gorchakov’s wish - bartlett design research...
TRANSCRIPT
Bartlett Design Research Folios
by Kreider + O’Leary
Gorchakov’s Wish
Project Details
Practice: Kreider + O’Leary
Designers: Kristen Kreider and James O’Leary
O’Leary and Kreider are partners in the collaborative practice Kreider + O’Leary.This project has joint and equal authorship of all project elements, including texts, academic papers, image construction, visuals, performances, and documentation.
Title: Gorchakov’s Wish
Output type: Performance
Lead venue: Kursaal, San Sebastián, Spain (Sep 2011)
Other venues: The Centre for Creative Collaboration, London (Apr 2011); Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design, London (Apr 2009); Stephen Lawrence Gallery, University of Greenwich, London (Jan 2009)
Funding: Irish Arts Council Architecture Bursary Award £5,000; CCW (Camberwell, Chelsea and Wimbledon Colleges of Art) University of the Arts Research Fund £3,000
Budget: £8,000
Bartlett Design Research Folios
Statement about the Research Content and Process
Description
Gorchakov’s Wish engages with the penultimate scene of Andrei Tarkovsky’s film Nostalghia (1983). Tarkovsky’s syntax of the slow extended tracking shot induces a contemplative state from which to observe the movement of a figure through an atmospheric Italian landscape, over a prolonged time. Using the above site as a case study, the aim of the project is to explore how we experience place and how we can communicate this experience to others in a meaningful way through moving image and performance practice.
Questions
1. How can we communicate a meaningful experience of ‘lost’ place through performative methods of documentation?
2. How can site-specific performance documentation construct a calibrated relationship between movement, place and image that relates to and expands upon Andrei Tarkovsky’s theory and practice of the film-image?
3. How can complex film-images inform a contemporary art and architecture practice, leading to the generation of an original artefact?
Methods
Taking this nine-minute four-second scene from Tarkovsky’s film as a site, its material and symbolic qualities are transformed into architectural performance through various forms of production: performance, installation and video production. The project develops a method extracted from – and combining – architecture, film and poetry. Its objective is twofold: to extend the language of performance and documentation by enacting each through interdisciplinary practice, and to expand upon a theory and practice of the ‘film-image,’ as initially suggested by Andrei Tarkovsky.
4 Gorchakov’s Wish
Dissemination
The work has been developed and presented in differing formats through performances, exhibitions, talks, papers and a residency over a three-year period between 2008 and 2011, culminating in a screening of the 20-minute HD video work Gorchakov’s Wish at the ‘On the Image’ conference, San Sebastián Film Festival, San Sebastián, Spain.
1 (previous page)Bagno Vignoni, Italy, showing the Santa Caterina Pool in the foreground, where scenes in Nostalghia are set
Statements 5
2
3
6 Gorchakov’s Wish
2
Introduction
Gorchakov’s Wish engages with the work of acclaimed Russian filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky, specifically, the penultimate scene from his film Nostalghia (1983). In this scene a single extended take and tracking shot follows the protagonist, the poet Gorchakov, as he enacts a ritualistic performance carrying a lit candle across the drained expanse of the Santa Caterina Pool – a natural thermal spring in the Tuscan hillside village of Bagno Vignoni. [fig. 1]
The resulting film-image is infused with an atmospheric combination of hot steam and morning sunlight. Meanwhile, Tarkovsky’s syntax of the slow extended tracking shot induces a contemplative state from which to observe, over a prolonged time, the pool and protagonist and the place. [fig. 2]
The aim of this research project is to explore how we experience place (using the above site as a case study), and how we can communicate this experience to others in a meaningful way.
Aims and Objectives
The aim of this work is to explore the communication of the material qualities of place through interdisciplinary performance and documentary practice. In an increasingly digitised culture, questions about how we relate to these qualities of place are raised, and how we can communicate unique experiences to
others in a meaningful way, through both old and new media. Such questions and issues are raised by Tarkovksy’s cinema, and particularly the film Nostalghia (1983), with its yearning for an experience of a ‘lost’ time and place at the level both of the filmic narrative and of the cinematic apparatus itself. [fig. 4]
Introduction / Aims and Objectives 7
2Three stills showing Gorchakov carrying a candle across the empty Santa Caterina Pool, Bagno Vignoni, Italy
3Sketch of sequence storyboard for Gorchakov’s Wish
4Opening titles of Gorchakov’s Wish, showing the steaming Santa Caterina Pool
4
8 Gorchakov’s Wish
5
5Annotated matrix of elements for Gorchakov’s Wish
Questions / Context 9
Questions
1. How can we communicate a meaningful experience of ‘lost’ place through performative methods of documentation?
2. How can site-specific performance documentation construct a calibrated relationship between movement, place
and image that relates to and expands upon Tarkovsky’s theory and practice of the film-image?
3. How can complex film-images inform a contemporary art and architecture practice, leading to the generation of an original artefact?
Context
Recent debates and discussions around site and site-specificity in visual arts practice can be found in: Miwon Kwon, One Place After Another: Site Specific Art and Locational Identity (2004); Nick Kaye, Site Specific Art: Performance, Place, Documentation (2004); and Jane Rendell, Art and Architecture: A Place Between (2007). For Kwon, site is a discursive construct, while Kaye suggests site-specificity is a performative practice and Rendell concludes that this practice of place can be ‘a critical spatial practice’.
Recent research in performance, notation and documentation includes: Matthew Reason, Documentation, Disappearance and the Representation of Live Performance (2006); Rachel Duerden and Neil Fisher, Dancing
Off the Page: Integrating Performance, Choreography Analysis and Notation/Documentation (2008); and Roselee Goldberg, Performa: New Visual Art Performance (2007). These works suggest interesting pathways to lead architectural discourse toward related cross-disciplinary practices, enabling new ways of approaching architectural representation and documentation.
A symposium exploring the influence of Tarkovsky on contemporary art practice held at the Tate Modern in 2008 included scholars and artist practitioners engaging with Tarkovsky’s work which exposed the research potential in the work beyond the confines of film studies.
10 Gorchakov’s Wish
Additionally, recent publications on Tarkovsky’s cinematic practice include: Nathan Dunne, Tarkovsky (2008); Robert Bird, Andrei Tarkovsky: Elements of Cinema (2008); and Gunnlaugur A. Jónsson and Thorkell Á. Óttarsson, Through the Mirror: Reflections on the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky
(2006). These works seek to highlight the relevance of Tarkovski’s output beyond a filmic context. Focusing on Tarkovsky’s theorisation of the film-image and its relation to place, our project contributes to this scholarship.
Methods
The project was carried out in four phases:
Site study
Visiting the three different publicly accessible sites in Italy, locations of the three final sequences from Tarkovsky’s Nostalghia:
a. Rome (Campidoglio on Capitaline Hill)b. Bagno Vignoni (Santa Catarina Pool)c. San Galgano (Cistercian Abbey Ruin)
These visits allow us to engage in architectural, photographic and filmic surveys and to gather other contextual and historical information for use in generating three site-specific performances.
Site performance
Generating three site-specific performances, one at each of the above locations, involving:
a. Employing architectural representational techniques of time-
based drawing, spatial projection and mapping to choreograph and score a performance specifically related to the spatial and material qualities of each given place or site. [fig. 3]
b. Integrating cinematographic techniques of framing, editing and point-of-view into the recording of each context-specific performance so that the resulting documentation constructed a carefully calibrated relationship between movement, place and image. [fig. 5 & 7]
By combining architectural strategies and cinematographic techniques in the development of each site-specific performance we extend the language of performance, notation and documentation, enacting these through interdisciplinary practice and thereby expanding upon a theory and practice of the film-image through its relation to place and performance. [fig. 6]
Questions / Context / Methods 11
6
6Still from Alba Lunedi. A performance sited in the Santa Caterina Pool in Bagno Vignoni, Italy, 2008. 8mm film transferred to DV
12 Gorchakov’s Wish
7
7Annotated scene sequencing drawing for Gorchakov’s Wish
Questions / Context / Methods 13
Displaced performance
Developing a further performative iteration, dislocated from site, involving:
a. Incorporating the documentation of our three site-specific performances into a single live performance;
b. Using poetic strategies of metaphor and metonymy to generate movement and gesture as well as word, image and object relations in the live action sequence;
c. Integrating the very act of documenting the live performance into the choreography of the live action sequences. [fig. 8–10]
By integrating the documentation of the three site-specific performances into a poetics of live performance, we communicate an experience of place to the audience through imagination, affect and cognition. In addition, through the act of recording this live event into a sequence of staged actions, the conventional distinction between performance and its documentation is collapsed.
Performance for video: Gorchakov’s Wish
The video Gorchakov’s Wish is a split-screen video piece comprised of three parts, each section reflecting our engagement with the final three scenes of Nostalghia, respectively. The first part, Parhessia, contains one piece of footage shot on location in Rome at Campidoglio on Capitoline Hill, where we carry a sign translating one line of text from Domenico’s speech in both English and Italian. [fig. 11]
The second part, Allegory, similarly contains footage shot on location at the original site of Tarkovsky’s film, Bagno Vignoni, and the footage is taken from our performance there entitled Alba Lunedì. [fig. 13]
This footage is paired with our studio re-construction of the scene using a long take and tracking shot. Beneath the coupling of these two moving images we have also included, scattered along the bottom of the screen space, clips taken from our multiple site visits to Bagno Vignoni as visual footnotes to the actions being performed. Finally, Elegy contains footage shot on location at San Galgano, the ruined church that appears at the end of Nostalghia. [fig. 12, 14 & 15]
This is also paired with our filmic re-construction of this scene. The 20-minute work was presented in San Sebastián at the ‘Image’ Conference, which formed part of the 2011 San Sebastián Film Festival. [fig. 16–18]
14 Gorchakov’s Wish
8–10Still from Fall: An Allegory. Performance at the Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design, London, 2009
11–12 (overleaf)Production stills from Gorchakov’s Wish – Part 1: Parhessia and Part 3: Elegy
Performance at the Centre for Creative Collaboration, London, 2011
8
9
10
Methods 15
11
16 Gorchakov’s Wish
12
Methods 17
13 (previous page)Production still from Gorchakov’s Wish – Part 2: Allegory. Performance at the Centre for Creative Collaboration, London, 2011
14Initial sketch design for spatial props for Gorchakov’s Wish – Part 3: Elegy
20 Gorchakov’s Wish
14
Methods 21
15
22 Gorchakov’s Wish
16
17
18
15Plan and elevation for design for spatial props for Gorchakov’s Wish – Part 3: Elegy
16–18HD DV video still from Gorchakov’s Wish – Part 2: Allegory. Performance at the Centre for Creative Collaboration, London
Methods 23
19a
19b
19Comparative elements of the work: a video still from Bagno Vignoni, Italy, and a prop from the set of Gorchakov’s Wish – Part 2: Allegory. Performance at the Centre for Creative Collaboration, London
24 Gorchakov’s Wish
Dissemination
The work has been developed and presented in differing formats through performances, exhibitions, talks, papers and a residency over a three-year period between 2008 and 2011.
Video
Gorchakov’s Wish. Presented at On the Image, the San Sebastián Film Festival, San Sebastián, Spain (Sep 2011).
Residency
The Centre for Creative Collaboration, London (Apr 2011). [fig. 19a & 19b]
Performances and exhibitions
Gorchakov’s Wish, performance for video, Centre for Creative Collaboration, London (Apr 2011).
Allegory of the Five Elements, live performance, Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL (Jun 2010).
Immolation Triptych, drawing performance, Drawing Field, University of the Arts, London (Sep 2009).
Kino Haiku, installation, Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design, London (Apr 2009),
Alba Lunedí, exhibition of performance documentation, Stephen Lawrence Gallery, University of Greenwich, London (Jan 2009).
Fall (An Allegory) I, performance for film, Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design, London (Apr 2008).
Fall (An Allegory) II, live performance, the Betsey Trotwood, London (Oct 2008). Alba Lunedí, site-specific performance, Bagno Vignoni, Italy (Nov 2008).
Publication
‘Nostaltopia’, artists’ pages in Stimulus? – Respond [special issue on Binary] (Fall 2010): 107–117. http://issuu.com/stimulusrespond/docs/binary
Dissemination 25
Conference papers and invited talks
‘Reflections on a New Nostalgia: Exploring Andrei Tarkovsky’s Film Image and its Expansion through Contemporary Art’. Presented at On the Image, the San Sebastián Film Festival, San Sebastián, Spain (Sep 2011).
‘Time, Place and Empathy: Material Poetics and the Film Image’. Presented at Sexuate Subjects: Politics, Poetics, Ethics, the Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL (Dec 2010).
‘Displaced Occupations: Revisiting the Atmospheric Space of Tarkovsky’s Nostalghia’. Presented at the Society for Cinema and Media Studies International Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA (Mar 2010).
‘Site and Generative Process in Gorchakov’s Wish’. Presented in the Theorising Practices/Practicing Theories lecture series, the Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL (Feb 2010).
‘Constructing Atmospheres: A Phenomenology of the Film Image and Its Relation to Place’. Presented at the Architecture and Phenomenology 2nd International Conference, Kyoto Seika University, Kyoto, Japan (Jun 2009). Published as part of conference proceedings.
‘Constructing Atmosphere: Andrei Tarkovsky’s Film Image’. Presented at the Greenwich Forum, University of Greenwich, London (Jan 2009).
20Sketch of sequence storyboard for Gorchakov’s Wish
20
26 Gorchakov’s Wish
Bibliography
Robert Bird (2008). Andrei Tarkovsky: Elements of Cinema. London: Reaktion. Rachel Duerden and Neil Fisher (2008). Dancing Off the Page: Integrating Performance,
Choreography Analysis and Notation/Documentation, Alton, Hampshire: Dance Books Ltd.
Nathan Dunne (2008). Tarkovsky, London: Black Dog Publishing. Roselee Goldberg (2007). Performa: New Visual Art Performance, New York:
Distributed Art Publishers. Gunnlaugur A. Jónsson and Thorkell Á. Óttarsson (2006). Through the Mirror:
Reflections on the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press. Nick Kaye (2004). Site Specific Art: Performance, Place, Documentation,
Oxford: Routledge. Miwon Kwon (2004). One Place After Another: Site Specific Art and Locational Identity,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Matthew Reason (2006). Documentation, Disappearance and the Representation
of Live Performance, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Jane Rendell (2007). Art and Architecture: A Place Between, London: I.B. Tauris. Andrei Tarkovsky (1986). Sculpting in Time, trans. Kitty Hunter-Blair, Austin: University
of Texas Press.
Dissemination / Bibliography 27
Bartlett Design Research Folios
Founding editor: Yeoryia Manolopoulou
Editors: Yeoryia Manolopoulou, Peg Rawes, Luis Rego
Content: © the authors
Graphic design: objectif
Typesetting: Axel Feldmann, Siaron Hughes,Alan Hayward
Proofreading: Wendy Toole
28 Gorchakov’s Wish
Bartlett Design Research Folios
Bloomby Alisa Andrasek and José Sanchez
House of Flagsby AY Architects
Montpelier Community Nurseryby AY Architects
Design for Londonby Peter Bishop
2EmmaToc / Writtle Callingby Matthew Butcher and Melissa Appleton
River Douglas Bridgeby DKFS Architects
Open Cinemaby Colin Fournier and Marysia Lewandowska
The ActiveHouseby Stephen Gage
Déjà vuby Penelope Haralambidou
Urban Collageby Christine Hawley
Hakka Cultural Parkby Christine Hawley, Abigail Ashton, Andrew Porter and Moyang Yang
House Refurbishment in Carmenaby Izaskun Chinchilla Architects
Refurbishment of Garcimuñoz Castleby Izaskun ChinchillaArchitects
Gorchakov’s Wishby Kreider + O’Leary
Video Shakkeiby Kreider + O’Leary
Megaframeby Dirk Krolikowski (Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners)
Seasons Through the Looking Glassby CJ Lim
Agropolisby mam
Alga(e)zeboby mam
Chong Qing Nan Lu Towersby mam
ProtoRobotic FOAMingby mam, Grymsdyke Farm and REX|LAB
Banyoles Old Town Refurbishmentby Miàs Architects
Torre Baró Apartment Buildingby Miàs Architects
Alzheimer’s Respite Centreby Níall McLaughlin Architects
Bishop Edward King Chapelby Níall McLaughlinArchitects
Block N15 Façade, Olympic Villageby Níall McLaughlin Architects
Regeneration of Birzeit Historic Centreby Palestine Regeneration Team
PerFORMby Protoarchitecture Lab
55/02by sixteen*(makers)
Envirographic and Techno Naturesby Smout Allen
Hydrological Infrastructuresby Smout Allen
Lunar Woodby Smout Allen
Universal Tea Machineby Smout Allen
British Exploratory Land Archiveby Smout Allenand Geoff Manaugh
101 Spinning Wardrobeby Storp Weber Architects
Blind Spot Houseby Storp Weber Architects
Green Belt Movement Teaching and Learning Pavilionby Patrick Weber
Modulating Light and Viewsby Patrick Weber