gloucestershire clinical commissioning group shadow board … · 2015-12-10 · presentation. 7...
TRANSCRIPT
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Shadow Board
AGENDA Meeting to be held at 2pm on Thursday 15th November 2012 in the
Board Room, Sanger House, Brockworth, Gloucester GL3 4FE No. Item Lead Recommendation 1 Apologies for Absence
Dr Helen Miller
2 Declarations of Interest
Dr Helen Miller
3 Minutes of the Meeting held on Thursday 18th October 2012
Dr Helen Miller Approval
4 Matters Arising
Dr Helen Miller
5 Chair’s Update
Dr Helen Miller Information
6 Presentation: Health & Wellbeing Consultation
Dr Shona Arora Information www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/healthandwellbeing
7 Performance against Commissioning Report
Mary Hutton Information
8 QIPP Programme Update
Mary Hutton Information
9 Any Other Business (AOB)
Dr Helen Miller
10 Public Questions
Dr Helen Miller
Date and time of next meeting: Thursday 20th December 2012 at 2pm in Board Room at Sanger House
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 1 of 7
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Shadow Board
Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 18th October 2012 in
the Board Room, Sanger House, Gloucester GL3 4FE Present: Dr Helen Miller HM Chair Dr Andy Seymour AS Deputy Clinical Chair Dr Shona Arora SA Director of Public Health Dr Caroline Bennett CBe GP - North Cotswolds Locality Dr Charles Buckley CBu GP - Stroud & Berkeley Vale Locality Alan Elkin AE Non Executive Director Malcolm Gerald MGe GP Martin Gibbs MG GP - Forest of Dean Locality Dr William Haynes WH GP - Gloucester City Locality Sarah Hughes SH Deputy Director of Nursing Mary Hutton MH Deputy Chief Executive Hein le Roux HLR GP - Stroud & Berkeley Vale Locality Cath Leech CL Deputy Director of Finance Richard Lewis RL Deputy Director of Human & Corporate
Resources Liz Mearns LM Medical Director Rob Rees RR Non Executive Director Dr Jeremy Welch JW GP - Tewkesbury Locality In attendance: Mark Branton MB Deputising for the Commissioning Director
Adults and Director of Adult Social Services Kevin Elliott KE Senior Commissioning Manager (Learning
Disability) Emma Simpson ES Board Administrator Mark Walkingshaw MW Locality Commissioning Director Valerie Webb VW CCG Lay Member for Business There were 4 members of the public present. 1 Apologies for Absence 1.1 Jill Crook, Debra Elliott, Nuala Ring, Jan Stubbings, Margaret
Willcox.
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 2 of 7
2 Declarations of Interest
2.1 Item 6 – MG stated that he is employed by Poplars
Rehabilitation Unit. 3 Minutes of the Meeting held on Thursday 13th September 2012 3.1 The minutes were approved as a true and correct record.
4 Matters Arising Item Description Response Action with 13.9.12 Agenda Item 8
CCG Shadow Board Draft Terms of Reference (TOR)
It was agreed that the wording on page 11 section 13.2 would be replaced with the equivalent for the Cluster Board.
Company Secretary Completed
5 Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG)
Shadow Board Chair’s Report 5.1 The report highlights some of the activities of the Chair
since the Committee last met. 5.2 A brief outline was given of the CCG authorisation on
September 20th 2012. 5.3 RESOLUTION - The CCG noted the report. 6 Presentation: The Learning Disability Partnership
Board: Quality of Services in Gloucestershire 6.1 KE introduced the presentation and highlighted a number
of headings which included: Expectations around next steps on Winterbourne View Out of county service users
Service users with challenging behaviour Historic lack of quality system in Learning Disability and
Mental Health Services Safeguarding alerts and referrals are on the increase
Commissioning measures Training Safeguarding measures The CQC Projects and pilots in progress
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 3 of 7
Quality projects The components of the project
Quality assurance reviews
6.2 Questions and discussion points included: 360 degree appraisal – are the results of this in the
public domain? No, information is currently shared back to the provider and any concerns get highlighted directly to the commissioner.
People placed in Gloucestershire by other trusts. Electronic monitoring – system which demonstrates that
a person is where they say they are is being introduced. Concerns that the above could inhibit people from
thriving. Assurance was given to the CCG that attempts are made to manage people in the least restrictive way.
6.3 RESOLUTION - The CCG Shadow Board noted the
presentation. 7
Carers Commissioning Strategy
7.1 MB presented the Joint Carers Commissioning Strategy 2013-2016 for approval which was a supplementary paper to the submission approved at the previous Board in relation to support for carers.
7.2 Questions and discussion points included:
Children as carers – CCG members asked how young people had been involved in developing a strategy. A briefing would be sought on this from Linda Uren but assurance was given that this area has formed a continuous focus during the consultation process, including the Lead Cabinet member for young carers.
A discussion took place about current and future funding levels and strategy. MB explained that the budget indicated in the paper was for a specific area of carer support and that there were many other funding sources and support arrangements in place for carers in Gloucestershire.
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 4 of 7
7.3 RESOLUTION: The Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group agreed to:
Approve the Joint Carers Commissioning Strategy
Recommend to NHS Gloucestershire and NHS Swindon PCT Cluster Board that the Strategy be formally adopted subject to some clarity regarding children as carers and that MB, MG and SA would ensure that this was included in the final report.
Confirmation will be provided through the CCG Chairs report.
8 Quality assurance during the transition 8.1 The report has arisen from discussions in the
Commissioning for Quality Group about the need to maintain a robust quality assurance process during the transition to develop new systems that meet the statutory responsibilities of the new organisation, to ensure that we measure what matters and provide necessary assurance to CCG Board.
8.2 The background and context was outlined as set out on
pages 3 and 4 of the report.
8.3 A number of key issues were raised including:
Addressing variation around primary care quality. Importance of embedding quality in all that the CCG
does, particularly relating to the development of the new Clinical Programme Groups.
How specialised commissioning quality and outcomes will feed in to assurance frameworks?
8.4 RESOLUTION – the CCG endorsed the proposed
approach as a broad direction of travel.
In due course more detailed proposals will be brought forward, including:
Roles and responsibilities of the Quality sub committee
Quality assurance strategy
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 5 of 7
Reporting structures Governance frameworks. 9 Commissioning for Quality Report – Quarter 1 9.1 The Deputy Director of Nursing introduced the report
which provided the CCG with a summary of the 3 aspects of quality:
Patient and Carer Experience Patient Safety and Risk Clinical Effectiveness
9.2 Several issues were highlighted including:
The overall quality achievements and assurance provided, in particular the positive impact of CQuINs
CCG members asked how we monitor performance. It was noted that this is a continual review mechanism through the Contract Quality Review Groups
Quality assurance for nursing homes was discussed and MB explained the current arrangements by GCC and proposed improvements
In view of the previous paper the future quality assurance reports will be developed this year.
9.3 RESOLUTION: The CCG noted the report. 10 Performance against Commissioning Report 10.1 The Director of Finance introduced the report which
provides a strategic overview of the financial and service performance issues by exception. It was noted that the report sets out the financial position as at the end of August 2012 and therefore requires an update.
10.2 The CCG noted that an update will be given to a future
meeting regarding retrospective Continuing Healthcare (CHC) claims.
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 6 of 7
10.3 In relation to performance, several areas are being focussed on:
Percentage of Trauma and Orthopaedic (T&O) admitted Pathways treated within 18 weeks – Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GHNHSFT) achieved 89% performance during September. Achieving 90% (full compliance) is now within reach and there is a commitment to achieve this by Quarter 3. List management is improving.
Percentage of patients who have waited more than 6 weeks for one of the 15 key diagnostic tests – this has been dominated by endoscopy. Additional sanctions will be applied. The number of breaches was around 360 in August which dropped significantly to 220 in September. GHT has committed to zero breaches by November.
Percentage of patients seen within 2 weeks of an urgent referral for suspected cancer – positive news regarding this September performance is at 93% which is moving to a green position.
At least 85% of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer should be seen within 62 days from an Urgent GP referral – the biggest issue relating to this has been urology where capacity has increased. Performance was at 80% in September. Mitigating actions are outlined in the report.
CDiff – back on target for September and move to green is expected within a month.
Physiotherapy/podiatry targets – green was achieved in September.
10.4 RESOLUTION - The Shadow Board noted the reported
financial position for 2012/13 and the performance against the 2012/13 national targets and the actions taken to ensure that performance is at a high standard.
11 QIPP Programme Update 11.1 The CCG Shadow Board were provided with an update
of progress against the QIPP themes and main programmes of work, identifying progress to date, key risks and proposed remedial actions.
CCG Shadow Board Minutes – October 2012 Page 7 of 7
11.2 RESOLUTION - The Shadow Board noted the
performance against planned QIPP programme and the proposed remedial actions.
12 Any Other Business 12.1 There was no other business. 13 Public Questions 13.1 An ambassador for Carers UK stated that she felt the
consultation process relating to the Joint Carers Commissioning Strategy was rushed and that Carers should have been leading the project. Discussion took place on the issue of a carers’ champion sitting on the CCG. It was noted that there are lots of groups wanting a presence on the governing body but this has to be balanced out with competing needs. It was noted that the Voluntary/Third Sector need to engage at Locality Level as the need and availability are different around the county.
14 Date and time of next meeting
14.1 Thursday 15th November 2012 between 2pm and 5pm
in the Board Room at Sanger House. 14.2 The meeting closed at 3.15pm.
Minutes Approved by the CCG Shadow Board. Signed (Chair):____________________ Date:_____________
Agenda Item 4
Page 1 of 1
Matters arising from previous Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (Shadow Board) Meetings October 2012
Item Description Response Action with 13.9.12 Agenda Item 6
CCG Shadow Board GP Member Reports
It was agreed that a working group comprising GPs and members of the Finance Team be established in order to ascertain which information needs to be reported. Dr Hein le Roux and Dr Jeremy Welch were volunteered to sit on this group. It is likely the group will meet for the first time in November.
Chair Ongoing
18.10.12 Agenda Item 7
Carers Commissioning Strategy
Children as carers – CCG members asked how young people had been involved in developing a strategy. A briefing would be sought on this from Linda Uren but assurance was given that this area has formed a continuous focus during the consultation process, including the Lead Cabinet member for young carers. Mark Branton/Martin Gibbs/Shona Arora to ensure caveats relating to children as carers are worked in to the final report.
MB MB/MG/SA
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item 5
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group
(Shadow Board) Meeting Date 15th November 2012
Title Clinical Commissioning Gloucestershire
(CCG) Shadow Board Chair’s Report
Executive Summary The report highlights some of the activities of the Chair since the Committee last met. The Chair will give a further verbal update on her engagements at the meeting.
Key Issues None. Risk Issues: Original Risk Residual Risk
None
Financial Impact None
Legal Issues(including NHS Constitution)
None
Impact on Equality and Diversity
None
Impact on Health Inequalities
None
Impact on Sustainable Development
None
Patient and Public Involvement
None
Recommendation This report is provided for information only
Author Dr Helen Miller Designation Chair, Clinical Commissioning
Gloucestershire Sponsoring Director (if not author)
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item 5
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group
(Shadow Board)
15th November 2012
Chair’s Report
1 Introduction
1.1 This report sets out some of the key activities of the Chair since the Committee last met.
1.2 GP engagement event on 11/11/12.
Interviews for senior management positions within the CCG.
Leadership Gloucestershire – presentation about the CCG.
CCG GP Consortium Meeting. Forest of Dean Health Forum. National Female Leaders Action Learning set. Practice Managers Event – presentation.
2 Recommendations 2.1 This report is provided for information only.
Page 1 of 26
Agenda Item 7
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (Shadow Board)
Meeting Date 15th November 2012 Title Performance against Commissioning
Report Executive Summary This integrated performance report provides
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (GCCG) with a strategic overview of the financial and service performance issues by exception. This report sets out the Financial position is as at the end of October 2012. The Commissioned Service Performance position is dependent upon the availability of the data.
Key Issues
These are set out in the main body of the report
Risk Issues: Original Risk Residual Risk
All risks are identified within the relevant sections of this report.
Financial Impact Not meeting key financial targets
Legal Issues (including NHS Constitution)
Compliance with the NHS Constitution as part of the 18 week referral to treatment commitment
Impact on Equality and Diversity
Not Applicable.
Impact on Health Inequalities
The are no direct health and equality implications contained within this report
Impact on Sustainable Development
The are no direct sustainability implications contained within this report
Patient and Public Involvement
The Health, Community & Care Overview and Scrutiny Committee receive a report of performance against key targets.
Recommendation The Board is asked to: Take note of the reported financial
Page 2 of 26
position for 2012/13 Take note of the performance against
national targets and the actions taken to ensure that performance is at a high standard.
Author & Designation
Roy Hewlett, Assistant Director Performance & Planning (NHSG) Steve Perkins, Head of Financial Planning (NHSG)
Sponsoring Director (if not author)
Mary Hutton, Director of Finance
Page 3 of 26
Agenda Item 7
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (Shadow Board)
November 2012
Integrated Performance Report
1 Introduction
1.1 This report sets out NHS Gloucestershire (NHSG) 2012/13 Financial and Commissioned Service performance. It is broken down into two sections covering performance relating to the key commissioning service targets and financial position of NHSG.
1.2 The performance section will also include an update on current performance against the key deliverables outlined in the NHSG Annual Operating Plan as at the end of Quarter 1.
1.3 Only those areas of performance assessed as being at significant risk of failure at year end, or other issues that engendered concerns throughout the year, for which the Board need to be made aware of, are included in the report. Where standards are reported on a quarterly basis, the board will be informed of updates as and when data is available or new information comes to light. The full summary of performance is included in the relevant appendices.
1.4 The supporting appendices provide a full analysis of the PCT’s
Finance position, and performance against our Commissioning performance targets. The 2012/13 commissioning performance scorecard (appendix 3) provides an integrated report describing the performance of NHSG. The scorecard covers the 2012/13 Operating Framework targets, NHS Constitution commitments and key ‘local offer’ commitments. Appendix 8 provides a RAG
Page 4 of 26
rated report covering progress against delivering the Annual Operating Plan key deliverables.
2 Performance
2.1 A full overview of current performance of NHSG against the national and key local targets is given in appendix 3 that is ordered in the following overarching themes;
Unscheduled Care Planned care Primary and Community Care Public Health Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Quality
All indicators are RAG rated, based on the 2012/13 NHS Performance Framework thresholds. In addition, the Year To Date and Year End Forecast positions are also given to enable the level of risk to better quantified at year end.
2.2 The overall level of performance is very good and a summary of the YTD position is given in the table below. This shows that of the total of 50 indicators reported on; 41 were rated Green (82%), 8 Amber (16%) and just one Red (2%).
Breakdown of current year to date performance by RAG status of indicator
Green Amber Red
NHS Gloucestershire 41 8 1
Percentage 82% 16% 2%
2.3
Areas where performance has been particularly good include:
The 4 hour A&E target is being met by all hospitals in the PCT area.
Both Cat A8 and A19 performance targets have been achieved throughout the year.
Patients are able to receive treatment for Community
Page 5 of 26
Services in Gloucestershire within 8 weeks of referral. These are some of the best access times in the country.
VTE risk assessment target has been consistently met within all Hospitals within the PCT area.
2.4 The table below provides a fuller position statement for all the
Amber and Red rated indicators. This table outlines current performance, identifies the issues leading to that performance and mitigating actions being taken to recover performance.
Page 6 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action Planned Care PHQ19 NHS
Glos At least 90% of Trauma & Orthopaedic admitted RTT pathways should be treated within 18 Weeks
RED YTD There has been a significant improvement in performance since June (76.8%) and performance in September for NHSG was 12 percentage points better at 88.8%. This represents the best ever performance for this standard.
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GHNHSFT) has had a persistent backlog of between 200-350 T&O patients that have already waited more than 18 weeks. The bulk of this backlog needs to be cleared, and the average waiting time reduced, to enable the target to be achieved sustainably.
GHNHSFT have restated their commitment to achieve the target by the end of Q3 2012/13. Waiting list management by consultant has improved performance and those consultants not achieving the required standard will have their work plans altered to allow them to clear their backlog. The backlog of patients that have already waited over 18weeks has reduced by over 60% since April 2012 which shows significant improvement in both waiting list and capacity management.
Page 7 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action Patients suitable for transfer are to being offered alternative providers for their surgery. New Referrals into Orthopaedics have reduced by 10% at month 5 which will help with GHNHSFT capacity pressures.
PHQ22 NHS Glos
Not more than 1% of patients should have waited more than 6 weeks for one of the 15 key diagnostic tests
AMBER YTD 3.3% of patients at the end of September had waited 6 weeks or more. This represents 226 breaches of which 223 were at GHNHSFT. Of these 223
GHNHSFT have not had sufficient endoscopy capacity to meet demand and clear the waiting list backlog. The situation worsened following the departure of a locum and Clinical Fellow. The bowel cancer awareness campaign
GHNHSFT have submitted a revised recovery action plan which states that they are committed to clearing the backlog by the end of November 2012. GHNHSFT have extended the contract of the two locums and increased weekend lists, this additional activity has been
Page 8 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action breaches at GHNHSFT, 220 where for endoscopy procedures.
also increased referrals at the start of the year.
ring-fenced for over 6 week waiters. The NHSG performance lead is meeting with the GHNHSFT Service lead fortnightly to monitor progress against their recovery plan and currently GHNHSFT are on plan to achieve the target by November.
PHQ24 NHS Glos
At least 93% of patients should be seen within 2 weeks of an urgent referral for suspected cancer
AMBER YTD 91.5% in August
Performance has been impacted by an increase of 11% in 2 week referrals in the first 4 months of 2012/13 compared to the same period the previous year. Additionally many of the breaches are due
Following a performance meeting with GHNHSFT on the 7th September, GHNHSFT will discussing possible solutions to minimise patient choice breaches at the Clinical Programme Group. The increased endoscopy capacity has reduced the
Page 9 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action to patients choosing to wait longer than 2 weeks. An audit by GHNHSFT of their 93 breaches in June found that 75 (81%) were due to patients being unable or unwilling to attend within 2 weeks. Lack of endoscopy capacity has also led to patients having to wait longer than 2 weeks.
number of lower GI breaches significantly.
PHQ25 NHS Glos
At least 93% of patients should be seen within 2 weeks of an urgent referral for breast symptoms where
AMBER YTD 99.1% in August, 92.3% YTD
Poor performance in April, due to Breast Consultant unavailability, has impacted on YTD performance.
Staffing issues have now been resolved and the target has been achieved in every month since April. It is predicted that the target will be achieved in Q2 and at year end.
Page 10 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action cancer is not initially suspected
PHQ03 NHS Glos
At least 85% of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer should be seen within 62 days from an Urgent GP referral
AMBER YTD 82.9% in August, 83.4% YTD
Main theme for underperformance has been patients not having all diagnostic tests in time. Urology has been the specialty which has seen the majority of breaches.
GHNHSFT have submitted an action plan, primarily around addressing Urology breaches, which accounts for the majority of the breaches, with the following actions: - Increase theatre
capacity (inc. evening & weekend sessions)
- Review of clinical staffing rotas
- Employment of a Consultant and Clinical Fellow
Performance has steadily improved over the last three months and GHNHSFT expect the
Page 11 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action target to be attained from Q3
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) PHQ13_5 NHS
Glos The proportion of people who have depression and/or anxiety disorders who receive psychological therapies
AMBER YTD 3.8% at Q2 against a plan of 4.5%
This target was achieved in 2011/12 however 2gether NHS Foundation performance in Q1 was significantly below expected levels.
A performance meeting was held with 2gether on the 25th September. Following this meeting an action Plan has been received by 2gNHSFT which includes: - Working closely with
Prison Health - Increasing referrals into
the service - Streamlining initial
assessments by making this part of their referral process
- Training of health visitors to support delivery
2gether are confident that the target will be achieved
PHQ13_6 NHS Glos
The proportion of people who complete therapy who are moving towards recovery
AMBER YTD 47.8% at Q2 against a plan of 51.9%
Page 12 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action at year end and there has already been a significant improvement in Q2 performance.
Quality PHQ27 NHS
Glos Number of MRSA infections (Health Community)
AMBER YTD 6 against a year end ceiling of just 4 for the year.
NHSG have been set an extremely stretching target to achieve a 60% reduction on the 2011/12 outturn of 10.
The numbers are very low and comparable with the number of infections seen in 2011/12. Most infections are in the community and a root cause analysis is carried out on each case.
PHQ28 NHS Glos
Number of C.Diff infections (Health Community)
AMBER YTD 9 against target of 11 in August, YTD 27 over Plan
Despite improved performance in recent months the July and August figure was above the agreed ceiling level. No specific themes can be identified to account for the increase; however similar levels of
NHSG is working with Primary Care and all health care providers to ensure that anti-biotic prescribing are within guidelines and that RCAs (Root Cause Analysis) are carried out where clinical concerns exist. NHSG are part of a South
Page 13 of 26
Ref PCT Indicator Status Issue Mitigating Action increases have been experienced in other health communities.
West review group of community infections, to further understand the increases seen across the South West. Local infection control group countywide has been re-established to start discuss strains any identify any reoccurring themes
Page 14 of 26
3.0
Annual Operating Plan – performance against key deliverables
3.1 The Integrated Annual Operating Plan for NHS Gloucestershire describes the proposed processes and structures for the implementation of the cluster’s key deliverables and reform agenda. The plan outlines how these key deliverables will be performance managed and reported at both Cluster and Clinical Commissioning Group levels.
3.2 The Integrated Annual Operating plan clearly sets out the key priorities for 2012/13 in appendix 1 of the plan and stipulates how performance will be monitored and reported to the Board on a quarterly basis.
3.3 Performance as at the end of quarter 1 is shown in Appendix 8. This covers all of the key deliverables with the exception of those already reported against within commissioning performance scorecard (appendix 3). Progress against each deliverable is RAG rated and, where applicable, a commentary explaining current performance is given.
3.4 The deliverables have been broken down by Priority, area each of which includes a number of Key Performance Indicators.
3.5 Overall more than 75% of indicators are rated green and are on track to be delivered at the end of 2012/13. No indicator has been rated red (failing) or is considered to be a significant amber against which an exception report is required. Actions being taken to improve the performance of the amber rated deliverables are included within the scorecard. .
Page 15 of 26
4.0 NHS Gloucestershire Financial Overview 2012/13
4.1 NHS Gloucestershire (NHSG) has planned to deliver a surplus of £8.9m for the year 2012/13 against an anticipated revenue resource limit of £961.2m. Appendix 1 shows the income and expenditure position for the year. Appendix 2 illustrates the position for expenditure and outturn variance.
4.2
The income and expenditure year to date position at 31st September 2012 is a surplus of £4.5m. This is in line with the planned year end position of £8.9m surplus. Table 1 below identifies the key variances at Month 06:
Programme area Forecast Outturn Variance £’m
Healthcare Providers Primary Care & Prescribing Admin & Provisions Reserves
(5.6) 0.3
0.0 14.2
Total 8.9
4.3
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHSFT – Contract overview
4.4 The Month 6 year to date position is £2.9m overspent (£2.0m at month 5). GHFT data available at month 6 reporting is complete up to month 5. The following report is based on extrapolation of the month 5 data.
4.5 At this stage in the contract year there are significant variables with assumptions included that will affect the eventual full year contract outturn position. The biggest variable is the £12.3m of planned QIPP (quality, innovation, productivity, prevention) savings within the contract to be achieved.
4.6 A contract forecast outturn overspend of £7.1m (£6.7m at month 5) is reported. Key issues generating the overspend increase
Page 16 of 26
are Emergency admissions and Outpatient attendance.
4.7 This reported position currently assumes the majority of QIPP is achieved. Assessment of ‘actual’ scheme delivery will be taking place as we progress through the year.
Page 17 of 26
Finance Section - exceptions based on significant overspend variances in the NHSG outturn variance
(Sign convention – a positive value indicates an underspend, negative (-) value indicates an overspend) Budget area YTD
Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
Secondary Health Care Provision Planned Care GHFT contract – Excluded Drugs
-£0.6m -£1.1m Lucentis Drugs activity is 10% year to date above activity plan at Month 5.
Discussions are currently taking place around supplier discount rate on Lucentis.
On-going assessment of activity trend increase to validate if this growth rate continues or levels
Unscheduled Care GHFT contract – Emergency admissions
-£3.4m -£6.4m The current forecast overspend is based on a review of previous year trends that suggests that the variance will stabilise after
Work has been continuing to better understand root causes of the variance and identify any issues that can be addressed. It has been
Page 18 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
the first half of 11/12. Latest contract monitoring supports this position as most likely. If the increase continued through the second half year there is another £1m risk that would materialize.
identified that a significant proportion of the increase in admissions is in relation to patients under age 9 and patients over age 80 with the prime diagnosis of infectious diseases and diseases of the respiratory system. This combined with early indication that the rate of increase may now be reducing supports the reported position.
GHFT contract – Maternity/other Non-Elective admissions
-£0.6m -£0.9m Increased Obstetric admissions trend above planned levels
This variance is being reviewed. Indication is that the numbers of births have not significantly increased but complexity of births (e.g. increased C-sections) and levels of non-delivery admissions have increased resulting in this variance.
Page 19 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
Other Contractual GHFT contract – QIPP delivery
-£2.4m -£3.6m The reported forecast position currently includes £7.3m of the £12.3m QIPP requirement as ‘assumed’ contract benefit. However, in addition to the assumed QIPP benefit, £1.4m of Emergency threshold adjustment has also been accounted for within the reported contract position. As a result £3.6m lower delivery than the contract plan is reported. The original planned benefit was profiled as being delivered later in the financial year. Overall scheme delivery will be reviewed each month.
Planned Care and Unscheduled Care programme leads will be reviewing each scheme delivery assumption and potential for additional schemes on an on-going basis.
Page 20 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
In County - Tetbury
-£0.1m -£0.3m At month 6 Tetbury is Overspent by £0.1m, part is due to budget pressure and the rest is over activity in both Outpatients and Day surgery within the following specialties:- Ophthalmology, Gynaecology, and Maxillofacial/ Dermatology.
Out Of County Contracts
-£0.3m
-£0.6m
NBT are reporting a year to date overspend of -£0.2m based on month 5 data. Non elective neurosurgery and T&O are over performing, while elective inpatients are underspent (scoliosis surgery and renal transplants).
We continue to work with UHBT and NBT to understand the impact of the information system problems and changes to their cumulative position. NBT have greater issues, and are planning to have worked these through by the end of November. -£0.5m
-£1.0m
UHBT report year to date overspend of -£0.5m based on 4 months data. Overspend relates to elective and non-
Page 21 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
elective cardiac surgery and cardiology, and associated critical care and excluded drugs.
-£0.5m -£1.0m Elsewhere, Great Western forecasts an overspend of -£0.5m on elective T&O and PBR excluded devices. UH Oxford forecasts an overspend of -£0.4m in non-elective T&O and cardiology.
Specialist Commissioning Specialised Commissioning
£0.0m £0.1m Forecast underspend of £0.1m based on month 4 data. This is made up of a forecast underspend of £1m on Mental health, and a forecast overspend of -£0.9m on acute care. The mental health forecast has declined by -£0.3m since last
We will work through SCG information to unpick straight-line variances as they arise and keep in close contact with them in relation to their QIPP delivery. We are requesting a return to the production of specific
Page 22 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
month due to recognition of a new medium secure placement. Low secure accounts for the majority of underspend. The acute position has seen deterioration against the UHBT forecast by £1.0m, (now forecast at -£1.5m over) linked to BMT, NICU and paediatric surgery. Oxford has seen a deterioration in forecast of -£0.5m against cardiac surgery (-£1.5m forecast overspend within a contract forecast overspend of -£0.9m). GHT is forecasting underspend of £1.2m, against morbid obesity and non-specialised elements.
detail on volatile item forecasts such as Neonatal and BMTs.
Page 23 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
Non Acute Continuing Healthcare (CHC)
£1.8m £3.5m As at month 6, low placement numbers and associated costs have resulted in a significant forecast under spend. Month 6 has seen a reduction in numbers of CHC funded placements, thus increasing the forecast under spend by approx. £0.6m from month 5. CHC budgets were reduced by £2.2m for 12/13 due to significant QIPP achievement in 11/12. The £3.5m forecast under spend is against this rebased budget. Deadline for requests for consideration for retrospective CHC funding passed on Sept 30th and over 600 requests were received. As the requests are worked through on an
Continual close monitoring in conjunction with Funded Nursing Care placement numbers and costs, which are likely to rise as CHC costs fall. At present however, there is only a small YTD overspend reported against FNC.
Page 24 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
individual basis, the likely financial impact will become clearer, however NHSG has a small provision remaining to help partly offset this.
Funded Nursing Care (FNC)
-£0.25m -£0.50m Reduction in CHC eligibility has led to increased pressure on FNC budget. Particular increase around Self-funders from m4 to m5
See above (CHC)
Mental Health -£0.33m -£0.65m There are currently a large number of Eating Disorder (ED) placements in out of county placements, if this number continues the financial pressure on the ED budgets could rise.
On-going placement reviews in ED.
Learning Disabilities
-£0.1m -£0.2m Over spend position outlines anticipated slippage against QIPP delivery. Reduction in forecast from month 5 is due to
Discussions around additional Social Transfer related funding are taking place in hope of mitigating
Page 25 of 26
Budget area YTD Variance (£m)
Forecast Variance (£m)
Issue / Financial Risk Mitigating Actions
delay in patients being transferred back in to county.
risk of pressure in this area.
Acquired Brain Injury
£0.1m £0.2m Placement numbers have reduced from 4 to 1 since the beginning of the year. Change in reported position is due to budget reduction of £0.3m.
Primary care Community Pharmacy
£-0.45
£-1.15 Overspend relates to previous year cost pressure. Pattern of spend from previous years indicates claims will be higher as the year progresses.
On-going monitoring and liaising with medicines management team
Dental 1.0
2.36
Dental Budget continues to under spend against budget. Higher dental income in month 4 contributing to higher under spend in month.
On-going monitoring and liaising with Primary care team.
Page 26 of 26
5 Recommendations 5.1 The Board is asked to:
Take note of the reported financial position for 2012/13 Take note of the performance against national targets
and the actions taken to ensure that performance is at a high standard.
Take note of the performance against the key deliverables in the Annual Operating Plan and the actions taken to ensure that performance is at a high standard.
6 Appendices
6.1 Appendix 1: NHSG Income and expenditure position for 2012/13 as at month 6 Appendix 2: NHSG Year to date expenditure and Outturn variance at month 6 Appendix 3: NHSG Integrated Performance Scorecard Appendix 4: NHSG Capital programme 2012/13 at month 6 Appendix 5: NHSG Better Payment Practice Code Appendix 6: NHSG Cash Reconciliation Appendix 7: NHSG Balance Sheet Appendix 8: NHSG Annual Operating Plan – Q1 performance
Financial Performance Report 2012/13 - Summary Financial Information to September 2012 (M06)
Previous
Month
Forecast
Outturn
Variance Status
Budget Actual Variance
Recurren
t Budget
Non-
recurrent
Budget
Total
Budget Actual Variance
(Adverse) /
Favourable Trend
£'m £'m £'m £'m £m £m £'m £'m £'m
Resource Limit (notified) 902.6 43.0 945.6 936.7 8.9
Anticipated Allocations 0.0 15.6 15.6 15.6 0.0
Revenue Resource Limit 469.0 464.5 4.5 902.6 58.6 961.2 952.3 8.9
Revenue Expenditure
Health Care Providers:
Secondary Health Care Providers 265.7 270.0 (4.3) 513.4 17.3 530.6 539.8 (9.2) (7.5) $
Specialist Commissioning 33.9 33.8 0.0 70.9 (3.2) 67.7 66.9 0.9 1.8 $
Non NHS Contracts (includes BMI) 5.9 5.9 0.0 11.8 0.1 11.8 11.9 (0.0) (0.0) 1
Partnership Budgets including mental health 1.7 1.7 0.1 3.5 0.0 3.5 3.4 0.1 0.1 $
Non-contracted Activity 2.9 3.4 (0.5) 6.3 (0.4) 5.9 6.6 (0.7) 0.0 $
Continuing Health Care & Specialist Placements 29.6 28.4 1.2 48.3 8.9 57.2 53.8 3.4 2.8 #
Public health & Commissioning programmes 3.9 3.9 (0.0) 4.6 3.1 7.7 7.7 0.0 0.0 1
Sub-total 343.7 347.1 (3.5) 658.8 25.7 684.5 690.1 (5.6) (2.8) $
Primary Care:
GP Contracts 36.7 36.9 (0.2) 76.1 1.9 78.0 78.3 (0.3) (0.3) 1
Dental Services 9.9 8.8 1.0 (2.0) 21.7 19.7 19.7 0.0 0.0 1
Prescribing including GP prescribing 43.8 44.0 (0.3) 87.5 0.0 87.5 88.0 (0.5) 0.0 $
Pharmacy 9.3 9.7 (0.4) 11.0 7.6 18.6 19.7 (1.2) (1.2) 1
Ophthalmic Services 2.7 2.5 0.2 0.8 4.7 5.4 3.0 2.3 2.3 1
Clinical PBC Schemes 0.6 0.2 0.4 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.3 (0.2) (0.2) 1
Sub-total 102.9 102.2 0.7 174.6 35.8 210.4 210.1 0.3 0.8 $
Administration & Provisions 10.6 10.6 (0.1) 15.8 4.8 20.7 20.7 0.0 0.0 1
Reserves 11.8 4.5 7.3 53.3 (7.8) 45.6 31.3 14.3 11.0 #
Sub-total 22.4 15.2 7.2 69.2 (2.9) 66.2 52.0 14.3 11.0 #
Total PCT Revenue Expenditure 469.0 464.5 4.5 902.6 58.6 961.1 952.2 8.9 8.9 1
Surplus 469.0 464.5 4.5 902.6 58.6 961.1 952.2 8.9 8.9 1
Year to Date Position Forecast Outturn
Appendix 2 - NHSG Year to date Expenditure and Outturn Variance
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80Se
con
dar
y H
ealt
hca
re P
rovi
sio
n
Spe
cial
ist
Co
mm
issi
on
ing
No
n N
HS
Co
ntr
acts
(in
clu
des
BM
I)
Par
tner
ship
Bu
dge
ts in
clu
din
g m
enta
l hea
lth
No
n C
on
trac
t A
ctiv
ity
Co
nti
nu
ing
Hea
lth
care
& S
pe
cial
ist
Pla
cem
ents
Pu
blic
Hea
lth
& C
om
mis
sio
nin
g P
rog
GP
Co
ntr
acts
De
nta
l
Pre
scri
bin
g
Ph
arm
acy
Op
hth
alm
ic
Clin
ical
Pb
C S
che
me
s
Ad
min
istr
atio
n &
Pro
visi
on
s
Exp
end
itu
re (
£'m
)
Area of expenditure
NHS Gloucestershire Year to date expenditure as at Month 6 (2012/13)
290
270
250
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Seco
nd
ary
Hea
lth
care
Pro
visi
on
Spe
cial
ist
Co
mm
issi
on
ing
No
n N
HS
Co
ntr
acts
(in
clu
des
BM
I)
Par
tner
ship
Bu
dge
ts
No
n C
on
trac
t A
ctiv
ity
Co
nti
nu
ing
Hea
lth
care
& S
pe
cial
ist
Pla
cem
ents
Pu
blic
Hea
lth
& C
om
mis
sio
nin
g P
rog
GP
Co
ntr
acts
De
nta
l
Pre
scri
bin
g
Ph
arm
acy
Op
hth
alm
ic
Clin
ical
Pb
C S
che
me
s
Ad
min
istr
atio
n &
Pro
visi
on
s
Co
nti
nge
ncy
Fore
cast
Var
ian
ce (
£'m
)
Area of expenditure
NHS Gloucestershire Forecast Outturn Variance as at Month 6 (2012/13)
Appendix 3
NHS Gloucestershire 2012/13 Integrated Performance Scorecard
Target2011-12
OutturnApr 2012 May 2012
Jun 2012
Q1Jul 2012 Aug 2012
Sept 2012
Q2Oct 2012 Nov 2012
Dec 2012
Q3Jan 2013 Feb 2013
Mar 2013
Q4
Year to
date
Year end
forecast
Perf.
Measured
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
GRH 94.5% 94.5% 98.0% 97.6% 95.8% 95.9% 95.9% 96.3% > 95%
CGH 90.5% 92.1% 97.5% 96.3% 96.8% 98.1% 98.6% 96.7% > 95%
GHNHSFT total 92.8% 93.5% 97.8% 97.0% 96.2% 96.9% 97.0% 96.4% > 95%
GCS - MIU 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% > 95% C
Target 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
GWAS 75.6% 76.2% 77.3% 79.7% 77.4% 78.1% 77.5% 77.7% > 75%
Glos only 76.5% 77.7% 78.6% 79.1% 78.5% 79.5% 80.1% 78.9% > 75%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
GWAS 95.6% 96.6% 96.4% 96.2% 95.6% 96.1% 95.7% 96.1% >95%
Glos only 95.5% 95.9% 95.9% 96.0% 95.6% 95.9% 95.0% 95.7% >95%
Target 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Actual 90.9% 91.4% 91.2% 87.8% 94.0% 94.0% 94.0% 92.1% >90%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 98.3% 97.9% 98.4% 98.3% 98.3% 98.1% 97.8% 98.2% >95%
Target 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Actual 80.3% 81.3% 80.9% 76.8% 87.0% 88.1% 88.8% 83.6% >90%
Target 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92%
Actual 94.1% 94.9% 95.3% 94.7% 94.2% 95.5% 95.4% 95.0% <92%
Target 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
breaches 1,608 150 361 443 363 366 226 1,909
Performance 2.3% 2.3% 5.4% 6.3% 5.3% 5.3% 3.3% 4.7% <1% in Q4
Target 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93%
breaches 932 150 136 89 103 96 574
Performance 92.2% 85.6% 89.1% 91.0% 90.7% 91.5% 89.6% >93%
Target 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93%
breaches 165 45 3 0 0 1 49
Performance 88.5% 64.3% 97.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 92.3% >93%
Target 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96%
breaches 25 0 2 2 1 5
Performance 99.1% 100.0% 99.3% 99.1% 99.6% 100.0% 99.6% >96%
Target 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94%
breaches 3 0 0 0 1 2 3
Performance 99.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 95.8% 98.8% >94%
Target 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%
breaches 0 0 0 0 0 0
Performance 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% >98%
Target 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94%
breaches 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Performance 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.9% 100.0% 99.8% >94%
Target 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%
breaches 180 16 19 19 18 21 93
Performance 86.0% 84.8% 86.3% 79.6% 82.0% 82.9% 83.4% >85%
Target 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
breaches 8 1 1 0 1 2 5
Performance 96.9% 95.5% 96.3% 100.0% 95.0% 92.3% 95.6% >90%
PHQ04Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer within
62 days from an NHS Cancer screening serviceC
PHQ09Percentage of patients receiving subsequent treatment for cancer within
31 days where that treatment is a Radiotherapy TreatmentC
PHQ03Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer within
62 days of an urgent GP referral for suspected cancerC
PHQ07Percentage of patients receiving subsequent treatment for cancer within
31 days where that treatment is surgeryC
PHQ08Percentage of patients receiving subsequent treatment for cancer within
31 days where that treatment is an Anti-Cancer Drug RegimeC
PHQ25Percentage of patients seen within 2 weeks of an urgent referral for breast
symptoms where cancer is not initially suspectedC
PHQ06Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment within 31 days of
a cancer diagnosisC
Diagnostics
PHQ22Percentage of patients who have waited more than 6 weeks for one of the
15 key diagnostic testsC
Cancer Waits
PHQ024Percentage of patients seen within 2 weeks of an urgent referral for
suspected cancerC
PHQ19Percentage of Trauma & Orthopaedic admitted Pathways treated within
18 WeeksC
PHQ21 Percentage of incomplete Pathways that have waited less than 18 Weeks C
PHQ19 Percentage of admitted pathways treated with in 18 Weeks C
PHQ20 Percentage of non - admitted pathways treated within 18 Weeks C
Ambulance
PHQ01
Cat A 8 min response - The percentage of Category A incidents, which
resulted in an emergency response arriving at the scene of the incident
within 8 minutes.
C
PHQ02Cat A 19 min response - The percentage of calls resulting in an
ambulance arriving at the scene of the incident within 19 minutes. C
Principal Delivery Targets
Unscheduled Care
Accident & Emergency
PHQ23
4-hour A&E target - Percentage of A&E attendances where the patient
spent 4 hours or less in A&E from arrival to transfer, admission or
discharge
C
C
Planned CareAcute Care Referral to Treatment
3
Appendix 3
NHS Gloucestershire 2012/13 Integrated Performance Scorecard
Target2011-12
OutturnApr 2012 May 2012
Jun 2012
Q1Jul 2012 Aug 2012
Sept 2012
Q2Oct 2012 Nov 2012
Dec 2012
Q3Jan 2013 Feb 2013
Mar 2013
Q4
Year to
date
Year end
forecast
Perf.
MeasuredPrincipal Delivery Targets
Unscheduled Care
Target 18.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0%
Actual 23.6% 5.6% 5.3% 10.9% >20%
Target 6.1% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 3.4% 6.7%
Actual 9.1% 2.2% 2.1% 4.3% >6.7%
Target (weeks) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ave wait (weeks) 2.6 2.7 2.3 2.7 2.3 2.2 1.7 1.7
Max wait (weeks) 7 11 10 12 9 13 13
Target (weeks) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ave wait (weeks) 0.9 1.3 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8
Max wait (weeks) 6 7 5 5 7 5 5
Target (weeks) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ave wait (weeks) 2.4 2.8 2.5 2.9 3.1 3.5 2.0 2.0
Max wait (weeks) 7 9 12 10 14 14 14
Target (weeks) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ave wait (weeks) 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.2
Max wait (weeks) 3 5 3 3 3 3 3
Target (weeks) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ave wait (weeks) 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.4 0.7 0.9 0.9
Max wait (weeks) 6 6 6 6 6 4 4
Target (weeks) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ave wait (weeks) 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.5
Max wait (weeks) 9 7 8 6 6 3 3
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% 99.0% 98.8% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 97.0% 95.0% 97.0% 96.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.0% 97.3% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 96.0% 100.0% 99.0% 97.0% 99.0% 100.0% 99.0% 99.0% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 97.0% 98.0% 97.0% 96.0% 96.0% 95.0% 95.0% 96.2% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 96.0% 98.0% 96.0% 99.0% 99.0% 100.0% 97.0% 98.0% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 99.0% 98.0% 95.0% 92.0% 96.0% 97.0% 97.0% 95.0% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% >95%
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 100.0% 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% 96.0% 99.0% >95%AMB 09
Percentage of patients referred to the Diabetic Nursing Service who are
treated within 8 WeeksC
AMB 07Percentage of patients referred to the Adult Physiotherapy Service who
are treated within 8 WeeksC
Specialist Nurses
AMB 08Percentage of patients referred to the Parkinson Nursing Service who are
treated within 8 WeeksC
AMB 05Percentage of patients referred to the Podiatry Service who are treated
within 8 WeeksC
AMB 06Percentage of patients referred to the Adult Occupational Therapy Service
who are treated within 8 WeeksC
AMB 03Percentage of patients referred to the Paediatric Physiotherapy Service
who are treated within 8 WeeksC
Adult
AMB 04Percentage of patients referred to the Adult Speech and Language
Therapy Service who are treated within 8 WeeksC
AMB 01Percentage of patients referred to the Paediatric Speech and Language
Therapy Service who are treated within 8 WeeksC
AMB 02Percentage of patients referred to the Paediatric OccupationalTherapy
Service who are treated within 8 WeeksC
LO6Average wait to be seen by the Children's Speech and Language Therapy
ServiceM
Community Care Referral to Treatment
Paediatric
LO4 Average wait to be seen by the Children's Occupational Therapy Service M
LO5 Average wait to be seen by the Children's Physiotherapy Service M
LO2Average wait to be assessed for a wheelchair by the Specialist and Non-
Specialist wheelchair ServiceM
LO3 Average wait to be seen by the Podiatry Service M
PHQ31_05Percentage of people eligible for the NHS Health Check programme that
have received an NHS Health CheckC
Community care
Local 2 Week Offers
LO1 Average wait to be seen by the Adult Physiotherapy Service M
Primary and Community CarePrimary care
PHQ31_04Percentage of people eligible for the NHS Health Check programme who
have been offered an NHS Health CheckC
4
Appendix 3
NHS Gloucestershire 2012/13 Integrated Performance Scorecard
Target2011-12
OutturnApr 2012 May 2012
Jun 2012
Q1Jul 2012 Aug 2012
Sept 2012
Q2Oct 2012 Nov 2012
Dec 2012
Q3Jan 2013 Feb 2013
Mar 2013
Q4
Year to
date
Year end
forecast
Perf.
MeasuredPrincipal Delivery Targets
Unscheduled CareTarget 3,950 766 1,506 2,272 3,505 766 3,505
Actual 4,003 893 893 >3505
Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Actual 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% >95%
Target 939 255 483 711 939 483 939
Actual 1,844 401 820 820 >939
Target 70 18 36 53 70 36 70
Actual 85 23 46 46 >70
Target 3.9% 2.2% 2.3% 2.5% 2.6% 4.5% 9.6%
Actual 4.8% 1.7% 2.2% 3.8% >9.6%
Target N/A 50.0% 53.8% 53.6% 53.3% 51.9% 52.8%
Actual 50.2% 43.8% 50.7% 47.8% >52.8%
GHT 393 33 0 0 6 0 0 39 39 C
GCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
2gether 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
Target 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
GHNHSFT 92.9% 94.5% 94.0% 92.9% 93.3% 93.5% 93.6% >90%
GCS 95.8% 98.1% 97.8% 94.9% 97.9% 96.3% 97.0% >90%
Glos HC target 14 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
Glos HC actual 10 0 2 0 2 1 1 6 >6
GHNHSFT target 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
GHNHSFT actual 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Glos HC target 182 19 16 13 16 13 11 11 11 11 22 20 19 88 182
Acute Hosp 97 6 4 5 10 13 2 40
Comm Hosp 24 1 2 1 2 2 0 8
Community 158 11 10 13 12 14 7 67
Glos HC actual 279 18 16 19 24 29 9 115 >182
GHNHSFT target 73 9 8 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 37 73
GHNHSFT actual 92 6 6 6 8 10 1 37 73
Notes Key to RAG status Key to 'performance measured' Key to abbreviationsPHQ 2012/13 NHS Operating Framework commitments Green On or above plan C = assessed on cumulative performance against plan GNHSFT - Gloucestershire Hospitals NHSFT EC Existing commitment Amber Below plan M = Figure as at end of month GCS - Gloucestershire Care Services
AMB Strategic Health authourity Ambition objective Red Significantly below plan GWAS - Great Western Ambulance ServiceLocal Local target
LO Local offer to Gloucestershire Health Community to reduce waiting times
PHQ28 Number of post 48 hour C Diff infections (Acute Trust) C
PHQ27 Number of post 48 hours MRSA infections post 48 hours (Acute Trust) C
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)
PHQ28 Number of total C Diff infections (Health Community) C
PHQ29 Percentage of all adult inpatients who have had a VTE risk assessment C
Cleanliness and HCAIs
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
PHQ27 Number of MRSA infections (Health Community) C
C
QualityQuality Indicators
PHQ26 Eliminate mixed-sexed accommodation breaches at all providers sites
PHQ13_6The proportion of people who complete therapy who are moving towards
recovery
C
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT)
PHQ13_5The proportion of people who have depression and/or anxiety disorders
who receive psychological therapiesC
PHQ10The number of new cases of psychosis served by the Early Intervention
Team
C
PHQ11 Number of home treatment packages delivered by Crisis Team C
C
Mental Health and Learning DisabilitiesAdults of Working Age
PHQ12Proportion of those patients on a Care Programme Approach (CPA)
discharged from inpatient care who are followed up within 7 days
Public Health
PHQ30Number of clients to the NHS Stop Smoking Service who report that they
are not smoking 4 week after setting a quit date
5
Appendix 4 - Capital Programme 2012/13
Capital Programme 2012/13 Year to date
2012/13
Budget
Forecast
Outturn Variance
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Community Hospitals Central Funding 578 11,146 11,146 0
Operation Capital 3,187 8,028 8,028 0
Other Allocations 0 0 0 0
Additional capital sources 0 0 0 0
Receipts from Sales 0 7,550 4,434 (3,116)
Forecast capital resources 3,765 26,724 23,608 (3,116)
Capital Applications
North Cotswolds and George Moore Clinic 207 1,000 1,000 0
Estate improvements 203 6,753 5,909 844
Newent Health centre 98 200 200 0
Capital grants 2,600 5,028 4,632 396
Tewkesbury Hospital 578 11,746 11,746 0
Berkeley Court 0 0 0 0
Other schemes 79 0 79 (79)
Total capital applications 3,765 24,727 23,566 1,161
Resources less applications 0 1,997 42 (1,955)
Month 6 (September 2012)
Appendix 5 - NHSG Better Payment Practice Code
Appendix 6 - NHSG Cash Reconciliation
Cash Performance Indicators
Month: September Month 6
Cash Limit £'000
Total Annual Cash Limit - anticipated 961,528
Cash Drawn down to date 406,000
Prescribing cash 38,461
Dental Services cash 9,406
Pharmacy cash 9,655
Total charge to cash limit 463,522
% of cash drawn down to total annual cash limit 48.2%
Month end balance in bank account (£'000) 2,706
Month end balance as % of cash limit 0.3%
Cash Reconciliation
£'000
Cash drawn down to date 463,522
Less closing bank balance (2,706)
Cash utilised 460,816
% of adjusted cash utilised to total annual cash limit 47.9%
6 months pro-rata of cash limit 50.0%
Appendix 7 - NHS Gloucestershire Balance Sheet
Description
As at 31st
Aug 2012
As at 31st
March 2012
£'000 £'000
NON CURRENT ASSETS
Property, Plant & Equipment 92,317 93,937
Intangible Assets 135 157
TOTAL NON CURRENT ASSETS 92,452 94,094
CURRENT ASSETS:
Inventories -
Trade & Other Receivables 22,621 16,342
Cash & Cash Equivalents 2,706 183
SUB TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 25,327 16,525
Non Current Assets Held for Sale 5,590 5,590
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 30,917 22,115
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade & Other Payables (64,917) (49,905)
Provisions (567) (1,109)
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES (65,484) (51,014)
NET CURRENT ASSETS/(LIABILITIES) (34,567) (28,899)
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT LIABILITIES 57,885 65,195
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade & Other Payables (205) (205)
Provisions (2,051) (2,051)
Borrowings
TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES (2,256) (2,256)
TOTAL ASSETS EMPLOYED 55,629 62,939
FINANCED BY TAXPAYERS EQUITY:
General Fund / I & E Reserve 43,545 50,855
Revaluation Reserve 12,289 12,289
Local Government Pension Scheme Reserve (205) (205)
TOTAL TAXPAYERS EQUITY 55,629 62,939
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
Ensure that 92% of incomplete pathways have not waited longer than
18 weeks (PHQ21)
92% 95% Achieved
Ensure that 95% of direct access audiology patients are seen within 18
weeks
95% 97.90% Achieved
Comply with 18 week RTT best practice ensuring that:
* Breaches, and the reason for the breach, are reported to the Board
* Monitor and validate all patients that have waited over 35 weeks
* Review all planned waiting lists monthly
* Surgical pathways are reviewed to reviewed to minimise diagnostic
and out patient waiting times ensure
N/A
Ensure choice of a consultant led team where available (PHF07) 95% 100% Achieved - Consultant led teams are on
Choose and Book
Increase the proportion of GP referrals for first out-patient appointment
through Choose and Book (PHF08)
90% 80% Although the standard was not achieved
NHSG performance amongst the best
25 performing PCTs in the country
Meeting veterans’ prosthetic needs
Improving mental health services for veterans (this is included in all
MH specifications in the contract)
Improve cancer services and
prevent people from dying
prematurely
85% of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer within 62-
days of a consultant decision to upgrade their priority status (PHQ05)
85% 100% Achieved
Improve the effectiveness of
screening programmes
Patients should not wait longer than 14 days for their Bowel screening
diagnostic test
90% of waiters >
2 weeks
100% Achieved
Unplanned re-attendance rate - Unplanned re-attendance at A&E
within 7 days of original attendance (including if referred back by
another health professional) - This target relates to Gloucestershire
Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for NHSG and Great Western
Hospitals for NHSS
<5% 2.90%
Left department without being seen rate - This target relates to
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for NHSG and Great
Western Hospitals for NHSS
<5% 1.80%
Time to initial assessment - 95th centile - This target relates to
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for NHSG and Great
Western Hospitals for NHSS
<15 mins 33mins
Time to treatment in department - median - This target relates to
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for NHSG and Great
Western Hospitals for NHSS
<60 mins 58mins
Total time spent in A and E 95th centile should be <4 hours - This
target relates to Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for
NHSG and Great Western Hospitals for NHSS
<4 hrs < 4 hours
Improve access to unscheduled
care also ensuring that national
and local standards are met
Patient Impact Domain - Achieved
Timeliness Domain achieved - despite
time to initial assessment being
underachieved, for performance
management purposes organisations
are considered to have met the
minimum requirements if they have
achieved the threshold in at least one of
the indicators in each domain.
CANCER
UNSCHEDULED CARE
Military and veterans health Complete - This is now in the Local Access Policy of our main acute provider
Achieved / Complete - NHSG ensure that this is embedded as part of each
Service Specification
Maintain national and locally
determined acute care access
standards
There have not been any over 35 week breaches but all of these issues are
reported upon and discussed at the fortnightly RTT meeting with GHNHSFT and
acted upon accordingly
Improve the offer and uptake of
patient choice in line with national
policy
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE Improve data quality and performance against the 4 A&E Quality
Indicators - This target relates to Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust for NHSG and Great Western Hospitals for NHSS
Reduce the number of over 20 minute ambulance handover delays Improvement on
2011/12 outturn
Ambulance delays in Q1 have reduced
by 60% compared to the previous year
Achieved
Improve quality of care by ensuring that plans are in place to monitor
and deliver ongoing improved performance against the Ambulance
Service Quality Indicators
Clinical desk expansion and increase in proportion of patients dealt
with in Hear and Treat category
Improvement
against last year
Qtr
Improvement across all Clinical Desk
activity in Q1
Achieved
Develop plans to implement a NHS111 service to be in place by 1st
April 2013
Ensure a robust Winter Plan is in place to ensure that the
Gloucestershire Health Community are prepared for various winter
pressure scenarios
To provide effective health services to support the Olympic 2012 plan
Assistive Technology Number of Telehealth units in use 2000 (420) 298 Underachieved - However the number of
units in use continues to rise and are
now exceed 500. The trajectory is
under review whilst a new model of
delivery and business model are
developed.
End of life Care Increase the percentage of deaths in place of choice on 2011/12 levels
(deaths at home including care Homes)
> 45% 46.10% Achieved
90% of patients admitted with a stroke should spend at least 80% of
their time on a stroke unit
80% 70.70% Underachieved - Our largest provider
(GHNHSFT) moved their stroke service
to one site in June 2012 and have ring
fenced beds. This has led to an
immediate improvement in performance
and it is anticipated that this target will
be achieved from Q2 onwards.
60% of people at high risk of Stroke, who experience a TIA, should be
assessed and treated within 24 hours
60% 53.70% Underachieved - GHNHSFT have
reorganised their internal processes and
this target is now being achieved in Q2
Improve stroke services
LONG TERM CONDITIONS
Plans have been developed and Project team working towards implementation by
April 2013
Emergency preparedness and
resilience planning
Escalation Plan in Place. Winter Plan is being finalised and agreed amongst all
providers
Achieved
On-going monitoring of the commissioniners report from GWAS continues show
improvements against 2011/12
Improve access to unscheduled
care also ensuring that national
and local standards are met
Although this data is collected national data quality if not very robust and no
targets have be set, therefore no conclusions can be drawn from the performance
data at present.
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE
Increase QOF dementia register to 60%. 60% 47% Steady progress being made across the
county currnetly. New prevealance
indicator due to be released in October
2012 will provide improved ability to
monitor activity
Reduction in admissions for dementia
Ensure that providers are compliant with NICE quality standards
Reduced length of stay for dementia
Gloucestershire
NHSFT target 14
Great Western
Hospital target 17
19 Underachieved - Main causes was
patients wating further NHS Care or
placement. GHNHSFT are currently
scoping the development of a whole
systems approach to patient discharges
and expect performance to improve.
Glos Care
Services target
12 SEQOL
target <15
9 Achieved
Reduction in antipsychotic prescribing
Improve dementia standards to support quality improvements
County wide Community Dementia Nurse service and Dementia
Advisor service
Immunisation rate for children aged 1 who have completed
immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis, Haemophilus
influenzae type b (Hib) - (i.e. all 3 doses of DTaP/IPV/Hib)
95% 97.20% Achieved
Immunisation rate for children aged 2 who have completed
immunisation for pneumococcal infection (i.e. received Pneumococal
booster) (PCV)
95% 97.30% Achieved
Immunisation rate for children aged 2 who have completed
immunisation for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), meningitis C
(MenC) - (ie received Hib/MenC booster)
95% 95.90% Achieved
Immunisation rate for children aged 2 who have completed
immunisation for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) - (i.e. 2 doses of
MMR)
95% 96.90% Achieved
Immunisation rate for children aged 5 who have completed
immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis (DTaP/IPV) (i.e.
all 4 doses)
95% 96.30% Achieved
PRIMARY AND COMMUNITY CARE
Improving health outcomes
through the effective use of
preventative strategies
DEMENTIA
Improve early diagnosis and
treatment of dementia
Community Capacity being strengthened.
Dementia Challenge Bid submitted to enhance rapid response and crisis
management
All providers currently comply with NICE standards
Secondary - Primary Care Audit has shown continual reduction latest figures
shows 10.03% (2012) against 14.3% (2010). Next audit due in Jan 2013
Training and Education Strategy developed to support staff skills development
Completed - Service has been in place since October 2011 working within
Primary Care
LOS for people with Dementia has seen a gradual reduction. The Dementia
Challenge Bid will help to support timely discharge planning
Reduced delayed discharges
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE Immunisation rate for children aged 5 who have completed
immunisation for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) (i.e. 2 doses)
95% 90.80% Underachieved
Immunisation rate for girls aged around 12-13 years who have
completed immunisation for human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) (i.e.
all 3 doses)
90% 84.50% Gaining access to independent and faith
schools remains the key stumbling block
with this standard. GCS are working
through an action plan which includes
one-stop shops in locations such as
youth clubs etc in order to improve this
standard.
Immunisation rate for children aged 13 to 18 who have been
immunised with a booster dose of tetanus, diphtheria and polio
(Td/IPV)
90%
Influenza Immunisation for those in the 65 and over plus at risk group
Percentage uptake
75%
Pneumococcal vaccinations for for those in the 65 and over plus at
risk group Percentage uptake
75% for >65s
70% for at risk
Percentage of children in reception recorded as obese < 9%
Percentage of children in year 6 recorded as obese < 17.7%
Reduce adult obesity by supporting GP clusters to develop/procure
community based adult weight management services
Percentage of pregnant women with a BMI >35 BMI >35
Reduce teenage pregnancy rates
Work towards achieving 2400 positive tests per 100.000 of the 15-24
population by 2013/14
towards 2400 1957 Target measurement change from
coverage to diagnostic rate requires a
redesign of screening activity. This is
taking place during 2012/13.
A designated professional is identified to support local safeguarding
boards
Ensure internal systems are in place to escalate and intervene as
required in response to safeguarding alerts
QUALITY
Safeguarding Completed - CCG lead identified for Safeguarding Adults
Completed - Systems witihin NHSG in place to ensure effective responses to
Safeguarding issues
GP clusters in Stroud and Barkeley Vale and FOD developing / delivering WM
services. There is a lack of consistent cover across the county, a paper is to go to
the CCG in October 2012
Maternal healthy weight programme underway from Autumn 2012. Baseline data
to be establisehd in first instance and then reviewed following development and
delvery of care pathway.
Improve delivery of sexual health
services
Final data is provided annually and gives Gloucestershire a rate of 23.3 at end
December 2010. Provisional data produced indicates a rate of by the ONS
shows Gloucestershire falling to a rate of 22.2 end March 2011 and 19.8 end
June 2011.
2012/13 data not available yet
2012/13 data not available yet
2012/13 data not available yet
Improving health outcomes
through the effective use of
preventative strategies
Data not available
2012/13 data not available yet
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE
Implement government strategy outlined in DoH No Health without
Mental Health document (DH 2011)
Learn lessons from SUIs and specific reviews implementing the
necessary improvements
An increase of the number of users completing treatment on that
recorded in 2011/12
Implement an Alcohol Liaison nurse to reduce repeat admissions to
hospital
Re-provision of substance misuse treatment services - revised model
to deliver the recovery agenda
Provide care closer to home
Reductions in admissions to Hospital
Reduction in length of stay
Oversee the transisiton of infomatics to reciever organisation
Move of public Health Intelligence Unit to Gloucestershire CC -
Integration for the service between Health and Social care
Single Informatics Programme Portfolio for Cluster
Cluster wide data warehouse
Full deployment of NHS mail for all commissioning staff
CLOSED - No Longer being developed due to separate CCG development
between Glousetershire and Swindon. As well as the CSU developing a Data
warehouse which includes, but is not limited to, Swindon and Gloucestershire
All executive and administration staff now have NHS.NET. NHSG have
implemented the procedures, processes and structures in order to roll out NHS
mail throughout the organisation. There is no longer a need to ensure all staff are
on NHS.NET, however should this change then everything is in place to deliver
this.
INFORMATICS
Managing Transition NHSG representatives are currently active in attending or chairing many transition
Project Boards providing help advice where needed.
Achieved - Phase I complete
NHS Gloucestershire (NHSG) joint projects with NHS Swindon are now
designated as NHSG_S on the portfolio. These projects are now integrated into
the monthly reporting of the cluster IM&T portfolio.
LEARNING DISABILITIES
Implement the recommendations
of the Winterbourne Review -
provide care closer to home
Developed Multi-Agency Team to address current interim recommendations.
Awaiting final review to address all recommendations produced.
Decommissioning of 5 beds and service modelling ongoing to encourage patients
in hospital to be cared for closer to home and out of a hospital setting.
Tendering Drug and alcohol
service
Data currently unreliable, expectation information will be produced at end of Q2
Completed - Alcohol Liason Service in place since February 2012
Completed - Tendering process at ITT stage with new contract in place
commencing April 2013
MENTAL HEALTH & DRUG AND ALCOHOL SERVICES
Improving safety and access to
Mental Health Services
Progress is being made to capture the objectives laid out in the No Health without
Mental Health Strategy.
Where necessary Action Plans are put in place and processes are altered to
ensure the issue does not arise again. This is continually monitored by our Risk
and Governance Lead
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE Full inventory linking estates and IT infrastructure and contracts
Full roll-out of Summary care Record project to all practices in
Gloucestershire
Patient Access - Work with practices to understand fully the
implications and requirements for wider patient access in anticipation
of national guidance
Ensure the CCG has the necessary commissioning support services to
support it through authorisation; Support the CCG to agree and adopt
final commissioning support arrangements for taking on full statutory
duties
Support the development of the CSU, ensuring that its staff,
infrastructure and operating processes are professional, fit for purpose,
provide value for money and represent excellent customer service.
Put in place appropriate plans for individuals to support their own
transition beyond the PCT. Manage the transition process lawfully and
sensitively; Provide appropriate support and development opportunities
for staff
Health Visitors Increase WTE health visitors to 92.73 in Gloucestershire by March
2013.
92.73 WTE 76.53 vs target of 82.82 in Q1 Underachieved - NHS Gloucestershire
have agreed a trajectory with
Gloucestershire Care Services to meet
the target.
This has been shared and agreed with
the SHA leads for health visiting.
Although we are currently behind
trajectory for 2012/13 but have recruited
through various sources and expect to
make up lost ground later in the year
when the bulk of our new staff become
available for employment following
completion of their training.
CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE AND MATERNITY
NHSG continues in its
commitment to being an
‘Employer of choice’ within the
local market, recognising that
excellence cannot be achieved
without a motivated, engaged
workforce The PCT has achieved all of the relevant transition milestones set by the DoH
Progress is dependent upon system suppliers’ compliance with national
directives, however this has been influenced as a priority via the GPSoC National
Advisory Group.
WORKFORCE
Work undergoing to populate data within the estates web-based application
(LEFInf) is on track. All networking mapped against estates and changes are
being managed by the operational group quarterly.
46 GP practices are live for summary care records. 10 GP practices do not have
compatible systems for SCR
NHSG have a draft programme in place to roll out SCR to the remaining 30
practices. I have not contacted any of these practices to discuss whether or not
they will activate SCR.
Managing Transition
PRIORITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Plan (Actual) Q1 Performance Comments
NHSG KEY PERFORMANCE DELIVERABLES QUARTER 1 2012-13 NHS Gloucsetershire
PLANNED CARE A 1% increase in the percentage of mothers giving birth normally
based on 2011/12 levels
61.2%
An increase in the normal birth weight based on 2011/12 levels
100% of women who are smoking in pregnancy to be given the optiojn
to be referred to the smoking cessation service
95%
At least 52% of mothers should be breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks. 52% 52% Achieved
Increase breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks by 10% in those areas in
Gloucestershire with the lowest rates in 2011/12
10% 10% Achieved
Carers Strategy Agree and sign off Carers Strategy plan with Local Authorities that:
1)Identifies the financial contribution made to support carers
2)Identifies how much of the total is being spent on carers breaks
3)Identifies an indicative number of breaks that should be available
within funding
CARERS
A joint Carers Commissioning Strategy is being developed between NHS
Gloucestershire and Gloucestershire County Council. Publication of this strategy
on the PCT website has been slightly delayed due to scheduling difficulties
associated with getting sign off through both NHS and GCC processes. The
strategy will be published on the PCT website before the end of October 2012
subject to approval at CCG Shadow Board and GCC cabinet in October.
The strategy covers support services for all carers, including the provision of
carers breaks, and provides a break down of the financial contributions made by
both NHSG and GCC, in line with the Operating Plan requirements.
Maternity Data available at end of Q2
Data available at end of Q2
Data available at end of Q2
Page 1 of 10
Agenda Item 8
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (Shadow Board)
Meeting Date Thursday 15th November 2012 Title QIPP Programme Update
Executive Summary This paper provides the GCCG with an
update of progress against the QIPP themes and main programmes of work, identifying progress to date, key risks and proposed remedial actions.
Key Issues
NHSG has planned to deliver a surplus of £8.9m for the year 2012/13.
Risk Issues: Original Risk Residual Risk
Risk: Non delivery of saving and service redesign plans. Addressed by: Close working with the Project Management Office. Identification of additional saving schemes and slippage within other service area budgets. Current rating: 15 Risk: QIPP programme benefits realisation shifts. Addressed By: Project management and performance data utilised to predict benefits realisation, reduce level of risk within assumption. Work programmes continue to drive harder on savings delivery in year. Current Rating: 8
Financial Impact Not meeting key financial targets Legal Issues(including NHS Constitution)
Not applicable.
Impact on Equality Not applicable.
Page 2 of 10
and Diversity Impact on Health Inequalities
Not applicable.
Impact on Sustainable Development
No sustainable development issues are highlighted by the report.
Patient and Public Involvement
Not applicable.
Recommendation The GCCG are asked to: Take note of the performance
against planned QIPP programme and the proposed remedial actions.
Author Kelly Matthews Designation PMO Lead Sponsoring Director (if not author)
Mary Hutton
Page 3 of 10
Agenda Item 8
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (Shadow Board)
Thursday 15th November 2012
QIPP Programme Update
1 Introduction
1.1 NHS Gloucestershire has a requirement to deliver £29.8m recurrently from
its QIPP programme, to ensure financial stability moving into 2012/13. NHS Gloucestershire are currently developing QIPP plans to support the planned delivery of a surplus £8.9m in 2012-13. To achieve this position commissioner QIPP schemes are being delivered in conjunction with local providers to ensure whole system reform. To support this change NHSG has identified a source of invest to save funding and maintains uncommitted headroom to pump prime service change. This paper and supporting appendices sets out the key progress to date, key risks and proposed remedial actions and provides an overview of the 2012/13 QIPP programme currently being developed.
2 QIPP Programme Overview
2.1
QIPP Themes The QIPP programme covers the breadth of the commissioning agenda and all themes are underpinned by a core principle of care closer to home, in line with the organisational strategy. The rolling QIPP programme has been split into the following themes and programmes.
QIPP Theme Programme
Unscheduled Care & Long Term
Conditions (Including Community Care)
System wide change Pathway Development
(Assessment, Diagnostics and Ambulatory Care)
Self-Care Management and Prevention.
Page 4 of 10
Community Provision
Planned Care
Contract Strategy Service Strategy (including use
of clinical programme approach) Demand Management
Reducing variability in Primary Care
General Medical Services Optometry Dental
Prescribing
Best Practice Waste Medication Medicine Optimisation GP Dispensing Joint Formulary
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities
Services
Improve services for clients with challenging behaviour
Improving Health Inequalities
OOC Placements Eating Disorders Access to Psychological
Therapies
Continuing Healthcare
EoL Domiciliary Care Procurement
Testing Eligibility Reducing Referrals
Non Clinical Estates Back Office
The supporting appendices provide a detailed overview of the programme and individual projects.
Page 5 of 10
3 Finance Savings Plan 2012/13 Against a requirement to deliver £29.8m worth of savings in 2012/13, across the QIPP programme plans are in place to deliver £30.5m of cashable savings, as shown in table below.
The over planning of savings allows for risk mitigation in relation to shifts in the potential realisation. Alongside the savings shown above further benefits in relation to avoiding growth equates to an additional £1.8m of benefit. Based on the application of assumed timescales for delivery of individual QIPP schemes, the table below demonstrates expected phasing of savings delivery by quarter throughout 2012/13. (Note: all figures are shown in £000’s in all tables)
Theme Target SavingsPlanned
Savings (Rec)
Planned Savings (Non
Rec)Grand Total
Savings Gap (In Cash Terms)
Unscheduled Care / Long Term Conditions £5,043
£4,252 £791 £5,043 £0Planned Care £5,691 £5,547 £50 £5,597 -£94Prescribing £7,526 £7,526 £0 £7,526 £0Primary Care £1,500 £0 £1,500 £1,500 £0Community Care £3,000 £3,109 £0 £3,109 £109Mental Health £1,200 £850 £0 £850 -£350Learning Disabilities £2,500 £2,500 £0 £2,500 £0
Continuing Health Care £2,200£2,200 £0 £2,200 £0
Non Clinical £1,150 £0 £650 £650 -£500Contract Contributions £0 £1,523 £0 £1,523 £1,523Grand Total £29,810 £27,507 £2,991 £30,498 £688
Page 6 of 10
Theme Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Unscheduled Care / Long Term Conditions £556 £1,449 £1,589 £1,448
Planned Care £220 £1,382 £1,973 £2,023
Prescribing £4,132 £1,132 £1,132 £1,132
Primary Care £0 £0 £750 £750
Community Care £750 £786 £786 £786
Mental Health £0 £0 £175 £675
Learning Disabilities £0 £833 £833 £833
Continuing Health Care £1,750 £150 £150 £150
Non Clinical £0 £0 £0 £650 Contract Contributions £381 £381 £381 £381
Grand Total £7,788 £6,113 £7,769 £8,828
26% 20% 25% 29%
Savings Position as at end September 2012. At month 6 the projected savings delivery within 2012/13 is £27.2m of cashable savings, as shown in the table below. This is consistent with Month 5.
Theme Target Savings
Assumed Savings (Rec)
Assumed Savings (Non
Rec)
Assumed Grand Total
Savings Gap (In Cash
Terms) Unscheduled Care / Long Term Conditions
£5,043 £2,309 £1,396 £3,705 -£1,338
Planned Care £5,691 £4,139 £25 £4,164 -£1,528
Prescribing £7,526 £7,526 £0 £7,526 £0
Primary Care £1,500 £0 £1,426 £1,426 -£75 Community Care £3,000 £2,487 £0 £2,487 -£513
Mental Health £1,200 £675 £0 £675 -£525
Learning Disabilities £2,500 £2,000 £0 £2,000 -£500
Continuing Health Care
£2,200 £3,080 £0 £3,080 £880
Non Clinical £1,150 £0 £590 £590 -£560 Contract Contributions
£0 £1,500 £0 £1,500 £1,500
Grand Total £29,810 £23,716 £3,436 £27,152 -£2,658
Page 7 of 10
The gap from financial requirement can be addressed with non recurrent contingent resources. The mitigating actions to address the projected £2.7m shortfall on a recurrent basis can be noted as:
1) Continue to increase the planned savings position to over plan beyond requirement; building in contingency for slippage in scheme delivery.
2) Review of in year delivery to assess if the benefits realisation from existing projects can be increased.
3) There is a focus on understanding the increased unscheduled care acute admissions; to ensure QIPP programmes are in place to effectively impact upon the increased spend and ensure services are developed to care for people at right time, in right place.
4) The Your Health, Your Care strategic implementation plan is modelling the impact from the priority areas for change, including key components of the QIPP programme, over the next 5 years to ensure recurrent change into 2013/14 and beyond.
4
Current Key Risks and Proposed Remedial Actions The key risks from across the QIPP programme can be noted within the table below, alongside their remedial actions:
Page 8 of 10
Key Risks (L) (1-5)
(C) (1-5)
Total Remedial Actions
Insufficient plans for reassurance regarding financial stability moving into 2013/14.
3 5 15
Director and clinical leadership at theme level, further projects in development for additional saving. Contingency and non-recurrent slippage identified to support delivery of control total. Further ideas under development.
Insufficient engagement across the health community with regards to savings plans.
2 4 8
Theme directors responsible for ensuring contractual engagement, QIPP health community groups in place to ensure senior clinical, management and financial sign up. Joint approach to inclusion in contracts for 2012/13. Alignment to Gloucestershire Strategy for Care.
Insufficient detail to map impact in relation to workforce and provider capacity.
3 4 12
Business case process requires that all projects are fully scoped for service outcomes including workforce and bed impact. Routine performance management of both business case preparation and project implementation ensures consistent and targeted focus on these areas. The Resources Steering Group routinely review system workforce and capacity impacts as part of the strategic review for the health community operating framework and plan.
5. QIPP Programme Updates A robust programme management process has been developed to ensure governance mechanisms are in place to performance manage delivery.
Page 9 of 10
Programmes and projects are assessed in relation to the following 2 perspectives:
Project Management. Robustness of project plan and ability to deliver against key milestones for implementation.
Benefits realisation. Ability to deliver financial outcome as proposed within the original project plan assumptions.
Currently there are 71 QIPP projects included within the programme, assigned as Raised, Open (Implementation) and Open (Performance Management) of which the % assessed as red, amber of green rating for project management are shown in the chart below.
Since the previous report the projects assessed as green have increased to 33% (from 31%), amber risk rating has decreased to 50% (from 53%) and a subsequent slight increase in red schemes to 14% (from 13%).
Red14%
Amber50%
Green33%
n/a3%
Project Management
Page 10 of 10
Since the previous report the projects assessed as green remained at 44%, amber risk rating has increased to 48% (from 47%) and a subsequent slight decrease in red schemes to 6% (from 7%). There is a noted maintained position benefits realisation as this is currently consistent with Month 5 analysis. The current highlight programme report is attached within appendix A, detailing:
Key Achievements Red or significant amber risk programme areas and mitigating actions.
5 Supporting Documents
Appendix 1: QIPP Highlight Performance Report (October 2012)
Red6%
Amber48%
Green44%
N/A2%
Benefits Realisation (by value £)
Page 1 08/11/2012
Green
Amber
Red
Green
Amber
Red
Significant
Amber Risks
Project
Status:
Project documentation well developed programme of
work on track.
Further work required within project documentation,
some slippage in milestones.
Limited project documentation completed or project
implementation delayed.
Advice &
Guidance
Benefits
Realisation:
KPIs on track, high level of confidence in ability to
deliver outcome, contract mechanisms are in place.
The scheme is on track but concerns around benefits
to be realised.
Limited or no confidence in delivery of outcome.
Red ProgrammeReasons and Actions
Community IV Service
(Planned Procedures)
Operational pathway issues still occuring and therefore less activity in the
community service than expected.
Case mix and delivery model being reviewed by Gloucestershire Care
Services including service proposal for remainder of 2012/13.
Programme Management Office
QIPP Highlight Performance Report October 2012
Overview
Key
Significant Progress to Date
Planned Care(Red rating based on both project management and benefits realisation
assessment, dependent on size, priority and complexity of workstream)
GP Peer Review
GP Peer Review (3 specialty min.) went live countywide in November 2011,
with all practices in the county signed up to a form of peer review (in house
design or NHSG QoF QP Scheme). Performance data from Nov -11 to
September - 12 indicates a 7% reduction in GP referrals for those specialties
selected. The 12-13 scheme will aim to expand to all practices peer reviewing
all specialty referrals by September 2012 - currently 86% of practices have
signed up to the LES scheme.
Consultant to
Consultant Referrals
Consultant to Consultant Referral Policy was not agreed with GHNHSFT
in 2011-12 and therefore benefits were not realised. Project has been
rolled forward for 2012-13, 100% risk share to NHSG, £250k saving.
Assurance will be required as to approach to agreeing policy with
GHNHSFT and timescale.
NHS Gloucestershire programme lead is currently exploring opportunity
across all 'other' referrals i.e. midwifery alongside additional service
redesign plans.
Prescribing growth rate currently -0.95%, 5th best in South West region.
T&O Programme
NHSG are committed to developing a joint programme with GHNHSFT to
deliver agreed financial impact alongside alignment to the savings and
18wk RTT target. Generic MSK pathway mapping and specific pathway
mapping for spinal pathways have been developed and considered by
the CPG. The CPG have also supported the development of a trial
programme including Advice & Guidance and triage, for 2013/14 ahead
of procurement to commission an integrated service model in future
years.
Risk Stratification
Advice and Guidance commenced with Dermatology in June 2012. Initial
uptake and feed back has been positive in both primary and secondary care. At
the end of September 2012 100 referrals for Dermatology Advice & Guidance
had been received, 57% were returned to primary care and 29% onwardly
referred to secondary care. The joint working group (NHSG & GHNHSFT) have
idenitifed Haematology and Renal as the next specialties to go live in
November 2012.
NHS Gloucestershire CCG have endorsed procurement of risk stratification tool
to support development of integrated community teams
CHCIn terms of benefits realisation this QIPP Programme is forecast to over deliver
against the initial target set.
Enhanced Community
Provision
The Enhanced Community Provision Programme equates to £2.4m of
the USC programme in 2012-13, with a two thirds risk share to NHSG.
Projects within the programme include Living Well and Use Of
Community Hospital Beds. The overall delivery of this programme is
amber reflecting the USC activity position to date,
Telehealth (LTC Theme)
As at 24th October 2012, 601 patients have been referred to telehealth
within the county - the deployment of units across Gloucestershire
remains challenging. A robust communication and engagement plan is
in place and will be need to be further developed throughout 2012-13 in
order to reach 2000 unit deployment trajectory. Additional resource has
been agreed to support clinical engagement. GCS are on track with
recommendations for referral target.Prescribing
Red 14%
Amber 50%
Green 33%
n/a 3%
Project Management
Red 14%
Amber 41%
Green 34%
Est 0% n/a
11%
Benefits Realisation (no. of projects)
Red 6%
Amber 48%
Green 44%
N/A 2%
Benefits Realisation (by value £)
N:\Cluster Governance\6) Gloucestershire CCG\2012\Meeting Papers\2012-11 November\AI 8 - 1 20121101 Appendix A QIPP Programme Overview
Telephone renumbering project NHS Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire Care Services and Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust telephone numbers are changing on 26th November. The 0845 prefix which is currently used will change to an 0300 prefix. The DoH has mandated that this change is made to ensure that patients and the public pay local call rates when phoning the NHS. 0845 numbers are charged at higher rates, whilst 0300 numbers are charged at local rates. Extension numbers for individuals and departments (the last four digits) will remain largely unchanged – it is just the first part of the number which will change. 0845 numbers will be redirected for a period of six months to ensure a smooth transition. In practice, numbers will change as follows: Organisation Current number New number Extension (4
digits) NHS Gloucestershire 0845 422 0300 421 unchanged Gloucestershire Care Services*
0845 659 0300 421 unchanged
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
0845 422 0300 422 unchanged
*In addition to the 0845 number changes, some geographical and some 0345 numbers used by Gloucestershire Care Services’ community hospitals will also be changing Telephone numbers have been allocated for Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group and the NHS National Commissioning Board Local Area Team, and these will be listed in the BT phone directory (published in February 2013) along with the Dental Helpline and 3 Counties Cancer Network numbers. A communications programme will be carried out to ensure that these changes are promoted effectively across the county. This will include advertising in local media and communication with primary care, stakeholders and the public. A webpage explaining the changes and providing detailed information will be hosted on the NHS Gloucestershire website.