global design effort americas region efforts and resources mike harrison gde

Global Design Effort

Americas Region Efforts and Resources

Mike HarrisonGDE

Global Design Effort 2ILC MAC April 07

Americas Region Efforts & Resources

ART OrganisationProgram ElementsFY06 actuals FY07 actuals FY08 (presidential budget)Summary


The Global Design Effort Mission

• Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan, and a siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.

• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)

Global R&D program

Reference Design Report (RDR)Engineering Design Report (EDR)

Value estimate


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDE Directorate

GDE Executive Committee (EC)

GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board

GDEChange Control Board

GDEDesign Cost Board

GDE Organization

ILCDesignEffort

ILCR&D

Program


Organization of the ILC-Americas Program

• The work is broken down into a series of technically-based work packages, documented in MoU’s detailing the co-operative arrangement for the execution of work packages at each lab.

• Labs report financial status at the work package level quarterly, and technical status semi-annually.

• The program comprised ~93 work packages for FY06. In FY07, there are ~112 work packages.

• Starting in FY07, planning and prioritization of the work has been coordinated with plans of the GDE Global R&D Board.

• The work packages are organized in a WBS structure.


WBS structure-level 1

• WBS 1: Management (GDE, ART, ILC lab groups)

• WBS 2: Accelerator design

• WBS 3: Accelerator R&D

• WBS 4: Technical Systems design and engineering

• WBS 5: Infrastructure and test facilities

• WBS 6: University accelerator R&D

• WBS 7: Regional Interest

In FY08, WBS 4 and 6 will be integrated into WBS 2 and 3


WBS structure-level 2

• WBS x.2: Global Systems (Commissioning and operations, global controls, installation, instrumentation and feedback, survey and alignment)

• WBS x.3: Electron sources

• WBS x.4: Positron sources

• WBS x.5: Damping rings

• WBS x.6: Ring to Main Linac

• WBS x.7: Main Linac: Optics and beam dynamics

• WBS x.8: Main Linac: RF systems

• WBS x.9: Main Linac: Cavities and Cryomodules

• WBS x.10: Beam delivery system

• WBS x.11: Conventional facilities and siting.

x may be 1,2,3, 5, or 7:


ART WBS level 2 managers

• WBS x.2 Global systems:-J. Carwardine* (ANL), R. Larsen (SLAC)• WBS x.3 Electron sources-A. Brachmann (SLAC)*, M. Poelker (Jlab)• WBS x.4 Positron sources-J. Sheppard (SLAC)*, J. Gronberg(LLNL)• WBS x.5 Damping rings-M. Zisman(LBNL)*, M. Palmer (Cornell)• WBS x.6 Ring to Main Linac and WBS x.7 Main Linacs: Optics,

beam dynamics , P. Tenenbaum (SLAC)*, N. Solyak (FNAL), • WBS x.8 Main Linacs: RF systems-C. Adolphsen (SLAC)*, S.

Nagaitsev (FNAL)• WBS x.9 Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules- S. Mishra

(FNAL)*, H. Padamsee (Cornell)-SRF collaboration leader, J. Mammoser (JLab), M. Kelly (ANL)

• WBS x.10 Beam delivery system-A. Seryi (SLAC)*, B. Parker (BNL)• WBS x.11 Conventional facilities-V. Kuchler (FNAL)*, F. Asiri (SLAC)

* lead


ILC-Americas Regional Team Lab Leaders

ANL-Rod Gerig BNL-Brett Parker

Fermilab-Bob Kephart, Shekar Mishra, Sergei Nagaitsev

Cornell LEPP- Hasan Padamsee, Mark Palmer

LBNL -Mike Zisman

Jefferson Lab -Bob Rimmer, Warren Funk

LLNL -Jeff Gronberg

SLAC -Tor Raubenheimer, Nan Phinney, Tom Himel

TRIUMF -Shane Koscielniak Universities- Project Leaders


FY06 ILC plan and actuals: by machine area

Plan Plan ILCTotal Actual Actual Actual VarianceFY06 FY06 DOE FY06FY06 BudgetFY06 FY06 FY06

MACHINE AREA FTE M&S TotalBudget(LAB)Labor M&S costs+comm(K$) (K$)(K$) (K$)(FTE) (K$) (K$) (K$)

Program direction and administration 9.15 $791.0 $3,241.4 9.12 $1,187.3 $3,313.3 ($71.9)Management 5.93 $100.0 $1,038.5 5.70 $78.8 $1,151.8 ($113.3)Global systems 4.05 $550.0 $1,251.0 3.83 $258.9 $927.7 $323.3Electron sources 3.35 $100.0 $657.5 3.00 $238.0 $731.6 ($74.1)Positron sources 10.32 $202.0 $2,224.6 10.67 $281.9 $2,568.5 ($343.9)Damping rings 9.77 $542.0 $2,333.9 8.43 $542.2 $2,178.0 $155.9Bunch compressor 1.30 $0.0 $213.7 2.00 $0.1 $291.1 ($77.4)Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 6.31 $92.0 $1,146.2 6.50 $30.8 $1,110.8 $35.4Main Linacs: RF systems 16.84 $2,080.0 $5,306.7 21.80 $2,362.6 $6,666.6 ($1,359.9)Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules 15.16 $4,001.0 $7,697.8 14.42 $1,963.4 $7,239.2 $458.6Beam delivery system 14.95 $425.0 $3,174.8 17.10 $399.8 $3,316.7 ($141.9)Conventional facilities 2.69 $550.0 $1,124.6 3.20 $489.4 $1,262.1 ($137.5)Technical Systems 2.20 $990.0 $1,665.4 4.25 $450.8 $1,709.8 ($44.4)University program 0.00 $0.0 $700.0 0.00 $0.0 $700.0 $0.0

TOTAL 102.01 $10,423.0 $31,776.3 110.02 $8,284.1 $33,167.3 ($1,391.0)

Funding sources

DOE FY06 $29,700.0FY05 Carry-over (planned) $1,836.2US-Japan $240.0FY05 Carry-over (additional) $1,969.5Total $33,745.7Carry-over to FY07 $578.4


FY06 ILC plan and actuals: by lab

ILC Actual Actual Actual VariancePlan Plan DOE FY06Plan BudgetFY06 FY06 FY06

FTE M&S TotalBudget(LAB)Labor M&S Costs+commLab/Univ (K$) (K$)(K$) (K$)(FTE) (K$) (K$) (K$)

SLAC 56.17 $3,660.0 $14,057.0 65.70 $3,921.0 $16,026.4 ($1,969.5)FNAL 31.58 $6,301.0 $12,490.3 30.20 $3,443.2 $12,051.4 $438.9ANL 3.40 $27.0 $300.0 1.07 $10.5 $232.7 $67.3Jlab 1.00 $436.0 $822.0 2.02 $188.1 $634.8 $187.2LLNL 2.25 $180.0 $1,191.0 2.73 $174.2 $1,059.9 $131.1LBNL 3.11 $44.0 $810.2 3.40 $54.8 $819.4 ($9.3)BNL 3.50 $25.0 $600.0 3.60 $23.9 $599.8 $0.2UNIV 0.00 $0.0 $700.0 0.00 $0.0 $700.0 $0.0GDE 0.00 $0.0 $613.0 0.60 $400.8 $855.9 ($242.9)ART 1.00 $50.0 $192.8 0.70 $67.6 $186.9 $5.9sum 102.01 $10,723.0 $31,776.3 110.02 $8,284.1 $33,167.3 ($1,391.0)

In addition to the above, outside the ILC line, in FY06 FNAL provided a total of $17.4M ($5.4M M&S, $8.1M SWF) in support of SRF infrastructure and generic SRF R&D.


FY06 ILC Cost+Commit

Positron sources8%

Damping rings7%

Bunch compressor1%

Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation

3%

Main Linacs: RF systems

20%

Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules

22%

Beam delivery system10%

Conventional facilities

4%

Technical Systems5%

University program2%

Program direction and

administration

Global systems3%

Management3%

Electron sources2%

FY06 actual cost+commitments:Breakdown by Machine Area

~40% R&D~20% infra+test facilities ~22% design ~5% engineering~13% management


• The FY07 ILC program in the US was aligned with the GDE priorities, and structured to conform to the GDE R&D S0, S1, S2 and RDR plans, to the extent possible on the required time scale.

• For technical R&D proposed in support of the US regional interest, input also came from the Ozaki panel, a body formed by the LCSGA to advise DOE on activities on regional interest efforts.

• A plan was developed for a $60M ILC budget. This plan was never used, as the appropriated FY07 ILC budget line was $42M (legislation enacted in Feb 2007).

• In Feb. 2007, the information on GDE priorities and regional interest was used to develop a $42M program.

FY07 planning


FY06 ACTUALS VS FY07 PLAN-BY MACHINE AREA

ActualMACHINE FY06 FTE FY06 M&S FY06 Total FY07 plan FY07 plan FY07 plan %AREA Actual Actual Cost+Comm. FTE M&S Total CHANGEProgram direction and administration9.12 $1,187 $3,313 9.85 $892 $3,966 20%Management 5.70 $79 $1,152 6.00 $25 $1,424 24%Global systems 3.83 $259 $928 8.21 $744 $2,809 203%Electron sources 3.00 $238 $732 2.65 $225 $699 -4%Positron sources 10.67 $282 $2,569 6.65 $73 $1,769 -31%Damping rings 8.43 $542 $2,178 8.50 $564 $2,402 10%Ring to Main Linac 2.00 $0 $291 1.20 $0 $199 -32%Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation6.50 $31 $1,111 7.80 $77 $1,658 49%Main Linacs: RF systems 21.80 $2,363 $6,667 20.95 $2,447 $6,482 -3%Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules14.42 $1,963 $7,239 28.80 $5,361 $12,661 75%Beam delivery system 17.10 $400 $3,317 14.35 $224 $2,433 -27%Conventional facilities 3.20 $489 $1,262 3.15 $410 $1,158 -8%TDR Engineering Support 4.25 $451 $1,710 10.40 $510 $3,207 88%Univ. prog 0.00 $0 $700 0.00 $0 $500 -29%Regional Interest 0.00 0.00 $550 $635

TOTAL 110.02 $8,284 $33,167 128.50 $12,102 $42,002 27%


FY06 ACTUALS VS FY07 PLAN-BY LAB

ActualLab/Univ Actual Actual FY06 Total Plan Plan Plan

FY06 FTE FY06 M&S Cost+Comm.FY07 FTE FY07 M&S FY07 TotalSLAC 65.70 $3,921 $16,026 64.50 $4,470 $17,036FNAL 30.20 $3,443 $12,051 46.30 $6,639 $17,855ANL 1.07 $11 $233 6.13 $351 $1,833Jlab 2.02 $188 $635 0.83 $190 $390LANL 0.00 $0 $0 0.67 $179 $371LLNL 2.73 $174 $1,060 2.12 $157 $950LBNL 3.40 $55 $819 2.45 $35 $795BNL 3.60 $24 $600 4.50 $24 $970UNIV 0.00 $0 $700 0.00 $0 $500GDE 0.60 $401 $856 0.00 $0 $725ART 0.70 $68 $186 1.00 $57 $577

TOTAL 110.02 $8,284 $33,166 128.50 $12,102 $42,002

In addition to the above, outside the ILC line, in FY07 FNAL is providing a total of $26.1M ($8.0M M&S, $9.6M SWF) in support of SRF infrastructure and generic SRF R&D


ILC FY07 Plan

Global systems7%

Positron sources4%


15%

Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation

4%

Ring to Main Linac0%

Damping rings6%

Electron sources

Management3%

Program direction and

administration

University program1%

Regional Interest2%

Reserve

TDR Engineering Support

8%

Beam delivery system


3%

Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules

30%

FY07 plans: Breakdown by Machine Area

~40% R&D,~18% infra+test facilities, ~22% design, ~8% engineering,~12% management


• The President’s budget for FY08 has a funding level of $60M for

the ILC line.

• Explicit support for the Detector R&D ($7M) included in this total.

• Starting in Feb. 2007, the WBS managers were asked to plan to

this level for FY08. Final allocations determined after the FY07

budget became known.

• In addition to the above there is also generic SRF infrastructure

and R&D projected at $23M. This funding is predominantly at

Fermilab and has been aligned with the ART program at the

request of the DOE. It contains support for a cryomodule string

test facility, a new EP processing facility, single cell processing

R&D, cavity performance analysis, materials research, test facility

controls, and industrial development.

Funding guidance for FY08


FY08 ILC plan, by general category

BY GENERAL CATEGORY FY08 FY08 FY08FTE M&S Total

WBS 1: Management 16.28 $1,120 $5,242WBS 2: ILC Accelerator Design and Engineering 56.19 $1,233 $12,763WBS 3: ILC R&D 70.42 $11,726 $27,891WBS 5: ILC Infrastructure and test facilities 5.11 $986 $2,153WBS 7: Regional Interest R&D and Infrastructre 1.00 $2,355 $2,895Detectors $7,000Reserve $2,056TOTAL 148.99 $17,420 $60,000


FY08 ILC plan, by machine area

FY08 FY08 FY08BY WBS AREA FTE M&S Total

Lab, GDE and WBS Management (1) 16.28 $1,120 $5,242 Global Systems (x.2) 18.20 $1,540 $5,502Electron Source (x.3) 3.38 $645 $1,406Positron Source (x.4) 7.03 $335 $2,317Damping Rings (x.5) 9.66 $775 $3,124RTML (x.6) 2.45 $0 $473ML: Optics and Beam dynamics (x.7) 13.45 $265 $2,780ML: RF systems (x.8) 23.20 $4,137 $9,215ML: Cavities and Cryomodules (x.9) 34.00 $4,893 $12,254BDS (x.10) 16.85 $900 $4,545CFS (x.11) 4.50 $2,810 $4,088Detectors $7,000Reserve $2,056Total 148.99 $17,420 $60,000


FY08 ILC plan, by Institution

BY INSTITUTION FY08 FY08 FY08FTE M&S Total

Fermilab 59.50 $8,291 $20,277SLAC 65.21 $6,884 $20,515Argonne 7.61 $590 $2,776Berkeley 4.29 $383 $1,699Brookhaven 4.15 $628 $1,801Jefferson Lab 1.60 $265 $853Livermore 2.61 $219 $1,288Cornell (SRF only if NSF=FALSE) 0.45 $160 $301GDE 1.33 $0 $787ART 2.25 $0 $646Detectors $7,000Reserve $2,056

TOTAL 148.99 $17,420 $60,000


$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

Program direction,administration, andmanagementGlobal systems

Electron sources

Positron sources

Damping rings

Ring to Main Linac

Main Linacs: Optics, beamdynamics, instrumentation


Main Linacs: Cavities andCryomodules

Beam delivery system


ILC program element evolution, FY06-09 (ILC line only)


Summary

• ART funding support has increased each year since the

ILC program inception ($33M -> $42M -> $53M, FY06 ->

FY08).

• Alignment with the GDE global programs is receiving

due attention from both the GDE and ART

• Significant effort in SRF infrastructure continues

• We will continue to modify the ART plans to reflect the

GDE R&D program

global design effort americas region efforts and resources mike harrison gde

Documents