
+
50%
IF
AD
4984
.3
40
98.7
S
NV
Su
pp
ort
Sta
ff
68
99
3.0
12
.7
10
0%
IFA
D
1,47
8.1
1,47
8.1
S
uppo
rt O
ffice
r (A
dmin
/Fin
ance
/logi
sti
c)
XX
X
S N V
54
18
.5
pers
on-
mon
th
18.5
18.
5
43
691.
0
8.86
III
15
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
1142
.5
11
42.5
D
river
XX
X
S N V
72
12
pe
rson
-m
onth
12
12
25.2
302.
0
3.87
III
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
335.
5
335.
5
T
rave
l & D
SA
149
3,
110.
0
39.9
15
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
2,57
2.0
2,11
0.5
T
rave
l and
tr
ansp
orta
tion
XX
X
S N V
270
LS
54.0
1,38
2.0
17
.72
III
15
GoN
+ 85
%
IFA
D
1267
.7
10
98.2
D
SA
X
XX
S N V
27
0
LS
94
.5
1,
728.
0
22.1
5
III
15 G
oN+
85%
IFA
D13
04.4
1012
.3
O
per
atio
n &
M
ain
ten
ance
90
1,
133.
0
14.5
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
508.
2
50
8.2
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
56
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
T
ran
spo
rt
equ
ipm
ent
0
0
V
ehic
les
O&
M
XX
X
S N V
5.5
1
1
1
44
.7
58
6.0
7.
51
III
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
293.
0
293.
0
M
otor
cycl
es O
&M
XX
X
S N V
11.0
2
2
2
5.1
67
.0
0.86
III
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
22.1
22.1
O
ffic
e E
qu
ipm
ent
III
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
0.0
0.
0
E
quip
men
t O &
M
S N V
6
1
year
1
1
40.0
480.
0
6.15
III
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
193.
1
193.
1
S
NV
Man
agem
ent
Su
pp
ort
XX
X
S N V
1 ye
ar
2
1
20
5.3
4,
089.
0
52.4
2
III
15G
oN
+
85%
IF
AD
4716
.6
37
60.6
To
tal o
f O
per
atio
nal
& M
isce
llan
eou
s
1,
894
0 36
,239
46
5
48
,398
38,3
07
To
tal o
f S
NV
on
Ou
tpu
t 1.
1
57,9
60
0 57
,871
74
2
59
,963
46,4
53
B. A
EC
Par
t
B.1
Pro
gra
m B
ud
get
1.2
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2 S
tren
gth
ened
in
stit
uti
on
al
cap
acit
y fo
r d
eliv
ery
and
fac
ilita
tio
n o
f m
arke
t o
pp
ort
un
itie
s,
info
rmat
ion
an
d
sup
po
rt s
ervi
ces
1. N
umbe
r a
nd q
ualit
y of
A
EC
sta
ff as
sum
ing
valu
e ch
ain
faci
litat
ion
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
2. N
o. o
f pro
duce
rs
grou
ps a
nd c
oope
rativ
es
Incr
ease
d ac
cess
in
mar
ket i
nfor
mat
ion.
3. N
o. o
f mar
ket
arra
ngem
ent b
etw
een
Pro
duce
r gr
oups
and
T
rade
rs fa
cilit
ated
by
AE
C.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
5
7
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
4.
No.
of
busi
ness
pr
opos
als
appr
oved
fa
cilit
ated
by
AE
C.
5. N
o. o
f mar
ket
arra
ngem
ent b
etw
een
Pro
duce
r gr
oups
and
T
rade
rs fa
cilit
ated
by
DC
CIs
.
6.
No.
of a
ppro
ved
busi
ness
pro
posa
ls
faci
litat
ed b
y D
CC
Is.
7.
Inst
itutio
nal c
apac
ity
Enh
ance
men
t of 1
0 D
CC
Is.
1.2. 1
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2.1
Cap
acit
y S
tren
gth
enin
g o
f D
CC
IS
A E C
6
1 7 0 0
4200
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.1
O
rient
atio
n, c
apac
ity
asse
ssm
ent o
f DC
CIs
7 D
CC
Is o
rient
ed o
n pr
ojec
t obj
ectiv
e, m
adal
ity
and
stra
tegy
. Als
o ca
paci
ty a
nd s
tatu
s as
sess
ed
X
A E C
6
1 5 0
2
1
300
100
1.3
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
18
4.96
184.
96
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.2
T
rain
ing
of D
CC
Is
Sta
ff
25 D
CC
Is m
embe
r tr
aine
d
on th
e
X
A E C
6
1 1 0 0
1
1
600
100
1.3
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
100.
12
10
0.12
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.3
. S
uppo
rt to
sat
ellit
e un
it of
AE
C (
in e
ach
DC
CIs
of p
roje
ct
area
)
AE
C s
atel
lite
unit
in 7
D
CC
Is w
ere
sppo
rted
for
the
proj
ect
XX
A E C
6
1
5 5 0
1
1
3300
60
0 7.
7 III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
62
0.00
620.
00
To
tal o
f O
utp
ut
1.2.
1:
4200
80
0 10
.26
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
905.
08
90
5.08
1.2. 2
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2.2.
Mar
ket
Info
rmat
ion
M
anag
emen
t an
d
Dis
sem
inat
ion
A E C
6
1 5 0 0
29
82
30
00
Act
ivity
1.2
.2.1
C
ontr
act b
etw
een
DC
CIs
and
AE
C
AE
C w
ould
hav
e m
ade
cont
ract
with
7 D
CC
Is to
go
alo
ng w
ith H
VA
P
X
A E C
6
1 7 0
1
1
420
10
0.1
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
8.49
8.49
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
58
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
Act
ivity
1.2
.2.2
T
rain
ing
for
the
data
co
llect
or
25 P
artic
ipan
ts w
ould
ha
ved
been
trai
ned
on
data
col
lect
ion
met
hodo
logy
X
A E C
6
1 1 0 0
1
1
600
100
1.3
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
135.
96
13
5.96
Act
ivity
1.2
.2.3
. F
low
of p
rice
info
rmat
ion
thro
ugh
web
site
Pric
e of
Hig
h va
lued
co
mm
oditi
es w
ould
be
regu
larly
del
iver
ed
thro
ugh
web
site
X
A E C
6
1 1 3 0
1
1
780
50
0.6
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
71.1
9
71.1
9
Act
ivity
1.2
.2.4
. A
llow
nces
for
Info
rmat
ion
colle
ctio
n
Sev
en p
erso
ns w
ould
ha
ve b
een
invo
lved
in
data
col
lect
ion
( O
ne in
ea
ch D
DC
Is)
X
A E C
6
1
1 0 0
1
1
600
280
3.6
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
252.
00
25
2.00
To
tal
of
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2.2:
24
00
440
5.64
46
7.64
467.
64
1.2. 3
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2.3.
Po
licy
Dia
lou
ges
an
d
resp
on
se
A E C
N A
N
A
2 1 2. 5
1278
A
ctiv
ity 1
.2.3
.1.
For
mat
ion
and
oper
atio
n of
HV
AP
A
grib
usin
ess
wor
king
gr
oup
Cen
tral
Lev
el
Agr
ibus
ines
s W
orki
ng
grou
p w
ould
hav
e be
en
form
ed a
nd u
nder
fu
nctio
ning
X
A E C
N A
N
A
7 5
2
1
300
150
1.9
II
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
31
.40
31
.40
A
ctiv
ity 1
.2.3
.2.
Pol
icy
dial
ouge
s/M
eetin
gs
X
X
A E C
N A
N
A
1 6 2. 5
1
1
975
138
1.8
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
71.4
1
71.4
1
To
tal o
f O
utp
ut
1.2.
3.
1275
28
8 3.
7
10
2.8
10
2.81
1.2. 4
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2.4.
VC
le
arn
ing
an
d b
est
pra
ctic
es
A E C
6
1 1 2 0
85
2
720
A
ctiv
ity 1
.2.4
.1
Tra
inin
g on
VC
25 D
CC
I mem
bers
wou
ld
have
bee
n tr
aine
d on
VC
A
naly
sis
X
A E C
6
1
9 0
1
1
540
90
1.2
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
46.5
1
46.5
1
A
ctiv
ity 1
.2.4
.2.
Doc
umen
tatio
n
Doc
umen
tatio
n w
ould
ha
ve b
een
mad
e on
bes
t le
arni
ng a
nd p
ract
ices
on
VC
X
X
A E C
N A
N
A
3 0
1
1
180
30
0.4
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
0.00
0.00
To
tal
of
Ou
tpu
t 1.
2.4
720
120
1.54
46
.51
46
.51
To
tal
of
B1
85
95
1648
21
.13
15
22.0
4
1522
.04
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
5
9
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
B.2
Pro
cure
men
t
I.B.
I.B. E
quip
men
ts
I.B
.1. M
eans
of
Tra
nspo
rt
M
otor
cycl
e
1 m
otor
cycl
e w
ould
hav
e be
en p
rocu
red
1
2 1
1 8 0
1
1
180
180
2.3
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
179.
90
0.
00
C
amer
a
1
0.00
0.00
I.B
.2. O
ffice
E
quip
men
t
Com
pute
r (L
apto
p)
1 la
ptop
wou
ld h
ave
been
pr
ocur
ed
2
3 1
7 4
3
1
74
74
0.9
III
100
%
IFA
D
net o
f ta
x
116.
00
0.
00
No
te :
Pro
cure
men
t t
o b
e r
evie
wed
by
Join
t R
evie
w M
issi
on
To
tal B
ud
get
fo
r P
rocu
rem
ent
254
254
3.26
29
6
0
B.3
Op
erat
ion
al C
ost
s &
Mis
cella
neo
us
SC
3.1
Sal
arie
s of
PM
U
staf
fs
3.
1.1
Sal
ary
of
VC
D o
ffice
r
A E C
60
12
9 6
12
12
86
90.4
5760
11
52
14.8
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
1,10
6.85
1,
106.
85
3.
1.2
Sal
ary
of
IB o
ffice
r
A E C
60
12
9 6
12
12
86
90.4
5760
11
52
14.8
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
1,15
2.00
1,
152.
00
3.
1.3
Tra
vel a
nd
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
A E C
144
24
1 4. 2
24
24
20
44.8
2044
.8
341
4.4
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
681.
81
60
4.32
3.1.
4 D
SA
A E C
144
24
1 4. 2
24
24
20
44.8
2044
.8
341
4.4
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
119.
25
11
9.25
3.
1.5
Sal
ary
of
AE
C C
entr
al
Coo
rdin
ator
A E C
3 1 1 5
3
3
0
34
5 4.
4 III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
1035
.00
34
5.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
60
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s ('0
00)
B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1 Q 2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total) NPR
Appraisal (Total)
(USD)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
) (D
) (E
) (F
) (F
.a)
(G)
(G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
)
(L)
(L.a
)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
3.
1.6
Sal
ary
of
supp
ort o
ffice
r
A E C
24
4
2 4. 8 5
4
4
674.
5
596.
4 99
1.
3 III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
99.0
0
99.0
0
3.
1.7
AE
C
man
agem
ent C
ost
A E C
N A
0
2548
.9
2934
.18
489
6.3
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
798.
30
48
9.00
3.
1.8
Equ
ipm
ent
O&
M
6
1 5 6. 8
1
1
0.0
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
37.7
6
37.7
6
3.
1.8.
1 T
rans
port
Equ
ipm
ents
6
1
2 1
1
1
128
128
21
0.3
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
3.
1.8.
2 O
ffice
E
quip
men
ts
6
1 3 6
1
1
21
3
213
36
0.5
III
15%
GoN
+
85%
IF
AD
49.7
8
10.8
To
tal o
f O
per
atio
nal
& M
isc
25
034.
8
1948
1 39
76
50.9
7
50
80
39
64
To
tal o
f A
EC
25
035
5878
75
.36
6898
5486
.0
Ou
tpu
t 1.
3 W
om
en,
dal
its,
jan
ajat
is a
nd
o
ther
po
or
and
vu
lner
able
gro
up
s w
ell r
epre
sen
ted
, ac
tive
ly in
volv
ed
and
ben
efit
ing
fro
m
par
tici
pat
ion
in
pro
ject
val
ue
chai
ns
1. 6
0% w
omen
par
ticip
ate
and
bene
fit fr
om th
e pr
ojec
t 2
. At l
east
25%
D
alits
, Jan
ajat
is a
nd o
ther
m
inor
ities
par
ticip
ate
and
bene
fit fr
om th
e pr
ojec
t
A
ctiv
ity 1
.3.1
:
A
ctiv
ity 1
.3.2
:
To
tal o
f O
utp
ut
1.3:
-
-
To
tal o
n C
om
po
nen
t 1:
25
,035
63,
749
81
7.3
66
861
51
939
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
6
1
Co
mp
on
en
t 2
: In
clu
sio
n a
nd
Su
pp
ort
for V
alu
e C
hain
In
itia
tives
Note
: Expense u
pto
15 J
ULY 2
012
Conversio
n r
ate
USD
1 =
78 N
PR
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
C
ompo
nent
2 -
Incl
usio
n an
d
Sup
port
for
Val
ue
Cha
in In
itiat
ives
Pur
pose
: Sm
all
poor
farm
ers
and
othe
r ru
ral
prod
ucer
s be
nefit
from
sus
tain
able
incr
ease
s in
volu
me
and
valu
e
of p
rodu
ctio
n as
a
resu
lt of
impr
oved
prod
uctio
n/co
llect
i
on, v
alue
add
ition
and
sale
s of
hig
h
valu
e ni
che
mar
ket
prod
ucts
and
stre
ngth
ened
loca
l
capa
city
for
mar
ket
driv
en in
itiat
ives
1. 7
5% o
f Pro
duce
r
orga
niza
tions
sup
port
ed a
nd
oper
atin
g pr
ofita
bilit
y at
the
end
of th
e pr
ojec
t.
2.
No.
of H
Hs
repo
rtin
g
incr
ease
in p
rodu
ctiv
ity in
high
val
ue a
gric
ultu
ral
prod
ucts
by
at le
ast 1
0%.
3.
Tot
al in
crea
se in
prod
uctio
n of
sel
ecte
d hi
gh
valu
e ag
ricul
tura
l pro
duct
s of
at le
ast X
%.
4.
Ave
rage
HH
s in
crea
se in
prod
uctio
n of
sel
ecte
d hi
gh
valu
e ag
ricul
tura
l pro
duct
s by
at le
ast X
%.
5.
No.
of H
Hs
real
izin
g
incr
ease
in n
et r
etur
n to
HH
s
labo
r fr
om h
igh
valu
e
agric
ultu
ral p
rodu
cts
by a
t
leas
t 10%
.
6.
80%
of t
he in
fras
truc
ture
and
equi
pmen
t fin
ance
d by
the
Val
ue C
hain
Fun
d is
func
tioni
ng a
nd a
ppro
pria
tely
mai
ntai
ned
at th
e en
d of
the
proj
ect.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
62
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
7.
Tw
o-th
irds
of p
rodu
cers
who
has
rec
eive
d tr
aini
ng
adop
t at l
east
hal
f of t
he
tech
nolo
gy c
ompo
nent
they
rece
ived
trai
ning
.[RIM
S
indi
cato
r].
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t 2.
1: G
rou
p F
orm
atio
n a
nd
Str
eng
then
ing
:
SC
2.1
Sm
all S
cale
pro
du
cers
org
aniz
ed in
gro
up
s, w
ith
a
hih
g p
rop
ort
ion
of
wo
men
an
d
vulb
erab
le g
rou
s,
are
bet
ter
able
to
resp
on
d t
o
mar
ket
dem
and
and
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
1. N
o. o
f gro
ups/
coop
erat
ives
prac
ticin
g co
llect
ive
mar
ketin
g in
clud
ing
volu
me
and
prod
uct m
ix in
eac
h
valu
e ch
ain.
2.
No.
of g
roup
s/co
oper
ativ
es
repo
rtin
g in
crea
se m
arke
t
linka
ge (
no. o
f buy
ers/
term
of
trad
e).
3.
No.
of g
roup
s an
d
coop
erat
ives
hav
ing
/man
agin
g pr
oduc
tion
and
post
har
vest
faci
litie
s an
d
equi
pmen
ts (
incl
udin
g
inst
alla
tion
capa
city
).
4.
No.
of p
eopl
e tr
aine
d in
post
pro
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
mar
ketin
g.[R
IMS
indi
cato
r].
5.
Inst
itutio
nal c
apac
ity
enha
ncem
ent o
f
grou
ps/c
oope
rativ
es.
A
ctiv
ity 2
.1.1
Loca
l N
GO
s
cont
ract
for
field
activ
ities
7
loca
l NG
O
cong
ract
ed
for
soci
al
mob
iliza
tion
&
stre
ngth
enin
g
X
X
1
1
1
1
11
7710
17
000
217.
9III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
223.
70
223.
70
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
6
3
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
Act
ivity
2.1
.12
Nat
iona
l NG
O
cont
ract
for
field
activ
ities
1
Nat
iona
l
NG
O
cong
ract
ed
for
soci
al
mob
iliza
tion
&
stre
ngth
enin
g
X
10
7
0
0
11
107
2200
28.2
III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
58.9
0
58.9
0
Act
ivity
2.1
.3
Gro
up
Mob
iliza
tion
&
Str
engt
heni
ng b
y
Nat
iona
l NG
O
G
roup
form
ed a
nd
mob
ilize
d
X
X
18
3
0
0
1750
0
35
0044
.9III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
Act
ivity
2.1
.4
Gro
up
Mob
iliza
tion
&
Str
engt
heni
ng b
y
Loca
l NG
O
G
roup
form
ed a
nd
mob
ilize
d
X
X
18
3
3
3
4000
800
10.3
III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
To
tal o
f S
ub
-Co
mp
on
ent
2.1
1503
17.0
0.
00.
023
500.
030
1.3
0.0
0.0
282.
6
282.
6
SC
2.2
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t 2.
2: S
oci
al a
nd
Gen
der
Incl
usi
on
H
igh
po
rto
n o
f
risk
ave
rse
per
son
s/h
ou
seh
o
lds
and
lan
dle
ss
in p
roje
ct
com
mu
nit
ies
par
tici
pat
e in
th
e
pro
ject
1. N
o. o
f poo
r H
Hs
part
icip
atin
g in
the
proj
ect
(pro
port
iona
lly to
thei
r
pres
ence
in th
e pr
ojec
t
regi
on).
2.
Peo
ple
atte
ndin
g fu
nctio
nal
liter
acy
and
num
erac
y
clas
ses
disa
ggre
gate
d.
[RIM
S in
dica
tor]
.
3.
No.
of w
omen
in
lead
ersh
ip p
ositi
on in
prod
ucer
/use
r/m
arke
ting/
trad
i
ng g
roup
s an
d co
oper
ativ
es.
(RIM
S In
dica
tor)
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
64
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
A
ctiv
ity 1
.2.1
.1
Tra
inin
g
Pac
kage
Dev
elop
men
t
3
trai
ning
pack
age
deve
lope
d
on s
ocia
l &
gend
er
incl
usio
n
pers
pect
ive
X
X
NA
3
2
2
1500
19.2
III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.2
Ski
lls a
nd
Voc
atio
nal
Tra
inin
g
25
0
part
icip
ants
deve
lope
d
thei
r sk
ills
and
voca
tiona
l
capa
city
X
X
NA
10
0
0
25
0032
.1III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.3
Mon
itorin
g &
Sup
ervi
sion
X
X
X
NA
12
12
12
16
0020
.5III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
737.
00
737.
00
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.4
Fun
ctio
nal
Lite
racy
Tra
inin
g to
wom
en
75
0 w
omen
wou
ld b
e
liter
ate
fucn
tiona
l ly
X
X
NA
30
0
0
13
0016
.7III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.5
Incl
usio
n of
Ris
k A
vers
e
Gro
up
(incl
udin
g
mee
tings
/mon
it
orin
gs)
Ris
k A
vers
e
grou
p
incl
uded
in
the
proj
ect
X
X
NA
7
0
0
700
9.0
III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
To
tal o
f S
ub
-Co
mp
on
ent
2.2
(PM
U P
art)
7600
.00
97.4
473
7.00
73
7.00
SN
V p
art
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.6
GS
I str
ateg
y an
d
tool
kit
deve
lopm
ent
incl
udin
g
Pro
ject
GS
I
srat
egy
and
man
ual
deve
lope
d
thro
ugh
X
X
X
SN
VN
A
LS
LS
14.7
942.
0 12
.1III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0
0
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
6
5
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
cons
ulta
tion
WS
st
akeh
olde
rs
cons
ulta
tion
at v
ario
us
leve
l
Act
ivity
1.2
.1.7
:Ser
vice
pro
vide
r /
HV
AP
Par
tner
s
awar
enes
s tr
aini
ng
& c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
wor
ksho
ps
Ser
vice
prov
ider
/
HV
AP
Par
tner
s
acap
acite
d
on g
ende
r
issu
es, v
alue
chai
n
deve
lopm
ent
and
incl
usiv
e
busi
ness
X
X
S
NV
NA
6
3
3
3
43
.7
1,
002.
0 12
.8III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
900.
24
900.
24
To
tal o
f S
ub
-Co
mp
on
ent
2.2
(SN
V P
art)
58
.40.
00.
01,
944.
024
.9
90
0.2
90
0.2
To
tal o
n S
ub
-Co
mp
on
ent
2.2:
58
.40.
00.
09,
544.
012
2.4
1,63
7.2
1,
637.
2
SC
2.3
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t 2.
3: P
rod
uct
ion
/ Po
st H
arve
st S
up
po
rt
O
utp
ut
2.3
.1 :
Incr
emen
tal
volu
mes
of
agri
cult
ura
l
com
mo
dit
ies
and
NT
FP
s/M
AP
s ar
e
bei
ng
pro
du
ced
in t
he
qu
anti
ties
and
qu
alit
ies
spec
ifie
d in
con
trac
ts w
ith
agri
bu
sin
esse
s
1. N
o. o
f pro
duce
rs a
nd
trad
ers
acce
ssin
g im
prov
ed
prod
uctio
n an
d pr
oces
sing
tech
nolo
gies
.
2. X
% r
educ
tion
in p
ost-
harv
est l
oss.
3.
60%
of 1
3,50
0 hh
s ha
ve
incr
ease
d ac
cess
to
prod
uctiv
e as
sets
(in
puts
,
proc
essi
ng e
quip
men
t, to
ols,
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce)
.
A
ctiv
ity
2.3.
1.1
:
Pro
duct
ion
need
s
asse
ssm
ent a
nd
V
C fa
rmer
s
tech
nica
lly
trai
ned
X
X
72
12
9
9
10
296
2400
30.8
III
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
17.5
17.5
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
66
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
trai
ning
Act
ivity
2.3.
1.
2 C
ontr
acte
d
NG
O c
apac
ity
build
ing
7
Loca
l
NG
Os
and
1
Nat
iona
l
NG
O b
uilt
up
thei
r cp
acity
X
X
72
3
0
0
8463
1200
15.4
II
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
Act
ivity
2.3.
1.3
Pro
duct
ion
/Pos
t
harv
est s
uppo
rt
activ
ities
F
arm
ers
supp
orte
d fo
r
prod
uctio
n
and
post
harv
est
X
X
10
7
3
3
9477
0
14
000
179.
5II
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
590.
459
0.4
Act
ivity
2.3.
1.4
Pro
duct
ion
Inpu
t
Fun
d cr
eatio
n
P
rodu
ctio
n
Inpu
t fun
d
crea
ted
in 7
dist
ricts
X
X
10
7
0
0
2969
5
24
0030
.8IV
10
0 %
IFA
D
Act
ivity
2.3.
1.
5
Dis
tric
t Bas
ed
Far
min
g
Sys
tem
/Foo
d
faci
lity
P
roje
ct
dist
ricts
rece
ived
farm
ing
syst
em a
nd
Foo
d
secu
rity
assi
stan
ce
X
X
X
10
7
0
0
4200
53.8
II
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
A
ctiv
ity2.
3.1.
6 M
onito
ring
&
Eva
luat
ion
6
6
6
7800
200
2.6
II
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
146.
8
146.
8
To
tal o
n S
ub
-Co
mp
on
ent
2.3:
15
1024
00
2440
031
2.82
0575
4.7
75
4.7
SC
2.4
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t 2.
4 :
Val
ue
Ch
ain
Fu
nd
In
fras
tru
ctu
re,
equ
ipm
ent
and
cert
ific
atio
n
fin
ance
d b
y th
e
valu
e ch
ain
fu
nd
1. N
o. o
f bus
ines
s pl
an
succ
essf
ully
impl
emen
ted
thro
ugh
win
dow
1 (
50:5
0)
and
2 (8
5:15
) in
eac
h va
lue
chai
n.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
6
7
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
is
co
ntr
ibu
tin
g t
o
the
pro
fita
ble
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
mar
keti
ng
of
the
pro
ject
's h
igh
valu
e
com
mo
dit
ies
2. N
o. o
f pro
duce
rs a
nd v
alue
of p
rodu
cts
supp
lied
to
inve
sted
bus
ines
s.
3.
No.
of p
rodu
cers
/trad
ers
acce
ssin
g In
fras
truc
ture
and
equi
pmen
ts fa
cilit
ies.
4.
No.
of P
rodu
cers
and
trad
ers
incr
ease
inst
alle
d
capa
city
and
util
izat
ion
of
equi
pmen
ts a
nd
infr
astr
uctu
res.
X
X
Act
ivity
2.4
.2
VC
fund
esta
blis
hmen
t
V
C fu
nd
crea
ted
in 7
dist
ricts
X
X
10
7
1
1
33
8099
10
000
128.
2IV
90 %
IFA
D
+10
%
Ben
efic
iar
ies
To
tal o
n S
ub
-Co
mp
on
ent
2.4
3380
99
10
000
128.
2051
00
0
SC
2.5
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t 2.
5: D
istr
ict
Par
tici
pat
ion
an
d S
pat
ial
Incl
usi
on
In
fras
tru
ctu
re
pro
ject
s th
at
imp
rove
acce
ssib
ility
of
rem
ote
com
mu
nit
ies
com
ple
ted
an
d
faci
litat
e
mar
keti
ng
of
hig
h
valu
e
com
mo
dit
ies
1. N
o. o
f in
fras
truc
ture
/
faci
litie
s (c
ulve
rt, g
ravi
ty r
ope
way
, foo
t brid
ge, e
tc)
cons
truc
ted/
reh
abili
tate
d
[RIM
S in
dica
tor]
.
2.
No.
of p
rodu
cers
acce
ssin
g sp
atia
l inc
lusi
on
infr
astr
uctu
res.
3.
Val
ue o
f com
mod
ity
flow
ing
thro
ugh
infr
astr
uctu
re
cons
truc
ted
and
incr
ease
d by
10%
.
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
68
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
t
ed R
esul
ts
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q
2
Q
3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total)
USD
Proposed
Revision (Total)
Planned
(Annual) In
NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent
(Cumulative) In
NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual)
In NPR' 000
%
(A)
(B)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
) (G
) (G
a)(H
) (I
) (J
) (K
) (L
) (L
.a)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
A
ctiv
ity 2
.5.1
.1
Dis
tric
t Val
ue
Cha
in T
rain
ing
D
istr
ict l
evel
stak
ehol
ders
trai
nned
in
VC
X
X
60
7
0
0
3900
1050
13.5
II
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
Act
ivity
2.5
.1.2
Dis
tric
t lev
el
Ann
ual R
evie
w &
Pla
nnin
g
Wor
ksho
p
F
eed
back
and
inpu
t
rece
ived
from
from
7
dist
rict i
n
proj
ect
plan
ning
and
impl
emen
tati
on
X
X
60
7
7
7
4680
780
10.0
II
15%
GO
N+
85
% IF
AD
0.00
0.
00
Act
ivity
2.5
.1.2
Dis
tric
t Spa
tial
Incl
usio
n F
und
esta
blis
hmen
t
D
istr
ict
spat
ial
incl
usio
n
fund
cre
ated
in 7
dis
tric
ts
X
10
7
0
0
99
996
2000
25.6
IV
80 %
IFA
D+
10
%
Lgov
+10
% B
enef
0.00
0.
00
T
ota
l on
Su
b-C
om
po
nen
t 2.
5 10
8576
.0 0.
00.
038
30.0
49.1
0.0
0.
0
T
ota
l on
Co
mp
on
ent
2 74
8074
.40
0.00
0.00
7127
4.00
913.
7726
74.5
4
2674
.54
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
6
9
Co
mp
on
en
t 3
: P
ro
ject
Man
ag
em
en
t In
clu
sin
g M
&E a
nd
Kn
ow
led
ge M
an
ag
em
en
t N
ote
: Expense u
pto
15 J
ULY 2
012
Convers
taio
n r
ate
SD
1 =
78 N
PR
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
A. P
MU
Par
t
P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent,
ad
viso
ry a
nd
co
ord
inat
ion
sy
stem
s o
per
atin
g
effe
ctiv
ely
PS
C a
nd P
CS
G m
eetin
gs
taki
ng p
lace
on
quar
terly
ba
sis.
2.
Ach
ieve
men
t of p
roje
ct
targ
ets
(AW
PB
pla
nned
vs
. ach
ieve
d).
3.
Tim
ely
prod
uctio
n of
A
WP
B a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rts.
A
.1 P
rog
ram
Act
ivity
3.1
.1:
Pro
ject
Im
plem
enta
tion
Man
ual
(PIM
) ap
prov
al
& p
ublic
atio
n
With
app
rova
l fr
om P
SC
20
0 P
IM w
ould
hav
e be
en p
ublis
hed
out
X
1
1
2
1
65
0
30
0 3.
85
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
439.
50
90
.40
Act
ivity
3.1
.2:
Pro
ject
D
ocum
enta
ry
Dev
elop
men
t
With
gen
eral
des
crip
tion
of p
roje
ct, o
ne
ducu
men
tary
dev
elop
ed
X
N A
1
1
1
50
0 6.
41
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
250.
00
25
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.3:
Info
rmat
ion
&
Com
mun
icat
ion
Cen
ter
Est
ablis
hmen
t
One
ICC
est
ablis
hed
X
N A
1
1
1
30
0 3.
85
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
221.
00
22
1.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.4:
NG
O
Ope
ratio
nal
Man
ual
With
NG
O o
pera
tiona
l gu
idel
ines
100
NG
O
oper
atio
nal M
anua
l pu
blis
hed
& d
istr
ibut
ed
X
1
1
1
1
50
0
30
0 3.
85
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
261.
00
26
1.00
Act
ivity
3.
1.5:
Pro
ject
10
0 P
roje
ct F
und
Ope
ratio
n M
anua
l
X
1
1
1
1
500
300
3.85
II
85%
IF
AD
0.
00
0.
00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
70
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
Fun
d O
pera
tion
Man
ual
publ
ishe
d
+15
%G
oN
Act
ivity
3.1
.6:
Pro
ject
F
inan
cial
O
pera
tiona
l M
anua
l
100
proj
ect f
inan
cial
op
erat
iona
l man
ual
publ
ishe
d
X
1
1
0
0
500
300
3.85
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.7:
Pro
ject
S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ee
mee
ting
At l
east
3 P
SC
mee
ting
coun
duct
ed
X
X
X
1 8
3
5
3
20
00
450
5.77
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
618.
64
52
5.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.8::
Pro
ject
Sta
rt
Up
Mee
ting
( S
urkh
et)
1
0
1
0
16
45
0 0.
00
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
300.
00
0.
00
Act
ivity
3.1
.9:
Pro
ject
C
onsu
ltativ
e an
d C
oord
inat
ion
Gro
up M
eetin
g
At l
east
3 P
CC
G m
eetin
g co
undu
cted
X
X
X
1 8
3
4
3
900
500
6.41
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
218.
65
20
0.00
Act
ivity
3.
1.10
:Pla
nnin
g &
Rev
iew
W
orks
hop
3 P
lann
ing
& R
evie
w
wro
ksho
p co
nduc
ted
and
feed
bac
k / i
nput
wou
ld
have
bee
n re
ceiv
ed f
or
plan
ning
X
X
X
1 2
3
3
3
95
40
1800
23
.08
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
514.
00
51
4.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.11:
: P
roje
ct
Laun
ch
Wor
ksho
p (C
entr
al)
1
0
1
0
12
45
0 0.
00
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
333.
00
0.
00
Act
ivity
3.1
.12
P
roje
ct
Orie
ntat
ion
Wor
ksho
p (D
istr
ict l
evel
)
Line
age
ncie
s,
stak
ehol
ders
&
bene
ficia
ries
in 7
Dis
tric
w
ould
hav
e be
en a
war
ed
abou
t HV
AP
X
X
1 0
7
7
7
2500
21
00
26.9
2 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
860.
00
86
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.13
: M
onito
ring
&
Eva
luat
ion
Sys
tem
D
evel
opm
ent
M&
E s
yste
m in
line
to
proj
ect d
esig
n de
velo
ped
X
X
2
1
1
1
2385
10
00
12.8
2 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
7
1
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
Act
ivity
3.1
.14:
M
anag
emen
t In
form
atio
n S
yste
m
Dev
elop
men
t
MIS
dev
elo;
ed a
nd w
ould
be
ass
istin
g in
pro
ject
pl
anni
ng &
im
plem
enta
tion
X
X
2
1
0
0
2340
10
00
12.8
2 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.15:
S
uppo
rt fo
r M
onito
ring
&
Eva
luat
ion
Sys
tem
D
evel
opm
ent
2
0
0
0
31
20
0 0.
00
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.16:
P
rogr
am
Mon
itorin
g,
Sup
ervi
sion
an
d R
epor
ting
Atle
ast 3
Qua
rter
ly, 1
A
nnua
l rep
ort
prod
uced
an
d ov
eral
l sta
tus
of
proj
ect r
efle
cted
X
X
X
7 2
30
36
30
4770
16
00
20.5
1 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
1995
.00
15
45.0
0
Act
ivity
3.1
.17:
In
tera
ctio
n w
orks
hop
with
S
take
hold
ers
Coo
rdin
atio
n &
co
llabo
ratio
n am
ong
stak
ehol
ders
dev
elop
ed
X
X
5
2
2
2
1950
45
0 5.
77
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
357.
00
35
7.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.18:
S
uppo
rtin
g S
tudy
&
Sur
vey
for
Pro
ject
3 su
ppor
ting
stud
ies
com
plet
ed
X
X
N A
2
0
0
900
11.5
4 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.19:
O
utco
me
Mon
itorin
g
1 O
utco
me
repo
rt
prep
ared
X
6
1
0
0
7158
40
0 5.
13
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.20:
E
ffect
/Impa
ct
Stu
dy
1 R
epor
t on
proj
ect e
ffect
pr
epar
ed
X
6
1
0
0
10
140
500
6.41
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.21:
P
roje
ct
Bas
elin
e S
urve
y (I
nclu
ding
R
IMS
In
dica
tor)
1 B
asel
ine
stud
y in
clud
ing
RIM
S in
dica
tor
com
plet
ed
X
X
X
3
1
0
0
10
140
2000
25
.64
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.22:
C
ontr
actin
g E
xper
ts (
Fro
m
4 ex
prer
ts c
ontr
acte
d to
fu
nctio
n in
thei
r ca
paci
ty
X
X
X
5
4
4
4
54
000
5960
76
.41
II 85
%
IFA
D
+15
%26
47.0
0
2647
.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
72
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
PM
U)
GoN
Act
ivity
3.1
.23:
O
ther
C
onsu
ltanc
y S
ervi
ce
(Acc
ount
&
othe
r st
atis
tical
so
ftwar
e pa
ckag
e &
co
mpu
ter
skill
s, A
MC
co
ntra
ct,
Pro
ject
P
lann
ing,
M
onito
ring
and
Oth
ers)
Diff
eren
t con
sulta
ncy
serv
ice
rece
ived
in
supp
ort o
f pro
ject
X
X
X
N A
2
2
2
1400
17
.95
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
806.
00
80
6.00
Act
ivity
: 3.1
.24:
T
rain
inng
on
Fin
anci
al
Mna
gem
ent t
o IF
AD
fund
ed
proj
ect s
taffs
-
logi
stic
sup
port
1
1
1
200
2.56
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
69.0
0
69.0
0
Act
ivity
:3.1
.25:
IF
AD
su
perv
isio
n m
issi
on
logi
sitic
m
anag
emen
t
2
2
2
200
2.56
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
253.
00
25
3.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.26:
: O
ffice
ren
t (P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent
Uni
t, S
urkh
et ,
Con
tact
Offi
ce,
Kat
hman
du)
Offi
ce b
uild
ings
in
Sur
khet
& K
athm
andu
re
nted
in
X
X
X
5
4
4
4
73
44
1800
23
.08
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
1505
.50
14
38.0
0
Act
ivity
3.1
.27:
H
iring
Veh
icle
fo
r P
roje
ct
activ
ities
X
X
X
2
12
13
12
11
60
450
5.77
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
55.0
0
0.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
7
3
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
Act
ivity
3.1
.28:
C
ontr
actin
g C
ompu
ter
oper
ator
(2),
D
river
(2)
, O
ffice
M
esse
nger
(4)
8 pr
ojec
t sta
ff hi
red
in
cont
ract
ed
X
X
X
7
7
12
7
3864
0
10
40
13.3
3 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
887.
55
83
6.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.29:
V
alue
Cha
in
Stu
dy T
our
(For
eign
C
ount
ry)
Pro
ject
sta
ff pa
rtic
ipat
ed
in V
C to
ur
X
6
1
0
0
90
00
2600
33
.33
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.30:
V
alue
Cha
in
Tra
inin
g fo
r P
MU
Sta
ff (F
orei
gn
Cou
ntry
)
Pro
ject
sta
ff pa
rtic
ipat
ed
& e
xpos
ed in
in
tera
natio
nal V
C tr
aini
ng
X
6
1
1
1
90
00
4200
53
.85
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
4329
.00
43
29.0
0
Act
ivity
3.1
.31:
V
alue
Cha
in
Tra
inin
g fo
r S
take
hold
er
(Inc
ludi
ng
PM
U S
taff)
Pro
ject
sta
ff &
st
akeh
olde
rs d
evel
oped
sk
ills
in tr
aini
ng
X
6
1
1
1
60
00
1500
19
.23
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
200.
00
20
0.00
A
ctiv
ity 3
.1.3
2:
Pro
ject
GIS
M
appi
ng
GIS
pro
duct
of p
roje
ct
deve
lope
d
X
1
1
1
1
570
1000
12
.82
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
385.
00
38
5.00
A
ctiv
ity 3
.1.3
3:
Offi
ce
Fur
nish
ing
X
X
3
2
3
2
10
00
500
6.41
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
1300
.00
50
0.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.34:
P
roje
ct
Web
site
U
pdat
ing
Web
site
of p
roje
ct
upda
ted
X
X
X
6
1
2
1
1200
30
0 3.
85
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
277.
30
15
3.00
Act
ivity
3.1
.35:
P
roje
ct
Bro
chur
e,
Pam
phle
t, Le
afle
ts, F
lex,
C
alen
dar,
D
iary
Pro
ject
bro
chur
e,
pam
plet
, lea
flet,
diar
y
prep
ared
X
X
X
1 8
3
10
3
30
00
1500
19
.23
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
986.
47
78
2.50
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
74
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
prep
arat
ion,
pu
blic
atio
n an
d di
strib
utio
n
Act
ivity
3.1
.36:
P
roje
ct
Adv
ertis
emen
t &
Vis
ibili
ty
(Rad
io, T
V,
New
spap
er,
Hoa
rdin
g B
oard
, T-S
hirt
, B
ag, C
ap e
tc)
Obj
ectiv
e &
str
ateg
y of
pr
ojec
t and
oth
er p
roje
ct
activ
ities
sha
red
in th
e ar
ea
X
X
X
6 0
12
12
12
1200
0
30
00
38.4
6 II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
1159
.40
11
59.4
0
T
ota
l on
Pro
gra
mm
e (P
MU
)
2048
97
0 40
350
517.
3077
2122
8.01
18
381.
3
A.2
Pro
cure
men
t
A.
2.1
Mac
hin
ery
Item
s P
rocu
rem
ent
6
55
66
D
eskt
op C
omp
(Bra
nded
with
S
oftw
ares
),
X
X
N A
3
11
3
195
2.50
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
795.
00
19
5.00
La
ptor
p C
omp
(With
so
ftwar
es)
X
X
N A
7
13
9
524
6.72
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
904.
00
52
4.00
F
ax M
achi
ne
X
N A
2
4
2
36
0.46
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
56.0
0
36.0
0
P
hoto
copy
M
achi
ne
Acc
esor
y pa
rt
X
N A
1
3
1
75
0.96
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%
325.
00
75
.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
7
5
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
GoN
D
igita
l Cam
era
X
N A
2
5
2
50
0.64
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
110.
00
50
.00
G
ener
ator
X
N A
0
1
0
0
0.00
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
200.
00
0.
00
In
vert
er (
With
B
atte
ry)
X
N A
2
3
2
185
2.37
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
185.
00
18
5.00
U
PS
X
N A
12
10
10
120
1.54
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
220.
00
12
0.00
P
rinte
rs
X
N A
1
4
1
35
0.45
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
160.
00
35
.00
T
elep
hone
In
terc
om
Inst
alla
tion
X
N A
1
2
1
65
0.83
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
145.
00
65
.00
M
ultim
edia
P
roje
ctor
X
N A
2
0
0
0.00
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
164.
81
0.
00
S
cree
n
X
N A
0
2
0
0
0.00
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
20.0
0
0.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
76
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
S
cann
ing
Mac
hine
X
N A
2
2
2
15
0.
19
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
15.0
0
15.0
0
T
ota
l on
mac
hin
ary
item
s p
rocu
rem
ent
5566
13
00
16.6
6667
3299
.81
0 13
00.0
0
A.
2.2
Fu
rnit
ure
It
ems
Rev
olvi
ng
chai
r,T
able
,Sof
a, C
ompu
ter
tabl
e/C
hair,
A
lmira
h, B
oard
et
c)
X
X
X
3 0
5
20
5
500
6.41
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
1299
.47
50
0.00
T
ota
l on
fu
rnit
ure
pro
cure
men
t 0
500
6.41
0256
1299
.47
50
0.00
A.
2.3
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n It
ems
B
atte
ry C
ycle
3
3
0
150
0.
00
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
145.
00
0.
00
M
otor
cyc
le
1 0
5
0
17
00
0.
00
I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
839.
50
0.
00
V
ehic
le
(Dou
ble
Cab
)
3
2
0
1800
0 20
33
26.0
6 I
85%
IF
AD
+
15
%G
oN
6564
.72
20
33.0
0
T
ota
l on
tra
nsp
ort
atio
n it
ems
pro
cure
men
t 79
52
19
850
2033
26
.064
1
75
49.2
2
2033
.00
T
ota
l on
Pro
cure
men
t 13
518
19
850
3833
49
.141
03
12
148.
50
38
33.0
0
A.3
Op
erat
ion
al C
ost
s &
Mis
cella
neo
us
P
MU
Sal
ary
N A
LS
42
120
3510
45
.00
Va
100%
G
oN
28
75.0
0
2824
.00
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
7
7
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
P
MU
Offi
ce
Exp
ense
s
N A
Ls
1126
08
9384
12
0.31
V
b
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
6651
.43
49
91.0
0
T
ota
l of
PM
U O
per
atio
nal
co
st
1547
28
1289
4.00
165.
31
95
26.4
3
7815
.00
Out
put 3
.2. :
A
func
tioni
ng
gend
er s
trat
egy
that
gui
des
gend
er
mai
nstr
eam
ing
and
faci
litat
es
proj
ect r
epon
se
to g
ende
r is
sues
Ach
ieve
men
t of t
he
proj
ect's
gen
der
targ
ets
for
wom
en's
par
ticip
atio
n in
pro
ject
act
iviti
ess
A
ctiv
ity 3
.2.1
0.
00
0.
00
A
ctiv
ity 3
.2.2
0.
00
0.
00
0.00
0.00
T
ota
l on
Ou
tpu
t 3.
2
0.
00
0.
00
T
ota
l on
Co
mp
on
ent
3 f
or
PM
U
3731
43
19
850
5707
7.00
73
1.76
42
902.
94
30
029.
30
B. S
NV
Par
t
3.3 .1
Ou
tpu
t 3.
3 In
crea
sed
ca
pac
ity
wit
hin
g
ove
rnm
ent
to g
uid
e va
lue
chai
n
dev
elo
pm
ent
1. N
o. o
f sup
port
ive
valu
e ch
ain
linke
d po
licie
s an
d le
gisl
atio
n
2. N
o of
pol
icy
dial
ogue
ev
ents
and
“pr
oduc
ts”
prod
uced
(i.e
. wor
ksho
ps,
polic
y br
iefs
, inf
orm
atio
n m
ater
ials
).
Act
ivity
3.
3.1:
Com
mun
icat
ion
& ID
OS
/ P
OS
stra
tegy
de
velo
pmen
t
1 C
omm
unic
atio
n an
d ID
OS
st
rate
gy w
ill b
e de
velo
ped
thro
ugh
cons
ulta
tions
at
vario
us le
vel
X
X
S N V
1
2
2
2
10
79
2 10
.15
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
241.
38
24
1.38
An
nu
al P
rog
ress
Re
po
rt 2
01
1-1
2
78
A
nn
ua
l Pro
gre
ss R
ep
ort
20
11
-12
/HV
AP
Results #
Obj
ectiv
es/E
xpec
ted
Res
ults
Indi
cato
rs
Responsible Unit/ Staff
Impl
emen
tatio
n ta
rget
s B
udge
t ('0
00)
Pro
ject
Indi
cato
rs
RIMS Indicators
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Appraisal (Total)
Revised (Total)
Planned (Annual)
Unit Cost (NPR)
Unit Cost (USD)
Achieved
(Cumulative)
%
Achieved
(Annual)
%
Appraisal (Total)
NPR
Appraisal (Total) USD
Proposed Revision (Total)
Planned (Annual) In NPR' 000
Planned (Annual)
USD
Budget Category
Financier
Spent (Cumulative)
In NPR' 000
%
Spent (Annual) In NPR' 000
%
(A
) (B
) (C
)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(F.a
)(G
)
(Ga)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(L
.a)
(M
) (N
) (O
) (P
) (Q
)(R
) (S
)
A
ctiv
ity 3
.3.2
: K
now
ledg
e P
rodu
cts
(pub
licat
ion)
1 P
roje
ct V
ideo
do
cum
enta
ry a
nd 1
VC
st
udy
pub
licat
ion
will
be
prod
uced
and
di
ssem
inat
ed
X
X
X
S N V
1 0
2
50
75
6 9.
69
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.3
.3:
Kno
wle
dge
shar
ing
even
ts
(nat
iona
l/reg
iona
l wor
ksho
ps)
1 N
atio
nal
leve
l w
orks
hop
on K
now
ledg
e sh
arin
g on
IB a
ppro
ach
will
be
cond
ucte
d
X
S N V
1 2
1 tim
es
0
60
576
7.38
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.3
.4:
Tra
inin
g on
K
now
ledg
e M
anag
emen
t
2 ev
ents
trai
ning
on
know
ledg
e m
anag
emen
t w
ill b
e co
nduc
ted
to
proj
ect s
take
hold
ers
X
X
S N V
4
2 tim
es
1
1
20
381
4.88
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
44.7
0
44.7
0
Act
ivity
3.3
.4:
Pol
icy
dial
ogue
(m
eetin
gs/w
ork
shop
s fo
r ac
t/byl
aws)
1 p
olic
y an
d le
gisl
atio
n w
orks
hop
will
be
cond
ucte
d su
ppor
ting
faci
litat
ing
VC
de
velo
pmen
t
X
X
S N V
9
1 tim
es
45
332
4.26
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
Kn
ow
led
ge
Man
agem
ent
(KM
) st
aff
cost
s
No.
of K
now
ledg
e S
hare
d
0.
00
0.00
0.00
Act
ivity
3.3
.5:
KM
co
ordi
nato
r-na
tiona
l (25
%)
X
X
X
1 8
3
2
2
73.8
88
6 11
.36
Va
100%
IF
AD
66
7.05
667.
05
Act
ivity
3.3
.6:
Com
mun
icat
ion
offic
er-
natio
nal (
25%
)
X
X
X
1 8
3
3.37
5
3
54
648
8.31
V
a 10
0%
IFA
D
964.
00
71
9.00
Act
ivity
3.3
.7:
Con
sulta
nts
(Gen
der/
ID/C
om
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
m
oder
atio
n)
X
X
LS
0
20
360
4.62
II
85%
IF
AD
+
15%
GoN
0.00
0.00
T
ota
l Bu
dg
et f
or
SN
V
332.
8
0 47
31
60.6
5
19
17.1
3
1672
.13
To
tal o
n C
om
po
nen
t 3
61
808
792.
4103
4482
0.07
31
701.
43
Annual Progress Report 2011-12
Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP 79
Annex 8: List of procured vehicles and materials in FY 2011/12
Planned procurement item Target Achieved Store code
SNV part
Vehicles (double cabin) 1 1
Motorcycles (150cc) 3 3
Computers (laptop) 7 7
Printer 1 1
Camera 3 3
Overhead projector plus screen 1 1
AEC part
Motorcycle 1 1
Computer (Laptop) 1 1
PMU part
Desktop Comp (including
software), 3 3 25174
Laptop Computer (including
software) 7 9 26147
Fax Machine 2 2 24-47
Photocopy Machine Accessory
part 1 1 2847
Digital Camera 2 2 32147
Inverter (With Battery) 2 2 36147
UPS 12 10 48147
Printers 1 1 22147
Telephone Intercom Installation 1 1 42-47
Scanning Machine 2 2 44-47
Revolving chair, Table, Sofa,
Computer table/Chair, Almirah,
Board etc)
5 5 4-12 and 16
GPS recorder 0 1 74-47
80 Annual Progress Report 2011-12/HVAP
HVAP Sharing Materials
g]kfn ;/sf/
s[lif ljsf; dGqfnopRr d"No s[lif j:t' ljsf; cfof]hgf
(High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas)
cfof]hgf Joj:yfkg sfof{no, ;'v]{t;Dks{ kmf]gM )*#�%@))#*, ÇofS;M )*#�%@%$)#
;Dks{ sfof{no, s'df/Lkf6L, nlntk'/;Dks{ kmf]g÷ÇofS;M )!�%%%@(&&
;+s]tcfof]hgf If]qpQ/�blIf0f ;8sv08k"j{�klZrd /fhdfu{
cfof]hgf If]qsf] gSzf
;8s v08af6 cfof]hgfsf If]qx¿ -306fdf_ / afnL j:t'
;8s v08x¿! ;'v]{t�hfh/sf]6@ ;'v]{t�b}n]v# ;'v]{t�h'Dnf
# 306f^ 306f
!@ 306f
;'v]{t
#
@
!
Web site: www.hvap.gov.np; Email: [email protected]