gm-08-030-02.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
1/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
This is a Controlled Document that complies with
Wesfarmers Chemicals, Energy & Fertilisers formatting and Quality Control standards.Please check that this is the latest available version before use.
Title: HAZOP PROCESS
Number: GM-08-030-02
Version Number: 15.0
Date Revised: 08 May 2013
Owner: Harish Chopra
Authoriser: Manoj Thakur
Reasons for Creating
or AmendingDocument
New Owner
New Authoriser
Full Review of Document
Actual Change Details: Document reviewed and revised. Owner and authoriser changed.
Sections 5.1 to 5.5 changes made from SiteSafe to Cintellate plus
changes on how to action HAZOP's in Cintellate
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
2/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURE 1 -HAZOPPROCESS FLOW CHART ............................................................................................. 3
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 42. HAZOP PREPARATION ........................................................................................................ 4
2.1 HAZOP LEADER ................................................................................................................. 42.2 SELECTION OF HAZOP STUDY TEAM MEMBERS ...................................................... 52.3 OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................. 72.4 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR HAZOP STUDY ......................................................... 7
3. HAZOP TERMINOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 83.1 SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................... 83.2 DESIGN INTENT ................................................................................................................. 83.3 HAZOP GUIDE WORDS ..................................................................................................... 83.4 HAZOP STUDY RECORD .................................................................................................. 83.5 RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 9
4. HAZOP MEETING PROCEDURE ...................................................................................... 105. HAZOP FOLLOW UP ACTIONS ........................................................................................ 11
5.1 ACTION PROGRESS MANAGEMENT ........................................................................... 115.2 FOLLOW UP ...................................................................................................................... 125.3 ACTION COMPLETION ................................................................................................... 135.4 CINTELLATE REPORTING ............................................................................................. 135.5 ALTERNATIVE HAZOP ACTION TRACKING PROCEDURE ..................................... 13
6. HAZOP CLOSURE ................................................................................................................ 156.1 CLOSE-OUT ....................................................................................................................... 156.2 CLOSE OUT MEETING .................................................................................................... 15
7. DOCUMENTATION .............................................................................................................. 158. RECORD KEEPING TABLE ............ ............. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............ ...... 16APPENDIX 1 - RISK ASSESSMENT TABLES ............................................................................. 17APPENDIX 2 - HAZARD STUDY CARDS ............ ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ....... 18
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
3/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
No
Yes
Selectguideword
eg High Flow
Select line
Can HighFlow
occur?
Reviews plannedsafeguards and
informally assess risk
Agree anyfurther actions
on this item
Yes
Is cost ofchanges
justified?
No
Agree and recordsuggested changesto plant design or
operation which willreduce risk to
acceptable level
Agree further actionsafter HAZOP toreduce risk to
acceptable levelGo to next
Guide Word
Areconsequencespotentially very
serious?
Review plannedsafeguards and carry out
Risk Assessment. For
events with extremeconsequences, a further
action may be recorded toconsider a SIL, LOPA orother process safety riskstudy outside the HAZOP
meeting
Yes
Aresafeguardsadequate?
No
No
Yes
No
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
4/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
1. INTRODUCTION
A Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study is a structured and systematic examination of aplanned or existing process or operation in order to identify and evaluate problems that mayrepresent a risk to personnel or equipment, or prevent efficient operation. A HAZOP is aqualitative technique based on "guide words" and is carried out by a multi-disciplinary team (theHAZOP Team) during one or more meetings.
This Guide Manual defines the principles for conducting a HAZOP study, the tools that will beused and the documentation that will be produced. It provides guidance on the information thatis required to prepare for and run a HAZOP study.
This Guide Manual does not define when a HAZOP study should be carried out. In the case ofmodifications, this is defined in Engineering Modification (GM-05-050-01). A HAZOP study isa mandatory requirement for any new plant and for modifications to "critical" plant items asdefined in the Modification Procedure.
A HAZOP is a design verification process. It should not be used as a design developmentprocess. The HAZOP should be performed at the stage in the design process when allpreliminary engineering is complete and the basic design has been fixed. This includes completeprocess design, process flow diagrams, P&IDs, plant and equipment layout, operatingphilosophy, control and instrumentation philosophy, utilities requirements, specification andselection of major equipment items, protection systems, start up and shutdown systems.
A HAZOP may be conducted on an existing facility to identify modifications that should beimplemented to reduce risk and operability problems.
The HAZOP process is most suited to analysis of piping systems and can extend to solidmaterials handling systems. For solid material handling projects that do not involve any pipingsystems, a design review as detailed in Engineering Project Design Review (EP-08-030-19)should be carried out instead of a HAZOP.
2. HAZOP PREPARATION
It is the responsibility of the Responsible Officer to initiate the HAZOP study where the project
or modification meets the criteria defined in Engineering Modification (GM-05-050-01).
2.1 HAZOP LEADER
The Responsible Officer will first appoint an independent HAZOP Leader to act as theChairperson for the HAZOP meetings. The HAZOP Leader must be trained in HAZOPmethodology and have successfully completed a suitably recognised HAZOP Leader Course or
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
5/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
4. Daniel Massie5. Eli Knudsen
6. Kim Eng
7. Peter Hein
8. Phillip Brown
9. Sakar
10. Scott Olsen
11. Yvonne Darlow
12. Deepak Gupta13. Justin Manganaro
14. Jamal Fozdar
15. Vinod Verma
Note: If there is no CSBP HAZOP Leader available from within CSBP, an externalChairperson who is a qualified HAZOP Leader with experience in chemicalindustries may be engaged.
2.2 SELECTION OF HAZOP STUDY TEAM MEMBERS
HAZOP studies will be conducted using a team approach, with a minimum of four members.The Responsible Officer together with the HAZOP Leader will select the HAZOP teammembers to achieve the spread of knowledge and skills required for the particular project, andmay include:
1. Representative of the customer
2. A person with Process knowledge
3. A person with Safety knowledge4. A person with Environmental knowledge
5. A person with operating and/or maintenance experience in comparableenvironment
6. A person with Engineering/Design knowledge
7. Secretary
How this knowledge and experience is represented in the team depends on the size and nature ofthe change being reviewed by the HAZOP. As a guide in team member selection for projects of
different sizes, refer to the table below. However, the final selection will be at the discretion ofthe HAZOP Leader and/or the responsible officer having regard for potential risk.
It is expected (but not essential) that the people selected as members of the HAZOP team willalready have completed a suitably recognised HAZOP Team Member training course, orequivalent experience, and have a good understanding of the HAZOP process.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
6/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
At least one process knowledge representative in the HAZOP team must be of sufficientexperience having sound knowledge and understanding of the process fundamentals as well aspossess high abstract reasoning capabilities. This HAZOP team member is usually the mostexperienced resident process engineer responsible for the plant.
When requested by the HAZOP leader, the HAZOP leader can be supported by the processknowledge representative in the team.
TEAM MEMBERSHIP
SMALL PROJECT
for example
Minor Alteration
MEDIUM PROJECT
for example
Replacing Sections of Plant
LARGE PROJECT
for example
New Plant or Replacing
more than 50% of a Plant
Independent Chairperson Independent Chairperson External Chairperson
Process Designers
Design Engineer
Project Engineer/PlantEngineer (i.e., ResponsibleOfficer)
Project Engineer/PlantEngineer (i.e. ResponsibleOfficer)
Responsible Officer/SeniorProject Engineer
Plant Process Engineer orManufacture Team Leader
Plant Process Engineer orManufacture Team Leader
Plant Process Engineer
Manufacture Teamrepresentative
Manufacture Teamrepresentative/MaintenanceTeam representative
Manufacture Teamrepresentative/MaintenanceTeam representative
OSH Advisor andEnvironmental Advisor
OSH Advisor andEnvironmental Advisor
Others as required: Others as required: Others as required:
Electrical/Instrumentrepresentative
Electrical/Instrumentrepresentative
Electrical/Instrumentrepresentative
OSH Advisor andEnvironmental Advisor
Improvement Facilitator Improvement Facilitator
Improvement Facilitator Equipment vendorrepresentative
Maintenance Teamrepresentative
Other specialist knowledge. Other specialist knowledge
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
7/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
2.3 OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES
The Responsible Officer is responsible for the following HAZOP study arrangements:
a. Organising meeting dates, venue and notices to the attendees
b. Layout of venue and supply of stationery and other resources for the meeting
c. Provision of information required for the HAZOP study (refer to Section 2.4)
d. Close out meeting date, venue and notice to the attendees.
2.4 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR HAZOP STUDY
The following information should be assembled by the Responsible Officer and the HAZOPLeader before the HAZOP study team commences work.
a. ESSENTIAL ITEMS
1. Functionally complete P & ID for the process
2. System design philosophy and process description
b. DESIRABLE ITEMS
1. Plot plans or layouts
2. Process flow diagrams
3. Piping class specifications
4. Equipment data sheets and purchase specifications
5. Vessel inventories
6. Relief valve specifications
7. Start up and emergency shut-down procedures
8. Emergency depressurising system functions
9. Electrical area classification
10. Standards used
11. Procedures - operating and maintenance as applicable
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
8/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
3. HAZOP TERMINOLOGY
3.1 SYSTEM
A System is a specific location or logical part of the process or operation in which possibledeviations from the design intent are to be evaluated. Examples might be a heat exchanger,vessel, pump, compressor and interconnecting pipeline or group of lines. Systems should beprogressively identified on the P&ID as the HAZOP study proceeds.
3.2 DESIGN INTENT
The design intent is a description of how the process is expected to behave at the system beingstudied. This is qualitatively described as an activity eg feed, reaction, transfer, heating, andquantitatively in process parameters such as pressure, temperature, flow rate.
3.3 HAZOP GUIDE WORDS
All HAZOP studies will be conducted using the HAZOP Study Cards included in Appendix 2.These HAZOP Study Cards provide guide words and prompts for a range of deviations fromacceptable conditions, and each of these must be individually considered by the HAZOP teamfor each System. This review is done "line by line" by selecting a line or System off the P&IDand reviewing each of the guide words on the HAZOP Study Cards for that System. When allguide words have been reviewed for a particular line or System, the process is repeated for thenext line or System selected off the P&ID.
3.4 HAZOP STUDY RECORD
HAZOP Study Record form SF1309 is used to create a historic record of the HAZOP Study.Details of discussions, decisions taken, risk assessments made and further actions recommendedduring evaluation of each of the HAZOP Study Cards will be progressively recorded by theHAZOP Secretary on the HAZOP Study Record form. Discussions on each of the followingitems should be recorded for each guide word.
3.4.1 Deviation
A deviation is a way in which the process conditions may depart from the design intent assuggested by each guide word, eg high pressure.
3.4.2 Cause
As each guide word is considered, if it is determined that a deviation, eg high pressure, could
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
9/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
hazards and operability problems. Several consequences may follow from one cause. Oneconsequence can have several causes.
Each cause and consequence scenario identified should be recorded in the HAZOP StudyRecord form and must be comprehensive, realistic and sequential. eg "Closed valve in pumpdischarge causes high pressure which leads to pipe rupture which results in a loss of 20 kg ofammonia to atmosphere before a shut off valve closes".
3.4.4 Safeguards
Safeguards are facilities, processes or procedures that help to reduce the likelihood or frequencyof the deviation, or to mitigate its consequences. Examples of safeguards include the following.
a. procedures to define what actions to take in the event of a deviation
b. increased frequency of inspection, servicing or calibration of critical items
c. facilities that draw attention to the deviation (eg indicators and alarms to inform
operators so that they can make the process safe)
d. facilities that automatically compensate for the deviation (eg an automatic controlsystem, usually an integrated part of the process control)
e. facilities that prevent the deviation from occurring (eg excess flow valve)
f. facilities that prevent further escalation of the deviation (eg by total trip of the activity orprocess by a safety interlock, control system, or emergency shutdown (ESD) system)
g. facilities that relieve the process from a hazardous deviation (eg pressure safety valve(PSV) and vent systems)
As each cause and consequence scenario is identified, planned safeguards should be reviewed todetermine if they are adequate to either prevent the deviation or to protect the System if thedeviation occurs. Any decision on the adequacy of the safeguards should take into considerationthe magnitude of the potential consequences and the likelihood of the event occurring with allthe planned safeguards in place. This is reflected in the risk assessment as below.
Each scenario will usually have more than a single layer of protection. For high risk deviations,it is useful to review each of the layers of protection before determining the adequacy of thesafeguards.
3.4.5 Recommendations
If the HAZOP Team recommends that additional safeguards or changes to the design should be
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
10/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
An initial informal risk assessment should be carried out on each cause - consequence scenariobased on the inherent risk in the unprotected state. The Risk Matrix included in Appendix 1should be used as a guide. The risk should then be re-assessed taking into consideration theplanned safeguards and risk reduction measures.
For less important risks, the need for further action can be based on the experience andjudgement of the HAZOP Study Team.
For high risk scenarios, several layers of protection will usually be necessary to reduce the risk
to an acceptable level. If the HAZOP team agrees that, so long as the planned safeguards are inplace, the risk of an unwanted event occurring is reduced to an acceptable level, then no furtheraction is required.
For extreme risk scenarios, the adequacy of safeguards and the need for further action should bequantitatively assessed using higher level risk assessment techniques such as Layer ofProtection Analysis (LOPA), or Safety Integrity Level (SIL) analysis.
The risk assessment process and outcome should be recorded on the HAZOP Study Record
form against each item.
4. HAZOP MEETING PROCEDURE
At the HAZOP meeting, the HAZOP Leader will act as Chairperson to lead the team througheach of the following steps.
a. Introduce the project
1. Ensure all team members are familiar with the HAZOP process2. Define the project for the team
3. Review the proposed process or modification using the Process andInstrumentation Diagram (P&ID) and describe its operation
4. On the P&ID, divide the process to be studied into logical Systems.
Note: Modifications that are prone to the potential of expected two phase flow orcondensation effects (eg. modifications to steam or chemical vapour systems) will be
highlighted during the introduction.
b. Carry out HAZOP Study
1. Select a particular System for detailed review and describe the design intentfor that System.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
11/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
8. Evaluate if the proposed safeguards adequately reduce the risk to anacceptable level and if not, suggest further actions having regard to theconsequences and the safeguards already proposed
9. Repeat procedure from step (a) above for the next System.
10. Progressively complete HAZOP Study Record form SF1309 includingrecording of further actions.
Note: Modifications mustbe asessed for impact during a variety of plant conditions
(ie. start up, running, plant upset, and plant shutdown). This aspect will beformallydocumented where appropriate throughout the HAZOP, and must also feature as aspecific element considered within the agreement and sign-off of the final records of theHAZOP.
5. HAZOP FOLLOW UP ACTIONS
The Responsible Officer shall ensure that all actions arising from the HAZOP are properly
managed and are completed prior to commencing the modification or commissioning themodified plant as determined during the HAZOP.
The items recorded on the HAZOP Study Record form SF1309 as requiring action shall benumbered and a required date of completion established. This information shall be entered intothe Recommendations column on the HAZOP Study Record.
If the HAZOP generates a large number of HAZOP Actions, the RO may seek approval fromthe Manager of the Area or the Project Engineering Manager to use the Alternative HAZOP
Action Tracking process described in 5.5 below.
5.1 ACTION PROGRESS MANAGEMENT
The basic HAZOP information needs to be entered into Cintellate, then Save. The HAZOPresults form will then be available to be populated, the actions can then be raised and assignedfrom this form.
The Responsible Officer shall arrange for the HAZOP to be entered in Cintellate as follows:
a. Open Cintellate and select Workspace then "Inspection".
b. Select "New" and a new Inspection form will be opened. An Inspection ReferenceNumber will be automatically allocated by the Cintellate system.
c. Enter the HAZOP details as follows:
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
12/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
6. "Department Manager" - select the Manager of the Responsible Officer. Thisperson will be notified by email when the page is saved and will close out the
Inspection entry page by ticking the box at the bottom of the page.
7. Select Start Date, Frequency and Number of Occurrences
8. Hit "Save" to close the form after noting the Inspection Reference number.
Note: Be sure to note the Cintellate Inspection reference number on the originalHAZOP Study Report to enable the matching Cintellate record to be found.
This is essential for reporting from Cintellate where the Reference Number isthe only way to select an item for a report.
d. Create an Action in Cintellate for each HAZOP Action on the HAZOP Study Record asfollows.
1. Open basic HAZOP Inspection (double click the Inspection Number)
2. Move to bottom of form and click on Add new Inspection Results
3. Inspection Date and Inspector must be populated within the form. No
other fields on this form are mandatory, however may be populated ifwanted.
4. Move to bottom of form and click on Add New Actions
5. Fill in the mandatory fields (those with an orange asterisk against the field
name) and any non mandatory fields that you have information to suit.
6. Date Raised select todays date
7. Due Date Enter the date the Action is required to be complete
8. "Assigned To" - Assign the action to the appropriate person9. "Assigned By" - Select the Responsible Officer's name
10. Depatment Select the Department of the Assigned to
11. Action Title Type in a brief but explanatory description
12. Action Description Enter the description of the action exactly as it was
recorded in the HAZOP. Start each action description with the Cintellate
Inspection Reference Number and the Item Number on the HAZOP Study
Record (e.g. HAZOP 4782 Action 27)13. Hit "Save" button to close the form and return to the Inspection form. An
email will be immediately sent to the person to whom the "Action" has been
assigned
14. Create additional Actions to correspond to each of the Actions identified at
the HAZOP.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
13/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
5.2 FOLLOW UP
HAZOP actions will be managed in the Cintellate system. It will automatically generatereminders when actions are not complete by the due date. When complete, actions shall beclosed in Cintellate by the person to whom the action was assigned.
Note: Any Action not completed by the due date will appear in the overdue action listand will be subject to the usual Cintellate escalating notification.
5.3 ACTION COMPLETION
After completion of the action, the person to whom the "Action" was assigned must close theaction in Cintellate by completing the "Action Completion" form. This is done by
1. Selecting "Workspace then Action Management then Actions anddouble clicking on the required action.
2. Move to the "Action Completion" box at the bottom of the form.
3. Complete mandatory fields, Closure Evidence and Completion Date addnew file storage. If needed then Save.
Note: To allow for traceability at a later time, it is important to make reference toassociated documents such as drawing numbers, operating procedures, emailsor memos, etc when describing the action taken. The use of the words "Done"or "Competed" in the close out comments is not sufficient. Full details ofdocuments created or modified are required. Examples include: P&ID aaa wasupdated to Rev. bbb; Refer operating procedure OP-xxx, Rev ccc; Refer tomemo, email, etc dated dd/mm/yyyy
5.4 CINTELLATE REPORTING
Reports are available in Cintellate by selecting "Reports and Graphs" from the entry screen andthen selecting from the lists.
A comprehensive inspection report is available by selecting "Reports and Graphs" then Self
Assessment Reports and then Comprehensive Inspection Report". This report requires theuser to enter the inspection (HAZOP) number previously generated, and lists all actions whethercompleted or not.
5.5 ALTERNATIVE HAZOP ACTION TRACKING PROCEDURE
The alternative HAZOP Action Tracking procedure detailed below may be used when:
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
14/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Use of this Alternative HAZOP Action Tracking procedure must be approved in writing by theProject Director or Project Manager for major projects, Business Unit Manager or ProjectEngineering Manager for plant projects.
5.5.2 Procedure
a. The HAZOP shall be completed and Actions identified and assigned as detailed in thisGuide Manual.
b. After the HAZOP, an Action Summary sheet shall be produced by either1. manually entering all Actions into an Excel spreadsheet; or
2. using a software based HAZOP recording system to create the documentedrecord.
c. The Action Summary sheet shall provide a direct cross reference to the original HAZOPrecord and will show for each Action:
1. a brief description of the action required
2. the person or organisation to whom the Action has been assigned3. the required completion date
4. completion status
d. A single Cintellate entry making direct reference to both the original HAZOP and theAction Summary sheet shall be made by the RO. The Cintellate entry shall have oneAction on the RO to close out all HAZOP Actions before commissioning the new plantwhich was the subject of the HAZOP.
e. The RO will then send out individual Action requests to each person or organisation towhich an Action has been assigned. This request will be accompanied by a copy (paperor electronic) of the HAZOP Action sheet for that Action.
f. When the Action is complete, the person or organisation to whom an Action has beenassigned will complete and sign a paper copy of the HAZOP Action sheet and return thesigned original to the RO.
g. On receipt of each signed HAZOP Action sheet, the RO will review the sheet and ifsatisfied that the Action is truly complete, will
1. countersign the form (subject to note below)
2. insert the signed-off HAZOP Action sheet in the Project file
3. change the status for that Action on the Action Summary sheet to complete.
Note: Each completed HAZOP Action sheet shall have two signatories in order toverify that the appropriate action has been implemented The person verifying
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
15/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
i. The Cintellate Action item covering all the items on the Action Summary sheet will thenbe signed off.
j. All HAZOP Actions must be complete and the Cintellate entry signed off prior tocommissioning. If any HAZOP actions that require data obtained during or postcommissioning cannot be completed (eg maintenance PMs, some plant alarm settings,etc.), these can be considered complete when the relevant actions are captured in draftprocedures.
k. If an Action item cannot be completed until after plant commissioning eg whereoperating plant data or experience is required, and is not covered by item j. above, then anew entry and associated outstanding action shall be created in Cintellate for eachAction item. The original Cintellate action covering all the HAZOP Actions can then beclosed with a cross-reference to the new Cintellate outstanding action item.
6. HAZOP CLOSURE
6.1 CLOSE-OUT
When all follow-up actions are complete, the Responsible Officer shall note on the HAZOPStudy Record of Discussions (SF 1909) that all items have been completed and make referenceto the Inspection Reference Number in Cintellate.To assist in later verification, a copy of thecomplete Cintellate record should be printed out after all actions have been completed andattached to the HAZOP Study Record in the Project file.
Note: The impact of the modification(s) during all plant conditions (ie. start up, running, plantupset, and plant shutdown) musthave its related HAZOP conditions revisited during the Close-
out process.
6.2 CLOSE OUT MEETING
The Responsible Officer will arrange a close out meeting to record completion of outstandingissues.
Once all parties are satisfied that all issues arising from the study have been adequatelyaddressed and are reflected in the project design documentation, form HAZOP Study Record of
Discussions form shall be completed and signed off by the Responsible Officer and theCustomer Representative.
No commissioning activities associated with the modification or the new plant covered by theHAZOP shall commence until form HAZOP Study Record of Discussions (SF1909) has beensigned off.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
16/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
4. Study date5. Participant names, job titles, organisation, brief profile
Note: Any generic issues or matters requiring further study but not considered to bepart of the HAZOP should still be recorded on the HAZOP Study Record and aperson nominated to follow up
b. Signed off HAZOP Study Record of Discussions (SF 1909)
c. The original copy of all P&IDs used in the study (with lines clearly identified)
d. Variations in guide words used.
e. Signed off Action Summary sheet (if generated in accordance with 5.5.1)
f. Signed off HAZOP Action sheets (if generated in accordance with 5.5.1)
The study Responsible Officer is responsible for the preparation and collation of the output
documentation from the HAZOP study, and for forwarding it to all attendees, including theChairperson who should sign off the HAZOP Study Record before filing by the ResponsibleOfficer.
The Responsible Officer ensures an electronic copy the documentation listed above is filed inthe Domino.Doc System in accordance withManagement of Risk Assessment Records (GM-04-041-14). A hard copy of all this documentation will also be filed in the Project File by theProject Officer.
8. RECORD KEEPING TABLE
RECORDIDENTIFICATION
StorageMedia
StorageLocation
IndexingMethod
RetentionPeriod
AuthorisedDisposer
DisposalMethod
FormNo.
Document Title
SF1309 HAZOP StudyRecord
Paper
Electronic
Project File
Domino Doc
ProjectNumber
Indefinite
SF1909 HAZOP StudyRecord ofDiscussions
Paper
Electronic
Project File
Domino Doc
ProjectNumber
Indefinite
Record ofActions arisingfrom the HAZOP
Paper
Electronic
Cintellate
Project File
Domino Doc
Cintellate
ProjectNumber
Indefinite
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
17/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
APPENDIX 1 - RISK ASSESSMENT TABLES
CONSEQUENCE
DESCRIPTION
Injury / Illness EnvironmentProperty Damage /
Process Loss
Insignificant Minor Injury / Illness Little or no environmentalimpact Low financial loss($500,000)
LIKELIHOOD DESCRIPTION RISK RANK IMPACT
Rare Only by exception L Low risk
Unlikely Could occur at some stage M Medium risk
Possible Might occur at some time H High risk
Likely Will probably occur E Extreme risk
Almost certain Is expected to occur
Table 1 HAZOP Risk Assessment: Consequence, Likelihood and RiskRanking Definitions
Once the reasonable consequence and likelihood of each potential unwanted event isdetermined, the risk can be ranked using the Risk Assessment Matrix below and recorded onthe HAZOP Study Record sheet.
LIKELIHOOD CONSEQUENCEInsignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Rare L L M H H
Unlikely L L M H E
Possible L M H E E
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
18/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 18 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
APPENDIX 2 - HAZARD STUDY CARDS
NEW DRAWING1. DESCRIPTION OF PURPOSE OF PLANT SHOWN2. BROAD OUTLINE OF OPERATION
NEW LINE OR SYSTEM1. PURPOSE OF LINE AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT2. NORMAL OPERATING CONDITION3. NORMAL METHOD OF OPERATION4. DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT, VALVES, INSTRUMENTS5. GENERAL BROAD DISCUSSION
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
19/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 19 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
HIGH FLOW
HIGH LEVEL
PUMP RACING, DELIVERY VESSEL PRESSURE LOST, SUCTION PRESSURISED, SCALE DISLODGED,LEAK IN HEAT ECHANGER, LOSS OF AUTO CONTROL, OPERATOR ERROR, FAILURE OF PIPE, TRAP,ETC.
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
BLOCKED OR ARCHED CHUTES, LUMPS FALLING ONTO BELT, CLEAN OUT SAFETY, BELT RUN"ON,
SEQUENCING, OBSTRUCTION, CONVEYOR BELT BROKEN, DRIVE BELT BROKEN, BELT RUN" BACK,BUCKET RUN" BACK.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
20/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 20 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
LOW FLOW
LOW LEVEL
PUMP FAILURE, SCALING OF DELIVERY, FOREIGN BODY OR SEDIMENT, POOR SUCTIONCONDITION, CAVITATION, LEAK IN HEAT ECHANGER, DRAIN LEAKING, VALVE #AMMED, LOSS OFAUTO CONTROL, OPERATOR ERROR, FAILURE OR #OINT, PIPE, TRAP ETC.
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
BLOCKED OR ARCHED CHUTES, LUMPS FALLING ONTO BELT, CLEAN OUT SAFETY, BELT RUN" ON,SEQUENCING, OBSTRUCTION, CONVEYOR BELT BROKEN, DRIVE BELT BROKEN, BELT RUN" BACK,BUCKET RUN"BACK.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
21/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 21 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
ZERO FLOW
EMPTY
PUMP FAILURE, DELIVERY VESSEL$MAIN PRESSURISED, GAS LOCKING, BLOCKAGE PRESENCE OFFOREIGN BODY, SCALE ETC. SUCTION VESSEL EMPTY, LOSS OF AUTO CONTROL, OPERATORERROR, FAILURE OF #OINT, PIPE ETC.
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
BLOCKED OR ARCHED CHUTES, LUMPS FALLING ONTO BELT, CLEAN OUT SAFETY, BELT RUN" ON,SEQUENCING, OBSTRUCTION, CONVEYOR BELT BROKEN, DRIVE BELT BROKEN, BELT RUN" BACK,BUCKET RUN"BACK.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
22/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 22 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
REVERSE FLOW
PUMP FAILURE, PUMP REVERSED, DELIVERY VESSEL$MAIN OVER PRESSURE, POOR ISOLATION,GAS LOCKING, SURGING, BACK SIPHONING, LOSS OF AUTOMATIC CONTROL, OPERATOR ERROR,PIPE FAILURE, ETC.
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
STOP BEFORE START, WARNING FOR TAIL DISCHARGE ELEVATOR ROLL"BACK.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
23/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 23 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
HIGH PRESSURE
- VENTING
- RELIEF RATE
BOILING, CAVITATION, FREE%ING, CHEMICAL BREAKDOWN, FLASHING, CONDENSATION,SEDIMENTATION, SCALING, FOAMING, GAS RELEASE, PRIMING, EPLODING, IMPLODING, CHANGES INVISCOSITY, DENSITY, ETERNAL FIRE, WEATHER CONDITIONS.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
24/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 24 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
LOW PRESSURE
- VENTING
- RELIEF RATE
BOILING, CAVITATION, FREE%ING, CHEMICAL BREAKDOWN, FLASHING, CONDENSATION,SEDIMENTATION, SCALING, FOAMING, GAS RELEASE, PRIMING, EPLODING, IMPLODING, CHANGES INVISCOSITY, DENSITY, ETERNAL FIRE, WEATHER CONDITIONS.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
25/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 25 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
HIGH TEMPERATURE
BOILING, CAVITATION, FREE%ING, CHEMICAL BREAKDOWN, FLASHING, CONDENSATION,SEDIMENTATION, SCALING, FOAMING, GAS RELEASE, PRIMING, EPLODING, IMPLODING, CHANGES INVISCOSITY, DENSITY, ETERNAL FIRE, WEATHER CONDITIONS.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
26/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 26 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
LOW TEMPERATURE
BOILING, CAVITATION, FREE%ING, CHEMICAL BREAKDOWN, FLASHING, CONDENSATION,SEDIMENTATION, SCALING, FOAMING, GAS RELEASE, PRIMING, EPLODING, IMPLODING, CHANGES INVISCOSITY, DENSITY, ETERNAL FIRE, WEATHER CONDITIONS.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
27/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 27 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
IMPURITIES
- GASEOUS
- LIQUID
- SOLID
INGRESS OF AIR, WATER, STEAM, FUEL, LUBRICANTS, CORROSION PRODUCTS, OTHER PROCESS
MATERIALS FROM HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM, LEAKAGE FROM HEAT ECHANGER SYSTEM.
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
CONTAMINANTS, MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS DEVIATION, TRAMP METAL.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
28/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 28 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
CHANGE IN COMPOSITION
CHANGE IN CONCENTRATION
2 PHASE FLOW
REACTION
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
ACIDIC FUMES, BUILD" UP, OVER GRANULATION, SCREEN BLINDING,
SETS TOO FAST, STICKS TO BELT$IDLERS, HARD TO CLEAN.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
29/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 29 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
TESTING
- EQUIPMENT (INCL. TRIPS & ALARMS)
- PRODUCT
HOW DO WE KNOW THEY ARE OK&
VACUUM ' PRESSURE TESTING WITH HARMLESS MATERIAL.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
30/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 30 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
PLANT ITEMS
- OPERABLE
- MAINTAINABLE
ACCESS, ISOLATION, SPARES, PURGING, DRYING, COOLING, WARMING
FOR SOLIDS HANDLING PROCESSES!
LACK OF ACCESS (IDLERS, SCRAPERS), BUILD" UP CAUSING DIFFICULTY MOVING, LONG CLEANINGREACH, CONFINED SPACE.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
31/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 31 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
ELECTRICAL
- AREA CLASSIFICATION
- ISOLATION
- EARTHING
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
32/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 32 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
INSTRUMENTS
" SUFFICIENT FOR CONTROL
" TOO MANY
" CORRECT LOCATION
" INFORMATION FOR OPERATORS
THIS LINE IS NOW COMPLETE. NOW DO NEXT LINE.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
33/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 33 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
OVERVIEW
" TO BE DONE WHEN ALL LINES ARE COMPLETE." CONSIDER CUMULATIVE AND POTENTIAL OFFSITE IMPACTOF THE REVIEWED PROCESS (SUCH AS IMPACT ONUPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROCESS DUE TOMODIFICATIONS$CHANGES).
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
34/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 34 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
SERVICES REQUIRED
" AIR" NITROGEN
" WATER
" ETC.
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
35/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 35 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
" VESSELS" PIPELINES
" PUMPS
" OTHERS
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
36/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 36 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
COMMISSION
" BROADLY HOW WILL IT BE DONE" WHAT DIFFICULTIES ' HA%ARDS CAN BE FORESEEN
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
37/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 37 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
STARTUP
" FIRST STARTUP METHODS, DIFFICULTIES," HA%ARDS ROUTINE STARTUP METHODS, DIFFICULTIES,
" HA%ARDS TOO MANY INTERLOCKS&
HAZOP P
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
38/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 38 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
SHUTDOWN
- ISOLATION
- PURGING
DIFFICULTIES, HA%ARDS
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
39/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 39 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
BREADOWN
- POWER FAILURE
- AIR
- STEAM
- WATER
- VACUUM
- FUEL
- VENTS- COMPUTER
- OTHER
MA#OR CAUSES OF BREAKDOWN EMERGENCY PROCEDURES ' COMMUNICATIONS
WHICH WAY SHOULD VALVES MOVE
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
40/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 40 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
EFFLUENT
- GASEOUS
- LIQUID
- SOLID
CONTAINMENT
REACTIONS IN DRAINS
TREATMENT METHODS
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
41/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 41 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
NOISE
SOURCES
PROBLEMS&
CONTROL MEASURES
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
42/62
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 42 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
FIRE
EXPLOSION
BROAD OVERVIEW " PROTECTION, PREVENTION, CONTROL
LOCATION OF SAFETY SHOWERS, DELUGES, SHUT"OFF VALVES ' CONTROLS.
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
43/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 43 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
" PERSONAL" FIRE DETECTION
" FIRE FIGHTING
" MEANS OF ESCAPE
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
44/62
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
45/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 45 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
PERSONAL HAZARD
SOLIDS HANDLING!
FUMES,
LUMPS OFF CONVEYORS,
EPOSURE TO MAGNETIC FIELD,
DUST,
LOCATION OF NORMAL ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT,
POTENTIAL FOR LOOSE OB#ECTS TO FALL (EG ACCESS DOORS ' WEDGES.
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
46/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 46 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
GUIDE WORDS AND DEVIATION FOR COMPUTERISED ANDDISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS.
ITEMS LISTED ON THE FOLLOWING CARDS CAN BEADDRESSED BY ASING THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
47/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 47 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
DOES IT MATTER!
RISK ASSESSMENT
LIKELIHOOD
CONSEQUENCE
HAZOP Process
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
48/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 48 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
WILL THE OPERATOR NOW!
HAZOP Process
GM 08 030 02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
49/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 49 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
ANY ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE OPERATOR OR OTHER SYSTEMS!
HAZOP Process
GM 08 030 02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
50/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 50 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
ANY CHANGES NEEDED!
HAZOP Process
GM 08 030 02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
51/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 51 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
PURPOSE
METHOD OF OPERATION, CONTROL PHILOSOPHY, SAFETY RELATED FUNCTIONS
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
52/62
GM-08-030-02
Version No. 15.0 Page 52 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
MORE OF
SIGNAL ACTION, BLOCK OF DATA, TRANSFER FREQUENCY.
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
53/62
GM 08 030 02
Version No. 15.0 Page 53 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
LESS OF
SIGNAL ACTION, INCOMPLETE TRANSFER, SYSTEM CRASHES DURING TRANSFER.
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
54/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 54 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
NONE OF
SIGNAL ACTION, NO TRANSFER, ACTUATOR STUCK.
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
55/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 55 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
OTHER THAN
MISMATCH DUE TO SOFTWARE CHANGE OR REFORMAT, INCORRECT ACTION OR SIGNAL.
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
56/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 56 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
SOONER " LATER THAN
PROCESSING OF MEASUREMENTS, TIME OUT, OUT OF SEQUENCE, AVERAGING ASSUMPTIONS.
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
57/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 57 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
CORRUPTION
NOISE, MAGNETIC FIELDS, RADIO INTERFERENCE, WELDING, LIGHTNING, HIGH VOLTAGE
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
58/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 58 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
REVERSE
LOOK AT ABOVE POINTS WITH DATA TRANSFER IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
59/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 59 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
INTERACTION
WITH OTHER SYSTEMS, START"UP, SHUT"DOWN, NORMAL OPERATION, EPECTED OR REQUIRED
OPERATOR ACTIONS, SYNCHRONISATION AND TIMING ISSUES AND ALARMS, PLANT UPSETS
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
60/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 60 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
TUNING PARAMETERS
ARE THEY CORRECT, ANY CHANGES REQUIRED
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
61/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 61 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
SECURITY
SECURITY ACCESS LEVEL, PROTECTION AGAINST UNAUTHORISED MODIFICATION
HAZOP Process
GM-08-030-02
-
8/14/2019 GM-08-030-02.pdf
62/62
Version No. 15.0 Page 62 of 62
Document last modified: 08 May 2013. Date printed: 08 May 2013.
OTHER
TRAINING
TESTING