gk chesterton - simplicity and tolstoy

7/31/2019 GK Chesterton - Simplicity and Tolstoy

1/97Publ

icDomainintheUnitedStates,Google-digitized

/http://www.hathitrust.org/access_us

e#pd-us-google


2/97PublicDomainintheUnitedStates,Google-digitized


e#pd-us-google


3/97

. I_- -. _W ; 7 1- _

TO

PublicDomainintheUnitedStates,Google-digitized


e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


6/97

O . .

msScnooz. .

.



e#pd-us-google


7/97

TO

_ . . - - " " T :. 1-



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


9/97

TO

sthenecessary

and specula-

continuous

ortheuni-

t; w ehaveto

abituallybefore

wehaveseen

hat weseeit

. Themoreconsistently

hemorethey

ndthereforeto

simpli cation

ational.Thus

ensationalof

ong at a

ob ects,and,

hrill,they

and staring

hat allthe

imeareupon



e#pd-us-google


10/97

TO

cation. ach

ndamentalthan

intheliteralsense,

art, fo re -

ofman,classic

ehas rst been

oassertsthat

history,isa

iranda freckled

essionist,

sertsthat tohis

scertain,man

airandagrey

bolist,andsays

neiscertain,

enhairanda

at writersof

formoranother

communication

issometimes

slye pressed,



e#pd-us-google


11/97

TO

hink that

s indrinking

t it consistsin

ethanisgood

t theretln nto

ngswordsinto

k it isachieved

toveryin-

ficebayonets.

he ingo, fora

ithgunpowder

atural,

rianrevol-

with dynamite

nism.It would

asentiment,

heclaimof

beobeyingthe

gwhen we

hugevolumes

t topersuadethem-

. 1



e#pd-us-google


12/97

TO

e truthoftheir

ntsofour time

at they

t roadsthis

simplicity.

theangular

nckbytheeternal

hitmanreturnsto

hhe canaccept,

chhecan re ect.

returnto

merespects,

ofakitten

ail isasimple

hythmicincurve

but it iscerta inly

cteristic

houldhang

denythat it

ts character

art ofthe



e#pd-us-google


13/97

TO

likeatail in

mportant ifit

ythat it should

inethat we

ourownnature,

isevena

nduct ofa

,whoshould

the rmcon-

ndhista ilgrow ing

sat theendof

effect ofthe

nsearch of

outsidelooks

e tail-pursuing

nthusiasmbut

verylittle

eis that she

,that sheis

henwethink

st. Thouart



e#pd-us-google


14/97

TO

, sa idthe

aidwithall

aman sback

des.

lendsa

toallthe

underous

feelthat a

simplemerely

ty w efeel. in-

tsthat aman

pleat all.A

maywellbefar

anlu ury

lofthepomp

w orld shistory

nse.It was

eceptiveness

had eyesto

earsto



e#pd-us-google


15/97

TO

brought merchant men

ivory,

e.

snot apart ofthe

wasapart ofhis

hisinnocence.

t becontent

unciationat

h is g l or y . W i t h e r ce

ewouldgoa

nddaysand

ppingthe

also f t the li l ies

Talesfrom

edandedited byMr

ulatedtodraw

ethicaland

sw ork . Inone

st sense,the



e#pd-us-google


16/97

TO

e,a genuine

city.The

t maynot

odedbynow .

teris,that an

is mereback-

andscape,his

echnique a ll

t,of which

onscious,than

pousmoral

nesto behis

onbetween

heethicsof

cart liesinthe

ablehasa

eis amoral.

toycomesout

thegreat

art ofallhis

blyunconscious,



e#pd-us-google


17/97

TO

elythat

pprove.The

morningthat

hefolkloresim-

a m an o r a w om a n

theridenti ca-

most saythe

it ieso fbrutemateria ls,

thesoftnessof

na certain

besidethevery

t h es e i n u e nc e s

nw eput beside

earingnon-

y,screaming

tingforan

phumanlife

pper,sneeringat

nout ofrespect

onechaos

nlyPuritan



e#pd-us-google


18/97

TO

n,indeed,we

stoyhasvan-

t todowiththis

whoisinhabiting

goodman.

toreconcile

thTolstoythe

er.It isdiflicult

odrawsinsuch

fthe daily

evil that

bywhichthat

eto age.It

evethat amanw hohas

honestythe

fthelifeofthe

meveryone of

mcolutshipto

lievethat

powerfully

na iro fman, the



e#pd-us-google


19/97

TO

nbeing,with

lives,can

as that which

nancestorsand

cult tobelieve

poignantlythe

pressionwould

chance,lay

t w i th h i s s t . Al l ,

earchaftera

being,if I

enatura lthanit is

onlybe

morehumble

omple . The

itywouldlie

waysdone,

nlikerelishthe

led,thestarof

unesofthe



e#pd-us-google


20/97

TO

otherand

cance. It represents

nawfulc ommon-

themost e treme

uethat we

hesmiter it is

ourcloaktothe

ocomplicated,

ional.The

shouldblush

nd weare

commandof

isnot insane

dtoaplanet of

wassuddenly

umourit would

an i ca l ly f u l l l in g t he

not the

ichstandin

tion,but its

advertisement



e#pd-us-google


21/97

TO

struethat

o thesmiter,

icient reasonisthat

stoyandhis

theyhavethe

theyaremis-

quer.Their

n utterlycon-

that doctrine

ancewhichis

ousofallthe

rye ist ing

trikeofthe

rmidablethan

ons.Ifhuman

n achieving

eywouldbe

rengthof

uldbecalm

foakor iron,

geanceand

1 n1 Ia _



e#pd-us-google


22/97

TO

miliation.The

unciatedby

verconquer

ecan,conquerby

ogySt George

n:hetied a

ckandgaveit

tothem,a

esstoN ero

osomething

yAlfredthe

ecommended

withthebovine

fthis worldis

hecelebrated

r:

ld m a n wh o s ai d , H o w

thisterriblecow

tinuetosmile,

scow.

nhumannatureis



e#pd-us-google


23/97

TO

gni cent; it

o believethe

ofmankind,even

plaintheirown

most ofuswould

rst sight to

Christiansas

somebrawling

ormation,yet

larerrorin

fTolstoyis,

t, oneofthe

icincidentsin

representsa

ionmore

kingofsealsor

farationalist,

dalmost ir-

omenonof

nsthescienti c



e#pd-us-google


24/97

TO

andmakesit essenti-

ofallsocialevol-

dustycasket of

cannot beamiss

onasit reallyis.

kemany

dane traordin-

sdisproved

osophersat the

s rst start ing

universal

gainbymany

aissanceonlya

dandsupremely

religionofPuri-

mphovermany

ntinents.W e

lsofnegation

history but

dinevitably

nday isreally



e#pd-us-google


25/97

TO

ogicalcosmos,

rak,atwilight

enineteenth

fsi teen,be-

epressionare

world.Inour

swhodid

anddrive

eenoutstripped,

korthodo and

sceptics has

nite lymoree cit ing

elidsupon

andthebodyupona

putednot

s,but theele-

property,

.Theyhave

enlyasthe

dtheology

hilosophers

i r



e#pd-us-google


26/97

TO

damnedthe

ernmenmove

yamongtheir

sofnational

tythat would

dderlikeanun

Andthelast

atumaliaof

goesfurthest

sofar,the

ralvalidityof

obedience

amongpirates,

n theliteral

atts orMessrs

erinthewhole

ch atre-

evitalityof

redwiththis,it

eRedSea

esundid stand



e#pd-us-google


27/97

TO

cedwiththe

evolutionists

idealsoffamily

rrorina

, w hocanridthemselves

ctsoftheman

lingto thevery

nnot ridthem-

wo orthree

swrittenin

henrealised,

mningand

cedrationalist

ystrickenwitha

n,seestheim-

niesofthisage

f athousand

lievesfora

ngshanded

nturiesmay,

vestherevolu-



e#pd-us-google


28/97

TO

begunto

bovesug-

elongstothe

hlybedescribed

ththe irstrange

t appalling

atributeto

do iescould

arkableto

both the

underthe

ctualtheoryof

allitskindred

aracterisedby

essandnecessity

or it.A

usane tra-

mentsabout the

htheaccuracyis

sthecon dence.



e#pd-us-google


29/97

TO

otest against

aphrasingat

anis discussing

himstate rst o f

theman

ifhehade -

rly.Hereisan

nswer:

r M as t er H i ms e lf s u m

rciful, beyeperfect even

a t he r i n th e

perfect.

erhaps,

avesaide cept

sicalmodernism

r ld ; b u t t o s ay t h at i t

it, islike

Hepreferred

It isasimple

h.Theauthor



e#pd-us-google


30/97

TO

rdshavemeant

usandpeople,

ectshadpara-

yashe,he

ete t uponw hich

pamphlet in

annot heleft

thereare mis-

atters.Here

philosophically

y content our-

de ny in g: T he f th

shouldtake

e samekind

eigncountries,

odonot

eanantipathy

ertaintowards

whoare in

Ishouldverymuch

wholeofthe



e#pd-us-google


31/97

TO

tor ndsthis

moralproposi-

hesamekind

foranother.

a lly toldthat therewere

peciallyloved.

Hethought

ught ofHis

onalcity

e highest

B eho ldan

Theauthorhassimply

nct things.

velovefor all

uallove forall

esame lovefor

ngnonsense.

impressionhe

tallydifferent

dbyanother

akofhaving



e#pd-us-google


32/97

TO

bothisabout

anwhether

msorbilliards.

ty Henever

elovedmen.

secan love

ngagigantic

that the

etothinkof an

onisthat their

allove,alove

dby theirown

dbean insult

alllies in

ptheteaching

nto verules. It

missesthemost

ftheteaching-

heabyssbe-

oderninter-



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


37/97

hat beerand

g.W herever

thinginvolves

eakercouldlive

reliesthegerm

W henW illiam

ysthat love is

v iousthat heassertsin

nce,politics,am-

rriages,concerts,

or-knockers,

alsandanyother

abulateare

Khayyamsays:

esunderneaththebough,

ndthou

wilderness

diseenow .

ullyasmuch

hetically.He

aysthat he



e#pd-us-google


38/97

hingwas

nk. x amples

lieda hundred-

inelypoetical

as theone

om e a nd r s t b e gi n ni n g

n ds

worththewearof

eo f f riends.

ampleof the

alltrue oy

sofasceticism.

uldhappen

nlosethesense

oyw hichisbe ing

telybeginto

t oygloomyand

ormidable

alledthe



e#pd-us-google


39/97

setheydenied

oflibertyand

wellcallthe

aymelancholy

elves,asarule,

dmeditation.

ample is, how -

ouldhappen

ishathletics

blicschools

nceshould

competitive

hysique,if

o anattitude

ndifferenceto-

ort,thenit is

ppen. uture

atethat inthe

ctoriayoungmen

gew eresub ected

ustorture.



e#pd-us-google


40/97

ntastic

nwine or

bitrari ly x ed

tainbrutal

ls. B igotsinsistedon

oursand

eldsforno

edtheirhea lth

n,manydied

trueandir-

nglandisan

monasticr ules.

emselvesand

nglishathleti-

ceand one

ofsport; w e

giousoffices.

theonecaseand

ther.

mainsiswhat

Christianascetics



e#pd-us-google


41/97

asmerelythe

epossibility

ordinarye ample

ssthemain

earelooking

see onlythe

ddominant

iseofChristi-

riseof self-

pessimism.It

hat themereasser-

nfounding

usticeandmercy

ptimism t to

detailover

madw ith oy

theonly thing

ment.Thewhite

world,the

theirorder.

etreefell and



e#pd-us-google


42/97

ntainsandthe

esedisconnected

bleob ectswere

arfulconspiracy

sschemeof

fN aturewas

edisperfectly

tenablethat

insist,how-

ttertail

theascetics

heygaveup

oran eternity

that thebare

fhappiness

ousandtimes

ousandpagan

eof ranciso fA ssisi

his out; nor

characterof



e#pd-us-google


43/97

etoneofade-

albookisan

onot lookinit

r thesame

kinalove-

woman,

tionsof mind

their

alquan-

ecause the

nablackline.

hiscon ict

ein poetry,

essfule -

d,forinstance,in

Spenser.The

st indecipherable,

ruponwhite.

Mr

ncisprimarilyas

ciscanOrder. We



e#pd-us-google


44/97

,perhapsa

t hewas

eminorthings

dChristianity.

ork of rancisis

d,forthis

almost madden-

wasoneofthe

fulmenthat ever

d.It isthe

ret ofsuchmen

hemselves,and

ruth.W ork-

sarethronged

emselves.Of

ay that the

hisprofound

t isthelack

ybeenthecurse

eons. rancis

yonemust be



e#pd-us-google


45/97

t the ircommon

hewas.He

mperortodraw

sof hisl itt le

Heusedtota lk toany

t about their

togive reinto

wasanin-

sstherobbers

d hi m , a s t he p h ra s e go e s.

theydiscovered

t ro u nd t h em , a nd d i s-

side ofsecret

sasprimarily

ciscanOrder,

ativewith

historyof

whichiscertainly

.Hedis-

ybetweenthe



e#pd-us-google


46/97

derliessomuch

mandthe idea lo f

rwhollyvanished

ut hedoes

t must befor

problemof

rthee cellent

utsiderhedoes

lemat a ll.

,thereisa

ntheposition

essedinlo f tier

anyearthly

t laughterisas

hismonksthe

everforgot

asit ashed

erasit fellfrom

s, perhaps, thehappiest

hismanun-

olepolityon



e#pd-us-google


47/97

hinkthemost

inhisthreevows

bedience,he

ehe lovedmost,

.W hywasit

edandpoetic

eirmost con-

eawfulrenuncia-

o lovedw hereall

nd himselfwhere

yw asheamonk ,

hesequestions

weredfullyhere,

stheyought a t

w ehavea

answeredwe

ndthat muchof the

f ourswas

withthemonks.

manaffairs

es lifeblack



e#pd-us-google


48/97

rtywhichsees

partywhich

tselfw ithsacri ce

sfullof theblaze

the party

ow ersandlights

causeit stands

ncalculable

,and the

hemonkswho

ppiness,and

fromMr

, theclearandtranquil

ad a n e a nd

usof rancis.

e perfection

howninhis

b r ot h er , a n d th e wa t er

i n t he q u ai n t d e ma g og i c de t e ri t y

ontothe shes



e#pd-us-google


49/97

w er e s av e d in t h e l o od .

dgraphic

sappointments

uborbeast that he

g,hisgeniushas

hat ofB ums.

ak nessofB urns

sionalmorbidity,

nonhimself,the

anerandmore

rancis,like

iedakindof

hefamousre-

A lice in

V V h y no t? i mp re ss es u s

uld not see

oodtermswith

and

reoftheMiddle

gintolook



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


52/97

HIS



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


55/97


56/97

einventedsome

to bethe

nironmonger, his

noblepattern,

o f theC ross.

mMorris,

not thelimita-

n.It istrue

iterarywork,

ive,hadin some

plendidwall-

tories,his

s,had,inthe

gthandbreadth

medreallyto

oyaperfectly

madenoaccount o f the

osivepossibil itieso f

meableterrors,

ablehopes.So

ulinevery



e#pd-us-google


57/97

ehad the

at thechestnut

vedagainst

nd,hewould

ouldbe,no

ttedforadecor-

w ereapieceof

dboard.

klittleaccount

umannature- -

peak,ofhuman

und, it isa ltogether

samereaesthete.

cnecessity

o ica lly . Thediff iculty

soneso im-

tobeseparated

sbeforewecan

stheproblem

rateugliness

sofcenturies.



e#pd-us-google


58/97

absurdityofthe

onstrous

owaspre-

singthestrangest

auties,who

eryaureo leof

alcalm ofthe

lf,byafarcical

ckcoat,and

ot hat.-He

mlessmanwho

aiment should

est,ablackand

ficult to

se ofugliness

rought forth

fcenturies.In

not,perhaps,

lyasapillar-

st unmeaning

hick ness ust



e#pd-us-google


59/97

itsco louristhe

-a fat andsoul-

uchofbloodor

le t o f d ea d m en s s i n s.

ateverwhysuch

ssanob ect full

e-houseofa

essofa thousand

dhadsuchan

that it would

thesevere,but

o f thegodof le tter-

hristianshad

vehadaniche

ldenaureoleofSt R ow -

s.As it is,there

orners,disguis-

ifulofideas

posterousof

that the

ot beensuchan



e#pd-us-google


60/97

nationaswere

meninthe

oldthat the

orleagues

ggedat its

ghinghuman

n beentoldthat

pulverising

T h e Tw o pe n ny T u be ,

ownthe reof

half-witted

uldhavebeen

eperceptionofwhat

celement in

doubtedly,the

it requiresa

maginationtoseean

veryside.The

riedout his

thecircum-



e#pd-us-google


61/97

ant.Our

derour feet

,andour

sofasseemed

theirownwild

mandrugged

andstrong

on.So

beenther evolu-

most every

aditstaste

slyimproved,

earlyV ictorian

orealisethe

hthat art,or

netimesout of

uglier than

e c o if f ur e o f

l-paperofa

0.

cent asw asthe



e#pd-us-google


62/97

rris,therewas

mit to it . It didnot l ie

olutionwas

hthiswasa

spartialfailure.

gthedressesof

upholsteredlik earm-

rpedlikew omen,

dit, hew ouldho ld

e costumes

leAges.

essiveand

verseemedto

me ofChaucer

t therewas

fmoralweakness

uldhave

singthemselves

menat the

gthemselves

customof the



e#pd-us-google


63/97

uldnot have

t all.Whatever

ormanners

allyout ofthe

o lead.And

dthat any

of modern

yandnaturally

prefertolead.

ithout hintsand

nthegrowing

thletic costumes.

willbenosub-

n lifeinto

ancy-dress

rris sw ork lay

ybest suggest

wnheart.Of

formed,none,

yandsolidly



e#pd-us-google


64/97

st forthe

mankind.He

showingthat

deepest truth

rdofmen s

ingdetailsmay

ynot haveclimbed

illedsotall

chthingsthat

a fardif ferent

everymodern

thefatherof

sciousness,hypo-

earstous

onecontains

eoldstory,

, o fB eautyand

n,withall the

ure,the

that untilwe

sswe cannot

.< .~ n1.



e#pd-us-google


65/97

stheweak

a reformer:

modernlife,

life,instead

is indeed

ck enough

pse,blazing

ring with

essthepoet can

ashe is,can

citement his

j o i e- d e- v iv r e,

natomyand

usheart,he

ethebeast into

sdisadvantage

stlyachild

hecouldnot

,andconse-

ydevelopit.

s tremendous



e#pd-us-google


66/97

ce intheaestheticw orld

e oftheArts

s, whicharesteeped

apelinthat

at the

aestheticshows,

argemassof

edecorativeschool

sanoble

touchof

cessarythings,

touchedare

gsthat always

ndedthemselves

ereare

ountains,

hairs,beautiful

earenomodern

ereareno

utifulletter-

s,beautifulbicycles.



e#pd-us-google


67/97

ishasnot

andmade

eautiful.And

s healthi-

t thesu-

ugliness of

k fromtheB east

erent end-

Morris sdeepest

at reformer:

plete.There

fthat amanis

rrenandbrilliant,

perfectly.A

ntiontoneeds

yearswemay

moredaring

it ion. Init w e

mourofthe

achineryofthe



e#pd-us-google


68/97

_ l > - - 61 . -_ _ _

allbewrought

t toholdthe

A pil lar-bo sha llbe

resemblematicalo f the

dthesilence

ilwaysignals,

ost poetical,

nddeath,shall

msonworthyof

rvice.B ut

nuinemove-

beauty not

doestrulycome

rst prophet o f

nations,

stiesofart,

wiserlife,his

willberemem-

soncemore

oyant co loursandproved

greyofthe

' -_ _" - T -- : . -



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


70/97

_ _ I :._. _-_ -__ -_



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


73/97

ver,which

sa llegedgloomis

ehadhis

asawriter,

a inhisgospelin

r i s m er e ly p i ti f ul . I f

ltedina Sartor

uldbeavastlymore

Diseasesdo

enthedecadent

hypart ofhis

sprivatefaultsand

hat inthesame

ionofevery

usit issure lyvery

hereourhonest

nalpredilec-

mpt todenounce

gotist cannot

pureinability

g o s pe l . R u sk i n, s a ys



e#pd-us-google


74/97

lthesame, verilybelieve

edonly inhimself .

onbetween

odandthe

ood.Carlyle

ecouldnot

orethanRuskin

inGod,because

gelsefellinto

swereperman-

heretheyboth

od orin

heyfailedinbelief

noughfora

message he

bility.Christ,

esley,MrGladstone,

ndescribable

certainfaculty

nastheir

asonandgood



e#pd-us-google


75/97

thout conde-

icityofcon-

inGod, but inthe

ackingin

credit C arly le s

bsolutely

found

ssenseof theunity

ofa

hasthesame

ntheHebrew

r. A manmust bevery

t hisdiv inity .

elysuggestinga

gue,half-

pingtowards

,wouldeverthink

hematter. B ut to

religionwas

ntainora



e#pd-us-google


76/97


77/97

w egoon, if

tliness,at least

yleto

at hewasthe

alism amove-

modern

ssaidin these

luelessnessof

ogic isnot

asaweapon

gup an

buildlike

rdinonehand

r.The

tivequality,is

sthesword.

tualintellectual

pletothecon-

valuableas a

terminatelogicians.



e#pd-us-google


78/97

rueenoughin

suptheposition

gic isa

it isused

ut anhonest

eoplesay that you

c,theyare not

.W hat they

eanythingby

sticingratitude

ane tra -

henamefor an

nt istheabuse

uswespeak

n e rv e s, w h ic h

ingabout a

ngers. Wespeak

a nd d ig es ti on w he n we m ea n

absenceof

mannerwe

c, when



e#pd-us-google


79/97

dangerof

t thelimitation

erthrowoflogic

eeperandsome-

fthegreat

t theybring

herwords,are

ault isthat

icalhabit they

aretwopartsof

t h e r s t t h e c h oo s in g

secondthe

manity,ifit

ntlytothestudy

ertain tendency

dassumption.

antlyonemay

nrationalistic

Hedidnot

hich he



e#pd-us-google


80/97

T h e wh o le o f h is c a se r e st e d

tw opeculia rit ies

curiousinthe

nishing,again,

ationalists

opic,apparently

edeepas-

nglost their

alcolour and

sassumption. or

ueabout whether

andnever

t all,that

hiswhole

anshould,

withequal

udices,whilethe

chdutyat

man asan

es,asabird



e#pd-us-google


81/97

estartled

mentsbut as-

hedasideall

of thenine-

ncontrovertible,

every different

knewto be

dy less

g,andmore

onsuponwhich

erehisviewwas

asalwaysa

cent heresy. He

stulatesupon

sed itself.He

esswhichassumed

fthanthepeople

hetherwewere

e twelfthcen-

ndedentirely

deservedto be.

- -~ - -- - "



e#pd-us-google


82/97

peciesof

ort which

oncivilisation

theindividual

eencalleda

fthe truth

ected.Since

ousliterature,

anism, therehas

es thesoul

ggested,a

swithhim,as

ors,only

mon-sense.

ensealikeconsist

ceofcertain

chcannot be

evenformally

mmon-sense

sthat weall



e#pd-us-google


83/97

hhaveno

pt aspostulates.

dconsist inbreak ing

new,tothese

sanities.

hkingsa

intained,they

t everyman

kingand

itizenshipfor

y.Ifinequality

ss,it wasa

heverystrength

oworship,

nethesmallest

dbythose

esinwhich he

preferencefor

whichwerea

dwithhis

sphilosophy,



e#pd-us-google


84/97

y imbibedthenotionthat

o fheroworshipw as

edsubmissiontostern

atteroffact,

about some

nhumane

ewisnot

gar andsilly

dedanddriven

humannature

mentally

eventhe

lovea leader

dtoprefer

nhespeaksof

C arlyle stone

elthat forthe

admirationof

chesthevergeof

ewas acidand

sutterances, his



e#pd-us-google


85/97

humane,it

admiredgreat

pscorrectly,

heyweremore

eevilside of

arlyleandhisreligion

nsist inthe

urandsuccess

ndeed,it is

n.W here

sin thefact

odernman,is

eofthat

lgarlycalled

lehog. Ofteninmatters

isasingularly

blemodern

sphilosophy ,

erallof a

dentsfor

dreassert some

_ -g m _- _ _



e#pd-us-google


86/97

isathing

ivelylittlein

andHorace,

ewerepessimists

ly,andoptimists

ut theoptimist

provethat gout

himdancewith

fto-daytoprove

supperconvulse

uish.Carlyle

ththismania

ewishedto

warsofthe

riot at Donny-

peciesof insane

schieferrors,

sms.Let us

e sdefenceof

culousthing,

ndinmoral



e#pd-us-google


87/97

heonly

nforapplying

icaldefenceof

,ofcourse,

t slaveryhas

witharis-

lmost its

chCarlyle

dershave

hat afew

yand rmly

interestsof

snot even

ent forthe

sapossession

forthegood

cyusesthe

eweak slavery

ce ofthe

omanas a

rmlybelieved



e#pd-us-google


88/97


89/97




e#pd-us-google


91/97

-



e#pd-us-google




e#pd-us-google


97/97

ww.hathitrust.org/access_us

e#pd-us-google

gk chesterton - simplicity and tolstoy

Documents