global ccs institute update - cslf · pdf fileglobal ccs institute update bill ... ccs status...
TRANSCRIPT
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE UPDATEBill Koppe - Senior Vice President CSLF Technical Group MeetingCSLF Technical Group MeetingPau, France 15th March 2010
WWW.GLOBALCCSINSTITUTE.COM
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
TODAY’S PRESENTATION
• THE G8 AGENDA FOR CCS DEVELOPMENT
• THE GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE ROLE
• DEVELOPING ACTIVITIES AND ORGANISATION
• CCS PROJECT SUPPORT PROGRAM
1
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
ORIGINS OF THE GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE THE G8 CALGARY IEA/CSLF RECOMMENDATIONSTHE G8 CALGARY IEA/CSLF RECOMMENDATIONS
JULY 2008: G8 LEADERS ENDORSED THE FOLLOWING IEA/CSLF RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOPED WITH INDUSTRY AND RESEARCH STAKEHOLDERS:DEVELOPED WITH INDUSTRY AND RESEARCH STAKEHOLDERS:
1. Demonstrating CO2 Capture and Storage• Commitment by 2010 to +20 >1 Mt CCS projects and wide deployment by 2020Commitment by 2010 to +20 >1 Mt CCS projects and wide deployment by 2020
2. Taking concerted international action• Financial support by governments specifically mentioned
3. Addressing the commercial gap • Market mechanism alone are insufficient for initial non-petroleum projects
4 E t bli hi l l d l t f k4. Establishing legal and regulatory frameworks• Critical to enabling non-petroleum CCS projects
5. Raising public education and awareness
2
• Governments and stakeholders must dedicate resources
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
ORIGINS OF THE GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE THE G8 CALGARY IEA/CSLF RECOMMENDATIONSTHE G8 CALGARY IEA/CSLF RECOMMENDATIONS
JULY 2008: G8 LEADERS ENDORSED THE FOLLOWING IEA/CSLF RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOPED WITH INDUSTRY AND RESEARCH STAKEHOLDERS:DEVELOPED WITH INDUSTRY AND RESEARCH STAKEHOLDERS:
1. Demonstrating CO2 Capture and Storage• Commitment by 2010 to +20 >1 Mt CCS projects and wide deployment by 2020Commitment by 2010 to +20 >1 Mt CCS projects and wide deployment by 2020
2. Taking concerted international action• Financial support by governments specifically mentioned
3. Addressing the commercial gap • Market mechanism alone are insufficient for initial non-petroleum projects
4 E t bli hi l l d l t f k4. Establishing legal and regulatory frameworks• Critical to enabling non-petroleum CCS projects
5. Raising public education and awareness
3
• Governments and stakeholders must dedicate resources
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
HIGH LEVEL SUPPORTOFFICIAL LAUNCH OF GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE – L’AQUILA G8 JULY 2009
4
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
CCS FORWARD HORIZONS
CCS ACTION
III – COMMERCIAL DEPLOYMENT
II - LARGE SCALE DEMONSTRATION Key initial focus
for the Global CCS Institute
I - FOUNDATION
CCS Institute
I FOUNDATION
5
20252010 2015 2020
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
CCS IS ABOUT INDUSTRIAL CO2 SOURCESTHE ONLY REAL MITIGATION OPTION FOR SOME INDUSTRIES
Gas Processing to Remove Reservoir COGas Processing to Remove Reservoir CO2Minimal capture cost and possible EOR revenueAccess to petroleum storage data and tenure
Gasification for Chemicals or Liquids Minimal capture cost - higher capital cost than gas processingLarge existing CO2 sources in China and South Africa
Coal and Gas Power Projects High capture cost and capital cost Lead time for new storage tenements and exploration
Steel and Cement PlantsHigh capture cost and capital cost Lead time for new storage tenements and exploration
6
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
CCS PROJECTS – WHEN AND HOW MUCH? ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECT LEAD-TIME AND COST CHARACTERISTICS
Access to known storage – oil and gas associated
Power – Existing Storage
ccess to o sto age o a d gas assoc ated
Steel Ne Storage
Power - New Storage
Gap
-$/
t
New Coal to Liquids
Existing Coal to Liquids ost
Steel - New Storage
mm
erci
al G
New LNG – All CO2
Existing Coal to Liquids
aptu
re c
o
Com
Existing Gas Processing + EOR
Existing Gas Processing New LNG – Reservoir CO2
ditio
nal c
a
7Lead Time - Years
Existing Gas Processing + EOR
Add
0 5 10 15
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
EVOLVING GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE ACTIVITYORGANISATION DEVELOPING TO SUPPORT ACTIVITYORGANISATION DEVELOPING TO SUPPORT ACTIVITY
2009 20102009 2010
E t bli h t Australia Europe North America AsiaEstablishment
Alliances
Australia Europe, North America, Asia
IEA, CSLF, World Bank, ADB, Clinton Foundation, Climate Group
Strategic Analysis
Ideal Portfolio
Worley Parsons
L.E.K.
Direct Project Support
Project Enabling Strategiesj g gCommunity Engagement, Commercial Gap, Regulatory Regime
May Members Meeting
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
EVOLVING GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE ACTIVITYORGANISATION DEVELOPING TO SUPPORT ACTIVITYORGANISATION DEVELOPING TO SUPPORT ACTIVITY
2009 20102009 2010
E t bli h t Australia Europe North America AsiaEstablishment
Alliances
Australia Europe, North America, Asia
IEA, CSLF, World Bank, ADB, Clinton Foundation, Climate Group
Strategic Analysis
Ideal Portfolio
Worley Parsons
L.E.K.
Direct Project Support
Project Enabling Strategiesj g gCommunity Engagement, Commercial Gap, Regulatory Regime
May Members Meeting
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
PROJECT SUPPORT SELECTION PROCESS
Main mechanism by application – first round proposals in January 2010
Secondary mechanism in association with Global CCS Status update
Over 50 proposals in first application round totalling over $500 millionOver 50 proposals in first application round totalling over $500 million
Participation by the majority of Global CCS Institute industry Members
Application proposals being evaluated with Parsons Brinkerhof consortium
Global CCS Status update underway with Worley Parsons consortiumGlobal CCS Status update underway with Worley Parsons consortium
First round shortlist announcements by early May 2010
Focus on key challenges and collaboration between projects
10
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
ALIGNMENT WITH PARALLEL PROCESSES
Source: L.E.K.
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
CCS PROJECT STRATEGY: ROLLING APPLICATION PROCESS
ProjectMember Consortia Outside ConsortiaProject Submissions
Member Consortia Outside Consortia
Global CCS Institute
Assessment
Technical Advisers P.B. Consortium
Technical Advisory CommitteeCommittee
Board
12
Board Approval
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
COMMITMENT TO COLLABORATION
• A core element of the Global CCS Institute mission
• Demonstrated through the early development of alliances
• A requirement for effective global project support programs
• A requirement for effective knowledge sharingA requirement for effective knowledge sharing
• A general need to avoid duplication of effort
• Now fostering collaboration between projects and companies
• Project networks aligned with existing R&D networks13
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE
14
www.globalccsinstitute.com