gom graziosi
DESCRIPTION
Gom GraziosiTRANSCRIPT
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM October 17, 2014
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 2 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
GOM Industrial 3D Measuring Techniques Measurement systems
Full-field 3D Digitizing
3D Shape and Dimension Inspection
Material Testing
Dynamic Component Testing
Full-field 3D Strain Measurement
Deformation Analysis in Sheet Metal Forming
Mobile Optical CMM
Dynamic 3D Analysis
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 3 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
GOM Industrial 3D Measuring Techniques Measurement systems
Material Testing 3D Coordinate Measurement Component Testing
ATOS
ATOS ScanBox
TRITOP
ARAMIS
PONTOS
PONTOS
ARAMIS
TRITOP ARGUS
Viewing and evaluation software
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 4 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
GOM Industrial 3D Measuring Techniques Measurement systems and results
Material Testing 3D Coordinate Measurement Component Testing
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 5 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
GOM Industrial 3D Measuring Techniques Company Overview
Benefits of optical metrology
Optical metrology enables and supports High information density Fast measurement and provision of results High degree of flexibility regarding task, place and parts High process safety
Optical metrology is used complementary or as an alternative to
3D CMM Checking fixtures, gauges Displacement- and acceleration sensors Extensometers Strain gauges
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations Webinar Overview
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 7 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Following topics will be discussed during the Application Webinar Verification of Numerical Simulations
Introduction in GOMs optical measuring systems
Determination of input parameters for numerical simulations
Verification procedures for numerical simulations
Including example applications in
Sheet metal forming Composite component testing Biomedical applications Fluid dynamics in the Automotive and Aerospace industry
Supported numerical simulation software packages and formats
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations Optical Measuring Techniques
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 9 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Example Applications
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 10 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 11 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations 3D-Shape Measurements
Reverse Engineering
FEA-Simulation
RevRev
CFD-Analysis
3D-Shape / STL-mesh
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 12 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Dynamic Deformation and Strain Analysis
FEA-Verification
Material Parameters
Shape / Displacement / Strain
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 13 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Boundary Conditions
Verification of Numerical Simulations Dynamic Deformation Analysis
Position / Displacement Dynamic
FEA-Verification
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 14 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Boundary Conditions
Verification of Numerical Simulations Static 3D-Coordinate Measurements and Deformation Analysis
Position / Displacement Static
FEA-Verification
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 15 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Sheet Metal Forming Analysis
FEA-Verification
Shape / Strain
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 16 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM System Applications
Results Application for FEA
ATOS Geometry / Shape 3D coordinates
Full field, static Input for Mesh Generation, Verification of Shape Spring-back, Thickness
ARAMIS Deformation Coordinates, Displacements, Strain
Full field, dynamic Material Parameter Verification of Shape, Displacement, Strain
ARGUS Forming Analysis Coordinates, Displacements, Strain
Full field, static
Verification of Shape, Displacement, Strain
PONTOS Deformation Coordinates, Displacements, Velocity
Point wise, dynamic Boundary conditions, Verification of Position, Displacements
TRITOP Deformation Coordinates, Displacements
Point wise, static
Boundary conditions, Verification of Position, Displacements, (Geometry)
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 18 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 19 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
Input Geometry
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 20 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Input geometry for numerical simulation
Numerical simulations are initially depending on 3D input geometries which are usually taken from construction models (CAD)
Due to differences in the 3D shape of CAD data sets and prototypes the reliability of numerical simulations are sometimes questionable
Thus the accuracy and reliability of numerical simulations can be improved using the real parts geometry
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 21 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Input geometry for numerical simulation
Numerical simulations are initially depending on 3D input geometries which are usually taken from construction models (CAD)
Due to differences in the 3D shape of CAD data sets and prototypes the reliability of numerical simulations are sometimes questionable
Thus the accuracy and reliability of numerical simulations can be improved using the real parts geometry
Generation of input geometries for numerical simulations
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 22 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Input geometry for numerical simulation
Numerical simulations are initially depending on 3D input geometries which are usually taken from construction models (CAD)
Due to differences in the 3D shape of CAD data sets and prototypes the reliability of numerical simulations are sometimes questionable
Thus the accuracy and reliability of numerical simulations can be improved using the real parts geometry
Generation of input geometries for numerical simulations
Section based reverse engineered CAD model from scan data
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 23 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Input geometry for numerical simulation
Numerical simulations are initially depending on 3D input geometries which are usually taken from construction models (CAD)
Due to differences in the 3D shape of CAD data sets and prototypes the reliability of numerical simulations are sometimes questionable
Thus the accuracy and reliability of numerical simulations can be improved using the real parts geometry
Generation of input geometries for numerical simulations
Computational fluid dynamics
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 24 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 25 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
Material Parameters
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 26 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Material parameter models as input for numerical simulation
The accuracy and reliability of numerical simulations are strongly depending on accurate material parameter models
With optical measuring techniques advanced material parameter models are developed utilizing different applications and testing procedures, such as
Tensile tests (quasi-static, high speed, etc.) Youngs modulus, R-value, N-value, Poisson ratio, etc.
Nakajima and bulge tests Forming limit curves and bi-axial yield curves
Torsion tests Bending tests Compression tests ...
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 27 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 28 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
Boundary Conditions
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 29 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Boundary conditions as input for numerical simulations
Numerical simulations strongly depend on the input of boundary conditions which represent manufacturing and testing conditions
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 30 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Boundary conditions as input for numerical simulations
Numerical simulations strongly depend on the input of boundary conditions which represent manufacturing and testing conditions
Inhomogeneous / unknown material behavior
E.g. Bones
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 31 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Boundary conditions as input for numerical simulations
Numerical simulations strongly depend on the input of boundary conditions which represent manufacturing and testing conditions
Inhomogeneous / unknown material behavior
E.g. Bones
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 32 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Boundary conditions as input for numerical simulations
Numerical simulations strongly depend on the input of boundary conditions which represent manufacturing and testing conditions
Inhomogeneous / unknown material behavior
E.g. Bones
PONTOS Measurement
FEA Input Geometry
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 33 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Boundary conditions as input for numerical simulations
Numerical simulations strongly depend on the input of boundary conditions which represent manufacturing and testing conditions
Inhomogeneous / unknown material behavior
E.g. Bones
FEA Result Meshes
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 34 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Determination of Input Parameters
Boundary conditions as input for numerical simulations
Numerical simulations strongly depend on the input of boundary conditions which represent manufacturing and testing conditions
Inhomogeneous / unknown material behavior
E.g. Bones
Process parameters
Tool behavior and press motion during stamping, cutting, etc.
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations Common Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 36 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
Point wise comparisons used for
Displacement transducers
Accelerometers
Strain gauges
Etc.
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 37 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
Point wise comparison
Section based comparison
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 38 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
Point wise comparison
Section based comparison Visual comparison of color plots
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 39 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Summary
No automatism, manual work
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 40 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Summary
No automatism, manual work
Due to user interaction very fault-prone Definition of points, sections, etc. in correct corresponding positions in FEA and measurement results
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 41 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Summary
No automatism, manual work
Due to user interaction very fault-prone Definition of points, sections, etc. in correct corresponding positions in FEA and measurement results
Limitations
Comparison only possible for local areas
Points Sections
Visual comparison of color plots
Inaccurate matching between FEA and measurement results
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedure using 3D Data
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 43 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 44 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
FE Verification
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 45 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 46 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 47 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
The result data set from the simulation need to be exported into the correct format from the numerical simulation software package
Direct export functions available in LS-Dyna, Pamstamp and Autoform
Export scripts are available for ANSYS, ABAQUS and NASTRAN
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 48 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
3D coordinate system alignment
Usually the 3D coordinate system is not aligned between results from numerical simulation and measurement
Manual pre-alignment
Best-fit alignment
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 49 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
3D coordinate system alignment
Surface Comparison
Deviations between FEA and measurement
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 50 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
3D coordinate system alignment
Surface Comparison
Deviations between FEA and measurement
With small enough deviation between the two surfaces the comparison of further result data, such as displacement and strain, is useful
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 51 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
3D coordinate system alignment
Surface Comparison
Result data comparison
Due to the issues that the nodes in the simulation are not at the same 3D positions as the measured 3D coordinates from the measurement a mapping of these two datasets is required to enable the direct comparison between FEA and measurement
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 52 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
3D coordinate system alignment
Surface Comparison
Result data comparison
Due to the issues that the nodes in the simulation are not at the same 3D positions as the measured 3D coordinates from the measurement a mapping of these two datasets is required to enable the direct comparison between FEA and measurement
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 53 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification procedure in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Import of result data set from numerical simulation
3D coordinate system alignment
Surface Comparison
Result data comparison
Further post-processing and reporting functions are available in ARAMIS for measurement and FEA data
Point evaluations Section Statistics Interpolation Filtering etc.
Verification of Numerical Simulations Verification Procedures
-
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application Examples Rotor Blade
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 55 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Test Specimen Carbon fiber rotor Blade length: 1540mm
Numerical simulation Linear simulation model Used to define positions for the application of strain gauges
ARAMIS is used in this application to
Verify the numerical simulation Verify strain gauge positions Replace strain gauges
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 56 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Positions of strain gauges
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 57 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test Full-field strain evaluation in X-direction of coordinate system
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 58 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test Full-field strain evaluation in X-direction of coordinate system
Strain gauge positions not in maximum strain areas
Non homogeneous strain distribution in root area of the rotor blade
Further measurement only focused on the root area
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 59 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Measurement of rotor blade root using a smaller measuring area to raise the local resolution for a better understanding of the local deformation behavior
Strain in X-direction
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 60 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Measurement of rotor blade root using a smaller measuring area to raise the local resolution for a better understanding of the local deformation behavior
Strain in X-direction
Non homogeneous local deformation behavior
Strain gauges were not applied on the areas of maximum deformation as predicted in the numerical simulation
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 61 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Strain gauge were applied to measure in X-direction
Comparison ARAMIS against strain gauges
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 62 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Verification of numerical simulation from rotor blade
Alignment
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
Initial Shape from FEA
incl. measurement results
(measurement projected to FEA surface)
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 63 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Verification of numerical simulation from rotor blade
Alignment Import FEA Strains
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
Result from ANSYS simulation Result from ARAMIS measurement
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 64 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Rotor blade bending test
Verification of numerical simulation from rotor blade
Difference between ANSYS simulation and ARAMIS measurement result
Verification of Numerical Simulations Application: Rotor Blade Bending test
Difference between Simulation (ANSYS) and measurement (ARAMIS)
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 65 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
FEA-comparison module
Included in ARAMIS and ARGUS
Comfortable alignment and mapping
Determination of full field deviations for Geometry Displacements Strains (Major, Minor, )
Easy and comfortable FEA verification including result evaluation and reporting
Verification of Numerical Simulations Summary
-
2-Frame Setup / Frame 2 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Page 66 Verification of Numerical Simulations GOM
Verification of Numerical Simulations Overview Finite Element Simulation
Input Geometry (Mesh)
Material Parameters
FE Verification
Boundary Conditions
Shape
Displacement
Strain
Position
FE Optimization
Meshing
-
Thank you for your attention
[email protected] www.gom.com