govdiv summer school firenze 27-29 august 2014 tiziana chiappelli florence university italy

26
GovDiv Summer School Firenze 27-29 August 2014 Tiziana Chiappelli Florence University ITALY

Upload: mitchell-fleming

Post on 01-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

GovDiv

Summer SchoolFirenze

27-29 August 2014

Tiziana ChiappelliFlorence University

ITALY

Aims of the project

2

• The Parti-GE.MI project aims to enhance migrant women's and men's participation for active citizenship.

• It analyzes existing obstacles to migrants' political participation and strives to remove them both at policy design and implementation level, • ensuring equal treatment

and improved diversity management in public and private work places.

Vision• The project vision is that

migrant women and men have a right to fully participate in civil and political institutions and that host societies have an interest as well as the responsibility to ensure that right.

• It strives to enhance solidarity and a shared sense of belonging among natives, migrants and EU citizens.

3

4

ObjectivesThe project strives to:• Assess and address the diversified needs of

migrant women and men regarding their civil/political, social, economic and cultural integration through action and policy oriented research across four European countries.

• Increase active citizenship capacities and resources through meaningful and sustained contact and interaction between migrants and natives (consultation meetings, capacity building training, mentoring, open learning sessions with stakeholders) structured around specific institutions i.e. local councils, trade unions and school councils.

• C. Develop and transfer knowledge about innovative and effective gender sensitive policy measures to broaden participatory opportunities and to be mainstreamed at integration policies.

5

Partnership

The six project partners, Non-Governmental Organizations and Universities, are from four European countries and experienced in migration projects, policies and research• CRWI Diotima in Greece, • Institute of Social Research,Frankfurt

am Main and • Berami e.V. in Germany, • University of Florence and• Association Progretto Arcobaleno in

Italy • Foundation Surt in Spain.

6

Current trendsIntegration is a two-way process of mutual accommodation by migrants and non-migrant residents and a gendered process with diverse impacts, on men and women.

The issue of migrants' civic participation has been raised on the EU agenda and in various national policies yet, legal and policy implementation barriers exclude or discourage migrants from exercising citizenship rights

Commonly identified trends to be further examined are:• Notwithstanding national differences, the dominant perception for the participation of migrants is the Gastarbeiter perception.• Migrants have very few civil/citizenship rights in most EU countries. • There is no common legal framework at EU level, or a European policy on integration and particularly citizenship rights.

7

ChallengesOn a European, state and local level, the challenges are:

• to reach a citizen-centred and gender sensitive integration process

• to open multiple citizenship pathways

• to ensure equal opportunities for participation in economic, political, social and cultural life and

• to preserve social cohesion and deepen democracy across Europe.

8

The steps of the project

• Mapping: legal and institutional framework• Qualitative research to identify barriers of

participation: focus groups, in-depth interviews with migrants and key informants

• Capacity building courses and mentoring• Feedback and evaluation of project impact

Activities_ Action Research• Mapping of the legal

and institutional framework for participation

• Qualitative research to identify barriers of participation

• Consultation meetings of targeted stakeholders– 3 stakeholder meetings

at national level

9

Activities_ Capacity Building

• Development of Capacity building Methods

addressed to local and migrants “gate openers”• Implementation of Pilot

Capacity building training in – «Diversity Participation

skills and Mentoring Competences »

addressed to locals and migrants “gate openers”

10

Activities_ Working Together

• Implementation of «Working Together» Mentoring programmes

• Dissemination and diffusion of the project results– 4 National Open Learning

meetings– 1 International

Conference

• Monitoring and Evaluation

11

Alliances-Networking• Parti-GE.MI promotes the effective

cooperation between national, regional and local administrations to support integration and the engagement of the receiving communities in interacting with migrants, and based on the mutual respect of their rights, obligations and different cultures.

• Parti- GE.MI invites all relevant actors and stakeholders to engage in the project activities.

• We are committed to an open ended communication and sharing of experiences and challenges.

The project team

12

 Mapping of the legal and institutional framework for participation

• mapping of the laws and policies related to the participation of migrants in three areas of society (political, educational and representation in trade unions)

• in-depth interviews and focus groups with immigrants and stakeholders

• The results of this first part of the research are not exciting, despite some positive experiences

• Qualitative and quantitative on migrants’ participation in the three areas are partial when not completely missing

• No specific emphases on gender dimension• This lack of data renders very difficult any attempt to assess

European and National integration policies• In general, it is difficult to judge the level of migrants’ participation in

Italian society as satisfactory

13

14

Participation in Trade Unions

• In Italy, in 1989, CISL established the National Association Beyond Borders (Associazione Nazionale Oltre Le Frontiere– ANOLF) and set up the “Centres for services to immigrants” (Centri servizi per gli immigrati).

• In the same period CGIL founded the “Centres for foreign workers” (Centri lavoratori stranieri) and approved the creation of regional and local coordination units of migrants, composed of migrant workers together with Italian union organisers.

15

Participation in trade unions

• For immigrants participation in trade unions do not seem to exist any severe formal obstacles, with the exception, in some cases, of the requirement of being a legal resident in the country.

• Few positive measures have been adopted in order to promote migrants’ participation in trade unions.

• Positive relations between trade unions and migrants: constant increase in migrants’ subscriptions (4-5% of annual increase).

16

Criticism inside union trades organisations

• The main points of criticism are– the lack of professional mobility – the absence of migrants in higher levels of

organisations– Crystal ceiling between the lower and the higher

hierarchical levels

• In any case, the presence of migrants in trade unions is a well-established reality

• This has sometimes introduced migrants’ issues into the debate on employment status for major sectors of immigrant labour

17

Participation in School Councils

• In Italy, a number of laws, decrees, and guidelines at national and local level have underlined the role of education for migrants’ inclusion in society.

• The legislation identifies as an instrument for the promotion of the education of migrant children the active participation in school of their families and of ethnic communities’ members, migrant associations, cultural mediators etc.

18

Guidelines for foreign pupils’ integration in school 2014

• The New Guidelines for foreign pupils’ integration in school signed by the Minister of Education in 2014, dedicates a specific paragraph to the role of parents’ participation:

“to acquire a real learning experience and social inclusion are goals to which educational institutions should aim with the participation and collaboration of educational subjects on the territory: families, local authorities, universities,

associations, institutions […]”.• It is stressed that:

“it is indeed necessary for schools to establish a relationship of listening/dialogue with the family in order to understand the specific conditions and needs.”

• According to the New Guidelines, welcoming the family and accompanying it with a gradual integration corresponds to involving and allowing parents “to share school’s initiatives and activities, also sharing a teaching project that enhances the specificity of the pupil”.

• In this process, the New Guidelines suggest using mediators or interpreters to overcome language difficulties and also to facilitate the understanding of the educational choices of the school.

19

Migrant families and school

• Despite the favourable framework provided by the Guidelines, it seems that schools importance of involving migrant parents in decision-making processes is not very often recognized.

• Families of migrant students are mostly called at school in order to be informed about administrative issues, about the academic performance of their children or in case of behavioural problems.

• A strategy adopted by some schools to increase the opportunities for contact between families and school has been the institution of language courses for adults, specifically for migrant women (mothers).

• In general, parents involved in school activities are the same involved in political, social and cultural development and participation.

20

Participation in Local/Regional Elections and Local Governance

• In Italy the possibilities for an active participation of migrants in social and political life are still, from a legal point of view and both at national and local level, very limited.

• Italian Constitution that reserves the right to vote exclusively to Italian citizens.

• Despite the fact that since the 1990s several proposals have been made by different political parties for the inclusion of migrants in the electorate, no relative legal provision has been passed.

• It is important, however, to consider the role of local governing bodies with regard to migrants' right to vote at regional and local level.

21

State and local level

• The decisions taken by local governing bodies on the subject have created a conflict with the national level as to whether these bodies are entitled to legislate on this subject or not.

• Concerning the municipal level, the first municipalities to introduce the right to vote and be elected for migrants were Venice and Genoa under the advocacy efforts of a number of migrant and antiracist associations.

• The reaction of the State to such initiatives came with a circular issued by the Ministry of the Interior in January 2004 that indicated the illegitimacy of the acts endorsed by the municipalities stating that any change of the electoral body must be done through a Constitutional reform.

• However, municipalities made an appeal to the Council of State.

22

Regional level• At regional level, the first initiatives that emerge as particularly relevant are

those undertaken by Tuscany and Emilia Romagna.• Emilia Romagna introduced the right to vote for migrants, while the Tuscany

Region has included in its Statute the commitment to introduce the right to vote for migrants.

• After consecutive decisions of the Council of State, the jurisprudence has indicated that although some regions have tried to legislate on the issue, the right to vote for migrants represents a prerogative of the national legislator.

• The immigration law 40/1998 promoted and supported foreign associations, through the introduction of the “Consultative Body for migrant workers and their families”, and the “National Coordinating Organism of social-integration local policies”.

• At the local level the same legislation introduced the “Territorial Council for immigration” with the competence to monitor developments that concern migration and to propose specific measures to integrate migrants in local communities.

23

Bottom-up initiatives for the enhancement of migrants’ participation• In Italy some efforts have been made to enhance immigrant

participation in social and political life even if the obstacles and barriers are still many, both at legal and practical level.

• But: immigrants association, and in particular that of women, trade unions and some local bodies are very active in promoting immigrant inclusion in many areas of Italian society.

• The mapping activities and the interviews showed that non-conventional forms of participation are largely expressed through associations of migrants.

• Migrants join on the basis of national belonging, or can join in multi-ethnic or intercultural associations together with other immigrants of different nationalities or with Italian people as well.

• In the sector of education, for example, parents are involved in school activities in general as part of informal groups, such as parents’ committees.

24

Role of migrant women associations

• The role of migrant women have also formed many associations on a gender basis. • The first migrant women’s associations where set up in the ‘70s when migrant women

initially arrived in Italy, to be employed as domestic workers for middle-class families.• During the ‘80s, the first migrant women’s organisations on a national basis were

formed specifically to provide solidarity and mutual support networks.• Key organisations that were formed during the ‘80s on a national basis are the

Association of Women from Cape Verde, founded by Maria De Lourdes Jesus, and the Filipino Women’s Council set up by Charito Basa.

• Other significant associations based on nationality are the Eritrean Women’s Association and the Brazilian Women’s Association set up by Rosa Mendes.

• As well as migrant women associations that are set up on a national basis and women’s intercultural associations composed of migrant and Italian-born women, multi-ethnic associations composed of migrant women of differing nationalities were also set up in the 1990s, again with the aim of supporting migrant women in achieving their rights, e.g. NO.DI and Candelaria, both based in Rome or, in Florence, NOSOTRAS.

25

• The Italian team has conducted a focus group and 15 in-depth interviews with migrant people who have experienced some form of participation in the three selected area (politics, trade unions, education) of the host society, adopting a biographical approach.

• a critical perspective and an analysis of what is the state of art about the link and possibilities offered by national law and the real opportunity for migrants to exercise an active and effective participation in Italian public life.

26

Thank you!

[email protected]