global fund-supported partnerships
DESCRIPTION
GLOBAL FUND-SUPPORTED PARTNERSHIPS. DO THEY WORK IN FAILED STATES? WV SOMALIA TB PROGRAM EXPERIENCE By Dr Vianney Rusagara, MD - World Vision Somalia and Dr Milton Amayun, MD - World Vision International. Somalia - Country profile. Located in the horn of Africa - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GLOBAL FUND-SUPPORTED
PARTNERSHIPSDO THEY WORK IN FAILED STATES?
WV SOMALIA TB PROGRAM EXPERIENCE
By
Dr Vianney Rusagara, MD - World Vision Somaliaand
Dr Milton Amayun, MD - World Vision International
Somalia - Country profile
• Located in the horn of Africa• Country with the longest seacoast in Africa -
3,000 km (Red Sea and Indian Ocean)• Total area - 638,000 sq.km • Population - 7.96 million • Mostly semi-arid and desert • Harsh environment, favours nomadic lifestyle• One tribe, one language• One religion (100% Muslim)
Somalia
Somalia
Political situation• No unified government for the last 15 years• 3 distinct geopolitical and autonomous zones
(Northwest, Northeast, South/Central)
• Northwest (Somaliland) declared as a break away republic in 1991
• Northeast (Puntland) 1998• Traditional governance used in some areas• Warlords control some areas of South/Central
Somalia
Geopolitical subdivisions
North West (Somaliland)
North East(Puntland)
South/Central
Somalia …..….is
mainly arid
some areas have
water – especially
the south
Effects of long conflict• The prolonged civil war destroyed health and
social service infrastructure• Most parts have been under a complex
humanitarian emergency• Health sector probably the most affected• Infectious diseases are prevalent• TB - among top 3 public health problems• Services mainly by INGOs and UN agencies
Effects of conflict…..
Vulnerable displaced
population
Effects of conflict….
Many major towns
were left in ruins
Some towns needed to be restored
Current health indicatorsInfant Mortality Rate 130/1000 live births
Under 5 mortality Rate 219 /1000 live births
Maternal mortality Ratio 1,600/100k (2004)
Life expectancy at birth M/F: 43/45 (years)
BCG coverage - 1 year old 35% (2006)
Measles coverage - 1 year old 22% (2006)
TB Incidence 372/100,000
HDI 0.299 (2005)
Purchasing Power Parity $600 (Rank: 193)
Somalia TB Program
• Reactivated in 1995 by WHO and NGOs
• Funding entirely external
• By 2002, there was a good foundation
• Further expansion required more funds
• 2003: a 5-year proposal for TB control was approved by the Global Fund
Global Fund TB Program
• Multi-partnership – 10 INGOs, WHO and local organizations, governments – MOH, a private firm, multilateral agencies
• Somalia Aid Coordinating Body = CCM
• Most activities based in Nairobi
• WVI - Somalia selected Principal Recipient to replace WHO.
Program Goal and ObjectivesGoal
To decrease TB
morbidity and mortality
Main Objectives
1. Increase access to TB services
2. Improve quality of the program with treatment success rate > 85%
TB Patients…
Some patients present at late stages with complications
Main Activities
• Support essential Human Resource
• Improve infrastructure and provision of essential equipment
• Training/Planning
• Procurement and distribution of drugs and lab supplies
Main Activities….
Training
Health workers at end of trainingsession
Main Activities....
• To strengthen TB Information System
• Produce/Distribute Information Education and Communication (IEC) materials
Main Activities….• Monitoring and
Evaluation: Close supervision and
monitoring Microscopy quality
control Quarterly and Mid-Year
Program Reviews Operational research,
external annual audit / evaluationSupervision and monitoring team
with some staff at a TB facility
Awareness raising and Health Education
Health education is conducted before dispensing anti TB drugs to patients
Mobilization and awareness on TB (and HIV/AIDS) in a community
Program Budget
Phase 1: 2years (Oct 2004 – Sep 2006) - US$ 8,224,136
Phase 2: 3 years (Oct 2006 – Sep 2009) - US$ 8,224,136
Implementation arrangements
• Roles of partners clearly defined• WHO – technical advice, training, research• WV - overall program management• Supervision/M&E - WV assisted by an
INGO with national program coordinators• Coordination team chaired by WV• Program data recorded and reported using
standard WHO information system on TB
Program partners’ architecture
Global Fund
Local Funding Agent(PricewaterhouseCoopers)
CCM (HSC)
TBCT(Technical and Management)
TB WG(Coordination Forum)
TB PROGRAMSub recipients
Principal Recipient
(World Vision)
ECHO
Community/Other partners WFP
Ministries of Health
Reports
Food
Reports Funds,Monitoring
Logistics
MonitoringPolitical support
Funds,Monitoring
Reports
Reports
Information
Coordination
Reports
Monitoring
Reports
Oversight
CCM - Country Coordinating MechanismHSC - Health Sector CommitteeTBCT - TB Coordination TeamTB WG - TB Working GroupECHO -EC Humanitarian Office
TB Treatment facilities before Global Fund support (at end 2004)
TB Treatment facilities opened with GF Fund support (at end 2006)
Program Results - Case notification
Case detection increased
49% (2004) to 60% (2006)
Somalia TB Program - Case notification Trend
TB Case notification trend 1995 - 2006
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f p
atie
nts
SS+ve
SS-ve
Expulm
Relapse
Somalia TB Program - Case notification Trend
TB Case notification trend 1995 - 2006
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
pa
tie
nts
Relapse
Expulm
SS-ve
SS+ve
Somalia TB Program - Case notification Trend
Somalia TB ProgramCase detection rate 2000 - 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Ca
se
de
tec
tio
n i
n %
Program Results Treatment Outcome
Treatment success rate ca. 90%
Somalia TB Program Treatment Outcome1995 - 2005
Somalia TB Program Treatment Outcome 1995-2005
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f p
atie
nts Cured
Completed
Died
Failure
Defaulted
Transfer
Somalia TB Program Treatment Outcome1995 - 2005
Somalia TB Program-Treatment Outcome 1995-2005
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f p
atie
nts Cured
Completed
Died
Failure
Defaulted
Transfer
Somalia TB Program Treatment Outcome1995 - 2005
TB Treatment Outcome: 1995 - 2005
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year
Tre
atm
ent
ou
tco
me
(%)
Tr. Success
Death
Failure
Defaulter
Transfer
Linear (Tr. Success)
Linear (Failure)
Other Results…….
• Results in almost all the indicators - above targets
• Tuberculin survey – Incidence decreasing
• Phase 1 GFATM evaluation awarded an “A”
Impact of the Global Fund Program
• Global Fund has enabled continuity of TB service in Somalia
• There are remarkable achievements in a short time
• Program staff supported
Impact of the Global Fund Program
• Coordination for a has brought together the Ministries of the 3 (sometimes) warring authorities
• Cured patients have become advocates and stigma has drastically reduced
• Given Hope to very poor communities. • Set an example to many other programs
in Somalia.
Coordination
Mid term review: Donor (GFATM),Private,Multilateral,Government Authorities, Civil society partnersrepresented
Challenges
• Geopolitical divisions
• Insecurity, limited access to some areas
• Mobile populations
• Limited resources – some gaps
• Weak health delivery system
• TB / HIV
• Multi Drug Resistance
On faith issues…• WVI is well known as a Christian INGO.
• The combination of professionalism and longevity in Somalia was its platform to work on a nationwide TB program.
• Respect for Islam, sensitivity to local practices and definitely no proselytism.
• Key: Transparency, openness and frequent consultations are the key
• Plus: Caring staff in a harsh environment.
Lessons learned… What did not work well
Due to multi-partner nature:• Initial misunderstanding on roles
and responsibilities – detailed TORs needed!
• Local authorities: control issues. • Supervision/Monitoring teams
denied access in some areas.
“These were resolved through constant dialogue and coordination”
Lessons learned ….What worked well
• Partners should be well chosen for complementary strengths.
• Country program decisions on TB taken jointly in a pre-agreed upon process.
• Corrective accountability: solve problems immediately – before they become crises.
• Performance-based concept works in fragile/failed states as in stable countries.
Conclusion…..
“When resources are available, well designed and implemented programs by
professional and caring staff can succeed anywhere - even in FAILED states.”