governance and poverty (2007)

Upload: laliga

Post on 14-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    1/25

    Lessons onGovernance & Poverty

    Horacio R. Morales,Jr.

    President, La Liga Policy Institute

    Former Secretary, Department of Agrarian Reform

    April 26, 2007

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    2/25

    Amidst news report and officialpronouncement of Malacaang on

    the countrys economic recovery,hunger in the Philippines has risen

    to an all time high.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    3/25

    SWS Survey Results

    Record high incidence of involuntary hungerreaching 19 percent as of the first quarter of2007

    Estimated 3.4 million Filipino households hadnothing to eat at least once in the past threemonths

    Double digit incidence of involuntary hungerrecorded since June 2004

    62 percent of Filipinos rating themselves aspoor

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    4/25

    Official Data Official poverty data, however, at best remain

    sketchy.

    NSCB pegs the annual per capita povertythreshold as of March 2007 at P14,866/year orP41 per day

    Annual food threshold is peg at P9,350/ year orP25 per day (2005 is latest data available).

    Poverty Incidence estimates range from 30 to 40percent of the Philippine population or around 24to 30 million Filipinos.

    The incidence of absolute poor is estimatedbetween 16 to 20 percent or around 10 to 15

    million Filipinos.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    5/25

    The problem of hunger while glaring

    only exposes the surface of a longstanding deeply entrenched and

    multi-faceted development dilemma

    begging for an in-depth

    understanding, critical assessment,

    innovative, concerted and sustainedsolutions.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    6/25

    Facets of the Hunger Problem

    Is the phenomena of hunger transient or a permanentoccurrence?

    Is hunger a result from the lack of food? Is it thereforecaused by the lack of supply of food or a problem ofdistribution or marketing of current food production?

    Or are food prices high and therefore unaffordable?Is it caused by the lack of incomes, the lack of cash

    resources that will allow a family to buy food? Is ittherefore an issue of lack of employment or an issueof low wages? Or an issue of productivity and lowfarm incomes for the rural poor?

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    7/25

    Or do poor Filipino families lack the capacity to earndecently in order for them to afford three squaremeals a day? Therefore, is it an issue of economic orsocial skills, knowledge and assets, or the lack ofaccess to the market?

    Do the hungry poor even have the capacity toinfluence state and non-state development agents to

    assist them or to involve them in defining policiesand programs that will impact on their impoverishedsituation?

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    8/25

    Responses to these questionsdetermine distinct but interrelated

    frameworks.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    9/25

    What Are We Certain Of

    Poverty in the Philippines persists. Despite themany different means of measuring incomepoverty, the trend is clear income poverty isworsening since 1997.

    Looking at poverty purely from the incomeapproach is not enough. It is important to look atpoverty in its varied dimensions.

    Consequently, addressing poverty by simplyspurring economic growth is necessary but notsufficient.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    10/25

    Governance &Poverty

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    11/25

    State Responses to Hunger

    After the SWS report on hunger came out,Government immediately announced that itintends to allocate its income from the sale ofsequestered shares from PLDT amounting to

    PhP 25 billion pesos to eradicate hunger in thecountry.

    According to NEDA Director General Neri PhP20 billion will be utilized for upland developmentprojects while PhP 5 billion will go to food forschool and other feeding programs

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    12/25

    This is very similar to governments response

    when hunger initially reached 15 percent in

    2004.

    At that time the Arroyo government was quick

    to respond by launching a food coupon

    program that targeted 5 million poor Filipinos.

    By design the program would have distributed

    coupons that can be exchanged for groceries.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    13/25

    These knee jerk anti-hunger programs has beenlargely been criticized for its dole-out approach andfor its short-sightedness in addressing the issue ofpoverty.

    These attempts, however, typifies state initiatedprograms aimed at alleviating and reducing poverty inthe Philippines.

    High profile programs aimed at populist acceptancewithout much consideration for the varyingdimensions and causes of poverty are bound to fallshort in achieving the objectives of poverty reduction.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    14/25

    The ADB Poverty Report arguesPOLITICS is becoming the main

    problem confronting the country today

    weak governance seems to be themajor contributory factor for the

    economys lackluster performance and

    the insignificant impacts on povertyover the years.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    15/25

    Governance Issues

    A considerable amount of resources, aboutP13.5 billion or the threshold requirementsgood enough for about 232,658 households or4% of the estimated poor population

    (headcount) in year 2000, have already beenspent for these programs.

    The resources expended nonetheless appear

    to have been inefficiently rendered, consideringthat the effectiveness odds (in terms of targets)have been 1:2.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    16/25

    Program Discontinuity

    The discontinuity in the programs, isdisadvantageous to the poor.

    Program life appears to be co-terminus

    with the governing regime. The inconsistency in poverty frameworks

    and policy puts programs in never-ending transitions which have concretecosts in terms of time and resources.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    17/25

    Changing Framework andTargeting Mechanisms

    Changing framework and policies led tovariations in spatial and beneficiary targeting.

    Government tends to change its mind over who

    should benefit from poverty reduction once itassumes office.

    Even changes in poverty measurement

    methodologies impact on targeting mechanisms. In most cases, targeting has been very

    vulnerable to political capture.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    18/25

    Changing InstitutionalMechanisms

    The National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC)evolved from the Social Reform Council (SRC).

    However, roles and expectations from the NAPC

    have changed across administrations. Periods of institutional transition has contributed

    to a less than favorable performance ofgovernment poverty reduction programs.

    Over time processes of political participationenshrined in the NAPC has become highlypoliticized.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    19/25

    Also, despite the existence of centralized

    mechanisms for poverty program coordination,

    attempts at convergence coming together ofvarious agencies in the operationalization of

    coordinated anti-programs have not been as

    successful.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    20/25

    Erratic and Limited Financing

    Financing for anti-poverty and poverty

    reduction programs has also been erratic.

    It is highly dependent on the priority accordedby the sitting administration.

    The already limited resources for these

    programs are further limited by corruption andinefficient use of resources.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    21/25

    Where To? HowCan We Move

    Forward?

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    22/25

    The Challenge Identification of the poor

    Understanding the various dimensions of poverty Equally important - adopt a coherent and

    sustained anti-poverty program

    Adopt a more pro-active anti-poverty governancemechanism not only at the central state level butmore especially at the local level

    Bring together substantive participation andpartnerships from reformers within government,citizens and citizen groups, communityorganizations and even the private sector

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    23/25

    For La Liga and our network non-government

    organizations such as PRRM and Convergence:

    We are developing an approach to poverty

    reduction which centers on building sustainable

    communities. Primary Engines - Participatory local governance

    and social enterprise development

    Equally important - build and sustain a national,regional and global network advocating for

    policy shifts in favor of sustainable development.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    24/25

    With the persistence of poverty in thePhilippines, one thing is becoming

    clearer and clearer. A linear, traditionaland simplistic approach and perspectivein addressing the issue of poverty must

    give way to a multi-dimensionalappreciation of the issue.

  • 7/27/2019 Governance and Poverty (2007)

    25/25

    The era of quick fixes must be put to an end.We need to put in place honest, deliberate,

    systematic and synergistic developmentprograms if at all we are going to

    substantially, qualitatively and sustainablyuplift the lives of the Filipino poor.