gl10 – december 8-9, 20081 grey literature in french digital repositories: a survey j. schöpfel...
TRANSCRIPT
1GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Grey literature in French digital repositories: a survey
J. Schöpfel (University of Lille 3)
C. Stock (INIST-CNRS)
2GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
France, an advanced country in the heart of OA Europe
Source : DRIVER study 2007
3GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Purpose of survey
Integration of grey literature in French OA:
1. The typology of grey documents
2. The relative part of grey literature
3. The assignment of specific metadata
4. Quality control and policies
5. Access to full text
4GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Sample: 56 repositories
56
42 4137
25
1713 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
March-May 2008
Located in France
Living archive
5GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Year of creation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge
6GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Repository type and institution
InstSubj
Doc
Other
Other
Research
HE
18
6
03
11
7
44
1
0
0
20
5
10
15
20
7GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Size of repositories and total number of items
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
Total number of items (cumulated)
Number of items in archives (ranking)
8GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Scientific domains
No big archive for life or medical sciences
9GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Repository type and presence of grey literature
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Doc-type Institutional Other Subject-based
no
yes
= 79% of all repositories contain GL
(and 100% of institutional archives)
10GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Content types in French repositories (OpenDOAR)
11GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Document types
ETD
Reports
Conferences
Commercial publications
Multimedia
Datasets
Other
CoursewareWorking papers
Grey documents = 16% of all items
12GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
GL document types
Working papersCourseware
ETDReports
Conferences
Other or not specified GL
13GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Size of repository and number of grey items
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Size of repository
Num
ber o
f gre
y ite
ms
HAL
IRD
INRA
PERSEE
INRIA
TEL
HAL SHS
14GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
100% GL repositories and document types
15GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Specific metadata
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
no specific GL metadata specific GL metadata
66% of all archives
16GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
OA policy (n=38 archives)
Source: OpenDOAR
55% without policy statement
17GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Quality control
quality control41%
no quality control or n.d.
59%
18GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Access to full text
48%
16%
5%
18%
13%
All items Mixed Moving wall Restricted NA
19GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
On usage statistics
•The big silence.•Confirms the DRIVER study 2007: •70% of the repositories do log the statistical data on access but analysis and interpretation « in development » or « problematic ».•No public access to statistics but in some cases, information to authors (CCSD).
20GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
One exception: IFREMER
21GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
IFREMER average downloads: grey vs. white
54
22
148
0
10
20
30
40
50
60A
vera
ge d
ownl
oads
per
item
ETD Reports Conferences Articles etc.
22GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Conclusion
• A landscape in movement
• Grey takes its place
• Wanted: policy statement
• More wanted: improved bibliographic control
• Mostly wanted: usage statistics
23GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
References
Van de Graaf M. & Van Eijndhoven K. The European Repository Landscape: Inventory Study into the Present Type and Level of OAI-Compliant Digital Repository Activities in the EU. Amsterdam, AUP 2007.
http://dare.uva.nl/document/93725
André F. et al. Institutional repositories. The repository jigsaw. Research Information, 2007, April/May, p. 27.
Merceur F. Fonctionnement et usages d’une archive institutionnelle. IFREMER, October 2008.
http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/2008/rapport-4632.pdf
24GL10 – December 8-9, 2008
Thank you!
Joachim Schöpfel Charles de Gaulle University of Lille 3
[email protected]++ (0) 33 320 41 61 53 or ++ (0) 33 688 35 01 47
Christiane StockINIST-CNRS
[email protected] ++33 (0) 383 50 46 00