Global Classroom

An initiative under

Substitute Blended

Learning

By

Dr Muhammad Azrin Ahmad

Head of Programme (Learning Technologies)

Centre of Instructional Resources & e-Learning (CIReL)

1

Education 1.0Educators as content aspects

Focus on being taught

Education 2.0Educators as orchestratorsFocus on asking

Education 3.0Educators as mentorsFocus on sharing

Education Revolution IR 4.0 to Education 4.0

Education 4.0Educators as connectors,

creators, constructivists

2

3

UMP Online LearningLearner-Technology-Pedagogy Integration

UMP MOOCAutomotive, Industrial biotechnology, chemical, manufacturing, fine & specialty chemicals

UMP Micro Credentialcompetency-based digital form of certification

Global ClassroomInternational expert sharing through virtual classroom

Open CoursewareOpen access course free to learn offer by UMP

Self Pace LearningFlexible learning according to individual learning path

KALAM : Substitute Blended Learning

Content curation, supported with technology

4

5

KALAM – UMP e-Learning Ecosystem

Assessment activities conducted via KALAM platform – online quizzes, assignment submission etc.

Course information

online learning – forum, chatting, Web 2.0 app (Padlet, Blendspace etc)

Learning activities

Students may accessed or download the learning material for each particular topic before, during the class or after….. Presentation slide, past year question, exercise ……etc.

Learning Material

Assessment activities conducted via KALAM platform – online quizzes, assignment submission etc.

Online assessment

4main

elearningfeatures

6

Global Classroom is a contemporary teaching paradigm which is beyond classroom boundary (regardless of geographical, time zone,

languages and cultural barriers)

as students collaborate virtually while being mentored by international partner not limited to learning Institution or industry through technology integrated Collaborative

Online International Learning

What is Global Classroom?

7

OPERATION

Kansai

University

Universiti

Malaysia Pahang

Topic A &

Student A

Topic B &

Student B

Assignme

nt A

Assignme

nt B

Student

Kansai

University

conduct

Assignment

A

Student

UMP

conduct

Assignment

BPA

RTN

ERSH

AR

ED

MO

DU

LE

PR

OJE

CT

TOP

IC

LEA

RN

ING

AC

TIV

ITIE

S

Lecturer UMP

evaluate

student A

performance,

10-20%

Lecturer

Kansai

evaluate

student B

performanc

e, xx%

ASS

ESSM

E

NT

Separat

e or

joined

evaluat

ion

Lecture

rs

facilitat

e

CIReL

coordin

ate

Glo

bal

Cla

ssro

om

AC

TIV

ITIE

S

Global Classroom Framework –ADDIE Model

AANALYZE THE SCOPE OF LEARNING &LEARNING OUTCOME

DDESIGN THE GLOBAL CLASSROOM BY MAPPING THE COURSE

DDEVELOPING PARTNERSHIP

IIMPELEMENT DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT THROUGH VIRTUAL FACE TO FACE

EEVALUATE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT & PERFORMANCE VIA ASSESSMENT FROM PARTNER

8

9

10

DR. TAN SUAT HIANPLANT AND MAMMALIAN CELL

TECHNOLOGYDR LISTYA UTAMI KARMAWAN

ATMA JAYA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA

28

MISS LEE CHIN MEI INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY DR YSOBEL RUTH BAKER UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, UNITED KINGDOM 47

DR HONG PUI KHOONNUTRACEUTICALS AND FUNCTIONAL

FOODSDR EMMA HERNANDEZ-SANABRIA GHENT UNIVERSITY, BELGIUM. 20

DR FASIHIORGANIC CHEMISTRY IN DRUG DISCOVERY:

SYNTHESIS OF CHALCONE BICA CLAISEN-SCHMIDT CONDENSATION REACTION

DR HILWAN YUDA TERUNA UNIVERSITAS RIAU PEKANBARU INDONESIA 28

TS. DR. SAIFFUL KAMALUDDIN BIN MUZAKIR @ LOKMAN

SOLAR CELL TECHNOLOGY DR RIZA MUHIDAUNIVERSITAS BANDAR LAMPUNG, INDONESIA

27

DR A.K.M KAFI BIOSENSOR TECHNOLOGY DR MJA SHIDDIKY GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY, AUSTRALIA

DR AINI NORHIDAYAH MOHAMED MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY DR NENI FRIMAYANTISEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU FARMASI RIAU, PEKANABRU INDONESIA

DR RODZIAH COLLOID AND SURFACE SCIENCE DR GHAZALEH BAHMANROKHUNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA

29

DR ZAMANI INSTRUMENTATION METHODHENNY SRI WAHYUNINGSIH, S.FARM, M.SI, APT

UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA 16

1. DR. YUHANI BINTI YUSOF2. DR. MOHD SHAM MOHAMAD

DISCRETE STRUCTURE & APPLICATIONS DR FAISAL BINUS UUNIVERSITY 124

MISS LEE CHIN MEI INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY DR ALEX QUINTERO UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE 47

1. SITI ROSLINDAR YAZIZ2. AP DR. ROSLINAZAIRIMAH ZAKARIA3. DR. NORYANTI MUHAMMAD4. DR. KU MUHAMMAD NA’IM KU KHALIF5. DR. MOHD KHAIRUL BAZLI MOHD AZIZ6. NUR ZAHIRAH MD NOOR7. DR. WAN NUR SYAHIDAH WAN YUSOFF8. DR. NORATIKAH ABU

APPLIED STATISTICS PROF DR JOHN BOLAND UNIVESITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 128

TOTAL 494

ACHIEVEMENT GLOBAL CLASSSROOM

FIST 2019

11

DR YUHANI BT YUSOFDISCRETE STRUCTURE

& APPLICATIONSBINUS UNIVERSITY, INDONESIA MRS VISKA NOVIANTRIDR MOHD SHAM MOHAMAD

PN INTAN SABARIAH SABRI

CIK LEE CHIN MEI MICROBIOLOGY SHIZUOKA UNIVERSITYASSISTANT PROF DR YOSUKE

TASHIRO

CIK LEE CHIN MEI GENETICS UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DR YSOBEL RUTH BAKER

PM DR. AGUS GETER EDY SUTJIPTO SEMI CONDUCTOR UNIVERSITAS BANDAR LAMPUNG DR RIJAMUHIDA

DR. NINA SUHAITY BINTI AZMI INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGYFACULTY OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, FORMAN CHRISTIAN

COLLEGE, PAKISTAN

PM DR ANVARJON AHMEDOV

APPLIED CALCULUSSULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY.

KAZAKHSTANDR ABDULLAH ALMASI

DR NOR IZZATI BT JAINI

DR MUHAMMAD AZRIN BIN AHMAD

PUAN SITI FATIMAH HJ AHMAD ZABIDI

ACHIEVEMENT GLOBAL CLASSSROOM

FIST 2018

12

13

66 Universities from 20 countrieshad collaborated with UMP for

Global Classroom

United States

Turkey

NewZealand

Taiwan

Saudi Arabia

Pakistan

IranIndonesia

Japan

India

Kazakhstan

Maldives

Nigeria

Oman

China

UkraineUnited kingdom

ACHIEVEMENT GLOBAL CLASSROOM

UNTIL SEPTEMBER 2019

14

COLLABORATION’S UNIVERSITY

15

16

Information

Content/ Resources

Activities Assessment

5%

40%

35%20%

Learning objectives/ synopsis/

syllabus/study planner/scheme of work (SOW)/

Performa/Guide/Descriptions

1 ITEM

Files Folders, Topics, Chapters, Unit, Modules in

doc, ppt, swf, SCORM, pdf,

video, audio, link to social media

and web 2.0

7 ITEMS

SynchronousWebinar/VC

/Chat

3 ITEMS

AsynchronousPortfolio, task, wiki,

discussion, forum/email &

messenger, feedback, mind mapping, link to social media &

web 2.0

Quiz, Assignment, journal, portfolio, case study, mind,

projects

2 ITEMS

Blended Learning Implementation at Public Universities (Supporting)

17

Information

Content/ Resources

Activities Assessment

5%

40%

35%20%

0.5 jam aktiviti

pensyarah(1 item x 0.5 jam = 0.5 jam)

6 jam aktiviti

pensyarah(6 item x 1 jam = 6 jam

6 jam aktiviti

pensyarah(4 item x 1.5 jam = 6 jam)

0.5 jam aktiviti

pensyarah(1 item = 0.5 jam

13 jam/42 jam untuk 3 credit

hour bahandisampaikan

secara blended

Blended Learning Implementation at Public Universities (Substitute)

18

DefinisiPTG

19

Definisi PTG

PTG ialah untuk mengupayakanpembelajaran dalam talian secaraberstruktur dalam julat 30-60%daripada Jam Pembelajaran Pelajar(Student Learning Time, SLT)

berdasarkan formula 40:40:20.

20

Ketiga-tiga elemen ini mempunyai hubunganterus dengan hasil pembelajaran kursus yang

berkaitan.

Definisi PTGFormula 40:40:20 adalah agihan kepada 30%

hingga 60% daripada keseluruhan Jam Pembelajaran Pelajar (SLT) kepada tiga(3)

elemen PTG.

Bahan PdP Aktiviti PdP Pentaksiran

21

Definisi PTG

Formula PTS5:40:35:20

Formula PTG40:40:20

kerana didapati 5% yang diperuntukan untuk

‘Maklumat’ adalah kurang relevan bagi PdPberasaskan keperluan hasil pembelajaran.

**Formula ini dihasil melalui dua bengkel yang dihadiri oleh peneraju danpengamal pembelajaran teradun universiti awam iaitu pada 14-15 Ogos2018 (lokasi di Kinrara Resort) dan 4 Oktober 2018 (lokasi di UniversitiPertahanan Nasiona Malaysia). 22

Petunjuk MinimaPembelajaran Teradun Gantian (PTG)

Wajaran yang dinyatakan (40%, 40%,20%) bagi tiga (3) elemen PTG bolehdiubahsuai dengan peratusan yang bersesuaian bagi keperluan IPT masing-masing dan ianya perlu disertakan dengan justifikasi yang jelas dan boleh diukur.

Bahan PdP 40% Aktiviti PdP 40% Pentaksiran 20%

Penggunaan bahan

penyampaian pengajaran

• Rakaman video & audio &

skrin

• Persembahan berbentuk

penceritaan

• Animasi dan Perisian Web 2.0

• Simulasi atau Realiti Maya,

atau Realiti Luasan, atau

Realiti Tergabung

• Syarahan dalam/luar kelas

• Kandungan interaktif

• Video praktikal/makmal

• Dan lain-lain yang

bersesuaian

Pelaksanaan aktiviti

secara dalam talian

menggunakan web

2.0 tool

• Kahoot

• Padlet

• LMS (cth: forum,

chatting, dsb).

Pentaksiran secara

dalam talian

Kuiz

Penilaian

Tugasan

refleksi

23

Justifikasi Pemurnian Pembelajaran Teradun

Bagi menyokongpelaksanaan DePAN

(2011)

Pembelajaransecara fleksibel

kehendak RevolusiPerindustrian 4.0

Kepuasan pelajar terhadappengalaman pembelajaran Pembelajaran teradun pula perlu distruktur

khususnya bagi kaedah dalam talian supayapembelajaran berlangsung dengan berkesan

kandungan kursus daninteraksi dalam

pembelajaran khususnyasecara dalam talian

24

1

2

3

4

5

6

Minggu Penyampaian

Fleksibiliti untuk sebarangperubahan pengajaran

berkonsep “Anytime, Anywhere, Anyway, Anyhow”

PTG dalam talian Segerak

Aktiviti, pentaksiran dalam talian didokumentasikansecara sempurna

Pelaksanaan PTGTertakluk sepenuhnya kepada rancangan pengajaran yang telah

ditetapkan perlaksanaan PTG

PTG dalam talian Tidak Segerak

Rekod kehadiran pelajar digantikan dengan rekodpenglibatan dan pencapaian

Pembelajaran kendiri & Pengajaran disampaikan

secara interaktif

Rekod kehadiran digantikandengan penglibatan dan

pencapaian pelajar

Kuliah fizikal face-to-face

25

SegerakTidak

Segerak

Bahan PdP (bagi 1 jam

kuliah pembelajaran)

Aktiviti PdP

Pentaksiran/

Penilaian

penggunaan

alatan web 2.0,

forum,

perbincangan,

kaji selidik,

maklum balas

Kuiz dalam talian, penilaian dalam

talian, tugasan dalam talian.

Pembelajaran

maya berdurasi

1 jam

Aktiviti

secara

dalam

talian

untuk

satuminggu

Aktiviti

segerak

boleh

melibatkan

alatan

interaksi

masa-nyata

Pentaksiran

berterusan

dalam

tempoh

1 minggu.

Menggunakan

aplikasi web 2.0

teaching tools atau

aplikasi lain yang bersesuaian

Perbincangan, forum

Pembentangan

Perbahasan

Konsultansi

Telesidang, webinar

audio masa-nyata

rakaman video

animasi

multimedia

26

Simulasi bagi Kursus 3 jam kredit dengan PTG (30%)

SLT bagi kursus 3 jam kredit ialah 120 jam

PdP Konvensional : 70% x 120 jam

= 84 jamPdP PTG : 30% x 120 jam =

36 jam

27

Jadual 1: Wajaran bagi Tiga (3) Elemen PTG (Pembelajaran Dalam Talian) bersama Contoh Perancangan Perlaksanaan 30% = 36 Jam

Bahan PdP

40%

Aktiviti PdP

40%

Pentaksiran

20%

14 jam

14 jam

7 jam

Jumlah 36 jam

Minggu 3, 4, 5 berdurasi 10 minit x 6 = 6 jam

Minggu 8, 9

Interaktif 30-40 minit x 9 = 5 jam

Kelas dalam Talian 1 jam x 2 = 3 jam

Minggu 3, 5

Minggu 4

Aktiviti PdP Individu 2 Soalan x 2 jam = 4 jam

Perbincangan dalam Talian = 2 jam

Minggu 8, 9 Aktiviti berkumpulan = 8 jam

Minggu 5, 6Tugasan (15%) dengan SLT 8 jam

Jumlah Pembelajaran dalam talian 36 jam

(4/14) @ (36/120 = 30%)

28

Bahan PdP

30-50%

Aktiviti PdP

30-50%

Pentaksiran

10-30%

11-18

Jam

Mesti > 36 jam

Minggu 3, 4, 5 berdurasi 10 minit x 6 = 6 jam

Minggu 8, 9

Interaktif 30-40 minit x 9 = 5 jam

Kelas dalam Talian 1 jam x 2 = 3 jam

Minggu 3, 5

Minggu 4

Aktiviti PdP Individu 2 Soalan x 2 jam = 4 jam

Perbincangan dalam Talian = 2 jam

Minggu 8, 9 Aktiviti berkumpulan = 8 jam

Minggu 5, 6 Tugasan (15%) dengan SLT 8 jam

Jumlah Pembelajaran dalam talian 36 jam

(4/14) @ (36/120 = 30%)

Jadual 2: Contoh Wajaran bagi Tiga (3) Elemen PTG (Pembelajaran Dalam Talian) dan Wajaran (dalam Julat) bersama Contoh Perancangan Perlaksanaan

11-18

Jam

4-11

Jam

29

Bahan PdP

Aktiviti PdP

Pentaksiran

12

Jam

Mesti > 36 jam

Minggu 1 – 4berdurasi 15 minit x 4 = 4 jam

atau kelas biasa 1 jam x 4 = 4 jam

Minggu 1 – 4

Interaktif @ SCL 30 minit x 4 =

4 jam

Kelas atas Talian 1 jam x 4 = 4 jam

Minggu 1 – 4

Perbincangan atas Talian bersamapelajar luar 1 jam x 4 = 4 jam

Aktiviti berkumpulan 2 jam x 4 = 8 jam

Minggu 3, 4Tugasan (min 10%) dengan SLT 12 jam

Jumlah Pembelajaran dalam talian 36 jam

(4/14) @ (36/120 = 30%)

Jadual 3: Contoh Wajaran bagi Tiga (3) Elemen PTG (Pembelajaran Dalam Talian) dan Wajaran sama rata bersama Contoh Perancangan Perlaksanaan

12

Jam

12

Jam

30

Thank You

31