goldman sachs global energy conference 2018 · forward-looking statements 2 certain statements and...
TRANSCRIPT
GOLDMAN SACHS GLOBAL ENERGY CONFERENCE 2018
January 9, 2018
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
2
Certain statements and information in this presentation may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on us. While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, there can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we anticipate. Our forward-looking statements involve significant risks anduncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the volatility of commodity prices, product supply and demand, competition, access to and cost of capital, uncertainties about estimates of reserves and resource potential and the ability to add proved reserves in the future, the ability to assimilate acquisitions into our operations, the assumptions underlying production forecasts, our hedging strategy and results, the quality of technical data, environmental and weather risks, the ability to obtain environmental and other permits and the timing thereof, other government regulation or action, the costs and results of drilling and operations, the availability of equipment, services, resources and personnel required for RSP’s operating activities, access to and availability of transportation, processing and refining facilities, the financial strength of counterparties to RSP’s credit facility and derivative contracts and the purchasers of RSP’s production and third parties providing services to RSP, acts of war or terrorism and the fact that our capital program may exceed budgeted amounts.
For additional information regarding known material factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results, please see our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Existing and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
RSP PERMIAN OVERVIEW
~92,000 net acres across highly contiguous acreage
blocks in the core of the Midland and Delaware Basins
~6,000 net royalty acres in the Delaware Basin(1)
4,200+ net horizontal locations in drilling inventory
Current production of 65 MBoe/d(2)
Expect 2017 YoY production growth of 89% at mid-
point of guidance
Organizational focus on returns, efficiency and execution
Leading drill-bit F&D costs, reserve replacement
ratios and cash operating margins
Positive adj. net income at sub-$50 oil prices
3
CONTIGUOUS ACREAGE POSITION IN CORE OF PERMIAN BASIN(1)RSP OVERVIEW
(1) Net royalty acre defined as one surface acre leased at a 1/8th royalty.
(2) As of November 3, 2017.
(3) Based on Annualized 3Q17 Adjusted EBITDAX.
(4) Midland Basin locations based on range of base to upside case well spacing.
(5) As of 1/1/17, pro forma Silver Hill closing on 3/1/17.
Net
Acres
Net
Locations(4)
Proved
Reserves
(MMBoe)(5)
Resource
Potential
(BBoe)
Midland 46,700 1,750 - 2,890 200 1.0 - 1.6
Delaware 45,600 2,410 80 1.8
Total 92,300 4,200 - 5,300 280 2.8 - 3.4
Key Statistics (as of 9/30/17)
NYSE Symbol RSPP
Shares Outstanding 158.6 MM
Market Capitalization (share price as of 1/4/18)
$6.5 B
Enterprise Value $8.0 B
Net Debt / Adj. EBITDAX(3) 2.5x
CORPORATE UPDATE
RSP BUILDING SHAREHOLDER VALUE THROUGH THE CYCLES
5
HORIZONTAL INVENTORY EXPANSION SINCE IPO (GROSS LOCATIONS)
GROWTH IN SHAREHOLDER VALUE SINCE IPO
Production
(MBoe/d)
Quarterly
Annualized
EBITDAX
HZ Drilling
Locations
(Base Spacing)
Proved Reserves
(MMBoe)
Net Surface
Acreage
Enterprise Value
($ Billions)
Market Cap
($ Billions)
8.2
$194.8 (2)
1,169
52.2
~34,000
$1.4
$1.4
IPO
(Jan 2014)
58.9
$578.6
5,930 (3)
283.3 (3)
~92,300
$8.0 (4)
$6.5 (4)
Current (1)
(1) As of 3Q17, except where otherwise noted.
(2) 1Q14 annualized EBITDAX.
(3) As of YE 2016, pro forma for Silver Hill acquisition.
(4) Share price as of 1/4/18.
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18
Oil P
rice
RS
PP
Sto
ck P
rice
RSPP WTI Oil
-35%
+111%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
IPO YE 2014 YE 2015 YE 2016
Silver Hill Acquisition
PEER-LEADING PROFITABILITY
6
High quality assets + low cost operations = excellent corporate returns & profitability
Durability in periods of commodity price lows as well as significant leverage to commodity price upside
3Q17 OPERATING PROFIT PER BARREL (DEFINED BELOW)
$(15.00)
$(10.00)
$(5.00)
$-
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00Note: Average WTI crude oil price of $48.20 for 3Q17
Unhedged Revenue2-YR AVG.
PDP F&D (1) Operating Costs G&AOperating Profit
Better, more comparable
metric than DD&A which is
influenced by accounting
methodology and
write-downs
LOE
Production Taxes
Cash G&A
Non-Cash G&A
Source: Public filings.
Peer companies include: APA, APC, CDEV, CLR, CPE, CXO, DVN, EGN, EOG, FANG, HES, JAG, LPI, MRO, MTDR, MUR, NBL, NFX, OAS, PDCE, PE, PXD, WPX, XEC, XOG.
(1) 2015 and 2016 average PDP F&D Cost per Boe, as calculated by Seaport Global Securities.
TRACK RECORD OF DELIVERING SUPERIOR DEBT-ADJUSTED GROWTH
7
PRODUCTION GROWTH PER DEBT-ADJUSTED SHARE
Rank #2 amongst Permian-focused peer group for production growth per DAS from 2Q14 (PE IPO) to 3Q17
Source: Public filings.
Note: Peers include Callon, Cimarex, Concho, Diamondback, Energen, EOG, Laredo, Parsley, and Pioneer. Indexed to Q2 2014 (Parsley IPO).
207%
238%
161%
135% 140%
104%
129% 135%
109%
95%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017
RSPP Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 Peer 7 Peer 8 Peer 9
CAPITALIZATION AND LIQUIDITY SUMMARY
8
CAPITALIZATION TABLERecently increased borrowing base to $1.5 B from $1.1 B,
reiterating $900 MM Company-elected commitment under the
amended and restated credit facility ($2.5 B maximum lender
commitments)
Key financial covenants:
Maximum of 4.25x Total Debt / TTM EBITDAX
Minimum current ratio of 1.0x
Next redetermination April 2018
DEBT MATURITIES ($MM)
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
9/30/17 Balance Elected Commitment Borrowing Base Senior Notes
6.625%
5.25%
Elected Commitment
Borrowing Base
9/30/17 Balance
($ in millions) 9/30/2017
Cash $46
Revolving Credit Facility $345
6.625% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2022 700
5.25% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2025 450
Total Debt $1,495
Net Debt $1,449
Liquidity
Elected Commitment $900
Less: Borrowings & LCs (345)
Plus: Cash 46
Liquidity $601
Financial & Operating Statistics
Annualized 3Q17 Adjusted EBITDAX $578.6
3Q17 Avg. Daily Production (MBoe/d) 58.9
Credit Metrics
Net Debt / Adjusted EBITDAX 2.5x
Net Debt / Daily Production ($/Boe/d) $24,580
FULL YEAR 2017 GUIDANCE
9
COMMENTARYFULL YEAR 2017 GUIDANCE SUMMARY
2017E CAPEX SUMMARY
62%
4%
29%
5%
Midland D&C
Midland Infrastructure
Delaware D&C
Delaware Infrastructure
3Q17 YTD
Actuals2017 Guidance Range
Production
Avg. Daily Production (Boe/d) 52,864 53,000 - 57,000
% Oil 72% 71% - 73%
% Natural Gas 12% 11% - 13%
% NGLs 16% 15% - 17%
Income Statement ($/Boe)
LOE (incl. workovers) $5.09 $4.50 - $5.50
Gathering & Transportation $0.99 $1.10 - $1.40
Exploration Expenses $0.48 $0.40 - $0.60
Cash G&A $1.62 $1.25 - $1.75
Non-Cash G&A $0.88 $0.70 - $0.90
DD&A $14.03 $14.00 - $16.00
Prod. & Ad Val. (% Rev.) 5.9% 6.0% - 8.0%
Capital Expenditures ($MM)
Drilling & Completion $448.1 $575 - $625
Infrastructure & Other $38.7 $50 - $75
Total Development Capital $486.8 $625 - $700
Non-Operated (%) 10% 8% - 12%
Operated Completions
Gross Hz 54 70 - 74
Operated WI 91% 92%
Avg. LL (Midland / Delaware) 8,300’ / 5,600’ 8,500’ / 6,250’
Reiterated full year 2017 guidance ranges for production, unit
costs and capex
Revised completion guidance to 70-74 gross operated
horizontal completions, as compared to previous guidance of
80-85
Originally budgeted to run 3 frac crews for a portion of 2H17, instead elected to run 2 crews
Revised average operated working interest to 92% from 88%
Currently running 7 operated rigs (4 Midland, 3 Delaware)
Currently running 2 completion crews
RSP STRATEGY: RATE-OF-RETURN DRIVEN GROWTH
10
Emphasis on high rate of return, rather than growth for growth’s sake
During 2015 – 2016 oil price downturn RSP slowed drilling and opportunistically made acquisitions
Operated rigs dropped from 5 in 1Q15 to 2 in 1Q16, acquired $3.0B in high return Hz inventory
3
57
12
21
29
53
57
'11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17E '18E
ROBUST PRODUCTION GROWTH (MBOE/D)
Prelim
2018E
2017E
Increased to 7 Hz rigs from 6, averaged 2 full-time frac crews
Production growth (82% – 95%) over 2016
Slight cash flow outspend
Leverage ~2.5x(1)
Assuming $50+ oil price
Plan to add 1 completion crew and likely 1 Hz rig next year
30%+ production growth
Operating Cash Flow > Capex by YE 2018 at $50+
Leverage ~2.0x(1) by YE 2018 at $50+
(1) Leverage calculated as Total Debt / LQA EBITDAX.
SERVICES, SAND & WATER NEEDS SECURED THROUGH 2018+
11
Services
2018 pricing agreement in place with Halliburton for 2 dedicated frac crews
Entered into contract for 3rd full-time frac crew, to arrive mid-2Q18
Crews are flexible to move between basins
Currently evaluating addition of 8th drilling rig, foresee no issue procuring a high spec rig with a couple of
months notice
Sand
12-month contract secures sand required to execute 2018 development program
Expect to pump 75-100% regional sand from 2Q18 through end of year
Diversified exposure to multiple local mines, logistics/last mile delivery handled by third party
Significant cost savings vs. northern white sand
Water
Currently building out Delaware Basin fresh water sourcing system, which will pipe fresh water from
adjacent aquifer directly to RSP well sites, expect in-service in 2H18
All produced water in the Delaware Basin currently on pipe to company-owned disposal wells, sufficient
capacity to accommodate 2018 drilling program and beyond
ACTIVELY BUILDING HEDGE POSITION INTO 2018 AND 2019
12
Crude Oil (Bbl, $/Bbl) 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 2018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 2019
Three-Way Collars (1) 2,219,000 1,941,000 1,319,000 1,227,000 6,706,000
Ceiling
Floor
Short Put
$58.81
$46.96
$36.96
$59.07
$47.11
$37.11
$60.56
$47.79
$37.79
$60.96
$48.00
$38.00
$59.62
$47.36
$37.36
Costless Collars (1) 571,000 516,000 1,212,000 1,058,000 3,357,000 315,000 318,500 322,000 322,000 1,227,500
Ceiling
Floor
$60.19
$45.00
$60.20
$45.00
$60.10
$46.33
$60.11
$46.52
$60.13
$45.96
$55.99
$50.00
$55.99
$50.00
$55.99
$50.00
$55.99
$50.00
$55.99
$50.00
Swaps (1) 322,000 322,000 644,000 315,000 318,500 322,000 322,000 1,277,500
Swap Price $55.77 $55.77 $55.77 $53.42 $53.42 $53.42 $53.42 $53.42
Total Hedge
Weighted Average Floor (2)
2,790,000
$46.56
2,457,000
$46.67
2,853,000
$48.07
2,607,000
$48.36
10,707,000
$47.42
630,000
$51.71
637,000
$51.71
644,000
$51.71
644,000
$51.71
2,555,000
$51.71
Mid-Cush Differential Swaps (3) 1,918,000 2,002,000 2,024,000 2,024,000 7,968,000 270,000 273,000 276,000 276,000 1,095,000
Weighted Average Swap ($0.58) ($0.57) ($0.57) ($0.57) ($0.57) ($0.27) ($0.27) ($0.27) ($0.27) ($0.27)
___________________________(1) The crude oil derivative contracts are settled based on the arithmetic average of the closing settlement price for the front month contract NYMEX price of West Texas Intermediate Light Sweet Crude during the relevant period.(2) Weighted average floor assumes the long put in three way collars and reflects the impact of premiums paid.(3) The Mid-Cush oil derivative contracts are settled based on the arithmetic average of the Argus daily price for WTI Midland and the arithmetic average of the Argus daily price for WTI Formula Basis.
HEDGE CONTRACT DETAIL
RSP continuing to protect > $45 floor into 2018 & 2019
RSP OWNERSHIP UPDATE
13
Management and Board hold ~14% of outstanding
shares (>$750 MM of value) compared to <5% average
insider ownership of E&P SMID-Caps
Management compensation is heavily weighted (>2/3rds)
towards stock, further aligning objectives
½ of stock awards are performance shares earned based
on relative total shareholder return
Cash bonus amounts are tied to metrics that measure
overall financial performance of the Company, not
absolute growth metrics, M&A success etc.
(1) As of form 13-G filed on 10/2/17.
Upon closing of the Silver Hill transaction, Silver Hill owners
received 31 MM shares of RSP stock, subject to certain
escrow holdbacks
Kayne Anderson, Silver Hill’s largest shareholder, became
RSP’s largest shareholder
Through a block trade executed in May 2017 and
subsequent open market sales and distributions, Kayne
Anderson’s beneficial ownership has dropped from 18%
to ~1% of outstanding shares(1)
Cash Bonus Metrics
2016 2017
LOE / Boe LOE / Boe
Cash G&A / Boe Cash G&A / Boe
F&D Cost / Boe F&D Cost / Boe
Leverage Multiple Capex / Production Added
Recycle Ratio Production per Debt-Adjusted
Share Growth
RSP MANAGEMENT AND BOARD ARE STRONGLY ALIGNED WITH SHAREHOLDERS
KAYNE ANDERSON AND OTHER SILVER HILL SHAREHOLDERS’ OWNERSHIP IN RSP HAS BEEN DRAMATICALLY REDUCED
OPERATIONS UPDATE
DRILLING & COMPLETIONS UPDATE
15
During 3Q17, RSP drilled 26 and completed 22
operated HZ wells
18 Midland, 4 Delaware completions
Expect to drill 26-28 and complete 16-20 in
4Q17
26 operated DUCs as of 9/30/17, estimate 32-
38 as of YE 2017
2017 OPERATED DRILLING & COMPLETION ACTIVITY
2017 PLANNED COMPLETION ACTIVITY BY HORIZON
WA
WBLS
MS
WA
WXYWB
BSMidland
Delaware
11
69
26
54
16
32
28
20
38
YE 2016ADUCs
YTD 4Q YTD 4Q YE 2017EDUCsDrilling Completions
PRODUCTION PROFILE
28
33
38
43
48
53
58
63
68
MB
oe/d
MBoe/d Q1 Q2 Q3 Current
Avg. Daily Production 45.2 54.3 58.9 ~65
Closing of
SHEP II
transaction
MIDLAND BASIN WELL PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
MIDLAND BASIN WELL PERFORMANCE BY VINTAGE
2017 wells drilled (through October) outperforming 2014 / 2015 / 2016 vintage wells
16
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Cum
l. M
Boe
Days
2014 & 2015 Avg. 2016 Avg. 2017 Avg.
Avg. LL: 7,400’
Avg. LL: 7,100’
Avg. LL: 8,300’
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2014 2015 2016 2017
AVG. WELL SPACING (FEET) @ FIRST PRODUCTION
Avg. distance
decreased >28%
Note: Includes all zones.
MIDLAND BASIN UPDATE
17
With addition of 2nd Halliburton frac crew in 3Q17, able to
simultaneously frac 2, 2-well pads
Reduced downtime for offset producers
Increased complexity/efficiency of stimulations
Completed several wells in 3Q17 with higher percentage of
100 mesh sand
Early results are outstanding (ST 347 WA wells, Woody 3-
46 WB well, Keystone WA and LS wells)
Keystone West Side area wells continue to impress
Average cumulative production for 3 well pad is ~100
MBoe in less than 90 days (WA well produced 125 MBoe in
same time period)
Next two wells in Spanish Trail WA pattern with 8 wells drilled
across the section have average cumulative production of 100
MBoe in 75 days (100% 100 mesh)
Implemented several gas lift pilots, testing application in
different areas/reservoirs
Strong results; plan to increase usage, benefiting LOE
MIDLAND BASIN LOCATOR MAP
Keystone 1007 WA (LL: 9,800’)IP30: 2,220 Boe/d (227 Boe/d / 1k’), 90% oil
Keystone 1006 LLS (LL: 9,800’)IP30: 1,600 Boe/d (163 Boe/d / 1k’), 88% oil
Keystone 1005 ULS (LL: 9,750’)IP30: 1,270 Boe/d (130 Boe/d / 1k’), 85% oil
Woody 3-46 WB (LL: 7,600’) IP30:
1,520 Boe/d (200 Boe/d / 1k’), 80% oil
Spanish Trail 347 01 WA (LL: 6,500’) IP30: 1,400 Boe/d (215 Boe/d / 1k’), 72% oil
Spanish Trail 347 02 WA (LL: 6,500’) IP30: 1,850 Boe/d (285 Boe/d / 1k’), 82% oil
Calverley 22 27 UWA (LL: 10,250’)170 Day Cuml: 175 MBoe, 72% oil
Calverley 22 27 LWA (LL: 10,250’) 170 Day Cuml: 170 MBoe, 71% oil
Calverley 22 27 UWB (LL: 7,630’) 170 Day Cuml: 135 MBoe, 60% oil
Calverley 22 27 LWB (LL: 7,630’) 170 Day Cuml: 125 MBoe, 61% oil
MIDLAND BASIN 2018 PLANS
18
Run 4 rigs on average, drilling almost entirely in full
development mode
Focus on highest return leases
Initiate development of Glass Ranch leases where RSP
has higher net revenue interest
Continue with full development sequence across West Side
area based on excellent recent step-out results in the WA
Continue to pair 2-well pads and complete 4 wells at once
when possible
Limited additional infrastructure requirements
MIDLAND BASIN LOCATOR MAP
Denotes area with significant 2018 drilling activity
DELAWARE BASIN WELL PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
DELAWARE BASIN WELL PERFORMANCE BY VINTAGE
2017 wells drilled (through October) outperforming 2015 / 2016 vintage wells
19
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Cum
l. M
Boe
2015 Avg. 2016 Avg. 2017 Avg.
Avg. LL: 4,700’
Avg. LL: 5,100’
Avg. LL: 6,100’
Note: Includes all zones.
DELAWARE BASIN UPDATE
20
First 3BS well, Rudd Draw 29 03 01H, completed on southern
end of acreage with excellent early results
7-day IP: 1,428 Boe/d (79% oil)
Current rate: 1,822 Boe/d (73% oil), still cleaning up at
>2,500 psi
8 other operated 3BS HZ wells across acreage
First RSP drilled & completed WB well brought online during
3Q17, strong results with flat decline profile
First well completed with 100% regional sand
Now have WB well results on far east and far west side of
acreage block
Recently returned Bullet well to production; came back
on with an initial flush rate of >1,000 Bo/d, has since
declined but is stabilizing after ~30 days around 560
Boe/d (64% oil)
First pass of Delaware 3D looks very high quality, showing
consistent presence of thick Wolfcamp and Bone Spring
section throughout eastern portion of acreage position
Continuing to test variations to stimulation design and flowback
methods
In early stages of data gathering, will likely result in
different optimized designs for different geographic areas
and formations
Modified Delaware casing design, evaluating from cost/benefit
perspective
Build-out of fresh water distribution system underway
DELAWARE BASIN LOCATOR MAP
Rudd Draw 26 21 XY (LL: 6,700’)
275 Day Cuml: 450 MBoe, 73% oil
Ludeman D 2105 LWA (LL: 4,750’)
170 Day Cuml: 200 MBoe, 72% oil
Ludeman A 603 WB (LL: 4,830’)IP30: 935 Boe/d (194 Boe/d / 1k’), 77% oil
Bullet 27 11 2H WB
Rudd Draw 29 03 01H 3BS (LL: 4,440’)IP7: 1,428 Boe/d (322 Boe/d / 1k’), 79% oil
DELAWARE BASIN 2018 PLANS
21
Run 3 rigs minimum, with likelihood of 4th
Move majority of drilling to multi-well pads, reducing well
costs
Previously ~40%, going forward ~85%
Focus will remain in Wolfcamp A, pending additional
results could see increasing allocation to Bone Spring
intervals and Wolfcamp B
Dedicate one rig to Rudd Draw area - highly prolific well
results to date and above average net revenue interest
Continue to test a couple of additional targets within pay
column
With likely 4th rig, drill delineation and extension wells on
east side where new 3D seismic (and offset wells) shows
promising potential – pending full interpretation of 3D
Continue science projects to further refine landing targets,
flowback methodology and completion designs
Implement new fresh water distribution system which will
provide surety of supply, on-time delivery and reduced D&C
costs Denotes areas with significant 2018 drilling activity
DELAWARE BASIN LOCATOR MAP
DELAWARE BASIN CROSS-SECTION (LOVING & WINKLER COUNTIES)
22
West-to-east seismic cross-section across RSP’s acreage position based on newly acquired 3D data
Confirms Central Basin Platform is well East of RSP’s Winkler County position
Avalon / 1st Bone Springs
2nd/3rd Bone Springs
T/Wolfcamp
WC A
WC D
WC C
WC B X/Y SAND
WINKLERLOVING
Atoka High
Carbonate % Increases
W
E
T/ATOKA
1,700’
1,300’
550’
475’
500’
2,700’
1,700’
1,400’
400’
450’
400’
1,400’
W E
23
• Continued focus on corporate-level returns and capital efficiency, not growth for growth’s sake
• Ability to achieve 30%+ production growth in 2018 in $50+ oil price environment, reaching cash flow neutrality by end of year
• Maintain strong balance sheet and liquidity through periods of commodity price volatility
• RSP flexible to accelerate or decelerate in response to commodity prices & service costs
FUTURE OUTLOOK
APPENDIX
MIDLAND BASIN INVENTORY
25
CURRENT SPACING ASSUMPTIONS
Base Spacing Mid - Upside Spacing
Formation Avg. Wells/Section Wells/Section
Clearfork 5 6 – 7
Middle Spraberry 11 14– 16
Jo Mill 5 6 – 7
Lower Spraberry 11 14– 20
Wolfcamp A 6 7– 10
Wolfcamp B 6 7– 9
Wolfcamp C 5 6 – 7
Wolfcamp D 5 6 – 7
BASE SPACING LOCATIONS UPSIDE SPACING LOCATIONS
2,700 Gross Locations
1,750 Net Locations
3,550 – 4,540 Gross Locations
2,260 – 2,890 Net Locations
~60% of drilling in 2018 targeting “platinum” inventory with
expected IRR > 50% at $50 oil
50% estimated weighted average return for 2018 drilling
program
Numerous spacing pilots ongoing
Spacing assumptions vary by area and formation
Increased well density as much as 20% over YE 2015 levels
in select areas based on performance to date
Remain conservative but optimistic across other areas where
Base Spacing maintained
Clear Fork4%
Middle Spraberry
22%
Jo Mill10%
Lower Spraberry
30%
Wolfcamp A11%
Wolfcamp B11%
Wolfcamp D11%
Clear Fork5%
Middle Spraberry
24%
Jo Mill11%
Lower Spraberry
25%
Wolfcamp A12%
Wolfcamp B11%
Wolfcamp D12%
CURRENT SPACING ASSUMPTIONS
Base Spacing (Avg. Wells/Section)
Formation West / Central East
Avalon 8 6
1st Bone Spring 3 0
2nd Bone Spring 8 0
3rd Bone Spring 3 0
Wolfcamp XY 6 0
Wolfcamp A 6 6
Wolfcamp B 6 6
Wolfcamp C 6 6
Wolfcamp D 6 6
26
DELAWARE BASIN INVENTORY
WEST & CENTRAL BASE SPACING LOCATIONS EAST BASE SPACING LOCATIONS
3,580 Gross Locations
1,860 Net Locations
1,010 Gross Locations
550 Net Locations
~65% of drilling in 2018 targeting “platinum” inventory with
expected IRR > 50% at $50 oil
65% estimated weighted average return for 2018 drilling
program
Significant upside to inventory pending results of future spacing
tests
Avalon16%
1st BS6%
2nd BS16%
3rd BS6%Wolfcamp
XY11%
Wolfcamp A11%
Wolfcamp B12%
Wolfcamp C12%
Wolfcamp D12%
Avalon20%
Wolfcamp A20%
Wolfcamp B20%
Wolfcamp C20%
Wolfcamp D20%
3Q17 FINANCIAL RESULTS
27
3Q17 3Q16 2Q17 3Q17 3Q16 2Q17
Avg. Daily Production Cash Op. Exp. ($/Boe)
Oil (MBbl/d) 41.4 21.6 38.8 LOE $5.18 $4.67 $4.72
Gas (MMcf/d) 47.2 18.7 40.1 G&T 0.98 0.51 1.12
NGL (MBbl/d) 9.7 5.0 8.9 Prod. Taxes 2.45 2.14 2.05
Total (MBoe/d) 58.9 29.8 54.3 Cash G&A 1.43 2.04 1.60
Total Cash Operating Exp. $10.04 $9.36 $9.49
Pricing Non-Cash/Other Exp. ($/Boe)
Average NYMEX Oil ($/Bbl) $48.20 $44.94 $48.28 Stock Comp G&A $0.81 $1.20 $0.90
Realized Price (Incl. Hedges) DD&A 13.54 18.27 13.77
Oil ($/Bbl) $45.16 $41.46 $45.27 Exploration 0.28 0.13 0.58
Gas ($/Mcf) 2.24 2.27 2.70 Interest Expense 3.98 4.80 3.94
NGL ($/Bbl) 19.52 10.82 15.88 Other (1) (0.18) (0.07) (0.09)
Total ($/Boe) $36.72 $33.37 $36.88 Total Non-Cash / Other Exp.(2) $18.43 $24.33 $19.10
Financial Results ($MM) Capital Expenditures ($MM)
Total Revenues $201.7 $93.6 $183.1 D&C $168.9 $65.3 $168.7
Net Income $21.3 $1.0 $31.1 Infrastructure and Other 22.7 7.9 10.9
Adj. EBITDAX $144.7 $65.7 $135.5 Total Development Capex $191.6 $73.2 179.6
Adj. Net Income (Loss) $28.2 ($0.8) $26.0
(1) Includes Other income net of Asset retirement obligation accretion expense.
(2) Excludes non-recurring non-cash expenses.
ADJUSTED EBITDAX AND ADJUSTED NET INCOME RECONCILIATION
28
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDAX
(in thousands)
Net income
Interest expense
Income tax expense (benefit)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
Asset retirement obligation accretion
Exploration
Acquisition costs
Impairments
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments
Stock-based compensation, net
Other income, net
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
(in thousands)
Net income
Acquisition costs
Impairments
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments
Other income, net
Income tax expense (benefit) for above items
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) 28,187$ (764)$ 26,048$
(11,827) (3,086) 2,744
(1,106) (310) (589)
705 971 5,312
19,059 676 (12,910)
21,326$ 985$ 31,090$
30 - 401
2017 2016 2017
Three Months Ended September 30,
Adjusted EBITDAX 144,662$ 65,732$ 135,450$
Three Months Ended June 30,
4,361 3,272 4,443
(1,106) (310) (589)
19,059 676 (12,910)
30 - 401
705 971 5,312
151 118 150
1,497 359 2,869
3,678 (3,507) 17,072
73,408 50,022 68,104
21,326$ 985$ 31,090$
21,553 13,146 19,508
Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017
Three Months Ended June 30,
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
29
Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We define Adjusted EBITDAX as oil and gas revenues including net cash receipts (payments) on settled derivative instruments and premiums paid on put options
that settled during the period, less lease operating expenses, production and ad valorem taxes, and general and administrative expenses excluding stock based
compensation. Adjusted net income deducts from Adjusted EBITDAX depreciation, depletion, and amortization, accretion on asset retirement obligations,
exploration expenses, interest expense, stock-based compensation and adjusted income tax expense.
Management believes Adjusted EBITDAX and adjusted net income are useful because they allow us to more effectively evaluate our operating performance and
compare the results of our operations from period to period without regard to our financing methods or capital structure. We exclude the items listed above in arriving
at Adjusted EBITDAX and adjusted net income because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon
accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Adjusted EBITDAX and adjusted net income
should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indicator of our operating
performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDAX and adjusted net income are significant components in understanding and assessing a
company's financial performance, such as a company's cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are
components of Adjusted EBITDAX. Our computations of Adjusted EBITDAX and adjusted net income may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of
other companies.
Certain Reserve Information
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors: The SEC prohibits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, from disclosing estimates of oil or gas resources other
than “reserves,” as that term is defined by the SEC. This presentation discloses estimates of quantities of oil and gas using certain terms, such as “resource
potential,” “net recoverable resource potential,” “resource base,” “estimated ultimate recovery,” “EUR” or other descriptions of volumes of reserves, which terms
include quantities of oil and gas that may not meet the SEC’s definitions of proved, probable and possible reserves, and which the SEC’s guidelines strictly prohibit
the Company from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are
subject to substantially greater risk of being recovered by the Company. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosures in the Company’s periodic
filings with the SEC. Such filings are available from the Company at 3141 Hood Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75219, Attention: Investor Relations, and the
Company’s website at www.rsppermian.com. These filings also can be obtained from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.