globalization in denmark

7/29/2019 Globalization in Denmark

1/22

CONTINUITY AND CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS IN DENMARK 1

Executive summary

In Denmark, globalization has resulted to the redundancy of the national

boundaries for the economic transactions. The views regarding the effects of the globalization

are diverse. According to some arguments, global competition is presented as a force which

reduces the spending and intervention of the state. The forces include policies that are

market-friendly and the state of the modern welfare. Garrett and Lange (1991, p.23).

Some argue that both social and political globalization impacts are dependent on the

institutions within the State. Hirst (1999, p. 69). Most literature material perceives growth of

globalization as empirical due to the various specific trajectories in the national welfare and

their dependence on path. Esping-Andersen (1996, p.45).

The economic globalization usually constrains the policies in vulnerable

nations. The review of the economic policies in fiscal spending, taxation and industrial

policies are sometimes can be easily manoeuvred. Weiss (2002). According to her,

globalization is does not constrain the policies but the domestic within the domestic

institutions. Denmark has a declining economy in social democracy due to the higher tax

imposition, the spending regime, and the strong policies in the labour market, the high

equality in income and equality in the distribution of the wealth. Danish industrial structure is

believed to be lagging, vulnerable and very pre-Fordist, particularly when compared to the

Scandinavian neighbours Mjoset (1987, p.67).

However, a recent model review indicates that despite of the problems

associated with globalization, Denmark maintains high aspirations in social democracy and

welfare. Nielsen (2001, p.46). Studies indicate that there have been intensive efforts in


2/22


defending of the fiscal policies and the welfare aspirations of the state.Benner (2000, p.49).

Some studies have given more attention on the strengths related with the arrangements in

Denmark in mediating between the interest groups and the stakeholders and Small and

Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Denmark.Amin & Thomas (1998, p.32). The

continuous adoption of the societal cohesion context enhances flexibility and cooperation.

Lundvall (2002, p.57). The Danish Miracle successful characteristics are a reflection of the

small size. Nielsen (2003, p.80). Though considered a Coordinated Market Economy,

Denmark has in the recent past developed a more hybrid market economy by decentralizing

collective learning and decision making, and increasing the exposure of actors to market

forces.

Due to this change, Denmark continues to pose a paradox for the varieties of

capitalism literature and continues to raise serious concerns about one of the variety of

capitalisms most important logical tenets. This report is on the globalization impacts on the

political economy in Denmark.

In the first part of the report, the specific features of the Danish economy are

outlined and the various challenges that characterizes globalization. The second part consists

of the discussion on the globalization impacts on the economic policies, the industrial

structure and on the welfare state. The conclusion contains a critical evaluation of the

effectiveness of the response by Denmark and the political repercussions resulting from the

response are demonstrated.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The political economy in Denmark is characterized by social democracy Glyn (1995, p.25),

the Scandinavian model Jespersen (1999, p.54), and its welfare state regime Esping-Andersen


3/22


(1990, p.76). Muller- Armack likens it to the social market economy. Muller-Armack (1956,

p.38). The social democracy in Denmark in areas of elected government and political core

capitalism reform objectives are meant to reduce unemployment, income inequality and

improve the generous social services. Denmark is universalistic in nature on welfare state

aspirations and it resonates with the classical description of the social market economy by

Muller-Armack. This is usually based on the market competition which enhances growth and

productivity, facilitates the intervention of the state in income redistribution, and it ensures

fairness in markets so as to achieve the social objectives.

Generally, research shows that these terms are true only up to a certain extent.

In Denmark, the dominance of the social democracy is uncontested as compared to other

Scandinavian countries. Some of the key aspects that have been neglected include the policies

on full employment. According to Katzenstein (1985, p.65), the democratic corporatism

provides a better description that distinctively characterizes Danish political economy. It

involves capturing the adaptation practices on the world market changes, and this is based on

consensual political culture. These economies are usually small and should adapt to the

changes. The interest group meditation is crucial in adaptation and compensation process.

Studies reveal that Danish economy relies greatly on bargaining and negotiation. In

negotiated economy, many institutions and other inter-institutional networks will engage

problem solving debates and make negotiations which result to conflict resolution. The

interpretation framework is based on relatively homogeneous population and on rough power

symmetry in the capital-labour relations.

The negotiated economy in Denmark is based on self-organization principles,

egalitarianism, consensus and compromise approaches. Capital formation, labour, and well

established government was not experienced in Denmark due to the presence of strong

countervailing forces. The centralized corporatist model was mainly impossible due to the


4/22


nature of the state: it was highly decentralized. However, the availability of the pluralistic and

localized reform process enhanced the acceptance of the co-determination principles and

division of responsibilities. Basically, the industrial structure in Denmark is mostly

dominated by the SMEs and the economy specializes in low value added, and the strong

international competition. Research show that the development in food and pharmaceutical

industries has not been Cleary defined. Maskell (1998, p.41). Denmark dependent highly on

the SMEs with the basic low-tech and medium-tech fields, hence the growth in the

international markets is limited. The domination by social democrats in Denmark was

significant, and conservative government election between 1982 and 1993 was not successful

in legacy changing of economic governance and social democratic politics. In 2001, there

was formation of a coalition between the social democrats and the social liberals.

However, there should be no overestimation of the discretionary power by the

national Danish governments. Centre parties have been in the forefront in providing the

coalition votes necessary for governance leading to the emergence of strong consensual

policies despite of the governing partys political spectrum. The consensus history in

Denmark has since 2002 been very uncertain. For once after fifty years, now Denmark has a

majority in the right-wing government which is independent of centre partys moderating

influence. The hybridization thus incorporates both the Liberal Market Economies (LME)

and Coordinated Market Economies (CME) characteristics and being a CME, Denmark has

elements typically found in LMEs that has been incorporated into its structure in ways that

have enhanced its socioeconomic performance. This has been clearly demonstrated by

institutions governing vocational training and skills formation, labour markets and industrial

policy.

In studying labour markets, Denmark clearly exhibited traits associated with

CMEs by having almost 80% of all workers unionized and were covered by the collective


5/22


bargaining agreements (CBAs) reached through corporatist institutions. On the other hand,

employees in the private sector had rather limited levels of employment protection thus

employers had an upper hand depending on the market signals, to hire and fire workers. In

addition, decentralization of bargaining regarding job training, work scheduling, especially to

the level of individual firms, represented a move in the direction of LMEs. Thus, Denmarks

overall level of employment protection changed from that of pure CMEs to move closer to

pure LMEs.

Historically, Denmark is highlighted as one of the easiest in business

conducting. At the initial stages, Denmark had already been integrated internationally. The

Danish firms used to operate subsidiaries and affiliates abroad. Various latent internal and

external forces challenged the success. Until 1970, Denmark was a homogenous country after

which the influx of the working immigrants affected its economy. With the shifting of the

demographics, Danes started questioning the beneficiaries of the taxes and payments from

social security. Danes believed that their transition from the close knit community threatened

their democratic values and exposed them to the diverse society. The concern by the Danes

was on the sustenance of their welfare.

In 2008, Denmark entered into a recession. According to Lars Lkke Rasmusse,

Denmark was supposed to strike a balance between the globalization and social welfare of the

state. There was an active subsidization in alternative energy innovation by Denmark after the

economic recession in 1970. According to Paul Krugman, the shifts in relative demand in

labour; both skilled and unskilled, leading to unemployment and tensions in welfare state

policies.

According to Peter Katzenstein, the economic downswings in the world markets

contributed greatly to the adjustment of policies so as to sustain globalization. Some

economists argue the enhancement of the adaptability by the welfare states in traditional


6/22


unemployment. The present day Denmark reflects independence and a considerable decline

in the geographical size. Denmark transformed from a superpower under the Northern Europe

to a prosperous nation. The Vikings used techniques that were very advanced when they were

building ship. Vikings were feared since they were used for warfare and in looting throughout

the whole period. Both the 16th and 17th centuries saw the stability in the economy.

Influence of globalization on policies and decision making processes in Denmark

Globalization can be perceived as techniques used in intensifying the worldwide

interconnections of the economic activities. According Appelt & Weiss (2001, p. 15),

globalization is ideally a discursive process that is based on neo-liberalism, evidenced by the

neo-liberal discourse in competition, the comparative advantages, and the investment friendly

environments.

The Economic Policy

Globalization reduced significantly the repertoire and the efficiency of the

national economic policies. Mostly, the instruments used in traditional macroeconomic

disappeared and effectiveness of other instruments adversely declined. The global capital

markets hindered the effective control of the money supply and the interest rates. This

undermined the effectiveness for the national monetary policy. Moreover, at national level,

the exchange rate management became vulnerable to the speculative capital movements. As a

result, the economic policy makers aim at accommodating expectations by the big investors

internationally, in their consideration of the most appropriate measures in the economic

policy. This has proved more imperative than the domestic political considerations.

The perception of European Union as the supranational body limits the plans by

the EU countries in using the instruments in macroeconomic policy. The Keynesian demand


7/22


management effectiveness has reduced due to spill over demand effects of the expansion

across the borders. Some industrial policy instruments have been ineffective in transfer

production and undermine the efforts towards the support of the "national champions".

The Global Trade

The Free trade free capital availability improves the international competition

and as well as inducing pressures on OECD member countries in pursuing the industrial

restructuring measures. Cow-cost producers competition based on the modern technologies

in production has been very vital. New market economies affect the restructuring processes.

The effects competitive ventures are grave and the individual nation states should cautiously

reallocate the resources thus shifting the international markets conditions. The pressure

towards industrial upgrade in Denmark is especially high due to the low and medium tech

specialization.

The Social Policies

Domestic socio-economic adjustment encompasses shifting of the resources

from shrinking sectors to expanding sector. As a result, there is greater need to compensate so

as to alleviate adjustment process. The compensation capacities appear to be declining. The

curtailed efficiency and the autonomy in the management of the macroeconomic policy have

undermined the nation state policies on full employment.

This was considered as first most line of the defence from poverty in

Keynesian model of welfare state. Mishra (1999, p.48). Secondly, the effectiveness in the

social support defence has drastically reduced due to the decline in effectiveness of taxation

of the increased mobility of the tax base national governments. Moreover, globalization is

believed to undermine the extent to which the political basis can chip in and facilitate the


8/22


funding of the welfare state.

Usually, it is said that employers demand the reduction in taxes and

contribution in social security. They argue that these two impedes their competitiveness

globally. On the other hand, the political forces will resist the tax cuts and weaken the decline

in social contributions. Some other barriers arise due to the integration of the EU monetary

union and common market. The increased barriers are as a result of the unavailability of

common integration of social policy. These lead to downward spiralling in social standards

even as the nation counters the competition in the international market.

The Ideological Change

Despite of the factual effects of globalization, there are also the indirect effects

that involve the change in the strategic arena as well as the payoffs from various actions. The

reorientation in political perspectives as well as changes in the shared mental models follows.

The ideological forces play a key role in apparent convergence of the political and the social

agendas in the commitment towards the price stability, privatization, low deficits and

taxation, and expenditure cuts measures in welfare and social support. In the non-liberal

discourse, the Danish socio-economic development is affected when the factual pressures are

limited. The consequences are real, particularly if those involved believe in globalization.

Ganssmann (2001, p.48).

Some other impacts of globalization include the decline in the wages due to the

increase in the international competitions. Lack of skilled labour exposed the high-cost

countries to severe competitive pressures. Furthermore, globalization is believed to reinforce

the disintegration of the pre-existing bargains. The Danish "negotiated economy" context on

future survival of the institutions that have been established raises contentions. Kjaer &

Pedersen (200l,p.45). The rate of unemployment is higher than average among the low-


9/22


skilled workers. However, efforts were made towards the prevention of their social and

economic marginalization. This was done through income support supplement in 1990s and it

was done through a special program on democratic workforce.

Response of Denmark

The globalization pressures affected the Danish government capacity in

promotion of the national prosperity through the macroeconomic policy. In 1984, Denmark

made remarkable efforts in de-regulation of the credit and liberalization of the capital

movements. After this period, Denmark has not been able to regulate and manipulate credit,

though the effects of these two instruments are minimal.

Denmark declined EURO currency and did not join European Monetary Union

(EMU). Despite of this, its exchange rates and other monetary policies are linked to EU,

which is based on EMU membership. Their interest rates were higher than from other

members of the union. The influence of Denmark on decision-making processes in European

Central Bank is limited, and is prone to speculative attacks. As a result, Denmark relies on

policies that are more prudent policies than in cases where it could be part of EMU.

The severity of the speculative attacks suffered by Denmark was not as serious

as it was in Britain and Sweden. By 1982, the Denmarks exchange rate was linked fully to

Germans Mark then to EURO. The Danish governments were strongly committed to the

fixed rate in boosting the employment through budget deficits and devaluations of the

currency.

The rate of unemployment was very high in Denmark than it was in the other

countries. The regime of the economic policy acted as a surrender to the capitalism and

departure from the definitions of the Scandinavian model. Globalization has resulted to a


10/22


significant reduction in Keynesian demand management. Not all autonomy was lost, recent

developments depict macroeconomic policy scope which support employment. Between 1993

and 1994, the democratic government revived the stagnant economy using different policies

that relied on existing manoeuvring room based on fixed exchange rate during the

international growth regime. Combination of these measures with innovative arrangements

on paid leave, a declining level in unemployment resulted in Denmark. Loftager & Madsen

(1997, p.36). The labour market supply played key roles towards the success and it was clear

that the demand management could be effective even in employment policies on condition

that they be conducted on criteria of anti-inflationary and fixed exchange rate regime.

Sources depict that apart from macroeconomic policies being limited in achieving the

economic growth, they contribute to unemployment and they are usually irrelevant.

Efforts are made towards improving of quality in production sector especially in

technology, knowledge skills and the social skills. The formulation of policies in industry,

labour market, education and in training facilitated the improvement of the economic

performance. The Schumpeterianism; new regime replaced the Keynesianism, and this was

characterized by the supply side measures substituting the demand side measure which has

boosted competitiveness and restructuring Jessop (2000, p.58). The adoption of these

structural policies by Denmark took place earlier and in 1980s, some major technological

policies were initiated which acted as guidelines in the economic policies. Nielsen (1991,

p.71).

There was an introduction of structural monitoring system by the government in

1997 meant to enhance the structural competitiveness. It also reduced structural

unemployment. As a result, new polices emerged in industrial and labour market sectors.

The traditional macroeconomic policies were greatly undermined by the increased pressures

from globalization. The management of the aggregate demand is still limited despite of the


11/22


institution constrain from the deficit limit that was imposed by EU Stability. The effects on

smaller countries lie Denmark were minimal. The smallness and openness restricted the

autonomy. The growth in structural policies in Denmark has been remarkable and its progress

in economic policy is commendable.

GLOBAL TRADE

The global industrial reorganization facilitated specialization that contributed to

structural changes between and within industrial trade economies. Held et al (1999, p.186).

Denmark showed such a trend in its economy, where this Danish economy did not suffer

from the high competitions of the low-wage countries. In 2000, the 88% of its proceedings

were obtained from trade with other OECD countries, while about 68% was from the EU.

Trade with industrialized economies from Asia (NIEs) constituted 1.4% and 3.8% from the

CEE countries.

Increase in the trade between Denmark and NIEs was negligible in the last

decade while that with the CEE grew gradually from 1.4% to 3.8%. The trade between

Denmark to CEE was characterized by Danish exports increasing significantly than the

imports (Rasmussen and Andersen 2002). Despite of the occurrence of specialization pattern,

competition was still heightened in the low-cost countries.

Denmark can be classified as one of the countries with the highest level of

specialization. The Danish exports were highest in food products and less of pharmaceuticals

and furniture. Various challenges ere experienced in pharmaceuticals, biomedical electronics

and wireless communication. The industrial structure in Denmark was dominated by

international level sectors that were characterized by low research, growth and wages. This

weakened the already low specialization degree of the high-tech products. Despite of these

challenges, the maintenance and improvement of relative positions in Denmark was a success


12/22


and it was measured in GDP per capita. Flexibility and adaptability in the use of resources

enhanced the diffusion of new technologies in both the low tech and the medium tech

industries. This period saw advanced production equipment and improved manufacturing

methods in foodstuffs, in furniture and in clothing. This contributed significantly to the

expertise in design and marketing. Lundvall (2002, p.98). The assets in experience-based

knowledge in the traditional industries are limited to R&D, but social interaction on the

organizations boundaries, on the departments and in the management levels dominated. The

system is capable of supporting the interaction between education and labour market. The

structural reforms were aimed at facilitating capabilities and flexibility in labour markets.

The Danish society was characterized by the strong cohesion where the firms

took advantage of the relatively huge stock in social capital and the mutual trust. This results

to a reduction of costs in the firm transaction and enhances the adaptation, cooperation and

learning among the firms. The localized learning was on the basis of shared trust acted major

competitive assets in Denmark. Maskell et al. (1999, p.76). The degree of direct investments

in the international level was very low. Danish Competition Authority (1999,p.180). This low

degree in outward foreign investment reflected the small sized nature of Danish firms and the

large multinationals in smaller numbers than in Sweden and Netherlands. The SMEs

predominance made many foreign firms being uninterested in making any investments in

Denmark.

Also, the investment by foreign firms was affected by the challenges in tapping

the competitive sources of Danish economy. The experience-based knowledge entailed the

context tacit knowledge. Despite of the availability of such knowledge amongst the insiders,

its transfer is usually hard. It was crucial that availability of any specialization in the high

tech products be backed-up by codified (R&D) knowledge. In Denmark, the previous two

decades were characterized by increase in the foreign investments. In Denmark, the FDIs


13/22


share quadrupled as that of GDP. Danish Government (1997, p. 53).

Contrary to Swedish firms, the Danish firms were dependent on the national

innovation systems in technological and organization adaptation, hence they preferred voice

to exit.

Areas of improvement: welfare restructuring

Despite of globalization, the social spending, which is a percentage of GDP increased

substantially. The high expenditure by the welfare is usually incompatible with the

globalizations economic growth. The welfare provision evidence is not systematic and it

affects the performance of trade. Pfaller et al.(1991, p.90). The availability of strong welfare

programs is believed to enhance high level social capita as well as creation of strong social

support in social capital maintenance. Selle (1999, p.80). It is believed that there is no

correlation between employment and taxation.

The case was true for Denmark in that Denmark is highly dependent on the

income taxes and the contributions from other employers, the availability of the security in

modest job, and finally, the strong decentralized and collective bargaining was very strong.

The welfare state in Denmark was described as being compatible with other competitive

economies. The migration and integration of the European affected the Danish approach

critically. Apart from the ideological and structural changes, the political repercussions

constituted majority of the decisive impacts in Denmark.

The government in Denmark sided with Britain in the opposition evidenced by

rejection of the Maastricht treaty by the Danish electorate. As a result, Denmarks situation

became unsustainable due to exemption from the dynamic developments within the EU. Most

political parties and various interest groups favoured Denmark. The elites and ordinary

nationals from Denmark split. The emergent split was because of divergence in the


14/22


perceptions toward globalization. Elites considered globalization being an opportunity but

other citizens considered it to be an obstacle.

CONCLUSION

The negotiated economy in Denmark mediated the effects of globalization

pressures particularly in the national context. Facts on globalization influence within the

Danish economy are minimal but there is an ideological evidence of the impacts of neo-

liberal ideas regarding the e policy discourse. The trade regulations in EU through some

international bodies such as WTO denote alterations and renegotiations in state sovereignty.

Denmark was one of pioneers in enactment of the adjustments from autonomy loss before

popularity of globalization. The transition of Denmark from a Keynesian demand to the

Schumpeterian supply side, some challenges in globalization were solved.

The economy of Denmark is faced by low unemployment levels, dynamism in

industrial networks, stability in public finances and strong currency. Generally, Denmark

does not have large companies, the high tech industries are incomprehensive and the

influential interest group are of high tax burden.

Remarkably, a country with well planned welfare related expenditures will have

the equality in transition from the demand side to the supply side free of welfare

retrenchment and without causing any discrepancies in wages. Despite of the open market

economy in Denmark, there have been obstacles when dealing with the outsiders. The non-

liberal ideologies by the public did not alter the social consensus in Denmark but it changed

negotiated economy practices. Apparent split between the elites and the ordinary people

evidenced the negative ideological impacts of the neo-liberal ideas in public discourse of

Denmark.

The integrative democracy which involves strong participatory elements is a


15/22


guarantee of strong relationship between elite and ordinary discourses in a negotiated

economy. The split that occurred latest was a potentially disruptive phenomenon. Generally,

the growing globalization in Denmark can be likened to a sinking ship from a rough sea. In

order to prevent any wreckage, a consensus on the intended direction and collaboration

amongst the crew should be reached through solidarity and equality. Globalization can be

likened to a rough sea and efforts to steer the ship is from the political elite. The elites

express their eagerness in exploiting the new opportunities but ordinary citizens will be

worried about the costs.

The political party support has been facilitated by the strategic positioning of

the party in the defending side of the ordinary person from the effects of globalization. The

opposition by the EU has reinforced the xenophobic reactions in the Danish public. As a

result, the downgrading of the welfare benefits may be necessary in coping up with the

asylum seekers. The threats in the welfare state and they have contributed to inactiveness in

the defensive posture for the active initiatives. As a result, the defensive posture by the

politicians in Denmark influences the transformations in the society.

The activities of parties are an example of a compromise on strict measures so

as to meet deadlines. The compromise hinders the efforts to make any remarkable progress

by the government. Denmark, being one of the CMEs has employed tighter monetary policy,

deficit reduction, an undervalued currency, increased debt-driven consumer demand and the

pursuit of stable exchange rates for her success.


16/22


REFERENCES

Amin, A. and Thomas, D. (1998) "The Negotiated Economy: State and Civic Institutions in

Denmark," Economy and Society 25(2): 255-281.

Andersen, T. M. (2002) "Internationaliseringog Velfaerdssamfund", Politica 34(1): 24-37.

Appelt, E. and Weiss, A. (eds) (2001) Globalisierung und der Angriff auf die europaischen

Wohlfahrtsstaaten, Argument-Sonderband Neue Folge AS 279. Berlin and Hamburg.

Benner. M. (1997) The Politics of Growth, Lund: Arkiv.

Benner, M. and Vad, T. (2000) "Sweden and Denmark: Defending the Welfare State," in F.

W. Scharpf and V. A. Schmidt (eds) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy:

Volume II. Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University

Press: 399-466.

Berger, S. and Dore, R. (eds) (1996) National Diversity and Global Capitalism, Ithaca:

Cornell University Press.

Cox, R. (1997) "Democracy in Hard Times. Economic Globalization and the Limits to

Liberal Democracy," in A. G. McGrew (ed.) The Transformation of Democracy?

Globalization and Territorial Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press: 49-72.

Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping

Convergence and Diversity, London: Sage.

Danish Competition Authority (Konkurrencestyrelsen) (1999) Konkurrenceredegoerelsen,

Copenhagen: Konkurrencestyrelsen.

Danish Government (1997) A Structural Monitoring System for Denmark, Copenhagen: The

Danish Government.

Deppe, F. (2001) "Vom keynesianischen Wohlfahrtsstaat zum neoliberalen

Wettbewerbsregime," in E. Appelt and A. Weiss (eds) Globalisierung und der Angriff


17/22


auf die europaischen Wohlfahrtsstaaten, Berlin and Hamburg: Argument-Sonderband

Neue Folge AS 279:21-46.

Edquist, C. and Lundvall. B.-A. (1993) "Comparing the Danish and the Swedish Systems of

Innovation," in R. R. Nelson (ed.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative

Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 265-298.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity

Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) (1996) Welfare States in Transition National Adaptation in Global

Economies, London: Sage.

Ganssmann, H. (2001) "Soziale Sicherheit und Kapitalmobilitat--Hat der Sozialstaat ein

Standortproblem?", in E. Appelt and A. Weiss (eds) Globalisieruag und der Angriff

auf die europaischen Wohlfahrtsstaaten, Berlin and Hamburg: Argument-Sonderband


Garrett, G. and Lange, P. (1991) "Political Responses to Interdependence: What's 'Left' for

the Left?", International Organization 45(4): 539-64.

Gill, S. (1995) "Globalization, Market Civilization, and the Disciplinary Neoliberalism,"

Millennium 24(3): 399-423.

Glyn, A. (1995) "Social Democracy and Full Employment," New Left Review 211(1): 33-55.

Harvey, D. (1997) "Betreff Globalisierung," in S. Becker, T. Sablowski and W. Schumm

(eds) Jenseits der Nationalokonomie? Weltwirtschaft und Nationalstaat zwischen

Globalisierung und Regionalisierung, Berlin and Hamburg: Argument-Sonderband


Held, D. and McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations--

Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999) Globalization in Question--The International Economy


18/22


and the Possibilities of Governance, Polity Press: Cambridge.

Jespersen, J. (1999) "Scandinavian Model," in P. A. O'Hara (ed.) Encyclopedia of Political

Economy, London and New York: Routledge: 1005-1007.

Jessop, B. (2000) "Restructuring the Welfare State, Re-Ordering Welfare Strategies, Re-

Visioning the Welfare Society," in B. Greve (ed.) What Constitutes a Good Society?,

Basingstoke: Macmillan: 13-34.

Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity Press. Katzenstein. P.

(1985) Small States in World Markets, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kjaer, P. and Pedersen, O. K. (2001) "Translating Liberalization--Neoliberalism in the

Danish Negotiated Economy," in J. L. Campbell and O. K. Pedersen (eds) The Rise of

Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University

Press: 219-248.

Loftager, J. and Madsen, P. K. (1997) "Denmark," in H. Compton (ed.) The New Politics of

Unemployment: Radical policy initiatives in Western Europe, London and New York:

Routledge: 123-145.

Lundvall, B.-A. (2002) Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Maskell, P. (1998) "Learning in the Village Economy of Denmark--the Role of Institutions

and Policy in Sustaining Competitiveness," in H. Braczyk, P. Cooke, and M.

Heidenreich (eds) Regional Innovation Systems--The Role of Governance in a

Globalized World. London: UCL Press: 190-213.

Maskell, P. (ed.) (1999) Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development:

Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies, Routledge: London.

Ministry of Business and Industry (1996) Technological and Organizational Change.

Implications for Labour Demand. Enterprise Performance and Industrial Policy. The

OECD Jobs Strategy, Country Report Denmark, Ministry of Business and Industry,


19/22


Copenhagen.

Mishra, R. (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Mjoset, L. (1987) "Nordic Economic Policies in the 1970s and 1980s," International

Organization 41 (3): 403-56.

Muller-Armack, A. (1989) "The Meaning of the Social Market Economy," in A. Peacock and

H. Willgerodt (eds) Germany's Social Market Economy Origins and Evolution,

London: Macmillan: 82-86.

Nielsen, K. (1991) "Learning to Manage the Supply-side: Flexibility and Stability in

Denmark," in B. Jessop (ed.) The Politics of Flexibility. Restructuring State and

Industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 282-313.

Nielsen, K. (2000) "From Macro-economic to Structural Policy: New Trends in Economic

and Industrial Policies in Denmark," in B. Greve (ed.) What Constitutes a Good

Society, London: Macmillan: 77-97.

Nielsen, K. (2001) "Discourses of Globalization and Competitiveness in the Negotiated

Economy," in W. Eisner, A. Biesecker and K. Grenzdorffer (eds) Okonomische

BeWertungen in gesellschaftlichen Prozessen--Markt--Macht--Diskurs, Herbolzheim:

Centaurus: 21-52.

Nielsen, K. (2003) "Dansk mirakel nat litenhet omvandleats till styrka, Axess," 2:22-24:

English website version ( www.axess.se ) "Why Small is Beautiful in the Danish

Economy".

Nielsen, K. and Pedersen, O. K. (1991) "From the Mixed Economy to the Negotiated

Economy: The Scandinavian Countries." in: R. M. Coughlin (ed.) Morality,

Rationality, and Efficiency--New Perspectives on Socio-Economics, New York and

London: M. E. Sharpe: 145-165.

Pierson, P. (1996) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of


20/22


Retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pfaller, A., Gough, I. and Therborn, G. (1991) Can the Welfare State Compete?, Basingstoke:

Macmillan.

Rasmussen, F. and Andersen, P. (2002) Globaliseringens oekonomiske konsekvenser for

Danmark, Aarhus: Maktudredningen.

Regeringen--Danish Government (1995) "Velstand og Velfaerd--en analysesammenfatning,"

Erhvervsminsteriet, Finansministeriet, Copenhagen: Statsministeriet og

Oekonomiministeriet.

Regeringen--Danish Government (1997) Globalisering og Dansk Oekomnni. Copenhagen:

Finansministriet.

Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far?, Washington D.C.: Institute for

International Economics.

Scharpf, F. W. (1996) "Politische Optionen im erweiterten Binnenmarkt," in M. Jachtenfuchs

and B. Kohler-Koch (eds) Europaische Integration, Opladen: Leske and Budrich: 109-

140.

Scharpf, F. W. (2000) "Economic Changes, Vulnerabilities, and Institutional Capabilities," in

F. W. Scharpf and V. A. Schmidt (eds) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy--

Volume I. From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Oxford: Oxford University Press:

21-124.

Schwartz, H. (1994) "Small States in Big Trouble. State Reorganization in Australia,

Denmark, New Zealand and Sweden in the 1980s," World Politics 46(July): 527-55.

Selle, P. (1999) "The Transformation of the Voluntary Sector in Norway: a Decline in Social

Capital?" in J. Van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, P. Whiteley and H. Kenman (eds)

Social Capital and European Democracy, London and New York: Routledge.

Streeck, W. (1999) Korporatismus in Deutschland Zwischen Nationalstaat und Europaischer


21/22


Union, Frankfurt a.M. and New York: Campus Verlag.

Swank, D. (2002) "Withering Welfare," Globalisation, Political Economic Institutions, and

the Foundation of Contemporary Capitalism," in L. Weiss (ed.) States in the Global

Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press: 58-82.

Torfing, J. (1999) "Workfare with Welfare," Journal of European Social Policy, 9(1): 1-31.

Weiss, L. (2002) "Introduction. Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,'" in L. Weiss (ed.)

States in the Global Economy. Bringing Domestic Institutions Back hi. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press: 1-33.


22/22


Klaus Nielsen (1) and Stefan Kesting (2)

(1) Roskilde University Denmark and Birkbeck, University of London and (2) University of

Bremen

Klaus Nielsen is Professor in Social Science (Institutional theory) at the University of

Roskilde, Denmark, and Senior Lecturer in Management at Birkbeck, University of London,

UK. He has published several books including Institutions and Economic Change. New

Perspectives on Markets, Firms and Technologies (1998) (with Bjorn Johnson) and Strategic

Choice and Path-Dependency in Post-Socialism (1995) (with Jerzy Hausner and Bob Jessop).

In the context of a new Book Series New Developments in Institutional Theory (Edward

Elgar) of which he is the editor, two of his forthcoming books are Institutionalism in

Economics and Sociology. Variety, Dialogue and Future Challenges and Social Capital, Trust

and Institutions.

Stefan Kesting holds a Ph.D. in economics and is working as lecturer and researcher at the

University of Bremen, Germany. As an institutional and social economist, he has published

articles on power and language in economics. He is author of a textbook on microeconomics

in German Mikookonomik (Oldenbourg 2003, with A. Biesecker) and is currently writing a

book on welfare economics.

COPYRIGHT 2003 Routledge

Document RVSE000020040211dz9100005

globalization in denmark

Documents