globalization disruptedwill policy shift to boost infrastructure? if so, global trade in ‘heavy...

26
Globalization Disrupted Will world trade continue to disappoint? Mark Cliffe Chief Economist, ING Group December 2014

Upload: others

Post on 31-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

Globalization Disrupted Will world trade continue to disappoint?

Mark Cliffe Chief Economist, ING Group December 2014

Page 2: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

1

China sets the pace… …as the developed world struggles with the post-crisis legacy

1

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Index1Q08=100

UK

Eurozone

US

India

Russia

Brazil

China

Japan

Output 2008-14 (Real GDP)

Page 3: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

2

World trade – a partial recovery US exports do relatively well…

Source: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, ONS

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

US goods exports

1991-2007 trend

World merchandise trade

Apr. 2008 = 100

Page 4: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

3

Emerging markets account for ½ of world trade

World Merchandise Exports Share in world total, 2013

Source: OE, ING calculations. Note: Asia/Pacific excludes Japan, North America = US & Canada, Emerging Europe includes Russia & Turkey, MENA = Middle East & North Africa, LatAm = Latin America, Other Advanced Economies = Australia, Japan & New Zealand..

Page 5: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

4

0

5

10

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

World Seaborne Trade Total goods unloaded, in trillions of tons

Source: UNCTAD, ING estimates for 2013 and 2014

Asia dominates seaborne trade Reflecting appetite for bulk and manufacturing expansion

North America

Western Europe

Rest of World

Developed Asia

Developing Asia

Developing Europe

Page 6: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

5

World trade – no longer outpacing output Growth has disappointed since the financial crisis

• Prior to the global financial crisis world trade grew twice as fast as GDP…

• …its share of world GDP almost doubled in less than 20 years

• After its rebound following the crisis-induced plunge, trade is growing no faster than GDP

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1991 1996 2001 2006 2011

World GDP

World exports/World GDP

World exports

Jan 1991 = 100

Page 7: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

6

The problem is mainly in developed markets Asia pulls ahead

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

91 93 94 95 96 97 98 00 01 02 03 04 05 07 08 09 10 11 12

Export volume index

(2005=100)Asia

CEE

Latam

AdvancedEconomies

Euro Area

AfricaMiddle East

Page 8: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

7

Recent slowdown in Latam and Europe Russia/Ukraine tension hurts CEE and Eurozone

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14

2014 GDP consensus forecasts (YoY%)

Asia Pacific

Latin America

Eastern Europe

Source: Consensus Economics

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14

2015 GDP consensus forecasts (YoY%)

UK

Canada

Eurozone

Japan

US

Source: Consensus Economics

Page 9: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

8

Current Account imbalances narrow Deficit countries aim to be German, and China rebalances…

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Current account (% of GDP)

Germany

NL

UK

Spain

China

US

Japan

Page 10: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

9

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

Mar 08 Mar 09 Mar 10 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14

What’s been driving US growth?

US GDP breakdown – 1Q2008 = 100 • Exports have led the way

out of US recession • But consumer spending

and business investment have kept pace with overall GDP

• Imports have not, and government spending still depressed

• Construction rebounding, but from low levels

• Inventories (not shown) have been very important

Exports

Bus. Invest

Consumption

GDP

Imports

Gov’t Residential

Structures

Page 11: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

10

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Eurozone recovery gains some traction But the recovery is still uneven and fragile

NL

Portugal

Italy

Germany

Greece

Ireland

France

Real gross domestic product (1 Q 2008 = 100)

Belgium

Spain

UK

Finland

Page 12: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

11

Exports – key to recovery Spain even outpaces Germany

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Export volumes (Goods and services)1Q08 = 100

Germany

NL

UK

Spain

France

Italy

Poland

Belgium

Page 13: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

12

85

95

105

115

125

07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Finland

UKAustria

Neth.Germany

FranceItalyEuro area

US

Portugal

Spain

Ireland

Index - 2008 = 100

Relative unit labour cost comparison

Eurozone Periphery - improving competitiveness Cost cutting helps them reverse previous losses

• Crisis has led to reforms in parts of the Eurozone periphery…

• …enabling them to play catch up with “core” Europe

• Recent euro decline will help the whole region

Page 14: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

13

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Real gross domestic product1Q08 = 100

The Asian growth divide

1

Thailand

Taiwan

South Korea

India

Indonesia

China

Japan

Singapore

Page 15: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

14

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Export volumes (Goods and services)1Q08 = 100

Chinese exports have more competition…

Thailand

Taiwan

South Korea

India

Indonesia

China

Japan

Singapore

Page 16: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

15

Why is the US re-shoring?

111

109

88

82

49

37 29

Lead time

Quality

Rising wages / currency

Freight costs

Total costs

Inventory

Supply chain risk

Main negative reasons for re-shoring

Number of case studies

Source: Re-shoring initiative

87

80

79

57

49 skilled workforce

image / brand

Govt incentives

Automation / 3Dprinting

US energy prices

Top 5 Positive reasons for re-shoring

Number of case studies

Source: Re-shoring initiative

• Others include:

• Delivery, communications, environment, control, travel cost / time, price

• Others include:

• Re-design, productivity, R&D, Infrastructure, customer responsiveness, real estate cost, customs

Page 17: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

16

Is it FDI?.....No

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-50.0

-30.0

-10.0

10.0

30.0

50.0

70.0

90.0

110.0

95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13

UK FDI as % Exports, lhs

US FDI as % Exports, rhs

% %• FDI is arguably a

substitute for trade…

• …(though empirical evidence suggests it supports trade)…

• Either way, it has been ordinary in the US…

• …and falling in the UK

Page 18: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

17

Is it re-shoring (on-shoring)? Could be….

• Most of these have relocated from China…

• …or elsewhere in Asia

• (NCR from China, other Asia and Brazil)

Page 19: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

18

Disruptive technologies – light and local Many new technologies reduce the need for movement of goods

An impressive list of disruptive technologies… 1. Internet of Things 2. Mobile internet 3. 3D Printing 4. Knowledge work automation 5. Advanced Robotics 6. Biotechnology and genomics 7. Nano-technology and advanced materials 8. Cloud technology 9. Self-driving vehicles 10. Renewable energy 11. Energy storage 12. Advanced oil and gas recovery Source: McKinsey Global Institute/ING

Page 20: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

19

11%

12%

13%

14%

15%

16%

17%

18%

19%

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Exports to the EU as proportion of total USexports

Exports to the US as proportion of totalEurozone exports

Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Economically beneficial, but political divisions delay progress…

Proportion of trade between US and EU has decreased…

Reduce Tariffs to encourage Trade

in Goods

• Reduced tariffs boost competition and trade • Particularly in agricultural products, textiles and

clothing and footwear (tariffs on shoes as high as 66% in the US1)

Harmonise regulation and

industry standards

• e.g. Joint car safety and drug registration regulations would prevent double tests in the US and EU.

Relax “Buy America”

procurement rules

• Currently only 32% of US Federal procurement market is open to EU businesses.

0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6%

Services-only

Procurement-only

Tariff-only

Comprehensive(Conservative)

Comprehensive(Ambitious)

Estimated increase in EU GDP from TTIP

Source: European Commission 1 Source: BBC

Page 21: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

20

Trans-Pacific Partnership Political momentum softens here as well…

Japan

US

Australia

Singapore/Vietnam

Chile/Peru

NZ

MX

Canada

Malaysia

40% of Global Trade1

1 Source: USTR

Stricter IP protection

Reduce unfair treatment of state-owned enterprises

Investor-state dispute settlement for unfair treatment

Exceptions for some industries (e.g Japanese Agricultural)

But tricky negotiations… - Reluctance to reduce state-

controlled industry - Conflict over FX intervention - Compromise on protected

industries contentious

Page 22: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

21

Net exports boosted by energy “independence” Ukraine crisis may add impetus to the US energy revolution

• The US Current account deficit is now only about 2.4% GDP, down from 6% in 2006 • The crisis has “helped” by curtailing imports, but so too has the falling energy deficit… • …in particular, the gas deficit has turned into a surplus • Ukraine crisis could accelerate moves to step up US energy exports

-45000

-40000

-35000

-30000

-25000

-20000

-15000

-10000

-5000

0

5000

-45000

-40000

-35000

-30000

-25000

-20000

-15000

-10000

-5000

0

5000

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Crude oil Fuel oil

Natural gas LNG

Other petroleum

$mnUS trade deficit – total and petroleum US energy trade deficit - breakdown

-250000

-200000

-150000

-100000

-50000

0

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Ex petroleum, goodsand services balance

Petroleum balance

$mn, monthly

Page 23: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

22

Will policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit

Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained global infrastructure spending

S&P and McKinsey estimate $57 trillion, or $3.2 trillion a year, will be needed to finance infrastructure development up to 2030

Continued weak growth and low financing costs could lead to a policy shift to address this…

…boosting global trade

Page 24: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

23

Conclusions • Post the financial crisis, trade is no longer growing twice as fast as output

• Growth in the developed markets is slower, reflecting sluggish domestic demand…

• …especially in big deficit nations, which are trying to emulate Germany’s export success…

• …with varying degrees of success – US and Spain have done well

• Offshoring and re-imports have waned

• Disruptive technologies may also reduce trade in the long term

• But there could be positives from…

1. Trade liberalisation and the spreading of FDI from China

2. New energy flows, especially from the US

3. A policy shift to boost infrastructure

Page 25: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

24

Developed Markets Title Telephone Email

London Mark Cliffe Head of Global Markets Research 44 20 7767 6283 [email protected] Rob Carnell Chief International Economist 44 20 7767 6909 [email protected] James Knightley Senior Economist, UK, US, $ Bloc 44 20 7767 6614 [email protected]

Chris Turner Global Head of Strategy and Head of EMEA and LATAM Research 44 20 7767 1610 [email protected] Petr Krpata Foreign Exchange Strategist 44 20 7767 6561 [email protected]

Padhraic Garvey Global Head of Developed Markets Debt Strategy 44 20 7767 8057 [email protected] Aengus McMahon Head of European High Yield Research 44 20 7767 8044 [email protected]

Amsterdam Maarten Leen Head of Macro Economics 31 20 563 4406 [email protected] Martin van Vliet Senior Economist, Eurozone 31 20 563 9528 [email protected] Teunis Brosens Senior Economist, US 31 20 563 6167 [email protected] Dimitry Fleming Senior Economist, Netherlands 31 20 563 9497 [email protected] Jeroen van den Broek Head of Developed Markets Strategy and Research 31 20 563 8959 [email protected] Mark Harmer Head of Developed Markets Credit Research 31 20 563 8964 [email protected] Maureen Schuller Head of Covered Bond Strategy 31 20 563 8941 [email protected] Hamza Khan Senior Commodities Strategist 31 20 563 8958 [email protected] Suvi Kosonen Senior Credit Analyst, Banks 31 20 563 8029 [email protected] Nadège Tillier Senior Credit Analyst, Utilities and Energy 31 20 563 8943 [email protected] Judith van der Ven Senior Credit Analyst, TMT and High Yield 31 20 563 8961 [email protected] Job Veenendaal Credit Analyst, Consumer Products and Retail 31 20 563 8956 [email protected] Roelof-Jan van den Akker Technical Analyst 31 20 563 8178 [email protected] Brussels Peter Vanden Houte Chief Economist, Belgium, Eurozone 32 2 547 8009 [email protected] Julien Manceaux Economist, France, Belgium, Switzerland 32 2 547 3350 [email protected] Philippe Ledent Economist, Belgium, Luxembourg 32 2 547 3161 [email protected] Anthony Baert Economist, Ireland, Slovenia, Portugal 32 2 547 3995 [email protected]

Frankfurt Carsten Brzeski Chief Economist, Germany, Austria 49 69 27 222 64455 [email protected]

Milan Paolo Pizzoli Senior Economist, EMU, Italy, Greece 39 02 55226 2468 [email protected] Emerging Markets Title Telephone Email

New York Gustavo Rangel Chief Economist, LATAM 1 646 424 6464 [email protected]

London Dorothee Gasser-Châteauvieux Senior Economist, EMEA 44 20 7767 6023 [email protected] Deanie Haugaard Jensen EM Economist, Baltics, Croatia 44 20 7767 5340 [email protected] Czech Republic Jakub Seidler Senior Economist, Czech Republic 420 257 47 4432 [email protected]

Hungary András Balatoni Economist, Hungary 36 1 235 8757 andrá[email protected]

India Upasna Bhardwaj Economist, India 91 22 3309 5718 [email protected]

Philippines Joey Cuyegkeng Economist, Philippines 632 479 8855 [email protected]

Poland Rafal Benecki Chief Economist, Poland 48 22 820 4696 [email protected] Grzegorz Ogonek Economist, Poland 48 22 820 4608 [email protected]

Romania Vlad Muscalu Senior Economist, Romania 40 21 209 1393 [email protected]

Russia Dmitry Polevoy Senior Economist, Russia & CIS 7 495 771 7994 [email protected] Egor Fedorov Senior Credit Analyst, Russia & CIS 7 495 755 5480 [email protected]

Singapore Tim Condon Head of Research & Chief Economist, Asia 65 6232 6020 [email protected] Prakash Sakpal Economist, Asia 65 6232 6181 [email protected] Turkey Muhammet Mercan Chief Economist, Turkey 90 212 329 0751 [email protected].

Research analyst contacts

Page 26: Globalization DisruptedWill policy shift to boost infrastructure? If so, global trade in ‘heavy stuff’ could benefit Fiscal austerity, bank deleveraging and derisking has constrained

25

Disclosures and disclaimer ANALYST CERTIFICATION The analyst(s) who prepared this presentation hereby certifies that the views expressed in this presentation accurately reflect his/her personal views about the subject securities or issuers and no part of his/her compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the inclusion of specific recommendations or views in this presentation. IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES Company disclosures are available from the disclosures page on our website at http://research.ing.com. The remuneration of research analysts is not tied to specific investment banking transactions performed by ING Group although it is based in part on overall revenues, to which investment banking contribute. Securities prices: Prices are taken as of the previous day’s close on the home market unless otherwise stated. Conflicts of interest policy. ING manages conflicts of interest arising as a result of the preparation and publication of research through its use of internal databases, notifications by the relevant employees and Chinese walls as monitored by ING Compliance. For further details see our research policies page at http://research.ing.com. Research analyst(s): The research analyst(s) for this presentation may not be registered/qualified as a research analyst with the NYSE and/or NASD. The research analyst(s) for this presentation may not be an associated person of ING Financial Markets LLC and therefore may not be subject to Rule 2711 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by the research analyst’s account. FOREIGN AFFILIATES DISCLOSURES Each ING legal entity which produces research is a subsidiary, branch or affiliate of ING Bank N.V. See back page for the addresses and primary securities regulator for each of these entities. DISCLAIMER This presentation has been prepared on behalf of ING (being for this purpose the commercial banking business of ING Bank NV and certain of its subsidiary companies) solely for the information of its clients. ING forms part of ING Group (being for this purpose ING Groep NV and its subsidiary and affiliated companies). It is not investment advice or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information contained herein is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, ING makes no representation that it is accurate or complete. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. ING Group and any of its officers, employees, related and discretionary accounts may, to the extent not disclosed above and to the extent permitted by law, have long or short positions or may otherwise be interested in any transactions or investments (including derivatives) referred to in this presentation. In addition, ING Group may provide banking, insurance or asset management services for, or solicit such business from, any company referred to in this presentation. Neither ING Group nor any of its officers or employees accepts any liability for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this presentation or its contents. Copyright and database rights protection exists in this presentation and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved. Any investments referred to herein may involve significant risk, are not necessarily available in all jurisdictions, may be illiquid and may not be suitable for all investors. The value of, or income from, any investments referred to herein may fluctuate and/or be affected by changes in exchange rates. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors should make their own investigations and investment decisions without relying on this presentation. Only investors with sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to evaluate the merits and risks should consider an investment in any issuer or market discussed herein and other persons should not take any action on the basis of this presentation. Clients should contact analysts at, and execute transactions through, an ING entity in their home jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. Additional information is available on request. Country-specific disclosures: EEA: This presentation constitutes “investment research” for the purposes of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and as such contains an objective or independent explanation of the matters contained herein. Any recommendations contained in this presentation must not be relied on as investment advice based on the recipient’s personal circumstances. If further clarification is required on words or phrases used in this presentation, the recipient is recommended to seek independent legal or financial advice. Hong Kong: This presentation is distributed in Hong Kong by ING Bank N.V., Hong Kong Branch which is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) (“SFO”). This document does not constitute a solicitation or an offer of securities or an invitation to the public within the meaning of the SFO. This presentation is to be circulated only to “professional investors” as defined in the SFO. India: Any recipient of this presentation wanting additional information or to effect any transaction in Indian securities or financial instruments mentioned herein must do so by contacting a representative of ING Vysya Bank Limited (“ING Vysya”) which is responsible for distribution of this presentation in India. ING Vysya is an affiliated company of ING. ING Vysya does not accept liability for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of information provided in this presentation. Italy: This presentation is issued in Italy only to persons described in Article No. 31 of Consob Regulation No. 11522/98. Singapore: This document is provided in Singapore by or through ING Bank N.V., Singapore Branch and is provided only to accredited investors, expert investors and institutional investors, as defined in Section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act, Cap. 289. If you are an accredited investor or expert investor, please be informed that in ING’s dealings with you, ING is relying on the following exemptions to the Financial Advisers Act, Cap. 110 (“FAA”): (1) the exemption in Regulation 33 of the Financial Advisers Regulations (“FAR”), which exempts ING from complying with Section 25 of the FAA on disclosure of product information to clients; (2) the exemption set out in Regulation 34 of the FAR, which exempts ING from complying with Section 27 of the FAA on recommendations; and (3) the exemption set out in Regulation 35 of the FAR, which exempts ING from complying with Section 36 of the FAA on disclosure of certain interests in securities. United Kingdom: This presentation is issued in the United Kingdom by ING Bank N.V., London Branch only to persons described in Articles 19, 47 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 and is not intended to be distributed, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons (including private investors). United States: Any person wishing to discuss this presentation or effect transactions in any security discussed herein should contact ING Financial Markets LLC, which is a member of the NYSE, FINRA and SIPC and part of ING, and which has accepted responsibility for the distribution of this presentation in the United States under applicable requirements. The distribution of this presentation in other jurisdictions may be restricted by law or regulation and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions.