global scale e nergy f luxes: comparison of observational estimates and model simulations

58
Global Scale Energy Fluxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations Aaron Donohoe -- MIT David Battisti -- UW CERES Science Team Meeting 4/23/2014

Upload: ramona

Post on 07-Jan-2016

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Global Scale E nergy F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations. Aaron Donohoe -- MIT David Battisti -- UW CERES Science Team Meeting 4/23/2014. Global mean energy balance. The Earth receives energy from the sun (and reflects back some portion of it) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Global Scale Energy Fluxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model

Simulations

Aaron Donohoe -- MITDavid Battisti -- UW

CERES Science Team Meeting4/23/2014

Page 2: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Global mean energy balance

• The Earth receives energy from the sun (and reflects back some portion of it)

• To come into energy balance (equilibrium) the Earth must emit the same amount of energy it receives

IncidentSolar

Reflected Emitted

Earth

Incident – Reflected = Emitted

S(1-αP) = σTe4

Page 3: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Equator-to-pole contrast

•The tropics receive more solar radiation than the high latitudes (extratropics)•To come to equilibrium, the tropics must either emit excess radiation or transport energy to the extratropics

Tropics Extratropics

Incident Reflected

Emitted

Net

Page 4: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Seasonal Cycle

• Seasonal variations in solar insolation are of order 1 in the extratropics• How much energy goes into the atmosphere versus the ocean to drive seasonal variations in temperature and circulation?

Solar Atmos.-Ocean

Exchange Emitted

Heat Transport

Summer

Absorbed

Transmitted

Energy gain Energy loss

Winter

Heating Cooling

Page 5: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Outline1. What determines the Earth’s planetary

albedo? (How much solar radiation gets reflected)

2. What determines the meridional heat transport in the climate system?

3. How do seasonal variations in solar insolation lead to atmospheric heating?

Earth

Tropics Extratropics

Page 6: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

1 : What determines the Earth’s planetary albedo? (solar radiation reflected at top of atmosphere)

Earth’s Surface

Atmosphere

Solar Incident

Reflected by Atmosphere

Reflected by Surface

Page 7: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Simplified (isotropic) shortwave radiation model

S = incident

R = cloud reflection

A = absorption

α = surface albedo

(UNKNOWNS)

AtmosphericContributionTo planetary

Albedo

SurfaceContributionTo planetary

Albedo

Page 8: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Partitioning of planetary albedo into atmospheric and surface components

Earth’s Surface

Atmosphere

Solar Incident

Reflected by Atmosphere

Reflected by Surface

αP = αP,ATMOS + αP,SURF

αP,ATMOS = R

αP,SURF = α(1-R-A)2

(1-αR)

Page 9: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Observed (CERES) surface and atmospheric contribution to planetary albedo

Page 10: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Observed Surface and atmospheric contribution to planetary albedo

αP,SURF = α(1-R-A)2 (1-αR)

αP,SURF

α (surface albedo)

Surface albedo and surface contribution to planetary albedo (α and αP,SURF)

Page 11: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Observed Global Mean Planetary Albedoand it atmospheric/surface Partitioning

Page 12: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Planetary Albedo Partitioning:Comparison of models (CMIP3 pre-

industrial) and observations (CERES)

Page 13: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Histogram of hemispheric average planetary albedo

Observations

(CERES)

10 W m-2

Page 14: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Hemispheric average planetary albedo partitioning in climate models

• Inter-model spread in Hemispheric average planetary albedo is a consequence of differences in cloud reflection

• Surface albedo makes a much smaller contribution to basic state albedo, model bias and inter-model spread

Page 15: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Inter-hemispheric energy transport and the location of tropical precipitation

ITCZ location and atmospheric heat transport across the equator (AHTEQ)are both a consequence of the Hadley cell location-> The atmosphere moves energy away from the ITCZ

The inter-model spread in AHTEQ and ITCZ location are strongly correlated

Page 16: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Hemispheric contrast of radiation and ITCZ location

ITCZ lives in the hemisphere where the atmosphere is heated more strongly-> In observations, the radiative input to each hemisphere is nearly equal and ITCZ is North of the equator because of Northward ocean heat transport

Model biases is planetary albedo lead to ITCZ biases-> SH absorbs too much shortwave and ITCZ is too far south

Heating of SH

Page 17: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

2 : What determines meridional heat transport?

Tropics Extratropics

Incident Reflected

Emitted

Net

Page 18: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Understanding heat transport

5.8 PW

Heat Transport = -

8.2 PW 2.4 PW

ASR* OLR*

Page 19: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

ASR*, OLR*, MHT, and the tropical/extratropical energy budget

All arrows are relative to the global average

Tropics

ASR* OLR*

MHT

To extratropics

MHT =

ASR* - OLR*

8.2 PW2.4 PW

5.8 PW

Page 20: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

ASR*, OLR*, MHTDynamic Limit

All arrows are relative to the global average

Tropics

ASR*

MHT

To extratropics

MHT = ASR*

8.2 PW

8.2 PW

OLR* = 0

9.0 PW 8.2 PW

Page 21: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

ASR*, OLR*, MHTRadiative Limit

All arrows are relative to the global average

Tropics

ASR*

MHT

To extratropics

MHT = 0 ,

ASR* = OLR*

8.2 PW

0 PW

OLR*8.2 PW

Page 22: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Heat Transport In Climate Models(CMIP3)

Observations

Peak Heat Transport Histograms

Page 23: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Model heat transport spread in terms of OLR* and ASR*

Page 24: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Understanding ASR*

SH NH

Page 25: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

ASR* and planetary albedo

Page 26: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

What determines the equator-to-pole contrast of planetary albedo?

Earth’s Surface

Atmosphere

Solar Incident

Reflected by Atmosphere

Reflected by Surface

Page 27: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Surface and atmospheric contributions to the equator-to-pole contrast in absorbed shortwave radiation

Page 28: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Planetary Albedo Partitioning

Page 29: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Atmospheric and Surface reflection contribution to ASR*

MHT spread

Cloud Reflection

Pol

ewar

d E

nerg

y T

rans

port

Equator to pole contrast in clouds

Equator to pole contrast of absorbed

shortwave

Poleward Energy Transport

Page 30: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

How is the atmosphere heated in the annual average?

Kiehl and Trenberth 1997

30% reflected

20% absorbed atmosphere

50% transmittedTo surface

50% net fluxFrom surfaceTo atmosphere

3. The seasonal cycle of atmospheric heating and temperature

Page 31: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Annual mean heating summary30% reflected

atmosphere

surface

20% absorbed atmosphere

50% transmittedTo surface 50% net flux from surface

to atmosphere

Surface energy balance (absorbed solar flux = upward flux to the atmosphere) requires that the ratio of heating from direct absorption to surface energy fluxes isapproximately:

atmospheric absorption (SW) /atmospheric transmissivity(SW) => direct absorption accounts for 30% of atmospheric heating

Page 32: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Spatial structure of atmospheric heatingAnnual Average

Page 33: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Limiting models of seasonal atmospheric heating

DEEPOCEAN

SW absorbingatmosphere

SW transparentatmosphere

Shallow ocean

SW fluxTurbulent + LWSurface flux

Heated from above Heated from below

Page 34: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Atmospheric energy budget

Surface

SW transparentatmosphere

Net SW TOA

Conventional This studyOLR

Heat TransportDivergence

Net energy fluxThrough surface

Storage

Net energy flux through surface =Solar + turbulent + LW

Surface

Atmospheric SW absorption (SWABS)

Heat TransportDivergence

Storage

OLR

Surface heatFlux (SHF)

SHF = turbulent + LW=> Energy exchange between surface and atmosphere

Page 35: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Atmospheric energy budgetAtmospheric energy budget -- Observations

Storage Heat Transport Divergence

Radiative Fluxes from CERESDynamic fluxes and storage are calculated from ERA-40 reanalysis

Atmos. Surface exchange (SHF) as RESIDUAL

Page 36: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Seasonal Atmospheric

Heating

ANNUAL MEAN IS

REMOVED

Page 37: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Seasonal Amplitude of heating

Define seasonal amplitude as:

Amplitude of annual harmonicIn phase with the insolation

Takes into account magnitude and phase

Þ Positive amplifies seasonal cycleÞ Negative reduces seasonal cycle

Annual Mean

Page 38: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

=> Solid lines = observations => Shading is ±1σ about CMIP3 ensemble mean

The seasonal heating of the atmosphere in climate models

Seasonal AmplitudeIn phase with sunSurface fluxes and

shortwave absorption are calculated directly from model output

Atmospheric heat transport as a residual

Page 39: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Define a seasonal amplitudeVertical structure of SW absorptionGFDL Model

Seasonal amplitude In the extratropics

Water Vapor

Ozone

Page 40: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Structure of seasonal amplitude in temperature

Seasonal cycle is surface amplified where the surface heat fluxes contribute to seasonal heating (over land)

Page 41: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Conclusions

Atmosphere

Solar Incident

Reflected by Atmosphere

Reflected by Surface

1. Global mean planetary albedo is primarily (88%) due to atmospheric reflection and only secondarily (12%) due to surface reflection

-> Climatology and model spread -> Hemispheric contrast in planetary albedo sets ITCZ location

2. Poleward energy transport varies by 20% in climate models and is a consequence of simulated clouds

3. The seasonal heating of the atmosphere is due to shortwave heating of the atmosphere and is opposed by surface fluxes (contrast to annual mean)

Page 42: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Extras

Page 43: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

CO2 doubling expectationsSummer schematic

Open ocean

Surface fluxSWABS

Sea ice

Moistening and meltingÞ Mores seasonal energy

input directly into the atmosphere (SWABS)

Þ Less seasonal energy input at the surface (SHF)

Page 44: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations
Page 45: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Water Vapor as a SW Absorber

(Figure: Robert RhodeGlobal Warming Art Project)

Page 46: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Reflects the combined contributions of:1. Melting sea ice

=> reduced seasonal cycle of temperature at the surface2. Increased SWABS due to atmospheric moistening => enhanced seasonal cycle of temperature aloft

Page 47: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Meridional structure of atmospheric attenuation

Page 48: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Planetary Albedo and Surface Albedo

Page 49: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Meridional profile of albedo in all simiulations

Page 50: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Inter-model spread in albedo by region

Page 51: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

2XCO2 Planetary Albedo

Page 52: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

2XCO2 Planetary Albedo

Page 53: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Carl’s Question: Planetary Albedo Partitioning Error Bars

Page 54: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Planetary Albedo Partition: Sensitivity to shortwave absorption assumptions

Page 55: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

What determines OLR*?

Why don’t differences in ASR* and OLR* compensate for each other?

(Kiehl, 1994)

Longwave Cloud Forcing

LWCF = OLRCLEAR - OLR

Page 56: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Contributions to ASR* spread

Page 57: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Hemispheric Contrast Of TOA RadiationNH reflects more SW radiation in the subtropical deserts. SH reflects more SW in the extratropics due to clouds in the Southern Ocean

The NH is warmer (more OLR), especially in the polar latitudes

Planetary albedo is partitioned into cloud and surface contributions via the method of Donohoe and Battisti (2011)

Page 58: Global Scale  E nergy  F luxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations

Define a seasonal amplitudeVertical structure of SW absorption

50 100Heating Rate (W m-2 )

150

GFDL ModelSeasonal amplitude In the extratropics

Chou Lee (1996)Water vapor absorption

In the summer